Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Explicit computation of the generic degree of the generalized Verschiebung in rank two

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For a general genus-3 curve in characteristic p>2, the generic degree of Frobenius pull-back is (1/45)(2p^6+5p^4+38p^2).

desk verdict Ranks-two Verschiebung degree computed via dormant opers, but the load-bearing hypotheses live in the second author's unpublished preprints. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03993 v1 pith:DBKQA6UB submitted 2025-09-04 math.AG math.CO

Yuki Kondo , Yasuhiro Wakabayashi This is my paper
classification math.AGmath.CO MSC 14H6014G17
keywords generalizedVerschiebungstablebundlespositivecharacteristicdormantopersbalancededgenumberingsquasi-polynomialFrobeniuspull-backmoduliofcurves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to determine the generic degree of the generalized Verschiebung map: the rational map that pulls a rank-two stable bundle back along Frobenius and lands in the moduli space of stable bundles on the original curve. Only the genus-two case was previously known. The authors prove that, for a general curve of genus g over an algebraically closed field of characteristic p>2, this generic degree is exactly the ratio of two finite combinatorial counts attached to any trivalent graph of genus g: balanced (p,2)-edge numberings divided by balanced (p,1)-edge numberings. Because those counts come from lattice points in rational polytopes, the generic degree is a quasi-polynomial in p of degree 3g-3. For genus 3 the paper evaluates it explicitly as (1/45)(2p^6+5p^4+38p^2).

What carries the argument

The load-bearing comparison is the commutative square between the tangent map of the generalized Verschiebung map and the tangent map of level reduction of dormant PGL_2-opers: at corresponding points these tangent maps are canonically isomorphic. A dormant PGL_2-oper of level N is, roughly, a flat bundle of level N-1 with vanishing p^N-curvature and a line subbundle that generates the rank-two bundle under differential operators, taken modulo tensoring with flat line bundles. On a totally degenerate curve these opers correspond bijectively to balanced (p,N)-edge numberings, i.e. nonnegative integers on the edges of the dual trivalent graph such that every vertex triple satisfies triangle-ty

What would settle it

For a general genus-3 curve in characteristic 3 the formula predicts deg(Ver^2_1)=49; an independent computation of this generic degree, or a direct verification that a genus-3 trivalent graph has exactly 49 balanced (3,2)-edge numberings and 1 balanced (3,1)-edge numbering, would settle the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that the generic degree of the generalized Verschiebung map Ver^2_1 is controlled by the degree of the projection Π_N from the moduli stack of dormant PGL_2-opers of level N to the moduli of curves. For a general curve the paper establishes the identity deg(Π_N) = deg(Π_1) · deg(Ver^2_1)^{N-1}, and a corresponding inequality for non-general curves. The proof works by canonically identifying the differential of Ver^2_{N⇒N'} at a maximally Frobenius-destabilized bundle with the differential of the level-reduction map Π_{N⇒N'} at the associated dormant oper; since the two maps are étale over the same points, their generic degrees coincide. Combining this with the existing fact

Load-bearing premise

The equality deg(Π_N)=deg(Π_1)deg(Ver^2_1)^{N-1} for general curves depends on the previously established generic étaleness of the oper stack Π_N over the moduli of curves, a result quoted from an earlier preprint rather than proved here; if that étaleness failed for some N, the fiber count would not equal the degree and the ratio formula would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every genus g and every odd prime p, the generic degree of Ver^2_1 can in principle be computed by counting balanced edge numberings on any trivalent graph of genus g.
  • The generic degree is a quasi-polynomial in p of degree 3g-3, with leading coefficient (-1)^g 2^{3g-4} B_{2g-2}/(2g-2)!, describing its asymptotic growth as p grows.
  • The rank-two case of the second author's conjecture is settled: for a general curve, deg(Ver^2_1) equals the large-N limit of deg(Π_N)^{1/N}.
  • The known genus-two formula (p^3+2p)/3 is recovered as a special case of the ratio formula.
  • For genus 3, the exact polynomial (1/45)(2p^6+5p^4+38p^2) gives concrete degree values for every odd prime characteristic.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the tangent-space comparison extends to rank n stable bundles, the same procedure would express deg(Ver^n_1) as a ratio of counts of dormant PGL_n-opers of levels 1 and 2, turning the higher-rank conjecture into a finite polytope count.
  • The ratio #Ed_{p,2,G}/#Ed_{p,1,G} being independent of the chosen trivalent graph is a strong constraint; testing both counts on non-isomorphic genus-g graphs would give a purely combinatorial check of the whole correspondence.
  • The quasi-polynomial form implies divisibility structure: for instance, the genus-3 formula is divisible by p^2 for every odd prime, so an independently computed degree for a single new characteristic would test the fitted coefficients.
  • One could formally evaluate the genus-3 formula at p=2, outside the stated hypothesis p>2, to obtain a predicted value that either extends the theorem or signals where the oper correspondence needs modification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the generic degree of the generalized Verschiebung map Ver^2_1 on moduli spaces of rank-2 stable bundles on a general genus-g curve in characteristic p>2. It establishes a comparison, for general curves, between deg(Ver^2_1) and the degree of the projection Π_N from the moduli stack of dormant PGL_2-opers of level N to M_g (Corollary 4.11). Combining this with a combinatorial description of Π_N on totally degenerate curves, the authors express deg(Ver^2_1) as a ratio of counts of balanced (p,N)-edge numberings on a trivalent graph (Theorem 5.3). They show that this ratio is given by a quasi-polynomial Q(p) of degree 3g-3 with known leading coefficient (Theorem 5.5), and for genus 3 they compute Q(p)= (2p^6+5p^4+38p^2)/45 (Theorem 5.6).

Significance. The paper gives a new attack on a long-standing problem: it connects the coarse invariants of Frobenius pull-back on moduli of bundles to a finite combinatorial count via dormant opers. If its hypotheses are satisfied, it produces the first explicit value of deg(Ver^2_1) beyond the known genus-2 case, and the quasi-polynomial statement gives structural information for all genera. The local equivalence in Theorem 4.5, comparing deformation spaces of maximally Frobenius-destabilized bundles and dormant opers, is a strong and potentially reusable result. However, the main theorems are not self-contained: the crucial generic-etaleness, finiteness-flatness, irreducibility, and total-degeneracy fiber-count assertions are quoted from the second author's unpublished preprint [Wak7] and the in-preparation [Wak8]. The proof as written is conditional on those external inputs.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, (3.7); §4.4, Cor. 4.11; §5.1] The central formula deg(Ver^2_1)=#Ed_{p,2,G}/#Ed_{p,1,G} relies on [Wak7, Thms B and C(i)] and [Wak8, Thm A(ii)] for the assertions that Op_{N,g} is smooth, proper, of dimension 3g-3, that Π_N is finite, faithfully flat, and generically étale, and that Π_N is étale at the totally degenerate curve X_G (stated in §5.1 immediately before Theorem 5.3). None of these facts is proved in the present paper, and [Wak8] is marked 'in preparation'. If generic étaleness fails, the fiber size of Π_N does not equal deg(Π_N), so the equality deg(Π_N)=#Ed_{p,N,G} and the subsequent formula for deg(Ver^2_1) do not follow. The authors should either prove the necessary étaleness/finiteness statements or clearly present the main results as conditional on published versions of [Wak7] and [Wak8].
  2. [§4.3, Prop. 4.9; §4.4, Thm. 4.10] The equality in Theorem 4.10 depends on Proposition 4.9, which asserts that the formal fiber of Ver^2_{N⇒N'} over a maximally F-destabilized point splits as deg(Ver^2_{N⇒N'}) copies of the formal neighborhood. The proof of Proposition 4.9 uses [Wak7, Theorem C(i)] to conclude that Π_N is étale at a general point, and hence that Ver is étale at maximally Frobenius-destabilized points. The internal deformation argument is plausible, but the étaleness input is exactly the external fact that is load-bearing for the degree comparison. This step needs a proof or a complete published reference.
  3. [§5.2, values before Thm. 5.6] The explicit values of #Ed_{p,2,G} for genus 3 (p=1,3,5,...,25) are asserted without derivation, with only a reference to [Wak7, §10.5]. These values are the data used to fit the quasi-polynomial Q(t) and to obtain the closed formula for deg(Ver^2_1). This is a load-bearing computation for Theorem C. A reproducible count, or at least a tabulation of the polytope decomposition (5.2) and the resulting systems of linear equations, should be supplied so that the numerical result can be independently checked.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Thm. 4.5] The definitions 'a' := Π_{N⇒N'}(a)' and 'b' := Ver^2_{N⇒N'}(b)' are swapped: a is in SU_X^(N), so should be mapped by Ver, and b is in Op_{N,g}, so should be mapped by Π. This contradicts the displayed diagram (1.3) and the surrounding text.
  2. [Def. 5.2] In the definition of balanced (p,N)-edge numbering, the notation '(a_{ζ(b)})_{b∈B_v}' is inconsistent: ζ(b) is a vertex, while the numbering is indexed by edges. The tuple should be indexed by the edge containing the branch b, e.g. '(a_{e(b)})_{b∈B_v}'.
  3. [§5.2, Prop. 5.4 proof] Property (a) is typeset as 'P1(a) ⊇ P1(a) ⊇ P1(a) \ ∂P1(a)', which is tautological as printed. It should presumably read '\overline{P_1(a)} ⊇ P_1(a) ⊇ \overline{P_1(a)} \setminus ∂P_1(a)' (and similarly for P_2(a)).
  4. [Key words] 'Vershiebung' is a typo for 'Verschiebung'.
  5. [§5.1, Remark 5.1] Several occurrences of 'characteristic pN' should read 'characteristic p^N'; the superscript is missing (see the discussion of Gauss hypergeometric differential operators).
  6. [Prop. 4.6 proof] The text 'For each2 ∈ {T, η, s}' is missing a symbol; it should read 'For each 2 ∈ {T, η, s}'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The combinatorial computation itself is independent, but the central degree-to-fiber-count identification rests on generic étaleness and irreducibility imported from the second author's own [Wak7]/[Wak8].

  1. self citation load bearing [§3.2 after (3.7); used in §4.4 (Theorem 4.10 / Corollary 4.11)]
    "According to [Wak7, Theorems B and C, (i)] ... Π_N : Op... → M_g is finite, faithfully flat, and generically étale. ... Since Op... is irreducible for every N (cf. [Wak8, Theorem A, (ii)]), the morphism Π_{N⇒N'} is surjective."

    The paper's key equality deg(Π_N)=deg(Π_1)·deg(Ver2_1)^{N-1} (Cor 4.11), and hence Theorems B and C, require that deg(Π_{N⇒N'}) equal the number of points in a fiber. That identification needs Π_N generically étale and Π_{N⇒N'} surjective, both cited to the second author's own works ([Wak7] preprint, [Wak8] 'in preparation') rather than proved here. If generic étaleness or irreducibility failed, fiber counts would not equal degrees and the formula deg(Ver2_1)=♯Ed_{p,2}/♯Ed_{p,1} would not follow from this paper's arguments.

  2. self citation load bearing [§5.1, just before Theorem 5.3]
    "Since the projection Π_N is étale over all the points of totally degenerate curves (cf. [Wak7, Theorem C, (i)]), the degree deg(Π_N) coincides with the total number of dormant PGL... opers on X_G. ... Consequently, we obtain the following equality: deg(Π_N) = ♯(Ed_{p,N,G}) (cf. [Wak7, Theorem E])."

    The numerical input deg(Π_N)=♯Ed_{p,N,G} that drives the final formula is imported wholesale from [Wak7, Theorem E] together with the étaleness assertion from [Wak7, Theorem C(i)]. The paper then algebraically inverts this equality to express deg(Ver2_1) as a ratio of edge-numbering counts. Thus the central 'prediction' is forced by this self-citation chain; however, the edge-numbering counts themselves are explicit and independent, and the subsequent quasi-polynomial interpolation is legitimate, so this is partial circularity rather than a purely definitional one.

full rationale

No step in this paper defines the Verschiebung degree in terms of edge numberings, nor fits a parameter and calls it a prediction. The local correspondence (Thm 4.5) between maximally F^N-destabilized bundles and dormant opers, and the formal-completion arguments (Prop 4.6, 4.9), are substantive internal mathematics. The g=3 formula is obtained by counting the explicit finite sets Ed_{p,2,G} and interpolating the resulting quasi-polynomial, which is independent of the target value. The circularity risk is concentrated in two imported facts: generic étaleness of Π_N and irreducibility of Op_{N,g}, both from the second author's own prior/in-preparation work ([Wak7], [Wak8]). These facts are load-bearing: they convert fiber cardinalities into degrees. They are neither proved nor independently verified in the present text. This is more than a minor self-citation, but the paper still contains independent content (edge-numbering enumeration, quasi-polynomial interpolation), so the appropriate score is 4 rather than 6-8.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its load-bearing assumptions are almost entirely theorems from the second author's earlier work, including an in-preparation reference. The only genuinely new axiom-like content is a set of definitions for balanced edge numberings, which themselves come from [Wak7].

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Π_N: Op^{Zzz...}_{N,g} → M_g is finite, faithfully flat, and generically etale (from [Wak7, Theorems B and C(i)])
    Invoked in Section 3.2 and used in Corollary 4.11 to equate deg(Π_N) with the number of dormant PGL_2-opers on a general curve. If this fails, the central degree equality breaks.
  • domain assumption deg(Π_N) equals the number of balanced (p,N)-edge numberings: deg(Π_N) = #Ed_{p,N,G} (from [Wak7, Theorem E])
    Used in Section 5.1 to convert the theorem into the combinatorial ratio that yields the genus-3 formula.
  • domain assumption #Ed_{p,N,G} is given by an Ehrhart quasi-polynomial H_N(p) of degree (3g-3)N with period dividing 4 (from [Wak7, Theorem 10.24])
    Used in Section 5.2 to derive the quasi-polynomial Q(t) for deg(Ver).
  • domain assumption The moduli stack Op^{Zzz...}_{N,g} is irreducible (from [Wak8], in preparation)
    Used in Section 3.2 to conclude the level-reduction morphism Π_{N⇒N'} is surjective; the cited source is not publicly available.
  • domain assumption Ver^2_1 is generically etale for general X (from [MeSu, Corollary 2.1.1])
    Used in Section 2.1 and Theorem 4.10 to define the generic degree via etale fibers.
  • domain assumption deg(Π_1) = p^{g-1}/2^{2g-1} · Σ_{θ=1}^{p-1} 1/ sin^{2g-2}(πθ/p) (from [Wak1, Theorem A])
    Used in Corollary 4.11 for the final explicit expression of the bound and equality.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Explicit computation of the generic degree of the generalized Verschiebung in rank two." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DBKQA6UB

@misc{pith2026250903993,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Explicit computation of the generic degree of the generalized Verschiebung in rank two},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DBKQA6UB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03993}
}
abstract

The purpose of this paper is to apply previous work on dormant opers to the study of the moduli space of stable bundles in positive characteristic. We affirmatively resolve the rank $2$ case of a conjecture proposed by the second author, which predicts a direct relationship between the number of higher-level dormant $\mathrm{PGL}_2$-opers and the generic degree of the generalized Verschiebung map for rank $2$ stable bundles induced by Frobenius pull-back. As a consequence, we obtain a procedure for explicitly determining these generic degrees in the previously unexplored range of genera by counting certain combinatorial objects.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Polynomiality of the Generalized Verschiebung Degree

    math.AG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The generic degree of the generalized Verschiebung map is a polynomial in the characteristic p, with the explicit polynomial derived.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Berthelot, -modules arithm\' e tiques I

    P. Berthelot, -modules arithm\' e tiques I. Op\' e rateurs diff\' e rentiels de niveau fini, Ann. Sci. \' E cole Norm. Sup. 29 (1996), pp. 185-272

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Brenner, A

    H. Brenner, A. Kaid, On deep Frobenius descent and flat bundles, Math. Res. Lett. 15 (2008), pp. 1101-1115

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Castorena, F

    A. Castorena, F. Neumann, On actions of Frobenius morphisms for moduli stacks of principal bundles over algebraic curves, Bull. Sci. Math. 193 (2024), Paper No. 103450, 26 pp

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Deligne, D

    P. Deligne, D. Mumford, The irreducibility of the space of curves of given genus, Inst. Hautes \' E tudes Sci. Publ. Math. 36 (1969), pp. 75-109

    work page 1969

  5. [5]

    J. P. dos Santos, On the number of Frobenius-trivial vector bundles on specific curves, Arch. Math. (Basel) 99 (2012), pp. 227-235

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Ducrohet, V

    L. Ducrohet, V. Mehta, Density of vector bundles periodic under the action of Frobenius, Bull. Sci. Math. 134 (2010), pp. 454-460

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Gieseker, Stable curves and the Frobenius morphism, Ann

    D. Gieseker, Stable curves and the Frobenius morphism, Ann. Scient. \' E c. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), pp. 95-101

    work page 1973

  8. [8]

    M. Gros, B. Le Stum, A. Quir\' o s, A Simpson correspondance in positive characteristic, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 46 (2010), pp. 1-35

    work page 2010

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Hartshorne, Algebraic geometry , Grad

    R. Hartshorne, Algebraic geometry , Grad. Texts in Math., 52 Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg (1977), xvi+496 pp

    1977

  2. [10]

    Heinloth, Lectures on the moduli stack of vector bundles on a curve, Trends Math

    J. Heinloth, Lectures on the moduli stack of vector bundles on a curve, Trends Math. Birkh\" a user/Springer Basel AG, Basel (2010), pp. 123-153

    2010

  3. [11]

    Hoshi, Y

    Y. Hoshi, Y. Wakabayashi, An upper bound on the generic degree of the generalized Verschiebung for rank two stable bundles, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 228 (2024), Paper No. 107605, 14 pp

    2024

  4. [12]

    Joshi, The degree of the dormant operatic locus, Int

    K. Joshi, The degree of the dormant operatic locus, Int. Math. Res. Not. 9 (2017), pp. 2599-2613

    2017

  5. [13]

    Joshi, C

    K. Joshi, C. Pauly, Hitchin-Mochizuki morphism, opers and Frobenius-destabilized vector bundles over curves, Adv. Math. 274 (2015), pp. 39-75

    2015

  6. [14]

    Joshi, S

    K. Joshi, S. Ramanan, E. Z. Xia, J. K. Yu, On vector bundles destabilized by Frobenius pull-back, Compos. Math. 142 (2006), pp. 616-630

    2006

  7. [15]

    Joshi, E

    K. Joshi, E. Z. Xia, Moduli of vector bundles on curves in positive characteristics, Compos. Math. 122 (2000), pp. 315-321

    2000

  8. [16]

    Lange, C

    H. Lange, C. Pauly, On Frobenius-destabilized rank- 2 vector bundles over curves. Comment. Math. Helv. 83 (2008), pp. 179-209

    2008

  9. [17]

    Laszlo, A non-trivial family of bundles fixed by the square of Frobenius, C

    Y. Laszlo, A non-trivial family of bundles fixed by the square of Frobenius, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S\' e r. I Math. 333 (2001), pp. 651-656

    2001

  10. [18]

    Laszlo, C

    Y. Laszlo, C. Pauly, The action of the Frobenius maps on rank 2 vector bundles in characteristic 2 , J. Algebraic Geom. 11 (2002), pp. 219-243

    2002

  11. [19]

    Laszlo, C

    Y. Laszlo, C. Pauly, The Frobenius map, rank 2 vector bundles and Kummer's quartic surface in characteristic 2 and 3 , Adv. Math. 185 (2004), pp. 246-269

    2004

  12. [20]

    Le Stum, A

    B. Le Stum, A. Quir\' o s, Transverse crystals of finite level, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 47 (1997), pp. 69-100

    1997

  13. [21]

    Li, On maximally Frobenius destabilized vector bundles, Bull

    L. Li, On maximally Frobenius destabilized vector bundles, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 99 (2019), pp. 195-202

    2019

  14. [22]

    Li, Frobenius stratification of moduli spaces of rank 3 vector bundles in positive characteristic 3 , I, Trans

    L. Li, Frobenius stratification of moduli spaces of rank 3 vector bundles in positive characteristic 3 , I, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 372 (2019), pp. 5693-5711

    2019

  15. [23]

    Li, Frobenius stratification of moduli spaces of rank 3 vector bundles in positive characteristic 3 , II, Math

    L. Li, Frobenius stratification of moduli spaces of rank 3 vector bundles in positive characteristic 3 , II, Math. Res. Lett. 27 (2020), pp. 501-522

    2020

  16. [24]

    Li, On Frobenius stratification of moduli spaces of rank 4 vector bundles, Manuscripta Math

    L. Li, On Frobenius stratification of moduli spaces of rank 4 vector bundles, Manuscripta Math. 173 (2024), pp. 961-976

    2024

  17. [25]

    F. Liu, B. Osserman, Mochizuki's indigenous bundles and Ehrhart polynomials, J. Algebraic Combin. 26 (2006), pp. 125-136

    2006

  18. [26]

    V. B. Mehta, S. Subramanian, Nef line bundles which are not ample, Math. Z. 219 (1995), pp. 235-244

    1995

  19. [27]

    Mochizuki, Foundations of p -adic Teichm\" u ller theory , AMS/IP Stud

    S. Mochizuki, Foundations of p -adic Teichm\" u ller theory , AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math., 11 American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; International Press, Cambridge, MA (1999), xii+529 pp

    1999

  20. [28]

    Montagnon, G\' e n\' e ralisation de la th\' e orie arithm\' e tique des D-modules \` a la g\' e om\' e trie logarithmique, Ph.D

    C. Montagnon, G\' e n\' e ralisation de la th\' e orie arithm\' e tique des D-modules \` a la g\' e om\' e trie logarithmique, Ph.D. thesis, L'universit\' e de Rennes I (2002)

    2002

  21. [29]

    Neumann, U

    F. Neumann, U. Stuhler, Moduli stacks of vector bundles and Frobenius morphisms Hindustan Book Agency, Delhi (2005), pp. 126-146

    2005

  22. [30]

    Osserman, The generalized Verschiebung map for curves of genus 2 , Math

    B. Osserman, The generalized Verschiebung map for curves of genus 2 , Math. Ann. 336 (2006), pp. 963-986

    2006

  23. [31]

    Osserman, Frobenius-unstable bundles and p -curvature, Trans

    B. Osserman, Frobenius-unstable bundles and p -curvature, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (2008), pp. 273-305

    2008

  24. [32]

    The Stacks Project Authors, The Stacks project, https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0ASF

  25. [33]

    Yang, The fixed point locus of the Verschiebung on _X (2, 0) for genus- 2 curves X in characteristic 2 , Canad

    Y. Yang, The fixed point locus of the Verschiebung on _X (2, 0) for genus- 2 curves X in characteristic 2 , Canad. Math. Bull. 57 (2014), pp. 439-448

    2014

  26. [34]

    Wakabayashi, An explicit formula for the generic number of dormant indigenous bundles, Publ

    Y. Wakabayashi, An explicit formula for the generic number of dormant indigenous bundles, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 50 (2014), pp. 383-409

    2014

  27. [35]

    Wakabayashi, Spin networks, Ehrhart quasi-polynomials, and combinatorics of dormant indigenous bundles, Kyoto J

    Y. Wakabayashi, Spin networks, Ehrhart quasi-polynomials, and combinatorics of dormant indigenous bundles, Kyoto J. Math. 59 (2019), pp. 649-684

    2019

  28. [36]

    Wakabayashi, A theory of dormant opers on pointed stable curves , Ast\' e risque 432 , Soc

    Y. Wakabayashi, A theory of dormant opers on pointed stable curves , Ast\' e risque 432 , Soc. Math. de France, (2022), ix+296 pp

    2022

  29. [37]

    Wakabayashi, Differential modules and dormant opers of higher level, arXiv: math

    Y. Wakabayashi, Differential modules and dormant opers of higher level, arXiv: math. AG/2201.11266v1, (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Wakabayashi, A combinatorial description of the dormant Miura transformation, Bull

    Y. Wakabayashi, A combinatorial description of the dormant Miura transformation, Bull. Iranian Math. Soc. 49 (2023), Paper No. 81, 26 pp

    2023

  31. [39]

    Wakabayashi, Frobenius pull-back of parabolic bundles and dormant opers, Proc

    Y. Wakabayashi, Frobenius pull-back of parabolic bundles and dormant opers, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) 135 (2025), Paper No. 25, 38 pp

    2025

  32. [40]

    Wakabayashi, Arithmetic liftings and 2d TQFT for dormant opers of higher level, arXiv: math

    Y. Wakabayashi, Arithmetic liftings and 2d TQFT for dormant opers of higher level, arXiv: math. AG/2209.08528v3, (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Wakabayashi, The irreducibility of the moduli space of pointed stable curves with dormant PGL _2^ ( ) -oper, in preparation

    Y. Wakabayashi, The irreducibility of the moduli space of pointed stable curves with dormant PGL _2^ ( ) -oper, in preparation

  34. [42]

    Zhao, Maximally Frobenius-destabilized vector bundles over smooth algebraic curves, Internat

    Y. Zhao, Maximally Frobenius-destabilized vector bundles over smooth algebraic curves, Internat. J. Math. 28 (2017), 1750003, 26 pp

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.