Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Fractal Properties of the Cosmic Web

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Correlation functions are blind to the shape of the cosmic web; the fractal dimension function recovers what projection hides, including true 3D correlation lengths near 6 h⁻¹ Mpc.

desk verdict A rich historical review, but the headline 2D–3D correlation-length offset is likely a normalization artifact; the general point about pattern-sensitive statistics survives but the r0≈6 corollary does not. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04252 v1 pith:BFOHDSDS submitted 2025-09-04 astro-ph.CO

Jaan Einasto This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO MSC 85A4028A80 PACS 98.80.-k
keywords cosmicwebfractaldimensioncorrelationfunctiongalaxyclusteringstructurehomogeneitydarkmatterhaloslarge-scale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the standard two-point correlation function, the usual measure of how clustered galaxies are, does not capture the filament-and-void pattern of the cosmic web. The review makes the case for using a shape-sensitive statistic, the fractal dimension function D(r)=3+γ(r), built from the structure function g(r)=1+ξ(r). Applying it to galaxy surveys and dark-matter simulations, the author finds that 2D projected correlation functions systematically wash out the web's small-scale structure, which is why older angular surveys quoted correlation lengths near 4.5 h⁻¹ Mpc while the true 3D values are closer to 6 h⁻¹ Mpc. The fractal dimension function also locates a transition near 2 h⁻¹ Mpc between dark-matter halo interiors and the filament network, and shows that uniformity is approached only asymptotically near 100 h⁻¹ Mpc. A reader should care because any clustering analysis built on projected galaxy positions inherits this thickness-dependent bias.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the fractal dimension function D(r)=3+γ(r), where γ(r) is the log–log gradient of the structure function g(r)=1+ξ(r). Unlike the correlation function, D(r) responds to the local pattern of the density field, so it can distinguish the nearly uniform interiors of halos from the one-dimensional filament network; its minimum near r≈2 h⁻¹ Mpc marks the halo/filament transition. The second device is the projection test: the 3D density field is integrated along one axis into 2D sheets of shrinking thickness, demonstrating that the amplitude and slope of the 2D correlation function depend on sheet thickness, which is why projected surveys erase web structure.

What would settle it

Measure the real-space 3D correlation function of a large, complete sample of faint galaxies without projection, for example from a spectroscopic survey with robust distance estimates; if r0 comes out near 4.5 h⁻¹ Mpc rather than near 6 h⁻¹ Mpc, the paper's central 2D/3D claim is falsified. In simulations, the equivalent test is to compute 2D correlation functions from density-field sheets of decreasing thickness: if the projected functions do not converge to the 3D function as the sheets become thin, the projection-erasure mechanism fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that correlation functions encode amplitudes but not phases, so they cannot distinguish a web-like galaxy distribution from a random one with the same pair counts; the fractal dimension function D(r)=3+d log[1+ξ(r)]/d log r recovers the pattern information the correlation function loses. Comparing SDSS galaxies with density-threshold-selected dark-matter particles in ΛCDM simulations, the review finds a two-regime structure: below roughly 2–3 h⁻¹ Mpc the function describes matter inside dark-matter halos, above it describes the distribution of halos along filaments. By projecting 3D density fields into 2D sheets of decreasing thickness, it shows that projection erases th

Load-bearing premise

The argument treats a sharp density-threshold cut in simulated dark-matter particles as an adequate stand-in for a luminosity-selected galaxy sample; if the stochastic fuzzy nature of galaxy formation makes that mapping unreliable, the quantitative 3D correlation lengths and the halo-to-filament transition inferred from the comparison no longer follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Published projected correlation lengths for faint galaxies understate the true 3D value: r0 rises from about 4.5 to about 6 h⁻¹ Mpc.
  • The fractal dimension function becomes a practical diagnostic for locating the halo–filament boundary near r≈2 h⁻¹ Mpc, a scale set by halo sizes rather than by cosmology.
  • Thick 2D projections naturally generate the apparently scale-free angular correlation power law with index γ≈1.7, so the old constant-slope result is a projection-depth artifact, not evidence for a single fractal dimension.
  • The scale of homogeneity is not a sharp cutoff: D(r) reaches 3 near 100 h⁻¹ Mpc, while the largest superclusters extend to 200 h⁻¹ Mpc.
  • Correlation length depends on galaxy luminosity through the biasing of high-density regions, with faint galaxies largely tracing brighter galaxies as satellites.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If projection dilutes correlation amplitudes, earlier galaxy-bias estimates based on projected surveys may be systematically low, and the luminosity dependence of bias may need recalibration.
  • The D(r) minimum near the halo boundary could be cross-checked against other halo-edge estimators such as splashback radii; if they track each other across mass, D(r) becomes a cheap structural diagnostic for simulations and surveys.
  • The same thin-slice convergence test could be applied to redshift-space correlation functions: if line-of-sight redshift distortions behave like thick projection, they may shift the two-regime signature, with consequences for standard clustering analyses.
  • A direct extension of this review would be to measure D(r) from thin slices of future wide spectroscopic surveys and verify that the recovered 3D correlation length is independent of slice thickness; residual thickness dependence would point to remaining projection effects.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is a review of the fractal properties of the cosmic web in the ΛCDM framework. It summarizes the history of fractal studies, defines the two-point correlation function ξ(r), the structure function g(r)=1+ξ(r), the log-log gradient γ(r), and the scale-dependent fractal dimension D(r)=3+γ(r). Using SDSS galaxies and ΛCDM, Millennium, and EAGLE simulations, it discusses the luminosity/density dependence of clustering, the two-regime structure of the fractal dimension function (halo interiors versus filament distribution), the relation between 2D and 3D correlation functions, the void hierarchy seen in velocity data, and the scale of homogeneity. The central conceptual claim is that two-point correlation functions are insensitive to the phase/pattern/shape of the cosmic web, so pattern-sensitive statistics are needed. A specific corollary in Section 7.2 is that 2D projected correlation functions underestimate the true 3D correlation length for faint galaxies: r0 ≈ 4.5 h−1 Mpc from 2D analyses versus a claimed true value near 6 h−1 Mpc.

Significance. The conceptual point that correlation functions are insensitive to the shape/pattern of the cosmic web is important and well supported by standard phase-randomization arguments. The review usefully collects historical context, and the definitions of ξ, g, γ, and D are standard. The paper also compares SDSS data with several independent simulations, which is a strength. However, the quantitative corollary about a 2D/3D r0 discrepancy is not established: the comparison of raw 2D slab amplitudes with 3D ξ is affected by the 1/L normalization of the projection, and the Abel-type inversion given in Eq. (5) is not applied to the simulated slab correlation functions. The review is therefore primarily of pedagogical and historical value; its main quantitative conclusion needs reworking.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2, Eq. (5)] The written inversion is not the Davis–Peebles Abel inversion. The standard inversion is ξ(r) = −(1/π) ∫_r^∞ [d w_p(r_p)/d r_p] / sqrt(r_p^2 − r^2) d r_p; Eq. (5) omits the derivative. As printed, Eq. (5) is not dimensionally consistent with Eq. (4). Also, the assertion in Section 7 that Eq. (5) assumes the 3D and projected 2D density fields are statistically similar is incorrect; the Abel relation is an exact consequence of projecting a statistically isotropic and stationary 3D field. This matters because Section 7 uses that alleged invalidity to motivate the 2D/3D comparison.
  2. [Section 7.1/7.2, Eq. (13), Figs. 13 and 14] The 2D correlation functions in Fig. 13 are computed from the projected overdensity δ2 = ∫δ dz. For a surface-density normalized CF, the amplitude is approximately (1/L^2) ∫∫ dz dz' ξ(...), i.e., it carries a 1/L suppression. The pronounced amplitude decrease with increasing L in Fig. 13 is therefore to leading order the 1/L normalization, not a loss of small-scale information. This is why standard analyses use w_p(rp)=∫ ξ(rp,π)dπ without dividing by L and then invert with the Abel equation. The paper does not apply Eq. (5) to its simulated slab CFs. Without such a test, the inference in Section 7.2 that the true 3D correlation lengths for faint galaxies are near 6 h−1 Mpc rather than 4.5 h−1 Mpc is not supported. The corollary should be demonstrated by applying the inversion to the simulated 2D CFs, or removed.
  3. [Section 7.2 vs Section 5.3/Fig. 10] The text states that the inferred r0 ≈ 6 h−1 Mpc 'aligns closely' with Fig. 10. However, Section 5.3 and Fig. 10 report r0 ≈ 5 h−1 Mpc for low and intermediate luminosity SDSS and Millennium galaxies, with EAGLE at about 4.5 h−1 Mpc. The claimed agreement is not apparent from the figure and text. This internal inconsistency must be resolved: either Fig. 10 shows r0 ≈ 6 for the relevant samples, which should be stated explicitly, or the 'near 6' conclusion is not actually supported by the author's own measurements.
  4. [Section 5.1] The sample construction maps density-threshold-selected DM particles onto luminosity-selected galaxy samples. The statement that 'a fuzzy density limit has little influence on the properties of correlation functions' is asserted without support. Because the comparison of fractal dimension functions (Fig. 12) and the inferred halo/filament transition at r ≈ 2 h−1 Mpc rest on this mapping, the paper should provide a test (e.g., varying the sharpness of the density threshold) or explicitly label the model–observation comparison as illustrative rather than quantitative.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Notation, Eq. (1) and Eq. (8)] The symbol γ is used both for the power-law slope in Eq. (1) (where γ ≈ 1.77) and for the gradient function γ(r) in Eq. (8). The sign convention and the relation between the two uses should be stated more prominently to avoid confusion.
  2. [Section 4.3, Eq. (9)] The relation between the averaged correlation dimension D2 = 3 + d log ĝ/d log r and the local fractal dimension D(r) = 3 + γ(r) in Eq. (11) is not explained. It should be clarified which estimator is used for the figures and how the two definitions are connected.
  3. [Figure 10] The horizontal axis is labeled only 'M'; it should be specified as M_r − 5 log h to match the text.
  4. [Figures 13 and 14] Legend labels such as 'LCDM.10.0001' and 'Mill.20.5.0001' are not defined in the captions. Please state explicitly which curve corresponds to which slab thickness L (or number of sheets n).
  5. [Section 4.1] The sentence 'as shown by simulation by Shandarin and Klypin and Shandarin [99]' is garbled. It should read something like 'as shown in simulations by Shandarin and by Klypin and Shandarin [99]'.
  6. [Typos] There are several typographical errors: '21th century' in Section 5; 'Prinseton' in references [90] and [104]; and 'Tartu Astr. Obs. Preprint' in reference [56] is fine but inconsistent formatting appears elsewhere.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the review's central claims are calibration-based and grounded in independent simulations and public SDSS data, not definitional equivalences.

full rationale

The paper is a review that re-presents the author's earlier simulation analyses. The central quantitative inference—that faint galaxies with 2D r0≈4.5 h−1 Mpc have true 3D correlation lengths near 6 h−1 Mpc—is a model calibration: observed 2D amplitudes are mapped through the 2D/3D amplitude relation measured in ΛCDM and Millennium simulations (Einasto et al. 2021), and the 3D r0 is read from the simulations' 3D correlation function. This is not a tautology or a fit renamed as a prediction; it is an externally falsifiable, simulation-based inference. The fractal dimension function D(r)=3+γ(r) is defined as the logarithmic derivative of g(r)=1+ξ(r), so the paper's 'pattern-sensitive statistic' is a derivative of the two-point correlation function; this is an internal tension or a correctness concern, but not a circular derivation because the paper does not define ξ in terms of D or vice versa. Numerous self-citations appear, but the load-bearing figures and claims are also documented in the text and derive from public SDSS data and externally published simulations (Millennium, EAGLE, LCDM runs), so the self-citations are not the sole support. The assertion that a fuzzy density threshold has little influence is unproved, and the Section 7 comparison likely conflates projection normalization with information loss, but these are correctness risks, not circular steps. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to its input, and no prediction is equivalent to a fitted parameter.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new entities, forces, or dimensions. Its central analytical quantities (structure function, fractal dimension function) are standard statistics from prior literature. The only case-specific parameters are the particle density threshold ρ0, which selects biased simulation samples, and the projection thickness L, which is a deliberately varied control in the 2D vs 3D comparison.

free parameters (2)
  • Particle density threshold ρ0 = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 (in units of mean density)
    Used to select biased samples of dark matter particles in ΛCDM simulations to mimic luminosity-selected galaxy samples (Section 5.1, Figure 9). Values are chosen by hand, not fitted. The choice strongly affects the amplitude of correlation functions and the depth of the fractal dimension minimum (Figure 12).
  • Projection thickness L for 2D samples = L = L0/n for n = 1 to 2048, i.e., 0.25 to 512 h−1 Mpc
    Controlled variable in the 2D vs 3D comparison (Section 7.1, Figure 13). Not fitted, but the central claim that 2D correlation function amplitude depends on thickness rests on scanning this parameter. The choice of n values is discretization, not a fit.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Concordant ΛCDM universe with dark matter and dark energy is the correct framework
    Stated in the abstract and in Section 2. All analyses use ΛCDM simulations and SDSS data interpreted within this model, including the assumptions of dark matter and dark energy.
  • domain assumption Galaxy formation is a threshold phenomenon; biased particle samples with ρ ≥ ρ0 imitate galaxy samples
    Invoked in Section 5.1 and 5.2, following White and Rees [121]. The comparison between model fractal dimensions and observed SDSS samples (Figure 12) rests on this mapping. The paper asserts that a fuzzy threshold has little influence, but does not prove it.
  • domain assumption Dark matter halos have universal density profiles (NFW/Einasto)
    Section 6, Equation (12). Used to interpret the minimum in the fractal dimension function at r ≈ 2 h−1 Mpc as the boundary between halo interior and the filamentary web. The Einasto profile with α = 1/N = 0.16 is cited from prior work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractal Properties of the Cosmic Web." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BFOHDSDS

@misc{pith2026250904252,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractal Properties of the Cosmic Web},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BFOHDSDS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04252}
}
abstract

The cosmic web is one of the most complex systems in nature, consisting of galaxies and clusters of galaxies joined by filaments and walls, leaving large empty regions called cosmic voids. The most common method of describing the web is a correlation function and its derivative, the fractal function. In this paper, I provide a review of the fractal properties of the cosmic web from the observational point of view within the Newtonian concordance $\Lambda$CDM Universe framework. I give a brief history of fractal studies of the Universe. I then describe the derivation of the fractal function from angular and spatial distributions of galaxies and their relations. Correlation functions are not sensitive to the shape of the galaxy distribution. To improve our quantitative understanding of properties of the web, statistics must be used which are sensitive to the pattern of the web.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04252 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The evolution of radiation (ΩR(z)), matter (Ωm(z)), and dark energy (ΩΛ(z)) densities shown as a function of redshift z [28]. Reproduced with permission from J. Einasto, G. Hütsi, I. Szapudi, P. Tenjes, Spinning the Cosmic Web; published by World Scientific, 2025. The third important epoch in the cosmic history is the recombination of hydrogen at z ≈ 1000 at temperatures around 3000◦ K. The emission from this epoch … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Left): Map of Lick survey galaxies in the northern galactic hemisphere brighter than mB ≤ 18.9 and north of galactic latitude b ≥ 40◦ [45]. (Right): Simulated map of galaxies imitating the 2D distribution of Lick galaxies [45]. Soneira and Peebles [45] developed a fractal model Universe to match the character of the galaxy distribution in the Lick survey. The model assigns ‘galaxy’ positions in a three-dimensional … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. (Left : Wedge diagram for the 30◦ – 45◦ declination zone. Filled circles show rich clusters of galaxies, open circles—groups, dots—galaxies, crosses—Markarian galaxies [59]. (Right): Distribution of particles in simulations by Shandarin (1975, private communication) and [60]. The origin of this filamentary structure was analyzed by Bond et al. [62], who in￾troduced the term “cosmic web” to characterize this phenomen… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The correlation length, r0 as function of the limiting redshift, V0. Designations are as follows: open circles — galaxy samples in the direction of the Coma supercluster; crosses — galaxy samples in the direction of the Perseus-Pisces supercluster; triangles – samples …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Left panel): the correlation function of the observed sample O around the Virgo cluster (cube of side 80 Mpc), of the sample generated by the hierarchical clustering model H, and of the adiabatic model A. (Right panel): the maximal length LM of connected regions as a …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Slice of the density field from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey at a distance of 240 h −1 Mpc and thickness of 10 h −1 Mpc. At lower part of the figure, the Sloan Great Wall is seen [13]. Reproduced with permission from Einasto, J., Dark Matter and Cosmic Web Story; publi…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Correlation functions of galaxies, ξ(r). (Left panel) shows ΛCDM model of box size 512 h −1 Mpc for different particle selection limits. (Right panel) is for SDSS galaxies using five luminosity thresholds [119]. 5.3. Luminosity Dependence of the Correlation Length The …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Correlation length r0 in h −1 Mpc of SDSS galaxies as a function of their absolute mag￾nitudes. For comparison, we also show the correlation lengths of the EAGLE and Millennium simulations for various magnitude bins [119]. The data presented above allow calculating th…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The structural functions are defined as g(r) = 1 + ξ(r). The positioning of the panels remains consistent with what is illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The fractal dimension functions are expressed as D(r) = 3 + γ(r). The positioning of the panels corresponds to that depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (Left): The two-dimensional correlation functions (CFs) of the ΛCDM model are presented with a particle density threshold of ρ0 = 10, analyzed across various thicknesses of 2D samples. (Right): The two-dimensional CFs of the Millennium samples, constrained by a magnit…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: , for thicker samples, the slope of the two-dimensional CF exhibits a gradual variation over an extensive range of separations, specifically for rp > 1 h −1 Mpc. This be￾havior supports the established observation that the two-dimensional CF can be effectively modeled…
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Hierarchy of structure in the cosmic web. The left-hand panel shows the density field on a thin slice across a 64 Mpc h−1 simulation with ! cold dark matter concordance cosmology. The right-hand panels show the highlighted square inside the slice. The density field in …
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Density field across a thin slice of the simulation box at z =0 after linear-regime smoothing for three cases: original field (left-hand panel), 2 h−1 Mpc (central panel) and 4 h−1 Mpc (right-hand panel) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Hierarchical Cosmic Spine superimposed to its corresponding density field for the bottom, middle and top levels (left-hand, central and right-hand panels, respectively). The black lines delineate the boundaries of the voids found with the hierarchical Cosmic Spine. The…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Dark matter haloes superimposed on the density and velocity fields. The top-left panel shows a slice of the density field and on top of it all the FoF haloes closer than 1 h−1 Mpc from the slice. We select a halo inside the central void with a yellow circle (top-left …
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Coherent vs. turbulent velocity field around haloes. Left: a 1h−1Mpc thick slice through the density field of a 32 h−1Mpc box. Center: the velocity field at scales smaller than 125 h−1kpc highlighted using the particle advection visualization technique (see Aragon-Calv…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fractal properties of the cosmic web

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review arguing that the galaxy distribution's fractal dimension is best measured with the structure function, and that the canonical correlation length understates the clustering scale.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The Fractal Geometry of Nature; Echo Point Books & Media, LLC: Brattleboro, VT, USA, 1977

    Mandelbrot, B.B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature; Echo Point Books & Media, LLC: Brattleboro, VT, USA, 1977

    1977

  2. [2]

    How an infinite world may be built up

    Charlier, C.V .L. How an infinite world may be built up. Medd. Fran Lunds Astron. Obs. Ser. I 1922, 98, 1–37

    1922

  3. [3]

    Some Characteristics of Associated Galaxies

    Carpenter, E.F. Some Characteristics of Associated Galaxies. I. a. Density Restriction in the Metagalaxy. Astrophys. J. 1938, 88, 344. https://doi.org/10.1086/143987

    work page doi:10.1086/143987 1938

  4. [4]

    On the clustering of rich clusters of galaxies

    Kiang, T. On the clustering of rich clusters of galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1967, 135,1–22

    1967

  5. [5]

    Newtonian Hierarchical Cosmology

    Wertz, J.R. Newtonian Hierarchical Cosmology. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA, 1970

    1970

  6. [6]

    A Newtonian Big-Bang Hierarchical Cosmological Model.Astrophys

    Wertz, J.R. A Newtonian Big-Bang Hierarchical Cosmological Model.Astrophys. J. 1971, 164, 227. https://doi.org/10.1086/150834

    work page doi:10.1086/150834 1971

  7. [7]

    On the redshift-magnituderelation in hierarchical cosmologies

    Haggerty, M.J.; Wertz, J.R. On the redshift-magnituderelation in hierarchical cosmologies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1972, 155, 495. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/155.4.495

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/155.4.495 1972

  8. [8]

    The Case for a Hierarchical Cosmology.Science1970, 167, 1203–1213

    de V aucouleurs, G. The Case for a Hierarchical Cosmology.Science1970, 167, 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.167.3922.1203

    arXiv

Show all 143 references
  1. [9]

    The Large-Scale Distribution of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies

    de Vaucouleurs, G. The Large-Scale Distribution of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 1971, 83, 113. https://doi.org/10.1086/129088

    1971 doi

  2. [10]

    The fractal structure of the universe: Correlations of galaxies and clusters and the average mass density

    Pietronero, L. The fractal structure of the universe: Correlations of galaxies and clusters and the average mass density. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 1987, 144, 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(87)90191-9

    1987 doi

  3. [11]

    Cosmology’s Century: An Inside History of our Modern Understanding of the Universe ; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2020

    Peebles, P .J.E. Cosmology’s Century: An Inside History of our Modern Understanding of the Universe ; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691201665. Fractal Fract. 2025, 9, 579 29 of 34

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    A Cosmologist’s Reflections on the Search for Objective Reality; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2022

    Peebles, P .J.E.The Whole Truth. A Cosmologist’s Reflections on the Search for Objective Reality; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Dark Matter and Cosmic Web Story, 2nd ed.; World Scientific: Singapore, 2024

    Einasto, J. Dark Matter and Cosmic Web Story, 2nd ed.; World Scientific: Singapore, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity

    Starobinsky, A.A. A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity. Phys. Lett. B 1980, 91, 99–102. https: //doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X

    1980 doi

  7. [15]

    Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems

    Guth, A.H. Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Phys. Rev. D 1981, 23, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347

    1981 doi

  8. [16]

    Chaotic inflation

    Linde, A.D. Chaotic inflation. Phys. Lett. B 1983, 129, 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7

    1983 doi

  9. [17]

    Hybrid inflation

    Linde, A. Hybrid inflation. Phys. Rev. D 1994, 49, 748–754. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.748

    1994 doi

  10. [18]

    Hybrid inflation in supergravity

    Linde, A.; Riotto, A. Hybrid inflation in supergravity. Phys. Rev. D 1997, 56, R1841–R1844. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 56.R1841

    1997 doi

  11. [19]

    Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology

    Linde, A. Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology. arXiv 2005, arXiv:hep-th/0503203. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep- th/0503203

    2005 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    Stochastic approach to chaotic inflation and the distribution of universes

    Nambu, Y.; Sasaki, M. Stochastic approach to chaotic inflation and the distribution of universes. Phys. Lett. B 1989, 219, 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(89)90385-7

    1989 doi

  13. [21]

    Reconstructing the Universe

    Ambjørn, J.; Jurkiewicz, J.; Loll, R. Reconstructing the Universe. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 72, 064014. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.72.064014

    2005

  14. [22]

    Quantum field theory, gravity and cosmology in a fractal universe

    Calcagni, G. Quantum field theory, gravity and cosmology in a fractal universe. J. High Energy Phys. 2010, 2010, 120. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2010)120

    2010 doi

  15. [23]

    Fractal Universe and Quantum Gravity

    Calcagni, G. Fractal Universe and Quantum Gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 251301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.10 4.251301

    2010 doi

  16. [24]

    Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie

    Einstein, A. Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Ann. Der Phys. 1916, 354, 769–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/ andp.19163540702

    1916

  17. [25]

    Über die Möglichkeit einer Welt mit konstanter negativer Krümmung des Raumes

    Friedmann, A. Über die Möglichkeit einer Welt mit konstanter negativer Krümmung des Raumes. Z. Phys. 1924, 21, 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01328280

    1924 doi

  18. [26]

    Un Univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiques

    Lemaître, G. Un Univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiques. Ann. Soc. Scietifique Brux. 1927, 47, 49–59

    1927

  19. [27]

    A New Model for the Expanding Universe

    Hoyle, F. A New Model for the Expanding Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1948, 108, 372–382

    1948

  20. [28]

    Spinning the Cosmic Web; World Scientific: Singapore, 2025

    Einasto, J.; Hütsi, G.; Szapudi, I.; Tenjes, P . Spinning the Cosmic Web; World Scientific: Singapore, 2025

    2025

  21. [29]

    The synthesis of the elements from hydrogen

    Hoyle, F. The synthesis of the elements from hydrogen. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1946, 106, 343. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ 106.5.343

    1946 doi

  22. [30]

    Primordial nucleosynthesis in light of WMAP

    Cyburt, R.H.; Fields, B.D.; Olive, K.A. Primordial nucleosynthesis in light of WMAP. Phys. Lett. B 2003, 567, 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.06.026

    2003 doi

  23. [31]

    Synthesis of the Elements in Stars

    Burbidge, E.M.; Burbidge, G.R.; Fowler, W.A.; Hoyle, F. Synthesis of the Elements in Stars. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1957, 29, 547–650. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547

    1957 doi

  24. [32]

    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations

    Adame, A.G.; Aguilar, J.; Ahlen, S.; Alam, S.; Alexander, D.M.; Alvarez, M.; Alves, O.; Anand, A.; Andrade, U.; Armengaud, E.; et al. DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2025, 2025, 021. http...

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    Signals from the epoch of cosmological recombination (Karl Schwarzschild Award Lecture 2008)

    Sunyaev, R.A.; Chluba, J. Signals from the epoch of cosmological recombination (Karl Schwarzschild Award Lecture 2008). Astron. Nachrichten 2009, 330, 657. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.200911237

    2008 doi

  26. [34]

    Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration.; Aghanim, N.; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Ballardini, M.; Banday, A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; Bartolo, N.; et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    Dynamic Evidence on Massive coronas of galaxies

    Einasto, J.; Kaasik, A.; Saar, E. Dynamic Evidence on Massive coronas of galaxies. Nature 1974, 250, 309–310. https://doi.org/10 .1038/250309a0

    1974

  28. [36]

    The size and mass of galaxies, and the mass of the universe

    Ostriker, J.P .; Peebles, P .J.E.; Yahil, A. The size and mass of galaxies, and the mass of the universe. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1974, 193, L1–L4. https://doi.org/10.1086/181617

    1974 doi

  29. [37]

    Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

    Perlmutter, S.; Aldering, G.; Goldhaber, G.; Knop, R.A.; Nugent, P .; Castro, P .G.; Deustua, S.; Fabbro, S.; Goobar, A.; Groom, D.E.; et al. Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 1999, 517, 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1086/307221

    1999 doi

  30. [38]

    Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant

    Riess, A.G.; Filippenko, A.V .; Challis, P .; Clocchiatti, A.; Diercks, A.; Garnavich, P .M.; Gilliland, R.L.; Hogan, C.J.; Jha, S.; Kirshner, R.P .; et al. Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. Astron. J. 1998, 116, 1...

    1998 doi

  31. [39]

    Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation

    Komatsu, E.; Smith, K.M.; Dunkley, J.; Bennett, C.L.; Gold, B.; Hinshaw, G.; Jarosik, N.; Larson, D.; Nolta, M.R.; Page, L.; et al. Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2011, 192, 18. https://doi...

    2011 doi

  32. [40]

    The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

    Di Valentino, E.; Levi Said, J.; Riess, A.; Pollo, A.; Poulin, V .; Gómez-Valent, A.; Weltman, A.; Palmese, A.; Huang, C.D.; van de Bruck, C.; et al. The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics. arXiv 2025...

    2025 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    Identification of Superclusters and Their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Using the WHL Cluster Catalog

    Sankhyayan, S.; Bagchi, J.; Tempel, E.; More, S.; Einasto, M.; Dabhade, P .; Raychaudhury, S.; Athreya, R.; Heinämäki, P . Identification of Superclusters and Their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Using the WHL Cluster Catalog. Astrophys. J. 2023, 958, 62. https://d...

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary.Astron

    York, D.G.; Adelman, J.; Anderson, Jr., J.E.; Anderson, S.F.; Annis, J.; Bahcall, N.A.; Bakken, J.A.; Barkhouser, R.; Bastian, S.; Berman, E.; et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary.Astron. J.2000, 120, 1579–1587. https://doi.org/10.1086/301513

    doi

  35. [43]

    The distribution of galaxies

    Shane, C.; Wirtanen, C. The distribution of galaxies. Publ. Lick Obs. 1967, 22

    1967

  36. [44]

    New reduction of the Lick catalog of galaxies

    Seldner, M.; Siebers, B.; Groth, E.J.; Peebles, P .J.E. New reduction of the Lick catalog of galaxies. Astron. J. 1977, 82, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1086/112039

    1977 doi

  37. [45]

    A computer model universe—Simulation of the nature of the galaxy distribution in the Lick catalog

    Soneira, R.M.; Peebles, P .J.E. A computer model universe—Simulation of the nature of the galaxy distribution in the Lick catalog. Astron. J. 1978, 83, 845–849. https://doi.org/10.1086/112268

    1978 doi

  38. [46]

    Galaxy correlations on large scales

    Maddox, S.J.; Efstathiou, G.; Sutherland, W.J.; Loveday, J. Galaxy correlations on large scales. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1990, 242, 43. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/242.1.43P

    1990 doi

  39. [47]

    Statistical Analysis of Catalogs of Extragalactic Objects

    Peebles, P .J.E. Statistical Analysis of Catalogs of Extragalactic Objects. I. Theory. Astrophys. J. 1973, 185, 413–440. https: //doi.org/10.1086/152431

    1973 doi

  40. [48]

    Statistical Analysis of Catalogs of Extragalactic Objects

    Hauser, M.G.; Peebles, P .J.E. Statistical Analysis of Catalogs of Extragalactic Objects. II. the Abell Catalog of Rich Clusters. Astrophys. J. 1973, 185, 757–786. https://doi.org/10.1086/152453

    1973 doi

  41. [49]

    Statistical Analysis of Catalogs of Extragalactic Objects

    Peebles, P .J.E.; Hauser, M.G. Statistical Analysis of Catalogs of Extragalactic Objects. III. The Shane-Wirtanen and Zwicky Catalogs. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 1974, 28, 19. https://doi.org/10.1086/190308

    1974 doi

  42. [50]

    Statistical Analysis of Catalogs of Extragalactic Objects

    Peebles, P .J.E. Statistical Analysis of Catalogs of Extragalactic Objects. IV . Cross-Correlation of the Abell and Shane-Wirtanen Catalogs. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 1974, 28, 37. https://doi.org/10.1086/190309

    1974 doi

  43. [51]

    Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects

    Peebles, P .J.E.; Groth, E.J. Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects. V—Three-point correlation function for the galaxy distribution in the Zwicky catalog. Astrophys. J. 1975, 196, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1086/153390

    1975 doi

  44. [52]

    Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects

    Peebles, P .J.E. Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects. VI—The galaxy distribution in the Jagellonian field.Astrophys. J. 1975, 196, 647–651. https://doi.org/10.1086/153450

    1975 doi

  45. [53]

    Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects

    Groth, E.J.; Peebles, P .J.E. Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects. VII. Two- and three-point correlation functions for the high-resolution Shane-Wirtanen catalog of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 1977, 217, 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1086/155588

    1977 doi

  46. [54]

    The Galaxy and Mass N-Point Correlation Functions: A Blast from the Past.Astron

    Peebles, P .J.E. The Galaxy and Mass N-Point Correlation Functions: A Blast from the Past.Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Ser.2001, 252, 201

    2001

  47. [55]

    (Eds.) The Large Scale Structure of the Universe; Proceedings of the Symposium, Tallin, Estonian, SSR, September 12–16, 1977; IAU Symposium; D

    Longair, M.S.; Einasto, J. (Eds.) The Large Scale Structure of the Universe; Proceedings of the Symposium, Tallin, Estonian, SSR, September 12–16, 1977; IAU Symposium; D. Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1978; Volume 79

    1977

  48. [56]

    The cell structure of the Universe

    Jõeveer, M.; Einasto, J.; Tago, E. The cell structure of the Universe. Tartu Astr. Obs. Preprint 1977, A-1, 3–46

    1977

  49. [57]

    A Tour of the Local Supercluster

    Tully, R.B.; Fisher, J.R. A Tour of the Local Supercluster. In Large Scale Structures in the Universe; Longair, M.S., Einasto, J., Eds.; IAU Symposium; D. Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1978; Volume 79, pp. 214–216

    1978

  50. [58]

    The Coma/A1367 supercluster and its environs

    Gregory, S.A.; Thompson, L.A. The Coma/A1367 supercluster and its environs. Astrophys. J. 1978, 222, 784–799. https: //doi.org/10.1086/156198

    1978 doi

  51. [59]

    Has the universe the cell structure

    Jõeveer, M.; Einasto, J. Has the universe the cell structure. In Large Scale Structures in the Universe; Longair, M.S., Einasto, J., Eds.; IAU Symposium; D. Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1978; Volume 79, pp. 241–250

    1978

  52. [60]

    Two-dimensional simulation of the gravitational system dynamics and formation of the large-scale structure of the universe

    Doroshkevich, A.G.; Kotok, E.V .; Poliudov, A.N.; Shandarin, S.F.; Sigov, I.S.; Novikov, I.D. Two-dimensional simulation of the gravitational system dynamics and formation of the large-scale structure of the universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1980, 192, 321–337

    1980

  53. [61]

    Gravitational instability: An approximate theory for large density perturbations

    Zeldovich, Y.B. Gravitational instability: An approximate theory for large density perturbations. Astron. Astrophys. 1970, 5, 84–89

    1970

  54. [62]

    How filaments of galaxies are woven into the cosmic web

    Bond, J.R.; Kofman, L.; Pogosyan, D. How filaments of galaxies are woven into the cosmic web. Nature 1996, 380, 603–606. https://doi.org/10.1038/380603a0

    1996 doi

  55. [63]

    The spatial correlation function of rich clusters of galaxies

    Bahcall, N.A.; Soneira, R.M. The spatial correlation function of rich clusters of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 1983, 270, 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/161094

    1983 doi

  56. [64]

    The Spatial Covariance Function for Rich Clusters of Galaxies

    Klypin, A.A.; Kopylov, A.I. The Spatial Covariance Function for Rich Clusters of Galaxies. Sov. Astron. Lett. 1983, 9, 41

    1983

  57. [65]

    On the spatial correlations of Abell clusters

    Kaiser, N. On the spatial correlations of Abell clusters. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1984, 284, L9–L12. https://doi.org/10.1086/184341

    1984 doi

  58. [66]

    Are galaxies more strongly correlated than clusters? Nature 1985, 314, 718–719

    Szalay, A.S.; Schramm, D.N. Are galaxies more strongly correlated than clusters? Nature 1985, 314, 718–719. https://doi.org/10.1 038/314718a0. Fractal Fract. 2025, 9, 579 31 of 34

    1985

  59. [67]

    Structure of superclusters and supercluster formation

    Einasto, J.; Saar, E.; Klypin, A.A. Structure of superclusters and supercluster formation. V—Spatial correlation and voids. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1986, 219, 457–478

    1986

  60. [68]

    Multifractal description of the large-scale structure of the universe.Astrophys

    Jones, B.J.T.; Martinez, V .J.; Saar, E.; Einasto, J. Multifractal description of the large-scale structure of the universe.Astrophys. J. Lett. 1988, 332, L1–L5. https://doi.org/10.1086/185254

    1988 doi

  61. [69]

    Formation of the structure in an axion Universe with a cosmological constant

    Gramann, M. Formation of the structure in an axion Universe with a cosmological constant. Tartu Astr. Obs. Publ. 1987, 52, 216–255

    1987

  62. [70]

    Structure and formation of superclusters

    Gramann, M. Structure and formation of superclusters. VIII—Evolution of structure in a model with cold dark matter and cosmological constant. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1988, 234, 569–582

    1988

  63. [71]

    Discussion Panel: Fractal Large Scale Structures and Crossover to Homogeneity: The Mass-Radius Function versus the Correlations, and the Measurement of the Corrrelation Range

    Mandelbrot, B.B. Discussion Panel: Fractal Large Scale Structures and Crossover to Homogeneity: The Mass-Radius Function versus the Correlations, and the Measurement of the Corrrelation Range. In Large Scale Structures of the Universe; Audouze, J., Pelletan, M.C., Szalay, A., ...

    1988

  64. [72]

    The Fractal Geometry of Nature; Freeman: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1982

    Mandelbrot, B.B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature; Freeman: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1982

    1982

  65. [73]

    Early Evolution of the Universe and Its Present Structure; IAU Symposium; D

    Abell, G.O.; Chincarini, G., Eds. Early Evolution of the Universe and Its Present Structure; IAU Symposium; D. Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1983; Volume 104

    1983

  66. [74]

    Observational and Analytical Methods

    Audouze, J.; Pelletan, M.C.; Szalay, A.; Zel’dovich, Y.B.; Peebles, P .J.E., Eds.Large-Scale Structures in the Universe. Observational and Analytical Methods. Proceedings of the 130th Symposium of the International Astronomical Union, Dedicated to the Memory of Marc A. Aaronso...

    1950

  67. [75]

    The Zeldovich Universe: Genesis and Growth of the Cosmic Web; IAU Symposium; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016; Volume 308

    van de Weygaert, R.; Shandarin, S.; Saar, E.; Einasto, J., Eds. The Zeldovich Universe: Genesis and Growth of the Cosmic Web; IAU Symposium; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016; Volume 308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174392131601098X

    2016 doi

  68. [76]

    Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe

    Peebles, P .J.E.; Yu, J.T. Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe. Astrophys. J. 1970, 162, 815–836. https: //doi.org/10.1086/150713

    1970 doi

  69. [77]

    The large scale structure of the universe I

    Arnold, V .I.; Shandarin, S.F.; Zeldovich, I.B. The large scale structure of the universe I. General properties. One-and two- dimensional models. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 1982, 20, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091928208209001

    1982 doi

  70. [78]

    Why the universe is not a fractal

    Martinez, V .J.; Jones, B.J.T. Why the universe is not a fractal. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1990, 242, 517–521

    1990

  71. [79]

    Statistics of the Galaxy Distribution; Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002

    Martínez, V .J.; Saar, E. Statistics of the Galaxy Distribution; Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002

    2002

  72. [80]

    Galaxies: Fractal Dimensions, Counts in Cells, and Correlations

    Balian, R.; Schaeffer, R. Galaxies: Fractal Dimensions, Counts in Cells, and Correlations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1988, 335, L43. https://doi.org/10.1086/185336

    1988 doi

  73. [81]

    Scale-invariant matter distribution in the universe

    Balian, R.; Schaeffer, R. Scale-invariant matter distribution in the universe. II—Bifractal behaviour. Astron. Astrophys. 1989, 226, 373–414

    1989

  74. [82]

    Determination of “inos” Masses Composing Galactic Halos

    Song, D.J.; Ruffini, R. Determination of “inos” Masses Composing Galactic Halos. In Observational Cosmology; Hewitt, A., Burbidge, G., Fang, L.Z., Eds.; IAU Symposium; D. Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1987; Volume 124, p. 723

    1987

  75. [83]

    The ’ino’ mass and the cellular large-scale structure of the universe

    Ruffini, R.; Song, D.J.; Taraglio, S. The ’ino’ mass and the cellular large-scale structure of the universe. Astron. Astrophys. 1988, 190, 1–9

    1988

  76. [84]

    The Correlation Function of Galaxies in the Direction of the Coma Cluster

    Calzetti, D.; Einasto, J.; Giavalisco, M.; Ruffini, R.; Saar, E. The Correlation Function of Galaxies in the Direction of the Coma Cluster. Astrophys. Space Sci. 1987, 137, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00641624

    1987 doi

  77. [85]

    The normalization of the correlation functions for extragalactic structures

    Calzetti, D.; Giavalisco, M.; Ruffini, R. The normalization of the correlation functions for extragalactic structures. Astron. Astrophys. 1988, 198, 1–15

    1988

  78. [86]

    The Fractal Distribution of Galaxies and the Transition to Homogeneity

    Gaite, J.; Domínguez, A.; Pérez-Mercader, J. The Fractal Distribution of Galaxies and the Transition to Homogeneity. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1999, 522, L5–L8. https://doi.org/10.1086/312204

    1999 doi

  79. [87]

    Smooth halos in the cosmic web

    Gaite, J. Smooth halos in the cosmic web. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2015, 2015, 020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/0 4/020

    2015 doi

  80. [88]

    The Fractal Geometry of the Cosmic Web and Its Formation

    Gaite, J. The Fractal Geometry of the Cosmic Web and Its Formation. Adv. Astron. 2019, 2019, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1155/20 19/6587138

    2019 doi

  81. [89]

    The fractal galaxy distribution

    Peebles, P .J.E. The fractal galaxy distribution. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 1989, 38, 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-278 9(89)90205-4

    1989 doi

  82. [90]

    https://doi.org/10.1515/97 80691206721

    Peebles, P .J.E.Principles of Physical Cosmology; Prinseton University Press: Prinseton, NJ, USA, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1515/97 80691206721

    1993 doi

  83. [91]

    On the Fractal Structure of the Visible Universe

    Pietronero, L.; Montuori, M.; Sylos Labini, F. On the Fractal Structure of the Visible Universe. In Critical Dialogues in Cosmology; Turok, N., Ed.; World Scientific, Singapore; 1997; . 24–49, . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9611197

    1997 doi arXiv

  84. [92]

    Fractal Structures and the Large Scale Distribution of Galaxies

    Pietronero, L.; Sylos Labini, F. Fractal Structures and the Large Scale Distribution of Galaxies. InCurrent Topics in Astrofundamental Physics: The Cosmic Microwave Background; Sánchez, N.G., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands; 2001; p. 391–437. https:...

    2001 doi arXiv

  85. [93]

    Finite size effects on the galaxy number counts: Evidence for fractal behavior up to the deepest scale

    Sylos Labini, F.; Gabrielli, A.; Montuori, M.; Pietronero, L. Finite size effects on the galaxy number counts: Evidence for fractal behavior up to the deepest scale. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 1996, 226, 195–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(96)00021-0

    1996 doi

  86. [94]

    Scaling in the Universe

    Borgani, S. Scaling in the Universe. Phys. Rep. 1995, 251, 1–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(94)00073-C

    1995 doi

  87. [95]

    Critical Dialogues in Cosmology; World Scientific: Singapore, 1997

    Turok, N., Ed. Critical Dialogues in Cosmology; World Scientific: Singapore, 1997

    1997

  88. [96]

    Is the Universe Homogeneous on Large Scales? In Critical Dialogues in Cosmology; Turok, N., Ed.; World Scientific: Singapore, 1997; 13–23

    Davis, M. Is the Universe Homogeneous on Large Scales? In Critical Dialogues in Cosmology; Turok, N., Ed.; World Scientific: Singapore, 1997; 13–23. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9610149

    1997 doi arXiv

  89. [97]

    Five decades of missing matter

    de Swart, J.G. Five decades of missing matter. Phys. Today 2024, 77, 24–43

    2024

  90. [98]

    Giant voids in the universe.Nature1982, 300, 407–413

    Zeldovich, Y .B.; Einasto, J.; Shandarin, S.F. Giant voids in the universe.Nature1982, 300, 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1038/300407a0

    doi

  91. [99]

    Three-dimensional numerical model of the formation of large-scale structure in the Universe

    Klypin, A.A.; Shandarin, S.F. Three-dimensional numerical model of the formation of large-scale structure in the Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1983, 204, 891–907

    1983

  92. [100]

    Are Clusters of Galaxies Stable? Astron

    van den Bergh, S. Are Clusters of Galaxies Stable? Astron. J. 1962, 67, 285. https://doi.org/10.1086/108724

    1962 doi

  93. [101]

    Large-scale background temperature and mass fluctuations due to scale-invariant primeval perturbations.Astrophys

    Peebles, P .J.E. Large-scale background temperature and mass fluctuations due to scale-invariant primeval perturbations.Astrophys. J. Lett. 1982, 263, L1–L5. https://doi.org/10.1086/183911

    1982 doi

  94. [102]

    Cluster analysis of the nonlinear evolution of large-scale structure in an axion/gravitino/photino-dominated universe

    Melott, A.L.; Einasto, J.; Saar, E.; Suisalu, I.; Klypin, A.A.; Shandarin, S.F. Cluster analysis of the nonlinear evolution of large-scale structure in an axion/gravitino/photino-dominated universe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 51, 935–938. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.51.935

    1983

  95. [103]

    Three-dimensional simulation of large-scale structure in the universe

    Centrella, J.; Melott, A.L. Three-dimensional simulation of large-scale structure in the universe. Nature 1983, 305, 196–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/305196a0

    1983 doi

  96. [104]

    Peebles, P .J.E.The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe; Princeton Series in Physics; Prinseton University Press: Prinseton, NJ, USA, 1980

    1980

  97. [105]

    Clustering in real space and in redshift space

    Kaiser, N. Clustering in real space and in redshift space. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1987, 227, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/227.1.1

    1987

  98. [106]

    A survey of galaxy redshifts

    Davis, M.; Peebles, P .J.E. A survey of galaxy redshifts. V . The two-point position and velocity correlations.Astrophys. J. 1983, 267, 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/160884

    1983 doi

  99. [107]

    The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Luminosity dependence of galaxy clustering

    Norberg, P .; Baugh, C.M.; Hawkins, E.; Maddox, S.; Peacock, J.A.; Cole, S.; Frenk, C.S.; Bland-Hawthorn, J.; Bridges, T.; Cannon, R.; et al. The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Luminosity dependence of galaxy clustering. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2001, 328, 64–70. https://doi.org...

    2001

  100. [108]

    The Luminosity and Color Dependence of the Galaxy Correlation Function

    Zehavi, I.; Zheng, Z.; Weinberg, D.H.; Frieman, J.A.; Berlind, A.A.; Blanton, M.R.; Scoccimarro, R.; Sheth, R.K.; Strauss, M.A.; Kayo, I.; et al. The Luminosity and Color Dependence of the Galaxy Correlation Function. Astrophys. J. 2005, 630, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1086/431891

    2005 doi

  101. [109]

    Galaxy Clustering in the Completed SDSS Redshift Survey: The Dependence on Color and Luminosity

    Zehavi, I.; Zheng, Z.; Weinberg, D.H.; Blanton, M.R.; Bahcall, N.A.; Berlind, A.A.; Brinkmann, J.; Frieman, J.A.; Gunn, J.E.; Lupton, R.H.; et al. Galaxy Clustering in the Completed SDSS Redshift Survey: The Dependence on Color and Luminosity. Astrophys. J. 2011, 736, 59. http...

    2011 doi

  102. [110]

    The fractal structure of the universe.Phys

    Coleman, P .H.; Pietronero, L. The fractal structure of the universe.Phys. Rep. 1992, 213, 311–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1 573(92)90112-D

    1992 doi

  103. [111]

    Absence of any characteristic correlation length in the CfA galaxy catalogue

    Coleman, P .H.; Pietronero, L.; Sanders, R.H. Absence of any characteristic correlation length in the CfA galaxy catalogue. Astron. Astrophys. 1988, 200, L32–L34

    1988

  104. [112]

    Characterizing the nonlinear growth of large-scale structure in the Universe

    Coles, P .; Chiang, L. Characterizing the nonlinear growth of large-scale structure in the Universe. Nature 2000, 406, 376–378. https://doi.org/10.1038/35019009

    2000 doi

  105. [113]

    The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Final Data Release

    Colless, M.; Peterson, B.A.; Jackson, C.; Peacock, J.A.; Cole, S.; Norberg, P .; Baldry, I.K.; Baugh, C.M.; Bland-Hawthorn, J.; Bridges, T.; et al. The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Final Data Release. arXiv 2003, arXiv:astro–ph/0306581. https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0306581

    2003 doi

  106. [114]

    The Eighth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First Data from SDSS-III

    Aihara, H.; Allende Prieto, C.; An, D.; Anderson, S.F.; Aubourg, É.; Balbinot, E.; Beers, T.C.; Berlind, A.A.; Bickerton, S.J.; Bizyaev, D.; et al. The Eighth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First Data from SDSS-III. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2011, 193, 29. https://do...

    2011 doi

  107. [115]

    The Eleventh and Twelfth Data Releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Final Data from SDSS-III

    Alam, S.; Albareti, F.D.; Allende Prieto, C.; Anders, F.; Anderson, S.F.; Anderton, T.; Andrews, B.H.; Armengaud, E.; Aubourg, É.; Bailey, S.; et al. The Eleventh and Twelfth Data Releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Final Data from SDSS-III. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2015, 21...

    2015 doi

  108. [116]

    The Three-Dimensional Power Spectrum of Galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

    Tegmark, M.; Blanton, M.R.; Strauss, M.A.; Hoyle, F.; Schlegel, D.; Scoccimarro, R.; Vogeley, M.S.; Weinberg, D.H.; Zehavi, I.; Berlind, A.; et al. The Three-Dimensional Power Spectrum of Galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astrophys. J. 2004, 606, 702–740. https://doi...

    2004 doi

  109. [117]

    Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars

    Springel, V .; White, S.D.M.; Jenkins, A.; Frenk, C.S.; Yoshida, N.; Gao, L.; Navarro, J.; Thacker, R.; Croton, D.; Helly, J.; et al. Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars. Nature 2005, 435, 629–636. https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature03597...

    2005 doi

  110. [118]

    First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: Matter and galaxy clustering

    Springel, V .; Pakmor, R.; Pillepich, A.; Weinberger, R.; Nelson, D.; Hernquist, L.; Vogelsberger, M.; Genel, S.; Torrey, P .; Marinacci, F.; et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: Matter and galaxy clustering. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 475, 676–698. htt...

    2018 doi

  111. [119]

    Correlation function: Biasing and fractal properties of the cosmic web

    Einasto, J.; Hütsi, G.; Kuutma, T.; Einasto, M. Correlation function: Biasing and fractal properties of the cosmic web. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 640, A47. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037683

    2020 doi

  112. [120]

    Correlation functions in 2D and 3D as descriptors of the cosmic web

    Einasto, J.; Hütsi, G.; Einasto, M. Correlation functions in 2D and 3D as descriptors of the cosmic web. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 652, A152. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038106

    2021 doi

  113. [121]

    Core condensation in heavy halos—A two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering

    White, S.D.M.; Rees, M.J. Core condensation in heavy halos—A two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1978, 183, 341–358

    1978

  114. [122]

    A three-dimensional hydrodynamic treatment of the hot dark matter cosmological scenario.Astrophys

    Cen, R.; Ostriker, J.P . A three-dimensional hydrodynamic treatment of the hot dark matter cosmological scenario.Astrophys. J. 1992, 399, 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1086/171930

    1992 doi

  115. [123]

    A Gravitational Ising Model for the Statistical Bias of Galaxies

    Repp, A.; Szapudi, I. A Gravitational Ising Model for the Statistical Bias of Galaxies. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1904.05048

    2019 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Flux- and volume-limited groups/clusters for the SDSS galaxies: catalogues and mass estimation

    Tempel, E.; Tamm, A.; Gramann, M.; Tuvikene, T.; Liivamägi, L.J.; Suhhonenko, I.; Kipper, R.; Einasto, M.; Saar, E. Flux- and volume-limited groups/clusters for the SDSS galaxies: catalogues and mass estimation. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 566, A1. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-63...

    2014 doi

  117. [125]

    The Tenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First Spectroscopic Data from the SDSS-III Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment

    Ahn, C.P .; Alexandroff, R.; Allende Prieto, C.; Anders, F.; Anderson, S.F.; Anderton, T.; Andrews, B.H.; Aubourg, É.; Bailey, S.; Bastien, F.A.; et al. The Tenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First Spectroscopic Data from the SDSS-III Apache Point Observatory ...

    2014 doi

  118. [126]

    SDSS DR7 superclusters

    Liivamägi, L.J.; Tempel, E.; Saar, E. SDSS DR7 superclusters. The catalogues. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 539, A80. https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201016288

    2012 doi

  119. [127]

    The many lives of active galactic nuclei: Cooling flows, black holes and the luminosities and colours of galaxies

    Croton, D.J.; Springel, V .; White, S.D.M.; De Lucia, G.; Frenk, C.S.; Gao, L.; Jenkins, A.; Kauffmann, G.; Navarro, J.F.; Yoshida, N. The many lives of active galactic nuclei: Cooling flows, black holes and the luminosities and colours of galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2...

    2006

  120. [128]

    The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: Public release of halo and galaxy catalogues

    McAlpine, S.; Helly, J.C.; Schaller, M.; Trayford, J.W.; Qu, Y.; Furlong, M.; Bower, R.G.; Crain, R.A.; Schaye, J.; Theuns, T.; et al. The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: Public release of halo and galaxy catalogues. Astron. Comput. 2016, 15, 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1...

    2016 doi

  121. [129]

    On Departures from a Power Law in the Galaxy Correlation Function

    Zehavi, I.; Weinberg, D.H.; Zheng, Z.; Berlind, A.A.; Frieman, J.A.; Scoccimarro, R.; Sheth, R.K.; Blanton, M.R.; Tegmark, M.; Mo, H.J.; et al. On Departures from a Power Law in the Galaxy Correlation Function. Astrophys. J. 2004, 608, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/386535

    2004 doi

  122. [130]

    A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering

    Navarro, J.F.; Frenk, C.S.; White, S.D.M. A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering. Astrophys. J. 1997, 490, 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1086/304888

    1997 doi

  123. [131]

    Universal structure of dark matter haloes over a mass range of 20 orders of magnitude

    Wang, J.; Bose, S.; Frenk, C.S.; Gao, L.; Jenkins, A.; Springel, V .; White, S.D.M. Universal structure of dark matter haloes over a mass range of 20 orders of magnitude. Nature 2020, 585, 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2642-9

    2020 doi

  124. [132]

    The Hierarchical Structure and Dynamics of Voids

    Aragon-Calvo, M.A.; Szalay, A.S. The Hierarchical Structure and Dynamics of Voids. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013, 428, 3409–3424

    2013

  125. [133]

    Galaxy Quenching from Cosmic Web Detachment

    Aragon Calvo, M.A.; Neyrinck, M.C.; Silk, J. Galaxy Quenching from Cosmic Web Detachment. Open J. Astrophys. 2019, 2, 7. https://doi.org/10.21105/astro.1697.07881

    2019

  126. [134]

    A million cubic megaparsec void in Bootes.Astrophys

    Kirshner, R.P .; Oemler, Jr., A.; Schechter, P .L.; Shectman, S.A. A million cubic megaparsec void in Bootes.Astrophys. J. Lett. 1981, 248, L57–L60. https://doi.org/10.1086/183623

    1981 doi

  127. [135]

    Cosmic voids in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7.Mon

    Pan, D.C.; Vogeley, M.S.; Hoyle, F.; Choi, Y.Y.; Park, C. Cosmic voids in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 421, 926–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20197.x

    2012

  128. [136]

    A Public Void Catalog from the SDSS DR7 Galaxy Redshift Surveys Based on the Watershed Transform

    Sutter, P .M.; Lavaux, G.; Wandelt, B.D.; Weinberg, D.H. A Public Void Catalog from the SDSS DR7 Galaxy Redshift Surveys Based on the Watershed Transform. Astrophys. J. 2012, 761, 44. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/44

    2012 doi

  129. [137]

    A robust public catalogue of voids and superclusters in the SDSS Data Release 7 galaxy surveys

    Nadathur, S.; Hotchkiss, S. A robust public catalogue of voids and superclusters in the SDSS Data Release 7 galaxy surveys. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 440, 1248–1262. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu349

    2014 doi

  130. [138]

    A hierarchy of voids: Much ado about nothing

    Sheth, R.K.; van de Weygaert, R. A hierarchy of voids: Much ado about nothing. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2004, 350, 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07661.x

    2004

  131. [139]

    Large-scale cosmic homogeneity from a multifractal analysis of the PSCz catalogue.Mon

    Pan, J.; Coles, P . Large-scale cosmic homogeneity from a multifractal analysis of the PSCz catalogue.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2000, 318, L51–L54. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03965.x

  132. [140]

    The scale of homogeneity of the galaxy distribution in SDSS DR6.Mon

    Sarkar, P .; Yadav, J.; Pandey, B.; Bharadwaj, S. The scale of homogeneity of the galaxy distribution in SDSS DR6.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2009, 399, L128–L131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00738.x

    2009

  133. [141]

    The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: The transition to large-scale cosmic homogeneity

    Scrimgeour, M.I.; Davis, T.; Blake, C.; James, J.B.; Poole, G.B.; Staveley-Smith, L.; Brough, S.; Colless, M.; Contreras, C.; Couch, W.; et al. The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: The transition to large-scale cosmic homogeneity. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 425, 116–134. https...

    2012

  134. [142]

    In search for the Local Universe dynamical homogeneity scale with CF4++ peculiar velocities

    Courtois, H.M.; Mould, J.; Hollinger, A.M.; Dupuy, A.; Zhang, C.P . In search for the Local Universe dynamical homogeneity scale with CF4++ peculiar velocities. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.01308. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.01308

    2025 doi

  135. [143]

    Large SDSS Quasar Groups and Their Statistical Significance

    Park, C.; Song, H.; Einasto, M.; Lietzen, H.; Heinamaki, P . Large SDSS Quasar Groups and Their Statistical Significance. J. Korean Astron. Soc. 2015, 48, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.5303/JKAS.2015.48.1.75. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained...

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.