Entire conformal curves are affine or have super-Euclidean energy growth

Toni Ikonen

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 26 references

Entire conformal curves are affine or have super-Euclidean energy growth

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that entire conformal curves with bounded energy growth are affine, while every non-affine such curve has strictly increasing, unbounded average energy.

desk verdict A likely-correct and useful dichotomy for conformal curves, but the proof as written has a normalization conflation in the key growth lemma that must be repaired. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04414 v1 pith:IGDLHRR5 submitted 2025-09-04 math.DG math.CV

Toni Ikonen This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DGmath.CV MSC 30C6549Q1553C65

keywords conformalcurvescalibratedgeometryisoperimetricinequalityintegralcurrentsquasiregularenergygrowthLiouvilletheoremblow-downargument

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a dichotomy for entire conformal curves, maps $F:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^m$ that solve a generalized Cauchy–Riemann equation relative to a constant-coefficient calibration form $\omega$. The dichotomy: either $F$ is affine linear, or the average energy in a ball is strictly increasing for all sufficiently large radii and diverges to infinity. In particular, bounded energy growth forces affinity, extending the classical fact that an entire holomorphic function with bounded complex differential is affine. This matters because it shows that calibrated geometry itself, not just complex analysis, enforces a sharp rigidity/growth alternative, and it constrains the submanifolds through which such curves can factor.

What carries the argument

The engine is the average energy $h(r)$, shown non-decreasing by combining the conformal curve equation (1.5), the sharp isoperimetric inequality for integral currents (the paper's cited Theorem 4.1), and Hölder's inequality. When $h$ has bounded limit, normalized blow-downs $F_j(y)=(F(y_j+r_j y)-F(y_j))/r_j$ are $1$-Lipschitz and converge by Arzelà–Ascoli to a limiting conformal curve $G$ with unit average energy on $B_1$; the monotonicity lemma then forces $G$ to be an affine isometry. Properness follows, the pushforward $T=F_\#[\mathbb{R}^n]$ is an $\omega$-calibrated integral cycle, and the classical monotonicity formula for integral currents forces equality $\|T\|(B_r(F(x_0)))=\omega_n r^n$ for every $r$, so the support of $T$—and hence the image of $F$—is an affine subspace.

What would settle it

Find a calibration $\omega$ and a non-affine entire conformal $\omega$-curve whose average energy $h(r)$ is bounded; or exhibit a conformal curve and calibration for which the inequality (3.1) fails at some radius. Either would directly contradict Theorem 1.1 or Lemma 3.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for every calibration $\omega\in\Lambda^n\mathbb{R}^m$ and every conformal $\omega$-curve $F:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^m$ with bounded asymptotic growth—meaning the limit of the average energy $h(r)=\frac{1}{\omega_n r^n}\int_{B_r(x_0)}\|DF\|^n\,dx$ is finite—the map $F$ is affine linear. Combined with the monotonicity of $h$, this gives Corollary 1.2: every non-affine conformal $\omega$-curve has unbounded average energy that is strictly increasing for large radii. The proof is a blow-down argument: rescalings of $F$ converge to an affine isometry, forcing properness and, via the pushforward of the fundamental cycle, equality in the monotonicity formula for every ball, so the image is an affine subspace. The paper also proves Theorem 1.4: a non-constant conformal curve that factors through a connected smooth $n$-dimensional submanifold forces that submanifold to be $\omega$-calibrated and conformally equivalent to a non-compact quotient of $\mathbb{R}^n$ (for $n\ge 3$, a conformal covering map onto a flat oriented manifold).

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument rests on the sharp isoperimetric inequality for conformal curves, which says that the spherical average of $\|DF\|^{n-1}$ raised to $n/(n-1)$ dominates the ball integral of $\|DF\|^n$; if this estimate failed for some calibration, average energy need not be monotone, and the blow-down limit need not be affine.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every entire Lipschitz conformal curve is affine, because bounded asymptotic growth is equivalent to a Lipschitz bound via (1.6) and (1.7).
Any non-affine conformal curve has unbounded average energy and strictly increasing average energy for large radii; consequently its image has super-linear diameter growth by the Caccioppoli-type inequality (2.1).
In potential-theoretic terms for $n\ge 3$, either $F$ is affine or $\|DF\|$ fails to lie in $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$ for every $p\in [(n-2)/2,\infty)$.
Factorization rigidity: a non-constant entire conformal curve can factor through an $n$-dimensional submanifold only if that submanifold is calibrated and conformally equivalent to a non-compact flat quotient of $\mathbb{R}^n$; compact or spherical targets are excluded.
Sharpness examples remain: for $n\ge 2$ there exist conformal curves with super-Euclidean growth, and for $n=2$ the complex exponential shows the covering-map conclusion fails.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The blow-down argument suggests that every bounded-growth conformal curve has a unique asymptotic linear isometry; the rate of convergence to this isometry could refine the dichotomy into quantitative growth classes, a direction the paper does not explore.
If the isoperimetric monotonicity survives the two-sided comparability in quasiregular curves, a similar trivial-or-infinite-energy alternative may hold for that larger class, though likely with constants replacing exact rigidity.
The theorem leaves open how slowly the average energy of a non-affine curve can diverge; the exponential example grows rapidly, but the proof only yields unboundedness, so constructing a non-affine conformal curve with very slow (e.g., logarithmic) energy divergence would sharpen the result.
The factorization theorem connects conformal curve theory to quasiregular ellipticity: for conformal curves the target geometry is forced to be a flat quotient, not merely cohomologically restricted, suggesting that the punctured cone over a Legendrian torus is a minimal non-flat obstruction.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know upfront. The main theorem — entire conformal curves with bounded asymptotic growth are affine — is a clean generalization of the IP24 result from a G_delta-dense set of calibrations to all constant-coefficient calibrations, and the blow-down strategy is genuinely new. But the written proof of the key growth lemma has a normalization conflation that reaches into the blow-down argument. It is fixable, but as it stands the proof of the dichotomy doesn't actually go through.

What the paper does well: it sets up the problem carefully, the dichotomy in Corollary 1.2 is sharp and useful, and the factorization theorem (Theorem 1.4) is a nice structural result that stands on its own. The use of the sharp isoperimetric inequality for currents is coherent, and the citations to the author's prior work are legitimate — the target theorem does not reduce to those results by a change of notation.

Now the soft spots. The stress-test note is right. In (1.6) h is defined as the unnormalized integral ∫_{B_r} ||DF||^n dx. The derivative formula in Lemma 3.1 is for the normalized average energy, up to a factor. The Hölder step silently drops the H(∂B_r) factor; combined with what looks like a missing Almgren constant in (3.1), the chain of inequalities that gives h' ≥ 0 is not valid as displayed. More seriously, Lemma 4.1 assumes 1 = lim ∫_{B_{r_j}(y_j)} ||DF||^n. Under the unnormalized definition, the rescaled maps F_j have energy going to zero on B_1, so the limit cannot be a linear isometry. Under the normalized definition, the hypothesis should be lim ω_n^{-1} r_j^{-n} ∫_{B_{r_j}} ||DF||^n = 1. The author likely meant the latter; the proof and statements need a consistent normalization. These are not just cosmetic — Lemma 4.1 and Corollary 4.2 feed directly into Theorem 1.1.

I don't think the underlying result is wrong. The strategy is standard once the normalization is right, and the author's previous work supplies the missing estimates. But a referee should insist on a corrected version of Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 4.1 before endorsing the paper. The factorization theorem appears fine, though the n=2 case is terse.

Bottom line: this is a solid contribution to conformal and calibrated geometry, worth peer review, but it needs careful revision. I would bring it to a reading group to work through the normalization issue; it is instructive.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a dichotomy for entire conformal ω-curves F: R^n → R^m (2 ≤ n ≤ m) with respect to a constant-coefficient calibration ω: either F is affine, or its average energy in balls is unbounded and strictly increasing for all sufficiently large radii. The proof combines a monotonicity lemma for the averaged Dirichlet energy, obtained from Almgren's sharp isoperimetric inequality for integral currents, with a blow-down analysis showing that any blow-down limit of a curve with bounded asymptotic growth is a linear isometry. The author also proves that every entire Lipschitz conformal curve is affine (Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2), and establishes a structural result for curves that factor through an n-dimensional submanifold (Theorem 1.4).

Significance. If the proof is completed, the main theorem is a strong and elegant rigidity statement: bounded asymptotic growth forces affinity, and every non-affine conformal curve has super-Euclidean energy growth. This generalizes the classical fact that a bounded entire holomorphic function is constant and the statement that an entire holomorphic function with bounded complex differential is affine. The use of calibrated geometry and the sharp isoperimetric inequality is natural and likely to be of interest to researchers in geometric analysis and quasiregular mappings. A notable strength is that the paper makes concrete, falsifiable predictions (e.g., the dichotomy for all calibrations) and builds on a substantial body of prior work. However, the current manuscript contains several load-bearing normalization and inequality errors that must be repaired before the results can be accepted.

major comments (3)

[§1.2, Eq. (1.6); §3, Lemma 3.1] The function h(r) is defined inconsistently. In Eq. (1.6) and in Lemma 3.1 it is defined as h(r) = ∫_{B_r(x0)} ||DF||^n dx, but the derivative formula displayed in Lemma 3.1 and the monotonicity argument are only correct for the normalized average energy E(r) = (1/(ω_n r^n)) ∫_{B_r(x0)} ||DF||^n dx. With the printed definition, the derivative of h is simply h'(r) = ∫_{∂B_r} ||DF||^n dH^{n-1}, not the expression with the factor 1/(ω_n r^n) and the subtraction term. Moreover, the phrase 'bounded asymptotic growth' as the limit of the unnormalized integral is meaningless for nonconstant affine maps, for which ∫_{B_r} ||DF||^n grows like r^n. This notational error affects the statement of Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2 and must be corrected globally by using the normalized average energy throughout.
[§3, Lemma 3.1, Hölder step and Eq. (3.1)] The displayed Hölder inequality ∫_{∂B_r} ||DF||^n dH ≥ (∫_{∂B_r} ||DF||^{n-1} dH)^{n/(n-1)} is false for unnormalized surface measure. The correct inequality contains a factor H^{n-1}(∂B_r)^{-1/(n-1)} on the right-hand side. Consequently, the derivation of h'(r) ≥ 0 as written is invalid. The subsequent invocation of [IP24, Theorem 4.1] in (3.1) also appears to omit the sharp isoperimetric constant and the necessary normalization; even with the corrected Hölder inequality, the displayed chain does not establish the claimed inequality. This is a load-bearing gap because the monotonicity lemma is the foundation for the blow-down argument, Corollary 1.2, and Theorem 1.1.
[§4, Lemma 4.1] The hypothesis of Lemma 4.1 is incompatible with the conclusion. If 1 = lim_j ∫_{B_{r_j}(y_j)} ||DF||^n dx with r_j → ∞, then for the rescaled maps F_j(y) = (F(y_j+r_j y)-F(y_j))/r_j one has ∫_{B_1} ||DF_j||^n dy = r_j^{-n} ∫_{B_{r_j}(y_j)} ||DF||^n dx → 0, so any uniform limit G satisfies ∫_{B_1} ||DG||^n = 0 and is constant, not a linear isometry. The intended hypothesis is lim_j ω_n^{-1} r_j^{-n} ∫_{B_{r_j}(y_j)} ||DF||^n dx = 1 (or the equivalent unnormalized form with the correct scaling), and the proof must be adjusted accordingly. Since Corollary 4.2 and Theorem 1.1 both rely on Lemma 4.1, this normalization conflation is a serious, though repairable, flaw.

minor comments (4)

[§4, Proof of Theorem 1.1] The displayed inequality chain contains a missing normalization factor: the term (S_r/r)^n ∫_{B_{S_r}(x0)} ||DF||^n dx should read (S_r/r)^n (1/(ω_n S_r^n)) ∫_{B_{S_r}(x0)} ||DF||^n dx, or equivalently (S_r/r)^n times the normalized average energy over B_{S_r}(x0).
[§4, beginning] The notation δ_n(y) = lim_{r→∞} ∫_{B_r(y)} ||DF||^n dx is inconsistent with the later use of δ as a finite number; the limit should be the normalized average energy, and the subscript n in δ_n appears only once.
[§2, Proof of Lemma 2.2] There is a typo: 'Ferrond's result' should be 'Ferrand's result'.
[§3, Lemma 3.1] The phrase 'in case h(r) > 0' in the affine-rigidity part of the proof is confusing because h(r) as defined is always positive for nonconstant maps; this should be rephrased in terms of the normalized average energy.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the argument uses prior theorems as independent tools, and no step reduces the conclusion to its own inputs by definition.

full rationale

The paper's central theorem (Theorem 1.1) is proved by a blow-down argument: Lemma 3.1 supplies monotonicity of the energy, Lemma 4.1 shows that normalized blow-downs converge to affine isometries, Corollary 4.2 gives properness, and the final step uses Federer's monotonicity formula and a factorization theorem to conclude affinity. The load-bearing ingredients from the author's prior work, chiefly [IP24, Theorem 4.1], [IP24, Proposition 7.2], [IP24, Theorem 3.8], and [IP24, Corollary 4.5], are external theorems about conformal curves and integral currents, not restatements of the bounded-growth-implies-affine conclusion. They are parameter-free, have assumptions that do not include the target result, and are applied here as lemmas rather than assumed conclusions. This is self-citation, but it is not circular: the cited results could in principle be false without making Theorem 1.1 true by construction, and Theorem 1.1 does not reduce to them by a change of notation. The proof does contain a normalization inconsistency in Lemma 3.1: the displayed derivative formula corresponds to the normalized average energy, while (1.6) defines h(r) as the unnormalized integral, and the displayed Hölder step omits the spherical measure constant. This is a correctness or normalization gap in the written proof, not a circularity, because it does not make the theorem equivalent to its inputs. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors to forbid alternatives, and no known result is merely relabeled. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities. The central claim rests on standard results in geometric measure theory and on several theorems from the author's prior work with Pankka, which are invoked as established tools rather than proved here.

assumptions (8)

standard math Almgren's sharp isoperimetric inequality for integral currents
Used to establish monotonicity of average energy via pushforward currents.
domain assumption IP24, Theorem 4.1: isoperimetric estimate for conformal curves
Prior result by author and Pankka, central to Lemma 3.1; not proved here.
domain assumption IP24, Proposition 7.2: sequential compactness and weak continuity for conformal curve equations
Used in Lemma 4.1 to pass to the limit of blow-downs.
domain assumption IP24, Theorem 3.8: factorization of conformal curves through a conformal map and affine isometry
Used in Lemma 3.1 and Theorem 1.1.
domain assumption IP24, Corollary 4.5: continuation principle for conformal curves
Used to extend local factorization to the entire curve.
standard math Liouville's theorem for conformal maps in R^n and constant bounded holomorphic functions
Used to conclude the conformal factor in the factorization is affine.
standard math Federer's monotonicity formula and characterization of affine support of area-minimizing currents
Used in Theorem 1.1 to show the pushforward cycle has Euclidean mass and affine support.
standard math Zorich's theorem and Picard theorem for higher-dimensional conformal maps
Used in Lemma 2.2 to classify conformal maps from R^n to a simply connected manifold.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entire conformal curves are affine or have super-Euclidean energy growth." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IGDLHRR5

@misc{pith2026250904414,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entire conformal curves are affine or have super-Euclidean energy growth},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IGDLHRR5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04414}
}

abstract

We prove that entire conformal curves $\mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^m$ fall into two classes: either the curve is affine or the average energy in a ball is strictly increasing for large radii and diverges to infinity. This rigidity follows from a blow-down argument and the strong interaction of the generalized Cauchy--Riemann equations with calibrated geometries and the sharp isoperimetric inequality for integral currents due to Almgren. As an application, we prove that every entire Lipschitz conformal curve is affine. This can be considered a higher-dimensional analog of the statement that an entire holomorphic function with a bounded complex differential is affine. We also recall that a certain punctured cone over a Legendrian torus provides a submanifold in $\mathbb{R}^n$, for $n \geq 3$, for which an entire conformal curve yields a conformal covering map. As a related result, we prove that if a non-constant entire conformal curve factors through an $n$-dimensional submanifold, then the submanifold is calibrated and conformally equivalent to a flat non-compact quotient of $\mathbb{R}^n$.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

[1]

F. Almgren. Optimal isoperimetric inequalities. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 35(3):451--547, 1986

work page 1986
[2]

M. Berger. Quelques probl\`emes de g\'eom\'etrie riemannienne ou deux variations sur les espaces sym\'etriques compacts de rang un. Enseign. Math. (2) , 16:73--96, 1970

work page 1970
[3]

Degrees of maps and multiscale geometry

Aleksandr Berdnikov, Larry Guth, and Fedor Manin. Degrees of maps and multiscale geometry. Forum Math. Pi , 12:Paper No. e2, 48, 2024

work page 2024
[4]

Quasiregular mappings and cohomology

Mario Bonk and Juha Heinonen. Quasiregular mappings and cohomology. Acta Math. , 186(2):219--238, 2001

work page 2001
[5]

Zur theorie der minimalfl \"a chen

Torsten Carleman. Zur theorie der minimalfl \"a chen. Mathematische Zeitschrift , 9(1):154--160, Mar 1921

work page 1921
[6]

Bubble tree convergence of conformally cross product preserving maps

Da Rong Cheng, Spiro Karigiannis, and Jesse Madnick. Bubble tree convergence of conformally cross product preserving maps. Asian J. Math. , 24(6):903--984, 2020

work page 2020
[7]

Geometric measure theory

Herbert Federer. Geometric measure theory . Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 153. Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York, 1969

1969
[8]

a user Classics. Birkh\

Misha Gromov. Metric structures for R iemannian and non- R iemannian spaces . Modern Birkh\" a user Classics. Birkh\" a user Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, english edition, 2007. Based on the 1981 French original, With appendices by M. Katz, P. Pansu and S. Semmes, Translated from the French by Sean Michael Bates

work page 2007

Show all 26 references

[9]

R. E. Greene and H. Wu. Integrals of subharmonic functions on manifolds of nonnegative curvature. Invent. Math. , 27:265--298, 1974

1974
[10]

Quasiregular curves and cohomology

Susanna Heikkil\"a. Quasiregular curves and cohomology. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) , 128(5):Paper No. e12602, 27, 2024

2024
[11]

Blaine Lawson, Jr

Reese Harvey and H. Blaine Lawson, Jr. Calibrated geometries. Acta Math. , 148:47--157, 1982

1982
[12]

De R ham algebras of closed quasiregularly elliptic manifolds are E uclidean

Susanna Heikkil\"a and Pekka Pankka. De R ham algebras of closed quasiregularly elliptic manifolds are E uclidean. Ann. of Math. (2) , 201(2):459--488, 2025

2025
[13]

Quasiregular curves of small distortion in product manifolds

Susanna Heikkil\" a , Pekka Pankka, and Eden Prywes. Quasiregular curves of small distortion in product manifolds. J. Geom. Anal. , 33(1):Paper No. 1, 44, 2023

2023
[14]

A special class of k -harmonic maps inducing calibrated fibrations

Anton Iliashenko and Spiro Karigiannis . A special class of k -harmonic maps inducing calibrated fibrations . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2311.14074, November 2023

2023
[15]

Pushforward of currents under Sobolev maps

Toni Ikonen . Pushforward of currents under Sobolev maps . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2303.15003, March 2023

2023 arXiv
[16]

Liouville's theorem in calibrated geometries

Toni Ikonen and Pekka Pankka . Liouville's theorem in calibrated geometries . arXiv e-prints (J. Anal. Math., to appear) , page arXiv:2410.02722, October 2024

2024 arXiv
[17]

Dominic D. Joyce. Riemannian holonomy groups and calibrated geometry , volume 12 of Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007

2007
[18]

Blaine Lawson, Jr

H. Blaine Lawson, Jr. Lectures on minimal submanifolds. V ol. I , volume 9 of Mathematics Lecture Series . Publish or Perish, Inc., Wilmington, DE, second edition, 1980

1980
[19]

Geometrical interpretations of scalar curvature and regularity of conformal homeomorphisms

Jacqueline Lelong-Ferrand. Geometrical interpretations of scalar curvature and regularity of conformal homeomorphisms. In Differential geometry and relativity , volume Vol. 3 of dath. Phys. Appl. Math. , pages 91--105. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston, Mass., 1976

1976
[20]

Geometric measure theory

Frank Morgan. Geometric measure theory . Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, fourth edition, 2009. A beginner's guide

2009
[21]

On elliptic and quasiregularly elliptic manifolds , October 2024

Fedor Manin and Eden Prywes . On elliptic and quasiregularly elliptic manifolds , October 2024

2024
[22]

J -holomorphic curves and symplectic topology , volume 52 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications

Dusa McDuff and Dietmar Salamon. J -holomorphic curves and symplectic topology , volume 52 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004

2004
[23]

Quasiregular curves

Pekka Pankka. Quasiregular curves. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. , 45(2):975--990, 2020

2020
[24]

Ratcliffe

John G. Ratcliffe. Foundations of hyperbolic manifolds , volume 149 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer, Cham, third edition, [2019] 2019

2019
[25]

Quasiregular mappings , volume 26 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)]

Seppo Rickman. Quasiregular mappings , volume 26 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993

1993
[26]

Calculus of variations

Filip Rindler. Calculus of variations . Universitext. Springer, Cham, 2018

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

F. Almgren. Optimal isoperimetric inequalities. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 35(3):451--547, 1986

work page 1986

[2] [2]

M. Berger. Quelques probl\`emes de g\'eom\'etrie riemannienne ou deux variations sur les espaces sym\'etriques compacts de rang un. Enseign. Math. (2) , 16:73--96, 1970

work page 1970

[3] [3]

Degrees of maps and multiscale geometry

Aleksandr Berdnikov, Larry Guth, and Fedor Manin. Degrees of maps and multiscale geometry. Forum Math. Pi , 12:Paper No. e2, 48, 2024

work page 2024

[4] [4]

Quasiregular mappings and cohomology

Mario Bonk and Juha Heinonen. Quasiregular mappings and cohomology. Acta Math. , 186(2):219--238, 2001

work page 2001

[5] [5]

Zur theorie der minimalfl \"a chen

Torsten Carleman. Zur theorie der minimalfl \"a chen. Mathematische Zeitschrift , 9(1):154--160, Mar 1921

work page 1921

[6] [6]

Bubble tree convergence of conformally cross product preserving maps

Da Rong Cheng, Spiro Karigiannis, and Jesse Madnick. Bubble tree convergence of conformally cross product preserving maps. Asian J. Math. , 24(6):903--984, 2020

work page 2020

[7] [7]

Geometric measure theory

Herbert Federer. Geometric measure theory . Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 153. Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York, 1969

1969

[8] [8]

a user Classics. Birkh\

Misha Gromov. Metric structures for R iemannian and non- R iemannian spaces . Modern Birkh\" a user Classics. Birkh\" a user Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, english edition, 2007. Based on the 1981 French original, With appendices by M. Katz, P. Pansu and S. Semmes, Translated from the French by Sean Michael Bates

work page 2007