Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 38 references

A Cryogenic Dielectric Antenna for Wireless Sensing and Interfacing Outside the 10 K Environment

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a head-to-head cryogenic test, the ceramic ZST holds its frequency, improves its quality factor, and senses a room-temperature target through a cryostat window at only 1 mW of power.

desk verdict Useful side-by-side cryogenic DRA data, but the ZST Q-enhancement claim needs a cable-calibration check before it can carry the 'foundational material' conclusion. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.06199 v1 pith:H2XV3MAE submitted 2025-09-07 physics.optics

Ingrid Torres , Alex Krasnok This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords cryogenicmicrowavematerialsdielectricresonatorantenna(DRA)(ZrSn)TiO₄(ZST)MgTiO₃–CaO₃(MCT)qualityfactorthermalhysteresiswirelesslinkTE₀₁δmode
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum processors must sit at millikelvin temperatures, but every cable that carries microwave signals into the cryostat also carries heat—a bottleneck the paper attacks by asking whether a dielectric resonator antenna can send signals through a window instead. The paper compares two ceramic candidates side by side from 296 K down to 7–10 K: MgTiO₃–CaTiO₃ (MCT), engineered to be frequency-stable at room temperature, and (Zr,Sn)TiO₄ (ZST). MCT fails in the cold: its resonance drifts roughly 230 MHz, its loaded quality factor collapses from about 34 to 7, and it shows roughly 150 MHz of thermal hysteresis, behavior the authors trace to incipient-ferroelectric and relaxor-like losses in its CaTiO₃ component. ZST, by contrast, drifts only about 30 MHz, improves its loaded quality factor by about 22%, and shows no discernible hysteresis. The authors then run the ZST disk as a 1 mW antenna at 10 K and demonstrate a through-window wireless link that detects a room-temperature water sphere out to about four wavelengths—evidence that cable-free sensing and, eventually, wireless interconnects from the cold stage are physically plausible.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on two coupled objects. First is the TE₀₁δ dielectric-resonator mode of high-permittivity ceramic disks, whose azimuthal electric field keeps energy confined inside the dielectric—the same property that gives a high unloaded Q and, through the magnetic field enhancement (about 26 to 33 times the feed field at resonance), the strong coupling a qubit would need. Second is the material relation τf = −(½ τ_εr + α_L), which ties resonant-frequency stability to the temperature coefficient of permittivity and thermal expansion; the paper's entire contrast is that MCT relies on room-temperature cancellation between components (MgTiO₃ and CaTiO₃, an incipient ferroelectric whose Bar

What would settle it

Repeat cooldown–warmup on a second MCT sample with a soak of 30 minutes at every setpoint and a full two-port calibration at each temperature; if the 150 K cooldown/warmup frequency gap shrinks below roughly 50 MHz, or if the ZST Q gain at 10 K disappears after reference-plane correction, the reported hysteresis and Q enhancement are measurement artifacts rather than material behavior.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is comparative: operated as dielectric resonator antennas under identical fixtures and protocols from 296 K to 7–10 K, MCT and ZST diverge completely. The MCT resonator drifts roughly 230 MHz by 10 K, its loaded Q collapses from about 34 to 7 below 150 K, and it shows roughly 150 MHz of thermal hysteresis at the 150 K setpoint—behavior the authors attribute to incipient-ferroelectric and relaxor-like losses in its CaTiO₃ component. The ZST resonator drifts only about 30 MHz over the same range (average τf ≈ −40 ppm/K), improves its loaded Q by 22.6% (estimated unloaded Q rising from about 48 to 64), and shows negligible hysteresis. The authors then ope

Load-bearing premise

The headline numbers come from one-port S11 curves of a single sample of each material, with no error bars or stated soak times, no correction for cable or reference-plane losses, and temperature-independent simulation models used for design—so the reported hysteresis and Q values assume the S11 trace itself, not cable drift, thermal lag, or fixture effects, is what changed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ZST becomes a candidate baseline dielectric for deep-cryogenic resonators: a 30 MHz total frequency drift (average τf ≈ −40 ppm/K), a 22.6% increase in loaded Q at 10 K, and no measurable thermal hysteresis.
  • The measured Q improvement implies roughly an 18% narrower resonance linewidth at 10 K, which supports denser frequency-division multiplexing with fewer frequency collisions.
  • A through-window wireless link works at 1 mW input power, detecting a dielectric target from λ/2 to 4λ via near-field frequency shifts (up to −2.5 MHz) and far-field amplitude modulation—evidence that cable-free readout from a 10 K stage is physically feasible.
  • The low-temperature Q of ZST is attributed to temperature-independent extrinsic losses (oxygen vacancies, impurities, grain boundaries), so cryogenic Q measurements become a practical screening tool for material purity and processing quality.
  • Room-temperature τf ≈ 0 engineering does not survive deep cooling: the MCT result implies that materials relying on cancellation between components with opposed permittivity-temperature signs need re-evaluation or suppression of the incipient-ferroelectric phase before use below about 150 K.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper stops at sensing; a plausible next step it does not claim is using the same ZST disk both as a qubit-coupling element (its H-field enhancement reaches about 26 times the feed field) and as the radiator for a wireless control or readout link in a quantum chip package.
  • Because each material was represented by a single sample with no error bars and no stated soak times, the general claim that ZST outperforms MCT at 10 K would be strengthened by a multi-sample repeat with calibrated reference planes—a test the reader could carry out rather than a conclusion the paper already proves.
  • The dual near/far-field readout scheme should generalize to any dielectric target, which suggests a fast screening test for candidate cryogenic dielectrics: watch for a loaded-Q collapse below about 150 K as an early-warning signature of relaxor-type loss.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. Torres and Krasnok report a side-by-side cryogenic comparison of MCT and ZST dielectric resonator antennas from 296 K down to 7–10 K. They find that MCT drifts by ~230 MHz, shows ~150 MHz hysteresis at 150 K, and its loaded Q collapses to ~7 at 7 K, whereas ZST shifts by only ~30 MHz, its loaded Q improves by 22.6% (27.6 to 33.9), and no hysteresis is observed. The ZST device is then used as a 10 K through-window antenna at 1 mW input power to detect a water-sphere target at distances up to 4λ, attributed to near-field frequency shifts and far-field S11 magnitude changes. The paper concludes that ZST is a promising cryogenic dielectric for quantum interfaces and wireless links.

Significance. If correct, the work provides a useful material benchmark and a proof-of-concept for low-power cryogenic wireless links. Its strengths are the side-by-side identical-fixture comparison, direct f0(T) and S11(T) measurements, CST design predictions, and the use of window-open/closed baselines to isolate target responses. The τf values are derived from measured frequencies without free parameters. However, the quantitative claims—especially the Q-factor enhancement and inferred intrinsic-loss reduction—rest on one-port S11 measurements without cryogenic calibration or de-embedding, and the near/far-field classification is not self-consistent. The results therefore constitute a promising but not yet fully established comparative study.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2C, Fig. 3b] The central claim that ZST's loaded Q improves by 22.6% and that its unloaded Q rises from ~48 to ~64 is not established. The one-port S11 data are measured with the VNA reference plane outside the cryostat, and no cryogenic calibration or de-embedding is reported. The statement that 'identical VNA settings and reference plane were used across all temperatures' does not correct for temperature-dependent cable loss, which decreases upon cooling and would deepen and narrow the observed resonance dips exactly in the pattern reported (−16.5 dB to −25.3 dB; linewidth 93.5 MHz to 77.0 MHz). The limitations paragraph at the end of Section 3 acknowledges only simulation limitations, not this calibration gap. Please provide a cold calibration (e.g., reflection calibration at the resonator plane or measured cable S21 versus temperature) or otherwise quantify the cable contribution, and report the
  2. [Section 2B, Fig. 3a] The MCT hysteresis value (Δf0^hyst ≈ 150 MHz at 150 K) and the Q_L collapse to ~7 at 7 K may reflect thermal lag or noise-floor artifacts rather than intrinsic material behavior. No soak times, independent sample-temperature readings, or repeated thermal cycles are reported, and each material is represented by a single sample. Without error bars or a thermalization protocol, the path dependence and the low-temperature Q value are not quantitatively supported. Please add soak-time details, repeated-cycle data, and uncertainty estimates for f0 and Q_L.
  3. [Section 2D, Fig. 4] The near-field/far-field classification is internally inconsistent. The text defines the far-field onset as rFF ≳ 2D²/λ and states that d < rFF is near-field, but the disk diameter D is not reported anywhere. The subsequent classification uses d ≤ λ as near-field and d > λ as far-field without showing that λ is comparable to rFF. If rFF exceeds 4λ, the 'far-field' magnitude modulations at 4λ would actually be reactive near-field effects, undermining the dual-modality sensing claim. Please report D, compute rFF, and relabel the sensing regimes consistently with the stated criterion.
  4. [Section 2B, Section 2C] None of the quantitative metrics—f0 shifts, Q_L values, τf, or hysteresis—are reported with error bars or repeat measurements. With a single sample per material and no indication of measurement variability, the comparison between MCT and ZST is not statistically grounded. At minimum, provide repeated measurements, fitting residuals, or a conservative uncertainty estimate for each extracted quantity, especially the shallow MCT resonance at 7 K where Q_L=7 is extracted from a dip nearly indistinguishable from the noise floor.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2A, Eq. (1)] The τf definition in the text uses f_i, f_f, and f_avg without defining them; please add explicit definitions and units.
  2. [Figure 3] The cooldown and warmup traces in Fig. 3a are difficult to distinguish in grayscale; add markers or a clearer legend. Also label the temperature of each trace or provide a colorbar.
  3. [Figure 4 inset] The inset reports approximate dip depths without uncertainties or repeated measurements; add error bars or state the measurement repeatability.
  4. [References] Balanis (ref. 36) is listed but not cited in the text around the near/far-field definition; please add the citation where the criterion is introduced.
  5. [General] There are several typographical issues, including missing spaces ('antenna s', 'en ding') and inconsistent equation formatting. A careful proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central results are direct cryogenic measurements with standard extraction formulas, and the simulations are compared against, not fitted to, the measurements.

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on direct measurements: resonant frequencies, S11 spectra, and their changes with temperature. The tau_f values are computed from measured f0(T) via the stated definition, not fitted to predetermine an answer. The loaded Q is extracted from S11 linewidth, and the unloaded Q is inferred from the standard one-port relation |S11(f0)| = |(1-beta)/(1+beta)|; this is a textbook reduction, not a circular one. The CST simulations use room-temperature literature epsilon_r and tan_delta with no temperature dependence, and the simulated near-critical coupling is explicitly described as 'a prediction to be tested by cryogenic measurement,' so the later agreement is a genuine comparison rather than a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The wireless-link analysis references all sensing metrics to the antenna-window-open baseline, which is a control, and the negative near-field frequency shift follows from the stated perturbation-theory formula rather than being assumed. The only self-citations (refs. 18, 19) are contextual examples of dielectric antennas and are not load-bearing for the cryogenic stability, Q-enhancement, or wireless-detection claims. No uniqueness theorem, imported ansatz, or renaming of a known result is used. The skeptic's concern about temperature-dependent cable loss affecting the S11 calibration is a serious measurement-validity question, but it is not an instance of definitional or self-citational circularity under the specified criteria, because the paper does not define its conclusion into its inputs; it reports raw S11 data without de-embedding. Thus the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results are experimental measurements, not derivations. No free parameters are fitted. The paper relies on standard perturbative and resonator theory, on literature values for material properties and water permittivity, and on the assumption that the two ceramic samples are representative of their material classes. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math One-port resonator relation |S11(f0)| = |(1-beta)/(1+beta)| and the associated Q extraction.
    Used in Sections 2B and 2C to extract coupling beta and unloaded Q_u from measured S11 minima; assumes a linear, reciprocal one-port resonator with no cable loss or parasitic reflections.
  • standard math Cavity perturbation theory (Slater's theorem), Eq. (3), for the negative frequency shift.
    Used in Section 2D to interpret the measured -2.5 MHz shift as capacitive loading; assumes a small perturbation and known unperturbed fields.
  • domain assumption The two ceramic samples (MCT and ZST) are representative of the respective material classes.
    The paper draws general conclusions about MCT and ZST as materials from one disk of each, supplied by T-Ceram, with no sample-to-sample variability data.
  • domain assumption Room-temperature literature values for permittivity and loss tangent are appropriate inputs for the CST simulations.
    Simulations in Section 2A use frequency-independent epsilon_r and tan delta from room-temperature literature; the paper acknowledges this limitation in the Conclusions.
  • domain assumption The observed low-temperature MCT degradation is attributed to relaxor-like domain-wall motion.
    Section 2B states the data are consistent with this picture but explicitly refrains from a definitive assignment without direct domain-dynamics measurements, so the physical explanation is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Cryogenic Dielectric Antenna for Wireless Sensing and Interfacing Outside the 10 K Environment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H2XV3MAE

@misc{pith2026250906199,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Cryogenic Dielectric Antenna for Wireless Sensing and Interfacing Outside the 10 K Environment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H2XV3MAE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06199}
}
read the original abstract

The performance and scalability of cryogenic microwave systems, particularly for quantum processors, are fundamentally limited by the thermal stability and loss of their constituent dielectric materials. While mixed titanate ceramics like MgTiO3-CaTiO3 (MCT) and (Zr,Sn)TiO4 (ZST) are primary candidates, their comparative performance as radiative antennas in the deep-cryogenic regime has remained uncharacterized. Here we present a side-by-side comparison of MCT and ZST operated as dielectric resonator antennas from 296 K down to 7-10 K under identical fixtures and protocols. While the MCT resonator exhibits large, nonlinear frequency drift (230 MHz by 10 K), pronounced thermal hysteresis, and a collapse of the loaded quality factor at low temperature-behavior consistent with incipient/relaxor-like losses, the ZST resonator demonstrates exceptional stability. Its resonant frequency shifts by only 30 MHz, its loaded Q-factor is enhanced by 20-25%, and it shows negligible thermal hysteresis. Leveraging these properties, we operate the ZST disk as a radiative antenna at 10 K with only 1 mW input, establishing a through-window wireless link that detects room-temperature dielectric targets over multiple wavelengths via near-field frequency shifts and far-field magnitude modulations. This presents a viable path toward non-invasive cryogenic diagnostics and wireless interconnects that circumvent the thermal load of physical cabling. Our findings establish ZST as a foundational material for high-coherence quantum interfaces and provide a practical template for designing wireless cryogenic systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S. M. Anlage, Microwave Superconductivity. IEEE J. Microw. 1, 389–402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Arakawa, Y

    T. Arakawa, Y . Kato, S. Kon, Determination of microwave material properties at cryogenic temperatures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 126 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Cryogenic Characterization of Microwave Devices

    A. Alimenti, N. Pompeo, E. Silva, K. Torokhtii, P . V. García, “Cryogenic Characterization of Microwave Devices” in 2023 IEEE International Workshop on Technologies for Defense and Security (TechDefense) (IEEE, Rome, Italy, 2023; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10380836/), pp. 262–267

    work page arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Weinstock, M

    H. Weinstock, M. Nisenoff, Eds., Microwave Superconductivity (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2001; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-010-0450-3)

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0450-3 2001

  5. [5]

    R. R. Mansour, Microwave superconductivity. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 50, 750– 759 (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Gawande, R

    R. Gawande, R. Bradley, G. Langston, Low noise, 0.4–3 GHz cryogenic receiver for radio astronomy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Cryogenic systems in Radio Astronomy

    J. M. Serna, “Cryogenic systems in Radio Astronomy” in Proceedings of 2nd MCCT- SKADS Training School. Radio Astronomy: Fundamentals and the New Instruments — PoS(2nd MCCT-SKADS) (Sissa Medialab, Sigüenza (Spain), 2009; https://pos.sissa.it/065/012), p. 012

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Balega, O

    Y. Balega, O. Bolshakov, A. Chernikov, A. Gunbina, V. Edelman, M. Efimova, A. Eliseev, A. Krasilnikov, I. Lapkin, I. Lesnov, M. Mansfeld, M. Markina, E. Pevzner, S. Shitov, A. Smirnov, M. Tarasov, N. Tyatushkin, A. Vdovin, V. Vdovin, Development of Cryogenic Systems for Astronomical Research. Photonics 11, 257 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Ivanov, S

    H. Ivanov, S. Mejri, A. Di Mira, K. Schulz, C. Heese, Review of Deep Space Optical Communications. Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw. 43, 193–209 (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    M. Jing, S. Xue, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, S. Jia, Practical ultra-low frequency noise laser system for quantum sensors. EPJ Quantum Technol. 11 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    J. C. Bardin, D. Sank, O. Naaman, E. Jeffrey, Quantum Computing: An Introduction for Microwave Engineers. IEEE Microw. Mag. 21, 24–44 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    J. C. Bardin, D. H. Slichter, D. J. Reilly, Microwaves in Quantum Computing. IEEE J. Microw. 1, 403–427 (2021). 13

    2021

  5. [13]

    J. C. Brennan, J. Barbosa, C. Li, M. Ahmad, F. Imroze, C. Rose, W. Karar, M. Stanley, H. Heidari, N. M. Ridler, M. Weides, Classical Interfaces for Controlling Cryogenic Quantum Computing Technologies. arXiv arXiv:2504.18527 [Preprint] (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.18527

    2025 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    J. M. Hornibrook, J. I. Colless, I. D. Conway Lamb, S. J. Pauka, H. Lu, A. C. Gossard, J. D. Watson, G. C. Gardner, S. Fallahi, M. J. Manfra, D. J. Reilly, Cryogenic Control Architecture for Large-Scale Quantum Computing. Phys. Rev. Appl. 3 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Wireless Microwave Signal Transmission for Cryogenic Applications

    J. U. Rehman Kazim, M. Z. Ali, A. Al-Moathin, F. Nikbakhtnasrabadi, P. Khatri, M. Powell, M. Stanley, N. M. Ridler, A. Rossi, M. Weides, H. Heidari, M. A. Imran, Q. H. Abbasi, C. Li, “Wireless Microwave Signal Transmission for Cryogenic Applications” in 2023 IEEE International...

    2023

  8. [16]

    S. Long, M. McAllister, Liang Shen, The resonant cylindrical dielectric cavity antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 31, 406–412 (1983)

    1983

  9. [17]

    J. K. Plourde, Chung-Li Ren, Application of Dielectric Resonators in Microwave Components. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 29, 754–770 (1981)

    1981

  10. [18]

    A. E. Krasnok, D. S. Filonov, C. R. Simovski, Y . S. Kivshar, P . A. Belov, Experimental demonstration of superdirective dielectric antenna. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    D. S. Filonov, A. E. Krasnok, A. P. Slobozhanyuk, P . V. Kapitanova, E. A. Nenasheva, Y. S. Kivshar, P . A. Belov, Experimental verification of the concept of all-dielectric nanoantennas. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 201113 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    Zhang, S

    Y. Zhang, S. Ogurtsov, V. Vasilev, A. A. Kishk, D. Caratelli, Advanced Dielectric Resonator Antenna Technology for 5G and 6G Applications. Sensors 24, 1413 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    J. B. Huang, B. Yang, C. Y. Yu, G. F. Zhang, H. Xue, Z. X. Xiong, G. Viola, R. Donnan, H. X. Yan, M. J. Reece, Microwave and terahertz dielectric properties of MgTiO3–CaTiO3 ceramics. Mater. Lett. 138, 225–227 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    V. V. Lemanov, A. V. Sotnikov, E. P . Smirnova, M. Weihnacht, R. Kunze, Perovskite CaTiO3 as an incipient ferroelectric. Solid State Commun. 110, 611–614 (1999)

    1999

  15. [23]

    Viticoli, G

    M. Viticoli, G. Padeletti, S. Kaciulis, G. M. Ingo, L. Pandolfi, C. Zaldo, Structural and dielectric properties of ZrTiO4 and Zr0.8Sn0.2TiO4 deposited by pulsed laser deposition. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 118, 87–91 (2005)

    2005

  16. [24]

    Hirano, T

    S. Hirano, T. Hayashi, A. Hattori, Chemical Processing and Microwave Characteristics of (Zr,Sn)TiO4 Microwave Dielectrics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 1320–1324 (1991)

    1991

  17. [25]

    D. Pamu, G. L. Narayana Rao, K. C. James Raju, M. V. Jaco, Effect of CuO on the sintering and cryogenic microwave characteristics of (Zr0.8Sn0.2)TiO4 ceramics. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 8, 469–476 (2007). 14

    2007

  18. [26]

    R. K. Mongia, P. Bhartia, Dielectric resonator antennas—a review and general design relations for resonant frequency and bandwidth. Int. J. Microw. Millim.-Wave Comput.- Aided Eng. 4, 230–247 (1994)

    1994

  19. [27]

    Blais, S

    A. Blais, S. M. Girvin, W. D. Oliver, Quantum information processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nat. Phys. 16, 247–256 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 4th Edition (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011)

    2011

  22. [30]

    J. H. Barrett, Dielectric Constant in Perovskite Type Crystals. Phys. Rev. 86, 118–120 (1952)

    1952

  23. [31]

    A. A. Bokov, Z.-G. Ye, Recent progress in relaxor ferroelectrics with perovskite structure. J. Mater. Sci. 41, 31–52 (2006)

    2006

  24. [32]

    Y. Y . Gao, M. A. Rol, S. Touzard, C. Wang, Practical Guide for Building Superconducting Quantum Devices. PRX Quantum 2, 040202 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Principles of Sensors

    L. He, B. Feng, “Principles of Sensors” in Fundamentals of Measurement and Signal Analysis (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2022; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-19-6549-4_7), pp. 189–270

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    R. A. Waldron, Perturbation theory of resonant cavities. Proc. IEE Part C Monogr. 107, 272 (1960)

    1960

  27. [35]

    Gyenis, A

    A. Gyenis, A. Di Paolo, J. Koch, A. Blais, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, Moving beyond the Transmon: Noise-Protected Superconducting Quantum Circuits. PRX Quantum 2, 1 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Balanis, Antenna Theory (Wiley, 2005)

    C. Balanis, Antenna Theory (Wiley, 2005)

    2005

  29. [37]

    H. J. Liebe, G. A. Hufford, T. Manabe, A model for the complex permittivity of water at frequencies below 1 THz. Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves 12, 659–675 (1991)

    1991

  30. [38]

    R. E. Jacobsen, S. Arslanagić, A. V. Lavrinenko, Water-based devices for advanced control of electromagnetic waves. Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 041304 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.