Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Nonlinear chiral light generation from resonant metasurfaces

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single mirror-symmetric metasurface flips light handedness in 3.2 fs

desk verdict The tunable chiral THG from an achiral metasurface looks real; the 'generic mechanism' is a fit dressed as a theory, so treat the model as illustrative, not proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.06683 v1 pith:23W4R5CC submitted 2025-09-08 physics.optics

Fangxing Lai , Jun Yin , Ivan Toftul , Hamdi Barkaoui , Huachun Deng , Xinbo Sha , Maxim V. Gorkunov , Yuri Kivshar
show 1 more author
Qinghai Song
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.65.Ky42.25.Ja
keywords nonlinearchiralitythird-harmonicgenerationdielectricmetasurfacecircularpolarizationcoupled-modetheoryall-opticalswitchingfemtosecondpulses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that one mirror-symmetric silicon metasurface, with no chiral structure and no external quarter-wave plate, can turn a linearly polarized infrared pump directly into circularly polarized third-harmonic light. The handedness of that emitted light is not fixed by the sample: rotating the input polarization continuously changes the degree of nonlinear chirality, demonstrated experimentally over DNC = -0.86 to +0.94 on a single sample. By overlapping two delayed pump pulses with different polarizations, the instantaneous pump polarization changes within the pulse, and the emitted chirality reverses in a 3.2 fs delay step, orders of magnitude faster than earlier polarization modulators. The reason a reader should care is that chiral nonlinear sources currently need bulky optics and offer static or slow control; this is a compact, all-optical route to reconfigurable circularly polarized light.

What carries the argument

The central object is a modified temporal coupled-mode theory expansion of the third-harmonic field. The paper writes the TH field as the sum of three resonant eigenmode contributions plus an uncoupled background, and couples each mode amplitude to the third-order nonlinear current and to four outgoing radiation channels. What carries the argument is that the radiation coefficients and uncoupled channel amplitudes are complex numbers whose phases vary with the pump polarization; the emitted polarization is determined by their vector sum. Because the metasurface's mirror symmetry makes the linear circular dichroism vanish, the observed chirality cannot come from linear structural chirality an

What would settle it

A decisive check: measure the emitted third-harmonic Stokes vector as the pump polarization angle is swept in steps small enough to resolve the predicted winding on the polarization-state sphere. The model predicts the path passes through both circular poles and that the DNC flip from -0.86 to +0.94 is accompanied by a specific phase jump of the dominant field components; a phase-sensitive measurement, for example via spectral interferometry against a reference TH pulse, would reveal whether that jump actually occurs or whether the uncoupled background must be re-fitted at every angle.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the third-harmonic wavelength near 732 nm, the metasurface supports three high-quality orthogonal resonances. The paper shows that the TH field is the vector sum of three resonant-mode contributions plus a nonresonant background. As the linear polarization angle of the 2.2 µm pump rotates, the complex amplitudes of these contributions change; at one angle the sum has equal orthogonal real and imaginary parts rotating clockwise (left-circular), while at another angle the same amplitudes, with certain phases flipped, rotate counter-clockwise (right-circular). Experimentally, with a 2220 nm pump, the authors record DNC = -0.86 at one input angle and DNC = 0.94 at another, and, using two dela

Load-bearing premise

The explanation leans on the assumption that the measured third-harmonic signal is fully captured by exactly three resonant modes plus a background component whose values are fitted from the same simulation being interpreted; if that fitted background actually absorbs whatever the modes fail to explain, the proposed mechanism is underdetermined even though the observed chirality control itself may remain real.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single mirror-symmetric metasurface can replace the combination of a nonlinear crystal and a quarter-wave plate for producing user-defined circularly polarized harmonics.
  • Rotating the pump polarization yields continuous, post-fabrication control of the emitted chirality across nearly the full range from DNC = -1 to +1.
  • The all-optical delay-line scheme switches nonlinear chirality on a few-femtosecond timescale, orders of magnitude faster than existing polarization modulators.
  • The mechanism is claimed to be generic and extendable to other resonance spectral ranges, including telecommunications wavelengths.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The phase-interference picture suggests the same control should appear in second-harmonic or difference-frequency generation whenever two or more non-degenerate resonances sit near the generated wavelength; the paper only demonstrates third-harmonic generation, so this is an extension, not a claim.
  • The few-femtosecond switching step is the delay step at which averaged DNC crosses zero, not necessarily the rise time of a single-pulse output; a testable extension is to measure the emitted TH pulse directly and check whether the helicity within one pulse changes on the same few-femtosecond timescale.
  • Because DNC is exquisitely sensitive to the complex nonlinear susceptibility of anything placed on the metasurface, the same device could act as a compact chirality sensor; the paper does not demonstrate sensing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports that a mirror-symmetric Si metasurface, pumped by a linearly polarized infrared beam, emits third-harmonic light whose circular polarization state can be continuously tuned by rotating the pump polarization. The authors introduce a degree of nonlinear chirality (DNC) and demonstrate, in experiments and simulations, a tunable range from DNC = -0.86 to 0.94, as well as all-optical switching of DNC within a 3.2 fs delay step using a pump-probe scheme. A temporal coupled-mode theory (Eqs. 1-2) is proposed to explain the mechanism, decomposing the TH field into three resonant eigenmodes plus an uncoupled background field.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a compact and potentially transformative approach to generating and controlling chiral light in nonlinear nanophotonics, avoiding external waveplates and chiral structures. The main strengths are the direct experimental measurement of DNC, the THG power slope of 2.982, the essentially vanishing linear CD, and the close agreement between simulated and measured quasi-periods (7.36 fs vs ~7.3 fs) in the all-optical switching experiment. The experimental DNC control is robust and does not depend on the theoretical model. However, the proposed 'generic mechanism' is currently underdetermined because the uncoupled field is extracted from the same simulation it is used to explain.

major comments (2)
  1. [Working principle, Eqs. (1)-(2), Fig. 1D caption] The central mechanistic claim is load-bearing: the paper states that the TH field is a coherent sum of three resonant eigenmodes plus an uncoupled background E0^(3ω), and that phase jumps at θ≈83.5° and 96.5° reverse the handedness. However, the complex amplitudes of E0^(3ω) are extracted from the same full-wave simulation used to produce the DNC(θ) curve, and Fig. 1D explicitly labels the theoretical curve as 'fitting results.' This means Eqs. (1)-(2) re-express the simulation rather than independently predict it. To substantiate the 'generic mechanism,' the authors should validate E0 in an independent way—e.g., by computing the uncoupled TH radiation from a nonresonant reference geometry and comparing its amplitude and phase to the fitted values—or by fitting to a subset of angles and predicting the rest. They should also report the relative magnitude of the uncoupled contribution and
  2. [All-optical control, Fig. 4D] The headline claim of switching DNC from 0.47 to -0.46 within a 3.2 fs delay step rests on a single pair of delay points. The text states that three repeated measurements show similar trends, but no error bars or multiple adjacent delay points are shown for this specific transition. Given that the DNC values are extracted from spectrally integrated THG and the pump-probe overlap introduces a continuum of polarization states, the authors should present the full delay scan around the transition with statistical uncertainties, and ideally a finer delay step, to convincingly support the '3.2 fs switching' statement.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1D] Typo: 'polarization angel' should be 'polarization angle.' Also, the caption says 'fitting results with the theoretical model' while the text says 'numerical simulation results'; this should be clarified.
  2. [Abstract and summary] The abstract claims 'arbitrary degree of nonlinear chirality,' but the experimental demonstration covers the range from -0.86 to 0.94, not the full [-1,1] interval. Please qualify the claim or specify that the full range is shown numerically.
  3. [Methods] The third-order nonlinear susceptibility χ(3) of silicon is not specified. If the simulation DNC values are to be reproducible, the magnitude and tensor form of χ(3) used in both frequency-domain and FDTD simulations should be given.
  4. [Summary (end of main text)] The phrase 'The whole system is a chiral system' is confusing because the metasurface and pump are described as achiral. Consider rephrasing to 'the emitted field is chiral' or 'the nonlinear process yields chiral emission.'

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Mechanistic explanation of arbitrary DNC is a fit to the simulation it claims to explain; the direct experimental DNC control and fs switching are independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Working principle section, Eqs. (1)-(2); Fig. 1D caption]
    ""E0(3ω) is what we call the uncoupled field, i.e., the TH field generated without coupling to three explicitly accounted eigenmodes" ... "Following Eqs. 1, 2 and eigenmode expansion method (27), the TH radiation in the simulation can be decomposed to several resonant modes and four uncoupled fields" ... Fig. 1D caption: "The dots represent the fitting results with the theoretical model.""

    Eq. (1) writes the TH field as three eigenmodes plus E0^(3ω), and Eq. (2) couples them via CMT. The complex amplitudes of the modes and of E0^(3ω) are not predicted independently; they are obtained by decomposing/fitting the same full-wave simulation that produces the DNC(θ) curve, as the Fig. 1D caption states. Hence the 'mechanism' — phase jumps in the decomposed components reversing handedness at θ = 83.5°/96.5° — is a restatement of the simulation, not a testable prediction. Because E0^(3ω) is a residual that absorbs whatever the three modes do not explain, the decomposition cannot validate the claim that the three resonances generically control chirality. This does not affect the direct experimental measurements of DNC control and 3.2 fs switching, which are independent of the model.

full rationale

The only significant circular element is the mechanistic model in Eqs. (1)-(2) and Fig. 1D. The paper is transparent about 'fitting results,' so the issue is not hidden, but the theoretical DNC curve is a fit to the numerical data it is used to explain. The experimental central claims — continuous DNC tuning from -0.86 to 0.94 by polarization rotation, and switching in 3.2 fs — are direct measurements and do not rely on the coupled-mode decomposition. There is some self-citation (ref. 27 for eigenmode expansion, ref. 3 perspective), but none of it is a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz; the cited eigenmode method is a general tool. Thus the circularity is partial, confined to the 'generic mechanism' explanation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The experimental core rests mainly on standard linear optics, the Si chi^(3) assumption, and the specific fabricated geometry. The theoretical explanation adds an adjustable 'uncoupled field' whose complex amplitudes are fitted to the simulation, which is the main calibration point in the paper.

free parameters (4)
  • Uncoupled TH field E0^(3ω) (channel amplitudes s_k^(0)) = complex amplitudes/phases extracted from the same full-wave simulation
    This term makes the three-mode coupled-mode decomposition complete. Its amplitude and phase are not predicted independently but read from the simulation, so it can absorb residual THG and helps the model track the simulated/experimental DNC (Fig. 1D fitting dots).
  • Metasurface geometry (a=434 nm, w1=379 nm, w2=89 nm, l=160 nm, h=234 nm) = chosen by design
    Geometry is chosen so three resonances sit near the TH wavelength (734.6/731.7/731.2 nm); it is an input, not fitted to DNC, but the claimed phenomenon depends on this specific design.
  • Mode parameters at TH (lambda_n, Q_n) = lambda1=734.6 nm/Q1=219, lambda2=731.7/Q2=296, lambda3=731.2/Q3=578
    Taken from linear finite-element eigenmode simulations; used as inputs to the coupled-mode equations.
  • Pump-probe beam parameters (2Psi=2.44, 2Chi=0.64, |A1|^2=1.2|A2|^2) = chosen experimentally
    These set the instantaneous polarization trajectory and the all-optical DNC curve; they are experimental inputs, not predicted by the theory.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Temporal coupled-mode theory with no incoming channels at 3omega and four outgoing channels
    Eq. 2 follows Fan et al. (ref. 25); it assumes weak leakage and linear mode-channel coupling.
  • domain assumption Third-order nonlinear polarization j(3omega)= -3i*omega*epsilon0*chi^(3)*(E(omega))^2*E(omega) with isotropic instantaneous chi^(3)
    Used to drive THG; ignores tensor anisotropy, nonlocality, and higher-order terms in Si.
  • domain assumption Fundamental field at 2196 nm is nonresonant, so the nonlinear source can be obtained from the linear field
    Text states no resonances exist beyond 1 micrometer; this justifies treating E(omega) as known and j(3omega) as a prescribed source.
  • ad hoc to paper Three explicit eigenmodes plus the uncoupled field are sufficient to represent the TH radiation
    No convergence or uniqueness proof is given; this is the load-bearing modeling choice that creates room for the fitted uncoupled background.
  • domain assumption The PMMA/K9 out-of-plane asymmetry negligibly affects DNC
    Invoked in the experimental comparison to keep the sample effectively achiral in the model.
invented entities (2)
  • Degree of nonlinear chirality (DNC) independent evidence
    purpose: Quantifies handedness of TH radiation as (I_RCP - I_LCP)/(I_RCP + I_LCP); enables continuous tuning claims.
    A new metric, not a physical force or particle, but operationally defined and directly measurable in the experiment.
  • Uncoupled field E0^(3omega)
    purpose: Accounts for THG not mediated by the three explicit eigenmodes, making the decomposition complete.
    Its amplitude and phase are extracted from the full simulation rather than predicted independently, so it is a catch-all background term with no external falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear chiral light generation from resonant metasurfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/23W4R5CC

@misc{pith2026250906683,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear chiral light generation from resonant metasurfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/23W4R5CC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06683}
}
read the original abstract

Chiral nonlinear response has been explored for decades due to its extreme sensitivity to molecular and structural dissymmetry. Conventional approaches often require bulky systems and produce only static nonlinear chirality. Here, we report on a generic mechanism for the generation and control of nonlinear chiral light in resonant optical systems. We reveal that nonlinear resonant generation of circularly polarized light from achiral dielectric metasurfaces is extremely sensitive to the polarization state of the fundamental wave, and a resonant metasurface can produce light with arbitrary degree of nonlinear chirality (DNC). Experimentally, we demonstrate that the chirality of nonlinear radiation from one metasurface can be continuously tuned from DNC = -0.86 to DNC = 0.94 by simply varying the polarization angle of the incident wave. By further exploiting the instantaneous polarization state, nonlinear chirality has been switched in a delay time step of 3.2 fs, which is orders of magnitude more sensitive than the current state-of-the-art polarization modulation. These results promise to enrich our understanding of nonlinear processes in chiral structures and their manipulation with resonant photonic structures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06683 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Nonlinear radiation with arbitrary chirality generated by a resonant metasurface. A. Schematics for the generation of LCP (left panel) and RCP (right panel) THG with the same Si metasurface. The reversal of THG handedness is achieved with a simple change in polarization direction (θ). Inserts show the three-dimensional schematic diagram of one unit cell with structural parameters. B. Linear transmission under the y-… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Working principle for arbitrary chirality of TH radiation. A. The amplitudes (solid lines) and phases (dashed lines) of the x- and y-components of the superposition of forward TH radiation induced by the x and y components of the uncoupled field 𝐄0 (3𝜔) “x uncp” and “y uncp” (top two panels), and the amplitudes (solid lines) and phases (dashed lines) of the main component (y component for mode 1, and x component for… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Experimental demonstration of arbitrary chiral THG from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: All-optical control of nonlinear chirality in Si metasurface. A. Schematic of the all￾optical nonlinear chirality control. Two pulses with different polarization states and a tunable time delay are employed to control the time-variable polarization state. Inserts show …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K., Baumberg, J

    Valev, V. K., Baumberg, J. J., Sibilia, C. and Verbiest, T., Chirality and chiroptical effects in plasmonic nanostructures: fundamentals, recent progress, and outlook. Adv. Mater. 25, 2517- 2534 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    and Zablocky, P

    Engheta, N. and Zablocky, P. G., Effect of chirality on the transient signal wave front. Opt. Lett. 16, 1924-1926 (1991)

    work page 1924

  3. [3]

    and Kivshar, Y ., Nonlinear chiral metaphotonics: A Perspective

    Koshelev, K., Tonkaev, P. and Kivshar, Y ., Nonlinear chiral metaphotonics: A Perspective. Adv. Photon. 5, 064001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    and Cohen, A

    Tang, Y . and Cohen, A. E., Enhanced enantioselectivity in excitation of chiral molecules by superchiral light. Science 332, 333-336 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    et al., Synthetic chiral light for efficient control of chiral light–matter interaction

    Ayuso, D. et al., Synthetic chiral light for efficient control of chiral light–matter interaction. Nat. Photon. 13, 866–871 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    V ., Antonov, A

    Gorkunov, M. V ., Antonov, A. A. and Kivshar, Y . S., Metasurfaces with maximum chirality empowered by bound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 093903 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    and Alu, A., Chiral quasi-bound states in the continuum

    Overvig, A., Yu, N. and Alu, A., Chiral quasi-bound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 073001 (2021). 16

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    et al., Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum

    Chen, Y. et al., Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum. Nature 613, 474-478 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    and Song, Q., Chiral emission from resonant metasurfaces

    Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Han, J., Kivshar, Y. and Song, Q., Chiral emission from resonant metasurfaces. Science 377, 1215-1218 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Valev, V. K. et al., Nonlinear superchiral meta-surfaces: tuning chirality and disentangling non-reciprocity at the nanoscale. Adv. Mater. 26, 4074-4081 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    et al., Spin and wavelength multiplexed nonlinear metasurface holography

    Ye, W. et al., Spin and wavelength multiplexed nonlinear metasurface holography. Nat. Commun. 7, 11930 (2016). DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11930 (2016)

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    E., Averbukh, V

    Alon, O. E., Averbukh, V . and Moiseyev, I. V ., Selection Rules for the High Harmonic Generation Spectra. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3743-3746 (1998)

    1998

  5. [13]

    and Zheludev, N

    Ren, M., Plum, E., Xu, J. and Zheludev, N. I., Giant nonlinear optical activity in a plasmonic metamaterial. Nat. Commun. 3, 833 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    et al., Symmetry-selective third-harmonic generation from plasmonic metacrystals

    Chen, S. et al., Symmetry-selective third-harmonic generation from plasmonic metacrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 033901 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    I., Park, H.-G

    Frizyuk, K., Melik-Gaykazyan, E., Choi, J.-H., Petrov, M. I., Park, H.-G. and Kivshar, Y ., Nonlinear circular dichroism in Mie-resonant nanoparticle dimers. Nano Lett. 21, 4381-4387 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    et al., Planar chiral metasurfaces with maximal and tunable chiroptical response driven by bound states in the continuum

    Shi, T. et al., Planar chiral metasurfaces with maximal and tunable chiroptical response driven by bound states in the continuum. Nat. Commun. 13, 4111 (2022). 17

    2022

  9. [17]

    I., Li, G

    Koshelev, K., Tang, Y ., Hu, Z., Kravchenko, I. I., Li, G. and Kivshar, Y ., Resonant chiral effects in nonlinear dielectric metasurfaces. ACS Photon. 10, 298-306 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    et al., Giant nonlinear optical activity of achiral origin in planar metasurfaces with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities

    Chen, S. et al., Giant nonlinear optical activity of achiral origin in planar metasurfaces with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities. Adv. Mater. 28, 2992-2999 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    and Frizyuk, K., Nonlinear circular dichroism in achiral dielectric metasurfaces

    Nikitina, A., Nikolaeva, A. and Frizyuk, K., Nonlinear circular dichroism in achiral dielectric metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. B 107, L041405 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Toftul, I. et al. Chiral Dichroism in Resonant Metasurfaces with Monoclinic Lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216901 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    & Kivshar, Y

    Koshelev, K., Toftul, I., Hwang, Y . & Kivshar, Y . Scattering matrix for chiral harmonic generation and frequency mixing in nonlinear metasurfaces. J. Opt. 26, 055003 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Toftul, I. et al. Monoclinic nonlinear metasurfaces for resonant engineering of polarization states. Nanophotonics (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    et al., All-optical polarization and amplitude modulation of second-harmonic generation in atomically thin semiconductors

    Klimmer, S. et al., All-optical polarization and amplitude modulation of second-harmonic generation in atomically thin semiconductors. Nat. Photon. 15, 837-842 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Nicholls, L. H. et al., Ultrafast synthesis and switching of light polarization in nonlinear anisotropic metamaterials. Nat. Photon. 11, 628-633 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    and Joannopoulos, J

    Fan, S., Suh, W. and Joannopoulos, J. D., Temporal coupled-mode theory for the Fano resonance in optical resonators. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 569-572 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    W., Zhen, B., Stone, A

    Hsu, C. W., Zhen, B., Stone, A. D., Joannopoulos, J. D. and Soljačić, M., Bound states in the continuum. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16048 (2016). 18

    2016

  19. [27]

    et al., Subwavelength dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics

    Koshelev, K. et al., Subwavelength dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics. Science 367, 288-292 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    C., Light scattering by small particles, Dover Publications, New York, 1981, ISBN 0-486-64228-3

    van de Hulst, H. C., Light scattering by small particles, Dover Publications, New York, 1981, ISBN 0-486-64228-3

    1981

  21. [29]

    et al., Reprogrammable meta-hologram for optical encryption

    Qu, G. et al., Reprogrammable meta-hologram for optical encryption. Nat. Commun. 11, 5484 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    and Xiao, S., Nonlinear holographic all- dielectric metasurfaces

    Gao, Y., Fan, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, W., Song, Q. and Xiao, S., Nonlinear holographic all- dielectric metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 18, 8054-8061 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    A., Propagation-induced changes in the instantaneous polarization state, phase, and carrier-envelope phase of few-cycle pulsed beams, J

    Porras, M. A., Propagation-induced changes in the instantaneous polarization state, phase, and carrier-envelope phase of few-cycle pulsed beams, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 1652-1659 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    et al., Ultrafast control of vortex microlasers

    Huang, C. et al., Ultrafast control of vortex microlasers. Science 367, 1018-1021 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    et al., All-optical free-space routing of upconverted light by metasurfaces via nonlinear interferometry

    Di Francescantonio, A. et al., All-optical free-space routing of upconverted light by metasurfaces via nonlinear interferometry. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 298-305 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Kinsey, N., DeVault, C., Kim, J., Ferrera, M., Shalaev, V . M. and Boltasseva, A., Epsilon- near-zero Al-doped ZnO for ultrafast switching at telecom wavelengths. Optica 2, 616-622 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    et al., Efficient ultrafast all-optical modulation in a nonlinear crystalline gallium phosphide nanodisk at the anapole excitation

    Grinblat, G. et al., Efficient ultrafast all-optical modulation in a nonlinear crystalline gallium phosphide nanodisk at the anapole excitation. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb3123 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    et al., All-optical ultrafast polarization switching with nonlinear plasmonic metasurfaces

    Wang, H. et al., All-optical ultrafast polarization switching with nonlinear plasmonic metasurfaces. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk3882 (2024). 19

    2024

  29. [37]

    Y., Guo, X., Ni, X., Liu, Z., Werner, D

    Kang, L., Wang, C. Y., Guo, X., Ni, X., Liu, Z., Werner, D. H., Nonlinear chiral meta- mirrors: enabling technology for ultrafast switching of light polarization. Nano Lett. 20, 2047-2055 (2020)

  30. [38]

    et al., Chirality tuning and reversing with resonant phase-change metasurfaces

    Sha, X. et al., Chirality tuning and reversing with resonant phase-change metasurfaces. Sci. Adv. 10, eadn9017 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    et al., Continuous control of the nonlinearity phase for harmonic generations

    Li, G. et al., Continuous control of the nonlinearity phase for harmonic generations. Nature Mater 14, 607–612 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    x uncp” and “y uncp

    Smirnova, D. A., Miroshnichenko, A. E., Kivshar, Y . S., & Khanikaev, A. B., Tunable nonlinear graphene metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. B 92, 161406 (2015). 20 Figure 1: Nonlinear radiation with arbitrary chirality generated by a resonant metasurface. A. Schematics for the generation...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.