Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 79 references

Single-ion anisotropy driven chiral magnetic order in a spin-1 antiferromagnetic chain

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Neutron diffraction shows that the chiral magnetic order of a spin-1 nickel chain is imposed by the four-fold twist of its easy-axis anisotropy pattern, not by Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions.

desk verdict A solid multi-technique characterization of a new chiral S=1 chain, but the headline claim that single-ion anisotropy alone drives the chiral order is not airtight because the symmetry-allowed DM terms are never bounded and the fitted D/J0 underpredicts the measured canting. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07173 v1 pith:5AOZMBEB submitted 2025-09-08 cond-mat.str-el

S. Vaidya , S. P. M. Curley , P. Manuel , J. Ross Stewart , M. Duc Le , A. Hernández-Melián , T. J. Hicken , C. Wang
show 12 more authors
H. Luetkens J. Krieger S. J. Blundell T. Lancaster K. A. Wheeler D. Y. Villa Z. E. Manson J. A. Villa J. L. Manson J. Singleton R. D. Johnson P. A. Goddard
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords chiralmagneticordersingle-ionanisotropyspin-1chainantiferromagneticneutrondiffractioninelasticscatteringDzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteractionpyrimidine-bridgednickel(II)coordinationpolymer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies [Ni(pym)(H2O)4]SO4·H2O (pym = pyrimidine), a spin-1 ($S=1$, meaning each Ni(II) ion carries one unit of quantum spin) antiferromagnetic chain in which the Ni(II) octahedra rotate by 90 degrees from site to site in a four-fold chiral pattern along the chain. Combining muon-spin rotation, neutron diffraction, inelastic neutron scattering, and pulsed-field magnetization, it presents evidence that below 1.82 K the moments form a commensurate antiferromagnet in which the chain-axis components alternate and the in-plane components rotate by 90 degrees from site to site—a magnetic helix. The central claim is that this helix is caused by the single-ion anisotropy (each spin's local preference to point along its octahedron's long axis), which mirrors the four-fold chiral crystal pattern, so the order arises without Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions (antisymmetric spin-orbit exchange that favors a particular twist), geometrical frustration, or higher-order exchange. This matters because it offers a design principle: chiral magnetic order can be engineered by arranging local anisotropy axes in the crystal structure, and the strength of the effect should be tunable through pressure or chemical substitution.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the site-dependent single-ion anisotropy tensor $K_i$. In each Ni(II) octahedron's local frame the anisotropy is $\mathrm{diag}[0,0,D]$; rotating this tensor by the tilt angle $\alpha = 49.26(8)^\circ$ and by four-fold angles $\gamma_i = 0^\circ, 90^\circ, 180^\circ, 270^\circ$ about the chain axis produces easy axes that themselves wind around the chain like a helix. The argument is carried by a minimal mean-field model containing only $J_0$ and $D$, whose energy per spin, $\varepsilon = -J\cos^2\theta + D\cos^2(\theta-\alpha)$, yields the identity $$\frac{D}{J_0} = \frac{\sin 2\$\theta$}{2\sin(\$\theta$-\$\alpha$)\cos(\$\theta$-\$\alpha$)},$$ which connects the measured canting angle to the ratio of exchange and anisotropy. This single identity is what allows the paper to claim that pure single-ion anisotropy, with no DM terms, is sufficient to reproduce the observed chiral canting.

What would settle it

A first-principles calculation of the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya vector on the pyrimidine-mediated exchange bond would settle the point: if its magnitude is comparable to the fitted $D = 3.02$ K or $J_0 = 6.81$ K rather than negligible, the omission is invalid and the central causal claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the zero-field ordered state of [Ni(pym)(H2O)4]SO4·H2O is a chiral antiferromagnet whose handedness is fixed by the crystal structure rather than by spin-orbit-driven DM exchange. Powder neutron diffraction below $T_N = 1.82(2)$ K yields magnetic Bragg peaks at the propagation vector $(1/2, 1/2, 0)$, and the best refinement describes spins that are antiparallel along the chain axis while their in-plane components rotate by 90 degrees from one site to the next, canting by $\theta = 17.8(9)^\circ$ from the chain axis. The mechanism is the easy-axis single-ion anisotropy $D = -3.02(1)$ K: each Ni(II) octahedron's local easy axis is tilted $49.26(8)^\circ$ from the chain axis and rotates by $0^\circ, 90^\circ, 180^\circ, 270^\circ$ along the chain, so minimizing the energy winds the moments into a helix. Inelastic neutron scattering fixes the intrachain exchange at $J_0 = 6.81(1)$ K and the leading interchain coupling at $J'_{1a} = -0.091(1)$ K; a mean-field estimate using only $J_0$ and $D$ relates the observed canting to $D/J_0 \approx 0.65(4)$.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya exchange—the spin-orbit coupling that favors one twist sense between neighboring spins—is negligibly small in this compound, even though the crystal symmetry permits a uniform c-axis component and a four-fold staggered in-plane component; if DM coupling is not small, the observed chiral order could be DM-driven and the claimed single-ion-anisotropy mechanism would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the chiral order is anisotropy-driven, the magnetic helicity is locked to the crystal's $P4_1$ screw chirality and is commensurate, so it avoids the fragility that comes with DM- or frustration-driven order.
  • Because $D/J_0$ is tunable by pressure or ligand substitution in these coordination polymers, the canting angle and the presence of the chiral phase should be controllable in a predictable way.
  • For fields applied along the chain, the model predicts a high-field chiral ferromagnetic phase rather than full spin polarization, with magnetization continuing to rise toward a saturation value that is only reached in the infinite-field limit.
  • If the order is anisotropy-driven, the spin dynamics should be revisited with models that go beyond linear spin-wave theory: the measured spectrum contains dispersionless bands and an in-gap peak that the semiclassical approximation does not reproduce.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test not reported in the paper: grow enantiopure single crystals of known handedness and use polarized neutron diffraction to check that the sense of the moment rotation always matches the $P4_1$ screw sense; this would confirm the crystal-to-magnet chirality lock at the domain level.
  • If the anisotropy-axis mechanism is generic, then a purely crystallographic screen—tetragonal chiral space group plus a tilted local octahedral axis—could identify new $S=1$ chain candidates for chiral magnetic order before any magnetic measurement.
  • The in-gap 0.20 meV peak and the dispersionless bands could be probed by high-field electron spin resonance or single-crystal inelastic neutron scattering to decide whether they are impurity single-ion excitations, magnon bound states, or quadrupolar modes; each assignment has different implications for the strength and sign of the anisotropy terms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a comprehensive experimental study of the S=1 chiral chain compound [Ni(pym)(H2O)4]SO4·H2O. Combining single-crystal X-ray diffraction, magnetization, muon-spin rotation, elastic neutron diffraction, and inelastic neutron scattering (INS), the authors determine that the material orders magnetically below TN=1.82(2) K into a commensurate chiral antiferromagnetic structure with propagation vector k=(1/2,1/2,0). The magnetic structure, refined from powder neutron diffraction, has spins canted by θ=17.8(9)° from the c-axis with ab-plane components rotating by 90° between neighboring sites, and it is described by the mM1 irreducible representation (Rmag=8.4%, versus 11.9% for collinear and 36.1% for ab-plane alternatives). The INS data are fit to a linear spin-wave model with parameters J0=6.81(1) K, D=-3.02(1) K, and J'1a=-0.091(1) K, and the model is tested against pulsed-field magnetization curves. The paper's central claim is that the chiral order is driven by a chiral modulation of the easy-axis single-ion anisotropy direction, rather than by Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interactions, geometric frustration, or higher-order interactions.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper identifies a genuinely new design principle for chiral magnetic order: a four-fold chiral rotation of the single-ion anisotropy axis imposes a chiral spin texture without invoking DM interactions. The experimental characterization is unusually broad, combining magnetic structure determination, spin-wave spectroscopy, and field-dependent magnetization on the same material, and the magnetic structure determination is convincing based on the reported R-factors and symmetry analysis. The comparison between the independently measured canting angle and the value predicted from the fitted D/J0 is a meaningful, falsifiable test of the model. However, the central causal claim is not yet established, because the symmetry-allowed DM terms are omitted from the Hamiltonian without a quantitative bound, and the observed canting angle is under-predicted by the fitted model by about 5°, which is exactly the direction in which a modest DM contribution could act. The paper deserves publication after the authors provide a quantitative argument that DM interactions are negligible or explicitly include them in the analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II E and Eq. (5)] The Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) omits DM interactions, yet the text in Section II A explicitly states that the J0 exchange pathway is not at an inversion center, so DM terms are symmetry-allowed with a uniform c-axis component and a four-fold staggered ab-plane component. The observed magnetic structure—AFM c-axis components combined with 90°-rotating ab-plane components—is precisely the type of texture that a staggered ab-plane DM term can in principle stabilize. The only justifications given for neglecting DM are that it is 'expected to be small' in molecule-based Ni(II) systems and that previous pym-containing compounds did not require it; no quantitative bound is provided for this material. Because the paper's central claim is that the chiral order is not DM-driven, the authors must provide a concrete constraint on the DM magnitude, for example by adding DM terms to the spin-wave fit and showing they refine to negligible values, or by deriving an upper bound from the measured canting angle and the D/J0 discrepancy described below. Without such a bound, the causal claim is not supported.
  2. [Section II F] There is a quantitative internal inconsistency in the model. Using the measured θ=17.8(9)° and α=49.26(8)° in Eq. (5) yields |D|/J0≈0.65(4), while the LSWT fit reported in Section II E gives D/J0=0.443(5) and predicts θ≈12.6°, a shortfall of about 5° from the observed canting. The authors attribute this discrepancy to LSWT limitations, but the under-prediction is in the direction that a modest DM term (or another omitted interaction) could account for. The same concern is echoed in Section II F, where the Monte Carlo simulations overestimate the saturation feature (16.6 T vs. the observed 13.91 T) and the authors note that 'the D/J0 value might be slightly underestimated.' Since the central claim is that SIA alone drives the chiral order, the authors need to either (i) provide a calculation showing that quantum corrections of the expected size can explain the full 5° discrepancy, or (ii) show that the remaining discrepancy is too large to be explained by any symmetry-allowed DM term consistent with other data. As it stands, the observed canting angle is not quantitatively explained by the fitted SIA-only model.
  3. [Section II E, Fig. 7] The fitting procedure masks the data between 0.6 and 0.75 meV to exclude the dispersionless band at 0.70(1) meV, which is not reproduced by the model. While masking a feature that is not part of the LSWT description is a reasonable practical choice, it means the reported parameters do not account for a prominent part of the observed spectrum. The manuscript should state clearly that the fitted J0, D, and J'1a are determined only from the dispersive part of the spectrum and discuss how the presence of additional excitations might affect the fitted parameter values and their uncertainties.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II E] The sentence 'To quantify the Hamiltonian in Eq. 5' should refer to Eq. (1), not Eq. (5).
  2. [Section II C] The phrase 'performed on a powder samples' is grammatically incorrect; it should be 'on powder samples'.
  3. [Section II B] The text says 'For the H ⊥ c measurments, the crystallites were orientated such that the applied field was close to the crystallographic [1 0 0] direction.' The spelling 'measurments' should be corrected to 'measurements'.
  4. [Section II D] The sentence 'The parameters A3 ... were fitted globally across all temperatures' is clear, but the preceding sentence says 'the values of Ab = 8 % and λ3 = 0.55 μs−1 were found to be temperature-independent, and therefore fixed to their average values.' It would be helpful to state explicitly the uncertainty of Ab and λ3, as they are fixed rather than refined.
  5. [Section II F] The caption of Fig. 3 uses 'H || chain' and 'H ⊥ chain' while the text uses both 'chain' and 'c-axis'. For consistency, please define 'chain' as the c-axis in the caption or use 'H || c' and 'H ⊥ c' throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the magnetic structure is independently refined from neutron diffraction and the canting angle is a genuine, failing cross-check rather than a fitted output.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The chiral single-ion-anisotropy axes entering Eq. 1 are fixed by single-crystal XRD (the tilt angle alpha = 49.26(8) degrees and the four-fold rotations gamma_i = 0, 90, 180, 270 degrees), not by the magnetic data. The chiral magnetic structure is obtained independently by Rietveld refinement of the neutron diffraction difference data against candidate irreps, with the mM1 chiral structure giving Rmag = 8.398% versus 11.93% for the collinear structure and 36.06% for the ab-plane structure. The Hamiltonian parameters J0, D and J'1a are fitted to the 2D INS map, with the unmodeled 0.70 meV band explicitly masked, and are then used with the analytic mean-field formula Eq. 5 to predict a canting angle of about 12.6 degrees, whereas diffraction gives theta = 17.8(9) degrees. The paper acknowledges this mismatch, so the canting angle is a falsifiable cross-check rather than a fitted output. The Monte Carlo simulations of M(H) provide an additional external benchmark. The main weakness, namely the omission of symmetry-allowed DM terms from Eq. 1 justified partly by same-group prior work [20,25], is a correctness and assumption risk rather than circularity: no equation in the paper reduces the conclusion to its inputs, and the paper does not claim to have measured an upper bound on DM. Self-citations appear, but they are not load-bearing in the sense of importing an unverified uniqueness theorem; they support the smallness of DM in chemically similar materials and are accompanied by external citations [19,22]. Therefore no step satisfies the standard of exhibiting an Eq. X = Eq. Y reduction by construction or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central Hamiltonian parameters J0, D and J'1a are fitted to INS data rather than predicted. The causal claim additionally relies on an unmeasured smallness of DM interactions and on the adequacy of LSWT, both of which the paper itself flags as uncertain. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • J0 (intrachain exchange) = 6.81(3) K
    Fitted to powder INS data at 0.25 K using LSWT (SpinW) via Nelder-Mead against the I(|Q|,epsilon) map.
  • D (single-ion anisotropy) = -3.02(1) K
    Fitted to the INS spin-wave gap and dispersion; SpinW uses a renormalisation factor of [1-1/(2S)] = 1/2 for S=1.
  • J'1a (interchain exchange) = -0.091(1) K
    Fitted to the periodic gap modulation in Q; the other three interchain couplings J'1b, J'2a and J'2b are fixed to zero.
  • g factor = 2.18(1)
    Obtained from a Curie-Weiss fit to susceptibility and used in the Zeeman term and Monte Carlo magnetisation curves.
  • Monte Carlo field orientation for H perpendicular to chain = approximately 10 degrees from [100]
    Chosen to reproduce the H perpendicular to chain magnetisation data; the authors state it is within alignment error.
  • INS fitting mask window = 0.6 to 0.75 meV
    Data in this window were masked during fitting to aid convergence because the 0.70 meV flat band is not reproduced by the model.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DM interactions are negligible.
    Symmetry permits DM terms (Section II A), but Eq. 1 omits them; the central causal claim depends on this smallness.
  • domain assumption In-plane anisotropy E is negligible.
    The <1% variation in Ni-O bond lengths is used to assume uniaxial SIA; a sizable E would alter the Hamiltonian and the spin-wave fit.
  • domain assumption The g factor is isotropic.
    The Zeeman term uses an isotropic g; the authors estimate Delta g approximating 2D/lambda is small but they do not measure it directly.
  • domain assumption Linear spin wave theory is adequate to determine J0, D and J'1a.
    LSWT fails to reproduce flat bands and under-predicts the canting angle (12.6 vs 17.8 degrees), so the fitted parameters may be biased.
  • ad hoc to paper Only J'1a of the four interchain pathways is nonzero.
    J'1b, J'2a and J'2b are fixed to zero to make the fit converge; the authors note the individual interchain exchanges cannot be uniquely determined.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Single-ion anisotropy driven chiral magnetic order in a spin-1 antiferromagnetic chain." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5AOZMBEB

@misc{pith2026250907173,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Single-ion anisotropy driven chiral magnetic order in a spin-1 antiferromagnetic chain},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5AOZMBEB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07173}
}
abstract

Chirality in magnetic systems gives rise to a wide range of exotic phenomena, yet its influence in $S=1$ chains remains largely unexplored. Here, we present a comprehensive experimental study of a chiral antiferromagnetic (AFM) $S=1$ chain, [Ni(pym)(H$_{2}$O)$_{4}$]SO$_{4} \cdot$ H$_{2}$O (pym = pyrimidine), where the Ni(II) octahedral orientation exhibits a four-fold chiral periodicity. Muon spin rotation measurements indicate the onset of long-range magnetic order below $T_{\rm N} = 1.82(2)\,\mathrm{K}$. Neutron diffraction measurements reveal a chiral AFM order driven by a chiral modulation of the easy-axis anisotropy direction, rather than the typical scenario of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, geometrical frustration or higher-order interactions. Inelastic neutron scattering (INS) measurements reveal dispersive spin-wave excitations well described by linear spin-wave theory, with Hamiltonian parameters $J_{0} = 6.81(1)\,\mathrm{K}$ (intrachain exchange), $J'_{1\rm a} = -0.091(1)\,\mathrm{K}$ (interchain exchange), and $D = -3.02(1)\,\mathrm{K}$ (easy-axis single-ion anisotropy). These parameters are further validated by Monte Carlo simulations of the magnetisation. Additionally, the INS data reveal multiple dispersionless bands, suggesting the presence of further excitations beyond the scope of our linear spin-wave theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07173 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The structure and exchange pathways of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Zero-field-cooled temperature dependent magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Representative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Field-dependent magnetization, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Zero-field magnetic structure of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Time of flight powder inelastic neutron scattering (INS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Representative line cuts of the inelastic neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (5) Substituting α = 49 .26(8)◦ and θ = 17 .8(9)◦ into Eq

    As derived in the Supplementary Material [ 31], this model yields the expression D J0 = sin 2θ 2 sin(θ − α) cos(θ − α) . (5) Substituting α = 49 .26(8)◦ and θ = 17 .8(9)◦ into Eq. 5 yields an estimated ratio of |D|/J0 ≈ 0.65(4), which is reasonably similar to the D/J ratio in other Ni(II) sys- tems [ 19, 22, 25]. E. Inelastic neutron scattering To quantif...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Yan and C

    B. Yan and C. Felser, Topological Materials: Weyl Semimetals, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 8, 337 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    Saito, K

    M. Saito, K. Ishikawa, K. Taniguchi, and T. Arima, Mag- netic control of crystal chirality and the existence of a large magneto-optical dichroism effect in CuB 2O4, Phys- ical Review Letters 101, 117402 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Sessoli, M.-E

    R. Sessoli, M.-E. Boulon, A. Caneschi, M. Mannini, L. Poggini, F. Wilhelm, and A. Rogalev, Strong magneto- 10 chiral dichroism in a paramagnetic molecular helix ob- served by hard X-rays, Nature Physics 11, 69 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Symmetry analysis using isodistort [ 40, 41] reveals three candidate symmetries for the magnetic struc- ture: irreducible representation (irreps) mM1, mM2 and mM3 ⊕ mM4

    The subtracted data reveals several magnetic Bragg reflections which are indexed by the commensurate propagation vector k = (1 /2, 1/2, 0). Symmetry analysis using isodistort [ 40, 41] reveals three candidate symmetries for the magnetic struc- ture: irreducible representation (irreps) mM1, mM2 and mM3 ⊕ mM4. The irrep mM2 corresponds to FM order along the ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Spins cant toward the local Ni–N axes, indicating an easy-axis SIA, consistent with our previous report on the non-chiral Ni staggered chain, Ni(pym)(H 2O)2(NO3)2, which hosts a similar Ni(II) octahedral environment [ 20]. The sup- pression of the ordered moment size, from the classical expectation value of gS ≈ 1.99 µB observed at high-field, indicates th...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Bousquet, M

    E. Bousquet, M. Fava, Z. Romestan, F. G´ omez-Ortiz, E. E. McCabe, and A. H. Romero, Structural chirality and related properties in periodic inorganic solids: review and perspectives, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 37, 163004 (2025) , publisher: IOP Publishing

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Science of 100 T

    The value of D obtained from the fit is in reason- able agreement with the value implied by the 0 .20(8) meV in-gap peak. The SIA parameter used in SpinW simu- lations is renormalised by a factor [1 − 1/(2S)] to ac- count for the non-linear contributions to the SIA which are omitted in LSWT [ 45, 46]. The results imply a ratio D/J0 = 0 .443(5) and Eq. 5 yi...

    work page

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Bord´ acs, I

    S. Bord´ acs, I. K´ ezsm´ arki, D. Szaller, L. Demk´ o, N. Kida, H. Murakawa, Y. Onose, R. Shimano, T. R˜ o˜ om, U. Nagel, S. Miyahara, N. Furukawa, and Y. Tokura, Chirality of matter shows up via spin excitations, Nature Physics 8, 734 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Nakagawa, N

    N. Nakagawa, N. Abe, S. Toyoda, S. Kimura, J. Zac- caro, I. Gautier-Luneau, D. Luneau, Y. Kousaka, A. Sera, M. Sera, K. Inoue, J. Akimitsu, Y. Tokunaga, and T. Arima, Magneto-chiral dichroism of CsCuCl 3, Phys- ical Review B 96, 121102 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    M¨ uhlbauer, B

    S. M¨ uhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pflei- derer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. B¨ oni, Skyrmion lattice in a chi- ral magnet, Science 323, 915 (2009) , https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1166767

    2009 doi

  4. [12]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nature Reviews Materials 2, 1 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Lancaster, Skyrmions in magnetic materials, Contem- porary Physics 60, 246 (2019)

    T. Lancaster, Skyrmions in magnetic materials, Contem- porary Physics 60, 246 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    D. A. Mayoh, J. Bouaziz, A. E. Hall, J. B. Staunton, M. R. Lees, and G. Balakrishnan, Giant topological and planar hall effect in Cr 1/3NbS2, Physical Review Re- search 4, 013134 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    G. L. J. A. Rikken, A new twist on spintronics, Science 331, 864 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Emori, U

    S. Emori, U. Bauer, S.-M. Ahn, E. Martinez, and G. S. Beach, Current-driven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls, Nature Materials 12, 611 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    K. Wang, V. Bheemarasetty, J. Duan, S. Zhou, and G. Xiao, Fundamental physics and applications of skyrmions: a review, Journal of Magnetism and Mag- netic Materials 563, 169905 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    H. Wang, Y. Dai, G.-M. Chow, and J. Chen, Topologi- cal hall transport: Materials, mechanisms and potential applications, Progress in Materials Science 130, 100971 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Cheong and X

    S.-W. Cheong and X. Xu, Magnetic chirality, npj Quan- tum Materials 7, 40 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Marty, V

    K. Marty, V. Simonet, E. Ressouche, R. Ballou, P. Le- jay, and P. Bordet, Single domain magnetic helic- ity and triangular chirality in structurally enantiopure Ba3NbFe3Si2O14, Physical Review Letters 101, 247201 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    R. D. Johnson, K. Cao, L. C. Chapon, F. Fabrizi, N. Perks, P. Manuel, J. J. Yang, Y. S. Oh, S.-W. Cheong, and P. G. Radaelli, MnSb 2O6: a polar magnet with a chiral crystal structure, Physical Review Letters 111, 017202 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    N. D. Khanh, T. Nakajima, X. Yu, S. Gao, K. Shi- bata, M. Hirschberger, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, L. Peng, K. Nakajima, R. Takagi, T.-h. Arima, Y. Tokura, and S. Seki, Nanometric square skyrmion lattice in a centrosymmetric tetragonal magnet, Nature Nanotechnology 15...

    2020

  15. [23]

    Huang and I

    H. Huang and I. Affleck, Susceptibility and dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction in the haldane- gap compound Ni(C 2H8N2)2NO2(ClO4), Phys. Rev. B 69, 184414 (2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    Vaidya, S

    S. Vaidya, S. P. M. Curley, P. Manuel, J. R. Stewart, M. D. Le, C. Balz, T. Shiroka, S. J. Blundell, K. A. Wheeler, I. Calderon-Lin, Z. E. Manson, J. L. Manson, J. Singleton, T. Lancaster, R. D. Johnson, and P. A. Goddard, Magnetic properties of a staggered S = 1 chain with an...

    2025

  17. [25]

    Feyerherm, A

    R. Feyerherm, A. Loose, T. Ishida, T. Nogami, J. Kre- itlow, D. Baabe, F. J. Litterst, S. S¨ ullow, H.-H. Klauss, and K. Doll, Weak ferromagnetism with very large cant- ing in a chiral lattice: Fe(pyrimidine) 2Cl2, Phys. Rev. B 69, 134427 (2004)

    2004

  18. [26]

    Pitcairn, M

    J. Pitcairn, M. A. Ongkiko, A. Iliceto, P. J. Speakman, S. Calder, M. J. Cochran, J. A. M. Paddison, C. Liu, S. P. Argent, A. J. Morris, and M. J. Cliffe, Controlling non- collinear ferromagnetism in van der Waals metal–organic magnets, Journal of the American Chemical Society ...

    2024

  19. [27]

    K. Y. Povarov, L. Facheris, S. Velja, D. Blosser, Z. Yan, S. Gvasaliya, and A. Zheludev, Magnetization plateaux cascade in the frustrated quantum antiferro- magnet Cs 2CoBr4, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043384 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Facheris, S

    L. Facheris, S. D. Nabi, K. Y. Povarov, Z. Yan, A. G. Moshe, U. Nagel, T. R˜ o om, A. Podlesnyak, E. Ressouche, K. Beauvois, J. R. Stewart, P. Manuel, D. Khalyavin, F. Orlandi, and A. Zheludev, Magnetic field induced phases and spin hamiltonian in Cs 2CoBr4, Phys. Rev. B 109, 1...

    2024

  21. [29]

    Vaidya, A

    S. Vaidya, A. Hern´ andez-Meli´ an, J. P. Tidey, S. P. M. Curley, S. Sharma, P. Manuel, C. Wang, G. L. Han- naford, S. J. Blundell, Z. E. Manson, J. L. Manson, J. Singleton, T. Lancaster, R. D. Johnson, and P. A. Goddard, Pseudo-easy-axis anisotropy in antiferromag- netic S = ...

    2024

  22. [30]

    D. C. Dender, P. R. Hammar, D. H. Reich, C. Broholm, and G. Aeppli, Direct observation of field-induced incom- mensurate fluctuations in a one-dimensional S = 1/2 an- tiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1750 (1997)

    1997

  23. [31]

    Feyerherm, S

    R. Feyerherm, S. Abens, D. G¨ unther, T. Ishida, M. Meißner, M. Meschke, T. Nogami, and M. Steiner, Magnetic-field induced gap and staggered susceptibility in the S = 1 /2 chain [PMCu(NO 3)2(H2O)2]n (PM= pyrimidine), Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 12, 8495 (2000)

    2000

  24. [32]

    S. A. Zvyagin, A. K. Kolezhuk, J. Krzystek, and R. Fey- erherm, Excitation hierarchy of the quantum sine-gordon spin chain in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 027201 (2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    B. M. Huddart, M. Gomilˇ sek, T. J. Hicken, F. L. Pratt, S. J. Blundell, P. A. Goddard, S. J. Kaech, J. L. Man- son, and T. Lancaster, Magnetic order and ballistic spin transport in a sine-Gordon spin chain, Phys. Rev. B 103, L060405 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    J. Liu, S. Kittaka, R. D. Johnson, T. Lancaster, J. Single- ton, T. Sakakibara, Y. Kohama, J. van Tol, A. Ardavan, B. H. Williams, S. J. Blundell, Z. E. Manson, J. L. Man- son, and P. A. Goddard, Unconventional field-induced spin gap in an S = 1 /2 chiral staggered chain, Physi...

    2019

  27. [35]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher]

  28. [36]

    Boˇ ca, Zero-field splitting in metal complexes, Coordi- nation Chemistry Reviews 248, 757 (2004)

    R. Boˇ ca, Zero-field splitting in metal complexes, Coordi- nation Chemistry Reviews 248, 757 (2004)

    2004

  29. [37]

    J. L. Manson, Z. E. Manson, A. Sargent, D. Y. Villa, N. L. Etten, W. J. Blackmore, S. P. Curley, R. C. Williams, J. Brambleby, P. A. Goddard, A. Ozarowski, 11 M. N. Wilson, B. M. Huddart, T. Lancaster, R. D. John- son, S. J. Blundell, J. Bendix, K. A. Wheeler, S. H. Lapidus, F...

    2020

  30. [38]

    A. J. Steele, T. Lancaster, S. J. Blundell, P. J. Baker, F. L. Pratt, C. Baines, M. M. Conner, H. I. Souther- land, J. L. Manson, and J. A. Schlueter, Magnetic order in quasi-two-dimensional molecular magnets investigated with muon-spin relaxation, Phys. Rev. B 84, 064412 (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    S. J. Blundell, R. D. Renzi, T. Lancaster, and F. L. Pratt, eds., Muon Spectroscopy - An Introduction (Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    For AFMs, α typically lies between 2 and 3

    The exponent α describes the low-temperature behavior of the order parameter, while β characterizes its behavior near TN. For AFMs, α typically lies between 2 and 3. However, in our fitting procedure, α tended to have large non-physical values. We therefore constrained α to a fi...

  33. [41]

    L. C. Chapon, P. Manuel, P. G. Radaelli, C. Ben- son, L. Perrott, S. Ansell, N. J. Rhodes, D. Raspino, D. Duxbury, E. Spill, et al. , WISH: The new powder and single crystal magnetic diffractometer on the second tar- get station, Neutron News 22, 22 (2011)

    2011

  34. [42]

    Vaidya, P

    S. Vaidya, P. Manuel, M. Coak, R. Johnson, J. Manson, and P. Goddard, (2022), Magnetic ground states of stag- gered and chiral integer-spin chains, STFC ISIS Neutron and Muon Source, https://doi.org/10.5286/ISIS.E. RB2210219

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    Rodr ´ ıguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction, Physica B: Condensed Matter 192, 55 (1993)

    J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction, Physica B: Condensed Matter 192, 55 (1993)

    1993

  36. [44]

    H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, and B. J. Campbell, ISODIS- TORT, ISOTROPY Software Suite, iso.byu.edu,

  37. [45]

    B. J. Campbell, H. T. Stokes, D. E. Tanner, and D. M. Hatch, ISODISPLACE: a web-based tool for exploring structural distortions, Journal of Applied Crystallogra- phy 39, 607 (2006)

    2006

  38. [46]

    Bewley, J

    R. Bewley, J. Taylor, and S. Bennington., LET, a cold neutron multi-disk chopper spectrometer at ISIS, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 637, 128 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    Vaidya, R

    S. Vaidya, R. Steward, R. Johnson, J. Manson, and P. Goddard, (2023), Measuring magnetic anisotropy and magnetic excitations in staggered and chiral spin- 1 chains, STFC ISIS Neutron and Muon Source, https: //doi.org/10.5286/ISIS.E.RB2310305

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    Toth and B

    S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single-Q incommensurate magnetic structures, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27, 166002 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    E. M. Wheeler, R. Coldea, E. Wawrzy´ nska, T. S¨ orgel, M. Jansen, M. M. Koza, J. Taylor, P. Adroguer, and N. Shannon, Spin dynamics of the frustrated easy-axis triangular antiferromagnet 2 H-AgNiO2 explored by in- elastic neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B 79, 104421 (2009)

    2009

  42. [50]

    Dahlbom, H

    D. Dahlbom, H. Zhang, Z. Laraib, D. M.Pajerowski, K. Barros, and C. Batista, Renormalized classical theory of quantum magnets, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03874 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Songvilay, S

    M. Songvilay, S. Petit, F. Damay, G. Roux, N. Qureshi, H. C. Walker, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, B. Gao, S.-W. Cheong, and C. Stock, From one- to two-magnon exci- tations in the S = 3 /2 magnet β−CaCr2O4, Physical Review Letters 126, 017201 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    J. L. Manson, D. M. Pajerowski, J. M. Donovan, B. Twamley, P. A. Goddard, R. Johnson, J. Bendix, J. Singleton, T. Lancaster, S. J. Blundell, J. Herbrych, P. J. Baker, A. J. Steele, F. L. Pratt, I. Franke-Chaudet, R. D. McDonald, A. Plonczak, and P. Manuel, Spatially anisotropi...

    2023

  45. [53]

    Bai, S.-S

    X. Bai, S.-S. Zhang, Z. Dun, H. Zhang, Q. Huang, H. Zhou, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, F. Ye, C. D. Batista, and M. Mourigal, Hybridized quadrupolar ex- citations in the spin-anisotropic frustrated magnet FeI 2, Nature Physics 17, 467 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Sakamoto, T

    S. Sakamoto, T. Higo, M. Shiga, K. Amemiya, S. Nakat- suji, and S. Miwa, Observation of spontaneous X-ray magnetic circular dichroism in a chiral antiferromagnet, Physical Review B 104, 134431 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Okamoto, R.-P

    J. Okamoto, R.-P. Wang, Y.-Y. Chu, H.-W. Shiu, A. Singh, H.-Y. Huang, C.-Y. Mou, S. Teh, H.-T. Jeng, K. Du, X. Xu, S.-W. Cheong, C.-H. Du, C.-T. Chen, A. Fujimori, and D.-J. Huang, Giant X-ray circular dichroism in a time-reversal invariant antiferromagnet, Advanced Materials ...

    2024

  48. [56]

    Wierschem and P

    K. Wierschem and P. Sengupta, Quenching the Haldane Gap in Spin-1 Heisenberg Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 247203 (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    J. A. Schlueter, H. Park, G. J. Halder, W. R. Armand, C. Dunmars, K. W. Chapman, J. L. Manson, J. Sin- gleton, R. McDonald, A. Plonczak, J. Kang, C. Lee, M.-H. Whangbo, T. Lancaster, A. J. Steele, I. Franke, J. D. Wright, S. J. Blundell, F. L. Pratt, J. deGe- orge, M. M. Turnb...

    2012

  50. [58]

    Cortijo, S

    M. Cortijo, S. Herrero, R. Jimenez-Aparicio, and E. Matesanz, Modulation of the magnetic properties of two-dimensional compounds [Ni X2(N–N)] by tailoring their crystal structure, Inorganic Chemistry 52, 7087 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    Cortijo, S

    M. Cortijo, S. Herrero, R. Jimenez-Aparicio, J. Perles, J. L. Priego, and J. Torroba, Tuning of adsorption and magnetic properties in a series of self-templated isostruc- tural Ni(II) metal-organic frameworks, Crystal Growth & Design 14, 716 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    J. Liu, P. A. Goddard, J. Singleton, J. Brambleby, F. Foronda, J. S. M¨ oller, Y. Kohama, S. Ghannadzadeh, A. Ardavan, S. J. Blundell, T. Lancaster, F. Xiao, R. C. Williams, F. L. Pratt, P. J. Baker, K. Wierschem, S. H. Lapidus, K. H. Stone, P. W. Stephens, J. Bendix, T. J. Wo...

    2016

  53. [61]

    Kubus, A

    M. Kubus, A. Lanza, R. Scatena, L. H. R. Dos Santos, B. Wehinger, N. Casati, C. Fiolka, L. Keller, P. Macchi, C. R¨ uegg, and K. W. Kr¨ amer, Quasi-2d Heisenberg an- tiferromagnets [Cu X(pyz)2](BF4) with X= Cl and Br, 12 Inorganic Chemistry 57, 4934 (2018)

    2018

  54. [62]

    W. J. A. Blackmore, S. P. M. Curley, R. C. Williams, S. Vaidya, J. Singleton, S. Birnbaum, A. Ozarowski, J. A. Schlueter, Y.-S. Chen, B. Gillon, A. Goukassov, I. Kibalin, D. Y. Villa, J. A. Villa, J. L. Manson, and P. A. Goddard, Magneto-structural correlations in Ni2+–Halide·...

    2022

  55. [63]

    D. M. Pajerowski, A. P. Podlesnyak, J. Herbrych, and J. Manson, High-pressure inelastic neutron scat- tering study of the anisotropic S = 1 spin chain Ni(HF2)(3−Clpyradine)4]BF4, Physical Review B 105, 134420 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    M. J. Coak, S. P. M. Curley, Z. Hawkhead, J. P. Tidey, D. Graf, S. J. Clark, P. Sengupta, Z. E. Manson, T. Lan- caster, P. A. Goddard, and J. L. Manson, Asymmetric phase diagram and dimensional crossover in a system of spin- 1 2 dimers under applied hydrostatic pressure, Phys-...

    2023

  57. [65]

    Geers, D

    M. Geers, D. M. Jarvis, C. Liu, S. S. Saxena, J. Pitcairn, E. Myatt, S. A. Hallweger, S. M. Kronawitter, G. Kies- lich, S. Ling, A. B. Cairns, D. Daisenberger, O. Fabelo, L. Ca˜ nadillas Delgado, and M. J. Cliffe, High-pressure behavior of the magnetic van der waals molecular f...

    2023

  58. [66]

    K. Y. Povarov, D. E. Graf, A. Hauspurg, S. Zherlitsyn, J. Wosnitza, T. Sakurai, H. Ohta, S. Kimura, H. Nojiri, V. O. Garlea, A. Zheludev, A. Paduan-Filho, M. Nicklas, and S. A. Zvyagin, Pressure-tuned quantum criticality in the large-D antiferromagnetic DTN, Nature Communi- ca...

    2024

  59. [67]

    Vaidya et al ., Data for ”Single-ion anisotropy driven chiral magnetism in a Spin-1 antiferromagnetic chain” (2025), [URL to be inserted]

    S. Vaidya et al ., Data for ”Single-ion anisotropy driven chiral magnetism in a Spin-1 antiferromagnetic chain” (2025), [URL to be inserted]. Supplementary Material accompanying Single-ion anisotropy driven chiral magnetism in a Spin-1 antiferromagnetic chain S. Vaidya,1, ∗ S....

    2025

  60. [68]

    G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXT – Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination, Acta Crystallographica Section A 71, 3 (2015)

    2015

  61. [69]

    G. M. Sheldrick, Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL, Acta Crystallographica Section C 71, 3 (2015)

    2015

  62. [70]

    O. V. Dolomanov, L. J. Bourhis, R. J. Gildea, J. A. K. Howard, a nd H. Puschmann, OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program, Journal of Applied Crystallography 42, 339 (2009)

    2009

  63. [71]

    Bhattacharjee, S

    J. Bhattacharjee, S. Chakravarty, J. L. Richardson, and D. J. Sc alapino, Some properties of a one-dimensional ising chain with an inverse-square interaction, Phys. Rev. B 24, 3862 (1981)

    1981

  64. [72]

    Rodr ´ ıguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic struc ture determination by neutron powder diffraction, Physica B: Condensed Matter 192, 55 (1993)

    J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic struc ture determination by neutron powder diffraction, Physica B: Condensed Matter 192, 55 (1993)

    1993

  65. [73]

    L. C. Chapon, P. Manuel, P. G. Radaelli, C. Benson, L. Perrot t, S. Ansell, N. J. Rhodes, D. Raspino, D. Duxbury, E. Spill, et al. , WISH: The new powder and single crystal magnetic diffractomet er on the second target station, Neutron News 22, 22 (2011)

    2011

  66. [74]

    Bewley, J

    R. Bewley, J. Taylor, and S. Bennington., LET, a cold neutro n multi-disk chopper spectrometer at ISIS, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spect rometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 637, 128 (2011)

    2011

  67. [75]

    Toth and B

    S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single-Q inc ommensurate magnetic structures, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27, 166002 (2015)

    2015

  68. [76]

    Pianet, M

    V. Pianet, M. Urdampilleta, T. Colin, R. Cl´ erac, and C. Cou lon, Domain walls in single-chain magnets, Phys. Rev. B 96, 214429 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    Vaidya, S

    S. Vaidya, S. P. M. Curley, P. Manuel, J. R. Stewart, M. D. Le, C. Balz, T. Shiroka, S. J. Blundell, K. A. Wheeler, I. Calderon-Lin, Z. E. Manson, J. L. Manson, J. Singleton, T. L ancaster, R. D. Johnson, and P. A. Goddard, Magnetic properties of a staggered S = 1 chain with a...

    2025

  70. [78]

    Bezanson, A

    J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah, Jul ia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM review 59, 65 (2017)

    2017

  71. [79]

    Hannay and J

    J. Hannay and J. Nye, Fibonacci numerical integration on a sphere, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 37, 11591 (2004)

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.