Langlands parameters for Moy-Prasad types

Cheng-Chiang Tsai; Stephen DeBacker; Tsao-Hsien Chen

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 47 references

Langlands parameters for Moy-Prasad types

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a tamely ramified $p$-adic reductive group, the paper constructs a partial local Langlands correspondence: every irreducible representation of depth $r$ is assigned a $G^\vee$-conjugacy class of homomorphisms from $I_F^r$ to the dual…

desk verdict A genuinely new construction of restricted Langlands parameters for all rational depths in tame groups, with the positive-depth p=2 case resting on a to-appear result that should be resolved before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07780 v1 pith:R2JHW5N2 submitted 2025-09-09 math.RT

Tsao-Hsien Chen , Stephen DeBacker , Cheng-Chiang Tsai This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.RT MSC 20G2522E50

keywords p-adicreductivegroupsMoy-PrasadtypesdepthofrepresentationslocalLanglandscorrespondenceparametersDeligne-Lusztigtameramificationfiltration

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a partial local Langlands correspondence for tamely ramified $p$-adic reductive groups, organized by depth. The main result is that every irreducible smooth representation of depth $r$ gives rise, in a canonical way, to a $G^\vee$-conjugacy class of continuous homomorphisms from the $r$-th upper-numbering inertia subgroup $I_F^r$ to the dual group $G^\vee$. This class is a restricted depth-$r$ parameter, and the paper proves it has depth at most $r$, with equality whenever $r$ is rational with denominator prime to $p$. The value for a reader is that the construction extracts Galois-side data directly from the Moy-Prasad type occurring in a representation, without needing a full Langlands parameterization, and it comes with conjectures about how it must sit inside any complete local Langlands correspondence.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the depth-$r$ Deligne-Lusztig parameter: an equivalence class of pairs $(\alpha, Z)$ with $\alpha\in\overline{F}$ of valuation $r$ and $Z\in(\overline{\mathfrak{a}}^*//W)(\overline{k})$, where $\overline{\mathfrak{a}}^*$ is the dual of the Lie algebra of the reductive quotient of a maximal $F^t$-split torus and $W$ is the Weyl group. It is built from a Moy-Prasad type $(x,X)$ by scaling $X$ by $\alpha$ and using the bijection $(5)$ between $\overline{\mathfrak{a}}^*//W^E_{hx}$ and $\mathfrak{g}^*(E^u)_{hx=0}//G(E^u)_{hx=0}$ to land in the quotient variety; the paper proves independence of the auxiliary field and of the conjugating element. The second move is a bijection between these Deligne-Lusztig parameters and restricted depth-$r$ parameters, obtained by lifting $Z$ to a torus character via the Moy-Prasad isomorphism and applying local Langlands for tamely ramified tori. This two-step transfer is what makes the map from representations to parameters canonical.

What would settle it

Exhibit a residue-characteristic-2 group and a point $x\in B(G,F)$ for which the map $\overline{\mathfrak{a}}^*//W^E_{hx}\to\mathfrak{g}^*(E^u)_{hx=0}//G(E^u)_{hx=0}$ is not bijective on $\overline{k}$-points; the construction of $\iota_x(X)$ then fails, so Theorem 1 would not hold in that case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is a construction that assigns to each irreducible smooth representation $\pi$ of depth $r$ a restricted depth-$r$ Langlands parameter $\varphi_\pi\colon I_F^r\to G^\vee$, well defined up to $G^\vee$-conjugation. For positive depth the construction goes through an intermediate object, the depth-$r$ Deligne-Lusztig parameter, obtained from a nondegenerate Moy-Prasad type $(x,X)$ by transporting $X$ to the quotient $\overline{\mathfrak{a}}^*//W$ of a maximal torus; the paper proves this intermediate parameter depends only on the stable-associate class of the type. It then establishes a bijection between depth-$r$ Deligne-Lusztig parameters and restricted depth-$r$ parameters, which yields the map in Theorem 1. When $r\in\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}\cap\mathbb{Q}_{>0}$, the resulting parameter is nontrivial and has depth exactly $r$. The depth zero case is handled by a parallel construction using Deligne-Lusztig induction on the reductive quotient, giving a map from depth zero representations to restricted depth zero parameters. The paper also proves that its construction is compatible with a known local Langlands correspondence for semisimple supercuspidal representations under mild hypotheses.

Load-bearing premise

The construction depends on a claimed one-to-one matching between two algebraic varieties attached to the group; in residue characteristic 2, that matching is cited from a paper that has not yet appeared, so if the matching fails for some group, the paper's positive-depth map is not defined there.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every representation $\pi$ of depth $r$, the construction produces a well-defined restricted depth-$r$ parameter whose depth is at most $r$, so the Galois-side datum never overshoots the representation's depth.
When $r\in\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}\cap\mathbb{Q}_{>0}$, every parameter in the image has depth exactly $r$, so the partial correspondence is nontrivial at those depths rather than collapsing to depth zero.
The bijection between depth-$r$ Deligne-Lusztig parameters and restricted depth-$r$ parameters gives a complete description of the target set $RP_r$ in terms of torus quotients.
If Conjecture 47 is granted, then the restriction of any Langlands parameter for $\pi$ to $I_F^r$ is forced to be the constructed parameter; the paper proves the depth inequality and the converse conjecture follow from this.
Under the stated hypotheses on $p$ and $G$, the paper proves Conjecture 47 for the local Langlands correspondence constructed in [Kal19, Kal21] for semisimple supercuspidal representations.
The depth zero case produces a map $\mathrm{Irr}(G(F))_0\to RP_0$ via Deligne-Lusztig theory, and the paper records that the analogous conjecture is known for tamely ramified tori, for unipotent representations, and for the DeBacker-Reeder correspondence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the map $\mathrm{Irr}(G(F))_r\to RP_r$ is defined purely from Moy-Prasad types, it gives a finite, checkable inertia-restricted shadow of the local Langlands correspondence for any tame group, even where no full correspondence is known.
The nontriviality statement for $r\in\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ suggests a test for depth preservation: if a family of representations is known to have Langlands parameters of depth smaller than the representations' depth, then either the family escapes the tameness hypothesis or the additional assumptions in Conjecture 52 are necessary.
Once the residue-characteristic-2 bijection cited as [ST25] is available in full, the construction's range can be probed computationally for small groups such as $\mathrm{SL}_2$ over $\mathbb{Q}_2$; a computed $\varphi_\pi$ could be compared with the restriction of any known parameter to $I_F^r$, giving direct evidence for or against Conjecture 47.
The same Deligne-Lusztig parameter formalism could be adapted to define stable associates for arbitrary depth types, which may clarify when two Moy-Prasad types should be viewed as Langlands-equivalent even outside the tame setting.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Rough take: this is a real construction, not a repackaging. The authors build a map from depth-r irreducible representations of a tamely ramified p-adic group to restricted Langlands parameters on the r-th upper numbering inertia subgroup, for all rational r, and show that when r lies in Z_(p) it lands on nontrivial parameters. The depth-zero piece also subsumes DeBacker-Reeder, Kazhdan-Lusztig, and Lusztig. The rational-depth Deligne-Lusztig parameters in Section 4 and the bijection DL_r ≅ RP_r in Lemma 45 are new, and they handle r outside Z_(p) and non-split groups. The proofs are detailed; the main theorem follows from the stated lemmas.

The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the report: the positive-depth construction in residual characteristic 2 uses the map (5), which for p=2 is an inversion of a bijection from [ST25, Thm 1], cited as to appear. That is load-bearing: without it, i_{α,x}(X) is not defined, so Lemma 40, Lemma 45, and the p=2 part of Theorem 1 collapse. The paper also relies on [Spi21, Prop. 3.3] in Lemma 36 for p=2, but that preprint is available. I think the reader's concern is on target. The authors are not hiding it—they cite [ST25] as to appear—but the issue is real. The fix is straightforward: either make [ST25] available or restrict the unconditional positive-depth claim to p>2. Everything else I checked looks solid. I found no circularity or fitted parameters. The conjectures in Section 6 are clearly labeled as conjectures, and Lemma 58's evidence for Kaletha's correspondence is a genuine check, not a substitute for a proof. The paper also shows good judgment in remarks like Remark 14 (torus depth preservation failure) and Remark 55 (why a naive upgrade of Conjecture 49 fails).

Who should read this: anyone working on the local Langlands correspondence for tame groups, Moy-Prasad types, or depth-invariance. It deserves a serious referee. I would accept it for peer review and ask the authors to address the p=2 dependence before publication.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs, for a tamely ramified p-adic reductive group G, a canonical map from the set of irreducible smooth representations of depth r to G^∨-conjugacy classes of restricted depth-r Langlands parameters. For r>0, the construction first attaches to a nondegenerate Moy-Prasad type (x,X) a depth-r Deligne-Lusztig parameter in a quotient of the dual Lie algebra of a maximal torus (Section 4), and then identifies depth-r Deligne-Lusztig parameters bijectively with tame restricted depth-r parameters using local Langlands for tori (Section 5); the main positive-depth statement is Lemma 46. The depth-zero case is handled separately in Section 7 via Deligne-Lusztig parameters of parahoric quotients, giving Lemma 63. The paper also formulates Conjectures 47, 49, and 52 relating the construction to the full local Langlands correspondence, and proves Conjecture 47 for Kaletha's semisimple supercuspidal parameters under restrictive hypotheses (Lemma 58).

Significance. If correct, the paper gives an explicit, choice-independent assignment of restricted Langlands parameters to all irreducible representations of tame p-adic groups, at the exact depth of the representation, together with a nontriviality statement for p-integral depths. This is a substantial step toward an explicit local Langlands correspondence and should be of interest to the representation theory and automorphic forms communities. The paper is well structured, the positive-depth construction is reduced to two clearly identified steps, and the depth-zero construction is essentially self-contained. The main caveats are that the p=2 positive-depth case depends on an external 'to appear' result [ST25], and that one explanatory sentence around diagram (6) asserts a false inclusion; both need correction. The conjectures are precise and the verification in Lemma 58 gives useful evidence, though that proof is very compressed.

major comments (2)

[Section 4.1, diagram (6)] The sentence following diagram (6) states: 'The inclusion g^*(E')_{hx=-r}⊂a^*(E^u)_{-r} holds because G is E'-split.' This inclusion is false as written. For a split group and hx in the apartment of A, the Moy-Prasad quotient g^*(E')_{hx=-r} has dimension equal to dim G, whereas a^*(E^u)_{-r} has dimension equal to the rank of G; already for G=SL_2 the root spaces contribute to the filtration. The construction of i_{E,h,α,x} should not require this inclusion: one should map α Ad^*(h)Y to its G(E^u)_{hx=0}-orbit in g^*(E^u)_{hx=0}//G(E^u)_{hx=0} and then apply the inverse of the bijection (5). Since the definition of the depth-r Deligne-Lusztig parameter ι_x(X) rests on this step, the diagram and the surrounding explanation must be corrected.
[Section 4.1, Eq. (5)] For p=2, the bijection (5) is justified by [ST25, Thm. 1], which is cited as 'to appear' and is not independently checkable from this preprint. This dependence is load-bearing: the inverse of (5) enters the definition of i_{E,h,α,x}, hence of ι_x(X), Lemma 40, Lemma 45, and the positive-depth part of Theorem 1 for residual characteristic 2. The nontriviality assertion for r∈Z_(p) also passes through Lemma 45 and inherits the same dependence. Please either include a complete proof or a precise statement of [ST25, Thm. 1] in an appendix, or explicitly state Theorem 1 and the positive-depth lemmas only for p>2 (and for p=2 conditionally on [ST25]). As the manuscript stands, the p=2 case cannot be verified by a reader.

minor comments (4)

[Section 4.2.1, before Lemma 31] The transfer of [AD02, Theorem 3.1.2 and Corollary 3.2.6] from g(F) to g^*(F) is asserted via a remark in loc. cit.; since this transfer underpins Lemma 31 and hence Corollary 37, it would be helpful to add two or three sentences explaining why the arguments are purely lattice-theoretic.
[Section 6.3, Lemma 58] The proof of Lemma 58 is quite compressed, especially the assertion that in Kaletha's construction one has φ|_{I^{0+}_F}=(T^∨→G^∨)∘φ_θ|_{I^{0+}_F} up to G^∨-conjugacy. Please expand this step or give precise references to the relevant parts of [Kal19] and [Kal21], since Lemma 58 is the main evidence for Conjecture 47.
[Section 7.1] In the definition of DL_0, the Frobenius endomorphism is denoted F, which clashes with the base field F. Using a different symbol (for example Φ) for the Frobenius would remove a recurring ambiguity.
[Introduction] There are a few typographical issues: in the Introduction the notation 'res m_F Λ' should read 'res_{m_F} Λ', and in the display of Theorem 1 the condition 'Irr(G(F)) r̸=∅' should be 'Irr(G(F))_r≠∅'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the map from representations to restricted parameters is a genuine construction from external invariant-theoretic and torus-LLC inputs, with the p=2 branch depending on the to-appear [ST25] bijection as an unverified external support, not on a fitted or self-defined output.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. For positive depth, Theorem 1 is obtained by composing Corollary 37 (nondegenerate Moy-Prasad types give a depth-r Deligne-Lusztig parameter, using the Moy-Prasad occurrence theorem and the invariant-theoretic bijection (5)) with Lemma 45 (bijection between DL_r and RP_r via the torus local Langlands correspondence with depth preservation [Yu09]). Neither step defines its output in terms of the map being proved: (5) is an external Kac-Weisfeiler/Spice-Tsai bijection, and the torus LLC is an external theorem. The independence-of-choice lemmas (23, 24, 41) are proved in the paper. The nontriviality assertion for r in Z_(p) follows from Lemma 33 and Corollary 37, not from fitting a parameter to the target data. The self-citations to [CB24] in Remarks 28 and 38 are explicitly presented as special cases that this paper generalizes or reproves, so they are not load-bearing. The depth-zero map uses Deligne-Lusztig theory [DL76], [L07], and Borel's parametrization [B77] as external inputs. The genuine caveat is that for residual characteristic 2 the bijection (5) is justified by [ST25, Thm. 1], cited as 'to appear', and Lemma 36 additionally uses [Spi21, Prop. 3.3]. These are load-bearing but are not reductions of the present theorem to its own conjecture or to fitted values; if they failed, the p=2 positive-depth map would not be defined, which is a missing external support rather than a circular derivation. The score of 1 reflects these to-appear and minor self-citation dependencies, not actual circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces new mathematical objects, such as depth-r Deligne-Lusztig parameters and restricted depth-r parameters, but no new physical or external entities. No numbers are fitted to data. Auxiliary choices such as the additive character Λ_F and the depth-zero isomorphism ι are shown to cancel in Remarks 21, 48, and 64, so they are not free parameters in the central claim.

assumptions (6)

standard math The Kac-Weisfeiler map (5) ¯a^*//W^E_{hx} → g^*(E^u)_{hx=0}//G(E^u)_{hx=0} is a bijection on ¯k-points, by [KW76, Thm. 4] for p>2 and [ST25, Thm. 1] for p=2.
Used to define i_{E,α,x} in Section 4.1 and hence every depth-r Deligne-Lusztig parameter. The p=2 half is cited as to appear and is not independently verifiable from this preprint.
standard math Moy-Prasad logarithm log_E: G(E^u)_{x=r} ≅ g(E^u)_{x=r} exists for weakly induced tori, per [KP23, Theorem 13.5.1].
Establishes the character χ^T_{X,E} in Section 3.2 and the pairings in Section 1.1.2.
domain assumption The G-domain results [AD02, Theorem 3.1.2 and Corollary 3.2.6], stated for g, transfer to g^* as asserted in Section 4.2.1.
Lemma 31's equivalence (1)⇔(3) and Lemma 33's nondegeneracy criterion depend on this transfer.
standard math Local Langlands for tori preserves depth for tamely ramified tori, per [Yu09, §7.5 and §7.10].
Used in Section 3.2 to identify characters of T(E)_{=r-c} with homomorphisms I_F^r → T^∨, and in Lemma 45's surjectivity argument.
standard math The normalized trace, norm, and ramification facts in Lemmas 7-10, based on Serre [Ser79] and Weil [We95], are correct for the normalized upper numbering.
These lemmas underpin the existence of adapted extensions and the behavior of characters under field extension.
standard math Affine Bruhat-Tits fixed point theorems and conjugacy of apartments as used in Lemma 36, following [BT72], [Pra01], and [Rou77].
Needed for the associativity argument that makes the Deligne-Lusztig parameter of a representation well defined.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Langlands parameters for Moy-Prasad types." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R2JHW5N2

@misc{pith2026250907780,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Langlands parameters for Moy-Prasad types},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R2JHW5N2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07780}
}

abstract

Suppose $G$ is a tamely ramified $p$-adic reductive group. We construct a partial local Langlands correspondence between the set of irreducible smooth representations of $G$ having depth $r$ and a certain set of $G^\vee$-conjugacy classes of continuous homomorphisms $\varphi:I_F^r\rightarrow G^{\vee}$. Here $G^\vee$ is the dual group of $G$, and $I_F^r$ is the $r^{\text{th}}$ upper-numbering filtration subgroup of the inertia subgroup $I_F$.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

[1]

J. D. Adler and S. DeBacker, Some applications of Bruhat-Tits theory to harmonic analysis on the Lie algebra of a reductive p -adic group, Michigan Math. J. 50(2002), no. 2, pp. 263–286

work page 2002
[2]

Reine Angew

, Murnaghan- K irillov theory for supercuspidal representations of tame general linear groups , J. Reine Angew. Math. , 575(2004), pp. 1--35

work page 2004
[3]

A. M. Aubert, P. Baum, R. Plymen, and M. Solleveld, Depth and the local L anglands correspondence , Arbeitstagung B onn 2013, Progr. Math., vol. 319, Birkh\"auser/Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 17--41

work page 2013
[4]

A. M. Aubert, S. Mendes, R. Plymen, and M. Solleveld, On L -packets and depth for SL _2(K) and its inner form , Int. J. Number Theory , 13(2017) no. 10, pp. 2545--2568

work page 2017
[5]

A. M. Aubert and R. Plymen, On depth in the local Langlands correspondence for tori, 2018, https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08046

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[6]

Number Theory , 233(2022), pp

, Comparison of the depths on both sides of the local L anglands correspondence for W eil-restricted groups , with an appendix by Jessica Fintzen , J. Number Theory , 233(2022), pp. 24--58

work page 2022
[7]

Borel, Automorphic L -functions , in Automorphic forms, representations and L -functions ( P roc

A. Borel, Automorphic L -functions , in Automorphic forms, representations and L -functions ( P roc. S ympos. P ure M ath., O regon S tate U niv., C orvallis, O re., 1977), P art 2 , Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , XXXIII , Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI , 1979 , pp. 27--61

work page 1977
[8]

Borel and J.-P

A. Borel and J.-P. Serre, Sur certains sous-groupes des groupes de L ie compacts , Comment. Math. Helv. 27(1953), 128--139

work page 1953

Show all 47 references

[9]

Bruhat and J

F. Bruhat and J. Tits, Groupes r\'eductifs sur un corps local. I . Donn\'ees radicielles valu\'ees , Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. (1972), no. 41, pp. 5-251

1972
[10]

J. W. S. Cassels and A. Fr\"ohlich (eds.), Algebraic number theory, Proceedings of an instructional conference organized by the L ondon M athematical S ociety (a NATO A dvanced S tudy I nstitute) with the support of the I nternational M athematical U nion , Academic Press, Lon...

1967
[11]

Chen and S

T.-H. Chen and S. Bhattacharya, A description of the integral depth- r Bernstein center, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15128v1

2024
[12]

DeBacker, Parameterizing conjugacy classes of maximal unramified tori via B ruhat- T its theory , Michigan Math

S. DeBacker, Parameterizing conjugacy classes of maximal unramified tori via B ruhat- T its theory , Michigan Math. J. , 54(2006) no. 1, pp. 157--178

2006
[13]

, Some applications of Bruhat-Tits theory to harmonic analysis on a reductive p -adic group, Michigan Math. J. , 50(2002) no. 2, pp. 241-261

2002
[14]

, Totally ramified maximal tori and Bruhat-Tits theory, 14 September, 2024, http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09049

2024 arXiv
[15]

DeBacker and M

S. DeBacker and M. Reeder, Depth-zero supercuspidal L-packets and their stability, Ann. of Math. (2) 169(2009), no. 3, pp. 795–901

2009
[16]

DeBacker, D

S. DeBacker, D. Schwein, and C.-C. Tsai, Normalized indexing for ramification subgroups, to appear
[17]

Deligne and G

P. Deligne and G. Lusztig, Representations of reductive groups over finite fields, Ann. of Math. (2) 103(1976), no. 1, pp. 103--161

1976
[18]

Fintzen, Types for tame p -adic groups , Ann

J. Fintzen, Types for tame p -adic groups , Ann. of Math. (2) 193(2021), no. 1, pp. 303--346

2021
[19]

Ganapathy, The local L anglands correspondence for GSp_4 over local function fields , Amer

R. Ganapathy, The local L anglands correspondence for GSp_4 over local function fields , Amer. J. Math. , 137( 2015 ) no. 6, pp. 1441--1534

2015
[20]

Ganapathy and S

R. Ganapathy and S. Varma, On the local L anglands correspondence for split classical groups over local function fields , J. Inst. Math. Jussieu , 16(2017) no. 5, pp. 987--1074

2017
[21]

Hakim and F

J. Hakim and F. Murnaghan, Distinguished tame supercuspidal representations, Int. Math. Res. Pap. IMRP (2008), no. 2, Art. ID rpn005, 166

2008
[22]

Kac and B

V. Kac and B. Weisfeiler, Coadjoint action of a semi-simple algebraic group and the center of the enveloping algebra in characteristic p , Indag. Math. 38(1976), no. 2, 136--151, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 79

1976
[23]

Kaletha, Regular supercuspidal representations, J

T. Kaletha, Regular supercuspidal representations, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 32(2019), no. 4, pp. 1071--1170

2019
[24]

, Supercuspidal L-packets, 2021, https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03274v2

2021 arXiv
[25]

Kaletha and G

T. Kaletha and G. Prasad, Bruhat- T its theory---a new approach , New Mathematical Monographs, vol. 44, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023

2023
[26]

Kazhdan and G

D. Kazhdan and G. Lusztig. Proof of the Deligne-Langlands conjecture for Hecke algebras Invent. Math. 87(1987), no. 1, pp. 153–215

1987
[27]

Levy, Vinberg's -groups in positive characteristic and K ostant- W eierstrass slices , Transform

P. Levy, Vinberg's -groups in positive characteristic and K ostant- W eierstrass slices , Transform. Groups 14(2009), no. 2, pp. 417--461

2009
[28]

Lusztig, Classification of unipotent representations of simple p-adic groups, Int

G. Lusztig, Classification of unipotent representations of simple p-adic groups, Int. Math. Res. Notices 11(1995), pp. 517–589

1995
[29]

Papers from the 4th International Conference (ICRT-IV) held in Lhasa, July 16–20, 2007

, Twelve bridges from a reductive group to its Langlands dual, Representation theory. Papers from the 4th International Conference (ICRT-IV) held in Lhasa, July 16–20, 2007. Edited by Zongzhu Lin and Jianpan Wang Contemp. Math., 478 American Mathematical Society, Providence, R...

2007
[30]

Mishra and B

M. Mishra and B. Pattanayak, A note on depth preservation, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. , 34(2019), no. 4, pp. 393--400

2019
[31]

Moy and G

A. Moy and G. Prasad, Unrefined minimal K -types for p -adic groups , Invent. Math. 116(1994), no. 1-3, pp. 393--408

1994
[32]

, Jacquet functors and unrefined minimal K -types , Comment. Math. Helv. 71(1996), no. 1, pp. 98--121

1996
[33]

Oi, Depth preserving property of the local L anglands correspondence for non-quasi-split unitary groups , Math

M. Oi, Depth preserving property of the local L anglands correspondence for non-quasi-split unitary groups , Math. Res. Lett. , 28(2021) no. 1, pp. 175--211

2021
[34]

, 171(2023), no.3-4, pp

, Depth-preserving property of the local L anglands correspondence for quasi-split classical groups in large residual characteristic , Manuscripta Math. , 171(2023), no.3-4, pp. 529--562

2023
[35]

Prasad, A new approach to unramified descent in Bruhat-Tits theory, Amer.\ J

G. Prasad, A new approach to unramified descent in Bruhat-Tits theory, Amer.\ J. Math., 142(2020), no.\ 1, pp. 215--253

2020
[36]

, Galois-fixed points in the B ruhat- T its building of a reductive group , Bull. Soc. Math. France 129(2001), no. 2, pp. 169--174

2001
[37]

Reeder and J.-K

M. Reeder and J.-K. Yu, Epipelagic representations and invariant theory, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 27(2014), no. 2, pp. 437--477

2014
[38]

Rousseau, Immeubles des groupes r\'educitifs sur les corps locaux, Publications Math\'ematiques d'Orsay [Mathematical Publications of Orsay], vol

G. Rousseau, Immeubles des groupes r\'educitifs sur les corps locaux, Publications Math\'ematiques d'Orsay [Mathematical Publications of Orsay], vol. No. 221-77.68, Universit\'e Paris XI, U.E.R. Math\'ematique, Orsay, 1977, Th\`ese de doctorat

1977
[39]

Serre, Local fields, Graduate Texts in Mathematics , vol

J.-P. Serre, Local fields, Graduate Texts in Mathematics , vol. 67 , Translated from the French by M.J. Greenberg , Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin , 1979

1979
[40]

Solleveld and Y

M. Solleveld and Y. Xu, On depth-zero characters of p-adic groups, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.01505

2025 doi arXiv
[41]

Spice, Explicit asymptotic expansions in p-adic harmonic analysis ii, 2021, https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12935v3

L. Spice, Explicit asymptotic expansions in p-adic harmonic analysis ii, 2021, https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12935v3

2021
[42]

Spice and C.-C

L. Spice and C.-C. Tsai, Jordan decompositions in Lie algebras and their duals, to appear
[43]

T. A. Springer and R. Steinberg, Conjugacy classes, Seminar on A lgebraic G roups and R elated F inite G roups ( T he I nstitute for A dvanced S tudy, P rinceton, N . J ., 1968/69), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 131, Springer, Berlin, 1970, pp. 167--266

1968
[44]

Weil, Basic number theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin , 1995

A. Weil, Basic number theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin , 1995

1995
[45]

Yu, Construction of tame supercuspidal representations, J

J.-K. Yu, Construction of tame supercuspidal representations, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14(2001), no. 3, pp. 579--622 (electronic)

2001
[46]

Monogr., vol

, On the local L anglands correspondence for tori , Ottawa lectures on admissible representations of reductive p -adic groups, Fields Inst. Monogr., vol. 26, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2009, pp. 177--183

2009
[47]

, Smooth models associated to concave functions in B ruhat- T its theory , Autour des sch\'emas en groupes. V ol. III , Panor. Synth\`eses, vol. 47, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 2015, pp. 227--258

2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

J. D. Adler and S. DeBacker, Some applications of Bruhat-Tits theory to harmonic analysis on the Lie algebra of a reductive p -adic group, Michigan Math. J. 50(2002), no. 2, pp. 263–286

work page 2002

[2] [2]

Reine Angew

, Murnaghan- K irillov theory for supercuspidal representations of tame general linear groups , J. Reine Angew. Math. , 575(2004), pp. 1--35

work page 2004

[3] [3]

A. M. Aubert, P. Baum, R. Plymen, and M. Solleveld, Depth and the local L anglands correspondence , Arbeitstagung B onn 2013, Progr. Math., vol. 319, Birkh\"auser/Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 17--41

work page 2013

[4] [4]

A. M. Aubert, S. Mendes, R. Plymen, and M. Solleveld, On L -packets and depth for SL _2(K) and its inner form , Int. J. Number Theory , 13(2017) no. 10, pp. 2545--2568

work page 2017

[5] [5]

A. M. Aubert and R. Plymen, On depth in the local Langlands correspondence for tori, 2018, https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08046

work page Pith review arXiv 2018

[6] [6]

Number Theory , 233(2022), pp

, Comparison of the depths on both sides of the local L anglands correspondence for W eil-restricted groups , with an appendix by Jessica Fintzen , J. Number Theory , 233(2022), pp. 24--58

work page 2022

[7] [7]

Borel, Automorphic L -functions , in Automorphic forms, representations and L -functions ( P roc

A. Borel, Automorphic L -functions , in Automorphic forms, representations and L -functions ( P roc. S ympos. P ure M ath., O regon S tate U niv., C orvallis, O re., 1977), P art 2 , Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , XXXIII , Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI , 1979 , pp. 27--61

work page 1977

[8] [8]

Borel and J.-P

A. Borel and J.-P. Serre, Sur certains sous-groupes des groupes de L ie compacts , Comment. Math. Helv. 27(1953), 128--139

work page 1953