pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.07833 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-09 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

A framework for continuous superradiant laser operation via sequential transport of atoms

Jana El Badawi , Marion Delehaye , Bruno Bellomo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords superradiant lasercontinuous operationatomic synchronizationytterbium atomsFabry-Perot cavitynarrow linewidthoptical metrologyopen quantum systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Synchronization of two atomic ensembles in a shared cavity produces a single narrow superradiant line at their weighted average frequency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a theoretical framework for continuous superradiant laser operation using two ensembles of ytterbium atoms that emit sequentially into the same Fabry-Perot cavity. It identifies parameter regimes yielding tens of picowatts of power with sub-millihertz linewidth and shows that the output remains robust against frequency broadening and coupling variations. In the two-site model with different detunings between ensembles, dipole synchronization collapses the spectrum to one narrow line whose center tracks the atom-number-weighted average frequency. This points to a route for uninterrupted superradiant emission in metrological settings, provided relative frequencies between ensembles are controlled at the required level. A reader would care because continuous narrow-line sources can reduce dead time in precision measurements such as optical clocks.

Core claim

In the two-site configuration, atoms within each ensemble share identical detunings and equal cavity couplings while the ensembles differ only in their common detuning value. Synchronization of the atomic dipoles then produces a single narrow spectral line whose central frequency equals the weighted average of the two ensemble frequencies, and this holds for both balanced and imbalanced atom numbers inside an identified parameter space.

What carries the argument

Synchronization of atomic dipoles across the two ensembles, which forces the combined system to emit at a single frequency given by the weighted average of the two detunings.

If this is right

  • The laser reaches tens of picowatts output power together with sub-millihertz linewidth under the identified operating parameters.
  • Superradiant emission stays robust against inhomogeneous frequency broadening and atom-cavity coupling variations because of dipole synchronization.
  • Sequential loading of the two ensembles supports continuous superradiant emission suitable for metrology when the relative frequencies are controlled to the target stability.
  • A single narrow line appears for both balanced and imbalanced atom numbers between the two ensembles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same synchronization could extend to three or more ensembles, enabling arbitrarily long continuous cycles by rotating through additional sites.
  • The weighted-average frequency might itself become a stable reference point if the relative atom numbers are monitored in real time.
  • An experiment could test the claim by fixing the population imbalance and scanning the detuning offset while recording whether the linewidth remains sub-millihertz.
  • Continuous operation of this kind would directly cut dead time in optical-frequency standards that currently rely on intermittent interrogation.

Load-bearing premise

Atoms inside each ensemble share the same detuning and the same coupling strength to the cavity, with the two ensembles differing only in their common detuning value.

What would settle it

Measure the emitted spectrum while varying the detuning difference between the two ensembles; if two distinct lines appear instead of one merged line at the weighted-average frequency, the synchronization result is falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07833 by Bruno Bellomo, Jana El Badawi, Marion Delehaye.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scheme of the experiment at FEMTO-ST. Black dots: atoms. Yellow lattice: cavity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Steady-state solutions of Eqs. (1) as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Number of intracavity photons at the steady-state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Intracavity photon number ⟨a †a⟩ st and output power P (a, c) and linewidth ∆ν (b, d) both as a function of atom number N and repumping rate R. (a-b): Collective dynamics with N atoms coupled to a single cavity mode. Red dashed line: minimum repumping rate Rmin = γ for superradiant emission onset; red dot-dashed line: maximum repumping rate Rmax = NCγ above which superradiance is suppressed; light blue dot… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cavity spectra for N = 2 × 104 atoms, σ = 2π × 1 Hz standard deviation, and R = 2π × 0.01 Hz, for various values of the number of classes M. An atomic ensemble composed of M discrete frequency classes, each characterized by a detuning ∆m, m = 1,...M, spaced uniformly over a given frequency interval, is considered in 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cavity spectra for M = 25 classes, N = 2 × 104 atoms, and σ = 2π × 1 Hz, for several values of R. cavity mode wave number [33]. The atoms are divided equally into K strength classes, where each class corresponds to a value of g(x) obtained from a uniform distribution of positions in the interval x ∈ [0, ..., λ/4). Since the dynamics of the system only depends on the magnitude of the coupling strength, we l… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: For several total atom numbers we have, (a) number of intracavity photons at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Normalized cavity field spectrum in the case of two atomic ensembles at site [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: For several total atom numbers N = NA + NB and NA = NB we have, (a) number of intracavity photons at the steady state ⟨a †a⟩ st and output power P, (b) and linewidth of the cavity field spectrum ∆ν as a function R. Solid lines correspond to the reference of one-class case which corresponds to ∆νm = 0 and g = 2π × 3.8 Hz. Squares correspond to the M = 2 classes case with ∆ = 2π × 0.1 Hz: full squares corres… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Central frequency of the spectrum as a function of the atom number ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Number of intracavity photons at the steady-state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Atomic variables as a function of N for R = 104γ, for γ = 2π × 7 mHz, κ = 2π × 400 kHz, T −1 2 = 1 rad.s −1 , g = 2π × 3.8 Hz, ∆ = 0, and ξ = 0. In Fig.12, we show for the case ∆ = ξ = 0, the steady-state variables which involve the atoms, ⟨σ z ⟩ st , ⟨σ + i σ − j ⟩ st, and I h ⟨aσ+⟩ sti (the real part is zero for ∆ = 0) as a function of N for R = 104γ. This is compared with both the large κ and R express… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform a theoretical study of a continuous superradiant laser supporting its experimental realization at FEMTO-ST using two sequentially-emitting ensembles of ${}^{171}\mathrm{Yb}$ atoms coupled to the same Fabry-Perot cavity. Using an open quantum system approach, we identify for the simplest case the parameter space where the laser reaches tens of picowatts of power with a sub-millihertz linewidth. Studying the impact of inhomogeneous frequency broadening and variations in atom-cavity coupling on the superradiant emission, we find the laser properties robust with respect to such perturbations, also thanks to the occurrence of synchronization of the atomic dipoles. We then consider a two-site configuration, in which atoms in each site are equally coupled to the cavity and have equal detunings, with different values for the two ensembles. We find for balanced and imbalanced atom numbers that synchronization leads in a certain parameter space to a single narrow spectral line whose central frequency follows the weighted average frequency. This result indicates that sequential loading can enable continuous superradiant emission for metrological applications, provided that the relative frequencies of the two ensembles are controlled to the level required by the target stability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to provide a theoretical framework for continuous superradiant laser operation using sequential transport of two ensembles of 171Yb atoms into a Fabry-Perot cavity. Using open quantum system modeling, it identifies parameters for tens of picowatts power and sub-millihertz linewidth. It shows robustness to inhomogeneous broadening and coupling variations due to synchronization. In the two-site model with equal intra-ensemble detunings and couplings (differing between ensembles), synchronization produces a single narrow spectral line at the weighted average frequency for balanced and imbalanced atom numbers, suggesting viability for metrological applications with appropriate frequency control.

Significance. If valid, this work could enable practical continuous superradiant lasers for precision metrology by demonstrating a synchronization mechanism that produces narrow linewidths and robustness to perturbations. The numerical solutions of the open-system equations offer concrete predictions. The finding that the central frequency follows the weighted average under synchronization is particularly useful. However, the idealized assumptions in the two-site model require further scrutiny for the robustness claims to fully support the central conclusions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Two-site configuration section] The central claim that synchronization leads to a single narrow spectral line whose central frequency follows the weighted average frequency for balanced and imbalanced atom numbers rests on the premise that atoms within each ensemble have identical detunings and equal coupling strengths to the cavity (stated for the two-site configuration). The robustness to inhomogeneous frequency broadening and variations in atom-cavity coupling is reported thanks to synchronization, but it is unclear if these checks were performed inside the two-ensemble synchronization dynamics or only for single-ensemble cases. This is load-bearing for the claim, as small intra-ensemble spreads might disrupt the locking, causing deviation from the weighted average or spectral splitting.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'tens of picowatts' and 'sub-millihertz linewidth' without specifying exact parameter values or ranges (e.g., atom numbers or relative detuning); adding a brief indication would improve the summary.
  2. [Main text] Notation for the weighted-average frequency could be defined more explicitly when first introduced to avoid any ambiguity in the synchronization result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive feedback. We address the major comment point by point below. We agree that additional clarification and explicit checks are warranted to strengthen the robustness claims in the two-ensemble setting.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Two-site configuration section] The central claim that synchronization leads to a single narrow spectral line whose central frequency follows the weighted average frequency for balanced and imbalanced atom numbers rests on the premise that atoms within each ensemble have identical detunings and equal coupling strengths to the cavity (stated for the two-site configuration). The robustness to inhomogeneous frequency broadening and variations in atom-cavity coupling is reported thanks to synchronization, but it is unclear if these checks were performed inside the two-ensemble synchronization dynamics or only for single-ensemble cases. This is load-bearing for the claim, as small intra-ensemble spreads might disrupt the locking, causing deviation from the weighted average or spectral splitting.

    Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this important clarification needed. The robustness analysis to inhomogeneous broadening and coupling variations (Section on impact of perturbations) was performed in the presence of synchronization for the superradiant regime, prior to introducing the two-site model. The two-site configuration then isolates the inter-ensemble synchronization by assuming identical intra-ensemble detunings and couplings, as explicitly stated. However, we acknowledge that explicit verification of small intra-ensemble spreads within the full two-ensemble dynamics was not included. To address this, we will add new numerical results in the revised manuscript demonstrating that modest intra-ensemble detuning spreads (up to a few Hz) and coupling variations preserve the single narrow line and weighted-average frequency locking for both balanced and imbalanced atom numbers. These will be presented as an extension of the two-site section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from open-system dynamics

full rationale

The paper derives its central claims on synchronization yielding a single narrow line whose frequency follows the weighted average by solving the open quantum system equations for the two-site model. The equal intra-ensemble detunings and couplings are explicit modeling assumptions required for the setup, not outputs redefined as inputs. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or ansatz smuggled from prior work; the weighted-average match is an observed outcome of the dynamics rather than a definitional tautology. The derivation remains self-contained against the stated model and numerical/analytic solutions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard open-quantum-system master equations for atom-cavity interaction plus several numerical parameters (atom numbers, detunings, coupling strengths, inhomogeneous broadening widths) that are chosen or scanned to match the target 171Yb system; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • atom numbers per ensemble
    Chosen to explore balanced and imbalanced cases; directly affect the synchronization threshold and output power.
  • relative detuning between ensembles
    Scanned to identify the parameter space where a single weighted-average line appears.
  • inhomogeneous broadening width
    Introduced to test robustness; values are varied but not derived from first principles.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Atoms within each ensemble share identical detuning and coupling strength to the cavity.
    Explicitly stated for the two-site configuration; required for the synchronization result to collapse to a single line.
  • standard math Open quantum system dynamics governed by a standard Lindblad master equation for collective atom-cavity coupling.
    Invoked throughout the theoretical study without derivation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5741 in / 1535 out tokens · 33766 ms · 2026-05-18T18:07:47.067849+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Safronova

    Marianna S. Safronova. The search for variation of fundamental constants with clocks. Annalen der Physik, 531(5):1800364, jan 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Exploring potential applications of optical lattice clocks in a plate subduction zone.Journal of Geodesy, 95(93):93, 2021

    Yoshiyuki Tanaka and Hidetoshi Katori. Exploring potential applications of optical lattice clocks in a plate subduction zone.Journal of Geodesy, 95(93):93, 2021. 26

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    D. G. Matei, T. Legero, S. Häfner, C. Grebing, R. Weyrich, W. Zhang, L. Sonderhouse, J. M. Robinson, J. Ye, F. Riehle, and U. Sterr. 1.5µm lasers with sub 10 mHz linewidth. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(26):263202, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Oelker, R

    E. Oelker, R. B. Hutson, C. J. Kennedy, L. Sonderhouse, T. Bothwell, A. Goban, D. Kedar, C. Sanner, J. M. Robinson, G. E. Marti, D. G. Matei, T. Legero, M. Giunta, R. Holzwarth, F. Riehle, U. Sterr, and J. Ye. Demonstration of4.8×10−17stability at 1 s for two independent optical clocks.Nat. Photonics, 13(10):714–719, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Kennedy, Alexander Aeppli, Dhruv Kedar, John M

    Tobias Bothwell, Colin J. Kennedy, Alexander Aeppli, Dhruv Kedar, John M. Robinson, Eric Oelker, Alexander Staron, and Jun Ye. Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-scale atomic sample.Nature, 602(420):420 – 424, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Safronova, and Jun Ye

    Alexander Aeppli, Kyungtae Kim, William Warfield, Marianna S. Safronova, and Jun Ye. Clock with8×10−19systematic uncertainty.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:023401, Jul 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    H.N.Hausser, J.Keller, T.Nordmann, N.M.Bhatt, J.Kiethe, H.Liu, I.M.Richter, M.von Boehn, J. Rahm, S. Weyers, E. Benkler, B. Lipphardt, S. Dörscher, K. Stahl, J. Klose, C. Lisdat, M. Filzinger, N. Huntemann, E. Peik, and T. E. Mehlstäubler.115In+−172Yb+ coulomb crystal clock with2.5×10−18systematic uncertainty.Phys.Rev. Lett., 134:023201, Jan 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Kolkowitz, I

    S. Kolkowitz, I. Pikovski, N. Langellier, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth, and J. Ye. Grav- itational wave detection with optical lattice atomic clocks.Phys. Rev. D, 94:124043, Dec 2016

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Atomic clocks and dark-matter signatures

    Andrei Derevianko. Atomic clocks and dark-matter signatures. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 723(012043):012043, 2016

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Filzinger, S

    M. Filzinger, S. Dörscher, R. Lange, J. Klose, M. Steinel, E. Benkler, E. Peik, C. Lisdat, and N. Huntemann. Improved limits on the coupling of ultralight bosonic dark matter to photons from optical atomic clock comparisons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 130:253001, Jun 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Thorpe, Lars Rippe, Tara M

    Michael J. Thorpe, Lars Rippe, Tara M. Fortier, Matthew S. Kirchner, and Till Rosen- band. Frequency stabilization to6×10−16via spectral-hole burning.Nature Photonics, 5(11):688–693, sep 2011

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Fox, Tara M

    Judith Olson, Richard W. Fox, Tara M. Fortier, Todd F. Sheerin, Roger C. Brown, Holly Leopardi, Richard E. Stoner, Chris W. Oates, and Andrew D. Ludlow. Ramsey-bordé matter-wave interferometry for laser frequency stabilization at10−16frequency instability and below. Physical Review Letters, 123(7):073202, aug 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Meiser, Jun Ye, D

    D. Meiser, Jun Ye, D. R. Carlson, and M. J. Holland. Prospects for a millihertz-linewidth laser. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:163601, Apr 2009

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    R. H. Dicke. The effect of collisions upon the Doppler width of spectral lines.Phys. Rev., 89:472–473, Jan 1953

    work page 1953

  15. [15]

    Gross and S

    M. Gross and S. Haroche. Superradiance: an essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission. Physics Reports, 93(5):301–391, 1982. 27

    work page 1982

  16. [16]

    Kolobov, Claude Fabre, Elisabeth Giacobino, and Serge Reynaud

    Fritz Haake, Mikhail I. Kolobov, Claude Fabre, Elisabeth Giacobino, and Serge Reynaud. Superradiant laser. Phys. Rev. Lett., 71(995):995–998, 1993

    work page 1993

  17. [17]

    Bohnet, Zilong Chen, Joshua M

    Justin G. Bohnet, Zilong Chen, Joshua M. Weiner, Dominic Meiser, Murray J. Holland, and James K. Thompson. A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon. Nature, 484(7392):78–81, 2012

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Norcia and James K

    Matthew A. Norcia and James K. Thompson. Cold-strontium laser in the superradiant crossover regime.Phys. Rev. X, 6(1):011025, 2016

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Norcia, Matthew N

    Matthew A. Norcia, Matthew N. Winchester, Julia R. K. Cline, and James K. Thomp- son. Superradiance on the millihertz linewidth strontium clock transition. Sci. Adv., 2(10):e1601231, 2016

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Norcia, Julia R

    Matthew A. Norcia, Julia R. K. Cline, Juan A. Muniz, John M. Robinson, Ross B. Hutson, Akihisa Goban, G. Edward Marti, Jun Ye, and James K. Thompson. Frequency measure- ments of superradiance from the strontium clock transition.Phys. Rev. X, 8(2):021036, 2018

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Pulse delay time statistics in a superradiant laser with calcium atoms.Phys

    Torben Laske, Hannes Winter, and Andreas Hemmerich. Pulse delay time statistics in a superradiant laser with calcium atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(10):103601, 2019

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Thomsen, and Jörg Helge Müller

    Sofus Laguna Kristensen, Eliot Bohr, Julian Robinson-Tait, Tanya Zelevinsky, Jan W. Thomsen, and Jörg Helge Müller. Subnatural linewidth superradiant lasing with cold88Sr atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett., 130:223402, May 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Bohr, Sofus L

    Eliot A. Bohr, Sofus L. Kristensen, Christoph Hotter, Stefan A. Schäffer, Julian Robinson- Tait, Jan W. Thomsen, Tanya Zelevinsky, Helmut Ritsch, and Jörg H. Müller. Col- lectively enhanced Ramsey readout by cavity sub- to superradiant transition. Nature Communications, 15(1):1084, feb 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Meiser and M

    D. Meiser and M. J. Holland. Steady-state superradiance with alkaline-earth-metal atoms. Phys. Rev. A, 81:033847, Mar 2010

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    G. A. Kazakov and T. Schumm. Active optical frequency standard using sequential coupling of atomic ensembles.Phys. Rev. A, 87:013821, Jan 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Continuous multi-step pumping of the optical clock transition in alkaline-earth atoms with minimal perturbation

    Christoph Hotter, David Plankensteiner, Georgy Kazakov, and Helmut Ritsch. Continuous multi-step pumping of the optical clock transition in alkaline-earth atoms with minimal perturbation. Optics Express, 30(4):5553, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Kazakov, Benedikt Heizenreder, Sheng Zhou, Shayne Ben- netts, Stefan Alaric Schäffer, Ananya Sitaram, and Florian Schreck

    Swadheen Dubey, Georgy A. Kazakov, Benedikt Heizenreder, Sheng Zhou, Shayne Ben- netts, Stefan Alaric Schäffer, Ananya Sitaram, and Florian Schreck. Modeling of a continu- ous superradiant laser on the sub-mHz1S0→3P0 transition in neutral strontium-88.Phys. Rev. Res., 7:013292, Mar 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Kazakov, Swadheen Dubey, Anna Bychek, Uwe Sterr, Marcin Bober, and Michał Zawada

    Georgy A. Kazakov, Swadheen Dubey, Anna Bychek, Uwe Sterr, Marcin Bober, and Michał Zawada. Ultimate stability of active optical frequency standards.Phys.Rev. A, 106:053114, Nov 2022. 28

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Jäger, Xianquan Yu, Steven Touzard, Athreya Shankar, Murray J

    Haonan Liu, Simon B. Jäger, Xianquan Yu, Steven Touzard, Athreya Shankar, Murray J. Holland, and Travis L. Nicholson. Rugged mHz-linewidth superradiant laser driven by a hot atomic beam.Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:253602, Dec 2020

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Schäffer, and Jörg H

    Mikkel Tang, Stefan A. Schäffer, and Jörg H. Müller. Prospects of a superradiant laser based on a thermal or guided beam of88Sr. Phys. Rev. A, 106:063704, Dec 2022

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Correlations and linewidth of the atomic beam continuous superradiant laser

    Bruno Laburthe-Tolra, Ziyad Amodjee, Benjamin Pasquiou, and Martin Robert de Saint- Vincent. Correlations and linewidth of the atomic beam continuous superradiant laser. SciPost Phys. Core, 6:015, 2023

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Thresholdless coherence in a superradiant laser.Light: Science & Applications, 13(1):239, sep 2024

    Seung-Hoon Oh, Jinuk Kim, Junseo Ha, Gibeom Son, and Kyungwon An. Thresholdless coherence in a superradiant laser.Light: Science & Applications, 13(1):239, sep 2024

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Superradiant lasing in inhomogeneously broadened ensembles with spatially varying coupling

    Anna Bychek, Christoph Hotter, David Plankensteiner, and Helmut Ritsch. Superradiant lasing in inhomogeneously broadened ensembles with spatially varying coupling. Open Research Europe, 1:73, sep 2021

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Minghui Xu, D. A. Tieri, E. C. Fine, James K. Thompson, and M. J. Holland. Synchro- nization of two ensembles of atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:154101, Oct 2014

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Oxford University Press, 01 2007

    Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione.The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, 01 2007

    work page 2007

  36. [36]

    Markovian master equations: a critical study.New Journal of Physics, 12(11):113032, nov 2010

    Ángel Rivas, A Douglas K Plato, Susana F Huelga, and Martin B Plenio. Markovian master equations: a critical study.New Journal of Physics, 12(11):113032, nov 2010

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Microscopic and phenomenological models of driven systems in structured reservoirs

    Gian Luca Giorgi, Astghik Saharyan, Stéphane Guérin, Dominique Sugny, and Bruno Bel- lomo. Microscopic and phenomenological models of driven systems in structured reservoirs. Phys. Rev. A, 101:012122, Jan 2020

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Bonifacio, P

    R. Bonifacio, P. Schwendimann, and Fritz Haake. Quantum statistical theory of superra- diance. i. Phys. Rev. A, 4:302–313, Jul 1971

    work page 1971

  39. [39]

    Boyd, Tanya Zelevinsky, Andrew D

    Martin M. Boyd, Tanya Zelevinsky, Andrew D. Ludlow, Seth M. Foreman, Sebastian Blatt, Tetsuya Ido, and Jun Ye. Optical atomic coherence at the 1-second time scale.Science, 314(5804):1430–1433, 2006

    work page 2006

  40. [40]

    Generalized cumulant expansion method.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 17(7):1100–1120, 1962

    Ryogo Kubo. Generalized cumulant expansion method.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 17(7):1100–1120, 1962

    work page 1962

  41. [41]

    PhD thesis, Technische Universität Wien, 2025

    Swadheen Dubey.Quantitativemodeling towardscontinuoussuperradiant laser on Sr. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Wien, 2025

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    R. R. Puri. Mathematical Methods of Quantum Optics, volume 79 ofSpringer Series in Optical Sciences. Springer, 2001

    work page 2001

  43. [43]

    Meiser and M

    D. Meiser and M. J. Holland. Intensity fluctuations in steady-state superradiance.Phys. Rev. A, 81:063827, Jun 2010

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Coherent single-atom super- radiance

    Junki Kim, Daeho Yang, Seung hoon Oh, and Kyungwon An. Coherent single-atom super- radiance. Science, 359(6376):662–666, 2018. 29

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    D. Tieri. Open Quantum Systems with Applications to Precision Measurements. PhD thesis, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, 2015-12 2015. 30

    work page 2015