Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 59 references

Uniqueness of $S_2$-isotropic solutions to the isotropic $L_p$ Minkowski problem

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read All smooth S2-isotropic solutions of the supercritical isotropic Lp Minkowski problem with a sufficiently large Hilbert–Brunn–Minkowski spectral gap are the unit ball.

desk verdict A solid, honestly conditional paper: new spectral-gap uniqueness theorems for the supercritical isotropic Lp Minkowski problem, with sound derivations, but the main result rests on an unverified hypothesis and one peripheral claim is plainly false. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08588 v1 pith:RISDIKV6 submitted 2025-09-10 math.DG math.APmath.MG

Yao Wan This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.APmath.MG MSC 53A0735A0252A20
keywords LpMinkowskiproblemS2-isotropicHilbert-Brunn-MinkowskioperatorspectralgapuniquenessstabilitylocalBrunn-MinkowskiinequalityMonge-Ampereequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the isotropic Lp Minkowski problem, the sphere equation h^{1-p} det(D^2h)=1, in the supercritical range p<-n, where non-spherical solutions are known to exist in the plane and higher-dimensional uniqueness is open. Its main result is conditional: if a smooth S2-isotropic solution has a sufficiently large second nonzero eigenvalue of its Hilbert–Brunn–Minkowski operator, then the solution must be the unit ball. Two theorems cover the origin-centred case and a wider range without that assumption, under slightly different eigenvalue thresholds. Along the way the paper derives quantitative stability versions of the local Brunn–Minkowski inequality and related mixed-volume inequalities, with deficits measured by L2 distances to homothetic copies. The significance is that a hard uniqueness question is reduced to a spectral-gap question, and the stability estimates are independently useful.

What carries the argument

The Hilbert–Brunn–Minkowski operator -L_K, acting on functions on the sphere by -L_K z = 1/(n-1) tr((D^2h_K)^{-1}D^2(zh_K))-z, is the central object. It is symmetric, elliptic, and positive semi-definite on L^2(V_K), with spectrum starting 0 on constants, 1 on linear functions, and then lambda_2(-L_K)>1. This second eigenvalue controls the sharpness of the spectral form of the local Brunn–Minkowski inequality: test functions orthogonal to constants and linear functions satisfy integral f(-L_K f)dV_K >= lambda_2 integral f^2 dV_K. The S2-isotropy condition makes the test functions <X_K, E_l> have explicit coefficients, so the spectral gap translates into an estimate on the L2 distance between

What would settle it

Compute lambda_2(-L_K) for any non-spherical origin-centred S2-isotropic solution of h^{1-p} det(D^2h)=1 with p in [-2n-1,-n); if the value reaches (-p-1)/(n-1), Theorem 1.1 is false. A numerical search among S2-isotropic bodies near the unit ball, using the equation as a constraint, would test the threshold directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1.1: for n>=3 and -2n-1<=p<-n, any origin-centred C^2_+ convex body K whose L2-surface-area measure is isotropic, that solves h_K^{1-p} det(D^2h_K+h_K I)=1 on the sphere, and whose Hilbert–Brunn–Minkowski operator -L_K has second nonzero eigenvalue at least (-p-1)/(n-1), must be the unit ball. Theorem 1.2 removes the origin-centred assumption for the narrower range (1-3n^2)/(2n)<=p<-n under the threshold (n-1)/(2n-1+p). The paper also proves stability estimates: a version of Minkowski's second inequality with a quantitative L2-deficit term, and a stability form of a Brunn–Minkowski-type inequality for mixed volume ratios, both controlled by lambda_2(-L_K)

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the spectral-gap bound on the second nonzero eigenvalue of the Hilbert–Brunn–Minkowski operator; the paper proves neither that every solution satisfies it nor that any non-spherical solution violating it exists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For p in (-2n-1,-n), sufficiently C^2-small origin-centred S2-isotropic solutions of the equation must be the unit ball (Corollary 1.1).
  • For p in ((1-3n^2)/(2n),-n), the same local uniqueness holds without the origin-centred assumption (Corollary 1.2).
  • Minkowski's second inequality gains a quantitative stability term: the deficit V(K[n-1],L[1])^2/V(K)-V(K[n-2],L[2]) is bounded below by a multiple of the squared L2 distance from L to a homothetic copy of itself relative to K.
  • A Brunn–Minkowski-type inequality for mixed volume ratios is stable: its deficit controls the L2 distance between normalized homothetic copies of two bodies.
  • For the unit ball K=B, these stability bounds become explicit quantitative quermassintegral and mean-width inequalities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves open whether the spectral-gap hypothesis is ever satisfied by a non-spherical solution; the result is best read as a dichotomy—either no such solution exists, or every one must violate the stated eigenvalue bound.
  • Because lambda_2(-L_K) is continuous in K and equals 2n/(n-1) for the unit ball, the corollaries give uniqueness in an open C^2-neighborhood of the ball; extending to all of space would require a uniform spectral-gap bound over all S2-isotropic solutions, which the paper does not attempt.
  • The same test-function mechanism could be adapted to higher L2-surface-area isotropy conditions or higher eigenvalues lambda_k, yielding analogous rigidity statements for other prescribed-measure problems.
  • A numerical route suggests itself: for any candidate non-spherical S2-isotropic solution, compute lambda_2(-L_K) from its support function and compare it with the p-dependent threshold to test the condition directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Hilbert-Brunn-Minkowski operator and proves conditional uniqueness for S2-isotropic solutions to the isotropic Lp Minkowski problem in the supercritical range p < -n. Theorem 1.1, under the origin-centred assumption and the spectral-gap bound lambda_2(-L_K) >= (-p-1)/(n-1), concludes that any solution in the range -2n-1 <= p < -n is the unit ball. Theorem 1.2 removes the origin-centred assumption for the range (1-3n^2)/(2n) <= p < -n under the spectral-gap bound lambda_2(-L_K) >= (n-1)/(2n-1+p). The proofs combine the S2-isotropy normalization, integration by parts with dV_K = (1/n) h_K^p dmu, the spectral stability Lemma 4.2, and Cauchy-Schwarz estimates. Sections 3-5 also derive stability versions of the local Brunn-Minkowski inequality, Minkowski's second inequality, and a Brunn-Minkowski-type inequality for mixed volume ratios.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, they provide a clean spectral mechanism for uniqueness in a range where the isotropic Lp Minkowski problem is largely open: supercritical solutions are forced to be spherical once the second non-zero eigenvalue of the Hilbert-Brunn-Minkowski operator is sufficiently large. The derivation is forward and contains no fitted parameters or hidden normalizations; the spectral-gap condition is an explicit hypothesis rather than an artifact. The stability estimates in Section 5, especially the explicit constants for K=B in (5.2), (5.9), and (5.11), are of independent interest. The main limitation is that the spectral-gap hypotheses are not verified for any non-spherical body, so Theorems 1.1-1.2 are dichotomies rather than unconditional uniqueness statements. I found no circularity in the proof, and self-citation is not load-bearing.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.2, Theorems 1.1-1.2] The two uniqueness theorems are conditional on spectral-gap lower bounds that the paper neither proves nor checks for any non-spherical S2-isotropic solution. The proofs force equality in Lemma 4.2 under the assumed bound on lambda_2(-L_K), and the argument is internally sound. However, the advertised global uniqueness rests on the unverified premise that a non-spherical solution can satisfy lambda_2(-L_K) >= (-p-1)/(n-1) or lambda_2(-L_K) >= (n-1)/(2n-1+p). The continuity statement in Section 1 only guarantees such a bound in a C^2-neighborhood of the unit ball. Thus the results should be explicitly framed as dichotomy statements: any non-spherical solution, if it exists, must violate the spectral bound; if no non-spherical solution satisfies the bound, the theorems are vacuous. I recommend adding this qualification to the abstract/introduction and, if possible, a discussion of whether
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1, N_delta definition] The sentence claiming that one can choose delta_n(tau) with N_{delta_n(tau)} = K^2_+ for tau >= (n+1)/(n-1) is false. N_delta is a fixed finite C^2-neighborhood of the unit ball, while h_{mB}-1 = m-1 has C^2 norm |m-1|, which is unbounded. What is true is the global spectral inequality lambda_2(-L_K) - lambda_2(-L_B) >= -(n+1)/(n-1) for every K, since lambda_2(-L_K)>1. Corollaries 1.1-1.2 only need local neighborhoods and are unaffected; the sentence should be corrected or removed.
  2. [Remark 1.1] The statement that the lower bounds on p are 'necessary to ensure the existence of a solution' is imprecise. The conditions are needed for the unit ball itself to satisfy the spectral hypothesis; the word 'existence' is misleading and should be replaced by something like 'non-vacuousness' or 'compatibility with the unit ball'.
  3. [Lemma 4.2, last inequality] The last inequality in Lemma 4.2 uses the bound integral h_K^2 dV_K >= n V(K)^2 / ||S_2K||. This follows from Cauchy-Schwarz using ||S_2K|| = n integral h_K^{-2} dV_K. Since this is the step that ultimately yields the equality condition 'origin-centred ball', it should be stated explicitly rather than left implicit.
  4. [Proof of Theorem 1.2] The displayed inequality labeled 'From Lemma 4.2' is a rearrangement of Lemma 4.2 combined with the integration-by-parts identity, not a direct substitution. Adding one line showing beta C >= lambda_2(C-B) is equivalent to the lemma would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the spectral-gap uniqueness theorems are forward derivations, not reductions to their inputs.

full rationale

The main derivation is self-contained. Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are forward proofs: Lemma 4.2, obtained from the spectral variational characterization of lambda_2(-L_K) and S_2-isotropy, reduces under the equation h^{1-p} det(D^2 h)=1 and the origin-centred condition to the inequality ((-p-1)/(n-1)-1) * integral |grad h|^2 >= (lambda_2(-L_K)-1) * integral |grad h|^2; the hypothesis lambda_2(-L_K) >= (-p-1)/(n-1) forces equality and hence h constant. In Theorem 1.2 the same mechanism is applied with the Cauchy-Schwarz estimate for the non-origin-centred centroid term. No parameter is fitted, no conclusion is renamed as an input, and the spectral-gap hypotheses are explicit assumptions rather than hidden normalizations. The only self-citations, [41] and [42], are contextual references and not load-bearing for the main theorem. The peripheral passage claiming that one can choose delta_n(tau) so that N_{delta_n(tau)} = K^2_+ for tau >= (n+1)/(n-1) is incorrect, because the C^2 distance from the unit ball is unbounded, but this is a false side assertion, not a circular reduction, and it does not affect the proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2. Hence no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities or fitted parameters are introduced. The central results depend on imported spectral theory and on the explicitly assumed spectral-gap bounds; the S2-isotropy normalization is assumed, not shown to be WLOG for the Lp equation.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Spectral properties of -L_K (self-adjointness, discrete spectrum, lambda_0=0, lambda_1=1, variational formula for lambda_2, continuity) as stated in Theorem 2.2.
    Imported from Kolesnikov-Milman [37]; the entire Lemma 3.1 and the stability estimates rely on it without reproof.
  • standard math Local Brunn-Minkowski inequality and Alexandrov-Fenchel inequality (Lemma 2.4 and (2.1)).
    Used to prove Lemmas 2.5, 2.6, 3.2 and 3.3; standard material in convex geometry.
  • domain assumption Every convex body K has an SL(n) transform T(K) that is S2-isotropic, from [47].
    Motivates the S2-isotropic normalization, but it is not used to reduce the Lp equation because the equation is not SL(n)-invariant for p != -n.
  • ad hoc to paper The spectral-gap hypotheses lambda_2(-L_K) >= (-p-1)/(n-1) and lambda_2(-L_K) >= (n-1)/(2n-1+p) hold for the K in question.
    They are assumed, not established; the paper only proves the bound for K in a small C^2-neighborhood of the unit ball by continuity (Corollaries 1.1-1.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uniqueness of $S_2$-isotropic solutions to the isotropic $L_p$ Minkowski problem." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RISDIKV6

@misc{pith2026250908588,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uniqueness of $S_2$-isotropic solutions to the isotropic $L_p$ Minkowski problem},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RISDIKV6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08588}
}
abstract

This paper investigates the spectral properties of the Hilbert-Brunn-Minkowski operator $L_K$ to derive stability estimates for geometric inequalities, including the local Brunn-Minkowski inequality. By analyzing the eigenvalues of $L_K$, we establish the uniqueness of $S_2$-isotropic solutions to the isotropic $L_p$ Minkowski problem in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ for $\frac{1-3n^2}{2n}\leq p<-n$ with $\lambda_2(-L_K)\geq \frac{n-1}{2n-1+p}$. Furthermore, we extend this uniqueness result to the range $-2n-1 \leq p<-n$ with $\lambda_2(-L_K)\geq \frac{-p-1}{n-1}$, assuming the origin-centred condition.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A. D. Aleksandrov,On the theory of mixed volumes of convex bodies. III. Extension of two theorems of Minkowski on convex polyhedra to arbitrary convex bodies, Mat. Sb.3(1938), 27–46

    1938

  2. [2]

    Ben Andrews,Monotone quantities and unique limits for evolving convex hypersurfaces, Internat. Math. Res. Notices20(1997), 1001–1031

    1997

  3. [3]

    Math.138(1999), no

    ,Gauss curvature flow: the fate of the rolling stones, Invent. Math.138(1999), no. 1, 151–161

    1999

  4. [4]

    ,Classification of limiting shapes for isotropic curve flows, J. Amer. Math. Soc.16(2003), no. 2, 443–459

    2003

  5. [5]

    206, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2020

    Ben Andrews, Bennett Chow, Christine Guenther, and Mat Langford,Extrinsic geometric flows, Grad- uate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 206, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2020

    2020

  6. [6]

    Math.299 (2016), 174–201

    Ben Andrews, Pengfei Guan, and Lei Ni,Flow by powers of the Gauss curvature, Adv. Math.299 (2016), 174–201

    2016

  7. [7]

    B¨ or¨ oczky, Andrea Colesanti, and Deane Yang,TheLp-Minkowski problem for−n < p <1, Adv

    Gabriele Bianchi, K´ aroly J. B¨ or¨ oczky, Andrea Colesanti, and Deane Yang,TheLp-Minkowski problem for−n < p <1, Adv. Math.341(2019), 493–535

    2019

  8. [8]

    Bonnesen and W

    T. Bonnesen and W. Fenchel,Theory of convex bodies, BCS Associates, Moscow, ID, 1987. Translated from the German and edited by L. Boron, C. Christenson and B. Smith

    1987

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    B¨ or¨ oczky,The logarithmic Minkowski conjecture and theLp-Minkowski problem, Harmonic analysis and convexity, Adv

    K´ aroly J. B¨ or¨ oczky,The logarithmic Minkowski conjecture and theLp-Minkowski problem, Harmonic analysis and convexity, Adv. Anal. Geom., vol. 9, De Gruyter, Berlin, [2023]©2023, pp. 83–118

    2023

  2. [10]

    B¨ or¨ oczky, Erwin Lutwak, Deane Yang, and Gaoyong Zhang,The logarithmic Minkowski problem, J

    K´ aroly J. B¨ or¨ oczky, Erwin Lutwak, Deane Yang, and Gaoyong Zhang,The logarithmic Minkowski problem, J. Amer. Math. Soc.26(2013), no. 3, 831–852

    2013

  3. [11]

    B¨ or¨ oczky and Christos Saroglou,Uniqueness when theLp curvature is close to be a constant forp∈[0,1), Calc

    K´ aroly J. B¨ or¨ oczky and Christos Saroglou,Uniqueness when theLp curvature is close to be a constant forp∈[0,1), Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations63(2024), no. 6, Paper No. 154, 26

    2024

  4. [12]

    B¨ or¨ oczky and Hai T

    K´ aroly J. B¨ or¨ oczky and Hai T. Trinh,The planarLp-Minkowski problem for0< p <1, Adv. in Appl. Math.87(2017), 58–81

    2017

  5. [13]

    Simon Brendle, Kyeongsu Choi, and Panagiota Daskalopoulos,Asymptotic behavior of flows by powers of the Gaussian curvature, Acta Math.219(2017), no. 1, 1–16

    2017

  6. [14]

    Carlos Cabezas-Moreno and Jinrong Hu,TheL p dual Christoffel-Minkowski problem for1< p < q≤ k+ 1with1≤k≤n, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations64(2025), no. 7, Paper No. 229

    2025

  7. [15]

    L. A. Caffarelli,A localization property of viscosity solutions to the Monge-Amp` ere equation and their strict convexity, Ann. of Math. (2)131(1990), no. 1, 129–134

    1990

  8. [16]

    part A, Adv

    Shibing Chen, Shengnan Hu, Weiru Liu, and Yiming Zhao,On the planar Gaussian-Minkowski problem. part A, Adv. Math.435(2023), no. part A, Paper No. 109351, 32. 20

    2023

  9. [17]

    Yuansi Chen,An almost constant lower bound of the isoperimetric coefficient in the KLS conjecture, Geom. Funct. Anal.31(2021), no. 1, 34–61

    2021

  10. [18]

    Pure Appl

    Shiu Yuen Cheng and Shing Tung Yau,On the regularity of the solution of then-dimensional Minkowski problem, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.29(1976), no. 5, 495–516

    1976

  11. [19]

    Math.205(2006), no

    Kai-Seng Chou and Xu-Jia Wang,TheL p-Minkowski problem and the Minkowski problem in centroaffine geometry, Adv. Math.205(2006), no. 1, 33–83

    2006

  12. [20]

    Differential Equations287(2021), 37–77

    Shi-Zhong Du,On the planarL p-Minkowski problem, J. Differential Equations287(2021), 37–77

    2021

  13. [21]

    ,Uniqueness ofL p Minkowski problem in the supercritical range(2025), available atarXiv: 2504.06946

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Fenchel and B

    W. Fenchel and B. Jessen,Mengenfunktionen und konvexe K¨ orper, Danske Vid. Selskab. Mat.-fys. Medd. 16(1938), 1–31

    1938

  15. [23]

    Firey,Shapes of worn stones, Mathematika21(1974), 1–11

    William J. Firey,Shapes of worn stones, Mathematika21(1974), 1–11

    1974

  16. [24]

    Pengfei Guan, Xi-Nan Ma, Neil Trudinger, and Xiaohua Zhu,A form of Alexandrov-Fenchel inequality, Pure Appl. Math. Q.6(2010), no. 4, Special Issue: In honor of Joseph J. Kohn. Part 2, 999–1012

    2010

  17. [25]

    Qiang Guang, Qi-rui Li, and Xu-jia Wang,TheL p-Minkowski problem with super-critical exponents (2022), available atarXiv:2203.05099

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Yan He, Qi-Rui Li, and Xu-Jia Wang,Multiple solutions of theL p-Minkowski problem, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations55(2016), no. 5, Art. 117, 13

    2016

  19. [27]

    Yijun He, Haizhong Li, Hui Ma, and Jianquan Ge,Compact embedded hypersurfaces with constant higher order anisotropic mean curvatures, Indiana Univ. Math. J.58(2009), no. 2, 853–868

    2009

  20. [28]

    Ivaki,On the uniqueness of solutions to the isotropicL p dual Minkowski problem, Nonlinear Anal.241(2024), Paper No

    Yingxiang Hu and Mohammad N. Ivaki,On the uniqueness of solutions to the isotropicL p dual Minkowski problem, Nonlinear Anal.241(2024), Paper No. 113493, 6

    2024

  21. [29]

    ,Stability of the cone-volume measure with near constant density, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN6 (2025), Paper No. rnaf062, 9

    2025

  22. [30]

    Geom.33(2005), no

    Daniel Hug, Erwin Lutwak, Deane Yang, and Gaoyong Zhang,On theL p Minkowski problem for poly- topes, Discrete Comput. Geom.33(2005), no. 4, 699–715

    2005

  23. [31]

    Ivaki,On the stability of theL p-curvature, J

    Mohammad N. Ivaki,On the stability of theL p-curvature, J. Funct. Anal.283(2022), no. 11, Paper No. 109684, 16

    2022

  24. [32]

    Ivaki and Emanuel Milman,Uniqueness of solutions to a class of isotropic curvature problems

    Mohammad N. Ivaki and Emanuel Milman,Uniqueness of solutions to a class of isotropic curvature problems. part A, Adv. Math.435(2023), no. part A, Paper No. 109350, 11

    2023

  25. [33]

    ,L p-Minkowski problem under curvature pinching, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN10(2024), 8638– 8652

    2024

  26. [34]

    Math.281(2015), 845–856

    Huaiyu Jian, Jian Lu, and Xu-Jia Wang,Nonuniqueness of solutions to theL p-Minkowski problem, Adv. Math.281(2015), 845–856

    2015

  27. [35]

    Huaiyu Jian, Jian Lu, and Guangxian Zhu,Mirror symmetric solutions to the centro-affine Minkowski problem, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations55(2016), no. 2, Art. 41, 22

    2016

  28. [36]

    Bo’az Klartag and Joseph Lehec,Bourgain ’s slicing problem and KLS isoperimetry up to polylog, Geom. Funct. Anal.32(2022), no. 5, 1134–1159

    2022

  29. [37]

    Kolesnikov and Emanuel Milman,LocalL p-Brunn-Minkowski inequalities forp <1, Mem

    Alexander V. Kolesnikov and Emanuel Milman,LocalL p-Brunn-Minkowski inequalities forp <1, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.277(2022), no. 1360, v+78

    2022

  30. [38]

    Kwok-Kun Kwong,Higher order Poincare inequalities and Minkowski-type inequalities(2021), available atarXiv:2103.10627

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Hans Lewy,On differential geometry in the large. I. Minkowski’s problem, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.43 (1938), no. 2, 258–270

    1938

  32. [40]

    Erwin Lutwak, Deane Yang, and Gaoyong Zhang,On theL p-Minkowski problem, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.356(2004), no. 11, 4359–4370

    2004

  33. [41]

    Haizhong Li and Yao Wan,Classification of solutions for the planar isotropicL p dual Minkowski problem (2022), available atarXiv:2209.14630

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    ,Uniqueness of solutions to some classes of anisotropic and isotropic curvature problems, J. Funct. Anal.287(2024), no. 3, Paper No. 110471, 30

    2024

  35. [43]

    Yu-Chu Lin and Dong-Ho Tsai,Application of Andrews and Green-Osher inequalities to nonlocal flow of convex plane curves, J. Evol. Equ.12(2012), no. 4, 833–854

    2012

  36. [44]

    Differential Equations254(2013), no

    Jian Lu and Xu-Jia Wang,Rotationally symmetric solutions to theL p-Minkowski problem, J. Differential Equations254(2013), no. 3, 983–1005. 21

    2013

  37. [45]

    Erwin Lutwak,The Brunn-Minkowski-Firey theory. I. Mixed volumes and the Minkowski problem, J. Differential Geom.38(1993), no. 1, 131–150

    1993

  38. [46]

    ,The Brunn-Minkowski-Firey theory. II. Affine and geominimal surface areas, Adv. Math.118 (1996), no. 2, 244–294

    1996

  39. [47]

    J.104(2000), no

    Erwin Lutwak, Deane Yang, and Gaoyong Zhang,A new ellipsoid associated with convex bodies, Duke Math. J.104(2000), no. 3, 375–390

    2000

  40. [48]

    London Math

    ,L p John ellipsoids, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3)90(2005), no. 2, 497–520

    2005

  41. [49]

    Differential Geom.127(2024), no

    Emanuel Milman,A sharp centro-affine isospectral inequality of Szeg¨ o-Weinberger type and theL p- Minkowski problem, J. Differential Geom.127(2024), no. 1, 373–408

    2024

  42. [50]

    ,Centro-affine differential geometry and the log-Minkowski problem, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 27(2025), no. 2, 709–772

    2025

  43. [51]

    Hermann Minkowski,Allgemeine Lehrs¨ atze ¨ uber die konvexen Polyeder, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. G¨ ottingen (1897), 198–219

  44. [52]

    Ann.57(1903), no

    ,Volumen und Oberfl¨ ache, Math. Ann.57(1903), no. 4, 447–495

    1903

  45. [53]

    Pure Appl

    Louis Nirenberg,The Weyl and Minkowski problems in differential geometry in the large, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.6(1953), 337–394

    1953

  46. [54]

    A. V. Pogorelov,The Minkowski multidimensional problem, Scripta Series in Mathematics, V. H. Win- ston & Sons, Washington, D.C.; Halsted Press [John Wiley & Sons], New York-Toronto-London, 1978

    1978

  47. [55]

    Ann.382(2022), no

    Christos Saroglou,On a non-homogeneous version of a problem of Firey, Math. Ann.382(2022), no. 3-4, 1059–1090

    2022

  48. [56]

    151, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014

    Rolf Schneider,Convex bodies: the Brunn-Minkowski theory, Second expanded edition, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 151, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014

    2014

  49. [57]

    Yair Shenfeld and Ramon van Handel,Mixed volumes and the Bochner method, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 147(2019), no. 12, 5385–5402

    2019

  50. [58]

    2327, Springer, Cham, [2023]©2023, pp

    Ramon van Handel,The local logarithmic Brunn-Minkowski inequality for zonoids, Geometric aspects of functional analysis, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 2327, Springer, Cham, [2023]©2023, pp. 355–379

    2023

  51. [59]

    Math.262(2014), 909–931

    Guangxian Zhu,The logarithmic Minkowski problem for polytopes, Adv. Math.262(2014), 909–931. Department of Mathematics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Email address:yaowan@cuhk.edu.hk

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.