Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 87 references

The near critical random bond ising model via embedding deformation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Random-bond Ising models stay conformally invariant at coupling noise up to n^{-1/3} — the cube root of the deterministic critical window — via a new differential deformation of their geometric s-embedding.

desk verdict The embedding-deformation idea is genuinely novel and the n^{-1/3} random window is plausible, but the main theorems rest on an unpublished companion paper and several sketched proofs; still worth serious refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08928 v1 pith:CPNI5N6J submitted 2025-09-10 math.PR

classification math.PR MSC 60J6782B2082B2782B43
keywords s-embeddings2DIsingmodelrandom-bonddisordernear-criticalscalingwindowFK-IsingSLE(16/3)embeddingdeformationKadanoff–Cevafermions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that the geometric s-embedding of a planar Ising model can be continuously deformed as the coupling constants move, via a first-order ODE built from Kadanoff–Ceva fermion correlators. This turns the classical critical window — where crossing probabilities stay non-degenerate — into a statement about how long the deformed embedding remains in the regular Unif(δ) class: for deterministic variations of size O(n^{-1}), the embedding stays near-critical, recovering the known n^{-1} window geometrically. The paper then drives the same deformation with independent Brownian motions on each edge, so the coupling angles at time t are π/4 + t·N_e for i.i.d. standard Gaussians N_e. The central theorem is that, with probability 1 - O(n^{-4}) and for t up to c(n log^{1/2} n)^{-1/3}, crossing probabilities in the annulus stay bounded away from 0; for t_n = n^{-(α+1/3)}, the FK interface converges P-almost surely to chordal SLE(16/3). The reason the random window is the cube root of the deterministic one is that the finite-variation part of the deformation SDE vanishes at the critical angle θ = π/4 — cot θ - E[ε]/sin θ = 0 — so the drift only grows like √t and the martingale term sets the time scale. A variant with an interacting drift that cancels the finite-variation term entirely yields a critical window of size log^{-1}(n).

What carries the argument

The central object is the s-embedding: a planar embedding of the bipartite graph of Ising vertices and faces into C, built from a spinor solving the Kadanoff–Ceva propagation equations, whose tangential quadrilaterals encode coupling angles via tan θ_z = (sin φ_{v0,z} sin φ_{v1,z} / sin φ_{v0*,z} sin φ_{v1*,z})^{1/2}. The deformation machinery is the ODE/SDE (3.8)/(5.2) for the propagator Y = dS, with generator given by sums of two-point fermions; the s-holomorphic regularity theory and the sharp two-point fermion bound |⟨χ_p χ_p'⟩| ≤ Θ|Y(p)||Y(p')|/|S(p)−S(p')| control the generator norm. The decisive identity is that the drift coefficient cot θ − E[ε]/sin θ vanishes at θ = π/4 and is of or

What would settle it

Check the quenched two-point energy-density decay (5.16) numerically or via explicit Pfaffian computations on the deformed random s-embeddings at time t = n^{-2/3} log^{1/3} n: the bound |E[σ_e σ_r] − E[σ_e]E[σ_r]| ≤ C n^{-2}|e−r|^{-2} (equivalently, the variance sum Σ_r(·)^2 = O(log n)) must hold for a positive fraction of environments. Any environment where the covariance decays slower, say n^{-1}|e−r|^{-2}, makes the drift in Proposition 5.3 grow like n^{1/2} t^{3/2} and eliminates the n^{-1/3} window.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the s-embedding — the planar quadrilateral picture of the Ising model — can be deformed continuously in the coupling constants via Y'(t) = (1/2)Σ_k m_k[Y(c^+_k)⟨χ·,χ_{a^+_k}⟩ − Y(a^+_k)⟨χ·,χ_{c^+_k}⟩], which recovers the deterministic critical window n^{-1} as the time the embedding deforms macroscopically. Driven by independent Brownian motions, this SDE keeps the embedding in the regular Unif(δ) class for times up to c(n log^{1/2}n)^{-2/3} with probability 1−O(n^{-4}): coupling deviations of order n^{-1/3} still admit uniform box-crossing, and for t_n=n^{-(α+1/3)} the FK interface converges P-almost surely to chordal SLE(16/3). The load-bearing cancellation is tha

Load-bearing premise

The n^{-1/3} random window rests on a sharp quenched decay estimate for energy-density correlations on the near-square deformed embeddings (bound (5.16), imported from in-preparation work and used in Proposition 5.3, Step 0); if that decay fails, the drift term of the SDE is not small and the window collapses back toward the n^{-1/2} scale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Theorem 1.5: with coupling angles π/4 + t·N_e (N_e i.i.d. standard Gaussians) and t ≤ c(n log^{1/2} n)^{-1/3}, the FK-Ising model on the n×n box has an open circuit in the annulus with probability ≥ c > 0, with environment-failure probability O(n^{-4}).
  • Theorem 1.6: for t_n = n^{-(α+1/3)}, the FK interface separating wired and free arcs converges P-almost surely to chordal SLE(16/3) in the scaling limit.
  • Theorem 1.7: the energy density's second-order correction is conformally covariant P-almost surely once normalized by the random full-plane value, which itself fluctuates by more than the 1/n critical correction at t ~ n^{-1/3}.
  • Theorem 1.8: a weakly random interacting model, whose angle SDE cancels the finite-variation drift, has a critical window of size log^{-1}(n), with conformal invariance holding for t_n = log^{-C}(n), C large.
  • Theorem 1.4: the deformation method reproduces the universal deterministic critical window n^{-1} on any Unif(δ) s-embedding, including critical doubly-periodic graphs, and yields a new proof of the strong box-crossing property in the massive regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mechanism suggests a general principle for weakly random FK models with q ∈ [1,4]: if the deterministic window is n^{-ν} and the critical model is conformally invariant with sufficient mixing, the random window should be n^{-ν/3}; the paper states this as a conjecture, and the sharp quenched correlation bound appears to be the bottleneck for making it rigorous.
  • If the sharp quenched energy-density bound (5.16) holds at mesoscopic scales rather than only at the Unif(1/n) scale, the deformation method could be iterated to push the random window beyond n^{-1/3}, or to treat spatial mixtures of locally off-critical regions that balance to critical on average — a direction the paper leaves open.
  • The interacting model's logarithmic window may serve as a candidate for a critical random-bond Ising model with genuinely macroscopic disorder, since it preserves the conformal structure at every scale; a testable extension is to transplant the construction to the torus and measure crossing probabilities at t ~ log^{-1} n.
  • Because the deformation records the entire discrete conformal structure, the same SDE framework could yield convergence of fermionic observables for massive Ising models in arbitrary rough domains, going beyond the near-critical theory where such convergence is known only on regular grids.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a deformation method for s-embeddings of planar Ising models. When coupling constants move continuously, the associated Kadanoff–Ceva fermion is shown to solve an ODE/SDE, provided suitable fermionic correlations are controlled. The deterministic part gives a new proof of the near-critical window of size n^{-1} for massive deformations (Theorems 1.3 and 1.4). The main random results are Theorems 1.5 and 1.6: for i.i.d. Gaussian edge couplings θ_e = π/4 + t N_e with t up to c_3 (n log^{1/2} n)^{-1/3}, crossing probabilities in the annulus remain bounded away from 0 with P-probability at least 1 - O(n^{-4}), and for t_n = n^{-(α+1/3)} the FK interface converges P-almost surely to chordal SLE(16/3). Theorem 1.7 gives the same for the energy density. Theorem 1.8 constructs an interacting random model with a log^{-2} n window and states corresponding convergence results. The paper also contains heuristic optimality discussion (§5.4) and two open questions.

Significance. If the main theorems hold, this is a significant contribution: it identifies a random near-critical window of n^{-1/3} (up to logs), far beyond the deterministic n^{-1}, and it provides a new geometric mechanism (embedding deformation) that is potentially applicable beyond the square lattice and to dimers. The method is original and the paper contains several valuable insights, including the role of the vanishing of cot θ - E[ε]/sin θ at criticality and the cancellation of the finite-variation term in the SDE. However, the quantitative core rests on estimates imported from the author's unpublished works [61] and [62], and several proofs are sketches. The paper is therefore not yet in a form that allows the reader to verify the main claims independently.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.3, Eq. (5.16)] The n^{-1/3} window in Theorem 1.5 and the P-a.s. conformal invariance in Theorem 1.6 depend critically on the sharp truncated energy-density bound |E_{S(s)}[σ_ek σ_er] - E_{S(s)}[σ_ek]E_{S(s)}[σ_er]| = O(n^{-2}|S(0)(ek)-S(0)(er)|^{-2}), quoted as [62, Theorem 1.3]. This is used in Step 0 of Proposition 5.3 to turn the finite-variation term into O(√(s log n)), which upgrades the admissible SDE time from n^{-1} to n^{-2/3} log^{-1/3}. No proof or precise statement is included; the remark that it 'could also have been derived using the Pfaffian structure' is not a proof. Since [62] is in preparation, this is a load-bearing external dependency that prevents verification of the paper's central claims.
  2. [§6, Lemma 6.1 and Theorem 6.3] The convergence of FK observables to the SLE(16/3) limit requires Lipschitz regularity of s-holomorphic functions on the deformed embeddings (Lemma 6.1) and the quantitative approximation of H_F by a harmonic function (Theorem 6.3, estimate (6.11)). The proof of Lemma 6.1 is only a sketch in Appendix A.1, and Theorem 6.3 is presented as a specialization of [15, Section 4] with several steps ('Step 1'–'Step 4') stated without full justification, e.g. the error terms in (6.14)–(6.16) and the final bound H_F = O(δ^2/d_u^3). These are indispensable for Theorem 1.6; the manuscript should provide complete proofs or precise references to publicly available sources.
  3. [§5.1, Lemma 5.1] The SDE construction is the foundation of all random results. Its proof approximates Brownian motions by piecewise-linear functions and passes to the limit, but the passage is only sketched: the claimed uniform L2 bounds, the O(L^{-3/2}) error, and the identification of the finite-variation term via the second-order formula (A.13) are not fully justified. The off-diagonal terms g^{(p)}_{k,r} in (A.14)–(A.15) are stated without derivation. Since the rest of the paper relies on this lemma, the proof needs to be made rigorous.
  4. [§6, Theorem 1.8 (second part)] The statement that for t_n = log^{-C} n the analogues of Theorems 1.6 and 1.7 hold is only sketched ('We do not provide a proof here, only a sketch'). The same applies to the proof of Theorem 1.7, which refers to 'apply verbatim [62]', an unpublished manuscript. These results are part of the paper's advertised claims and should either be proven in the text or explicitly marked as conditional on the cited works.
minor comments (5)
  1. [General notation] The symbol t is overloaded: it denotes the deformation time in the ODE/SDE, the amplitude of the random perturbation in θ_e = π/4 + t N_e, and a time parameter in Theorem 1.5/1.6. This creates confusion, e.g. in §5.3 where t_n is both a time and a standard deviation. Please distinguish these uses clearly.
  2. [§1.3, Theorem 1.5] The statement says 'i.i.d. standard Gaussian variables' but the construction uses Brownian motions and the Skorokhod embedding is only mentioned later. Please clarify the exact relation between the Brownian time and the Gaussian amplitude t.
  3. [§5.4] The optimality discussion is heuristic and informal. It should be labeled as such, and the phrase 'one cannot expect' should be accompanied by a precise conjecture or a counterexample.
  4. [Various] There are numerous typos and minor language issues: 'the the', 'knots', 'es', inconsistent use of 's-embedding' and 's-embeddings', and missing punctuation. A careful editorial pass is needed.
  5. [References] The paper relies heavily on [61] and [62], both marked 'in preparation'. Since these are not publicly available, the statements used from them should be reproduced in an appendix or their status should be clarified.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The n^{-1/3} random window and P-a.s. SLE(16/3) convergence rest on the truncated energy-density bound (5.16) quoted from the author's in-preparation [62]; the central quantitative improvement is imported by self-citation.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 5.3, Proposition 5.3, Step 0 (Eq. (5.16)); also Section 2.6 (Eq. (2.23))]
    "One can now use [62, Theorem 1.3] that ensures that for any s-embedding that satisfies Unif(1/n,10,π/10) (and whose distances are comparable up to some universal constant to those in S(0)) one has |E_{S(s)}[σ_ek]E_{S(s)}[σ_er]−E_{S(s)}[σ_ek σ_er]| = O(1/n^2 1/|S(0)(ek)−S(0)(er)|^2). (5.16) Note that this last bound could also have been derived using the Pfaffian structure of Ising fermions together with (2.23)."

    This bound is the precise input that makes the finite-variation term in the SDE (5.2) small: it replaces the crude O(1) bound on |cot θ - E[ε]/sin θ| used in Proposition 5.2 by O(√(s log n)), thereby upgrading the admissible deformation time from T ≍ n^{-1} to T ≍ n^{-2/3} log^{-1/3}. That upgraded time is exactly what produces the n^{-1/3} random window of Theorem 1.5 and, via Borel–Cantelli, the P-almost-sure SLE(16/3) convergence of Theorem 1.6. The estimate is quoted from [62, Theorem 1.3], an in-preparation paper co-authored by the present author, and the parenthetical remark that it 'could also have been derived' is not a derivation contained in this paper. Thus the central quantitative claim is conditional on a load-bearing self-citation to an unverified result; if (5.16) fails unif

full rationale

The deformation machinery itself is not circular: Lemma 3.1 and the ODE/SDE (3.8), (5.2) are derived from Kadanoff–Ceva mismatches and from Itô-formula expansions, not from the target SLE/crossing statements. The deterministic window n^{-1} and the geometric interpretation in Theorem 1.4 are likewise obtained by ODE growth estimates rather than by assuming the conclusion. The main circularity-relevant defect is the reliance of the n^{-1/3} window and the P-a.s. conformal-invariance theorem on the sharp truncated energy-density estimate (5.16), imported from the author's in-preparation joint work [62] (and its two-point fermion precursor (2.23), also attributed to [62]). The paper explicitly notes the bound could be derived by Pfaffian methods, but no such derivation is provided, so the proof as written reduces the central new quantitative claim to a self-citation. Because the imported estimate is structurally distinct from the target result and the deformation construction is independently novel, this is partial, not total, circularity: score 5 rather than 6–8. If [62] is supplied and verified, the central claim would be non-circular; as written, it is a load-bearing dependency on the author's own unpublished work.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main construction is self-contained, but the quantitative bounds that produce the n^{-1/3} window are imported from the author's own in-preparation work [62]; these are the heaviest unverifiable inputs. The remaining assumptions are standard regularity and SDE tools.

free parameters (5)
  • m (mass bound)
    Proposition 4.1 requires |m_e| <= m for a small enough universal m; the value is not computed and is chosen to make Gronwall estimates hold.
  • r0 = 10, theta0 = pi/10 = 10, pi/10
    Parameters in Unif(delta, r0, theta0) fixed by hand in Propositions 4.1, 5.2, 5.3 to apply the regularity theory of [15,23]. The proofs work for any fixed r0, theta0.
  • c1, c2, c3 (t-weakly random window constants)
    Theorem 1.5 requires 0 <= t <= c3 (n log^{1/2} n)^{-1/3} with c3 small enough; Theorem 1.8 uses c1, c2 similar. Universal but numerically unspecified.
  • alpha in t_n = n^{-(alpha + 1/3)} = any fixed alpha > 0
    Theorem 1.6 holds for any fixed alpha > 0; this is a slack parameter used to absorb polynomial corrections, not fitted.
  • C in Theorem 1.8 (log^{-C} n) = large enough
    The interacting model's conformal invariance is stated for t_n = log(n)^{-C} for large enough C; the value is not specified.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Unif(delta) s-embeddings satisfy the strong box-crossing property (Theorem 1.2 from [61])
    Quoted and used in Theorems 1.5, 1.6, 1.8 as the criticality criterion. [61] is the author's own arXiv preprint, not machine-checked.
  • domain assumption Two-point fermion decay (2.23) from [62, Theorem 1.2]
    Section 2.6; used in Propositions 4.1, 5.2, 5.3 to convert embedding stability into the size of the critical window. [62] is in preparation and not publicly verifiable.
  • domain assumption Energy-density correlation bound (5.16) from [62, Theorem 1.3]
    Proof of Proposition 5.3, Step 0; supplies the cancellation that upgrades the window from n^{-1/2} to n^{-1/3}. [62] is in preparation.
  • standard math s-holomorphic regularity theory (Theorem 2.1 from [15,23])
    Used to get Holder/Lipschitz control of observables in Section 6; established in Chelkak, Laslier, Russkikh works and the s-embedding literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The near critical random bond ising model via embedding deformation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CPNI5N6J

@misc{pith2026250908928,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The near critical random bond ising model via embedding deformation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CPNI5N6J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08928}
}
abstract

Using the formalism of differential equations, we introduce a new method to continuously deform the $s$-embeddings associated with a family of Ising models as their coupling constants vary. This provides a geometric interpretation of the critical scaling window $\asymp n^{-1}$ for the model on the $n \times n$ box. We then drive this deterministic deformation process by i.i.d.\ Brownian motions on each edge, centered at the critical model, thereby generating random $s$-embeddings as solutions to stochastic differential equations attached to near-critical random bond Ising models. In this setting, with high probability with respect to the random environment, the Ising model remains conformally invariant in the scaling limit, even when the standard deviation of the random variables (up to logarithmic corrections) is $n^{-\frac{1}{3}} \gg n^{-1}$, far exceeding the deterministic critical window. We also construct an Ising model with slightly correlated (in space) random coupling constants, whose critical window is $ \asymp \log(n)^{-1}$ on the $n \times n$ box. Our method, which can also be applied to the dimer context, naturally extends to a much broader class of graphs and opens a new approach to understanding the critical Ising model in random environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08928 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Left) Notation for a given quad z ∈ ♢(G) with an arbitrary embedding in the plane. Vertices of the primal graph G• are shown as black dots, while vertices of the dual graph G◦ , cor￾responding to the faces of G, are represented as white dots. The so-called corners, corresponding to the edges of the bipartite graph Λ(G) = G• ∪G◦ , are depicted as triangles. This figure illustrates a portion of the double cover of th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A] or Figure 1), the Kadanoff-Ceva observables satisfy simple local linear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Left) The double cover Υ× branching around each ver￾tex of G•∪G◦∪♢(G) (Right) The double cover Υ× (q) that branches everywhere except around v • (q) and u ◦ (q). Those two double cov￾ers can be identified with each other away from q. The corner q + is chosen so that the two double-covers have the same branching structure around the quad z + q . This figure is similar to [21, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: For both pictures, dashed lines correspond to neigh￾boring relation on double covers. The South-Eastern corners are labeled by a, the North-Eastern corners are labeled by b, the North￾Western corners are labeled by c and the South-Western corners are labeled by d. (Lef…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [62]

    Convergence of the energy density on general s-embeddings

    R´ emy Mahfouf and Sung Chul Park. “Convergence of the energy density on general s-embeddings”. In: (In preparation)

  2. [61]

    Crossing estimates on general s-embeddings

    R´ emy Mahfouf. “Crossing estimates on general s-embeddings”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.08470 (2023)

  3. [1]

    H¨ older regularity and dimension bounds for random curves

    M Aizenman and A Burchard. “H¨ older regularity and dimension bounds for random curves”. In: Duke Mathematical Journal 99.3 (1999), pp. 419–453

  4. [2]

    Rounding effects of quenched randomness on first-order phase transitions

    Michael Aizenman and Jan Wehr. “Rounding effects of quenched randomness on first-order phase transitions”. In:Communications in mathematical physics 130.3 (1990), pp. 489–528

  5. [3]

    Energy correlations of non-integrable Ising models: the scaling limit in the cylinder

    Giovanni Antinucci, Alessandro Giuliani, and Rafael L Greenblatt. “Energy correlations of non-integrable Ising models: the scaling limit in the cylinder”. In: Communications in Mathematical Physics 397.1 (2023), pp. 393–483

  6. [4]

    The near-critical FK-percolation

    Emile Av´ erous and R´ emy Mahfouf. “The near-critical FK-percolation”. In: ArXiv e-print ()

  7. [5]

    Tau-functions ` a la Dub´ edat and prob- abilities of cylindrical events for double-dimers and CLE (4)

    Mikhail Basok and Dmitry Chelkak. “Tau-functions ` a la Dub´ edat and prob- abilities of cylindrical events for double-dimers and CLE (4)”. In: Journal of the European Mathematical Society 23.8 (2021), pp. 2787–2832

  8. [6]

    Nesting of double-dimer loops: lo- cal fluctuations and convergence to the nesting field of CLE (4)

    Mikhail Basok and Konstantin Izyurov. “Nesting of double-dimer loops: lo- cal fluctuations and convergence to the nesting field of CLE (4)”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01574 (2025)

Show all 87 references
  1. [7]

    Embedding deformations for the dimer model

    Mikhail Basok, Benoit Laslier, and R´ emy Mahfouf. “Embedding deformations for the dimer model”. In: In preparation (2025+)

  2. [8]

    Smirnov’s fermionic observable away from criticality

    V. Beffara and H. Duminil-Copin. “Smirnov’s fermionic observable away from criticality”. In: Ann. Probab.40.6 (2012), pp. 2667–2689.issn: 0091-1798. doi: 10.1214/11-AOP689. url: https://doi.org/10.1214/11-AOP689

  3. [9]

    The self-dual point of the two- dimensional random-cluster model is critical for q greater than 1

    Vincent Beffara and Hugo Duminil-Copin. “The self-dual point of the two- dimensional random-cluster model is critical for q greater than 1”. In: Prob- ability Theory and Related Fields 153.3 (2012), pp. 511–542

  4. [10]

    Infinite conformal symmetry of critical fluctuations in two dimen- sions

    Alexander A Belavin, Alexander M Polyakov, and Alexander B Zamolod- chikov. “Infinite conformal symmetry of critical fluctuations in two dimen- sions”. In: Journal of Statistical Physics 34 (1984), pp. 763–774. REFERENCES 69

  5. [11]

    Near-critical dimers and massive SLE

    Nathana¨ el Berestycki and Levi Haunschmid-Sibitz. “Near-critical dimers and massive SLE”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15717 (2022)

  6. [12]

    Gaussian Free Field and Discrete Gaussians in Periodic Dimer Models

    Tomas Berggren and Matthew Nicoletti. “Gaussian Free Field and Discrete Gaussians in Periodic Dimer Models”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07241 (2025)

  7. [13]

    The Ising magnetization exponent on Z 2 is 1/15

    Federico Camia, Christophe Garban, and Charles M Newman. “The Ising magnetization exponent on Z 2 is 1/15”. In: Probability Theory and Related Fields 160.1 (2014), pp. 175–187

  8. [14]

    The scal- ing limit of boundary spin correlations in non-integrable Ising models

    Giulia Cava, Alessandro Giuliani, and Rafael Leon Greenblatt. “The scal- ing limit of boundary spin correlations in non-integrable Ising models”. In: Journal of Mathematical Physics 66.2 (2025)

  9. [15]

    Ising model and s-embeddings of planar graphs

    Dmitry Chelkak. “Ising model and s-embeddings of planar graphs”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.14559 (2020)

  10. [16]

    Planar Ising model at criticality: state-of-the-art and per- spectives

    Dmitry Chelkak. “Planar Ising model at criticality: state-of-the-art and per- spectives”. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians— Rio de Janeiro 2018. Vol. IV. Invited lectures . World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2018, pp. 2801–2828

  11. [17]

    Revisiting the combi- natorics of the 2D Ising model

    Dmitry Chelkak, David Cimasoni, and Adrien Kassel. “Revisiting the combi- natorics of the 2D Ising model”. In: Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e D 4.3 (2017), pp. 309–385

  12. [18]

    Conformal in- variance of spin correlations in the planar Ising model

    Dmitry Chelkak, Cl´ ement Hongler, and Konstantin Izyurov. “Conformal in- variance of spin correlations in the planar Ising model”. In: Ann. of Math. (2) 181.3 (2015), pp. 1087–1138. issn: 0003-486X. doi: 10.4007/annals.2015. 181.3.5. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.4007/annals.2015.181.3.5

  13. [19]

    Correlations of primary fields in the critical Ising model

    Dmitry Chelkak, Cl´ ement Hongler, and Konstantin Izyurov. “Correlations of primary fields in the critical Ising model”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.10263 (2021)

  14. [20]

    Holomorphic spinor observables in the critical Ising model

    Dmitry Chelkak and Konstantin Izyurov. “Holomorphic spinor observables in the critical Ising model”. In: Communications in Mathematical Physics 322.2 (2013), pp. 303–332

  15. [21]

    Universality of spin correlations in the Ising model on isoradial graphs

    Dmitry Chelkak, Konstantin Izyurov, and Remy Mahfouf. “Universality of spin correlations in the Ising model on isoradial graphs”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.12858 (2021)

  16. [22]

    Bipartite dimer model: perfect t-embeddings and Lorentz-minimal surfaces

    Dmitry Chelkak, Benoˆ ıt Laslier, and Marianna Russkikh. “Bipartite dimer model: perfect t-embeddings and Lorentz-minimal surfaces”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.06272 (2021)

  17. [23]

    Dimer model and holomorphic functions on t-embeddings of planar graphs

    Dmitry Chelkak, Benoˆ ıt Laslier, and Marianna Russkikh. “Dimer model and holomorphic functions on t-embeddings of planar graphs”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.11871 (2020)

  18. [24]

    Convergence of FK Ising observables on general s-embedding with smooth limiting surface

    Dmitry Chelkak and Sung Chul Park. “Convergence of FK Ising observables on general s-embedding with smooth limiting surface”. In: (In preparation)

  19. [25]

    Fluctuations in the Aztec dia- monds via a space-like maximal surface in Minkowski 3-space

    Dmitry Chelkak and Sanjay Ramassamy. “Fluctuations in the Aztec dia- monds via a space-like maximal surface in Minkowski 3-space”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.07540 (2020)

  20. [26]

    Discrete complex analysis on isora- dial graphs

    Dmitry Chelkak and Stanislav Smirnov. “Discrete complex analysis on isora- dial graphs”. In: Advances in Mathematics 228.3 (2011), pp. 1590–1630

  21. [27]

    Universality in the 2D Ising model and conformal invariance of fermionic observables

    Dmitry Chelkak and Stanislav Smirnov. “Universality in the 2D Ising model and conformal invariance of fermionic observables”. In: Invent. Math. 189.3 70 REFERENCES (2012), pp. 515–580. issn: 0020-9910. doi: 10.1007/s00222- 011- 0371- 2 . url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00222-0...

  22. [28]

    On the convergence of massive loop-erased random walks to massive SLE(2) curves

    Dmitry Chelkak and Yijun Wan. “On the convergence of massive loop-erased random walks to massive SLE(2) curves”. In:Electronic Journal of Probability 26.none (2021), pp. 1 –35. doi: 10.1214/21- EJP615 . url: https://doi. org/10.1214/21-EJP615

  23. [29]

    Convergence of Ising interfaces to Schramm’s SLE curves

    Dmitry Chelkak et al. “Convergence of Ising interfaces to Schramm’s SLE curves”. In: C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 352.2 (2014), pp. 157–161. issn: 1631-073X. doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2013.12.002 . url: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.crma.2013.12.002

  24. [30]

    The height fluctuations of an off-critical dimer model on the square grid

    Sunil Chhita. “The height fluctuations of an off-critical dimer model on the square grid”. In: Journal of statistical physics 148.1 (2012), pp. 67–88

  25. [31]

    Criticality in the two-dimensional random- bond Ising model

    Sora Cho and Matthew PA Fisher. “Criticality in the two-dimensional random- bond Ising model”. In: Physical Review B 55.2 (1997), p. 1025

  26. [32]

    The critical temperature for the Ising model on planar doubly periodic graphs

    David Cimasoni and Hugo Duminil-Copin. “The critical temperature for the Ising model on planar doubly periodic graphs”. In: Electron. J. Probab. 18 (2013), no. 44, 18. issn: 1083-6489. doi: 10 . 1214 / EJP . v18 - 2352. url: https://doi.org/10.1214/EJP.v18-2352

  27. [33]

    Critical behaviour of the phase transition in the 2D Ising model with impurities

    Viktor S Dotsenko and Vladimir S Dotsenko. “Critical behaviour of the phase transition in the 2D Ising model with impurities”. In: Advances in Physics 32.2 (1983), pp. 129–172

  28. [34]

    Renormalisation-group calculation of correlation functions for the 2D random bond Ising and Potts models

    Vladimir Dotsenko, Marco Picco, and Pierre Pujol. “Renormalisation-group calculation of correlation functions for the 2D random bond Ising and Potts models”. In: Nuclear Physics B 455.3 (1995), pp. 701–723

  29. [35]

    Parafermionic observables and their applications to planar statistical physics models

    Hugo Duminil-Copin. “Parafermionic observables and their applications to planar statistical physics models”. In: Ensaios Matematicos 25 (2013), pp. 1– 371

  30. [36]

    The near-critical planar FK-Ising model

    Hugo Duminil-Copin, Christophe Garban, and G´ abor Pete. “The near-critical planar FK-Ising model”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 326.1 (2014), pp. 1–35. issn: 0010-3616. doi: 10.1007/s00220-013-1857-0 . url: https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00220-013-1857-0

  31. [37]

    Connection prob- abilities and RSW-type bounds for the two-dimensional FK Ising model

    Hugo Duminil-Copin, Cl´ ement Hongler, and Pierre Nolin. “Connection prob- abilities and RSW-type bounds for the two-dimensional FK Ising model”. In: Communications on pure and applied mathematics 64.9 (2011), pp. 1165– 1198

  32. [38]

    Planar random-cluster model: scaling relations

    Hugo Duminil-Copin and Ioan Manolescu. “Planar random-cluster model: scaling relations”. In: Forum of Mathematics, Pi. Vol. 10. Cambridge Univer- sity Press. 2022, e23

  33. [39]

    Generalization of the fortuin-kasteleyn- swendsen-wang representation and monte carlo algorithm

    Robert G Edwards and Alan D Sokal. “Generalization of the fortuin-kasteleyn- swendsen-wang representation and monte carlo algorithm”. In: Physical re- view D 38.6 (1988), p. 2009

  34. [40]

    On the random-cluster model II. The percolation model

    Cornelis Marius Fortuin. “On the random-cluster model II. The percolation model”. In: Physica 58.3 (1972), pp. 393–418

  35. [41]

    Friedli and Y

    S. Friedli and Y. Velenik. Statistical mechanics of lattice systems . A concrete mathematical introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018, pp. xix+622. isbn: 978-1-107-18482-4. REFERENCES 71

  36. [42]

    Energy field of critical Ising model and examples of singular fields in QFT

    Christophe Garban and Antti Kupiainen. “Energy field of critical Ising model and examples of singular fields in QFT”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.02554 (2025)

  37. [43]

    The scal- ing limit of the energy correlations in non-integrable Ising models

    Alessandro Giuliani, Rafael L Greenblatt, and Vieri Mastropietro. “The scal- ing limit of the energy correlations in non-integrable Ising models”. In:Journal of mathematical physics 53.9 (2012)

  38. [44]

    Private Communications

    Trishen S. Gunaratnam. “Private Communications”. In: (2025)

  39. [45]

    Ex- istence of a tricritical point for the Blume–Capel model on d

    Trishen S Gunaratnam, Dmitrii Krachun, and Christoforos Panagiotis. “Ex- istence of a tricritical point for the Blume–Capel model on d”. In: Probability and Mathematical Physics 5.3 (2024), pp. 785–845

  40. [47]

    The energy density in the planar Ising model

    Cl´ ement Hongler and Stanislav Smirnov. “The energy density in the planar Ising model”. In: Acta Math. 211.2 (2013), pp. 191–225. issn: 0001-5962. doi: 10.1007/s11511-013-0102-1 . url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11511- 013-0102-1

  41. [48]

    Beitrag zur theorie des ferromagnetismus

    Ernst Ising. “Beitrag zur theorie des ferromagnetismus”. In: Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik 31.1 (1925), pp. 253–258

  42. [49]

    Holomorphic spinor observables and interfaces in the critical Ising mode Ph. D

    Konstantin Izyurov. “Holomorphic spinor observables and interfaces in the critical Ising mode Ph. D”. PhD thesis. thesis, 2011

  43. [50]

    Determination of an operator algebra for the two-dimensional Ising model

    Leo P. Kadanoff and Horacio Ceva. “Determination of an operator algebra for the two-dimensional Ising model”. In: Phys. Rev. B (3) 3 (1971), pp. 3918–

  44. [51]

    Limits of conformal images and conformal images of limits for planar random curves

    Alex M Karrila. “Limits of conformal images and conformal images of limits for planar random curves”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.05608 (2018)

  45. [52]

    Conformal invariance in random cluster models. II. Full scaling limit as a branching SLE

    Antti Kemppainen and Stanislav Smirnov. “Conformal invariance in random cluster models. II. Full scaling limit as a branching SLE”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08527 (2016)

  46. [53]

    Random curves, scaling limits and Loewner evolutions

    Antti Kemppainen and Stanislav Smirnov. “Random curves, scaling limits and Loewner evolutions”. In: The Annals of Probability 45.2 (2017), pp. 698– 779

  47. [54]

    Conformal invariance of domino tiling

    Richard Kenyon. “Conformal invariance of domino tiling”. In: Ann. Probab. 28.2 (2000), pp. 759–795. issn: 0091-1798. doi: 10.1214/aop/1019160260 . url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aop/1019160260

  48. [55]

    Dominos and the Gaussian free field

    Richard Kenyon. “Dominos and the Gaussian free field”. In: Annals of prob- ability (2001), pp. 1128–1137

  49. [56]

    The asymptotic determinant of the discrete Laplacian

    Richard Kenyon. “The asymptotic determinant of the discrete Laplacian”. In: (2000)

  50. [57]

    Dimers and Circle patterns

    Richard Kenyon et al. “Dimers and Circle patterns”. In: arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1810.05616 (2018), arXiv:1810.05616. arXiv: 1810.05616 [math-ph]

  51. [58]

    Springer, 2016

    Jean-Fran¸ cois Le Gall.Brownian motion, martingales, and stochastic calculus. Springer, 2016

  52. [59]

    Analyse du mod` ele d’Ising planaire au-del` a du cadre critique Z-invariant

    R´ emy Mahfouf. “Analyse du mod` ele d’Ising planaire au-del` a du cadre critique Z-invariant”. PhD thesis. Universit´ e Paris-Saclay, 2022

  53. [60]

    Convergence of Ising fermions in critical doubly periodic graphs via embedding deformation

    R´ emy Mahfouf. “Convergence of Ising fermions in critical doubly periodic graphs via embedding deformation”. In: In preparation (2025). 72 REFERENCES

  54. [63]

    Off-critical lattice models and mas- sive SLEs

    Nikolai Makarov and Stanislav Smirnov. “Off-critical lattice models and mas- sive SLEs”. In:XVIth International Congress On Mathematical Physics: (With DVD-ROM). World Scientific. 2010, pp. 362–371

  55. [64]

    Painlev´ e functions of the third kind

    Barry M McCoy, Craig A Tracy, and Tai Tsun Wu. “Painlev´ e functions of the third kind”. In: Journal of Mathematical Physics 18.5 (1977), pp. 1058–1092

  56. [65]

    The two-dimensional Ising model

    Barry M McCoy and Tai Tsun Wu. “The two-dimensional Ising model”. In: The Two-Dimensional Ising Model . Harvard University Press, 2013

  57. [66]

    McCoy and Tai Tsun Wu

    Barry M. McCoy and Tai Tsun Wu. The two-dimensional Ising model. Second. Corrected reprint of [ MR3618829], with a new preface and a new chapter (Chapter XVII). Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2014, pp. xvi+454. isbn: 978-0-486-49335-0; 0-486-49335-0

  58. [67]

    Discrete Riemann surfaces and the Ising model

    Christian Mercat. “Discrete Riemann surfaces and the Ising model”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 218.1 (2001), pp. 177–216. issn: 0010-3616. doi: 10 . 1007 / s002200000348. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002200000348

  59. [68]

    Two-dimensional random-bond Ising model, free fermions, and the network model

    F Merz and JT Chalker. “Two-dimensional random-bond Ising model, free fermions, and the network model”. In:Physical Review B 65.5 (2002), p. 054425

  60. [69]

    Asymmetry of near-critical percolation interfaces

    Pierre Nolin and Wendelin Werner. “Asymmetry of near-critical percolation interfaces”. In: Journal of the American Mathematical Society 22.3 (2009), pp. 797–819

  61. [70]

    Crystal statistics. I. A two-dimensional model with an order- disorder transition

    Lars Onsager. “Crystal statistics. I. A two-dimensional model with an order- disorder transition”. In: Physical Review 65.3-4 (1944), p. 117

  62. [71]

    Planar Ising Correlations

    John Palmer. Planar Ising Correlations. Vol. 49. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

  63. [72]

    Interface scaling limit for the critical planar Ising model per- turbed by a magnetic field

    L´ eonie Papon. “Interface scaling limit for the critical planar Ising model per- turbed by a magnetic field”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16452 (2024)

  64. [73]

    Massive SLE 4 and the scaling limit of the massive harmonic explorer

    L´ eonie Papon. “Massive SLE 4 and the scaling limit of the massive harmonic explorer”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.11509 (2023)

  65. [75]

    Massive Scaling Limit of the Ising Model: Subcritical Analy- sis and Isomonodromy

    S. C. Park. “Massive Scaling Limit of the Ising Model: Subcritical Analy- sis and Isomonodromy”. In: arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1811.06636 (Nov. 2018), arXiv:1811.06636. arXiv: 1811.06636 [math.PR]

  66. [76]

    Convergence of fermionic observables in the massive planar FK- Ising model

    SC Park. “Convergence of fermionic observables in the massive planar FK- Ising model”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.04649 (2021)

  67. [77]

    Quadratic identities for Ising model correlations

    Jacques HH Perk. “Quadratic identities for Ising model correlations”. In: Physics Letters A 79.1 (1980), pp. 3–5

  68. [78]

    Convergence rates of random discrete model curves ap- proaching SLE curves in the scaling limit

    Larissa Richards. Convergence rates of random discrete model curves ap- proaching SLE curves in the scaling limit . University of Toronto (Canada), 2021

  69. [79]

    Holonomic quantum fields. IV

    Mikio Sato, Tetsuji Miwa, and Michio Jimbo. “Holonomic quantum fields. IV”. In: Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences 15.3 (1979), pp. 871–972. REFERENCES 73

  70. [80]

    Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees

    Oded Schramm. “Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees”. In: Israel Journal of Mathematics 118.1 (2000), pp. 221–288

  71. [81]

    Harmonic explorer and its convergence to SLE4

    Oded Schramm and Scott Sheffield. “Harmonic explorer and its convergence to SLE4”. In: The Annals of Probability 33.6 (2005), pp. 2127 –2148. doi: 10. 1214/009117905000000477. url: https://doi.org/10.1214/009117905000000477

  72. [82]

    Critical behavior of the two-dimensional Ising model with ran- dom bonds

    BN Shalaev. “Critical behavior of the two-dimensional Ising model with ran- dom bonds”. In: Physics reports 237.3 (1994), pp. 129–188

  73. [83]

    Exact critical behavior of a random bond two-dimensional Ising model

    R Shankar. “Exact critical behavior of a random bond two-dimensional Ising model”. In: Physical review letters 58.23 (1987), p. 2466

  74. [85]

    Conformal invariance in random cluster models. I. Holo- morphic fermions in the Ising model

    Stanislav Smirnov. “Conformal invariance in random cluster models. I. Holo- morphic fermions in the Ising model”. In: Ann. of Math. (2) 172.2 (2010), pp. 1435–1467. issn: 0003-486X. doi: 10 . 4007 / annals . 2010 . 172 . 1441. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.4007/annals.2010.172.1441

  75. [86]

    Critical percolation in the plane: conformal invariance, Cardy’s formula, scaling limits

    Stanislav Smirnov. “Critical percolation in the plane: conformal invariance, Cardy’s formula, scaling limits”. In:Comptes Rendus de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences- Series I-Mathematics 333.3 (2001), pp. 239–244

  76. [87]

    Towards conformal invariance of 2D lattice models

    Stanislav Smirnov. “Towards conformal invariance of 2D lattice models”. In: In International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. II , pages 1421–1451. Eur. Math. Soc., Z¨ urich(2006)

  77. [88]

    Critical exponents for two-dimensional percolation

    Stanislav Smirnov and Wendelin Werner. “Critical exponents for two-dimensional percolation”. In: arXiv preprint math/0109120 (2001)

  78. [89]

    Statistical mechanics models via the lens of potential theory

    Yijun Wan. “Statistical mechanics models via the lens of potential theory”. PhD thesis. Universit´ e Paris-Saclay, 2022

  79. [90]

    Exact solutions of conformal field theory in two dimen- sions and critical phenomena

    AB Zamolodchikov. “Exact solutions of conformal field theory in two dimen- sions and critical phenomena”. In: Reviews in Mathematical Physics 1.02n03 (1989), pp. 197–234

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.