Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 44 references

A transcendental non-Archimedean Calabi--Yau Theorem with applications to the cscK problem

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that if a compact Kähler manifold is uniformly K-stable for models, then its Kähler class contains exactly one constant scalar curvature metric.

desk verdict Solid NA pluripotential theory, but the bridge from model stability to bK-stability has a gap in the approximation argument, so Theorem A is not established as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.09442 v1 pith:5K7XHOIW submitted 2025-09-11 math.AG math.DG

Pietro Mesquita-Piccione , David Witt Nyström This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath.DG MSC 32Q2632U1514G2253C55
keywords constantscalarcurvatureKählermetricuniformK-stabilitynon-ArchimedeanpluripotentialtheorytropicalanalytificationMonge–AmpèreequationCalabi–Yautheoremvaluativecriteriontranscendentalgeometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that if a compact Kähler manifold with a Kähler class is uniformly K-stable for models—a numerical inequality on all big test configurations—then the class contains exactly one constant scalar curvature (cscK) metric. This was previously known only for projective algebraic manifolds; the new proof works for arbitrary compact Kähler manifolds, where there are no algebraic line bundles to carry the stability condition. The route goes through a non-Archimedean Calabi–Yau theorem: on the tropical analytification of the manifold, the Monge–Ampère operator is a homeomorphism between finite-energy potentials and finite-energy measures. Why care: it removes a major hypothesis from a central sufficiency direction of the conjecture relating canonical metrics to stability, and supplies a computable valuative criterion for the stability condition.

What carries the argument

The central object is the tropical analytification X^na of a compact Kähler manifold, a compact Hausdorff space whose points are semivaluations on coherent ideal sheaves; it replaces the Berkovich space in the non-algebraic setting. On it the paper defines A-psh functions, a non-Archimedean Monge–Ampère operator, and spaces of finite-energy potentials and measures. The load-bearing identities are the Continuity of Envelopes Property and the Orthogonality Property for the envelope P_A(f), which together imply that the Monge–Ampère operator is a homeomorphism between sup-normalized finite-energy potentials and finite-energy probability measures.

What would settle it

The most direct falsifier would be a compact Kähler manifold and Kähler class that is uniformly K-stable for models but has no cscK metric, or two distinct cscK metrics. Concretely, one could check a non-projective complex torus or K3 surface: compute the β-invariant over all divisorial measures for a chosen class; if the infimum of β/E is positive but an a priori estimate shows the Mabuchi functional is unbounded below, the central claim fails. Conversely, a class that fails the β-criterion but is known to admit a cscK metric would also signal a gap.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the transcendental (not necessarily projective) analogue of non-Archimedean pluripotential theory is strong enough to carry the stability-to-existence argument: Theorem A, the existence and uniqueness of a cscK metric under uniform K-stability for models, holds for every compact Kähler manifold and Kähler class. The bridge is an equivalence between uniform K-stability for models and uniform bK-stability, together with a non-Archimedean Calabi–Yau theorem that makes the identification possible by solving Monge–Ampère equations for measures supported on dual complexes and by proving continuity of the solutions. The authors also extract a finitely

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on the validity of the prior transcendental non-Archimedean pluripotential framework for arbitrary compact Kähler manifolds and on the previously established fact that uniform bK-stability produces a unique cscK metric.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Uniform K-stability for models is sufficient for cscK existence in all Kähler classes on all compact Kähler manifolds, not just projective ones.
  • The non-Archimedean Calabi–Yau theorem gives a way to solve Monge–Ampère equations on tropical spaces, showing that finite-energy measures are exactly Monge–Ampère measures of sup-normalized potentials.
  • The valuative criterion reduces the stability condition to checking a β-invariant on divisorial measures, computable from log discrepancies and restricted volumes.
  • The equivalence between the two stability notions shows that geodesic-ray stability is no stronger than model stability in the general Kähler setting.
  • Uniform bK-stability is an open condition in the Kähler class, implying that the set of Kähler classes admitting cscK metrics is open.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors do not state it, but the homeomorphism of the non-Archimedean Monge–Ampère operator likely carries over to weighted or twisted Monge–Ampère equations, giving a non-Archimedean route to other canonical metrics.
  • A testable extension: the β-invariant formula reduces stability checking to finitely many restricted-volume computations for a given finite set of divisors; one could implement this numerically for toric or low-dimensional examples to search for destabilizing measures.
  • The openness of uniform bK-stability in the Kähler class suggests the full set of classes admitting cscK metrics is open; proving this directly would give a transcendental necessity direction the paper does not pursue.
  • If the algebraic necessity of K-stability for cscK existence holds in the transcendental setting, then combining it with Theorem A would complete the conjecture; this implication is not claimed here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops non-Archimedean pluripotential theory for arbitrary compact Kähler manifolds and proves two main theorems. Theorem A asserts that uniform K-stability for models implies the existence and uniqueness of a cscK metric in any Kähler class, extending Chi Li's algebraic theorem to the transcendental setting. Theorem B is a non-Archimedean Calabi–Yau theorem: the Monge–Ampère operator is a homeomorphism between sup-normalized finite-energy potentials and finite-energy measures. The paper also proves continuity of envelopes, orthogonality, a regularity theorem for solutions whose Monge–Ampère measure is supported on a dual complex, and a valuative criterion for K-stability for models with an explicit β-invariant formula. The proof of Theorem A proceeds by proving an equivalence between uniform K-stability for models and uniform bK-stability (Theorem 9.2.1), then invoking [MP24, Theorem A].

Significance. If correct, the paper constitutes a substantial advance: it removes projectivity and rationality assumptions from a central YTD-type implication, and it substantially develops transcendental non-Archimedean pluripotential theory. The envelope continuity, orthogonality, and the non-Archimedean Monge–Ampère theorem are valuable tools beyond the cscK application. The paper is honest about its dependence on the framework of [MP24] and [DXZ23], and it gives to a large extent detailed proofs rather than mere references. However, the bridge theorem (Theorem 9.2.1) contains a specific gap in the approximation argument that is load-bearing for Theorem A; until that gap is repaired, the main theorem is not established as written.

major comments (2)
  1. [§9.2, proof of (3)⇒(2)] The proof asserts: 'Since the dual complex Δ_{X_j} is a subdivision of Δ_X, as valuations they coincide i_{X_j}(Δ_{X_j}) = i_X(Δ_X)⊆X^na.' This is false. For example, let X be the trivial model X×P^1 and let p be a point in the interior of a smooth central-fiber component E. Blow up p and let F be the exceptional divisor. In local coordinates E={x=0}, take y with y(p)=0 transverse to E; then ord_E(y)=0 but ord_F(y)=1, so v_F is not a monomial valuation with respect to the original SNC divisor, hence v_F∉i_X(Δ_X). Therefore the measures μ_j=MA(P_A(f_j)), supported on vertices of Δ_{X_j}, may charge valuations outside i_X(Δ_X). Lemma 7.2.4 only gives convergence of the projected entropies Ent(μ_{j,X}) for a fixed model X, not of the full entropies Ent(μ_j). The claimed convergence M_A(P_A(f_j))→M_A(φ) is thus unjustified. Since Theorem 9.2.1 is the bridge from uniform K-stability for model
  2. [§9.2 / Corollary 9.2.2] The proof of Theorem A relies entirely on the implication (3)⇒(2) in Theorem 9.2.1 and then on [MP24, Theorem A]. Because the approximation step in (3)⇒(2) is not valid as written, the claimed equivalence between uniform K-stability for models and uniform bK-stability is not established. Without this equivalence, Corollary 9.2.2 does not follow. A repair is likely possible, for instance by a more careful choice of approximating measures or by controlling the difference between full and projected entropy for refined dual complexes, but it is not present in the manuscript.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1.3.4] The definition of the dual complex with the condition ∑_{i∈J} w_i b_i ≤1 appears nonstandard: for a single component this gives an interval rather than a vertex. Please clarify the normalization and explicitly identify how the vertices correspond to the divisorial valuations v_{E_i}.
  2. [§5, §1.3.7] Two typos: 'coursest' should be 'coarsest' and 'Propoerties' should be 'Properties'.
  3. [§8.1] The comparison principle is stated as 'the proof is exactly the same' as in the algebraic case and then only sketched. In particular, the step showing that if v_{E_i}∈U then D_1 and G coincide in a neighborhood of E_i is abbreviated. Since Theorem 8.1.1 is used in Corollary 8.1.3 and Theorem 8.2.1, which in turn feed Theorem 9.2.1, a fuller proof or a precise reference with verified hypotheses would be helpful.
  4. [§10.1.1] The use of [DXZ23, Proposition 3.1] is justified by saying its proof 'applies as is' to the transcendental setting. Given that this is a key step in the explicit β-formula, please spell out the necessary hypotheses and the transcendental version of the statement.
  5. [References] References [BJ25] and [DZ25] are listed as 'in preparation'. The discussion in §1.6 should make clear whether any statement from these works is used, rather than merely contextual.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction found; heavy self-citation dependence is real but the central derivation is a genuine reduction to a distinct prior theorem, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's Theorem A is obtained by proving an equivalence (Theorem 9.2.1) between uniform K-stability for models and uniform bK-stability, and then invoking [MP24, Theorem A] that uniform bK-stability implies existence of a unique cscK metric. This is a legitimate reduction to a distinct prior result by the first author: the cited theorem concerns a different stability notion, and the equivalence is not definitionally forced. The paper does not use the conclusion of Theorem A as an input, and no fitted parameter is relabelled as a prediction. The framework from [MP24] (tropical analytification, subgeodesic ray correspondence, entropy approximation) and [Nys24] (restricted volume differentiability) is heavily self-citational, but these are external prior works with stated assumptions that do not include the target theorem; per the reviewing rules, this is real evidence and does not by itself raise the circularity score. I note a likely mathematical gap in the proof of Theorem 9.2.1, (3) implies (2): the text claims 'Since the dual complex Δ_{X_j} is a subdivision of Δ_X, as valuations they coincide i_{X_j}(Δ_{X_j}) = i_X(Δ_X) ⊆ X^na.' This equality of valuation images is not generally true for blow-ups of points in the interior of a component of the central fiber; the exceptional divisor defines a divisorial valuation not monomial with respect to the original SNC divisor. This affects the entropy-convergence step and is a correctness concern, not a circularity concern. Because circularity here would require the conclusion to be equivalent to an input by construction, and no such equivalence is present, the circularity score remains low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical or geometric entities. It uses the tropical analytification X^na, semivaluations, and dual complexes, all defined in prior work (chiefly [MP24]). No free parameters are fitted or introduced; the beta-invariant formula involves only log discrepancies and volumes of divisor classes.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The tropical analytification X^na exists for arbitrary compact Kähler manifolds and has the properties used: compact Hausdorff, dense divisorial points, dual complexes, and the subgeodesic-ray/A-psh correspondence.
    Used throughout the paper, starting in Section 1.3.2 and Section 2.2. This framework is inherited from [MP24] and is not reproved here.
  • domain assumption Differentiability of volumes in divisorial directions (Theorem 2.1.2) and the resulting compatibility of restricted volumes (Corollary 2.1.3) hold for big classes on compact Kähler manifolds.
    Key input for Proposition 4.2.1 (sum of restricted volumes equals V) and for the orthogonality proof. Cited to [Nys24] and [Vu23], both external results.
  • domain assumption Uniform bK-stability implies existence of a unique cscK metric (Theorem 2.4.3).
    This is the final step in the proof of Theorem A via Corollary 9.2.2. It is stated as [MP24, Theorem A], a result of the first author in a separate paper.
  • domain assumption The synthetic pluripotential theory of [BJ23a] (quasi-metrics, J estimates, energy pairing continuity) extends to the transcendental setting.
    Used in Sections 5 and 6 for the strong topology and the non-Archimedean Calabi-Yau theorem. The paper sometimes adapts proofs 'as in [BJ23a]' without a fully detailed extension argument.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A transcendental non-Archimedean Calabi--Yau Theorem with applications to the cscK problem." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5K7XHOIW

@misc{pith2026250909442,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A transcendental non-Archimedean Calabi--Yau Theorem with applications to the cscK problem},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5K7XHOIW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.09442}
}
abstract

Let $X$ be a compact K\"ahler manifold and $\alpha$ a K\"ahler class on $X$. We prove that if $(X,\alpha)$ is uniformly K-stable for models, then there is a unique cscK metric in $\alpha$. This was first proved in the algebraic case by Chi Li, and it strengthens a related result in an article of Mesquita-Piccione. K-stability for models is defined in terms of big test configurations, but we also give a valuative criterion as in the work of Boucksom--Jonsson together with an explicit formula for the associated $\beta$-invariant. To accomplish this we further develop the non-Archimedean pluripotential theory in the transcendental setting, as initiated in the works of Darvas--Xia--Zhang and Mesquita-Piccione. In particular we prove the continuity of envelopes and orthogonality properties, and using that, we are able to extend the non-Archimedean Calabi-Yau Theorem found in an article of Boucksom--Jonsson to the general K\"ahler setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Berman, S \'e bastien Boucksom, Vincent Guedj, and Ahmed Zeriahi

    Robert J. Berman, S \'e bastien Boucksom, Vincent Guedj, and Ahmed Zeriahi. A variational approach to complex Monge - Amp \`e re equations. Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes \'E tud. Sci. , 117:179--245, 2013

    2013

  2. [2]

    Berman, S \'e bastien Boucksom, and Mattias Jonsson

    Robert J. Berman, S \'e bastien Boucksom, and Mattias Jonsson. A variational approach to the Yau - Tian - Donaldson conjecture. J. Am. Math. Soc. , 34(3):605--652, 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    Monge-amp \`e re equations in big cohomology classes

    S \'e bastien Boucksom, Philippe Eyssidieux, Vincent Guedj, and Ahmed Zeriahi. Monge-amp \`e re equations in big cohomology classes. Acta Math. , 205(2):199--262, 2010

    2010

  4. [4]

    Differentiability of volumes of divisors and a problem of Teissier

    S \'e bastien Boucksom, Charles Favre, and Mattias Jonsson. Differentiability of volumes of divisors and a problem of Teissier . J. Algebr. Geom. , 18(2):279--308, 2009

    2009

  5. [5]

    Solution to a non- Archimedean Monge - Amp \`e re equation

    S \'e bastien Boucksom, Charles Favre, and Mattias Jonsson. Solution to a non- Archimedean Monge - Amp \`e re equation. J. Am. Math. Soc. , 28(3):617--667, 2015

    2015

  6. [6]

    Singular semipositive metrics in non- A rchimedean geometry

    S\' e bastien Boucksom, Charles Favre, and Mattias Jonsson. Singular semipositive metrics in non- A rchimedean geometry. J. Algebraic Geom. , 25(1):77--139, 2016

    2016

  7. [7]

    Differentiability of relative volumes over an arbitrary non- Archimedean field

    S \'e bastien Boucksom, Walter Gubler, and Florent Martin. Differentiability of relative volumes over an arbitrary non- Archimedean field. Int. Math. Res. Not. , 2022(8):6214--6242, 2022

    2022

  8. [8]

    A non- Archimedean approach to K -stability, I : Metric geometry of spaces of test configurations and valuations

    S \'e bastien Boucksom and Mattias Jonsson. A non- Archimedean approach to K -stability, I : Metric geometry of spaces of test configurations and valuations. Preprint, arXiv:2107.11221 https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.11221 [math.AG], 2021

    arXiv 2021

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Global pluripotential theory over a trivially valued field

    S\'ebastien Boucksom and Mattias Jonsson. Global pluripotential theory over a trivially valued field. Annales de la Facult\'e des sciences de Toulouse : Math\'ematiques , Ser. 6, 31(3):647--836, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Measures of finite energy in pluripotential theory: a synthetic approach

    Sebastien Boucksom and Mattias Jonsson. Measures of finite energy in pluripotential theory: a synthetic approach . Preprint, arXiv:2307.01697 https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01697 [math.CV], 2023

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A non-Archimedean approach to K-stability, II: Divisorial stability and openness

    Sébastien Boucksom and Mattias Jonsson. A non-Archimedean approach to K-stability, II: Divisorial stability and openness . Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) , 2023(805):1--53, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Non- Archimedean Green 's functions and Zariski decompositions

    S \'e bastien Boucksom and Mattias Jonsson. Non- Archimedean Green 's functions and Zariski decompositions. C. R., Math., Acad. Sci. Paris , 362(S1):5--42, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    On the Yau--Tian--Donaldson conjecture for constant scalar curvature and weighted extremal K\"ahler metrics , 2025

    S\'ebastien Boucksom and Mattias Jonsson. On the Yau--Tian--Donaldson conjecture for constant scalar curvature and weighted extremal K\"ahler metrics , 2025. In preparation

    2025

  6. [14]

    C \^o nes positifs des vari \'e t \'e s complexes compactes

    S \'e bastien Boucksom. C \^o nes positifs des vari \'e t \'e s complexes compactes . Theses, Universit \'e Joseph-Fourier - Grenoble I , December 2002. Jury: Christiaan PETERS (Universit \'e de Grenoble I), Pr \'e sident; Jean-Pierre DEMAILLY (Universit \'e de Grenoble I), Di...

    2002

  7. [15]

    Divisorial Zariski decompositions on compact complex manifolds

    S \'e bastien Boucksom. Divisorial Zariski decompositions on compact complex manifolds. Ann. Sci. \'E c. Norm. Sup \'e r. (4) , 37(1):45--76, 2004

    2004

  8. [16]

    On the constant scalar curvature K \"a hler metrics

    Xiuxiong Chen and Jingrui Cheng. On the constant scalar curvature K \"a hler metrics. I : A priori estimates. J. Am. Math. Soc. , 34(4):909--936, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    On the constant scalar curvature K \"a hler metrics

    Xiuxiong Chen and Jingrui Cheng. On the constant scalar curvature K \"a hler metrics. II : Existence results. J. Am. Math. Soc. , 34(4):937--1009, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    K \"a hler- Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds

    Xiuxiong Chen, Simon Donaldson, and Song Sun. K \"a hler- Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds. I : Approximation of metrics with cone singularities. J. Am. Math. Soc. , 28(1):183--197, 2015

    2015

  11. [19]

    K \"a hler- Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds

    Xiuxiong Chen, Simon Donaldson, and Song Sun. K \"a hler- Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds. II : Limits with cone angle less than \(2 \) . J. Am. Math. Soc. , 28(1):199--234, 2015

    2015

  12. [20]

    K \"a hler- Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds

    Xiuxiong Chen, Simon Donaldson, and Song Sun. K \"a hler- Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds. III : Limits as cone angle approaches \(2 \) and completion of the main proof. J. Am. Math. Soc. , 28(1):235--278, 2015

    2015

  13. [21]

    Collins and Valentino Tosatti

    Tristan C. Collins and Valentino Tosatti. Restricted volumes on K \"a hler manifolds. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse, Math. (6) , 31(3):907--947, 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    The Mabuchi completion of the space of K \"a hler potentials

    Tam \'a s Darvas. The Mabuchi completion of the space of K \"a hler potentials. Am. J. Math. , 139(5):1275--1313, 2017

    2017

  15. [23]

    Geodesic rays and K \"a hler - Ricci trajectories on Fano manifolds

    Tam \'a s Darvas and Weiyong He. Geodesic rays and K \"a hler - Ricci trajectories on Fano manifolds. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. , 369(7):5069--5085, 2017

    2017

  16. [24]

    Valuative stability of polarised varieties

    Ruadha \' Dervan and Eveline Legendre. Valuative stability of polarised varieties. Math. Ann. , 385(1-2):357--391, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    K-stability for K \"a hler manifolds

    Ruadha \' Dervan and Julius Ross. K-stability for K \"a hler manifolds. Math. Res. Lett. , 24(3):689--739, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    A transcendental approach to non-Archimedean metrics of pseudoeffective classes

    Tamás Darvas, Mingchen Xia, and Kewei Zhang. A transcendental approach to non-Archimedean metrics of pseudoeffective classes . Preprint, arXiv:2302.02541 https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02541 [math.AG], 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    A YTD correspondence for constant scalar curvature metrics , 2025

    Tamás Darvas and Kewei Zhang. A YTD correspondence for constant scalar curvature metrics , 2025. In preparation

    2025

  20. [28]

    Restricted volumes and base loci of linear series

    Lawrence Ein, Robert Lazarsfeld, Mircea Musta t a , Michael Nakamaye, and Mihnea Popa. Restricted volumes and base loci of linear series. Am. J. Math. , 131(3):607--651, 2009

    2009

  21. [29]

    A valuative criterion for uniform K -stability of \( Q \) - Fano varieties

    Kento Fujita. A valuative criterion for uniform K -stability of \( Q \) - Fano varieties. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 751:309--338, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Valuations and asymptotic invariants for sequences of ideals

    Mattias Jonsson and Mircea Musta t a . Valuations and asymptotic invariants for sequences of ideals. Annales de l'Institut Fourier , 62(6):2145--2209, 2012

    2012

  23. [31]

    The complex Monge - Amp \`e re equation

    S awomir Ko odziej. The complex Monge - Amp \`e re equation. Acta Math. , 180(1):69--117, 1998

    1998

  24. [32]

    Non-Archimedean Kähler geometry , 2001

    Maxim Kontsevich and Yuri Tschinkel. Non-Archimedean Kähler geometry , 2001. Unpublished

    2001

  25. [33]

    K-semistability is equivariant volume minimization

    Chi Li. K-semistability is equivariant volume minimization. Duke Math. J. , 166(16):3147--3218, 2017

    2017

  26. [34]

    Geodesic rays and stability in the lowercase cscK problem

    Chi Li. Geodesic rays and stability in the lowercase cscK problem. Ann. Sci. \'E c. Norm. Sup \'e r. (4) , 55(6):1529--1574, 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    K-stability and Fujita approximation

    Chi Li. K-stability and Fujita approximation. In Birational geometry, K\"ahler-Einstein metrics and degenerations. Proceedings of the conferences, Moscow, Russia, April 8--13, 2019, Shanghai, China, June 10--14, 2019, Pohang, South Korea, November 18--22, 2019 , pages 545--566...

    2019

  28. [36]

    Non-Archimedean methods for canonical Kähler metrics

    Chi Li. Non-Archimedean methods for canonical Kähler metrics . https://sites.math.rutgers.edu/ cl1412/notes/lecture-merge.pdf, 2023. Minicourse slides

    2023

  29. [37]

    Convex bodies associated to linear series

    Robert Lazarsfeld and Mircea Musta t a . Convex bodies associated to linear series. Ann. Sci. \'E c. Norm. Sup \'e r. (4) , 42(5):783--835, 2009

    2009

  30. [38]

    Special test configuration and \(K\) -stability of Fano varieties

    Chi Li and Chenyang Xu. Special test configuration and \(K\) -stability of Fano varieties. Ann. Math. (2) , 180(1):197--232, 2014

    2014

  31. [39]

    A non-Archimedean theory of complex spaces and the cscK problem

    Pietro Mesquita-Piccione. A non-Archimedean theory of complex spaces and the cscK problem . Preprint, arXiv:2409.06221 https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06221 [math.DG], 2024. To appear in Adv. Math

    2024

  32. [40]

    o m. Deformations of K \

    David Witt Nystr \"o m. Deformations of K \"a hler manifolds to normal bundles and restricted volumes of big classes. J. Differ. Geom. , 128(3):1177--1223, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    K-semistability of cscK manifolds with transcendental cohomology class

    Zakarias Sj \"o str \"o m Dyrefelt. K-semistability of cscK manifolds with transcendental cohomology class. J. Geom. Anal. , 28(4):2927--2960, 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    Derivative of volumes of big cohomology classes

    Duc-Viet Vu. Derivative of volumes of big cohomology classes. Preprint, arXiv:2307.15909 https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15909 [math.AG], 2023

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Calabi's conjecture and some new results in algebraic geometry

    Shing-Tung Yau. Calabi's conjecture and some new results in algebraic geometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 74:1798--1799, 1977

    1977

  36. [44]

    On the Ricci curvature of a compact K \"a hler manifold and the complex Monge - Amp \`e re equation

    Shing-Tung Yau. On the Ricci curvature of a compact K \"a hler manifold and the complex Monge - Amp \`e re equation. I . Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 31:339--411, 1978

    1978

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.