Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Frozen differential scattering in reconfigurable complex media

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A localized perturbation makes the differential scattering matrix of any complex medium rank one, so the change in output wavefront is frozen.

desk verdict Rank-one differential scattering is a clean identity with a useful physical interpretation and solid supporting experiments, but the 'any complex medium' claim outruns the proof, and the paper still deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.09506 v1 pith:DULOCUST submitted 2025-09-11 physics.optics eess.SPphysics.app-ph

Philipp del Hougne This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticseess.SPphysics.app-ph
keywords frozendifferentialscatteringrank-oneperturbationmatrixcomplexmediareconfigurablemetasurfacewavefrontshapingcoherencethermalnoise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a universal property of any wave-scattering system: when the medium is changed at a single point-like spot, the change in the scattered field is always proportional to one fixed output pattern, no matter what wavefront is sent in. The author calls this 'frozen differential scattering' and proves it by showing that a localized perturbation is a rank-one update of the scattering matrix, so the differential scattering matrix has exactly one significant singular value. Because the differential output lies in a single mode, it is perfectly coherent even for incoherent inputs, and the way thermal noise enters the measurement has a low-rank structure that can be managed. The claim is tested in a programmable-metasurface-controlled radio chamber, and then the frozen pattern is 'customized' by optimizing other metasurface elements, including maximizing the signal-to-thermal-noise ratio. If right, this makes differential wavefront measurements robust and offers new ways to filter, stabilize, and communicate through complex media.

What carries the argument

The load-tunable-port description of a programmable metasurface: each meta-atom is a lumped, point-like port terminated by a tunable reflection coefficient, so flipping it is a rank-one update of the full scattering matrix via a matrix-inversion lemma. Singular value decomposition then leaves one dominant left singular vector s1 as the frozen output shape; the scalar coupling encoded in the adjacent matrix entries r1 governs how strongly a given input excites that mode. The optimization adds a second layer: tuning the other meta-atoms changes the effective background scattering matrix, thereby shaping s1 or the signal-to-thermal-noise ratio.

What would settle it

Take a complex medium and a tunable element that is not point-like—e.g., a phase-mask pixel larger than one diffraction-limited resolution cell or a multi-parameter tunable resonator with two independent controls—and measure the differential output for two very different inputs. If the two Δy vectors are not collinear, or if ΔS has two comparable singular values, the rank-one freezing claim fails in that regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a sufficiently localized perturbation of any linear, passive, matched complex medium, the differential scattering matrix ΔS has rank one, regardless of the structure of the full scattering matrix S. Consequently the differential output wavefront Δy = ΔS x is always collinear with a single fixed vector s1, so its shape is frozen: changing the input wavefront only rescales it by a complex scalar. The same holds for the transmission block ΔT, so frozen differential behavior occurs in transmission and reflection alike. The paper proves this algebraically from the multiport-network representation, verifies near-rank-one behavior in experiments with a PIN-diode-contro

Load-bearing premise

The whole proof relies on the changed element being a single tiny, point-like knob with one scalar setting; if the change covers an extended region or has several independent controls, the frozen pattern is lost.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, any differential scattering measurement—optical label-free sensing, coherent change-detection radar, differential detection—inherits a single-mode structure whose output pattern is independent of the input.
  • The differential signal is perfectly coherent even when the input wavefront is fully incoherent, so freezing-aware receivers do not need coherent illumination.
  • Thermal-noise coherence changes caused by the perturbation lie in a low-dimensional span (rank at most two for ΔΓ_th), enabling principled denoising and covert nearly-passive signaling.
  • The frozen mode can be engineered: optimizing other programmable meta-atoms imposes a desired output shape (e.g., one-hot or uniform) or raises the signal-to-thermal-noise ratio (6.3× in the reported experiment).
  • Differential freezing applies to scattering, reflection included, unlike previously known frozen-transmission cases, so the same principle covers radar and backscatter settings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the linear-algebraic mechanism—a rank-one matrix update—is independent of wave type, so acoustical, elastic, or matter-wave systems with a point-like perturbation should exhibit the same frozen differential response.
  • Beyond the paper: the same reasoning suggests that in large programmable arrays, one can precompute each element's frozen response and use it as a basis for fast, model-agnostic wavefront control without full channel estimation.
  • Beyond the paper: because the frozen output mode is set by the background medium, 'customized freezing' could be used to steer a differential signature toward a specific receiver or away from interceptors, which matters for covert communication.
  • Beyond the paper: quantifying how the second singular value grows with the perturbation's electrical size would give a practical design rule for when the rank-one approximation is good enough for a given sensing or communication task.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces and experimentally demonstrates 'frozen differential scattering': in a linear, passive, multiply-scattering medium, changing a single localized (scalar, point-like) parameter produces a rank-one change ΔS of the full scattering matrix, so the differential output wavefront Δy is collinear with a fixed vector s1 independent of the input x. The authors derive this in a multiport-network model for a single tunable load (Sec. 2.2.2), support it with a coupled-dipole derivation and an MPLC update in the SI, and validate it in a programmable-metasurface-stirred reverberation chamber with 8 antennas, 225 meta-atoms, and 250 random configurations. They further analyze coherence purification and thermal-noise emission, and demonstrate 'customized freezing' by optimizing 224 background meta-atom states to shape the frozen differential output mode or to maximize signal-to-thermal-noise ratio.

Significance. The result is conceptually clean and potentially broadly useful. It turns a known algebraic fact (rank-one update of the scattering matrix) into a physically meaningful, testable wavefront phenomenon, extending the 'frozen wavefront' concept from special static media to generic reconfigurable media. The experimental validation uses four metrics (R, P, C, E) and direct wavefront comparisons; the optimized-frozen-mode demonstration (Sec. 5) is a nice addition. If the scope is properly qualified, the paper should be of interest to the optics and microwave communities. The derivation is explicit and the experiments support the claim; no fitted parameters enter the central rank-one argument.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Sec. 2.2.2] The universal phrasing 'for a localized perturbation, the differential scattering matrix of any complex medium has rank one' is stronger than what is derived. The derivation assumes N_S=1 and a lumped (point-like) scalar load ρ (Sec. 2.2.1). If the perturbed object has finite electrical size or multiple independent internal degrees of freedom, it corresponds to several ports/pixels and ΔS is a sum of rank-one terms, generically of higher rank. Please qualify the claim throughout (abstract, intro, Sec. 2.2.2) as 'a perturbation that changes a single scalar degree of freedom' (e.g., a single lumped load or a single MPLC pixel) and explicitly state the multi-rank case.
  2. [SI: MPLC] The MPLC derivation in the SI needs its 'sub-resolution' condition spelled out precisely. A phase-mask pixel is an abstract single control degree of freedom; a physical modification spanning several resolution cells would correspond to multiple pixels and destroy exact rank one. Please state the condition as 'the modified area must correspond to exactly one independent pixel in the discretized model' and note that the rank-one result does not extend to multi-pixel modifications.
  3. [Sec. 4.2] The STNR derivation relies on the independence assumption ⟨n n̂†⟩=0. This is physically reasonable for measurements taken at well-separated times, but it should be stated explicitly, since for simultaneous measurement with common internal noise sources the cross-correlation terms would not vanish and would modify the formula. Please add one sentence justifying the assumption and indicating the regime in which it applies.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.2.2] Please define p, q, and g explicitly before the formula for ΔS, and note that reciprocity gives p=q^T. Currently the notation is introduced somewhat abruptly.
  2. [Sec. 4.2] The coherence result 𝚪out,Δ = (ΔS)𝚪in(ΔS)† assumes the same input realization x is used before and after the perturbation. If independent input realizations are used in the two measurements, the coherence of the difference is not rank one. Please clarify this condition in the text.
  3. [Fig. 3] The aligned phase (blue solid) and raw phase (blue dashed) are visually very different; a sentence explaining why the raw phase is not meaningful for the comparison would improve readability.
  4. [Abstract] The phrase 'perfectly coherent' could be misread as a statement about temporal coherence. Consider saying 'spatially single-mode' or 'rank-one spatial coherence' to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [Sec. 5.2] In the one-hot optimization, two examples are shown; it would be helpful to indicate which output index is targeted in each case, and whether the observation agrees for the other tested targets.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the rank-one differential-scattering result is derived self-containedly, and the experimental checks do not reduce to fitted predictions.

full rationale

The central derivation in Sec. 2.2.2 is a self-contained algebraic consequence of the multiport-network model: with N_S=1, changing the tunable load from rho1 to rho_hat1 enters the global scattering matrix as S_hat = S + p( rho_hat1/(1-rho_hat1 g) - rho1/(1-rho1 g) ) q, which is manifestly a rank-one outer product. The frozen-output statement Delta y = beta(x) s1 then follows by inspection; it is not obtained by fitting any parameter to the data that it purports to predict. In the experiment, Delta S is measured directly, and the near-rank-one property is established from its singular-value spectrum; the collinearity of Delta y with s1 is a mathematical consequence of that measured property, so the empirical content resides in the spectrum itself, not in a circular reuse of the fitted vector. The optimization in Sec. 5 uses the measured s1 or STNR inside the cost function, but it is presented as an inverse-design demonstration rather than as a prediction test, so it is not a fitted-input-called-prediction step. Self-citations (Refs. 31-36) are used for model provenance and to acknowledge prior use of the rank-one algebraic fact, notably in footnote 2; the derivation in this paper does not depend on those citations for its force. The paper also honestly acknowledges the finite-size leakage that makes the rank only approximately one, which is a limitation and not a circular step. Overall, no load-bearing circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is parameter-free: no numbers are fitted to produce the rank-one result. The measured scattering matrices are experimental inputs; θ in the thermal-noise section is the standard temperature/frequency noise scale from prior literature, not fitted here. The optimization uses measured costs rather than fitted model parameters. No new physical entities are postulated; the 'frozen differential output mode' s1 is a derived singular vector of the measured ΔS, not an invented object.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The entire system and each component is linear, static, passive, and all antenna ports are matched, so the static parts are described by an N-port scattering matrix.
    Sec. 2.2.1: 'It is further assumed that all antenna ports are matched, and that the entire system and each of its components is passive and linear.' This underpins the network model used to derive the rank-one update.
  • domain assumption Each tunable element is a lumped (point-like) virtual port terminated by a scalar reflection coefficient rho_i; with one tunable element, changing rho_1 to rho_hat_1 is a rank-one update.
    Sec. 2.2.1: 'The antenna ports and the tunable elements are assumed to be lumped... effectively point-like.' Sec. 2.2.2 sets N_S=1. This is the assumption that makes ΔS exactly rank one.
  • standard math The Sherman-Morrison identity correctly gives the change of W^{-1} when one diagonal entry of W changes.
    SI coupled-dipole derivation: 'According to the Sherman-Morrison identity, Δe = -λ f g^T e_inc.' This is pure linear algebra, no additional physics.
  • domain assumption For a passive isothermal matched multiport, the thermal noise coherence matrix is Gamma_th = θ(I - SS†).
    Sec. 4, citing Refs 46-50. The paper notes this assumes passivity, isothermal equilibrium, and matched ports.
  • ad hoc to paper Thermal noise realizations before and after the perturbation are independent: ⟨n n̂†⟩ = 0.
    Sec. 4.2: 'We assume that the thermal noise realizations before and after the rank-one perturbation of the complex medium are independent.' This is not derived from the noise-wave model and is not experimentally validated; it enters the STNR formula.
  • domain assumption The MPLC analysis assumes scalar, forward-only propagation with no multiple scattering between phase masks.
    SI: 'this model assumes the absence of any multiple scattering, be it within a phase mask or between phase masks.' Used to extend the freezing result to non-point-like phase pixels.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Frozen differential scattering in reconfigurable complex media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DULOCUST

@misc{pith2026250909506,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Frozen differential scattering in reconfigurable complex media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DULOCUST}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.09506}
}
read the original abstract

The sensitivity of transmission to the input wavefront is a hallmark feature of complex media and the basis for wavefront shaping techniques. Yet, intriguing special cases exist in which the output wavefront is "frozen" (agnostic to the input wavefront). This happens when special structure in the complex medium collapses the rank of its transmission matrix to unity. Here, we unveil that an analogous phenomenon exists more universally for differential scattering (including reflection) in reconfigurable complex media. Specifically, for a localized perturbation, the differential scattering matrix of any complex medium has rank one. One consequence is that the differential output signal is perfectly coherent irrespective of the input wavefront's coherence. Moreover, the thermal noise emitted into the frozen differential output mode has a particular structure that can be exploited for thermal noise management. We experimentally evidence frozen differential scattering in a rich-scattering wireless link parametrized by a programmable meta-atom. Then, we demonstrate "customized freezing" by optimizing the configuration of additional programmable meta-atoms that parametrize the wireless link, as envisioned for 6G networks. We impose particular shapes of the frozen differential output mode, and maximize its signal-to-thermal-noise ratio. Potential applications include filtering and stabilization of differential wavefronts, as well as imaging, sensing, and communication in complex media.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09506 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of wavefront freezing phenomena. Left: conventional full-rank transmission where different inputs yield different outputs. Middle: frozen transmission in special static media (Anderson-localized or keyhole), where the output is “frozen” in the same shape no matter the input. Right: locally perturbed complex medium, where the change in output is “frozen” no matter the input. This illustration of differentia… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Multiport-network schematic (left) and photographic image (right) of the experimental setup involving two times four antennas (TX and RX, cross-polarized) and an array of programmable meta-atoms (programmable metasurface, PM). Each meta-atom consists of a static component (its structural scattering) and a point-like tunable lumped element (PIN diode), as shown in the inset. Changing the configuration of a single met… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Experimental observation of frozen differential scattering; an analogous figure for differential transmission is included as Fig. S1. (A) Measured singular value spectra of S (top) and ΔS (bottom). (B) For three distinct input wavefronts (one per row), we display three items. Left column: x in terms of amplitude (green, left axis) and phase (blue, right axis); 𝐶𝑥 = |x † r1|/∥x∥2 ∥r1 ∥2 indicates the overlap of x wit… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental demonstration of customized differential freezing in transmission. (A) Measured dominant singular vector of ΔT for four optimized configurations of the 224 other meta-atoms; the colors are defined in the legend in (C). (B) PDF of the dominant singular valu…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    L., Baranger, H

    Moustakas, A. L., Baranger, H. U., Balents, L., Sengupta, A. M. & Simon, S. H. Communication through a diffusive medium: Coherence and capacity.Science 287, 287–290 (2000)

    2000

  2. [2]

    Cao, H., Mosk, A. P. & Rotter, S. Shaping the propagation of light in complex media.Nat. Phys.18, 994–1007 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    & Genack, A

    Shi, Z. & Genack, A. Z. Transmission eigenvalues and the bare conductance in the crossover to Anderson localization. Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 043901 (2012)

    2012

  4. [4]

    & Genack, A

    Davy, M., Shi, Z. & Genack, A. Z. Focusing through random media: Eigenchannel participation number and intensity correlation. Phys. Rev. B85, 035105 (2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    & Genack, A

    Wang, J. & Genack, A. Z. Transport through modes in random media.Nature 471, 345–348 (2011)

    2011

  6. [6]

    & Chabanov, A

    Peña, A., Girschik, A., Libisch, F., Rotter, S. & Chabanov, A. The single-channel regime of transport through random media. Nat. Commun.5, 3488 (2014)

    2014

  7. [7]

    & Carminati, R

    Leseur, O., Pierrat, R., Sáenz, J. & Carminati, R. Probing two-dimensional Anderson localization without statistics.Phys. Rev. A90, 053827 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Chizhik, D., Foschini, G. J. & Valenzuela, R. A. Capacities of multi-element transmit and receive antennas: Correlations and keyholes.Electron. Lett.36, 1099–1100 (2000)

    2000

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    J., Gans, M

    Chizhik, D., Foschini, G. J., Gans, M. J. & Valenzuela, R. A. Keyholes, correlations, and capacities of multielement transmit and receive antennas.IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.1, 361–368 (2002)

    2002

  2. [10]

    & Molisch, A

    Almers, P., Tufvesson, F. & Molisch, A. F. Measurement of keyhole effect in a wireless multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel.IEEE Commun. Lett.7, 373–375 (2003)

    2003

  3. [11]

    & Molisch, A

    Almers, P., Tufvesson, F. & Molisch, A. F. Keyhole effect in MIMO wireless channels: Measurements and theory.IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.5, 3596–3604 (2006)

    2006

  4. [12]

    & Pagneux, V

    Salemeh, E., Félix, S. & Pagneux, V. Invariance of the speckle pattern of the transmitted wave in periodic waveguides.Sci. Rep. 15, 2504 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    & Pagneux, V

    Salemeh, E., Félix, S. & Pagneux, V. Freezing of the transmitted wave pattern through gratings.Wave Motion103606 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Morizur, J.-F.et al.Programmable unitary spatial mode manipulation.J. Opt. Soc. Am. A27, 2524–2531 (2010). 10/13

    2010

  7. [15]

    C., Lavery, M

    Berkhout, G. C., Lavery, M. P., Courtial, J., Beijersbergen, M. W. & Padgett, M. J. Efficient sorting of orbital angular momentum states of light.Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 153601 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    & Fontaine, N

    Zhang, Y. & Fontaine, N. K. Multi-plane light conversion: a practical tutorial.arXiv:2304.11323(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Photonics 15, 367–373 (2021)

    Zhou, T.et al.Large-scale neuromorphic optoelectronic computing with a reconfigurable diffractive processing unit.Nat. Photonics 15, 367–373 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    & Treps, N

    Boucher, P., Goetschy, A., Sorelli, G., Walschaers, M. & Treps, N. Full characterization of the transmission properties of a multi-plane light converter.Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023226 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Wyatt, P. J. Differential light scattering: a physical method for identifying living bacterial cells.Appl. Opt.7, 1879–1896 (1968)

    1968

  12. [20]

    Wyatt, P. J. Identification of bacteria by differential light scattering.Nature 221, 1257–1258 (1969)

    1969

  13. [21]

    Bustamante, C., Maestre, M. F. & Tinoco Jr, I. Circular intensity differential scattering of light by helical structures. I. Theory. J. Chem. Phys.73, 4273–4281 (1980)

    1980

  14. [22]

    Bustamante, C., Maestre, M. F. & Tinoco Jr, I. Circular intensity differential scattering of light by helical structures. II. Applications. J. Chem. Phys.73, 6046–6055 (1980)

    1980

  15. [23]

    & Maestre, M

    Bustamante, C., Tinoco Jr, I. & Maestre, M. F. Circular differential scattering can be an important part of the circular dichroism of macromolecules.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.80, 3568–3572 (1983)

    1983

  16. [24]

    & Fritz, T

    Forker, R., Gruenewald, M. & Fritz, T. Optical differential reflectance spectroscopy on thin molecular films.Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem., Sect. C: Phys. Chem.108, 34–68 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    D., Wolfe, P

    Cha, M., Phillips, R. D., Wolfe, P. J. & Richmond, C. D. Two-stage change detection for synthetic aperture radar.IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.53, 6547–6560 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    E., Yocky, D

    Wahl, D. E., Yocky, D. A., Jakowatz, C. V. & Simonson, K. M. A new maximum-likelihood change estimator for two-pass SAR coherent change detection.IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.54, 2460–2469 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Monti-Guarnieri, A. V.et al. Coherent change detection for multipass SAR.IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.56, 6811–6822 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    & Alouini, M.-S

    Simon, M. & Alouini, M.-S. A unified approach to the probability of error for noncoherent and differentially coherent modulations over generalized fading channels.IEEE Trans. Commun.46, 1625–1638 (1998)

    1998

  21. [29]

    Miller, D. A. B. Waves, modes, communications, and optics: a tutorial.Adv. Opt. Photonics11, 679–825 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    & Vetterli, M

    Roy, O. & Vetterli, M. The effective rank: A measure of effective dimensionality.Proc. EUSIPCO606–610 (2007)

    2007

  23. [31]

    Ambiguity-aware segmented estimation of mutual coupling in large RIS: Algorithm and experimental validation

    del Hougne, P. Ambiguity-aware segmented estimation of mutual coupling in large RIS: Algorithm and experimental validation. arXiv:2507.22750(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    & del Hougne, P

    Sol, J., Prod’Homme, H., Le Magoarou, L. & del Hougne, P. Experimentally realized physical-model-based frugal wave control in metasurface-programmable complex media.Nat. Commun.15, 2841 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Experimentalmultiport-networkparameterestimationandoptimizationformulti-bitRIS

    delHougne,P. Experimentalmultiport-networkparameterestimationandoptimizationformulti-bitRIS. arXiv:2507.02168 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    & del Hougne, P

    Prod’homme, H. & del Hougne, P. Efficient computation of physics-compliant channel realizations for (rich-scattering) RIS-parametrized radio environments.IEEE Commun. Lett.27, 3375–3379 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    & del Hougne, P

    Sol, J., Le Magoarou, L. & del Hougne, P. Optimal blind focusing on perturbation-inducing targets in sub-unitary complex media. Laser Photonics Rev.19, 2400619 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Virtual VNA: Minimal-ambiguity scattering matrix estimation with a fixed set of “virtual” load-tunable ports

    del Hougne, P. Virtual VNA: Minimal-ambiguity scattering matrix estimation with a fixed set of “virtual” load-tunable ports. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.74, 1–19 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    & del Hougne, P

    Ahmed, I., Davy, M., Prod’homme, H., Besnier, P. & del Hougne, P. Over-the-air emulation of electronically adjustable Rician MIMO channels in a programmable-metasurface-stirred reverberation chamber.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.73, 2104–2119 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    New theory of partial coherence in the space–frequency domain

    Wolf, E. New theory of partial coherence in the space–frequency domain. Part I: Spectra and cross spectra of steady-state sources. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A72, 343–351 (1982)

    1982

  31. [39]

    New theory of partial coherence in the space-frequency domain

    Wolf, E. New theory of partial coherence in the space-frequency domain. Part II: Steady-state fields and higher-order correlations. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A3, 76–85 (1986). 11/13

    1986

  32. [40]

    & Murphy, J

    Withington, S. & Murphy, J. A. Modal analysis of partially coherent submillimeter-wave quasi-optical systems.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.46, 1651–1659 (2002)

    2002

  33. [41]

    Zhang, H., Hsu, C. W. & Miller, O. D. Scattering concentration bounds: brightness theorems for waves.Optica 6, 1321–1327 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    & Miller, D

    Roques-Carmes, C., Fan, S. & Miller, D. A. Measuring, processing, and generating partially coherent light with self-configuring optics.Light. Sci. Appl.13, 260 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    & Fan, S

    Guo, C. & Fan, S. Unitary control of partially coherent waves. I. Absorption.Phys. Rev. B110, 035430 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    & Fan, S

    Guo, C. & Fan, S. Unitary control of partially coherent waves. II. Transmission or reflection.Phys. Rev. B110, 035431 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Harling, M., Stevenson, C., Toussaint, K. C. & Abouraddy, A. F. Optical communications through highly scattering channels using the coherence-rank.APL Photonics10(2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    Nyquist’s and Thevenin’s theorems generalized for nonreciprocal linear networks.J

    Twiss, R. Nyquist’s and Thevenin’s theorems generalized for nonreciprocal linear networks.J. Appl. Phys.26, 599–602 (1955)

    1955

  39. [47]

    On the theory of linear noisy systems.Tech

    Bosma, H. On the theory of linear noisy systems.Tech. Hogeschool Eindh.(1967)

    1967

  40. [48]

    A.Electromagnetic noise and quantum optical measurements(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    Haus, H. A.Electromagnetic noise and quantum optical measurements(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    Wedge, S. W. & Rutledge, D. B. Noise waves and passive linear multiports.IEEE Microw. Guid. Wave Lett.1, 117–119 (1991)

    1991

  42. [50]

    Miller, D. A. B., Zhu, L. & Fan, S. Universal modal radiation laws for all thermal emitters.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 4336–4341 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    R., Hsu, C

    Sweeney, W. R., Hsu, C. W. & Stone, A. D. Theory of reflectionless scattering modes.Phys. Rev. A102, 063511 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    & Liberal, I

    Oña, D., Ortega-Gomez, A., Hernández, O. & Liberal, I. Orthogonal thermal noise and transmission signals: A new coherent perfect absorption’s feature.Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 103801 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Statisticalmultiport-networkmodelingandefficientdiscreteoptimization of RIS.arXiv:2508.01776(2025)

    Hammami,C.,LeMagoarou,L.&delHougne,P. Statisticalmultiport-networkmodelingandefficientdiscreteoptimization of RIS.arXiv:2508.01776(2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Multiple scattering of waves

    Lax, M. Multiple scattering of waves. II. The effective field in dense systems.Phys. Rev.85, 621 (1952)

    1952

  47. [55]

    SOPHIE/STIC & Ondes

    Hager, W. W. Updating the inverse of a matrix.SIAM Rev.31, 221–239 (1989). Acknowledgements This work was supported in part by the ANR France 2030 program (project ANR-22-PEFT-0005), the ANR PRCI program (project ANR-22-CE93-0010), the Rennes Métropole AES program (project “SR...

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.