pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.09786 · v1 · submitted 2025-09-11 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

High-sensitivity molecular spectroscopy of SrOH using magneto-optical trapping

Annika Lunstad , Hiromitsu Sawaoka , Zack Lasner , Abdullah Nasir , Mingda Li , Jack Mango , Rachel Fields , John M. Doyle This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords SrOHmagneto-optical trapmolecular spectroscopyoptical cyclingrepumping transitionsproton-to-electron mass ratioultralight dark matterpolyatomic molecules
0
0 comments X

The pith

A magneto-optical trap identifies two new repumping transitions in SrOH that enable a deeper optical cycle and trap 4.5 times more molecules while mapping mass-ratio-sensitive vibrational states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that a magneto-optical trap can serve as a sensitive tool to locate weak optical transitions in polyatomic molecules. By finding and implementing two new repumping transitions in SrOH, the authors create a deeper optical cycle that traps roughly 32,400 molecules, a clear improvement over prior setups. They also measure the energy difference between two specific vibrational manifolds, establishing the presence of low-frequency rovibrational lines that respond to changes in the proton-to-electron mass ratio. These capabilities matter because polyatomic molecules are expected to offer enhanced sensitivity in searches for physics beyond the Standard Model, including new CP-violating effects and ultralight dark matter. The work shows how the trap itself can accelerate the spectroscopy needed to prepare such molecules for precision measurements.

Core claim

A magneto-optical trap is used to locate weak optical transitions and rovibronic states in SrOH. Two new repumping transitions are identified and added to a deeper optical cycle, yielding 32400(4700) trapped molecules, a 4.5-fold increase over the previous cycle. The energy spacing between the X^{2}Σ^{+}(200) and X^{2}Σ^{+}(03^{1}0) vibrational manifolds is determined, confirming numerous low-frequency rovibrational transitions sensitive to temporal variations of the proton-to-electron mass ratio.

What carries the argument

The magneto-optical trap acting as a spectroscopic probe to detect and close weak repumping transitions within an extended molecular optical cycle.

Load-bearing premise

The measured increase in trapped molecule number is produced by the newly added repumping transitions and not by unrelated changes in laser intensity, loading rates, or other trap parameters.

What would settle it

Repeating the trapping experiment with the same new lasers turned off but all other conditions held fixed, or obtaining an independent spectroscopic measurement of a different energy spacing between the X^{2}Σ^{+}(200) and X^{2}Σ^{+}(03^{1}0) manifolds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09786 by Abdullah Nasir, Annika Lunstad, Hiromitsu Sawaoka, Jack Mango, John M. Doyle, Mingda Li, Rachel Fields, Zack Lasner.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Energy levels used for spectroscopy as well as repumping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spectrosopy data (a) scan over X˜ 2Σ +(0220)–A˜(020; J = 1/2)κ 2Π1/2 , showing both excited state parity components, split by ∼280 MHz. (b) repumper spectroscopy of X˜ 2Σ +(1220)– A˜(020)κ 2Π1/2 at low resolution. Measurable repumping is observed over 4 GHz detuned from the transition, as expected from the long spectroscopic interaction times achieved in the MOT, see Sec. II. (c) a finer scan of the same t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Increase in MOT lifetime with sequentially added [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Full optical cycling scheme. Line thicknesses represent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fluorescence from a decay in SrOH compared to narrow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Diagram of rotational spacings in X˜ 2Σ +(200) and X˜ 2Σ +(0310) using the measured X˜ 2Σ +(0310;N = 1,2) levels. The energy of X˜ 2Σ +(200;N = 0) is defined as zero. Spin rotation and ℓ-doubling are included in the Hamiltonian when appropriate but the spacings are not visible on this scale. Appendix E: Characterization of improved optical cycle With the addition of the X˜ 2Σ +(1200) and X˜ 2Σ +(1220) re￾p… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Extension of the lifetime with lower MOT holding pow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Values for ℓ ′ from measurements of MOT fluorescence with different numbers of lasers in the optical cycle, relative to i = 3, calculated with Equation E5. The line shows the weighted average for ℓ ′ of all 5 measurements with the 2σ uncertainty represented by the shading. The final value of ℓ ′ = 3.4(8)×10−5 is primarily deter￾mined by the last two measurements. A weighted average of all measurements give… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Polyatomic molecules are projected to be powerful tools in searches for physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM), including new CP-violating (CPV) interactions and ultralight dark matter (UDM) particles. Certain degrees of freedom present in polyatomic molecules enhance the sensitivity of these searches, as well as reject systematic errors, but necessitate extensive high-precision spectroscopy to identify pathways for optical cycling and quantum state readout. Here we show how a magneto-optical trap (MOT) can be used to locate weak optical transitions and identify rovibronic states for optical cycling and quantum control. We demonstrate this spectroscopic approach with strontium monohydroxide (SrOH), which is a candidate for both CPV and UDM searches. We identify two new repumping transitions in SrOH and implement them in a deeper optical cycle to achieve 32400(4700) trapped molecules, a 4.5-fold increase over the previous, shallower cycle. In addition, we determine the energy spacing between the $X^{2}\Sigma^{+}(200)$ and $X^{2}\Sigma^{+}(03^10)$ vibrational manifolds of SrOH, confirming the existence of numerous low-frequency rovibrational transitions that are sensitive to temporal variations of the proton-to-electron mass ratio, a predicted effect of the existence of UDM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the application of a magneto-optical trap (MOT) as a tool for high-sensitivity spectroscopy in the polyatomic molecule SrOH. The authors identify two new repumping transitions, incorporate them into a deeper optical cycle, and report achieving 32400(4700) trapped molecules—a 4.5-fold increase relative to prior shallower cycles. They additionally measure the energy spacing between the X^{2}Σ^{+}(200) and X^{2}Σ^{+}(03^{1}0) vibrational manifolds, which they link to the existence of low-frequency rovibrational transitions potentially sensitive to temporal variations of the proton-to-electron mass ratio.

Significance. If the reported increase in trapped population is unambiguously attributable to the new repumpers, the work provides a concrete experimental demonstration of MOT-enabled discovery of weak transitions for improved optical cycling in polyatomic molecules. This is relevant for precision searches for CP violation and ultralight dark matter. The provision of specific quantitative results (trapped number with uncertainty and a measured energy spacing) constitutes a strength, as does the experimental nature of the central claims.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim attributes the 4.5-fold increase to 32400(4700) trapped molecules directly to implementation of the two new repumping transitions in a deeper cycle. This attribution is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit control data (e.g., a parameter table or blocked-repumper run) confirming that laser intensities, detunings, magnetic-field gradient, beam overlap, molecular flux, and detection efficiency remained unchanged between the two configurations. Without such documentation, alternative explanations for the gain cannot be excluded.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Notation] Notation throughout: The vibrational labels X^{2}Σ^{+}(200) and X^{2}Σ^{+}(03^{1}0) would benefit from a short parenthetical definition or citation to standard SrOH spectroscopic conventions on first use, to aid readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the work's significance and for the detailed feedback on the abstract. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim attributes the 4.5-fold increase to 32400(4700) trapped molecules directly to implementation of the two new repumping transitions in a deeper cycle. This attribution is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit control data (e.g., a parameter table or blocked-repumper run) confirming that laser intensities, detunings, magnetic-field gradient, beam overlap, molecular flux, and detection efficiency remained unchanged between the two configurations. Without such documentation, alternative explanations for the gain cannot be excluded.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of unchanged experimental parameters would eliminate ambiguity and strengthen the attribution of the increase to the new repumpers. The original manuscript did not include a dedicated parameter table or blocked-repumper comparison run. In the revised version we will add a table (or supplementary section) listing the key parameters—laser intensities, detunings, magnetic-field gradient, beam overlap, molecular flux, and detection settings—for both the prior and new cycles, together with data acquired with the additional repumpers blocked. This will directly confirm that the 4.5-fold gain arises from the deeper optical cycle. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct experimental measurements

full rationale

The paper presents experimental spectroscopy and MOT trapping results for SrOH, including identification of repumping transitions and measurement of vibrational energy spacings. These are obtained via direct observation of fluorescence, trap populations, and spectral lines rather than any derivation, fitting procedure, or ansatz that reduces to the paper's own inputs by construction. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or renamed empirical patterns appear in the reported chain. The central claims remain externally falsifiable through independent replication of the apparatus and measurements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is primarily experimental and relies on standard atomic physics assumptions rather than new free parameters or invented entities. No ad-hoc fitting parameters are introduced in the abstract to derive the reported numbers.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and selection rules for molecular transitions apply to SrOH.
    Invoked implicitly when assigning the observed lines to repumping transitions and rovibrational states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5789 in / 1348 out tokens · 45411 ms · 2026-05-18T17:09:23.612983+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    DLIF measurements can also reduce the un- certainty of a previously unobserved vibronic state in the ˜X 2Σ+ manifold before attempting high-resolution measure- ments

    DLIF spectroscopy to identify excited vibronic states Ambiguity in observed excited-state vibronic labels is re- moved using dispersed laser-induced fluorescence (DLIF) spectroscopy. DLIF measurements can also reduce the un- certainty of a previously unobserved vibronic state in the ˜X 2Σ+ manifold before attempting high-resolution measure- ments. Before ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Repumping ˜X2Σ+(1200)throughB(02 00) Initially, one potential pathway for repumping ˜X 2Σ+(1200) involved driving it through theBstate with the ˜X 2Σ+(1200)– ˜B2Σ+(0200)transition, since the excited state had already been observed in Ref. [34]. As we scan the frequency of a narrow-band dye laser around the ˜X 2Σ+(1200)– ˜B2Σ+(0200) band at 627 nm, resonan...

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    With all 12 repumpers, the lifetime can be extended to 210(35) ms, beyond the previous best lifetime with 10 repumpers of 99(7.6) ms

    Impact of photon budget on MOT lifetime Data on the MOT lifetimes as a function of MOT light beam power and closure of the optical cycle is consistent with the MOT lifetime continuing to be limited by decays to unad- dressed states. With all 12 repumpers, the lifetime can be extended to 210(35) ms, beyond the previous best lifetime with 10 repumpers of 99...

    work page

  4. [4]

    To calculate the number accu- rately, we use the following process

    Determination of trapped molecule number The MOT fluorescence is directly proportional to the num- ber of trapped molecules,N m. To calculate the number accu- rately, we use the following process. We start by considering the number of counts on the imaging cameraNc =Sγ det,where Sis the sensitivity of the camera at the detection wavelength of 611 nm andγ ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    In previous work [3], uncertainty inN m was dom- inated by the estimate ofN b, derived from measurements of vibronic branching fractions relevant to the optical cycle [39]

    Determining the photon budget As can be seen in Equation E1, the overall computed num- ber of trapped molecules,Nm, depends inversely on the photon budget,N b. In previous work [3], uncertainty inN m was dom- inated by the estimate ofN b, derived from measurements of vibronic branching fractions relevant to the optical cycle [39]. Here, we describe a dire...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Kozyryev, Z

    I. Kozyryev, Z. Lasner, and J. M. Doyle, Phys. Rev. A103, 043313 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Kozyryev and N

    I. Kozyryev and N. R. Hutzler, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 133002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Z. D. Lasner, A. Frenett, H. Sawaoka, L. Anderegg, B. Augen- braun, H. Lampson, M. Li, A. Lunstad, J. Mango, A. Nasir, T. Ono, T. Sakamoto, and J. M. Doyle, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 083401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Anderegg, L

    L. Anderegg, L. W. Cheuk, Y . Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Science365, 1156 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    N. B. Vilas, P. Robichaud, C. Hallas, G. K. Li, L. Anderegg, and J. M. Doyle, Nature628, 282 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    DeMille, Phys

    D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 067901 (2002)

    work page 2002

  12. [12]

    K. K. Ni, T. Rosenband, and D. D. Grimes, Chemical Science 9, 6830 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Sawant, J

    R. Sawant, J. A. Blackmore, P. D. Gregory, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, J. Aldegunde, J. M. Hutson, M. R. Tarbutt, and S. L. Cornish, New J. Phys.22(2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Micheli, G

    A. Micheli, G. K. Brennen, and P. Zoller, Nature Physics2, 341 (2006)

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    A. V . Gorshkov, S. R. Manmana, G. Chen, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and A. M. Rey, Phys. Rev. A84, 033619 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    Kobayashi, A

    J. Kobayashi, A. Ogino, and S. Inouye, Nat. Comm.10(2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Z. Zeng, S. Deng, S. Yang, and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Christakis, J

    L. Christakis, J. S. Rosenberg, R. Raj, S. Chi, A. Morningstar, D. A. Huse, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr, Nature614, 64 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    C. M. Holland, Y . Lu, S. J. Li, C. L. Welsh, and L. W. Cheuk, Phys. Rev. X15(2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Alauze, J

    X. Alauze, J. Lim, M. A. Trigatzis, S. Swarbrick, F. J. Collings, N. J. Fitch, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tarbutt, Quantum Sci. Tech- nol.6(2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    L. R. B. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebretsadkan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, Nature637, 821 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Miller, A

    C. Miller, A. N. Carroll, J. Lin, H. Hirzler, H. Gao, H. Zhou, M. D. Lukin, and J. Ye, Nature633, 332 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    J. J. Burau, P. Aggarwal, K. Mehling, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 193401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    K. Gaul, N. R. Hutzler, P. Yu, A. M. Jayich, M. Iliaš, and A. Borschevsky, Phys. Rev. A109, 042819 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y . Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y . Park, A. Wang, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, Science381, 46 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Andreev, D

    V . Andreev, D. G. Ang, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, 13 Num. repumpers (i) Lasers added ˜ℓi ˜ℓi +ℓ ′ γ=1/ ˜ℓi +ℓ ′ 3 (000), (100), (200) 1.04(4)×10 −3 1.07(4)×10 −3 933(35) 5 . . . ,(010;N=1,2) 6.03(36)×10 −4 6.4(4)×10 −4 1522(82) 7 . . . ,(02 0 0),(02 2 0) 2.22(29)×10 −4 2.56(30)×10 −4 4603(226) 8 . . . ,(300) 1.52(27)×10 −4 1.86(28)×10 −4 6509...

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    B. L. Augenbraun, Z. D. Lasner, A. Frenett, H. Sawaoka, C. Miller, T. C. Steimle, and J. M. Doyle, New J. Phys.22, 022003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Y . Hao, P. Navrátil, E. B. Norrgard, M. Iliaš, E. Eliav, R. G. Timmermans, V . V . Flambaum, and A. Borschevsky, Phys. Rev. A102(2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    T. A. Isaev, S. Hoekstra, and R. Berger, Phys. Rev. A82, 052521 (2010)

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    Hanneke, B

    D. Hanneke, B. Kuzhan, and A. Lunstad, Quantum Sci. Tech- nol.6, 014005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    E. G. M. Ferreira, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review29, 7 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Prehn, M

    A. Prehn, M. Ibrügger, R. Glöckner, G. Rempe, and M. Zep- penfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    L. R. Liu, J. D. Hood, Y . Yu, J. T. Zhang, N. R. Hutzler, T. Rosenband, and K.-K. Ni, Science360, 900 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    T. K. Langin, V . Jorapur, Y . Zhu, Q. Wang, and D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [36]

    For the repumping transitions driven in this work, the light was produced by a Ti:Sapph laser with a wavelengths of∼700- 712 nm and intensity ofI∼900 mW/cm 2

    work page

  36. [37]

    When populating states ˜X2Σ+(120,20) via cycling on a diagonal line to deplete (transitions (A) and (A’) in Figure 1), homebuilt ECDLs were used

    The light is generated by a continuous-wave 899 Coherent Ring dye laser with Rhodamine 640 as the gain medium pumped by 10 W of 532 nm light. When populating states ˜X2Σ+(120,20) via cycling on a diagonal line to deplete (transitions (A) and (A’) in Figure 1), homebuilt ECDLs were used

    work page

  37. [38]

    P. I. Presunka and J. A. Coxon, J. Chem. Phys.101, 201 (1994)

    work page 1994

  38. [39]

    Presunka and J

    P. Presunka and J. Coxon, Can. J. Chem.71, 1689 (1993)

    work page 1993

  39. [40]

    D. A. Fletcher, M. A. Anderson, W. L. Barclay, and L. M. Zi- urys, J. Chem. Phys.102, 4334 (1995)

    work page 1995

  40. [41]

    P. I. Presunka and J. A. Coxon, Chem. Phys.190, 97 (1995)

    work page 1995

  41. [42]

    Brazier and P

    C. Brazier and P. Bernath, J. Mol. Spectrosc.114, 163 (1985)

    work page 1985

  42. [43]

    Nakagawa, R

    J. Nakagawa, R. F. Wormsbecher, and D. O. Harris, J. Mol. Spectrosc.97, 37 (1983)

    work page 1983

  43. [44]

    Lasner, A

    Z. Lasner, A. Lunstad, C. Zhang, L. Cheng, and J. M. Doyle, Phys. Rev. A106, L020801 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [45]

    Sawaoka, A

    C. Hallas, G. K. Li, N. B. Vilas, P. Robichaud, L. Anderegg, and J. M. Doyle, (2024), arXiv:2509.01618 [Atomic Physics]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [46]

    G. K. Li, C. Hallas, and J. M. Doyle, New J. Phys.27(2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [47]

    Kozyryev, L

    I. Kozyryev, L. Baum, K. Matsuda, B. L. Augenbraun, L. An- deregg, A. P. Sedlack, and J. M. Doyle, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [48]

    Li and J

    M. Li and J. A. Coxon, J. Chem. Phys.104, 4961 (1996)

    work page 1996

  48. [49]

    Ferrari, P

    G. Ferrari, P. Cancio, R. Drullinger, G. Giusfredi, N. Poli, M. Prevedelli, C. Toninelli, and G. M. Tino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(2003)

    work page 2003

  49. [50]

    Shore, Analytic rwa solutions with loss, inThe Theory of Coherent Atomic Excitation, V ol

    B. Shore, Analytic rwa solutions with loss, inThe Theory of Coherent Atomic Excitation, V ol. 1 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1990)

    work page 1990

  50. [51]

    H. J. Williams, S. Truppe, M. Hambach, L. Caldwell, N. J. Fitch, E. A. Hinds, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tarbutt, New J. Phys. 19(2017)

    work page 2017