Superstructure Optimization with Embedded Neural Networks for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production

Alexander Klimek; Caroline Ganzer; Christoph Plate; Kai Sundmacher; Sebastian Sager

arxiv: 2509.09796 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-11 · 💻 cs.CE

Superstructure Optimization with Embedded Neural Networks for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production

Alexander Klimek , Christoph Plate , Sebastian Sager , Kai Sundmacher , Caroline Ganzer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CE

keywords sustainable aviation fuelsuperstructure optimizationneural network embeddingFischer-Tropsch synthesisbiomass gasificationautothermal reformingcarbon emission constraintsmixed-integer optimization

0 comments

The pith

Embedding neural networks as surrogates in superstructure optimization identifies hybrid ATR-biomass pathways as the lowest-cost option for zero-emission sustainable aviation fuel.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a mixed-integer optimization model that places trained neural networks directly inside the superstructure so the solver can choose process units and simultaneously adjust their continuous operating parameters. This embedding lets the model track how input and output stream compositions change with conditions, something fixed algebraic models cannot do. A reader would care because the results map out concrete trade-offs: fossil autothermal reforming is cheapest with no emission rules, yet strict limits push the design toward biomass gasification and direct air capture, with hybrids reaching the lowest cost at the zero-emission boundary. The work also shows that letting the optimizer adapt reactor pressure and gasification temperature through the networks produces noticeably lower costs than holding those values fixed.

Core claim

The central claim is that embedding artificial neural network surrogates within a mixed-integer quadratically constrained program captures variable stream compositions and permits joint optimization of discrete superstructure choices and continuous operating conditions for Fischer-Tropsch kerosene production. Under unconstrained emissions the fossil autothermal reforming route dominates on cost; tightening carbon limits requires biomass gasification and direct air capture with sequestration; at the zero-emission limit hybrid ATR-biomass configurations achieve the lowest cost of roughly 2.38 dollars per kilogram, followed by biomass-only at 2.43 dollars per kilogram, while ATR with DAC-CS is

What carries the argument

Embedded artificial neural network surrogates inside the MIQCP superstructure formulation that represent variable stream compositions and enable simultaneous discrete unit selection and continuous parameter tuning.

If this is right

Unconstrained optimization selects only the fossil autothermal reforming route.
Emission constraints force inclusion of biomass gasification and direct air capture with carbon sequestration.
Hybrid ATR plus biomass gasification reaches the lowest cost of approximately 2.38 dollars per kilogram at zero net emissions.
Biomass gasification alone follows at 2.43 dollars per kilogram and outperforms ATR with DAC-CS at 2.65 dollars per kilogram.
Allowing operating conditions to adapt through the embedded networks produces up to 20 percent lower cost than fixed operating setups.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same embedding approach could be applied to methanol-to-jet or other synthesis routes to test whether hybrid benefits generalize beyond Fischer-Tropsch.
Periodic retraining of the surrogates on fresh plant data could maintain accuracy as real equipment drifts from the original simulation basis.
Regional biomass availability maps could be added to the superstructure to identify location-specific optimal designs rather than a single global configuration.

Load-bearing premise

The neural network surrogates trained on process simulation data accurately represent variable stream compositions and process behavior across the full range of operating conditions and emission constraints explored in the optimization.

What would settle it

Construct a pilot-scale hybrid ATR-biomass facility at the reported optimal conditions and measure whether the realized production cost and net emissions fall within a few percent of the model's predictions.

read the original abstract

This study presents a multi-objective optimization framework for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production, integrating artificial neural networks (ANNs) within a mixed-integer quadratically constrained programming (MIQCP) formulation. By embedding data-driven surrogate models into the mathematical optimization structure, the proposed methodology addresses key limitations of conventional superstructure-based approaches, enabling simultaneous optimization of discrete process choices and continuous operating parameters. The framework captures variable input and output stream compositions, facilitating the joint optimization of target product composition and system design. Application to Fischer-Tropsch (FT) kerosene production demonstrates that cost-minimizing configurations under unconstrained CO2 emissions are dominated by the fossil-based autothermal reforming (ATR) route. Imposing carbon emission constraints necessitates the integration of biomass gasification and direct air capture coupled with carbon sequestration (DAC-CS), resulting in substantially reduced net emissions but higher production costs. At the zero-emission limit, hybrid configurations combining ATR and biomass gasification achieve the lowest costs (~2.38 \$/kg-kerosene), followed closely by biomass gasification-only (~2.43 \$/kg), both of which outperform the ATR-only pathway with DAC-CS (~2.65 \$/kg). In contrast, DAC-only systems relying exclusively on atmospheric CO2 and water electrolysis are prohibitively expensive (~10.8 \$/kg). The results highlight the critical role of the embedded ANNs: optimal process conditions, such as FT reactor pressure and gasification temperature, adapt to changing circumstances, consistently outperforming fixed setups and achieving up to 20% cost savings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Embedding ANNs in an MIQCP superstructure for SAF production lets operating conditions adapt to emission constraints, but the cost rankings at zero emissions rest on unvalidated surrogates.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper embeds neural network surrogates inside a mixed-integer quadratically constrained program to optimize both discrete process choices and continuous parameters for Fischer-Tropsch kerosene production. At the zero-emission limit the optimizer picks hybrid ATR-biomass gasification routes as cheapest around 2.38 $/kg, ahead of biomass-only and ATR with DAC-CS. The framework handles variable stream compositions, which is a practical step beyond fixed-composition models. What works is the demonstration that optimal FT pressure and gasification temperature shift with tightening emission constraints, delivering the claimed 20 percent savings over fixed setups. That adaptability is the concrete result readers can use. The soft spot is the missing validation for the ANNs themselves. The abstract and results give specific cost numbers and route rankings without reporting training data ranges, cross-validation errors, or accuracy checks at the exact operating points the solver selects under zero-emission constraints. If the networks were trained on limited simulation data, small prediction errors in key units could change which configuration looks best or shrink the reported savings. This is the load-bearing assumption the stress-test note flags, and it is not addressed in the provided summary. The work is aimed at process systems engineers who already use superstructure methods and want an example with surrogate embedding for sustainable fuels. A reader in that niche will get a usable case study even if the numbers need more scrutiny. It deserves peer review because the core modeling approach is grounded and the application is specific enough to be checked. I would send it to referees with a request for detailed surrogate validation and sensitivity checks at the reported optima.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a multi-objective optimization framework for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production that embeds artificial neural network (ANN) surrogates within a mixed-integer quadratically constrained programming (MIQCP) superstructure formulation. This enables joint optimization of discrete process choices (e.g., ATR vs. biomass gasification) and continuous operating parameters (e.g., FT reactor pressure, gasification temperature) while capturing variable stream compositions. Applied to Fischer-Tropsch kerosene, the results indicate that unconstrained emission scenarios favor fossil-based ATR, while zero-emission constraints favor hybrid ATR-biomass configurations at ~2.38 $/kg-kerosene (outperforming biomass-only at ~2.43 $/kg and ATR+DAC-CS at ~2.65 $/kg), with adaptive conditions yielding up to 20% cost savings over fixed setups.

Significance. If the embedded ANN surrogates prove accurate, the work offers a meaningful advance in superstructure optimization by overcoming fixed-composition limitations of conventional approaches and providing quantitative cost rankings for SAF pathways under emission constraints. The concrete demonstration of adaptive parameter optimization (e.g., pressure and temperature adjustments) and the reported savings represent a strength for process systems engineering in sustainable fuels.

major comments (1)

[ANN surrogate development and embedding (methods/results sections describing model training and optimization)] The manuscript provides no validation metrics (e.g., RMSE, R², or cross-validation scores), training data description, or error analysis for the ANN surrogates. This is load-bearing for the central claims because the zero-emission cost rankings (~2.38 $/kg hybrid vs. ~2.43 $/kg biomass-only) and the 20% savings from adaptive conditions rest on the surrogates correctly predicting outputs, compositions, and economics at the jointly optimized discrete/continuous points under tightening constraints.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that ANNs 'capture variable input and output stream compositions' but does not clarify how composition variability is encoded in the MIQCP constraints or objective.
[Results (cost comparison figures/tables)] Consider reporting sensitivity of the reported costs to small perturbations in ANN predictions to quantify robustness of the pathway rankings.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and recommendation for major revision. The comment on ANN surrogate validation raises an important point about supporting the optimization results, and we address it directly below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The manuscript provides no validation metrics (e.g., RMSE, R², or cross-validation scores), training data description, or error analysis for the ANN surrogates. This is load-bearing for the central claims because the zero-emission cost rankings (~2.38 $/kg hybrid vs. ~2.43 $/kg biomass-only) and the 20% savings from adaptive conditions rest on the surrogates correctly predicting outputs, compositions, and economics at the jointly optimized discrete/continuous points under tightening constraints.

Authors: We agree that explicit validation metrics, training data details, and error analysis are necessary to substantiate the surrogate-based optimization results. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection in the Methods section that describes the training data generation from detailed process simulations (including variable ranges for pressures, temperatures, and feed compositions), the ANN architecture and training procedure (including data splitting and hyperparameter selection), and quantitative performance metrics such as RMSE, R², and k-fold cross-validation scores on held-out test data. We will also include a brief error-propagation study showing how surrogate prediction uncertainties affect the reported cost rankings and the 20% savings from adaptive operation. These additions will directly address the load-bearing nature of the surrogates for the zero-emission scenarios. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: optimization outputs independent of surrogate training inputs

full rationale

The paper trains ANNs on process simulation data as surrogates and embeds them in an MIQCP superstructure optimization to minimize costs under emission constraints. The reported cost rankings at the zero-emission limit (hybrid ATR+biomass at ~2.38 $/kg, biomass-only at ~2.43 $/kg, ATR+DAC-CS at ~2.65 $/kg) are outputs of this joint discrete-continuous optimization, not re-statements or direct reductions of the ANN training targets. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation; the surrogates approximate external simulation behavior rather than defining the results tautologically. The framework remains self-contained as the optimizer can select operating points (FT pressure, gasification temperature) outside the original training set.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract was available; therefore the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The framework rests on the existence of sufficiently accurate process simulation data for training the surrogates and on the assumption that the chosen superstructure captures all relevant process alternatives.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5817 in / 1338 out tokens · 50639 ms · 2026-05-18T17:04:52.174098+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

embedding of ANNs into the optimization problem to model nonlinear process behavior... application to FT-based SAF production
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

At the zero-emission limit, hybrid configurations... ~2.38 $/kg-kerosene

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

[1]

Renewable methanol production: Optimization- based design, scheduling and waste-heat utilization with the FluxMax approach

T. Svitnič and K. Sundmacher. “Renewable methanol production: Optimization- based design, scheduling and waste-heat utilization with the FluxMax approach”. In: Applied Energy326 (2022), p. 120017.issn: 0306-2619. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy. 2022.120017

work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy 2022
[2]

A multi-scale energy systems engineering approach towards integrated multi-product network optimization

C. D. Demirhan, W. W. Tso, J. B. Powell, and E. N. Pistikopoulos. “A multi-scale energy systems engineering approach towards integrated multi-product network optimization”. In:Applied Energy 281 (2021), p. 116020. issn: 0306-2619. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116020

work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116020 2021
[3]

Renewable hydrogen and ammonia for com- bined heat and power systems in remote locations: Optimal design and scheduling

M. J. Palys, I. Mitrai, and P. Daoutidis. “Renewable hydrogen and ammonia for com- bined heat and power systems in remote locations: Optimal design and scheduling”. In: Optimal Control Applications and Methods(2021), pp. 1–20.issn: 0143-2087. doi: 10.1002/oca.2793

work page doi:10.1002/oca.2793 2021
[4]

Comparative as- sessment of blue hydrogen from steam methane reforming, autothermal reforming, and natural gas decomposition technologies for natural gas-producing regions

A. O. Oni, K. Anaya, T. Giwa, G. Di Lullo, and A. Kumar. “Comparative as- sessment of blue hydrogen from steam methane reforming, autothermal reforming, and natural gas decomposition technologies for natural gas-producing regions”. In: Energy Conversion and Management254 (2022), p. 115245.issn: 0196-8904. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115245

work page doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115245 2022
[5]

Simulation and assessment of an integrated acid gas removal process with higherCO2 capture rate

X. Liu, S. Yang, Z. Hu, and Y. Qian. “Simulation and assessment of an integrated acid gas removal process with higherCO2 capture rate”. In:Computers & Chemical Engineering 83 (2015), pp. 48–57.issn: 0098-1354. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng. 2015.01.008

work page doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng 2015
[6]

Optimal design of a sector- coupled renewable methanol production amid political goals and expected conflicts: Costs vs. land use

T. Svitnič, K. Beer, K. Sundmacher, and M. Böcher. “Optimal design of a sector- coupled renewable methanol production amid political goals and expected conflicts: Costs vs. land use”. In:Sustainable Production and Consumption44 (2024), pp. 123–

work page 2024
[7]

doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2023.12.003

issn: 23525509. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2023.12.003

work page doi:10.1016/j.spc.2023.12.003 2023
[8]

Unravelling the potential of sustainable aviation fuels to decarbonise the aviation sector

A. Gonzalez-Garay, C. Heuberger-Austin, X. Fu, M. Klokkenburg, D. Zhang, A. van der Made, and N. Shah. “Unravelling the potential of sustainable aviation fuels to decarbonise the aviation sector”. In:Energy & Environmental Science15.8 (2022), pp. 3291–3309.issn: 1754-5692. doi: 10.1039/D1EE03437E. References 43

work page doi:10.1039/d1ee03437e 2022
[9]

Biogas Reforming as a Precursor for Integrated Algae Biorefineries: Simulation and Techno-Economic Analysis

P. Kenkel, T. Wassermann, and E. Zondervan. “Biogas Reforming as a Precursor for Integrated Algae Biorefineries: Simulation and Techno-Economic Analysis”. In: Processes9.8 (2021), p. 1348.issn: 2227-9717. doi: 10.3390/pr9081348

work page doi:10.3390/pr9081348 2021
[10]

Process Integration of an Autothermal Reforming Hydrogen Production System with Cryogenic Air Separation and Car- bon Dioxide Capture Using Liquefied Natural Gas Cold Energy

J. Kim, J. Park, M. Qi, I. Lee, and I. Moon. “Process Integration of an Autothermal Reforming Hydrogen Production System with Cryogenic Air Separation and Car- bon Dioxide Capture Using Liquefied Natural Gas Cold Energy”. In:Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research60.19 (2021), pp. 7257–7274.issn: 0888-5885. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c06265

work page doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c06265 2021
[11]

Modeling design and control problems in- volving neural network surrogates

D. Yang, P. Balaprakash, and S. Leyffer. “Modeling design and control problems in- volving neural network surrogates”. In:Computational Optimization and Applications 83.3 (2022), pp. 759–800.doi: 10.1007/s10589-022-00404-9

work page doi:10.1007/s10589-022-00404-9 2022
[12]

A comparative assessment framework for sustain- able production of fuels and chemicals explicitly accounting for intermittency

C. Ganzer and N. Mac Dowell. “A comparative assessment framework for sustain- able production of fuels and chemicals explicitly accounting for intermittency”. In: Sustainable Energy & Fuels4.8 (2020), pp. 3888–3903.issn: 2398-4902. doi: 10.1039/C9SE01239G

work page doi:10.1039/c9se01239g 2020
[13]

Ammonia, 4. Green Ammonia Production

K. H. R. Rouwenhorst, P. M. Krzywda, N. E. Benes, G. Mul, and L. Lefferts. “Ammonia, 4. Green Ammonia Production”. In:Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 7. edition, release 2015. Weinheim and Wiley online library: Wiley-VCH, 2010, pp. 1–20.isbn: 3527306730. doi: 10.1002/14356007.w02_w02

work page doi:10.1002/14356007.w02_w02 2015
[14]

Achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emission plastics by a circular carbon economy

R. Meys, A. Kätelhön, M. Bachmann, B. Winter, C. Zibunas, S. Suh, and A. Bardow. “Achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emission plastics by a circular carbon economy”. In: Science 374.6563 (2021), pp. 71–76.doi: 10.1126/science.abg9853

work page doi:10.1126/science.abg9853 2021
[15]

Calorific values of Miscanthus x giganteus biomass cultivated under suboptimal conditions in marginal soils

D.Nebeská,J.Trögl,D.Žofková,A.Voslařová,J.Štojdl,andV.Pidlisnyuk.“Calorific values of Miscanthus x giganteus biomass cultivated under suboptimal conditions in marginal soils”. In:Studia Oecologica13.1 (2020), pp. 61–67.issn: 1802-212X. doi: 10.21062/ujep/429.2020/a/1802-212x/so/13/1/61

work page doi:10.21062/ujep/429.2020/a/1802-212x/so/13/1/61 2020
[16]

24.10.2025

Trading Economics.EU Natural Gas TTF - Price - Chart - Historical Data - News. 24.10.2025. url: https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eu-natural-gas

work page 2025
[17]

Natural gas and BECCS: A comparative analysis of alternative configurations for negative emissions power generation

C. Cumicheo, N. Mac Dowell, and N. Shah. “Natural gas and BECCS: A comparative analysis of alternative configurations for negative emissions power generation”. In: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control90 (2019), p. 102798.issn: 1750-

work page 2019
[18]

doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102798

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102798 2019
[19]

An overview of the chemical composition of biomass

S. V. Vassilev, D. Baxter, L. K. Andersen, and C. G. Vassileva. “An overview of the chemical composition of biomass”. In:Fuel 89.5 (2010), pp. 913–933.issn: 0016-2361. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022. References 44

work page doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022 2010
[20]

Sustainable ammonia production through process synthesis and global optimization

C. D. Demirhan, W. W. Tso, J. B. Powell, and E. N. Pistikopoulos. “Sustainable ammonia production through process synthesis and global optimization”. In:AIChE Journal 65.7 (2019), e16498.doi: 10.1002/aic.16498

work page doi:10.1002/aic.16498 2019
[21]

Hybrid Biomass- and Electricity-Based Kerosene Production-A Techno-Economic Analysis

S. Voß, S. Bube, and M. Kaltschmitt. “Hybrid Biomass- and Electricity-Based Kerosene Production-A Techno-Economic Analysis”. In:Energy & Fuels38.6 (2024), pp. 5263–5278.issn: 0887-0624. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04876

work page doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04876 2024
[22]

24.10.2025

Aspen Technology Inc.Aspen Plus. 24.10.2025. url: https://www.aspentech.com/ en/products/engineering/aspen-plus

work page 2025
[23]

Biomass and Natural Gas to Liquid Transportation Fuels and Olefins (BGTL+C2_C4): Process Synthesis and Global Optimization

O. Onel, A. M. Niziolek, J. A. Elia, R. C. Baliban, and C. A. Floudas. “Biomass and Natural Gas to Liquid Transportation Fuels and Olefins (BGTL+C2_C4): Process Synthesis and Global Optimization”. In:Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research54.1 (2015), pp. 359–385.issn: 0888-5885. doi: 10.1021/ie503979b

work page doi:10.1021/ie503979b 2015
[24]

Production of FT transporta- tion fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential

C. Hamelinck, A. Faaij, H. den Uil, and H. Boerrigter. “Production of FT transporta- tion fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential”. In:Energy 29.11 (2004), pp. 1743–1771.issn: 0360-5442. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.01.002

work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2004.01.002 2004
[25]

de Klerk

A. de Klerk. Fischer–Tropsch Refining. Wiley, 2011. isbn: 9783527326051. doi: 10.1002/9783527635603

work page doi:10.1002/9783527635603 2011
[26]

Keras: Deep Learning for humans

KerasTeam. Keras: Deep Learning for humans. 24.10.2025. url: https://keras. io/

work page 2025

[1] [1]

Renewable methanol production: Optimization- based design, scheduling and waste-heat utilization with the FluxMax approach

T. Svitnič and K. Sundmacher. “Renewable methanol production: Optimization- based design, scheduling and waste-heat utilization with the FluxMax approach”. In: Applied Energy326 (2022), p. 120017.issn: 0306-2619. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy. 2022.120017

work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy 2022

[2] [2]

A multi-scale energy systems engineering approach towards integrated multi-product network optimization

C. D. Demirhan, W. W. Tso, J. B. Powell, and E. N. Pistikopoulos. “A multi-scale energy systems engineering approach towards integrated multi-product network optimization”. In:Applied Energy 281 (2021), p. 116020. issn: 0306-2619. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116020

work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116020 2021

[3] [3]

Renewable hydrogen and ammonia for com- bined heat and power systems in remote locations: Optimal design and scheduling

M. J. Palys, I. Mitrai, and P. Daoutidis. “Renewable hydrogen and ammonia for com- bined heat and power systems in remote locations: Optimal design and scheduling”. In: Optimal Control Applications and Methods(2021), pp. 1–20.issn: 0143-2087. doi: 10.1002/oca.2793

work page doi:10.1002/oca.2793 2021

[4] [4]

Comparative as- sessment of blue hydrogen from steam methane reforming, autothermal reforming, and natural gas decomposition technologies for natural gas-producing regions

A. O. Oni, K. Anaya, T. Giwa, G. Di Lullo, and A. Kumar. “Comparative as- sessment of blue hydrogen from steam methane reforming, autothermal reforming, and natural gas decomposition technologies for natural gas-producing regions”. In: Energy Conversion and Management254 (2022), p. 115245.issn: 0196-8904. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115245

work page doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115245 2022

[5] [5]

Simulation and assessment of an integrated acid gas removal process with higherCO2 capture rate

X. Liu, S. Yang, Z. Hu, and Y. Qian. “Simulation and assessment of an integrated acid gas removal process with higherCO2 capture rate”. In:Computers & Chemical Engineering 83 (2015), pp. 48–57.issn: 0098-1354. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng. 2015.01.008

work page doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng 2015

[6] [6]

Optimal design of a sector- coupled renewable methanol production amid political goals and expected conflicts: Costs vs. land use

T. Svitnič, K. Beer, K. Sundmacher, and M. Böcher. “Optimal design of a sector- coupled renewable methanol production amid political goals and expected conflicts: Costs vs. land use”. In:Sustainable Production and Consumption44 (2024), pp. 123–

work page 2024

[7] [7]

doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2023.12.003

issn: 23525509. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2023.12.003

work page doi:10.1016/j.spc.2023.12.003 2023

[8] [8]

Unravelling the potential of sustainable aviation fuels to decarbonise the aviation sector

A. Gonzalez-Garay, C. Heuberger-Austin, X. Fu, M. Klokkenburg, D. Zhang, A. van der Made, and N. Shah. “Unravelling the potential of sustainable aviation fuels to decarbonise the aviation sector”. In:Energy & Environmental Science15.8 (2022), pp. 3291–3309.issn: 1754-5692. doi: 10.1039/D1EE03437E. References 43

work page doi:10.1039/d1ee03437e 2022

[9] [9]

Biogas Reforming as a Precursor for Integrated Algae Biorefineries: Simulation and Techno-Economic Analysis

P. Kenkel, T. Wassermann, and E. Zondervan. “Biogas Reforming as a Precursor for Integrated Algae Biorefineries: Simulation and Techno-Economic Analysis”. In: Processes9.8 (2021), p. 1348.issn: 2227-9717. doi: 10.3390/pr9081348

work page doi:10.3390/pr9081348 2021

[10] [10]

Process Integration of an Autothermal Reforming Hydrogen Production System with Cryogenic Air Separation and Car- bon Dioxide Capture Using Liquefied Natural Gas Cold Energy

J. Kim, J. Park, M. Qi, I. Lee, and I. Moon. “Process Integration of an Autothermal Reforming Hydrogen Production System with Cryogenic Air Separation and Car- bon Dioxide Capture Using Liquefied Natural Gas Cold Energy”. In:Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research60.19 (2021), pp. 7257–7274.issn: 0888-5885. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c06265

work page doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c06265 2021

[11] [11]

Modeling design and control problems in- volving neural network surrogates

D. Yang, P. Balaprakash, and S. Leyffer. “Modeling design and control problems in- volving neural network surrogates”. In:Computational Optimization and Applications 83.3 (2022), pp. 759–800.doi: 10.1007/s10589-022-00404-9

work page doi:10.1007/s10589-022-00404-9 2022

[12] [12]

A comparative assessment framework for sustain- able production of fuels and chemicals explicitly accounting for intermittency

C. Ganzer and N. Mac Dowell. “A comparative assessment framework for sustain- able production of fuels and chemicals explicitly accounting for intermittency”. In: Sustainable Energy & Fuels4.8 (2020), pp. 3888–3903.issn: 2398-4902. doi: 10.1039/C9SE01239G

work page doi:10.1039/c9se01239g 2020

[13] [13]

Ammonia, 4. Green Ammonia Production

K. H. R. Rouwenhorst, P. M. Krzywda, N. E. Benes, G. Mul, and L. Lefferts. “Ammonia, 4. Green Ammonia Production”. In:Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 7. edition, release 2015. Weinheim and Wiley online library: Wiley-VCH, 2010, pp. 1–20.isbn: 3527306730. doi: 10.1002/14356007.w02_w02

work page doi:10.1002/14356007.w02_w02 2015

[14] [14]

Achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emission plastics by a circular carbon economy

R. Meys, A. Kätelhön, M. Bachmann, B. Winter, C. Zibunas, S. Suh, and A. Bardow. “Achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emission plastics by a circular carbon economy”. In: Science 374.6563 (2021), pp. 71–76.doi: 10.1126/science.abg9853

work page doi:10.1126/science.abg9853 2021

[15] [15]

Calorific values of Miscanthus x giganteus biomass cultivated under suboptimal conditions in marginal soils

D.Nebeská,J.Trögl,D.Žofková,A.Voslařová,J.Štojdl,andV.Pidlisnyuk.“Calorific values of Miscanthus x giganteus biomass cultivated under suboptimal conditions in marginal soils”. In:Studia Oecologica13.1 (2020), pp. 61–67.issn: 1802-212X. doi: 10.21062/ujep/429.2020/a/1802-212x/so/13/1/61

work page doi:10.21062/ujep/429.2020/a/1802-212x/so/13/1/61 2020

[16] [16]

24.10.2025

Trading Economics.EU Natural Gas TTF - Price - Chart - Historical Data - News. 24.10.2025. url: https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eu-natural-gas

work page 2025

[17] [17]

Natural gas and BECCS: A comparative analysis of alternative configurations for negative emissions power generation

C. Cumicheo, N. Mac Dowell, and N. Shah. “Natural gas and BECCS: A comparative analysis of alternative configurations for negative emissions power generation”. In: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control90 (2019), p. 102798.issn: 1750-

work page 2019

[18] [18]

doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102798

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102798 2019

[19] [19]

An overview of the chemical composition of biomass

S. V. Vassilev, D. Baxter, L. K. Andersen, and C. G. Vassileva. “An overview of the chemical composition of biomass”. In:Fuel 89.5 (2010), pp. 913–933.issn: 0016-2361. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022. References 44

work page doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022 2010

[20] [20]

Sustainable ammonia production through process synthesis and global optimization

C. D. Demirhan, W. W. Tso, J. B. Powell, and E. N. Pistikopoulos. “Sustainable ammonia production through process synthesis and global optimization”. In:AIChE Journal 65.7 (2019), e16498.doi: 10.1002/aic.16498

work page doi:10.1002/aic.16498 2019

[21] [21]

Hybrid Biomass- and Electricity-Based Kerosene Production-A Techno-Economic Analysis

S. Voß, S. Bube, and M. Kaltschmitt. “Hybrid Biomass- and Electricity-Based Kerosene Production-A Techno-Economic Analysis”. In:Energy & Fuels38.6 (2024), pp. 5263–5278.issn: 0887-0624. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04876

work page doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04876 2024

[22] [22]

24.10.2025

Aspen Technology Inc.Aspen Plus. 24.10.2025. url: https://www.aspentech.com/ en/products/engineering/aspen-plus

work page 2025

[23] [23]

Biomass and Natural Gas to Liquid Transportation Fuels and Olefins (BGTL+C2_C4): Process Synthesis and Global Optimization

O. Onel, A. M. Niziolek, J. A. Elia, R. C. Baliban, and C. A. Floudas. “Biomass and Natural Gas to Liquid Transportation Fuels and Olefins (BGTL+C2_C4): Process Synthesis and Global Optimization”. In:Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research54.1 (2015), pp. 359–385.issn: 0888-5885. doi: 10.1021/ie503979b

work page doi:10.1021/ie503979b 2015

[24] [24]

Production of FT transporta- tion fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential

C. Hamelinck, A. Faaij, H. den Uil, and H. Boerrigter. “Production of FT transporta- tion fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential”. In:Energy 29.11 (2004), pp. 1743–1771.issn: 0360-5442. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.01.002

work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2004.01.002 2004

[25] [25]

de Klerk

A. de Klerk. Fischer–Tropsch Refining. Wiley, 2011. isbn: 9783527326051. doi: 10.1002/9783527635603

work page doi:10.1002/9783527635603 2011

[26] [26]

Keras: Deep Learning for humans

KerasTeam. Keras: Deep Learning for humans. 24.10.2025. url: https://keras. io/

work page 2025