Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 52 references

Antiferromagnetism and Stripe Channel Order in the $\mathrm{SU}(N)$-Symmetric Two-Channel Kondo Lattice Model

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the half-filled SU(N) two-channel Kondo lattice, strong Kondo coupling with N≥6 spontaneously breaks channel symmetry and forms a stripe phase.

desk verdict First sign-problem-free DQMC for the 2D two-channel Kondo lattice: a genuinely new stripe channel phase for N>=6, with a real but addressable concern about the excluded L=4n sizes. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.12311 v2 pith:F2Y4NOPQ submitted 2025-09-15 cond-mat.str-el

Elyasaf Y. Cohen , Fakher F. Assaad , Snir Gazit This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 71.27.+a75.30.Mb
keywords two-channelKondolatticeSU(N)symmetryantiferromagnetismchannelbreakingstripeorderdeterminantquantumMonteCarlolarge-NsaddlepointFermisurfacereconstruction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper determines the zero-temperature phase diagram of the SU(N)-symmetric two-channel Kondo lattice model on a square lattice at half filling, using sign-problem-free determinant quantum Monte Carlo for N = 2, 4, 6, and 8. It finds that at weak Kondo coupling the localized moments order antiferromagnetically for all N. For N ≥ 6, increasing the Kondo coupling destroys the antiferromagnet and induces spontaneous channel-symmetry breaking, with the hybridization alternating between the two conduction channels in a stripe pattern at wave vector (π,0)/(0,π). The quantum Monte Carlo results are corroborated by a large-N saddle-point analysis that finds the striped hybridization pattern lowest in free energy at low and intermediate coupling. If correct, this establishes unbiased numerical evidence for a stripe-like channel-ordered phase in a two-dimensional two-channel Kondo lattice.

What carries the argument

The central object is the channel-magnetization (dimer) operator M_i^z, which measures the difference in singlet formation between the two conduction channels; its correlation function D(k) at k = (π,0) detects stripe order. On the analytic side, Hubbard-Stratonovich decoupling introduces a complex hybridization field V_{ia}, and comparing static ferrochannel, antiferrochannel, and π-modulated stripe ansätze in the large-N limit identifies the stripe configuration as the free-energy minimum at low and intermediate coupling. The simulations use sign-problem-free determinant quantum Monte Carlo at half filling for even N, combined with finite-size extrapolation along the L = 4n+2 sequence.

What would settle it

Compute the dimer correlation D(k) for L = 22 and L = 26, or reanalyze the excluded sizes L = 4, 8, 12, 16 with a more careful finite-size scaling, and check whether the (0,π) Bragg peak extrapolates to the same nonzero thermodynamic value; if the excluded sequence converges to a different order or to zero, the stripe phase would be a finite-size artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At half filling on the square lattice, the ground state evolves from a Kondo-screened antiferromagnet at small J/t into, for N ≥ 6, a channel-symmetry-broken phase in which one channel preferentially hybridizes with localized moments in a stripe pattern with ordering wave vector (0,π)/(π,0). The stripe order parameter d(k) becomes nonzero above J_c ≈ 1.8t for N = 6 and ≈ 1.3t for N = 8, and the reconstructed Fermi surface shows one-dimensional metallic channels. The stripe order is robust to small explicit channel asymmetry (destabilized only at ΔJ/J ≈ 0.025 for N = 6), and for N = 8 antiferromagnetic and stripe order coexist in the numerically accessible regime.

Load-bearing premise

The thermodynamic-limit stripe order rests on the assumption that only the L = 6, 10, 14, 18 system sizes provide the correct finite-size sequence, and that the shifted dimer Bragg peaks seen at L = 4, 8, 12, 16 are finite-size artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For N ≥ 6 at strong Kondo coupling, the ground state is a stripe channel-ordered metal whose Fermi surface reconstructs into one-dimensional-like bands.
  • The stripe phase persists under small explicit channel asymmetry, indicating it is not merely a fine-tuned consequence of exact SU(2) channel symmetry.
  • The large-N saddle-point analysis predicts a crossover to uniform ferrochannel order at J/t > 3.23, a competition that the numerics do not yet resolve.
  • For N = 2 and 4, no channel symmetry breaking is found in the studied coupling range; antiferromagnetic order persists up to J/t = 8.2.
  • The phase diagram provides a concrete benchmark for two-channel Kondo lattice physics in two dimensions, complementing earlier one-dimensional and infinite-dimensional studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the stripe phase is a strong-coupling counterpart of the RKKY antiferromagnet: channel symmetry breaking absorbs the Kondo energy while the stripe pattern relieves the intersite magnetic competition, and the two phases meet near J_c.
  • If the stripe order survives the thermodynamic limit, the accompanying Goldstone-like meandering of stripe domain walls would realize an electronic smectic in a microscopic model, linking this phase to stripe physics proposed for high-temperature superconductors.
  • The discrepancy between the numerical preference for stripes at large J and the large-N prediction of ferrochannel order above J/t ≈ 3.23 suggests that 1/N corrections or channel fluctuations favor stripes; extending the simulations to larger N or to 1/N-improved saddle points could settle this.
  • Away from half filling, where the sign problem returns, the stability of stripe order under doping remains open; numerical methods without a sign problem, or analytic continuation approaches, could test the phase's robustness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the SU(N)-symmetric two-channel Kondo lattice model on the square lattice at half-filling using sign-problem-free determinant quantum Monte Carlo for N = 2, 4, 6, 8, for system sizes up to L = 18. The authors report antiferromagnetic order for weak Kondo coupling for all N, and, for N >= 6 at sufficiently strong coupling, a channel-symmetry-broken phase characterized by a (pi,0)/(0,pi) stripe dimerization pattern. The numerical results are complemented by a large-N saddle-point analysis comparing ferrochannel, antiferrochannel, and pi-modulated stripe hybridization ansatzes, and by a Fermi-surface reconstruction analysis.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a valuable result: a two-dimensional unbiased numerical demonstration of spontaneous channel symmetry breaking with stripe order in a Kondo lattice, going beyond both large-N and one-dimensional studies. The methodological strengths are substantial: the DQMC approach is sign-problem-free for the model considered, the implementation is benchmarked against exact diagonalization in the single-site limit, and the large-N calculation is parameter-free in the sense that it derives the order parameter from the saddle point. However, the thermodynamic-limit inference for the stripe phase relies on a finite-size-selection assumption that is not fully supported, and the large-N 'corroboration' is partly constructed after the numerical observation. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's main claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplemental Materials, 'Spatial Structure of the Channel Symmetry Breaking' and Fig. S3] The paper excludes system sizes L = 4, 8, 12, 16 from the thermodynamic-limit extrapolation and uses only L = 6, 10, 14, 18, stating that both sequences 'converge in the thermodynamic limit to the same (0,pi) stripe ordering,' but no data or extrapolation for the L = 4n sequence is shown. This is a load-bearing assumption: if the shifted Bragg peaks seen at L = 4n are not finite-size artifacts, the stripe order parameter d((pi,0)) could be overestimated or the true ordering wave vector could be incommensurate. The authors must either provide the L = 4n sequence data and a clear demonstration of convergence to the same (0,pi) ordering, or otherwise rigorously justify the exclusion (e.g., by a finite-size scaling of the peak position and amplitude for both sequences). Without this, the central claim of stripe long-range order is not established.
  2. [Supplemental Materials, 'Large-N analysis'] The large-N calculation is not an independent test of the stripe hypothesis because the ansatz space was chosen based on the QMC results: the text states 'Motivated by our numerical simulations in the main text, we compare the ground-state energies of three specific spatial patterns.' The subsequent agreement is therefore a retrospective fit rather than a falsifiable prediction. This should be stated explicitly and the corroborative value adjusted. In addition, the large-N analysis finds the stripe ansatz lower in energy only for J/t <= 3.23, while the QMC stripe signal is reported at stronger couplings; the ferrochannel state preferred at large J in the large-N limit is 'not observed in our numerical results.' This discrepancy, acknowledged in the text, further weakens the claimed analytical support and should be addressed or explicitly left as an open question.
  3. [Eq. (S16) and Fig. S3/S4] The finite-size scaling uses the ansatz O(L) = O_inf + A1/L^2 + A2/L^4 on a hand-selected sequence of four sizes (6, 10, 14, 18), sometimes omitting the L=6 point or setting A2=0. With only 4 points and up to 3 parameters, the quality of the fit and the stability of O_inf under alternative (e.g., L=4n) sequences, different fit ranges, or different correction exponents should be reported. The claim that L=4n+2 sizes provide a 'nice sequence' is plausible but not quantitatively justified; the sensitivity of the extracted order parameter to these choices affects the phase boundaries and the coexistence claim for N=8.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The text 'diff' appears truncated in the caption: 'stripe channelπ t t J1 J2 c1 c2 f' and 'diff' likely incomplete; please fix.
  2. [Main text, paragraph after Eq. (3)] The statement 'we verified that this ensures that the half-filling constraint in Eq. (2) holds' is supported by Fig. S7, but the text could quote the actual variance values for clarity, especially at larger N where the constraint is less tight.
  3. [Main text, 'Observables'] The definition of D(k,L) for kx != ky as the sum of C4-related configurations should specify whether this sum is normalized and how the 'nearest available momenta' are defined in the supplemental discussion; a reader cannot reproduce the data without this detail.
  4. [Supplemental Materials, Eq. (S15)] The derivation of the order parameter from the derivative with respect to Delta J_a should mention that the derivative is taken at fixed V*; the notation is slightly ambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: QMC results are self-contained; the large-N energy comparison is not fitted to QMC data and the finite-size sequence choice is an extrapolation assumption, not a construction identity.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are supported by sign-problem-free determinant quantum Monte Carlo simulations, which are benchmarked against exact diagonalization in the single-site limit (Supplemental Materials, 'Comparison with exact diagonalization') and checked for Trotter and Uf convergence. The stripe order parameter d(k=(pi,0)) is a direct observable computed from dimer-dimer correlations, and the thermodynamic-limit extrapolation uses a standard finite-size ansatz O(L)=O_inf + A1/L^2 + A2/L^4 with parameters fitted to the simulated sizes; nothing in this procedure defines the order parameter to be nonzero by construction. The large-N saddle-point analysis indeed states its ansatz choices were 'Motivated by our numerical simulations in the main text' (Supplemental Materials, 'Large-N analysis'), so it is not an independent prediction of the stripe pattern from scratch. However, within the chosen three-ansatz family (ferrochannel, antiferrochannel, stripe), the energy minimization is unconstrained and could have favored either of the other patterns; the finding that the stripe configuration has the lowest free energy for J/t <= 3.23 is a genuine calculation, not a fitted input. The paper does not claim the large-N analysis predicted the stripe before seeing the numerics; it presents it as 'complementary' and 'supporting,' which is a standard and non-circular corroboration strategy. The exclusion of L=4,8,12,16 sizes, justified by the statement 'To accelerate convergence, we exclude system sizes L=4,8,12,16, relying solely on L=6,10,14,18,' is an extrapolation assumption about finite-size sequences, not a reduction of the result to its inputs; it may be a correctness risk, but it is not a circularity. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. [39], [40], [44]) are methodological and not load-bearing for the novel phase-diagram claim. No step in the paper's derivation chain exhibits the required reduction to its own inputs, so no circularity is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on one physical parameter choice (Uf/t=4), a sign-problem-free representation, a restricted large-N ansatz space, and a specific finite-size extrapolation sequence. The stripe order itself is an observed numerical phase, not an invented entity in the sense of a new particle or force. The largest burden is the post hoc selection of system sizes for extrapolation.

free parameters (2)
  • Uf/t, on-site repulsion enforcing half-filling = 4
    Chosen by hand (Uf/t=4) and verified to keep the f-occupancy variance small. All phase boundaries are computed at this value; an exact constraint could shift them.
  • Trotter time step epsilon = min(0.1, 0.1/J)
    Numerical control parameter selected to reduce discretization error at large J; convergence is tested but it is not a physical input.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Abrikosov fermion representation with the half-filling constraint n_f=N/2 can be replaced by a finite Hubbard repulsion Uf.
    Invoked in Eq. (2) and the following paragraph; the validity of the finite-Uf replacement is verified only through the occupancy variance shown in the supplement.
  • domain assumption The determinant QMC simulation is sign-problem-free at half-filling for even N.
    Stated in the numerical simulations section and essential for the claim of unbiased exact results; it is a known property of the model but still a domain assumption.
  • domain assumption The large-N saddle point can be restricted to static, spatially uniform-magnitude hybridization fields with three specific patterns.
    The supplement assumes static V_ia and compares ferrochannel, antiferrochannel, and stripe ansatzes selected after seeing the numerics, so the ansatz space itself is an assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The finite-size scaling ansatz O(L)=O_inf + A1/L^2 + A2/L^4 is valid, and only the L=4n+2 sequence should be used for extrapolation.
    The supplement states that sizes L=4,8,12,16 are excluded because the Bragg peak shifts to nearby momenta; this selection is specific to the present analysis and is the main post hoc choice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Antiferromagnetism and Stripe Channel Order in the $\mathrm{SU}(N)$-Symmetric Two-Channel Kondo Lattice Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F2Y4NOPQ

@misc{pith2026250912311,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Antiferromagnetism and Stripe Channel Order in the $\mathrmSU(N)$-Symmetric Two-Channel Kondo Lattice Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F2Y4NOPQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.12311}
}
abstract

We carry out large-scale, sign-problem-free determinant quantum Monte Carlo simulations of the square lattice $\mathrm{SU}(N)$-symmetric two-channel Kondo lattice model at half-filling. We map out the zero-temperature phase diagram for $N = 2, 4, 6$, and $8$, as a function of the Kondo coupling strength. In the weak-coupling regime, we observe antiferromagnetic order of the localized moments. Remarkably, for $N \geq 6$, sufficiently strong Kondo coupling induces spontaneous channel symmetry breaking, forming a stripe dimerization pattern with a wave vector $\boldsymbol{k}=(\pi,0)$ alternating between channels. These findings are supported by a complementary large-$N$ saddle point analysis, which identifies the striped hybridization pattern as the energetically preferred configuration. The spatial symmetry breaking results in an anisotropic Fermi surface reconstruction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.12311 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) A schematic illustration of the 2CKLM, Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Staggered magnetization order parameter of localized moments. (b) Dimer order parameter at momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Ground-state energy per site and flavor, as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The single-particle residue of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    G. R. Stewart, Heavy-fermion systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 755 (1984)

    1984

  2. [2]

    Coleman, Heavy fermions: Electrons at the edge of magnetism, in Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007)

    P. Coleman, Heavy fermions: Electrons at the edge of magnetism, in Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007)

    2007

  3. [3]

    Gegenwart, Q

    P. Gegenwart, Q. Si, and F. Steglich, Quantum criti- cality in heavy-fermion metals, nature physics 4, 186 (2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    G. R. Stewart, Unconventional superconductivity, Ad- vances in Physics 66, 75 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Si, Quantum criticality and the kondo lattice, in Understanding Quantum Phase Transitions , edited by L

    Q. Si, Quantum criticality and the kondo lattice, in Understanding Quantum Phase Transitions , edited by L. Carr (CRC Press, 2010) arXiv:1012.5440

    arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Si and F

    Q. Si and F. Steglich, Heavy fermions and quantum phase transitions, Science 329, 1161 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    Q. Si, J. H. Pixley, E. Nica, S. J. Yamamoto, P. Goswami, R. Yu, and S. Kirchner, Kondo destruc- tion and quantum criticality in kondo lattice systems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 83, 061005 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Senthil, S

    T. Senthil, S. Sachdev, and M. Vojta, Fractionalized fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 216403 (2003)

    2003

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Coleman, 1 N expansion for the kondo lattice, Phys

    P. Coleman, 1 N expansion for the kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. B 28, 5255 (1983)

    1983

  2. [10]

    Doniach, The kondo lattice and weak antiferromag- netism, Physica B+C 91, 231 (1977)

    S. Doniach, The kondo lattice and weak antiferromag- netism, Physica B+C 91, 231 (1977)

    1977

  3. [11]

    Mazza, S

    F. Mazza, S. Biswas, X. Yan, A. Prokofiev, P. Steffens, Q. Si, F. F. Assaad, and S. Paschen, Quantum fisher in- formation in a strange metal, arXiv:2403.12779 (2024), arXiv:2403.12779 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    B. Danu, M. Vojta, F. F. Assaad, and T. Grover, Kondo Breakdown in a Spin-1/2 Chain of Adatoms on a Dirac Semimetal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 206602 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    B. Danu, M. Vojta, T. Grover, and F. F. Assaad, Spin chain on a metallic surface: Dissipation-induced order versus kondo entanglement, Phys. Rev. B106, L161103 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Song and B

    Z.-D. Song and B. A. Bernevig, Magic-angle twisted bi- layer graphene as a topological heavy fermion problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 047601 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    H. Hu, B. A. Bernevig, and A. M. Tsvelik, Kondo lattice model of magic-angle twisted-bilayer graphene: Hund’s rule, local-moment fluctuations, and low-energy effec- tive theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 026502 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Hoshino, J

    S. Hoshino, J. Otsuki, and Y. Kuramoto, Diagonal com- posite order in a two-channel kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 247202 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Zhang, J

    G. Zhang, J. S. Van Dyke, and R. Flint, Cubic hastatic order in the two-channel kondo-heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235143 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    D. L. Cox, Quadrupolar kondo effect in uranium heavy- electron materials?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1240 (1987)

    1987

  11. [19]

    D. Cox, On the resistivity of the two-channel kondo lattice and UBe 13, Physica B: Condensed Matter 223- 224, 453 (1996), proceedings of the International Con- ference on Strongly Correlated Electron Systems

    1996

  12. [20]

    D. L. Cox and M. Jarrell, The two-channel kondo route to non-fermi-liquid metals, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 8, 9825 (1996)

    1996

  13. [21]

    Sakai and S

    A. Sakai and S. Nakatsuji, Kondo effects and multipolar order in the cubic PrTr2Al20 (Tr=Ti, V), Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 80, 063701 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    Tokunaga, H

    Y. Tokunaga, H. Sakai, S. Kambe, A. Sakai, S. Nakat- suji, and H. Harima, Magnetic excitations and c-f hy- bridization effect in PrTi 2Al20 and PrV 2Al20, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085124 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Yoshida, Y

    T. Yoshida, Y. Machida, K. Izawa, Y. Shimada, N. Na- gasawa, T. Onimaru, T. Takabatake, A. Gourgout, A. Pourret, G. Knebel, and J.-P. Brison, Anisotropic B–T phase diagram of non-kramers system PrRh2Zn20, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 86, 044711 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Iwasa, K

    K. Iwasa, K. T. Matsumoto, T. Onimaru, T. Taka- batake, J.-M. Mignot, and A. Gukasov, Evidence for antiferromagnetic-type ordering of f-electron multi- poles in PrIr 2Zn20, Phys. Rev. B 95, 155106 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    See supplemental materials (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Wugalter, Y

    A. Wugalter, Y. Komijani, and P. Coleman, Large- N approach to the two-channel kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. B 101, 075133 (2020). 5

    2020

  19. [27]

    Flint, M

    R. Flint, M. Dzero, and P. Coleman, Heavy electrons and the symplectic symmetry of spin, Nature Physics 4, 643 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Hoshino and Y

    S. Hoshino and Y. Kuramoto, Superconductivity of composite particles in a two-channel kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 167204 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Auerbach and K

    A. Auerbach and K. Levin, Kondo bosons and the kondo lattice: Microscopic basis for the heavy fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 877 (1986)

    1986

  22. [30]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. M. Newns, On the solution of the coqblin-schreiffer hamiltonian by the large-N expansion technique, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics16, 3273 (1983)

    1983

  23. [31]

    Moreno, S

    J. Moreno, S. Qin, P. Coleman, and L. Yu, Two-channel kondo lattice model on a ladder studied by the density- matrix renormalization-group method, Phys. Rev. B 64, 085116 (2001)

    2001

  24. [32]

    Kornjaˇ ca and R

    M. Kornjaˇ ca and R. Flint, Algebraic hastatic order in one-dimensional two-channel kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 026503 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Schauerte, D

    T. Schauerte, D. L. Cox, R. M. Noack, P. G. J. van Dongen, and C. D. Batista, Phase diagram of the two- channel kondo lattice model in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 147201 (2005)

    2005

  26. [34]

    Nourafkan and N

    R. Nourafkan and N. Nafari, Kondo lattice model at half-filling, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20, 255231 (2008)

    2008

  27. [35]

    Inui and Y

    K. Inui and Y. Motome, Channel-selective non-fermi liquid behavior in the two-channel kondo lattice model under a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 102, 155126 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Ge and Y

    Y. Ge and Y. Komijani, Emergent spinon dispersion and symmetry breaking in two-channel kondo lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 077202 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    H. R. Ott, H. Rudigier, Z. Fisk, and J. L. Smith, Ube13: An unconventional actinide superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1595 (1983)

    1983

  30. [38]

    Hoshino, J

    S. Hoshino, J. Otsuki, and Y. Kuramoto, Mott insu- lator in two-channel kondo lattice, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 391, 012155 (2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    F. F. Assaad, Quantum monte carlo simulations of the half-filled two-dimensional kondo lattice model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 796 (1999)

    1999

  32. [40]

    Raczkowski and F

    M. Raczkowski and F. F. Assaad, Phase diagram and dynamics of the SU(N) symmetric kondo lattice model, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013276 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, Indirect exchange cou- pling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction elec- trons, Phys. Rev. 96, 99 (1954)

    1954

  34. [42]

    Jarrell, H

    M. Jarrell, H. Pang, and D. L. Cox, Phase diagram of the two-channel kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1996 (1997)

    1996

  35. [43]

    Gubernatis, N

    J. Gubernatis, N. Kawashima, and P. Werner, Determi- nant method, in Quantum Monte Carlo Methods: Algo- rithms for Lattice Models (Cambridge University Press,

  36. [44]

    F. F. Assaad, M. Bercx, F. Goth, A. G¨ otz, J. S. Hof- mann, E. Huffman, Z. Liu, F. P. Toldin, J. S. E. Portela, and J. Schwab, The ALF (Algorithms for Lat- tice Fermions) project release 2.0. Documentation for the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo code, SciPost Phys. Codebase...

    2022

  37. [45]

    Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    P. Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Trivedi and M

    N. Trivedi and M. Randeria, Deviations from fermi- liquid behavior above Tc in 2D short coherence length superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 312 (1995)

    1995

  39. [47]

    E. Berg, S. Lederer, Y. Schattner, and S. Trebst, Monte carlo studies of quantum critical metals, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 63 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    The AFM order in the c channel sets in at much lower temperatures beyond our numerical resolution

  41. [49]

    V. J. Emery, E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and T. C. Lubensky, Quantum theory of the smectic metal state in stripe phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2160 (2000)

    2000

  42. [50]

    Komijani, A

    Y. Komijani, A. Toth, P. Chandra, and P. Coleman, Order fractionalization (2019), arXiv:1811.11115 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    S. Shao, Y. Ge, and Y. Komijani, Dynamic-rkky in- duced time-reversal symmetry breaking and chiral spin liquids (2024) arXiv:2409.20532 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024

  44. [52]

    Ge and Y

    Y. Ge and Y. Komijani, Dynamic mass generation and topological order in overscreened kondo lattices, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013247 (2024). 6 Supplemental Materials: Antiferromagnetism and Stripe Channel Order in the SU(N )-Symmetric Two-Channel Kondo Lattice Model LARGE-N ANAL YSI...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.