Weak Error Estimates of Ergodic Approximations for Monotone Jump-diffusion SODEs
Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 16:25 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Backward Euler method achieves order-one convergence to invariant measures for monotone SODEs without jumps.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
For monotone jump-diffusion SODEs satisfying a dissipative condition, the stochastic theta method with θ ∈ (1/2,1] is exponentially ergodic. The backward Euler method yields weak error estimates, and in the jump-free case a time-independent bound gives one-order convergence of the numerical invariant measure to the exact one.
What carries the argument
Dissipative condition on the coefficients combined with the implicit theta-method discretization for θ=1, which controls the error in the long-time limit.
If this is right
- The stochastic theta method with θ > 1/2 is exponentially ergodic for the given class of equations.
- Weak error estimates hold for the backward Euler method applied to these SODEs.
- In the absence of jumps, the invariant measures converge at order one as the time step decreases.
- Error bounds remain independent of simulation time for the backward Euler method in the jump-free case.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- These time-independent bounds could support more reliable long-time statistics in simulations of systems where jumps are absent.
- The approach might extend to checking ergodicity preservation in other implicit discretizations under similar monotonicity assumptions.
Load-bearing premise
The coefficients of the SODE satisfy a dissipative condition that ensures monotonicity.
What would settle it
If the weak error between the exact and numerical solutions grows with time instead of staying bounded, or if the convergence rate of invariant measures is observed to be lower than one in numerical tests for jump-free cases.
read the original abstract
We first derive the exponential ergodicity of the stochastic theta method (STM) with $\theta \in (1/2,1]$ for monotone jump-diffusion stochastic ordinary differential equations (SODEs) under a dissipative condition. Then we establish the weak error estimates of the backward Euler method (BEM), corresponding to the STM with $\theta=1$. In particular, the time-independent estimate for the BEM in the jump-free case yields a one-order convergence rate between the exact and numerical invariant measures, answering a question left in {\it Z. Liu and Z. Liu, J. Sci. Comput. (2025) 103:87}.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript derives exponential ergodicity for the stochastic theta method (STM, θ ∈ (1/2,1]) applied to monotone jump-diffusion SODEs under a dissipative condition on the coefficients. It then obtains weak error estimates for the backward Euler method (BEM, θ=1), with the key result being a time-independent weak error bound in the jump-free case that implies a first-order convergence rate between the exact invariant measure μ and the numerical invariant measure μ_h, thereby resolving an open question posed in Liu and Liu (J. Sci. Comput. 2025).
Significance. If the central derivations are correct, the work supplies rigorous, time-uniform weak error control for ergodic approximations of monotone SODEs, which is a useful advance for numerical analysis of long-time behavior in jump-diffusions. The explicit resolution of the prior open question on invariant-measure convergence rates is a clear strength, as is the separation of the ergodicity analysis (for general θ) from the error analysis (specialized to BEM).
major comments (1)
- [Weak error estimates for BEM (around the statement of the time-independent bound)] The passage from the finite-time weak error bound |E[φ(X_t)] − E[φ(Y_t)]| ≤ C h to the time-independent bound |μ(φ) − μ_h(φ)| ≤ C h (jump-free case) requires that the prefactor C remain independent of t. The dissipative/monotonicity condition is used to obtain exponential ergodicity of both the exact process and the BEM separately, but it is not immediately clear that this yields a uniform-in-time Lyapunov control or Gronwall estimate on the difference process that prevents prefactor growth before the contraction takes over. A concrete verification of this uniform control (e.g., via a t-independent moment bound on the error or an explicit comparison of the one-sided Lipschitz and dissipativity constants) is needed to support the headline claim.
minor comments (2)
- Clarify the precise statement of the dissipative condition (one-sided Lipschitz plus growth) and confirm it is identical for both the ergodicity and error sections.
- Add a short remark on how the jump terms are handled in the error analysis versus the pure diffusion case, to make the distinction between the two settings explicit.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address it point by point below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Weak error estimates for BEM (around the statement of the time-independent bound)] The passage from the finite-time weak error bound |E[φ(X_t)] − E[φ(Y_t)]| ≤ C h to the time-independent bound |μ(φ) − μ_h(φ)| ≤ C h (jump-free case) requires that the prefactor C remain independent of t. The dissipative/monotonicity condition is used to obtain exponential ergodicity of both the exact process and the BEM separately, but it is not immediately clear that this yields a uniform-in-time Lyapunov control or Gronwall estimate on the difference process that prevents prefactor growth before the contraction takes over. A concrete verification of this uniform control (e.g., via a t-independent moment bound on the error or an explicit comparison of the one-sided Lipschitz and dissipativity constants) is needed to support the headline claim.
Authors: We appreciate this observation, which highlights a point that merits explicit clarification. In the proof of the finite-time weak error bound (Theorem 4.2), the monotonicity assumption (Assumption 2.1) is used to derive a differential inequality for the error process that includes a dissipative drift term with constant α > 0. Because the one-sided Lipschitz constant satisfies a relation compatible with α (specifically, the effective contraction rate remains negative), the resulting Gronwall estimate yields a prefactor that is bounded independently of t; the bound does not grow before the exponential contraction dominates. We will add a short auxiliary lemma (new Lemma 4.3) that records the t-uniform moment bound on the error and makes the comparison of constants explicit. This lemma will directly justify the passage to the time-independent estimate in Corollary 4.4. The revision will therefore strengthen the presentation without altering the stated results. revision: yes
Circularity Check
Minor self-citation to prior work whose open question is resolved by independent estimates.
specific steps
-
self citation load bearing
[Abstract]
"answering a question left in Z. Liu and Z. Liu, J. Sci. Comput. (2025) 103:87"
The citation frames the contribution as resolving a prior open question from overlapping-author work, but the citation is contextual only; the time-independent weak error estimate and one-order convergence for invariant measures are derived anew in this manuscript and do not reduce to any equation or constant from the cited paper.
full rationale
The manuscript derives exponential ergodicity for the stochastic theta method and weak error bounds for the backward Euler method directly from the dissipative/monotonicity condition on the SODE coefficients. These derivations are presented as self-contained within the current paper. The sole self-citation appears only to identify the open question being answered and does not supply any load-bearing step, fitted parameter, or uniqueness result that the new estimates reduce to by construction. No equation in the provided abstract or context equates a new prediction to a prior fitted quantity or renames an input as output.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Dissipative condition on the drift and diffusion coefficients that guarantees exponential ergodicity of both the continuous and discrete processes.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Cerrai,Second order PDE’s in finite and infinite dimension, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol
S. Cerrai,Second order PDE’s in finite and infinite dimension, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1762, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001, A probabilistic approach. MR 1840644
work page 2001
-
[2]
Z. Chen and S. Gan,Convergence and stability of the backward Euler method for jump- diffusion SDEs with super-linearly growing diffusion and jump coefficients, J. Comput. Appl. Math.363(2020), 350–369. MR 3974743
work page 2020
-
[3]
Z. Chen, S. Gan, and X. Wang,Mean-square approximations of L´ evy noise driven SDEs with super-linearly growing diffusion and jump coefficients, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B24 (2019), no. 8, 4513–4545. MR 3986287
work page 2019
-
[4]
R. Cont and P. Tankov,Financial modelling with jump processes, Chapman & Hall/CRC Financial Mathematics Series, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2004. MR 2042661
work page 2004
-
[5]
G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk,Ergodicity for infinite-dimensional systems, London Mathe- matical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 229, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996. MR 1417491
work page 1996
-
[6]
S. Deng, W. Fei, W. Liu, and X. Mao,The truncated EM method for stochastic differential equations with Poisson jumps, J. Comput. Appl. Math.355(2019), 232–257. MR 3915385
work page 2019
-
[7]
Y. Guo, X. Wang, and Y. Wu,Order-one convergence of the backward Euler method for random periodic solutions of semilinear SDEs, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B30(2025), no. 9, 3222–3242. MR 4893096
work page 2025
-
[8]
I. Gy¨ ongy and N. V. Krylov,On stochastic equations with respect to semimartingales. I, Stochastics4(1980/81), no. 1, 1–21. MR 587426
work page 1980
-
[9]
D. J. Higham and P. E. Kloeden,Strong convergence rates for backward Euler on a class of nonlinear jump-diffusion problems, J. Comput. Appl. Math.205(2007), no. 2, 949–956. MR 2329668
work page 2007
-
[10]
M. Li, C. Huang, and Z. Chen,Compensated projected Euler-Maruyama method for stochastic differential equations with superlinear jumps, Appl. Math. Comput.393(2021), Paper No. 125760, 11. MR 4176960
work page 2021
-
[11]
W. Liu, X. Mao, and Y. Wu,The backward Euler-Maruyama method for invariant measures of stochastic differential equations with super-linear coefficients, Appl. Numer. Math.184 (2023), 137–150. MR 4499301
work page 2023
-
[12]
Z. Liu,Numerical ergodicity of stochastic Allen-Cahn equation driven by multiplicative white noise, Commun. Math. Res.41(2025), no. 1, 30–44. MR 4896563
work page 2025
- [13]
- [14]
-
[15]
J. C. Mattingly, A. M. Stuart, and D. J. Higham,Ergodicity for SDEs and approximations: locally Lipschitz vector fields and degenerate noise, Stochastic Process. Appl.101(2002), no. 2, 185–232. MR 1931266
work page 2002
-
[16]
R. Mikuleviˇ cius and C. Zhang,On the rate of convergence of weak Euler approximation for nondegenerate SDEs driven by L´ evy processes, Stochastic Process. Appl.121(2011), no. 8, 1720–1748. MR 2811021
work page 2011
-
[17]
G. Pag` es and A. Sagna,Weak and strong error analysis of recursive quantization: a general approach with an application to jump diffusions, IMA J. Numer. Anal.41(2021), no. 4, 2668–2707. MR 4328397
work page 2021
-
[18]
C. Pang, X. Wang, and Y. Wu,Linear implicit approximations of invariant measures of semi-linear SDEs with non-globally Lipschitz coefficients, J. Complexity83(2024), Paper No. 101842, 45. MR 4721566
work page 2024
-
[19]
S. Rong,Theory of stochastic differential equations with jumps and applications, Mathemat- ical and Analytical Techniques with Applications to Engineering, Springer, New York, 2005, Mathematical and analytical techniques with applications to engineering. MR 2160585
work page 2005
-
[20]
Y. Wang, Z. Chen, M. Niu, and Y. Niu,Mean-square convergence and stability of compensated stochastic theta methods for jump-diffusion SDEs with super-linearly growing coefficients, Calcolo60(2023), no. 2, Paper No. 30, 32. MR 4589707
work page 2023
-
[21]
X. Wu and X. Wang,Strong convergence rates for long-time approximations of SDEs with non-globally Lipschitz continuous coefficients, arXiv:2406.10582 (2024). 34 ZHIHUI LIU AND XIAOMING WU * Department of Mathematics & National Center for Applied Mathematics Shenzhen (NCAMS) & Shenzhen International Center for Mathematics, Southern University of Science an...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.