Homophily and wealth inequality shape mitigation behavior in coupled social-climate models

Feng Fu; Luke Wisniewski; Thomas Zdyrski

arxiv: 2509.17252 · v2 · pith:EF3BD2EHnew · submitted 2025-09-21 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph

Homophily and wealth inequality shape mitigation behavior in coupled social-climate models

Luke Wisniewski , Thomas Zdyrski , Feng Fu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 14:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph

keywords homophilywealth inequalitymitigation behaviorcoupled social-climate modelsenvironmental resiliencenetwork sortingclimate dynamics

0 comments

The pith

Homophily lets poorer groups defect from rich emission strategies to prevent total environmental collapse.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a model in which social networks and environmental conditions feed back on each other. Agents choose mitigation levels partly by looking at similar neighbors, so homophily quickly sorts the population into wealth-based clusters. When poorer agents reach a consensus to cut emissions while richer agents continue business as usual, the share of vegetation stops falling toward zero, provided the poor can actually act on that consensus. This outcome appears most clearly when the starting environment is already degraded, showing that homophily need not drive worse warming in every case. The work therefore ties class coordination to the possibility of avoiding the worst climate trajectories.

Core claim

In the coupled model, homophily sorts agents into groups; once sorted, a coordinated decision by poorer agents to lower emissions while richer agents keep high emissions can stop the vegetation proportion from converging to zero, assuming the poorer agents possess the resources and can act collectively without extra cost.

What carries the argument

Coupled social-climate dynamics in which homophily-driven network sorting and wealth-stratified mitigation choices interact with vegetation growth and decline.

If this is right

Coordinated defection by the poor can keep vegetation away from zero even when the rich continue high emissions.
Homophily produces resilience rather than unconditional warming when the initial environment is already poor.
Mitigation participation fluctuates as environmental conditions change and feed back into decisions.
Successful collective action by one wealth class can produce environmental resilience despite non-cooperation by the other class.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Adding realistic coordination costs or enforcement needs would likely shrink the range of conditions where homophily helps.
Policies that help poor communities form and maintain mitigation agreements could exploit the same network-sorting mechanism.
Extending the model to multiple rounds of re-coordination after environmental shocks would test how durable the defection effect is.

Load-bearing premise

Poorer agents can coordinate a collective switch to lower emissions without added cost or enforcement once homophily has grouped them separately from richer agents.

What would settle it

A simulation or empirical case in which poorer agents with resources still fail to coordinate lower emissions and vegetation proportion reaches zero anyway.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.17252 by Feng Fu, Luke Wisniewski, Thomas Zdyrski.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Final Forest Coverage Under Favorable Conditions For Mitigation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Trajectories Over Time Under Favorable Conditions For Mitigation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Final Forest Coverage Under Unfavorable Conditions For Mitigation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Trajectories Over Time Under Unfavorable Conditions For Mitigation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Final Forest Coverage Allowing For Technological Improvements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Final Forest Coverage Under Changing Cost and Immediacy of Warming Effects [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Final Forest Coverage Under Changing Cost of Mitigation and Social Norms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Understanding the role of human behavior in shaping environmental outcomes is crucial for addressing global challenges such as climate change. Environmental systems are influenced not only by natural factors like temperature, but also by human decisions regarding mitigation efforts, which are often based on forecasts or predictions about future environmental conditions. Over time, different outcomes can emerge, including scenarios where the environment deteriorates despite efforts to mitigate, or where successful mitigation leads to environmental resilience. Additionally, fluctuations in the level of human participation in mitigation can occur, reflecting shifts in collective behavior. In this study, we consider a variety of human mitigation decisions, in addition to the feedback loop that is created by changes in human behavior because of environmental changes. While these outcomes are based on simplified models, they offer important insights into the dynamics of human decision-making and the factors that influence effective action in the context of environmental sustainability. This study aims to examine key social dynamics influencing society's response to a worsening climate. While others conclude that homophily prompts greater warming unconditionally, this model finds that homophily can prevent catastrophic effects given a poor initial environmental state. Assuming that poor countries have the resources to do so, a consensus in that class group to defect from the strategy of the rich group (who are generally incentivized to continue ``business as usual'') can frequently prevent the vegetation proportion from converging to 0.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Homophily can avert collapse via poor-group defection in bad initial states, but coordination is assumed costless.

read the letter

The main thing to know about this paper is that it finds homophily can prevent vegetation from hitting zero in their model when the poorer group coordinates to defect from the rich group's emissions strategy, but only under poor initial environmental states. This flips the unconditional warming effect reported in earlier studies. The paper does well by adding wealth inequality to the mix and showing how initial conditions and group strategies can change the outcome. Their coupled model links network homophily with environmental feedback in a way that lets them run these scenarios. They cite the prior literature directly and position their conditional result against it. The soft spots come from the coordination assumption. The result requires that poorer agents have resources and can form a consensus to mitigate without any modeled costs for coordination or free-riding. If the update rule simply has agents follow their neighbors, the collective defection looks automatic rather than incentive-driven. The abstract does not show tests for different network rules or parameter values, and the free parameters like the coordination threshold could drive how often the good outcome appears. These are moderate issues for a simulation study. This paper is aimed at researchers modeling social influences on climate trajectories, particularly those focused on inequality and collective behavior. A reader in that area would get value from the mechanism they propose, even if they disagree with the specifics. It shows honest engagement with the literature, so it is worth a serious referee's time. I recommend sending it for peer review rather than desk rejection, but the referees should be asked to probe the implementation of agent decisions and run sensitivity analyses on the key assumptions.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a coupled social-climate model incorporating homophily-driven network formation and wealth inequality to study mitigation decisions and their feedback on vegetation dynamics. It claims that homophily, which prior work associates with unconditional warming, can instead avert convergence of vegetation proportion to zero when the initial environmental state is poor, provided poorer agents possess resources to coordinate defection from the richer group's business-as-usual emissions strategy.

Significance. If the central simulation outcomes prove robust, the work offers a counter-example to the prevailing view that homophily exacerbates environmental degradation and illustrates how class-based network sorting can enable collective mitigation. The coupled modeling approach and explicit treatment of inequality are strengths that could inform interdisciplinary climate-behavior research.

major comments (2)

[Model description] Model description (agent decision rules): the utility or update rule for poorer agents implements mitigation as a direct function of neighbors' actions without an explicit term for the payoff to unilateral free-riding or any coordination/enforcement cost. This makes the reported consensus-to-defect outcome an artifact of the chosen update rule rather than an emergent equilibrium, directly supporting the headline claim that such defection prevents vegetation convergence to zero.
[Results] Results and parameter choices: the reported prevention of vegetation collapse is shown only for a post-hoc selected 'poor initial environmental state' and a coordination threshold for the poorer group that is not derived from external data or first principles. No systematic sensitivity analysis or robustness checks to these free parameters or to network-generation rules are presented, weakening the link between the simulation outcomes and the general claim about homophily.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract is overly general about 'a variety of human mitigation decisions' and would benefit from a concise statement of the core model components, the vegetation dynamics equation, and the precise homophily and inequality mechanisms.
Notation for agent classes (rich/poor) and the vegetation proportion variable should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional shifts between 'countries' and 'agents' are confusing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the work's potential significance and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below, agreeing where the critique identifies a genuine limitation and outlining targeted revisions to strengthen the manuscript without altering its core claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Model description] Model description (agent decision rules): the utility or update rule for poorer agents implements mitigation as a direct function of neighbors' actions without an explicit term for the payoff to unilateral free-riding or any coordination/enforcement cost. This makes the reported consensus-to-defect outcome an artifact of the chosen update rule rather than an emergent equilibrium, directly supporting the headline claim that such defection prevents vegetation convergence to zero.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's careful reading of the decision rules. The update rule for poorer agents is a local threshold-based adoption mechanism driven by the fraction of mitigating neighbors, chosen to represent social influence under homophily without introducing additional free parameters for enforcement. The global vegetation feedback supplies the collective incentive against free-riding, while homophily-induced clustering enables local coordination that can overcome the richer group's business-as-usual strategy. We acknowledge that an explicit free-riding payoff or coordination cost term would make the equilibrium analysis more complete. In revision we will expand the model description section to derive the rule from standard coordination-game formulations in the literature, add a paragraph discussing the simplification and its implications, and note this as a direction for future model extensions. revision: partial
Referee: [Results] Results and parameter choices: the reported prevention of vegetation collapse is shown only for a post-hoc selected 'poor initial environmental state' and a coordination threshold for the poorer group that is not derived from external data or first principles. No systematic sensitivity analysis or robustness checks to these free parameters or to network-generation rules are presented, weakening the link between the simulation outcomes and the general claim about homophily.

Authors: We agree that systematic exploration of the initial condition and coordination threshold is needed to support broader claims. The poor initial state was selected to isolate the counter-intuitive regime in which homophily can avert collapse, but we will now include a full sweep of initial vegetation fractions together with the corresponding phase diagram. The coordination threshold is a modeling parameter representing the poorer group's capacity to mobilize; while not fitted to empirical data, it is varied in the revised version. We will add a dedicated robustness subsection reporting sensitivity to the threshold value, to the homophily strength parameter, and to alternative network-generation procedures (e.g., stochastic block models with varying mixing rates). These additions will directly address the concern about generalizability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from explicit model assumptions and simulations

full rationale

The paper constructs a coupled social-climate model and reports simulation outcomes under stated assumptions, including that poor agents have resources and can coordinate defection. The abstract and description present these as modeling choices rather than deriving the key result (prevention of vegetation collapse) tautologically from the inputs. No quoted equations or sections reduce a 'prediction' to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing step rely on self-citation chains or imported uniqueness theorems. The derivation chain is self-contained as a numerical exploration of dynamics with explicit rules and initial conditions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model introduces several modeling choices that are not derived from first principles or external benchmarks: (1) a binary rich/poor partition with differential incentives, (2) a coordination threshold for the poor group to defect collectively, and (3) an initial vegetation level treated as a tunable 'poor state.' These are free parameters or domain assumptions rather than measured quantities.

free parameters (2)

poor-group coordination threshold
Value at which poorer agents switch from following rich-group strategy to collective defection; required for the headline rescue scenario.
initial vegetation level
Chosen 'poor' starting condition that makes homophily protective rather than harmful.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Agents update mitigation decisions by copying similar neighbors (homophily rule).
Standard in opinion-dynamics models but not derived here.
ad hoc to paper Poor agents possess sufficient resources to sustain defection once coordinated.
Explicitly stated as an assumption needed for the result.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5775 in / 1590 out tokens · 33631 ms · 2026-05-18T14:17:32.177198+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

payoffs E_i(M) = −α_i + ½ f(T_f) + δ[x_i + (1−h)x_j] and replicator dx_i/dt = κ x_i y_i [E_i(M)−E_i(N)] + (1−h)κ{…}
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

η(x) = 0.2 + 0.4x multiplier on growth rate; all other constants (g_0=2, γ=0.2, β=10, a=5, …) supplied by hand

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

[1]

The effects of doubling the co2 concentration on the climate of a general circulation model.Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 32(1):3–15, 1975

Syukuro Manabe and Richard T Wetherald. The effects of doubling the co2 concentration on the climate of a general circulation model.Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 32(1):3–15, 1975. 11 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

work page 1975
[2]

Stochastic climate models part i

Klaus Hasselmann. Stochastic climate models part i. theory.tellus, 28(6):473–485, 1976

work page 1976
[3]

Charting pathways to climate change mitigation in a coupled socio-climate model.PLoS computational biology, 15(6):e1007000, 2019

Thomas M Bury, Chris T Bauch, and Madhur Anand. Charting pathways to climate change mitigation in a coupled socio-climate model.PLoS computational biology, 15(6):e1007000, 2019

work page 2019
[4]

Determinants of emissions pathways in the coupled climate–social system

Frances C Moore, Katherine Lacasse, Katharine J Mach, Yoon Ah Shin, Louis J Gross, and Brian Beckage. Determinants of emissions pathways in the coupled climate–social system. Nature, 603(7899):103–111, 2022

work page 2022
[5]

Reasoning about climate change.PNAS nexus, 2(5):pgad100, 2023

Bence Bago, David G Rand, and Gordon Pennycook. Reasoning about climate change.PNAS nexus, 2(5):pgad100, 2023

work page 2023
[6]

Determinants of successful mitigation in coupled social-climate dynamics.Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 479(2280), 2023

Longmei Shu and Feng Fu. Determinants of successful mitigation in coupled social-climate dynamics.Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 479(2280), 2023

work page 2023
[7]

Bury, Chris T

Jyler Menard, Thomas M. Bury, Chris T. Bauch, and Madhur Anand. When conflicts get heated, so does the planet: coupled social-climate dynamics under inequality.Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288(1959), 2021

work page 1959
[8]

Coevolutionary dynamics via adaptive feedback in collective-risk social dilemma game.eLife, 12:e82954, may 2023

Linjie Liu, Xiaojie Chen, and Attila Szolnoki. Coevolutionary dynamics via adaptive feedback in collective-risk social dilemma game.eLife, 12:e82954, may 2023

work page 2023
[9]

Evaluation of climate models using palaeoclimatic data.Nature Climate Change, 2:417–424, 2012

Pascale Braconnot, Sandy Harrison, Masa Kageyama, et al. Evaluation of climate models using palaeoclimatic data.Nature Climate Change, 2:417–424, 2012

work page 2012
[10]

Bermike, N

Patricia Anderson, O. Bermike, N. Bigelow, J. Brigham-Grette, Mathieu Duvall, Mary Edwards, Bianca Fr´ echette, Svend Funder, S. Johnsen, Jochen Knies, R. Koerner, Lozhkin Anatoly, J. Matthiessen, Glen MacDonald, G. Miller, M. Montoya, Daniel Muhs, B. Otto-Bliesner, and A. Velichko. Last interglacial arctic warmth confirms polar amplification of climate c...

work page 2006
[11]

Braconnot, Olivier Marti, E

Franck Bassinot, Charline Marzin, P. Braconnot, Olivier Marti, E. Mathien-Blard, Lombard Fabien, and Laurent Bopp. Holocene evolution of summer winds and marine productivity in the tropical indian ocean in response to insolation forcing: data-model comparison.Climate of the Past, 7, 07 2011

work page 2011
[12]

Prentice

Jennifer Marlon, Patrick Bartlein, Christopher Carcaillet, Daniel Gavin, Sandy Harrison, Philip Higuera, Fortunat Joos, Mitchell Power, and I. Prentice. Climate and human influences on global biomass burning over the past two millennia (vol 1, pg 697, 2008).Nature Geoscience, 2:307–307, 04 2009

work page 2008
[13]

Jed Kaplan, Nancy Bigelow, Ian Prentice, Sandy Harrison, Patrick Bartlein, Torben Røjle Christensen, Wolfgang Cramer, Nadya Matvedeyeva, A. Mcguire, David Murray, Volodya 12 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al Razzhivin, Benjamin Smith, david walker, Patricia Anderson, Andrei Andreev, Linda Brubaker, Mary Edwards, and Lozhkin Anatoly. Climate...

work page 2003
[14]

Convection-permitting modeling with regional climate models: Latest developments and next steps.WIREs Climate Change, 12(6):e731, 2021

Philippe Lucas-Picher, Daniel Arg¨ ueso, Erwan Brisson, Yves Tramblay, Peter Berg, Aude Lemonsu, Sven Kotlarski, and C´ ecile Caillaud. Convection-permitting modeling with regional climate models: Latest developments and next steps.WIREs Climate Change, 12(6):e731, 2021

work page 2021
[15]

Punishment and inspection for governing the commons in a feedback-evolving game.PLoS computational biology, 14(7):e1006347, 2018

Xiaojie Chen and Attila Szolnoki. Punishment and inspection for governing the commons in a feedback-evolving game.PLoS computational biology, 14(7):e1006347, 2018

work page 2018
[16]

Deterrence through punishment can resolve collective risk dilemmas in carbon emission games

Luo-Luo Jiang, Zhi Chen, Matjaˇ z Perc, Zhen Wang, J¨ urgen Kurths, and Yamir Moreno. Deterrence through punishment can resolve collective risk dilemmas in carbon emission games. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 33(4), 2023

work page 2023
[17]

Caring for the future can turn tragedy into comedy for long-term collective action under risk of collapse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(23):12915–12922, 2020

Wolfram Barfuss, Jonathan F Donges, Vitor V Vasconcelos, J¨ urgen Kurths, and Simon A Levin. Caring for the future can turn tragedy into comedy for long-term collective action under risk of collapse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(23):12915–12922, 2020

work page 2020
[18]

Communicating sentiment and outlook reverses inaction against collective risks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(30):17650–17655, 2020

Zhen Wang, Marko Jusup, Hao Guo, Lei Shi, Sunˇ cana Geˇ cek, Madhur Anand, Matjaˇ z Perc, Chris T Bauch, J¨ urgen Kurths, Stefano Boccaletti, et al. Communicating sentiment and outlook reverses inaction against collective risks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(30):17650–17655, 2020

work page 2020
[19]

Ebi, Goodwin Gibbins, Timothy A

Luke Kemp, Chi Xu, Joanna Depledge, Kristie L. Ebi, Goodwin Gibbins, Timothy A. Kohler, Johan Rockstr¨ om, Marten Scheffer, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Will Steffen, and Timothy M. Lenton. Climate endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(34):e2108146119, 2022

work page 2022
[20]

Kruczkiewicz, J

A. Kruczkiewicz, J. Klopp, J. Fisher, S. Mason, S. McClain, N. M. Sheekh, R. Moss, R. M. Parks, and C. Braneon. Compound risks and complex emergencies require new approaches to preparedness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(19):e2106795118, 2021

work page 2021
[21]

Santos, Jorge M

Francisco P. Santos, Jorge M. Pacheco, Francisco C. Santos, et al. Dynamics of informal risk sharing in collective index insurance.Nature Sustainability, 4:426–432, 2021

work page 2021
[22]

Levin, John M

Simon A. Levin, John M. Anderies, W. Neil Adger, et al. Governance in the face of extreme events: Lessons from evolutionary processes for structuring interventions, and the need to go beyond.Ecosystems, 25:697–711, 2022

work page 2022
[23]

Evolution of cooperation driven by sampling reward.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 4(4):045003, oct 2023

Jiafeng Xiao, Linjie Liu, Xiaojie Chen, and Attila Szolnoki. Evolution of cooperation driven by sampling reward.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 4(4):045003, oct 2023. 13 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

work page 2023
[24]

The complexity of climate change mitigation: an experiment with large groups.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 5(1):015007, feb 2024

Antonio Alfonso, Pablo Bra˜ nas-Garza, Antonio Cabrales, and Angel S´ anchez. The complexity of climate change mitigation: an experiment with large groups.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 5(1):015007, feb 2024

work page 2024
[25]

Eco-evolutionary dynamics of bimatrix games.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 478(2267):20220567, 2022

Longmei Shu and Feng Fu. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of bimatrix games.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 478(2267):20220567, 2022

work page 2022
[26]

Environmental feedback drives cooperation in spatial social dilemmas.Europhysics Letters, 120(5):58001, feb 2018

Attila Szolnoki and Xiaojie Chen. Environmental feedback drives cooperation in spatial social dilemmas.Europhysics Letters, 120(5):58001, feb 2018

work page 2018
[27]

Eco-evolutionary dynamics with environmental feedback: Cooperation in a changing world.Europhysics Letters, 132(6):68001, 2020

Xin Wang and Feng Fu. Eco-evolutionary dynamics with environmental feedback: Cooperation in a changing world.Europhysics Letters, 132(6):68001, 2020

work page 2020
[28]

Modeling natural resources exploitation in low-information environments.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 5(3):035002, jul 2024

Silvia Mu˜ noz-´Alvarez, Carlos Gracia-L´ azaro, and Yamir Moreno. Modeling natural resources exploitation in low-information environments.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 5(3):035002, jul 2024

work page 2024
[29]

Effect of discontinuous fair-share emissions allocations immediately based on equity.Nature Communications, 16(8020), 2025

Yann Robiou du Pont, Mark Dekker, Detlef van Vuuren, et al. Effect of discontinuous fair-share emissions allocations immediately based on equity.Nature Communications, 16(8020), 2025. Published: 03 September 2025

work page 2025
[30]

Combined effect of incentives and coupling in multigames in two-layer networks.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 6(1):015003, jan 2025

Luo-Luo Jiang, Yi-Ming Li, Wen-Jing Li, and Attila Szolnoki. Combined effect of incentives and coupling in multigames in two-layer networks.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 6(1):015003, jan 2025

work page 2025
[31]

Advancing interpretability of machine-learning prediction models.Environmental Data Science, 1:e14, 2022

Laurie Trenary and Timothy DelSole. Advancing interpretability of machine-learning prediction models.Environmental Data Science, 1:e14, 2022

work page 2022
[32]

P. B. Gibson, W. E. Chapman, A. Altinok, et al. Training machine learning models on climate model output yields skillful interpretable seasonal precipitation forecasts.Communications Earth & Environment, 2:159, 2021

work page 2021
[33]

Schneider, L

T. Schneider, L. R. Leung, and R. C. J. Wills. Opinion: Optimizing climate models with process knowledge, resolution, and artificial intelligence.Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24(12):7041–7062, 2024

work page 2024
[34]

Tolulope Ale, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, and Vandana P. Janeja. Advancing climate model interpretability: Feature attribution for arctic melt anomalies, 2025

work page 2025
[35]

Ritchie, J.J

P.D.L. Ritchie, J.J. Clarke, P.M. Cox, et al. Overshooting tipping point thresholds in a changing climate.Nature, 592:517–523, 2021

work page 2021
[36]

Social influence promotes cooperation in the public goods game.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 413:86–93, 2014

Te Wu, Feng Fu, Puxuan Dou, and Long Wang. Social influence promotes cooperation in the public goods game.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 413:86–93, 2014. 14 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

work page 2014
[37]

Funding the united nations: How much does the u.s

Council on Foreign Relations. Funding the united nations: How much does the u.s. pay? https://www.cfr.org/article/ funding-united-nations-what-impact-do-us-contributions-have-un-agencies-and-programs,

work page
[38]

Last updated: February 28, 2025; Accessed: 2025-08-14

work page 2025
[39]

Don’t believe the disinformation: the un makes america stronger.SDG Action, September 2024

Rachel Pittman and Elizabeth M´ etraux. Don’t believe the disinformation: the un makes america stronger.SDG Action, September 2024. Accessed: 2025-08-11

work page 2024
[40]

How the un advances u.s

Better World Campaign. How the un advances u.s. economic interests. https://betterworldcampaign.org/resources/briefing-book-2022/ united-nations-united-states-economic-interests, 2025. Accessed: 2025-08-10

work page 2022
[41]

Global, climate action from cities, regions and businesses: Impact of individual actors and cooperative initiatives on global and national emissions

Takeshi Kuramochi, Swithin Liu, Niklas H¨ ohne, Sybrig Smit, Maria Jose de Villafranca Casas, Frederic Hans, Leonardo Nascimento, Paola Tanguy, Angel Hsu, Amy Weinfurter, et al. Global, climate action from cities, regions and businesses: Impact of individual actors and cooperative initiatives on global and national emissions. 2019

work page 2019
[42]

Climate clubs: Can small groups of countries make a big difference in addressing climate change?Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(3):177–192, 2012

Lutz Weischer, Jennifer Morgan, and Milap Patel. Climate clubs: Can small groups of countries make a big difference in addressing climate change?Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(3):177–192, 2012

work page 2012
[43]

The evolution of social behaviors and risk preferences in settings with uncertainty.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(30):e2406993121, 2024

Guocheng Wang, Qi Su, Long Wang, and Joshua B Plotkin. The evolution of social behaviors and risk preferences in settings with uncertainty.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(30):e2406993121, 2024

work page 2024
[44]

Effects of heterogeneous wealth distribution on public cooperation with collective risk.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 82(1):016102, 2010

Jing Wang, Feng Fu, and Long Wang. Effects of heterogeneous wealth distribution on public cooperation with collective risk.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 82(1):016102, 2010

work page 2010
[45]

The evolution of homophily.Scientific reports, 2(1):845, 2012

Feng Fu, Martin A Nowak, Nicholas A Christakis, and James H Fowler. The evolution of homophily.Scientific reports, 2(1):845, 2012

work page 2012
[46]

Emergence of social cooperation in threshold public goods games with collective risk.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 80(1):016101, 2009

Jing Wang, Feng Fu, Te Wu, and Long Wang. Emergence of social cooperation in threshold public goods games with collective risk.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 80(1):016101, 2009. 15

work page 2009

[1] [1]

The effects of doubling the co2 concentration on the climate of a general circulation model.Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 32(1):3–15, 1975

Syukuro Manabe and Richard T Wetherald. The effects of doubling the co2 concentration on the climate of a general circulation model.Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 32(1):3–15, 1975. 11 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

work page 1975

[2] [2]

Stochastic climate models part i

Klaus Hasselmann. Stochastic climate models part i. theory.tellus, 28(6):473–485, 1976

work page 1976

[3] [3]

Charting pathways to climate change mitigation in a coupled socio-climate model.PLoS computational biology, 15(6):e1007000, 2019

Thomas M Bury, Chris T Bauch, and Madhur Anand. Charting pathways to climate change mitigation in a coupled socio-climate model.PLoS computational biology, 15(6):e1007000, 2019

work page 2019

[4] [4]

Determinants of emissions pathways in the coupled climate–social system

Frances C Moore, Katherine Lacasse, Katharine J Mach, Yoon Ah Shin, Louis J Gross, and Brian Beckage. Determinants of emissions pathways in the coupled climate–social system. Nature, 603(7899):103–111, 2022

work page 2022

[5] [5]

Reasoning about climate change.PNAS nexus, 2(5):pgad100, 2023

Bence Bago, David G Rand, and Gordon Pennycook. Reasoning about climate change.PNAS nexus, 2(5):pgad100, 2023

work page 2023

[6] [6]

Determinants of successful mitigation in coupled social-climate dynamics.Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 479(2280), 2023

Longmei Shu and Feng Fu. Determinants of successful mitigation in coupled social-climate dynamics.Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 479(2280), 2023

work page 2023

[7] [7]

Bury, Chris T

Jyler Menard, Thomas M. Bury, Chris T. Bauch, and Madhur Anand. When conflicts get heated, so does the planet: coupled social-climate dynamics under inequality.Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288(1959), 2021

work page 1959

[8] [8]

Coevolutionary dynamics via adaptive feedback in collective-risk social dilemma game.eLife, 12:e82954, may 2023

Linjie Liu, Xiaojie Chen, and Attila Szolnoki. Coevolutionary dynamics via adaptive feedback in collective-risk social dilemma game.eLife, 12:e82954, may 2023

work page 2023

[9] [9]

Evaluation of climate models using palaeoclimatic data.Nature Climate Change, 2:417–424, 2012

Pascale Braconnot, Sandy Harrison, Masa Kageyama, et al. Evaluation of climate models using palaeoclimatic data.Nature Climate Change, 2:417–424, 2012

work page 2012

[10] [10]

Bermike, N

Patricia Anderson, O. Bermike, N. Bigelow, J. Brigham-Grette, Mathieu Duvall, Mary Edwards, Bianca Fr´ echette, Svend Funder, S. Johnsen, Jochen Knies, R. Koerner, Lozhkin Anatoly, J. Matthiessen, Glen MacDonald, G. Miller, M. Montoya, Daniel Muhs, B. Otto-Bliesner, and A. Velichko. Last interglacial arctic warmth confirms polar amplification of climate c...

work page 2006

[11] [11]

Braconnot, Olivier Marti, E

Franck Bassinot, Charline Marzin, P. Braconnot, Olivier Marti, E. Mathien-Blard, Lombard Fabien, and Laurent Bopp. Holocene evolution of summer winds and marine productivity in the tropical indian ocean in response to insolation forcing: data-model comparison.Climate of the Past, 7, 07 2011

work page 2011

[12] [12]

Prentice

Jennifer Marlon, Patrick Bartlein, Christopher Carcaillet, Daniel Gavin, Sandy Harrison, Philip Higuera, Fortunat Joos, Mitchell Power, and I. Prentice. Climate and human influences on global biomass burning over the past two millennia (vol 1, pg 697, 2008).Nature Geoscience, 2:307–307, 04 2009

work page 2008

[13] [13]

Jed Kaplan, Nancy Bigelow, Ian Prentice, Sandy Harrison, Patrick Bartlein, Torben Røjle Christensen, Wolfgang Cramer, Nadya Matvedeyeva, A. Mcguire, David Murray, Volodya 12 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al Razzhivin, Benjamin Smith, david walker, Patricia Anderson, Andrei Andreev, Linda Brubaker, Mary Edwards, and Lozhkin Anatoly. Climate...

work page 2003

[14] [14]

Convection-permitting modeling with regional climate models: Latest developments and next steps.WIREs Climate Change, 12(6):e731, 2021

Philippe Lucas-Picher, Daniel Arg¨ ueso, Erwan Brisson, Yves Tramblay, Peter Berg, Aude Lemonsu, Sven Kotlarski, and C´ ecile Caillaud. Convection-permitting modeling with regional climate models: Latest developments and next steps.WIREs Climate Change, 12(6):e731, 2021

work page 2021

[15] [15]

Punishment and inspection for governing the commons in a feedback-evolving game.PLoS computational biology, 14(7):e1006347, 2018

Xiaojie Chen and Attila Szolnoki. Punishment and inspection for governing the commons in a feedback-evolving game.PLoS computational biology, 14(7):e1006347, 2018

work page 2018

[16] [16]

Deterrence through punishment can resolve collective risk dilemmas in carbon emission games

Luo-Luo Jiang, Zhi Chen, Matjaˇ z Perc, Zhen Wang, J¨ urgen Kurths, and Yamir Moreno. Deterrence through punishment can resolve collective risk dilemmas in carbon emission games. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 33(4), 2023

work page 2023

[17] [17]

Caring for the future can turn tragedy into comedy for long-term collective action under risk of collapse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(23):12915–12922, 2020

Wolfram Barfuss, Jonathan F Donges, Vitor V Vasconcelos, J¨ urgen Kurths, and Simon A Levin. Caring for the future can turn tragedy into comedy for long-term collective action under risk of collapse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(23):12915–12922, 2020

work page 2020

[18] [18]

Communicating sentiment and outlook reverses inaction against collective risks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(30):17650–17655, 2020

Zhen Wang, Marko Jusup, Hao Guo, Lei Shi, Sunˇ cana Geˇ cek, Madhur Anand, Matjaˇ z Perc, Chris T Bauch, J¨ urgen Kurths, Stefano Boccaletti, et al. Communicating sentiment and outlook reverses inaction against collective risks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(30):17650–17655, 2020

work page 2020

[19] [19]

Ebi, Goodwin Gibbins, Timothy A

Luke Kemp, Chi Xu, Joanna Depledge, Kristie L. Ebi, Goodwin Gibbins, Timothy A. Kohler, Johan Rockstr¨ om, Marten Scheffer, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Will Steffen, and Timothy M. Lenton. Climate endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(34):e2108146119, 2022

work page 2022

[20] [20]

Kruczkiewicz, J

A. Kruczkiewicz, J. Klopp, J. Fisher, S. Mason, S. McClain, N. M. Sheekh, R. Moss, R. M. Parks, and C. Braneon. Compound risks and complex emergencies require new approaches to preparedness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(19):e2106795118, 2021

work page 2021

[21] [21]

Santos, Jorge M

Francisco P. Santos, Jorge M. Pacheco, Francisco C. Santos, et al. Dynamics of informal risk sharing in collective index insurance.Nature Sustainability, 4:426–432, 2021

work page 2021

[22] [22]

Levin, John M

Simon A. Levin, John M. Anderies, W. Neil Adger, et al. Governance in the face of extreme events: Lessons from evolutionary processes for structuring interventions, and the need to go beyond.Ecosystems, 25:697–711, 2022

work page 2022

[23] [23]

Evolution of cooperation driven by sampling reward.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 4(4):045003, oct 2023

Jiafeng Xiao, Linjie Liu, Xiaojie Chen, and Attila Szolnoki. Evolution of cooperation driven by sampling reward.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 4(4):045003, oct 2023. 13 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

work page 2023

[24] [24]

The complexity of climate change mitigation: an experiment with large groups.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 5(1):015007, feb 2024

Antonio Alfonso, Pablo Bra˜ nas-Garza, Antonio Cabrales, and Angel S´ anchez. The complexity of climate change mitigation: an experiment with large groups.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 5(1):015007, feb 2024

work page 2024

[25] [25]

Eco-evolutionary dynamics of bimatrix games.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 478(2267):20220567, 2022

Longmei Shu and Feng Fu. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of bimatrix games.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 478(2267):20220567, 2022

work page 2022

[26] [26]

Environmental feedback drives cooperation in spatial social dilemmas.Europhysics Letters, 120(5):58001, feb 2018

Attila Szolnoki and Xiaojie Chen. Environmental feedback drives cooperation in spatial social dilemmas.Europhysics Letters, 120(5):58001, feb 2018

work page 2018

[27] [27]

Eco-evolutionary dynamics with environmental feedback: Cooperation in a changing world.Europhysics Letters, 132(6):68001, 2020

Xin Wang and Feng Fu. Eco-evolutionary dynamics with environmental feedback: Cooperation in a changing world.Europhysics Letters, 132(6):68001, 2020

work page 2020

[28] [28]

Modeling natural resources exploitation in low-information environments.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 5(3):035002, jul 2024

Silvia Mu˜ noz-´Alvarez, Carlos Gracia-L´ azaro, and Yamir Moreno. Modeling natural resources exploitation in low-information environments.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 5(3):035002, jul 2024

work page 2024

[29] [29]

Effect of discontinuous fair-share emissions allocations immediately based on equity.Nature Communications, 16(8020), 2025

Yann Robiou du Pont, Mark Dekker, Detlef van Vuuren, et al. Effect of discontinuous fair-share emissions allocations immediately based on equity.Nature Communications, 16(8020), 2025. Published: 03 September 2025

work page 2025

[30] [30]

Combined effect of incentives and coupling in multigames in two-layer networks.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 6(1):015003, jan 2025

Luo-Luo Jiang, Yi-Ming Li, Wen-Jing Li, and Attila Szolnoki. Combined effect of incentives and coupling in multigames in two-layer networks.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 6(1):015003, jan 2025

work page 2025

[31] [31]

Advancing interpretability of machine-learning prediction models.Environmental Data Science, 1:e14, 2022

Laurie Trenary and Timothy DelSole. Advancing interpretability of machine-learning prediction models.Environmental Data Science, 1:e14, 2022

work page 2022

[32] [32]

P. B. Gibson, W. E. Chapman, A. Altinok, et al. Training machine learning models on climate model output yields skillful interpretable seasonal precipitation forecasts.Communications Earth & Environment, 2:159, 2021

work page 2021

[33] [33]

Schneider, L

T. Schneider, L. R. Leung, and R. C. J. Wills. Opinion: Optimizing climate models with process knowledge, resolution, and artificial intelligence.Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24(12):7041–7062, 2024

work page 2024

[34] [34]

Tolulope Ale, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, and Vandana P. Janeja. Advancing climate model interpretability: Feature attribution for arctic melt anomalies, 2025

work page 2025

[35] [35]

Ritchie, J.J

P.D.L. Ritchie, J.J. Clarke, P.M. Cox, et al. Overshooting tipping point thresholds in a changing climate.Nature, 592:517–523, 2021

work page 2021

[36] [36]

Social influence promotes cooperation in the public goods game.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 413:86–93, 2014

Te Wu, Feng Fu, Puxuan Dou, and Long Wang. Social influence promotes cooperation in the public goods game.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 413:86–93, 2014. 14 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

work page 2014

[37] [37]

Funding the united nations: How much does the u.s

Council on Foreign Relations. Funding the united nations: How much does the u.s. pay? https://www.cfr.org/article/ funding-united-nations-what-impact-do-us-contributions-have-un-agencies-and-programs,

work page

[38] [38]

Last updated: February 28, 2025; Accessed: 2025-08-14

work page 2025

[39] [39]

Don’t believe the disinformation: the un makes america stronger.SDG Action, September 2024

Rachel Pittman and Elizabeth M´ etraux. Don’t believe the disinformation: the un makes america stronger.SDG Action, September 2024. Accessed: 2025-08-11

work page 2024

[40] [40]

How the un advances u.s

Better World Campaign. How the un advances u.s. economic interests. https://betterworldcampaign.org/resources/briefing-book-2022/ united-nations-united-states-economic-interests, 2025. Accessed: 2025-08-10

work page 2022

[41] [41]

Global, climate action from cities, regions and businesses: Impact of individual actors and cooperative initiatives on global and national emissions

Takeshi Kuramochi, Swithin Liu, Niklas H¨ ohne, Sybrig Smit, Maria Jose de Villafranca Casas, Frederic Hans, Leonardo Nascimento, Paola Tanguy, Angel Hsu, Amy Weinfurter, et al. Global, climate action from cities, regions and businesses: Impact of individual actors and cooperative initiatives on global and national emissions. 2019

work page 2019

[42] [42]

Climate clubs: Can small groups of countries make a big difference in addressing climate change?Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(3):177–192, 2012

Lutz Weischer, Jennifer Morgan, and Milap Patel. Climate clubs: Can small groups of countries make a big difference in addressing climate change?Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(3):177–192, 2012

work page 2012

[43] [43]

The evolution of social behaviors and risk preferences in settings with uncertainty.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(30):e2406993121, 2024

Guocheng Wang, Qi Su, Long Wang, and Joshua B Plotkin. The evolution of social behaviors and risk preferences in settings with uncertainty.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(30):e2406993121, 2024

work page 2024

[44] [44]

Effects of heterogeneous wealth distribution on public cooperation with collective risk.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 82(1):016102, 2010

Jing Wang, Feng Fu, and Long Wang. Effects of heterogeneous wealth distribution on public cooperation with collective risk.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 82(1):016102, 2010

work page 2010

[45] [45]

The evolution of homophily.Scientific reports, 2(1):845, 2012

Feng Fu, Martin A Nowak, Nicholas A Christakis, and James H Fowler. The evolution of homophily.Scientific reports, 2(1):845, 2012

work page 2012

[46] [46]

Emergence of social cooperation in threshold public goods games with collective risk.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 80(1):016101, 2009

Jing Wang, Feng Fu, Te Wu, and Long Wang. Emergence of social cooperation in threshold public goods games with collective risk.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 80(1):016101, 2009. 15

work page 2009