Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Integrable Twelve-Component Nonlinear Dynamical System on a Quasi-One-Dimensional Lattice

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs two new semi-discrete integrable systems—twelve- and six-component—on a quasi-one-dimensional lattice, derived from a 4x4 Lax pair and fixed by local conservation laws.

desk verdict A serious symbolic construction of new 12- and 6-component discrete integrable systems, but the central zero-curvature check is asserted, not shown, so the verdict has to rest on an external algebra check. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.17976 v4 pith:VRYSRH54 submitted 2025-09-22 nlin.SI

Oleksiy O. Vakhnenko , Vyacheslav O. Vakhnenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SI MSC 39A3637K1035Q5558J70
keywords Laxintegrabilityquasi-one-dimensionallatticemulticomponentsystemsemi-discretenonlineardynamicslocalconservationlawszero-curvatureequationspace-timereversalsymmetryparametricdrive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The authors aim to show that the twelve-component system (6.1)–(6.14) and the six-component system (7.1)–(7.6) are new, genuinely multicomponent, Lax-integrable nonlinear dynamical systems on a quasi-one-dimensional lattice. They derive these systems from a 4×4 spectral matrix and an evolutionary matrix satisfying the semi-discrete zero-curvature equation. The key step is using the lowest on-site local conservation laws to fix the undetermined diagonal elements of the evolutionary matrix, which reduces a prototype set of sixteen equations to the twelve- and six-component closed forms. If correct, these systems extend the known class of integrable lattice models and offer concrete modeling for external parametric drive and magnetic field effects. The authors do not yet provide explicit solutions or a Hamiltonian structure, so the claim rests on the Lax pair and the internal consistency of the reduction.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the 4×4 spectral matrix L(n|z) with entries that are polynomials in the spectral parameter z (powers z², z, z⁰, z⁻¹, z⁻²), and the companion evolutionary matrix A(n|z) whose elements are determined by the zero-curvature equation dL/dτ = A(n+1)L − L A(n). The undetermined diagonal elements c11, c22, c33, c44 are fixed by requiring that certain on-site conserved densities—computed via a generalized direct recursive technique—are time-independent. This fixes the coupling structure and reduces the number of fields, producing the two closed systems. The normalization r22 = v33 = 1 and the transformation formulas (4.21)–(4.24) are essential parts of the reduction.

What would settle it

Choose an initial value with r22(n)=0 at a single site (or v33(n)=0); the construction formulas (3.17)–(3.30) require division by these quantities, so the system is not defined at that configuration, meaning the claimed integrability does not cover the full phase space.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the 4×4 matrix ansatz for the spectral operator L(n|z) and evolutionary operator A(n|z), combined with the zero-curvature equation, yields a consistent set of prototype equations (3.1)–(3.16). By imposing the natural constraints that the conserved densities ρ22 and ρ33 are time-independent and that ρ11 and ρ44 are also constant, the authors reduce the system to twelve or six independent field variables. The resulting twelve-component system is composed of six pairs of fields coupled linearly and nonlinearly, and it cannot be split into uncoupled subsystems. Both reduced systems admit a space-time reversal symmetry, and the twelve-component system also admits complex

Load-bearing premise

The whole derivation assumes that the zero-curvature equation with the adopted 4×4 ansatz gives exactly the listed prototype equations, and that the division by r22(n) and v33(n) in the fixing formulas never encounters a zero; the paper normalizes these to unity but does not prove that they remain non-vanishing for all solutions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Both systems are claimed to be genuinely multicomponent: they cannot be decoupled into independent lower-component systems, so they describe true multi-channel dynamics.
  • The twelve-component system's local current expression indicates that only four of its six subsystems carry charge; the remaining two act as spectators in transport.
  • The coupling parameters α and β may be arbitrary functions of time, so the system can represent parametric driving; under the complex-conjugation symmetry, their phases model a uniform magnetic field via Peierls factors.
  • The space-time reversal symmetry holds without extra conditions on the parameters, making it more general than ordinary parity-time symmetry.
  • The reduction method via local conservation laws is presented as a constructive tool that can fix ambiguities in the choice of evolutionary matrix, potentially applicable to other Lax pairs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could test the claimed integrability by applying Darboux–Bäcklund dressing (which the authors suggest as future work) to generate explicit soliton solutions; if such solutions exhibit elastic scattering, that would further substantiate the Lax pair.
  • The normalization r22 = v33 = 1 is a source of possible failure: the construction divides by these functions, and if a solution reaches zero in one of them, the equations may blow up or the Lax pair may become degenerate. A careful global analysis of this is needed.
  • The six-component system (7.1)–(7.6) appears to be a reduction of the twelve-component one with w+ = q+ etc., but the authors do not state this; if it is, the six-component system could be used to test the dynamics of the symmetric subspace.
  • The conservation-law fixing procedure could be applied to other spectral matrices with higher-order z-dependencies, potentially generating new integrable lattice systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes two new semi-discrete nonlinear systems on a quasi-one-dimensional lattice: a twelve-component system (6.1)-(6.12) and a six-component system (7.1)-(7.6). These are derived from a 4x4 Lax pair (2.2)-(2.3) through the semi-discrete zero-curvature equation (2.1), a set of local conservation laws, and reductions. The authors claim the systems are genuinely multicomponent, admit symmetries under complex conjugation and space-time reversal, and have possible applications to parametrically driven and magnetically coupled lattices. The derivation proceeds from a general prototype set of sixteen equations, with fourteen coefficients fixed algebraically, then four sampling functions determined by conservation-law constraints, and finally reductions to twelve or six actual field variables.

Significance. If the central Lax-integrability claim is correct, the paper provides a substantive contribution: novel multicomponent semi-discrete systems that go beyond the 'false multicomponent' examples criticized in the authors' earlier work. The constructive use of local conservation laws to pin down the sampling functions is a useful methodological point, and the time-dependent coupling parameters alpha and beta are an interesting feature. However, the manuscript currently does not supply an explicit verification that the reduced systems satisfy the zero-curvature equation, and the normalization procedure that removes r22 and v33 is asserted rather than demonstrated. The paper also honestly but contradictorily states in Section 8 and Appendix A that Hamiltonian and Poisson structures remain open, which weakens the abstract's 'completely integrable' terminology. The result is a compelling but incompletely verified construction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5 and Sections 6-7] The central claim that the systems (6.1)-(6.12) and (7.1)-(7.6) are Lax integrable is not verified in the manuscript. The derivation says that 'proper consideration' of the prototype equations and the specification formulas gives the final systems, but no substitution is displayed and no residual of the zero-curvature equation (2.1) is given. A single sign or index error in these long equations would break the representation. Because Lax integrability is the paper's main assertion, this is load-bearing. I request either an appendix that explicitly writes the reduced Lax matrices L(n|z), A(n|z) in terms of the reduced variables and verifies (2.1), or a computer algebra script/attachment that checks the identity.
  2. [Section 4, Eq. (4.17)] The normalization r22(n)=1=v33(n) is introduced via a 'proper scaling procedure' that is never described. The formulas (3.18)-(3.30) divide by r22(n) and v33(n), and the paper does not prove that these quantities remain nonzero during the evolution. Constraints (4.11) imply d/dtau ln r22(n)=0 and d/dtau ln v33(n)=0, so they are time-independent if initially nonzero, but the dynamics of the prototype system could in principle reach zero, and the scaling/gauge transformation that sets them to 1 must be written down. Without that transformation, the Lax representation for the normalized and reduced systems is not independently checkable.
  3. [Abstract, Section 8, Appendix A] The abstract and introduction call the systems 'completely integrable,' but Section 8 and Appendix A explicitly state that the Hamiltonian and Poisson structures are open problems. Lax integrability plus local conservation laws is not the same as Liouville integrability. Either the terminology should be weakened to 'Lax integrable' throughout, or a Hamiltonian structure should be provided. This is not merely cosmetic: the phrase 'completely integrable' appears in the title of the abstract field and is a central claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3.13)] There is a typo: 'u31(n1)d13(n)' should presumably be 'u31(n)d13(n)'.
  2. [Eq. (4.19)] The second 'T22(n)' in equation (4.19) should likely be 'T33(n)'.
  3. [Section 6.2] The notation for transformed fields under space-time reversal (e.g., bar over f_+(n)) conflicts with the bar used for complex conjugation in Section 6.1. Use a distinct symbol, such as a tilde, to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Section 8] The statement that only four of six subsystems participate in charge transportation is derived from the form of the local current (8.1), but this is an observation about the current, not about the dynamics. It may be worth clarifying that the other two subsystems' charges are still individually conserved but do not flow.
  5. [Abstract] Typo: 'inregrable' should be 'integrable'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new 12- and 6-component systems are derived from an explicit Lax-pair ansatz and zero-curvature computation, not from their own outputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is Lax integrability of the displayed 12- and 6-component systems. The derivation chain is self-contained: an explicit 4x4 spectral matrix L(n|z) and evolutionary matrix A(n|z) are written down (2.2)-(2.3); the zero-curvature equation (2.1) is used to produce the primary equations (3.1)-(3.16) and the fixing formulas (3.17)-(3.30); the on-site conservation laws (4.1)-(4.10) are stated and used to choose the free functions c_jj(n) via the constraints (4.11)-(4.12); and finally explicit reductions (5.1)-(5.8) and (5.9)-(5.16) yield the target systems. Every step is an algebraic consequence of the displayed ansatz and zero-curvature equation, not an imported 'prediction' or fitted parameter. The constraints imposed in (4.11)-(4.12) are freely chosen reduction conditions, not data fits. The paper cites its own earlier work for the constructive technique and for similar spectral operators, but the current ansatz and all necessary formulas are given in the paper, so the central claim does not reduce to a self-citation. The main limitations — that the final substitution into the zero-curvature equation is not fully expanded and that the Hamiltonian/Poisson structure is left open — are matters of verification and completeness, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on chosen ansatze and constraints rather than on fitted data. The main new content is the Lax pair and the two reductions; no new physical entities, particles, or forces are introduced. The self-cited direct-recursion method supplies background machinery, not the claimed result itself.

free parameters (4)
  • coupling parameters alpha and beta
    Spatially constant, possibly time-dependent; in (5.8) they replace a22=-i alpha and e33=+i beta. They set the overall scale and phases and are not fitted to data, but are chosen by hand.
  • nonlinearity sign sigma = ±1
    Labels focusing (sigma=+1) and defocusing (sigma=-1) nonlinearity; chosen by convention.
  • concomitant fields r22(n), v33(n) = 1
    Normalized to constants by scaling in (4.17), assuming spatial uniformity; an explicit modeling choice.
  • integration constants T22(n), T33(n) = 0
    Set to zero in (4.20) as the 'simplest possible variant', eliminating the corresponding conserved fields.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Zero-curvature equation (2.1) is the criterion for Lax integrability.
    Used throughout as the definition of integrability.
  • domain assumption The specific 4x4 ansatze (2.2) and (2.3) for L and A are admissible.
    The whole construction depends on choosing these forms; no derivation or uniqueness is given.
  • domain assumption The on-site local conservation laws (4.1)-(4.5) from the direct recurrent technique are valid for this operator.
    Invoked to fix the c_jj functions; the method is credited to prior work [34-37] and not re-proven here.
  • domain assumption Denominator fields r22(n) and v33(n) are nonzero so that (3.18)-(3.30) are defined.
    Not justified; the dynamics may violate this condition.
  • ad hoc to paper Constraints (4.11), (4.12) and normalizations (4.17), T22=T33=0 select the final systems.
    Called 'the most natural demands' and 'simplest possible variant'; other choices would give different systems.
  • ad hoc to paper Reduction formulas (5.1)-(5.8) and (5.9)-(5.16) define the 12- and 6-component variables.
    These are imposed substitutions; their completeness or physical necessity is not established.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integrable Twelve-Component Nonlinear Dynamical System on a Quasi-One-Dimensional Lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VRYSRH54

@misc{pith2026250917976,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integrable Twelve-Component Nonlinear Dynamical System on a Quasi-One-Dimensional Lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VRYSRH54}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.17976}
}
read the original abstract

Bearing in mind the potential physical applicability of multicomponent completely integrable nonlinear dynamical models on quasi-one-dimensional lattices we have developed the novel twelve-component and six-component semi-discrete nonlinear inregrable systems in the framework of semi-discrete Ablowitz-Kaup-Newell-Segur scheme. The set of lowest local conservation laws found by the generalized direct recurrent technique was shown to be indispensable constructive tool in the reduction procedure from the prototype to actual field variables. Two types of admissible symmetries for the twelve-component system and one type of symmetry for the six-component system have been established. The mathematical structure of total local current was shown to support the charge transportation only by four of six subsystems incorporated into the twelve-component system under study. The twelve-component system is able to model the actions of external parametric drive and external uniform magnetic field via time dependencies and phase factors of coupling parameters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Ablowitz M.J., Lectures on the inverse scattering transform,Stud. Appl. Math.58(1978), 17–94

    1978

  2. [2]

    Ablowitz M.J., Kaup D.J., Newell A.C., Segur H., Nonlinear-evolution equations of physical significance, Phys. Rev. Lett.31(1973), 125–127

    1973

  3. [3]

    Ablowitz M.J., Kaup D.J., Newell A.C., Segur H., The inverse scattering transform-Fourier analysis for nonlinear problems,Stud. Appl. Math.53(1974), 249–315

    1974

  4. [4]

    Ablowitz M.J., Ladik J.F., A nonlinear difference scheme and inverse scattering,Stud. Appl. Math.55 (1976), 213–229

    1976

  5. [5]

    Ablowitz M.J., Ladik J.F., Nonlinear differential-difference equations and Fourier analysis,J. Math. Phys. 17(1976), 1011–1018

    1976

  6. [6]

    Ablowitz M.J., Ohta Y., Trubatch A.D., On discretizations of the vector nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Lett. A253(1999), 287–304, arXiv:solv-int/9810014

    arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    Ablowitz M.J., Ohta Y., Trubatch A.D., On integrability and chaos in discrete systems,Chaos Solitons Fractals11(2000), 159–169, arXiv:solv-int/9810020

    arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    Phys.63(2018), 114, 10 pages

    Babalic C.N., Integrable discretization of coupled Ablowitz–Ladik equations with branched dispersion,Ro- manian J. Phys.63(2018), 114, 10 pages

    2018

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Babalic C.N., Complete integrability and complex solitons for generalized Volterra system with branched dispersion,Internat. J. Modern Phys. B34(2020), 2050274, 12 pages

    2020

  2. [10]

    Babalic C.N., Carstea A.S., Coupled Ablowitz–Ladik equations with branched dispersion,J. Phys. A50 (2017), 415201, 13 pages, arXiv:1705.10975

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bender C.M., Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians,Rep. Progr. Phys.70(2007), 947–1018, arXiv:hep-th/0703096

    2007 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Carstea A.S., Tokihiro T., Coupled discrete KdV equations and modular genetic networks,J. Phys. A48 (2015), 055205, 12 pages

    2015

  5. [13]

    Mater.32(2020), 2001893, 26 pages

    Chen Z., Narita A., M¨ ullen K., Graphene nanoribbons: On-surface synthesis and integration into electronic devices,Adv. Mater.32(2020), 2001893, 26 pages

    2020

  6. [14]

    Chubykalo O.A., Konotop V.V., V´ azquez L., Vekslerchik V.E., Some features of the repulsive discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation,Phys. Let. A169(1992), 359–363

    1992

  7. [15]

    Faddeev L.D., Takhtajan L.A., Hamiltonian methods in the theory of solitons,Classics Math., Springer, Berlin, 2007

    2007

  8. [16]

    Feynman R.P., Leighton R.B., Sands M., The Feynman lectures on physics. Vol. III: Quantum mechanics, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass., 1963

    1963

  9. [17]

    and Math

    Gerdzhikov V.S., Ivanov M.I., Hamiltonian structure of multicomponent nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in difference form,Theoret. and Math. Phys52(1982), 676–685

    1982

  10. [18]

    Konotop V.V., Vekslerchik V.E., On soliton creation in the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger models: discrete and continuous versions,J. Phys. A25(1992), 4037–4042

    1992

  11. [19]

    Konotop V.V., Yang J., Zezyulin D.A., Nonlinear waves inPT-symmetric systems,Rev. Mod. Phys.88 (2016), 035002, 59 pages

    2016

  12. [20]

    Franklin Inst.329(1992), 923–966

    Maschke B.M., van der Schaft A.J., Breedveld P.C., An intrinsic Hamiltonian formulation of network dy- namics: Nonstandard Poisson structures and gyrators,J. Franklin Inst.329(1992), 923–966

    1992

  13. [21]

    Phys.80(1933), 763–791

    Peierls R., Zur Theorie des Diamagnetismus von Leitungselektronen,Z. Phys.80(1933), 763–791. 16 O.O. Vakhnenko and V.O. Vakhnenko

    1933

  14. [22]

    Perepelytsya S., Uliˇ cn´ y J., Volkov S.N., Molecular dynamics study of the competitive binding of hydro- gen peroxide and water molecules with DNA phosphate groups,Eur. Biophys. J.50(2021), 759–770, arXiv:2004.11882

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Satchanska G., Davidova S., Petrov P.D., Natural and synthetic polymers for biomedical and environmental applications,Polymers16(2024), 1159, 33 pages

    2024

  16. [24]

    Toda M., Vibration of a chain with nonlinear interaction,J. Phys. Soc. Japan22(1967), 431–436

    1967

  17. [25]

    Toda M., Wave propagation in anharmonic lattices,J. Phys. Soc. Japan23(1967), 501–506

    1967

  18. [26]

    Rep.18(1975), 1–123

    Toda M., Studies of a non-linear lattice,Phys. Rep.18(1975), 1–123

    1975

  19. [27]

    Torres del Castillo G.F., Vel´ azquez Quesada M.P., Symplectic structures and dynamical symmetry groups, Rev. Mex. de F ´ ıs.50(2004), 608–613

    2004

  20. [28]

    Tsuchida T., Ujino H., Wadati M., Integrable semi-discretization of the coupled modified KdV equations, J. Math. Phys.39(1998), 4785–4813

    1998

  21. [29]

    Tsuchida T., Ujino H., Wadati M., Integrable semi-discretization of the coupled nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations,J. Phys. A32(1999), 2239–2262, arXiv:solv-int/9903013

    1999 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Tu G.-Z., A trace identity and its applications to the theory of discrete integrable systems,J. Phys. A23 (1990), 3903–3922

    1990

  23. [31]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Nonlinear beating excitations on ladder lattice,J. Phys. A32(1999), 5735–5748

    1999

  24. [32]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Nonlinear model of intramolecular excitations on a multileg ladder lattice,Phys. Rev. E 60(1999), R2492–R2495

    1999

  25. [33]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Enigma of probability amplitudes in Hamiltonian formulation of integrable semidiscrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger systems,Phys. Rev. E77(2008), 026604, 9 pages

    2008

  26. [34]

    Local conservation laws,J

    Vakhnenko O.O., Semidiscrete integrable nonlinear systems generated by the new fourth-order spectral operator. Local conservation laws,J. Nonlinear Math. Phys.18(2011), 401–414

    2011

  27. [35]

    Systems of obverse type,J

    Vakhnenko O.O., Semidiscrete integrable nonlinear systems generated by the new fourth order spectral operator. Systems of obverse type,J. Nonlinear Math. Phys.18(2011), 415–425

    2011

  28. [36]

    Nonlinear Math

    Vakhnenko O.O., Four-wave semidiscrete nonlinear integrable system withPT-symmetry,J. Nonlinear Math. Phys.20(2013), 606–622

    2013

  29. [37]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Nonlinear integrable model of Frenkel-like excitations on a ribbon of triangular lattice, J. Math. Phys.56(2015), 033505, 21 pages

    2015

  30. [38]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Symmetry-broken canonizations of the semi-discrete integrable nonlinear Schr¨ odinger sys- tem with background-controlled inter-site coupling,J. Math. Phys.57(2016), 113504, 16 pages

    2016

  31. [39]

    Nonlinear Math

    Vakhnenko O.O., Semi-discrete integrable nonlinear Schr¨ odinger system with background-controlled inter- site resonant coupling,J. Nonlinear Math. Phys.24(2017), 250–302

    2017

  32. [40]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Integrable nonlinear Schr¨ odinger system on a lattice with three structural elements in the unit cell,J. Math. Phys.59(2018), 053504, 25 pages

    2018

  33. [41]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Six-component semi-discrete integrable nonlinear Schr¨ odinger system,Lett. Math. Phys. 108(2018), 1807–1824

    2018

  34. [42]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Vakhnenko V.O., Dipole-monopole criticality and chargeless half mode in an integrable gauge-coupled pseudoexciton-phonon system on a regular one-dimensional lattice,Phys. Rev. E108(2023), 024223, 8 pages

    2023

  35. [43]

    Two-component nonlinear system with the on-site and spatially distributed inertial mass parameters,Ukr

    Vakhnenko O.O., Vakhnenko V.O., Development and analysis of novel integrable nonlinear dynamical sys- tems on quasi-one-dimensional lattices. Two-component nonlinear system with the on-site and spatially distributed inertial mass parameters,Ukr. J. Phys.69(2024), 168–178

    2024

  36. [44]

    Parametrically driven nonlinear system of pseudo-excitations on a two-leg ladder lattice,Ukr

    Vakhnenko O.O., Vakhnenko V.O., Development and analysis of novel integrable nonlinear dynamical sys- tems on quasi-one-dimensional lattices. Parametrically driven nonlinear system of pseudo-excitations on a two-leg ladder lattice,Ukr. J. Phys.69(2024), 577–590

    2024

  37. [45]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Velgakis M.J., Transverse and longitudinal dynamics of nonlinear intramolecular excita- tions on multileg ladder lattices,Phys. Rev. E61(2000), 7110–7120

    2000

  38. [46]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Verchenko A.P., Nonlinear system ofPT-symmetric excitations and Toda vibrations integrable by the Darboux–B¨ acklund dressing method,Proc. R. Soc. A477(2021), 20210562, 18 pages

    2021

  39. [47]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Verchenko A.P., Branched-dispersion generalizations of Lotka–Volterra and Ablowitz– Ladik nonlinear integrable systems revisited from the intersite coupling standpoint,Phys. Lett. A452 (2022), 128460, 6 pages. Integrable Twelve-Component Nonlinear Dynamical System 17

    2022

  40. [48]

    Vakhnenko O.O., Verchenko A.P., Dipole–monopole alternative in nonlinear dynamics of an integrable gauge-coupled exciton-phonon system on a one-dimensional lattice,Eur. Phys. J. Plus137(2022), 1176, 18 pages

    2022

  41. [49]

    Vekslerchik V.E., Konotop V.V., Discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation under nonvanishing boundary conditions,Inverse Problems8(1992), 889–909

    1992

  42. [50]

    Wen X.-Y., Yuan C.-L., Controllable rogue wave and mixed interaction solutions for the coupled Ablowitz– Ladik equations with branched dispersion,Appl. Math. Lett.123(2022), 107591, 7 pages

    2022

  43. [51]

    Yu F., Yu J., Li L., Some discrete soliton solutions and interactions for the coupled Ablowitz–Ladik equations with branched dispersion,Wave Motion94(2020), 102500, 11 pages

    2020

  44. [52]

    Yuan C., Yang H., Meng X., Tian Y., Zhou Q., Liu W., Modulational instability and discrete rogue waves with adjustable positions for a two-component higher-order Ablowitz–Ladik system associated with 4×4 Lax pair,Chaos Solitons Fractals168(2023), 113180, 12 pages

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.