Dispersive estimates for fractional order Schr\"odinger operators

M. Burak Erdogan; Michael Goldberg; William Green

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Dispersive estimates for fractional order Schr\"odinger operators

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding a decaying potential to a fractional Laplacian does not slow down the absolutely continuous evolution: it inherits the free L1-to-L∞ decay rate, with a smoothing correction in two dimensions.

desk verdict First global dispersive bounds for perturbed fractional Schrödinger operators, with genuinely new resolvent expansions; the main theorems are credible, but two high-energy tail lemmas are sketched and the spectral hypotheses are assumed rather than verified. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.18002 v2 pith:M55XJSFI submitted 2025-09-22 math.AP

M. Burak Erdogan , Michael Goldberg , William Green This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35P2535R1135B40

keywords fractionalSchrödingeroperatorsdispersiveestimatesresolventboundslimitingabsorptionprinciplezeroenergyregularityL1-to-L∞decaynonlocalequationStone'sformula

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to prove that the long-time spreading of a quantum evolution generated by a fractional Laplacian plus a decaying potential is identical to that of the free fractional Laplacian, after bound states are removed. The central results are conditional on two spectral assumptions: no positive embedded eigenvalues and zero energy being regular. In dimensions n≥3, for fractional orders α between (n+1)/4 and n/2, the bound is ∥e^{itH}P_ac(H)∥_{L1→L∞} ≲ |t|^{-n/(2α)}; in two dimensions, for α in [3/4,1), a smoothed evolution satisfies ∥e^{itH}H^{1−1/α}P_ac(H)∥_{L1→L∞} ≲ |t|^{-1}. These are the first global dispersive bounds for perturbed fractional Schrödinger operators, and they imply Strichartz estimates by standard arguments. The proof works by combining detailed pointwise resolvent estimates with a low-energy expansion and a quantitative limiting absorption principle.

What carries the argument

The main object is the limiting free resolvent R_0^±(λ^{2α}) = ((−Δ)^α − (λ^2 ± i0))^{-1}, whose kernel is represented as e^{iλr} r^{-(n−2α)} F(λr); the paper proves uniform pointwise bounds and a two-term low-energy expansion. Around this, the perturbed resolvent is controlled via the symmetric resolvent identity R_V^± = R_0^± − R_0^± v M_±^{-1} v R_0^±, with M_± = U+vR_0^±v and v=|V|^{1/2}. Stone's formula converts the difference R_V^+−R_V^- into the propagator kernel, and the resolvent bounds supply stationary-phase control of the resulting oscillatory λ-integrals. Invertibility of M_±(0) is exactly what the zero-regularity assumption provides.

What would settle it

A concrete test: choose n=2 or n=3 in the stated α-range, take a compactly supported real-valued V satisfying the decay and spectral assumptions, and compute or simulate ∥e^{itH}P_ac(H)∥_{L1→L∞} at large times; if the decay is slower than |t|^{-n/(2α)} (or |t|^{-1} in n=2), the central claim is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that, for fractional Schrödinger operators H=(−Δ)^α+V with α not an integer, the absolutely continuous part of the evolution decays at exactly the free rate once the hypotheses on the spectrum hold. In dimensions n≥3 and (n+1)/4≤α<n/2, with |V(x)|≲⟨x⟩^{-β}, β>n+4, and with no embedded eigenvalues and zero a regular point, ∥e^{itH}P_ac(H)∥_{L1→L∞}≲|t|^{-n/(2α)}. In two dimensions, for 3/4≤α<1 and β>4, the decay is ∥e^{itH}H^{1−1/α}P_ac(H)∥_{L1→L∞}≲|t|^{-1}. Along the way the paper gives pointwise kernel bounds for all 0<α<n/2 and a quantitative limiting absorption principle for 1/2<α<n/2, and it characterizes zero-energy regularity in terms of distributional solutions of

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that H has no positive embedded eigenvalues and that zero is a regular point of the spectrum; the paper assumes this, and the resolvent inversion and Stone-formula step collapse if a potential produces either.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In dimensions n≥3, any potential with |V(x)|≲⟨x⟩^{-β}, β>n+4, and with no embedded eigenvalues and zero regular, gives the full free dispersive decay |t|^{-n/(2α)} for e^{itH}P_ac(H).
In two dimensions, for 3/4≤α<1, the same spectral assumptions give |t|^{-1} decay for the smoothed evolution e^{itH}H^{1−1/α}P_ac(H).
The pointwise free-resolvent bounds hold for all 0<α<n/2, and the quantitative limiting absorption principle holds for 1/2<α<n/2, independent of potential assumptions beyond decay.
Standard arguments convert the dispersive bounds into families of Strichartz estimates for fractional Schrödinger equations.
The zero-energy characterization shows that for decaying potentials, zero-energy resonances are possible precisely when 2α<n≤4α, while for n>4α such resonances are expected to be absent.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: the decay condition β>n+4 is likely far from optimal, since integer-order analogues hold near β=2α; a refined low-energy expansion could lower the required decay rate.
Beyond the paper: the restriction α≥(n+1)/4 comes from high-energy resolvent growth, not from zero-energy regularity, so extending to 1/2<α<(n+1)/4 in n≥3 would require a different high-energy mechanism.
Beyond the paper: the free-flow analysis suggests a smoothing-weighted bound e^{itH}H^{n/2(1−1/α)}P_ac(H) with decay |t|^{-n/2} for all dimensions in the range 1/2<α<1; the paper proves only the two-dimensional case.
Beyond the paper: the logarithmic corrections that appear when n=4α in the low-energy expansion hint that endpoint cases may carry log losses or borderline resonance behavior if the method is pushed.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is the first global dispersive bound for H=(-Δ)^α+V with non-integer α, and the resolvent machinery behind it is the real contribution. The theorems in n≥2 match the free decay rate after projecting off bound states, and the mechanism checks out. The paper does something new: it extends the integer-order results of Goldberg-Green and the free fractional results of Cho-Ozawa-Xia to the perturbed nonlocal setting, and it handles two genuinely fractional phenomena that don't appear for integer α. The high-energy singularity of the resolvent at zero and the low-energy two-power-series expansion (integer powers of λ plus powers of λ^{1/α}, with logs when they collide) are quantified in Propositions 2.1 and 2.2. Proposition 2.3's limiting absorption principle is also useful. Section 5, characterizing zero regularity in terms of distributional solutions, is a nice addition and partially addresses the weakest assumption.

Now the soft spots, in proportion. The high-energy tail lemmas, Lemma 3.3 for n=2 and Lemma 4.3 for n≥3, are the least detailed. The derivative bound (16) in Lemma 4.3 is asserted after a sentence about mimicking the earlier argument, and the derivative estimates in Lemma 3.3 are compressed. The mechanism is visible—by combining the phase as e^{iλ(|x|-|x-x1|)} before differentiating, the problematic |x| factors become ⟨x1⟩^j, and the decay β > n/2α+5/2 supplies enough weight—so I don't see an actual error, but a referee will want those steps written out. The other soft spot is the spectral hypotheses. The theorems are explicitly conditional on the absence of embedded eigenvalues and on zero being a regular point; these assumptions are standard and necessary (bound states at positive energy or threshold resonances genuinely destroy the free decay), and Section 5 clarifies what zero regularity means, but the paper does not prove that the stated potential class satisfies them. That's a limitation of the theorem statement, not a flaw in the argument. The decay rates β>n+4 for n≥3 and β>4 for n=2 are strong but consistent with pointwise resolvent methods.

I agree with the reader's conditional verdict and with the stress-test note: the central argument has no load-bearing flaw. The sketched parts are presentation gaps, not detected errors. The paper is for people working on dispersive estimates, spectral theory of fractional/nonlocal operators, and Strichartz estimates; the resolvent bounds will be reused.

Send it to a serious referee. The core is sound and novel; the tail lemmas need expansion, not a rethink.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies dispersive estimates for the evolution e^{itH} with H=(-Δ)^α+V on R^n, n≥2, for non-integer α in the range (n+1)/4 ≤ α < n/2 (and in n=2, 3/4≤α<1). Under the explicit assumptions that H has no embedded eigenvalues and that zero is a regular point of the spectrum, the main theorems claim ∥e^{itH}P_ac(H)∥_{L^1→L^∞} ≲ |t|^{-n/(2α)} for n≥3, and ∥e^{itH}H^{1-1/α}P_ac(H)∥_{L^1→L^∞} ≲ |t|^{-1} for n=2. The proof combines detailed pointwise resolvent bounds and expansions (Propositions 2.1–2.2), a quantitative limiting absorption principle (Proposition 2.3), a Born-series decomposition at high energy, and a low-energy analysis via the symmetric resolvent identity with M±(λ)=U+vR_0(λ^{2α})v. Section 5 gives a partial characterization of zero-energy regularity.

Significance. If correct, these are the first global L^1→L^∞ dispersive bounds for perturbed fractional Schrödinger operators in the stated ranges. The resolvent kernel expansions and the limiting absorption principle are potentially useful independent tools. The paper is appropriately conditional: the spectral hypotheses are stated explicitly in the introduction and theorems, and the authors are careful to cite prior work, including their own, for background results. The main weakness is that several load-bearing estimates, especially the high-energy tails, are sketched rather than fully proved. The conditional nature of the main theorems should be kept in mind by readers, since verifying the absence of embedded eigenvalues and zero regularity for the potential class is not addressed.

major comments (3)

[§4.1, Lemma 4.3, Eq. (16)] The derivative bounds (16) are the essential high-energy input for Theorem 1.2, but their proof is only sketched. Formula (17) splits the derivatives, but the required weighted L^2 estimates for ∂_λ^j R_0 for j=1,2 are not stated; Proposition 2.3 gives derivative bounds for R_V, not the spatial weights appearing in (16). The sentence 'the remainder of the proof mimics that of Lemma 3.3' does not show how derivatives falling on the phase e^{-iλ|x|} produce ⟨x1⟩^j factors, nor how the final ⟨x⟩^{1/2-n/(2α)}⟨y⟩^{1/2-n/(2α)} weights arise. Since Proposition 4.1 depends on this estimate, please provide a complete derivation or precise operator-norm statements.
[§4.1, Lemma 4.2, endpoint α=(n+1)/4] In the small-time endpoint case, the proof uses the inequality |2αtλ^{2α-1}+R| ≳ (|t|λ^{2α-1})^{1/2} R^{1/2} without proof. This inequality is not valid near the stationary point λ0=(R/(2α|t|))^{1/(2α-1)} when t and R have opposite signs; the cut-off χ_{λ0} is designed to avoid this, but the support condition must be used explicitly to justify the bound. Without this justification, the claimed |t|^{-2n/(n+1)} decay at the endpoint is not fully established. Please add the missing elementary argument or replace it with a standard non-stationary-phase estimate.
[§4.2, Proposition 4.4, Eq. (22)] The bound (22) is asserted to follow from Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 4.5, but it is a crucial step in the Van der Corput estimate near λ0. The derivation must account for the two cases |x|<|y| and |y|<|x|, the contributions of F± in the resolvent difference, and the way the exponent 1/2-n/(2α) appears after integrating against the weights from M_+^{-1}-M_-^{-1}. As written, the proof jumps from 'we will use that' to the final bound. Please include the kernel-level derivation; the same comment applies to the analogous bound for n=2 in Proposition 3.4.

minor comments (4)

[§4.1, Eq. (15)] The product in the integrand should be ∏_{i=1}^k V(x_i), not V(x_k); the same typo appears in the line below.
[Abstract / Theorem 1.2] The abstract states α∉N, but for n=3 the lower bound is α≥1, so the main theorem includes the integer case α=1; please clarify the wording.
[§5, Lemma 5.1] Typo: 'Cauchy-Schwartz' should be 'Cauchy-Schwarz'.
[§4.1, Lemma 4.3] The paragraph beginning 'The decay on V is necessitated...' is difficult to parse; consider rewriting with explicit norms and indices.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found; the derivation is self-contained given its stated spectral hypotheses.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a conditional dispersive bound for H=(-\Delta)^\alpha+V. The hypotheses (no embedded eigenvalues, zero a regular point) are explicitly stated assumptions of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2, not conclusions derived from the desired decay rate. The proof proceeds through standard tools: Stone's formula, the Born series with the symmetric resolvent identity, and Pointwise resolvent expansions (Propositions 2.1 and 2.2) obtained from direct Fourier-transform computations. The comparison to the classical Schrödinger resolvent invokes a known fact about e^{i\lambda r}/r^{n-2}, even though reference [17] is by two of the authors; this fact is parameter-free, external, and does not presuppose the fractional dispersive estimate. Similarly, the uses of [15] and [29] are standard kernel and fractional-integral bounds that are independent of the claimed theorems. The low-energy analysis reduces to invertibility of M_\pm(0), which is exactly the zero-regularity assumption, and the difference M_+^{-1}-M_-^{-1} is computed from the free resolvent difference, tracking the expected \lambda^{n-2\alpha} factor. No fitted parameters, no prediction equivalent to an input, and no self-citation chain is used to force the result. The least detailed parts are the high-energy tail lemmas, where derivative bounds such as (16) are asserted rather than fully derived; this is a completeness gap, not circularity. The paper's new content—resolvent kernel bounds, limiting absorption, and the resulting |t|^{-n/(2\alpha)} decay—does not reduce to its assumptions by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted parameters. It rests on standard spectral assumptions on V and on external analytic lemmas.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The potential V is real-valued with |V(x)|≲⟨x⟩^{-β} for β>4 (n=2) or β>n+4 (n≥3)
Stated hypotheses of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2; used throughout for spatial integral convergence.
domain assumption H has no embedded eigenvalues
Required for the limiting absorption principle, Proposition 2.3, and for the Born series tail estimates.
domain assumption Zero is a regular point of the spectrum of H and of (-Δ)^α
Required for invertibility of M±(0) in the low energy analysis, Lemmas 3.5 and 4.5; automatic for (-Δ)^α when 2α<n.
standard math External lemmas from prior literature (fractional integral mapping, kernel estimates) are valid
Uses Lemma 2.3 of [29] and Lemma 6.3 of [15] without reproof.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dispersive estimates for fractional order Schr\"odinger operators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M55XJSFI

@misc{pith2026250918002,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dispersive estimates for fractional order Schr\"odinger operators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M55XJSFI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.18002}
}

abstract

We prove dispersive bounds for fractional Schr\"odinger operators on $\mathbb R^n$ of the form $H=(-\Delta)^{\alpha}+V$ with $V$ a real-valued, decaying potential and $\alpha \notin\mathbb N$. We derive pointwise bounds on the resolvent operators for all $0<\alpha<\frac{n}{2}$, a quantitative limiting absorption principle for $\frac12<\alpha<\frac{n}{2}$, and establish global dispersive estimates in dimension $n\geq 2$ for the range $\frac{n+1}{4}\leq \alpha <\frac{n}2$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

[1]

Abramowitz, M. and I. A. Stegun.Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables.National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, 55. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1964

1964
[2]

Agmon,Spectral properties of Schr¨ odinger operators and scattering theory.Ann

S. Agmon,Spectral properties of Schr¨ odinger operators and scattering theory.Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 2 (1975), no. 2, 151–218

1975
[3]

Beceanu,New estimates for a time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation.Duke Math

M. Beceanu,New estimates for a time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation.Duke Math. J.159(2011), no.3, 417–477

2011
[4]

Beceanu,Structure of wave operators for a scaling-critical class of potentials.Amer

M. Beceanu,Structure of wave operators for a scaling-critical class of potentials.Amer. J. Math. 136 (2014), no.2, 255–308

2014
[5]

Beceanu, and M

M. Beceanu, and M. Goldberg,Schr¨ odinger dispersive estimates for a scaling-critical class of potentials.Comm. Math. Phys. 314 (2012), no.2, 471–481

2012
[6]

Beceanu, and M

M. Beceanu, and M. Goldberg,Strichartz Estimates and Maximal Operators for the Wave Equation inR 3. J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), no. 3, 1476-1510

2014
[7]

Beceanu, and W

M. Beceanu, and W. Schlag,Structure formulas for wave operators.Amer. J. Math. 142 (2020), no. 3, 751–807

2020
[8]

Beceanu, and W

M. Beceanu, and W. Schlag,Structure formulas for wave operators under a small scaling invariant condition.J. Spectr. Theory 9 (2019), no. 3, 967–990

2019

Show all 36 references

[9]

T. A. Bui, X. T. Duong, and Y. Hong,Dispersive and Strichartz estimates for the three-dimensional wave equation with a scaling-critical class of potentials.J. Funct. Anal. 271 (2016), no.8, 2215-2246

2016
[10]

Cho and S

Y. Cho and S. H. Lee,Strichartz estimates in spherical coordinates, Indiana Univ. Math. J.62(2013), no. 3, 991–1020

2013
[11]

Y. Cho, T. Ozawa and S. Xia,Remarks on some dispersive estimates, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal.10(2011), no. 4, 1121–1128

2011
[12]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, M. Goldberg, and W. R. Green,Counterexamples toLp boundedness of wave operators for classical and higher order Schr¨ odinger operators,J. Funct. Anal. 285, (2023) no. 5, 110008

2023
[13]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, M. Goldberg, and W. R. Green,Dispersive estimates for higher order Schr¨ odinger operators with scaling-critical potentials, Math. Ann. 392 (2025), 2225–2252

2025
[14]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, M. Goldberg, and W. R. Green,TheL p-continuity of wave operators for fractional order Schr¨ odinger operators, preprint 2025. 26 ERDO ˘GAN, GOLDBERG, GREEN

2025
[15]

B., and Green, W

Erdo˘ gan, M. B., and Green, W. R.Dispersive estimates for the Schrodinger equation forC n−3 2 potentials in odd dimensions. Int. Math. Res. Notices 2010:13, 2532–2565

2010
[16]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, and W. R. Green,TheL p-continuity of wave operators for higher order Schr¨ odinger operators, Adv. Math. 404 (2022), Paper No. 108450

2022
[17]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, and W. R. Green,A note on endpointL p-continuity of wave operators for classical and higher order Schr ¨dinger operators.J. Differential Equations, 355, (2023), 144-161

2023
[18]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, W. R. Green, and E. Toprak,On the Fourth order Schr¨ odinger equation in three dimensions: dispersive estimates and zero energy resonances. J. Differ. Eq., 267, (2019), no. 3, 1899–1954

2019
[19]

H. Feng, A. Soffer, and X. Yao,Decay estimates and Strichartz estimates of fourth order Schr¨ odinger operator. Journal of Functional Analysis, Volume 274, Issue 2, 2018, 605–658

2018
[20]

H. Feng, A. Soffer, Z. Wu, and X. Yao,Decay estimates for higher order elliptic operators, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373 (2020), no. 4, 2805—2859

2020
[21]

Goldberg,Dispersive bounds for the three-dimensional Schr¨ odinger equation wih almost critical potentials, Geom

M. Goldberg,Dispersive bounds for the three-dimensional Schr¨ odinger equation wih almost critical potentials, Geom. and Funct. Anal. 16 (2006), no. 3, 517–536

2006
[22]

GoldbergThe Helmholtz Equation withL p Data and Bochner-Riesz Multipliers.Math

M. GoldbergThe Helmholtz Equation withL p Data and Bochner-Riesz Multipliers.Math. Res. Lett. 23 (2016), no. 6, 1665–1679

2016
[23]

Goldberg and W

M. Goldberg and W. Green,Dispersive estimates for higher dimensional Schr¨ odinger Operators with threshold eigenvalues I: The odd dimensional case,J. Funct. Anal. 269 (2015) no. 3, 633–682

2015
[24]

Goldberg, and W

M. Goldberg, and W. Green,Dispersive estimates for higher dimensional Schr¨ odinger Operators with threshold eigenvalues II: The even dimensional case,J. Spectr. Theory 7 (2017), 33–86

2017
[25]

M. J. Goldberg and M. Visan,A counterexample to dispersive estimates for Schr¨ odinger operators in higher dimensions, Comm. Math. Phys.266(2006), no. 1, 211–238

2006
[26]

Green, and E

W. Green, and E. Toprak,On the Fourth order Schr¨ odinger equation in four dimensions: dispersive estimates and zero energy resonances,J. Differential Equations, 267, (2019), no. 3, 1899–1954

2019
[27]

Z. H. Guo and Y. Wang,Improved Strichartz estimates for a class of dispersive equations in the radial case and their applications to nonlinear Schr¨ odinger and wave equations, J. Anal. Math.124(2014), 1–38

2014
[28]

Hill, T.Dispersive estimates of Schrodinger and Schrodinger-Like Equations in One DimensionPh. D. Thesis, University of Cincinnati, (2020)

2020
[29]

Jensen,Spectral properties of Schr¨ odinger operators and time-decay of the wave functions results inL 2(Rm), m≥5, Duke Math

A. Jensen,Spectral properties of Schr¨ odinger operators and time-decay of the wave functions results inL 2(Rm), m≥5, Duke Math. J.47(1980), no. 1, 57–80

1980
[30]

Laskin,Fractional quantum mechanics and L´ evy path integrals, Phys

N. Laskin,Fractional quantum mechanics and L´ evy path integrals, Phys. Lett. A268(2000), no. 4-6, 298–305

2000
[31]

Laskin,Fractional Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys

N. Laskin,Fractional Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Rev. E (3)66(2002), no. 5, 056108, 7 pp

2002
[32]

P. Li, A. Soffer, and X. YaoDecay estimates for fourth-order Schr¨ odinger operators in dimension two.J. Funct. Anal. 284 (2023), no. 6, Paper No. 109816, 83 pp

2023
[33]

Mizutani, Z

H. Mizutani, Z. Wan, and X. Yao,L p-boundedness of wave operators for fourth-order Schr¨ odinger operators on the line, preprint, 2022. arXiv:2201.04758

2022 arXiv
[34]

Schlag.On pointwise decay of waves.J

W. Schlag.On pointwise decay of waves.J. Math. Phys. 62, 061509 (2021)

2021
[35]

Soffer, Z

A. Soffer, Z. Wu, and X. Yao.Decay estimates for bi-Schr¨ odinger operators in dimension one.Ann. Henri Poincar` e 23 (2022), no. 8, 2683–2744

2022
[36]

Zhang, T

R. Zhang, T. Huang and Q. Zheng,The scattering of fractional Schr¨ odinger operators with short range potentials, J. Funct. Anal.281(2021), no. 2, Paper No. 109033, 44 pp. DISPERSIVE ESTIMATES FOR FRACTIONAL SCHR ¨ODINGER OPERATORS 27 Department of Mathematics, University of I...

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Abramowitz, M. and I. A. Stegun.Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables.National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, 55. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1964

1964

[2] [2]

Agmon,Spectral properties of Schr¨ odinger operators and scattering theory.Ann

S. Agmon,Spectral properties of Schr¨ odinger operators and scattering theory.Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 2 (1975), no. 2, 151–218

1975

[3] [3]

Beceanu,New estimates for a time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation.Duke Math

M. Beceanu,New estimates for a time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation.Duke Math. J.159(2011), no.3, 417–477

2011

[4] [4]

Beceanu,Structure of wave operators for a scaling-critical class of potentials.Amer

M. Beceanu,Structure of wave operators for a scaling-critical class of potentials.Amer. J. Math. 136 (2014), no.2, 255–308

2014

[5] [5]

Beceanu, and M

M. Beceanu, and M. Goldberg,Schr¨ odinger dispersive estimates for a scaling-critical class of potentials.Comm. Math. Phys. 314 (2012), no.2, 471–481

2012

[6] [6]

Beceanu, and M

M. Beceanu, and M. Goldberg,Strichartz Estimates and Maximal Operators for the Wave Equation inR 3. J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), no. 3, 1476-1510

2014

[7] [7]

Beceanu, and W

M. Beceanu, and W. Schlag,Structure formulas for wave operators.Amer. J. Math. 142 (2020), no. 3, 751–807

2020

[8] [8]

Beceanu, and W

M. Beceanu, and W. Schlag,Structure formulas for wave operators under a small scaling invariant condition.J. Spectr. Theory 9 (2019), no. 3, 967–990

2019