Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 28 references

Stability and optical quality of "windmill"-formed 8CB liquid crystal films for replenishable plasma mirrors

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that ultrathin 8CB liquid crystal films formed by a 'windmill' device can act as replenishable plasma mirrors with only 11–24 nm of added wavefront error and film formation rates up to 0.5 Hz, making them a viable alternati

desk verdict Solid wavefront and pointing data for the 8CB windmill plasma mirror, but the headline repetition-rate claim is overstated: the paper's own table caps reliable formation near 0.3–0.4 Hz, and the 0.5 Hz number relies on an untested 12-arm scaling. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.18448 v2 pith:HNRXVN6A submitted 2025-09-22 physics.optics physics.plasm-ph

A. Vazquez , A. Jewell , M. Cole , A. Abdi , T. K. Le , A. McIlvenny , N. Czapla , L. Russell
show 11 more authors
A. Picksley A. J. Gonsalves K. Nakamura D. W. Schumacher Z. Eisentraut F. Mazzini C. B. Schroeder J. van Tilborg J. Osterhoff E. Esarey L. Obst-Huebl
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.plasm-ph
keywords 8CBliquidcrystalfilmplasmamirrorwavefronterrorformationreliabilitylaser-plasmaacceleratorsmecticphasepointingstability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Free-standing films of the liquid crystal 8CB, produced by a 'windmill' wiper device, are claimed to be a viable replenishable plasma mirror for high-repetition-rate, staged laser-plasma accelerators. The central quantitative claim is that a fresh film adds only 11–24 nm RMS of wavefront error to a reflected beam over a 2 mm aperture—well below the ~40 nm intrinsic wavefront error of the petawatt laser they would reflect. The paper also reports film formation success of 94% at 0.1 Hz, dropping to 52% at 0.5 Hz, and film-to-film pointing fluctuations of 180–400 µrad, with the vertical component already meeting the 150 µrad tolerance for staging. The authors argue these results, combined with prior demonstrations of high-fluence reflection and negligible electron emittance growth, make 8CB films a practical alternative to tape-drive plasma mirrors. If correct, this would enable rep-rated, low-debris coupling of laser-plasma accelerator stages.

What carries the argument

The windmill film-formation device: a 12-arm rotor fitted with 11 mm square lens-tissue wipers saturated with 8CB and dragged across a 10 mm aperture, depositing a smectic-phase meniscus that self-levels into an ultra-thin, optically smooth free-standing film. The smectic phase of 8CB (21.5–33.5 °C) enables films from ~10 nm to 50 µm thick with a flat central region of 3–4 mm. The diagnostic chain uses a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor with the lowest-order Zernike terms removed, plus a far-field camera for centroid-based pointing stability, to isolate the film's intrinsic aberrations.

What would settle it

Operate the windmill with all 12 arms at 0.4–0.5 Hz in the same vacuum test chamber and measure film formation success over 50 consecutive wipes. If the success rate falls below the linearly scaled prediction (e.g., below the 78% observed at 0.4 Hz with 4–6 arms) or the reflected wavefront RMS exceeds the 40 nm intrinsic laser wavefront, the paper's central claim fails. A second falsifier: direct high-power reflection measurement of the film's wavefront to test whether the low-power surface quality is preserved when the film becomes a plasma.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that windmill-formed 8CB films combine sub-25 nm RMS wavefront quality with rep-rated replenishment. Measured with a low-power 532 nm probe and a Shack-Hartmann sensor after removing piston, tip, tilt, and focus, the films add 11–24 nm RMS over a 2 mm central region—about one-quarter to one-half the intrinsic 40 nm wavefront error of the petawatt drive laser. Film-to-film angular fluctuation is 180–400 µrad total, dominated by the horizontal axis, with the vertical component already satisfying the 150 µrad requirement. The windmill device forms films reliably at 0.1–0.4 Hz, with success dropping to ~52% at 0.5 Hz; the paper attributes the drop to wiper speed and suggests tha

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that film-formation success measured with only four to six of the twelve windmill arms scales linearly to the full twelve-arm rotor; the paper itself flags this assumption ('only four to six arms were utilized'), and if arm-to-arm effects degrade success, the claimed up-to-0.5 Hz replenishment rate fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 11–24 nm RMS added wavefront error is below the ~40 nm intrinsic wavefront of the petawatt drive laser, so the film would not become the dominant aberration source in a staged accelerator.
  • Reliable film formation at 0.4 Hz in the current test configuration suggests that a full 12-arm windmill could approach 1 Hz, matching the repetition rate of many high-power laser facilities.
  • The predominantly horizontal pointing fluctuation (180–400 µrad) can be actively corrected with a hexapod tip/tilt mount; a manual correction test showed ~10x improvement, which would bring the error to tens of µrad.
  • Ultra-thin 8CB films (down to ~20 nm) cause negligible emittance growth for transmitted electron beams, unlike 15 µm tape drives, preserving beam quality in staged LPA experiments.
  • The low debris and low material cost of 8CB films offer a practical, replenishable alternative to tape-based plasma mirrors for sustained rep-rated operation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The film-formation frequencies in Table I were measured with only 4–6 of the 12 arms installed; the paper assumes a linear scaling to 12 arms. If wiper-to-wiper interference or uneven LC saturation emerges at higher arm counts, the projected 0.5 Hz operation would need to be revised downward.
  • The wavefront quality was characterized at low power; extrapolating to a high-power plasma mirror assumes that the film's surface does not deform under the strong electric field of the ionizing laser pulse. The paper cites prior high-power reflection experiments as support, but does not measure wavefront under those conditions.
  • The abstract and Table I disagree on success-rate numbers (97% at 2.7 mm/s vs 94% at 0.1 Hz, and 45% at 10.8 mm/s vs 52% at 0.5 Hz); reconciling these numbers would clarify the actual operating envelope.
  • If the astigmatism-dominated wavefront structure is stable from film to film, adaptive optics could flatten it further, potentially pushing the added wavefront error below the 11 nm floor reported here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a low-power optical characterization of free-standing 8CB liquid-crystal films formed by a motorized 'windmill' device, intended as replenishable plasma mirrors for staged laser-plasma accelerators. For each of several temperatures and film-formation speeds, the authors measured the reflected wavefront with a Shack-Hartmann sensor after subtracting a flat-mirror reference, recorded far-field centroid fluctuations to infer film-to-film pointing stability, and counted film-formation successes over 50 attempts per condition. The main positive results are an added wavefront RMS of 11–24 nm over a 2 mm aperture (below the ~40 nm intrinsic wavefront of the BELLA PW laser), film-to-film angular fluctuations of roughly 180–400 µrad, and per-wipe formation success decreasing from 94% at the lowest tested speed to 52% at the highest. The paper concludes that the device provides 'consistent and reliable film formation at repetition rates up to 0.5 Hz' and that 8CB windmill films are promising for rep-rated plasma mirrors.

Significance. If the quantitative results are correct, the paper makes a useful contribution to an active technical area: it provides the first systematic, 50-film-per-condition statistics for windmill-formed 8CB films, with a clearly described reference-subtracted Shack-Hartmann method, far-field pointing diagnostics, and openly available data on Zenodo. The measured 11–24 nm RMS wavefront quality is genuinely encouraging and, if it transfers to high-power operation, would satisfy the wavefront budget for the BELLA PW staging experiment. The angular-stability data, while exceeding the stated 150 µrad tolerance, are honest and accompanied by a plausible active-correction strategy. However, the paper's central repetition-rate claim is overstated: the data show that the per-wipe success probability drops to about 52% at the highest speed, and the effective successful film-formation rate is roughly 0.25 Hz, which is what the abstract itself reports. The additional reliance on an untested 4–6-arm to 12-arm scaling further weakens the 'up to 0.5 Hz' statement. The contribution is valuable but needs substantial revision of the claims and a clearer presentation of what was actually measured.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section V and Abstract vs. Table I] The conclusion states 'consistent and reliable film formation at repetition rates up to 0.5 Hz,' but this is contradicted by the manuscript's own data. Table I reports a 52% formation success at 0.5 Hz, and Section IV itself states that reliability 'decreases to approximately 50% at 0.5 Hz' and that reliable operation was demonstrated only up to 0.4 Hz. The abstract's 'maximum effective film formation frequency of approximately 0.25 Hz' is consistent with p×f ≈ 0.52×0.5 Hz, but the conclusion does not use this effective rate. The central claim should be reworded to reflect the measured per-wipe success probabilities and the resulting effective successful-formation rate.
  2. [Section II, Table I, and frequency scaling] The manuscript states that 'only four to six arms were utilized' in the test chamber, yet all quoted frequencies (Table I and Section III) are defined as the rate 'with all 12 wipers attached.' The conversion from measured per-wipe success with 4–6 arms to a 12-arm repetition rate assumes that per-wipe success depends only on wiper speed and that rotor dynamics, vibration, thermal loading, and arm-to-arm interference are unchanged. This assumption is untested. If, for example, 12 arms introduce shorter inter-wipe intervals or different mechanical coupling, the per-wipe success at the 0.5 Hz setting could be lower than the reported 52%. The manuscript should either present the results as per-wipe success at specified wiper speeds without the 12-arm frequency label, or provide measurements or modeling that justify the scaling.
  3. [Abstract and Table I: numerical inconsistency] The abstract reports '>97% formation success at 2.7 mm/s film-forming speeds' and '45% at 10.8 mm/s,' but Table I lists 94% at 0.1 Hz and 52% at 0.5 Hz. No mapping from wiper speed (mm/s) to the tabulated frequency (Hz) is given, so the reader cannot verify whether these two sets of numbers describe the same operating points. For example, if 2.7 mm/s corresponds to 0.1 Hz, then the abstract's 97% and Table I's 94% conflict; if the correspondence is different, that mapping needs to be stated explicitly. This inconsistency undermines the quantitative reliability claims.
  4. [Section IV, pointing-stability extrapolation] The statement 'Based on our scan of operating speeds, we do not expect that the amount of angular fluctuation will significantly grow when further increasing the wiping speed towards 1 Hz' is an unsupported extrapolation beyond the measured range (0.1–0.5 Hz). The data show a clear downward trend in formation success with speed, and pointing stability may degrade similarly. This sentence should be labeled as a hypothesis or removed, since the manuscript presents no measurements above 0.5 Hz.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III, Figure 3] The error bars in Figure 3(a) represent the standard deviation over 50 films, but no confidence intervals are given for the success probabilities in Table I. With only 50 attempts per speed, the binomial uncertainty is substantial (e.g., 94% has a 95% Clopper-Pearson interval of roughly 83–99%). Reporting uncertainties would strengthen the reliability claims.
  2. [Section II] The statement 'The intrinsic angular fluctuation of the diagnostic beam incident onto the LC film is significantly smaller than these measured values and is neglected' is not quantified. Please provide a measured upper bound for this intrinsic jitter.
  3. [Section II and Figure 2] The wavefront analysis removes piston, tip, tilt, and focus terms. This is reasonable for isolating higher-order aberrations, but the text should explicitly note that the reported 11–24 nm RMS therefore excludes defocus and pointing, which are instead addressed by the angular-stability measurement. As written, a reader might otherwise compare the wavefront RMS directly with the 40 nm BELLA PW budget without realizing that these low-order terms are not included.
  4. [Section IV] The sentence 'These values are also within the same order of magnitude to the average 290 µrad fluctuations reported for tape drives' is slightly ambiguous, since the manuscript reports 180–400 µrad; 'same order of magnitude' is appropriate, but the comparison should be stated more precisely.
  5. [General] There are occasional typographical errors (e.g., 'slightly separated from the back surface' should likely be 'slightly separated from the back surface of the windmill' or similar; 'multi-Gev' should be 'multi-GeV'). A careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Direct measurements throughout; no circular derivation found; mild self-citation for transferability only.

full rationale

The paper's quantitative claims—wavefront RMS of 11–24 nm, formation success rates in Table I, and pointing fluctuations of 180–400 µrad—are direct measurements using a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor, a far-field camera, and a flat gold mirror reference. No parameter is fitted to the target claim, and no claimed output is used as an input. The 'up to 0.5 Hz' frequency label is constructed by assuming a 12-arm rotor while only 4–6 arms were used, but this is an unvalidated scaling assumption (a correctness risk), not a circular derivation; the underlying per-wipe success rates are directly measured. The only self-referential element is the appeal to prior high-power LC film experiments (Czapla et al. 2025 and Zingale et al. 2021) to argue that low-power surface quality transfers to plasma operation. One of these (Czapla) has overlapping authors, so it is a mild self-citation. However, this citation is not load-bearing for the central measured values, which are compared independently against external benchmarks (BELLA PW intrinsic ~40 nm RMS, 150 µrad pointing requirement, and tape surface 43±9 nm RMS). The central derivation chain is therefore self-contained, and the paper does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental characterization; the 'free parameters' are measurement choices rather than fitted model constants. The listed axioms are load-bearing domain premises the authors invoke without independent verification.

free parameters (1)
  • Wavefront evaluation aperture = 2 mm diameter central region
    The headline 11-24 nm RMS is measured over a 2 mm beam at the film center; the abstract notes a 3 mm region gives <50 nm, so the aperture choice materially affects the reported quality number.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Low-power diagnostic measurements are representative of high-power plasma reflection conditions
    Section IV states that consistency with prior high-power experiments indicates the low-power surface quality is representative, but no direct high-power wavefront verification is provided.
  • domain assumption Film formation rate scales linearly from 4-6 tested arms to the full 12-arm configuration
    Section II: 'we assume the repetition rate of film formation refers to a wiper speed used where films are formed with all 12 wipers attached'; only 4-6 arms were used in testing.
  • domain assumption Intrinsic diagnostic beam angular jitter is negligible
    Figure 3 caption states the intrinsic angular fluctuation of the diagnostic beam is significantly smaller than measured values and is neglected, without showing a supporting measurement.
  • domain assumption 8CB smectic phase boundaries (21.5-33.5 C) from prior literature are correct
    Section II cites Poole et al. for phase transition temperatures; the operating regime and temperature control depend on these boundaries.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stability and optical quality of "windmill"-formed 8CB liquid crystal films for replenishable plasma mirrors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HNRXVN6A

@misc{pith2026250918448,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stability and optical quality of "windmill"-formed 8CB liquid crystal films for replenishable plasma mirrors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HNRXVN6A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.18448}
}
read the original abstract

Liquid crystal (LC) film plasma mirrors (PMs) based on 4-octyl-4'-cyanobiphenyl (8CB) are an enabling technology for reflecting high-fluence laser pulses. These freestanding LC films can achieve high optical quality and are well-suited for rep-rated applications, as motorized devices continuously replenish films over an aperture following each destructive laser shot. However, a systematic characterization of film quality as a function of seminal operating conditions had not yet been performed for the LC "windmill" version of the device, which aims to match the repetition rate of an existing "spinning disk" (SDI) version and the angular stability of the "linear slider" (LSTI) version. We determined the 8CB film quality using low-power wavefront measurements, and studied the film-to-film wavefront stability and formation reliability. The film-formation reliability of 8CB LC films demonstrated >97% formation success at 2.7 mm/s film-forming speeds, but decreased to 45% at 10.8 mm/s. These reliability numbers will inform future designs to reach Hz-level repetition rates and beyond. Depending on area-of-interest within the 10 mm diameter film, the added wavefront root-mean-squared (RMS) variation was as small as 12 nm for a 2 mm diameter region, and <50 nm for a 3 mm diameter region. Within the optimal 21-22 degrees C operating regime, pointing fluctuations remained at or below 0.5 mrad. With a maximum effective film formation frequency of approximately 0.25 Hz, these results establish windmill-formed 8CB films as promising candidates to pursue next-iteration improvements towards rep-rated plasma-mirror operation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.18448 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Schematic layout of the diagnostic setup with diagnostic beam size at important locations. (b) Side view of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Measured wavefront of a liquid crystal (LC) film, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Characterization of the optical quality and angular stability of liquid crystal (LC) films formed with the windmill, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    author author C. N. \ Danson ,\ title title Petawatt and exawatt class lasers worldwide , \ 10.1017/hpl.2019.36 journal journal High Power Laser Science and Engineering \ volume 7 ,\ pages e54 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1017/hpl.2019.36 2019

  5. [5]

    author author J. W. \ Yoon ,\ title title Realization of laser intensity over > 10^ 23 W/cm ^2 , \ 10.1364/OPTICA.420520 journal journal Optica \ volume 8 ,\ pages 630--635 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.420520 2021

  6. [6]

    Tajima \ and\ author J

    author author T. Tajima \ and\ author J. M. \ Dawson ,\ title title Laser electron accelerator , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.267 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 43 ,\ pages 267--270 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.267 1979

  7. [7]

    author author E. Esarey ,\ title title Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1229 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 81 ,\ pages 1229--1285 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1229 2009

  8. [8]

    author author S. Steinke ,\ title title Multistage coupling of independent laser-plasma accelerators , \ 10.1038/nature16525 journal journal Nature \ volume 530 ,\ pages 190--193 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nature16525 2016

Show all 28 references
  1. [9]

    Thaury ,\ title title Plasma mirrors for ultrahigh-intensity optics , \ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 3 ,\ pages 424--429 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    author author C. Thaury ,\ title title Plasma mirrors for ultrahigh-intensity optics , \ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 3 ,\ pages 424--429 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  2. [10]

    author author T. Sokollik ,\ title title Tape-drive based plasma mirror , \ in\ 10.1063/1.3520330 booktitle AIP Conference Proceedings ,\ Vol.\ volume 1299 \ ( year 2010 )\ pp.\ pages 233--237 NoStop

    2010 doi

  3. [11]

    author author L. Obst ,\ title title On-shot characterization of single plasma mirror temporal contrast improvement , \ 10.1088/1361-6587/aab3bb journal journal Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion \ volume 60 ,\ pages 054007 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    author author K. Nakamura ,\ title title Diagnostics, control and performance parameters for the BELLA high repetition rate Petawatt class laser , \ 10.1109/JQE.2017.2708601 journal journal IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics \ volume 53 ,\ pages 1200121 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  5. [13]

    author author W. P. \ Leemans , author B. Nagler , author A. J. \ Gonsalves , author C. T \'o th , author K. Nakamura , author C. G. R. \ Geddes , author E. Esarey , author C. B. \ Schroeder , \ and\ author S. M. \ Hooker ,\ title title GeV electron beams from a centimetre-sca...

    2006 doi

  6. [14]

    van Tilborg ,\ title title Active plasma lensing for relativistic laser-plasma-accelerated electron beams , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.184802 journal journal Phys

    author author J. van Tilborg ,\ title title Active plasma lensing for relativistic laser-plasma-accelerated electron beams , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.184802 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 115 ,\ pages 184802 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  7. [16]

    author author J. Stackhouse ,\ title title Preparations on the BELLA PW second beamline for staging experiments , \ in\ 10.1109/AAC55212.2022.10822940 booktitle 2022 IEEE Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop (AAC) \ ( publisher IEEE ,\ year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  8. [17]

    author author S. K. \ Barber ,\ title title A compact, high resolution energy, and emittance diagnostic for electron beams using active plasma lenses , \ 10.1063/5.0005114 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 116 ,\ pages 234108 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  9. [18]

    author author B. H. \ Shaw ,\ title title Reflectance characterization of tape-based plasma mirrors , \ 10.1063/1.4954242 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 23 ,\ pages 063118 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  10. [19]

    author author A. Zingale ,\ title title Emittance preserving thin film plasma mirrors for GeV scale laser plasma accelerators , \ 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.24.121301 journal journal Physical Review Accelerators and Beams \ volume 24 ,\ pages 121301 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  11. [20]

    author author N. Czapla ,\ title title A renewable double plasma mirror for Petawatt -class lasers , \ 10.1038/s41598-025-07016-3 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 15 ,\ pages 21115 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  12. [21]

    author author P. L. \ Poole ,\ title title Experiment and simulation of novel liquid crystal plasma mirrors for high contrast, intense laser pulses , \ 10.1038/srep32041 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 6 ,\ pages 32041 ( year 2016 a ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  13. [22]

    author author P. L. \ Poole ,\ title title Moderate repetition rate ultra-intense laser targets and optics using variable thickness liquid crystal films , \ 10.1063/1.4964841 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 109 ,\ pages 151109 ( year 2016 b ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  14. [23]

    author author P. L. \ Poole ,\ title Liquid Crystals as High Repetition Rate Targets for Ultra Intense Laser Systems ,\ @noop type Ph.D. thesis ,\ school The Ohio State University ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  15. [24]

    author author D. W. \ Schumacher ,\ title title Liquid crystal targets and plasma mirrors for laser based ion acceleration , \ 10.1088/1748-0221/12/04/C04023 journal journal Journal of Instrumentation \ volume 12 ,\ pages C04023 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  16. [25]

    Stability and optical quality of liquid crystal films as high repetition rate plasma mirrors in staged laser-plasma accelerators

    author author A. Vazquez et al. ,\ 10.5281/zenodo.17138269 journal journal Data Sets for "Stability and optical quality of liquid crystal films as high repetition rate plasma mirrors in staged laser-plasma accelerators" \ 10.5281/zenodo.17138269 NoStop

    doi

  17. [26]

    author author P. Hadjisolomou ,\ title title Preplasma effects on laser ion generation from thin foil targets , \ 10.1063/1.5124457 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 27 ,\ pages 013107 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  18. [27]

    author author G. A. \ Mourou ,\ title title Optics in the relativistic regime , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.309 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 78 ,\ pages 309--371 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  19. [28]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number orga...

    2010

  20. [29]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number orga...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.