pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.19264 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-23 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Jittering jets promote dust formation in core-collapse supernovae

Noam Soker (Technion , Israel) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 14:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords core-collapse supernovaedust formationjittering jetssupernova remnantsCassiopeia ASN 1987ACrab Nebulaexplosion mechanism
0
0 comments X

The pith

Jittering jets that explode core-collapse supernovae also shape and boost dust formation in the remnants.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that the jets driving core-collapse supernova explosions interact with the star's core and envelope in ways that increase the amount of dust produced and dictate its distribution. Evidence comes from dust-rich structures in Cassiopeia A and the Crab Nebula that appear in point-symmetric patterns, plus bipolar dust alignment with the inner ejecta in SN 1987A. These patterns were previously tied to the jittering jets explosion mechanism, implying the jets themselves promote dust formation rather than leaving it to later processes. A sympathetic reader would care because dust influences chemical enrichment, cooling, and planet formation across galaxies, so linking it directly to the explosion mechanism refines models of supernova outcomes.

Core claim

Within the jittering jets explosion mechanism, the properties of the exploding jets and their interaction with the core and envelope determine the amount of dust formed and its morphology, as shown by jet-shaped, point-symmetric dust distributions in Cas A and the Crab and bipolar dust following the inner ejecta in SN 1987A.

What carries the argument

Jittering jets explosion mechanism (JJEM), in which jets with changing directions explode the star and their interactions promote dust formation in point-symmetric and bipolar morphologies.

If this is right

  • Dust formation in CCSNRs becomes a direct outcome of the explosion jets instead of a separate process.
  • Observed dust morphologies reflect the jittering directions of the explosion jets.
  • The JJEM gains support because it accounts for both the explosion and the resulting dust properties.
  • Exploding jets participate in an additional process: enhancing dust yields and structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Jet-dust links could appear in other explosive transients if similar jittering occurs.
  • Simulations of jet-envelope interactions might now predict specific dust masses and shapes for comparison with new observations.
  • Dust budgets in galaxies could be revised upward if most core-collapse events involve such jet enhancement.
  • Future multi-wavelength mapping of more remnants could test whether dust patterns consistently trace early jet activity.

Load-bearing premise

The point-symmetric and bipolar dust morphologies seen in Cas A, the Crab, and SN 1987A are produced by the same jittering jets that explode the star rather than by later circumstellar material interactions or other post-explosion shaping.

What would settle it

A core-collapse supernova remnant whose dust shows no jet-like or point-symmetric patterns, or clear evidence that dust forms in large quantities without any jet signatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.19264 by Israel), Noam Soker (Technion.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A JWST image of Cassiopeia A that Bear & Soker (2025) adapted from Milisavljevic et al. (2024) and added their identifications of the point-symmetrical morphol￾ogy (lower panel). I added five red arrows on the upper panel pointing at dust-rich structural features that are part of pairs in the point-symmetric morphology. Bear & Soker (2025) mark the arc at the south with a dashed-yellow line and copied it t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An image of the Crab Nebula that Shishkin & Soker (2024) adapted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two images of ALMA and JWST observations, at the same scale, emphasizing the dust elongated structure along the main symmetry axis of SN 1987A, i.e., the axis of the bipolar ‘Keyhole’ structure. (a) An image adapted from Bouchet et al. (2024). Colors represent the JWST MIRI F560W image, and the contours show the ALMA 315 GHz image, highlighting cold dust emission. Axes are right as￾cension, with ticks on t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

I find that the dust morphologies in some core-collapse supernova (CCSN) remnants (CCSNRs) possess jet-shaped morphologies, and propose that the properties of the jets that explode the CCSNe and their interaction with the core and envelope (if it exists) are among the factors that determine the amount of dust formed and its morphology. I find that some of the dust-rich structures in the CCSNRs Cassiopeia A and the Crab Nebula are distributed in point-symmetric morphologies, and that the dust in SN 1987A follows the bipolar morphology of the inner ejecta. Earlier studies attributed these morphologies in CCSNRs to jet shaping within the jittering jets explosion mechanism (JJEM). These dust morphologies suggest, within the framework of the JJEM, that exploding jets enhance dust formation in CCSNRs. This study contributes to the diversity of processes in which CCSN exploding jets are involved and to establishing the JJEM as the primary explosion mechanism of CCSNe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript observes that dust in core-collapse supernova remnants (Cas A, Crab Nebula, SN 1987A) exhibits point-symmetric and bipolar morphologies. Within the jittering jets explosion mechanism (JJEM) framework, it proposes that the properties of the exploding jets and their interaction with the core and envelope are among the factors that determine the amount of dust formed and its morphology, thereby contributing to the diversity of jet roles in CCSNe and supporting JJEM as the primary explosion mechanism.

Significance. If the morphological associations are confirmed to trace explosion-time jets and if those jets are shown to enhance dust formation, the work would link the explosion mechanism directly to dust production and add an observational consistency argument for the JJEM. The paper highlights an extension of jet involvement beyond dynamics but supplies no new quantitative modeling or exclusion of alternatives.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The claim that exploding jets enhance dust formation and determine its morphology rests on qualitative morphological similarity (point-symmetric dust in Cas A and Crab; bipolar dust in SN 1987A) but presents no hydrodynamic simulations, dust-formation chemical-kinetics calculations, or quantitative comparison of dust yields and grain-size distributions between jet-inclusive and spherical models.
  2. Main text: The interpretation that the observed dust morphologies directly trace the jittering jets that exploded the star assumes these structures are not produced by later ejecta-CSM interactions or reverse shocks; the manuscript supplies no arguments, hydrodynamic tests, or observational discriminants that exclude such post-explosion shaping mechanisms.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and discussion could more explicitly separate new morphological associations from interpretations that rely on the author's prior JJEM papers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. Our work is an observational and interpretive study that links observed dust morphologies in CCSNRs to the jittering jets explosion mechanism (JJEM) based on qualitative similarities and prior literature. We address each major comment below, clarifying the scope of the paper while making targeted revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The claim that exploding jets enhance dust formation and determine its morphology rests on qualitative morphological similarity (point-symmetric dust in Cas A and Crab; bipolar dust in SN 1987A) but presents no hydrodynamic simulations, dust-formation chemical-kinetics calculations, or quantitative comparison of dust yields and grain-size distributions between jet-inclusive and spherical models.

    Authors: We agree that the analysis is qualitative and does not include new hydrodynamic simulations, chemical-kinetics modeling, or quantitative yield comparisons. The manuscript is not a modeling study; it proposes an observational connection within the established JJEM framework, building on earlier works that attribute point-symmetric and bipolar structures to jet activity. Quantitative dust-formation calculations in jet-driven explosions would be a valuable extension but lie outside the present scope. We have revised the abstract to explicitly note the qualitative basis of the proposal and its reliance on morphological associations reported in the literature. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Main text: The interpretation that the observed dust morphologies directly trace the jittering jets that exploded the star assumes these structures are not produced by later ejecta-CSM interactions or reverse shocks; the manuscript supplies no arguments, hydrodynamic tests, or observational discriminants that exclude such post-explosion shaping mechanisms.

    Authors: The referee is correct that we do not supply new hydrodynamic tests or explicit discriminants to rule out all post-explosion shaping. In the revised manuscript we have added a paragraph acknowledging that ejecta-CSM interactions and reverse shocks can modify remnant morphology at later times. We note, however, that the high degree of point symmetry observed in Cas A and the Crab, together with the alignment of dust structures with known jet axes and the fact that significant dust formation occurs within the first few years, is more naturally explained by early jet activity during the explosion phase as described in the JJEM. Full exclusion of alternatives would require dedicated multi-dimensional simulations, which we identify as an important direction for future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Dust morphologies interpreted as support for JJEM within self-referential framework from author's prior work

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "Earlier studies attributed these morphologies in CCSNRs to jet shaping within the jittering jets explosion mechanism (JJEM). These dust morphologies suggest, within the framework of the JJEM, that exploding jets enhance dust formation in CCSNRs. This study contributes to the diversity of processes in which CCSN exploding jets are involved and to establishing the JJEM as the primary explosion mechanism of CCSNe."

    The morphologies are first attributed to jets by earlier (self-cited) JJEM work; the present paper then uses those same morphologies, interpreted inside the JJEM framework, to claim that jets promote dust formation and to bolster JJEM itself. The support is therefore internal to the framework rather than an external validation.

full rationale

The paper observes jet-shaped dust morphologies in Cas A, Crab, and SN 1987A, then concludes these indicate exploding jets enhance dust formation and help establish JJEM as the primary CCSN mechanism. This chain is load-bearing on prior attribution of the same morphologies to jittering jets in the author's earlier JJEM papers. The interpretation is explicitly 'within the framework of the JJEM,' so the data are read as consistent with the model rather than providing an independent test that excludes post-explosion CSM shaping or other processes. No new hydrodynamic or chemical calculations are supplied to show higher dust yields or preserved symmetries when jets are included. The central claim therefore reduces to a consistency argument inside the self-cited theoretical framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the jittering jets explosion mechanism is the correct description of core-collapse supernovae and that the cited dust morphologies are causally produced by those jets. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in this manuscript.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The jittering jets explosion mechanism (JJEM) is the primary explosion mechanism of core-collapse supernovae.
    Invoked throughout the text as the framework within which the dust morphologies are interpreted.
  • domain assumption Point-symmetric and bipolar dust distributions in CCSNRs are shaped by the exploding jets rather than by post-explosion processes.
    Stated as the basis for attributing dust formation to the jets.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5697 in / 1586 out tokens · 55830 ms · 2026-05-18T14:02:06.954254+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    G., Dwek, E., Kober, G., Rho, J., & Hwang, U

    Arendt, R. G., Dwek, E., Kober, G., Rho, J., & Hwang, U. 2014, ApJ, 786, 55, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/55

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/1/55 2014

  2. [2]

    2025, PASJ, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf041

    Bamba, A., Agarwal, M., Vink, J., et al. 2025, PASJ, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf041

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf041 2025

  3. [3]

    J., Krause, O., Swinyard, B

    Barlow, M. J., Krause, O., Swinyard, B. M., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L138, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014585 Jittering jets promote dust formation in CCSNe5

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014585 2010

  4. [4]

    2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 045008, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/adc24e

    Bear, E., Shishkin, D., & Soker, N. 2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 045008, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/adc24e

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/adc24e 2025

  5. [5]

    2025, NewA, 114, 102307, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2024.102307

    Bear, E., & Soker, N. 2025, NewA, 114, 102307, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2024.102307

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2024.102307 2025

  6. [6]

    P., & Kasen, D

    Boccioli, L., Vartanyan, D., O’Connor, E. P., & Kasen, D. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 3885, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf963

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf963 2025

  7. [7]

    2024, ApJ, 965, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2770

    Bouchet, P., Gastaud, R., Coulais, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 965, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2770

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2770 2024

  8. [8]

    2025, PASP, 137, 054201, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/add08e

    Braudo, J., Michaelis, A., Akashi, M., & Soker, N. 2025, PASP, 137, 054201, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/add08e

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/add08e 2025

  9. [9]

    L., et al

    Cigan, P., Matsuura, M., Gomez, H. L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4b46

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4b46 2019

  10. [10]

    C., Wesson, R., Fox, O

    Clayton, G. C., Wesson, R., Fox, O. D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.01574, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.01574 De Looze, I., Barlow, M. J., Swinyard, B. M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 3309, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2837 Eggenberger Andersen, O., O’Connor, E., Andresen, H., da Silva Schneider, A., & Couch, S. M. 2025, ApJ, 980, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada899

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.01574 2025

  11. [11]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.15397, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.15397

    Gomez, S., Temim, T., Fox, O., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.15397, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.15397

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.15397 2024

  12. [12]

    2020, MNRAS, 499, 1154, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2898

    Mandel, I. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 1154, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2898 2020

  13. [13]

    2025, ApJ, 979, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada146

    Chen, L.-W. 2025, ApJ, 979, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada146

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada146 2025

  14. [14]

    2025, MNRAS, 541, 116, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf865

    Imasheva, L., Janka, H.-T., & Weiss, A. 2025, MNRAS, 541, 116, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf865

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf865 2025

  15. [15]

    Janka, H. T. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.14836, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.14836

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.14836

  16. [16]

    2025b, Video Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana, 2, 46, doi: 10.36116/VIDEOMEM 2.2025.46

    Janka, T. 2025b, Video Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana, 2, 46, doi: 10.36116/VIDEOMEM 2.2025.46

    work page doi:10.36116/videomem 2025

  17. [17]

    D., Barlow, M

    Kirchschlager, F., Schmidt, F. D., Barlow, M. J., De Looze, I., & Sartorio, N. S. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 5042, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad290

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad290 2023

  18. [18]

    2025, NewA, 116, 102346, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2024.102346

    Kumar, A. 2025, NewA, 116, 102346, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2024.102346

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2024.102346 2025

  19. [19]

    2008, ApJS, 174, 426, doi: 10.1086/522623

    Churchwell, E. 2008, ApJS, 174, 426, doi: 10.1086/522623

    work page doi:10.1086/522623 2008

  20. [20]

    Laplace, E., Schneider, F. R. N., & Podsiadlowski, P. 2025, A&A, 695, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451077

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451077 2025

  21. [21]

    2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 085001, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/addeb4

    Lu, T., Long, X., Sun, W., et al. 2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 085001, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/addeb4

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/addeb4 2025

  22. [22]

    Maltsev, K., Schneider, F. R. N., Mandel, I., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554931 Mart´ ınez-Gonz´ alez, S. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.08887. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08887

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554931 2025

  23. [23]

    G., et al

    Matsuura, M., Boyer, M., Arendt, R. G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 3625, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1032

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1032 2024

  24. [24]

    P., Sim, S

    Maunder, T., Callan, F. P., Sim, S. A., Heger, A., & M¨uller, B. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.20829, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.20829

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.20829 2024

  25. [25]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.19727

    Medler, K., Ashall, C., Hoeflich, P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.19727, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.19727

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.19727 2025

  26. [26]

    2024, ApJL, 965, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad324b M¨ uller, E., Fryxell, B., & Arnett, D

    Milisavljevic, D., Temim, T., De Looze, I., et al. 2024, ApJL, 965, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad324b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad324b 2024

  27. [27]

    2025, PASJ, 77, L9, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf007

    Mori, K., Takiwaki, T., Kotake, K., & Horiuchi, S. 2025, PASJ, 77, L9, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf007

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf007 2025

  28. [28]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.09419

    Mukazhanov, O. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.09419. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09419 M¨uller, B., Heger, A., & Powell, J. 2025, PhRvL, 134, 071403, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.071403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.071403 2025

  29. [29]

    2025, MNRAS, 536, 280, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2611

    Nakamura, K., Takiwaki, T., Matsumoto, J., & Kotake, K. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 280, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2611

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2611 2025

  30. [30]

    2025b, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 699, A305, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554862

    Orlando, S., Miceli, M., Ono, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A305, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554862

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554862 2025

  31. [31]

    A., & Coughlin, E

    Paradiso, D. A., & Coughlin, E. R. 2025, ApJ, 985, 173, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adce6f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adce6f 2025

  32. [32]

    D., Arias, M., Barlow, M

    Priestley, F. D., Arias, M., Barlow, M. J., & De Looze, I. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 3163, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3195

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3195 2022

  33. [33]

    G., Janka, H.-T., & Fiorillo, D

    Raffelt, G. G., Janka, H.-T., & Fiorillo, D. F. G. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.16306. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16306

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.20574, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.20574

    Sarangi, A., Zsiros, S., Szalai, T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.20574, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.20574

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.20574 2025

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Shahbandeh, M., Sarangi, A., Temim, T., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 6048, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1681

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1681 2023

  36. [36]

    D., Temim, T., et al

    Shahbandeh, M., Fox, O. D., Temim, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 262, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adce77

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adce77 2025

  37. [37]

    2025, PhRvD, 111, 123017, doi: 10.1103/msy2-fwhx

    Shibata, M., Fujibayashi, S., Wanajo, S., et al. 2025, PhRvD, 111, 123017, doi: 10.1103/msy2-fwhx

    work page doi:10.1103/msy2-fwhx 2025

  38. [38]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.21548

    Shishkin, D., Bear, E., & Soker, N. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.21548. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21548

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    2024, ApJ, 975, 281, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8138

    Shishkin, D., Kaye, R., & Soker, N. 2024, ApJ, 975, 281, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8138

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8138 2024

  40. [40]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.07938

    Shishkin, D., & Soker, N. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.07938. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07938

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    2023, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23, 095020, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ace9b3 —

    Soker, N. 2023, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23, 095020, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ace9b3 —. 2024a, Universe, 10, 458, doi: 10.3390/universe10120458 —. 2024b, NewA, 107, 102154, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2023.102154 —. 2024c, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 075006, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ad4fc2 6Soker —. 2024d, Galaxies, 12, 29, doi: 10.33...

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ace9b3 2023

  42. [42]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.10843, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.10843

    Soker, N., & Akashi, M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.10843, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.10843

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.10843 2025

  43. [43]

    2025, PhRvD, 111, 063042, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063042

    Sykes, B., & M ¨uller, B. 2025, PhRvD, 111, 063042, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063042

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.063042 2025

  44. [44]

    2025, A&A, 697, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451470

    Szalai, T., Zs´ ıros, S., Jencson, J., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451470

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451470 2025

  45. [45]

    GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries

    Temim, T., Laming, J. M., Kavanagh, P. J., et al. 2024, ApJL, 968, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad50d1 The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, & the KAGRA Collaboration. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.18083, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.18083

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad50d1 2024

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Tinyanont, S., Fox, O. D., Shahbandeh, M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 198, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adccc0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adccc0 2025

  47. [47]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.21116, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.21116

    Tsuna, D., Fuller, J., & Lu, W. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.21116. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21116

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.16314, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.16314

    Vartanyan, D., Burrows, A., Teryoshin, L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.16314. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16314

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.04691, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.04691

    Vink, J., Agarwal, M., Bamba, A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.04691, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.04691

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.04691 2025

  50. [50]

    Wang, N. Y. N., Shishkin, D., & Soker, N. 2025

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    2025, ApJ, 986, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add889

    Wang, T., & Burrows, A. 2025, ApJ, 986, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add889

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add889 2025

  52. [52]

    Willcox, R., Schneider, F. R. N., Laplace, E., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.20787, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.20787

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20787 2025

  53. [53]

    2012, ApJ, 745, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/59

    Zhang, Y., Hsia, C.-H., & Kwok, S. 2012, ApJ, 745, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/59

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/59 2012

  54. [54]

    2009, ApJ, 706, 252, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/252

    Zhang, Y., & Kwok, S. 2009, ApJ, 706, 252, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/252

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/1/252 2009

  55. [55]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.12067

    Zhao, H., Chen, B., & Li, J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.12067. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.12067

    work page arXiv 2025