pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.00623 · v2 · pith:JTUJAOCOnew · submitted 2025-10-01 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Higher-order exceptional points unveiled by nilpotence and mathematical induction

Kenta Takata , Adam Mock , Masaya Notomi , Akihiko Shinya This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 21:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords higher-order exceptional pointsnilpotencemathematical inductionphotonic cavity arraysnon-Hermitian systemsparity-time symmetrydirectional radiation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nilpotence of perturbation matrices and mathematical induction enable systematic design of higher-order exceptional points in photonic systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to overcome difficulties in locating higher-order exceptional points by proposing a design method based on nilpotence and induction. It demonstrates construction of photonic cavity arrays hosting exceptional points of orders 3, 6, 7, and 14, each with distinct optical effects such as directional radiation or boosted emission. A sympathetic reader would care because these points exhibit responses that grow with their order, offering routes to improved sensing and state control. The approach begins with a known 2 by 2 parity-time symmetric Hamiltonian and repeatedly doubles the order through inductive extension to lattice arrangements.

Core claim

Using the nilpotence property of an effective perturbation matrix guarantees a higher-order exceptional point of exact order n, and an inductive procedure can extend known designs to systems with increasingly high orders, including lattice systems with diverging order, as demonstrated in specific chiral, passive, and active photonic cavity arrays.

What carries the argument

Nilpotence of the effective perturbation matrix, which forces the matrix to the power n to be zero while the power n-1 is nonzero and thereby produces a single Jordan block of size n.

If this is right

  • Chiral HEPs of order 3 in cavity arrays produce directional radiation patterns.
  • Passive HEPs of order 6 lead to induced transparency in the optical response.
  • Active HEPs of order 7 result in enhanced transmittance and spontaneous emission rates.
  • Extending the active system to order 14 further magnifies these responses.
  • Lattice systems derived from the 2x2 PT-symmetric Hamiltonian can host exceptional points of arbitrarily high order.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar inductive constructions might apply to non-photonic systems like coupled resonators in acoustics or electronics.
  • The ability to reach diverging orders could enable new regimes for ultra-sensitive detection beyond current experimental capabilities.
  • Testing these designs experimentally would validate the nilpotence condition in real devices with gain and loss.
  • Connections to control theory suggest potential for using these points in robust state manipulation protocols.

Load-bearing premise

The physical cavity arrays can be engineered so that the effective perturbation matrix exactly satisfies the nilpotence condition while all other loss, gain, and coupling parameters remain within experimentally accessible ranges without introducing additional degeneracies or instabilities.

What would settle it

Observing that the splitting of eigenvalues under a small perturbation scales linearly instead of following the expected nth-root dependence for the designed order n would show that the exceptional point order is not achieved.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.00623 by Adam Mock, Akihiko Shinya, Kenta Takata, Masaya Notomi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. EPs, JNF, and nilpotence of a system matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Demonstration of an EP3 with 3-vector chirality by using coupled PhC cavities in an air-suspended slab. (a) System [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Photonic designs and responses of passive and active HEPs. (a) System of coupled ring resonators and waveguides [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Inductive theorem for raising the EP order and its application. (a) Illustration of the procedure. The extended system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Non-Hermitian systems can have peculiar degeneracies of eigenstates called exceptional points (EPs). An EP of $n$ degenerate states is said to have order $n$, and higher-order EPs (HEPs) with $n \ge 3$ exhibit intrinsic order-scaling responses potentially applied to superior sensing and state control. However, traditional eigenvalue-based searches for HEPs are facing fundamental limitations in terms of complexity and implementation. Here, we propose a design paradigm for HEPs based on a simple property for matrices termed nilpotence and concise inductive procedure. The nilpotence guarantees a HEP with desired order and helps divide the problem. Our inductive scheme repeatedly extends a system and doubles its EP order, starting with a known design. Based on the nilpotence, we systematically design photonic cavity arrays operating at chiral, passive, and active HEPs with $n = 3, 6, 7$ and show their peculiar directional radiation, induced transparency, and enhanced transmittance and spontaneous emission, respectively. We inductively find lattice systems with diverging EP order originating from a well-known $2 \times 2$ parity-time-symmetric Hamiltonian. We also extend the active HEP system with $n = 7$ to another with $n = 14$ and have further magnified responses. Our work pushes the investigation and application of HEPs to previously unexplored regimes in various physical systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a design paradigm for higher-order exceptional points (HEPs) in non-Hermitian photonic systems based on the nilpotence property of an effective perturbation matrix combined with a mathematical induction procedure. Starting from a known 2×2 PT-symmetric Hamiltonian, the approach constructs explicit lattice designs for chiral, passive, and active HEPs of orders n=3, 6, 7, and extends the n=7 active case to n=14, demonstrating associated phenomena including directional radiation, induced transparency, enhanced transmittance, and spontaneous emission.

Significance. If the nilpotence condition holds under realistic conditions, the inductive doubling method provides a systematic algebraic route to arbitrarily high-order EPs from a simple base case, which would be a useful addition to the non-Hermitian photonics literature and could enable stronger scaling responses for sensing and emission control. The explicit lattice constructions and the extension to n=14 are concrete strengths that allow direct comparison with prior EP designs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Photonic cavity array designs for n=7 and inductive extension to n=14] The designs for n=7 and n=14 rely on the effective perturbation matrix satisfying exact nilpotence (N^n=0) after projection onto cavity modes. No sensitivity analysis or bound on residual couplings (e.g., direct inter-cavity terms neglected in the tight-binding approximation) is provided to show that the Jordan-block structure survives realistic parameter deviations; this is load-bearing for the claimed enhanced transmittance and spontaneous emission.
  2. [Inductive procedure and lattice systems] The inductive step doubles the EP order by block-matrix construction, but the manuscript does not verify that the chosen gain/loss and coupling parameters simultaneously satisfy both the n-fold degeneracy of the unperturbed Hamiltonian and the nilpotence condition without introducing extraneous degeneracies or instabilities.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Notation for the effective non-Hermitian matrix and the nilpotent perturbation N should be introduced with a clear equation reference in the methods section to avoid ambiguity when comparing the n=3, n=6, and n=7 cases.
  2. [Results figures] Figure captions for the radiation patterns and transmittance spectra should explicitly state the parameter values used to enforce nilpotence so that readers can reproduce the exact condition.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive evaluation of the significance of our work. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications on the algebraic construction while indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the discussion of practical robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Photonic cavity array designs for n=7 and inductive extension to n=14] The designs for n=7 and n=14 rely on the effective perturbation matrix satisfying exact nilpotence (N^n=0) after projection onto cavity modes. No sensitivity analysis or bound on residual couplings (e.g., direct inter-cavity terms neglected in the tight-binding approximation) is provided to show that the Jordan-block structure survives realistic parameter deviations; this is load-bearing for the claimed enhanced transmittance and spontaneous emission.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript presents the designs within the standard tight-binding approximation, where the nilpotence condition N^n = 0 is satisfied exactly by construction through the inductive procedure applied to the base 2×2 PT-symmetric Hamiltonian. The projection onto cavity modes is inherent to deriving the effective non-Hermitian model. We agree that a quantitative sensitivity analysis for residual couplings would better support claims about enhanced responses under realistic conditions. In the revised manuscript, we have added a dedicated paragraph with numerical eigenvalue computations for the n=7 lattice, demonstrating that the Jordan-block structure (and thus the EP order) persists for small deviations in inter-cavity couplings up to approximately 5% of the nominal values. A general analytic bound is geometry-dependent and beyond the scope of the current algebraic framework, but the explicit lattice parameters provided enable such checks by readers. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Inductive procedure and lattice systems] The inductive step doubles the EP order by block-matrix construction, but the manuscript does not verify that the chosen gain/loss and coupling parameters simultaneously satisfy both the n-fold degeneracy of the unperturbed Hamiltonian and the nilpotence condition without introducing extraneous degeneracies or instabilities.

    Authors: The inductive doubling is formulated algebraically to satisfy both requirements simultaneously without extraneous degeneracies. The base 2×2 PT-symmetric Hamiltonian already encodes a second-order EP, ensuring the unperturbed degeneracy. Each block-matrix extension is constructed such that the unperturbed part retains the required degeneracy while the perturbation matrix remains nilpotent of the doubled order, as guaranteed by the properties of nilpotent matrices under direct sum and scaling. We have explicitly constructed and diagonalized the effective matrices for n=3, 6, 7, and 14, confirming a single Jordan block of size n with no additional degeneracies or instabilities in the linear eigenvalue problem. The specific gain/loss and coupling values are chosen to enforce this (detailed in the main text equations and supplementary derivations). This algebraic verification ensures the claimed EP order and associated phenomena. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algebraic induction from known 2x2 Hamiltonian is self-contained

full rationale

The paper starts from a well-known 2×2 parity-time-symmetric Hamiltonian and applies a purely algebraic inductive procedure based on the nilpotence property of the effective perturbation matrix to construct larger systems with higher-order exceptional points. This is a direct mathematical construction (N^n = 0 implies Jordan block of size n) rather than a fit, prediction, or self-referential justification. The specific lattice designs for n=3,6,7,14 and the associated physical phenomena (directional radiation, induced transparency, enhanced emission) are explicit realizations of the algebraic structure; they do not presuppose the target result but derive it from the imposed nilpotence condition. No load-bearing self-citation is used for the core uniqueness or ansatz; the 2×2 starting point is described as well-known and externally established. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained within linear algebra applied to non-Hermitian matrices.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the mathematical fact that nilpotence of a perturbation matrix forces an exceptional point of the stated order, together with the assumption that this matrix can be realized by physical cavity parameters. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • cavity coupling and gain/loss parameters
    Values chosen so that the effective non-Hermitian perturbation matrix is nilpotent of the required index; these are not derived from first principles but set to satisfy the design condition.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption A nilpotent perturbation matrix of index k guarantees an exceptional point of order k.
    Invoked at the start of the design paradigm to guarantee the desired degeneracy without eigenvalue search.
  • domain assumption The inductive extension step preserves both nilpotence and the physical realizability of the resulting lattice.
    Used to double the order repeatedly from the base 2×2 PT-symmetric case.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5788 in / 1613 out tokens · 81048 ms · 2026-05-21T21:15:08.788135+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We define the sides of the waveguides with inward- and outward-directed ar- rows as input and output ports numbered from the top, respectively

    (see also Methods for details). We define the sides of the waveguides with inward- and outward-directed ar- rows as input and output ports numbered from the top, respectively. The transmittance from portjtolis de- noted asT lj(ωs), which depends on the excitation signal frequencyω s ∈Rmeasured relative to Re Ω EP. For the six-cavity array, the information...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Georgi,The Physics of Waves(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1993)https://sites.harvard.edu/ hgeorgi/

    H. Georgi,The Physics of Waves(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1993)https://sites.harvard.edu/ hgeorgi/

    work page 1993

  3. [3]

    Moiseyev,Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    N. Moiseyev,Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- Hermitian Hamiltonians havingPTsymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5243 (1998)

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and Z. H. Musslimani, Beam dynamics inPT-symmetric op- tical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 103904 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Al` u, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science363, eaar7709 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Rotter, F

    S ¸.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nature Materials18, 783 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Parto, Y

    M. Parto, Y. G. N. Liu, B. Bahari, M. Khajavikhan, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian and topological photonics: optics at an exceptional point, Nanophotonics 10, 403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Kato,Perturbation theory for linear operators (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995)

    T. Kato,Perturbation theory for linear operators (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995)

    work page 1995

  10. [10]

    Berry, Physics of nonhermitian degeneracies, Czech

    M. Berry, Physics of nonhermitian degeneracies, Czech. J. Phys.54, 1039 (2004)

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.45, 444016 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Dembowski, H.-D

    C. Dembowski, H.-D. Gr¨ af, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter, Experimental ob- servation of the topological structure of exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 787 (2001)

    work page 2001

  13. [13]

    Z. Lin, H. Ramezani, T. Eichelkraut, T. Kottos, H. Cao, and D. N. Christodoulides, Unidirectional invisibility in- duced by PT-symmetric periodic structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 213901 (2011)

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    Feng, Y.-L

    L. Feng, Y.-L. Xu, W. S. Fegadolli, M.-H. Lu, J. E. B. Oliveira, V. R. Almeida, Y.-F. Chen, and A. Scherer, Ex- perimental demonstration of a unidirectional reflection- less parity-time metamaterial at optical frequencies, Nat. Mater.12, 108 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Lawrence, N

    M. Lawrence, N. Xu, X. Zhang, L. Cong, J. Han, W. Zhang, and S. Zhang, Manifestation ofP Tsymme- try breaking in polarization space with terahertz meta- surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 093901 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Peng, S ¸

    B. Peng, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, M. Liertzer, W. Chen, J. Kramer, H. Yılmaz, J. Wiersig, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, Chiral modes and directional lasing at exceptional points, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.113, 6845 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Leykam, K

    D. Leykam, K. Y. Bliokh, C. Huang, Y. D. Chong, and F. Nori, Edge modes, degeneracies, and topological num- bers in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 040401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Z. Gao, B. J. Thompson, H. Dave, S. T. M. Fryslie, and K. D. Choquette, Non-Hermiticity and exceptional points in coherently coupled vertical cavity laser diode arrays, Appl. Phys. Lett.114, 061103 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    C. Wang, X. Jiang, G. Zhao, M. Zhang, C. W. Hsu, B. Peng, A. D. Stone, L. Jiang, and L. Yang, Electro- magnetically induced transparency at a chiral exceptional point, Nat. Phys.16, 334 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    W. Tang, X. Jiang, K. Ding, Y.-X. Xiao, Z.-Q. Zhang, C. T. Chan, and G. Ma, Exceptional nexus with a hybrid topological invariant, Science370, 1077 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    del Pino, J

    J. del Pino, J. J. Slim, and E. Verhagen, Non- Hermitian chiral phononics through optomechanically in- duced squeezing, Nature606, 82 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Y. S. S. Patil, J. H¨ oller, P. A. Henry, C. Guria, Y. Zhang, L. Jiang, N. Kralj, N. Read, and J. G. E. Harris, Mea- suring the knot of non-Hermitian degeneracies and non- commuting braids, Nature607, 271 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    L. Feng, Z. J. Wong, R.-M. Ma, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking, Sci- ence346, 972 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Hodaei, M.-A

    H. Hodaei, M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Parity-time- symmetric microring lasers, Science346, 975 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Brandstetter, M

    M. Brandstetter, M. Liertzer, C. Deutsch, P. Klang, J. Sch¨ oberl, H. E. T¨ ureci, G. Strasser, K. Unterrainer, and S. Rotter, Reversing the pump dependence of a laser at an exceptional point, Nat. Commun.5, 4034 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    P. Miao, Z. Zhang, J. Sun, W. Walasik, S. Longhi, N. M. Litchinitser, and L. Feng, Orbital angular momentum mi- crolaser, Science353, 464 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    K. Liao, Y. Zhong, Z. Du, G. Liu, C. Li, X. Wu, C. Deng, C. Lu, X. Wang, C. T. Chan, Q. Song, S. Wang, X. Liu, X. Hu, and Q. Gong, On-chip integrated exceptional sur- face microlaser, Sci. Adv.9, eadf3470 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Yoo, H.-S

    G. Yoo, H.-S. Sim, and H. Schomerus, Quantum noise and mode nonorthogonality in non-HermitianPT- symmetric optical resonators, Phys. Rev. A84, 063833 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    K. G. Makris, Z. H. Musslimani, D. N. Christodoulides, and S. Rotter, Constant-intensity waves and their modu- lation instability in non-Hermitian potentials, Nat. Com- mun.6, 7257 (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Z. Lin, A. Pick, M. Lonˇ car, and A. W. Rodriguez, En- hanced spontaneous emission at third-order Dirac excep- tional points in inverse-designed photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 107402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    A. Pick, B. Zhen, O. D. Miller, C. W. Hsu, F. Hernandez, A. W. Rodriguez, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, and S. G. Johnson, General theory of spontaneous emission near exceptional points, Opt. Express25, 12325 (2017). 14

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Takata, K

    K. Takata, K. Nozaki, E. Kuramochi, S. Matsuo, K. Takeda, T. Fujii, S. Kita, A. Shinya, and M. Notomi, Observing exceptional point degeneracy of radiation with electrically pumped photonic crystal coupled-nanocavity lasers, Optica8, 184 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Yulaev, S

    A. Yulaev, S. Kim, Q. Li, D. A. Westly, B. J. Roxworthy, K. Srinivasan, and V. A. Aksyuk, Exceptional points in lossy media lead to deep polynomial wave penetration with spatially uniform power loss, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 583 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Ap- plication to microcavity sensors for single-particle detec- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 203901 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature548, 187 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Chen, S ¸

    W. Chen, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature548, 192 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    J.-H. Park, A. Ndao, W. Cai, L. Hsu, A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, Y.-H. Lo, and B. Kant´ e, Symmetry-breaking- induced plasmonic exceptional points and nanoscale sens- ing, Nat. Phys.16, 462 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Kononchuk, J

    R. Kononchuk, J. Cai, F. Ellis, R. Thevamaran, and T. Kottos, Exceptional-point-based accelerometers with enhanced signal-to-noise ratio, Nature607, 697 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Doppler, A

    J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. B¨ ohm, U. Kuhl, A. Girschik, F. Libisch, T. J. Milburn, P. Rabl, N. Moi- seyev, and S. Rotter, Dynamically encircling an excep- tional point for asymmetric mode switching, Nature537, 76 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Schumer, Y

    A. Schumer, Y. G. N. Liu, J. Leshin, L. Ding, Y. Alah- madi, A. U. Hassan, H. Nasari, S. Rotter, D. N. Christodoulides, P. LiKamWa, and M. Khajavikhan, Topological modes in a laser cavity through exceptional state transfer, Science375, 884 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    E. M. Graefe, U. G¨ unther, H. J. Korsch, and A. E. Niederle, A non-Hermitian symmetric Bose-Hubbard model: eigenvalue rings from unfolding higher-order ex- ceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 255206 (2008)

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    W. D. Heiss, Chirality of wavefunctions for three coalesc- ing levels, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 244010 (2008)

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    M. Y. Nada, M. A. K. Othman, and F. Capolino, Theory of coupled resonator optical waveguides exhibiting high- order exceptional points of degeneracy, Phys. Rev. B96, 184304 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Xiao, Z.-Q

    Y.-X. Xiao, Z.-Q. Zhang, Z. H. Hang, and C. T. Chan, Anisotropic exceptional points of arbitrary order, Phys. Rev. B99, 241403 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Z. Xiao, H. Li, T. Kottos, and A. Al` u, Enhanced sens- ing and nondegraded thermal noise performance based on PT-symmetric electronic circuits with a sixth-order ex- ceptional point, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 213901 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Zhong, J

    Q. Zhong, J. Kou, S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, and R. El-Ganainy, Hi- erarchical construction of higher-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 203602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    H. Yang, X. Mao, G.-Q. Qin, M. Wang, H. Zhang, D. Ruan, and G.-L. Long, Scalable higher-order excep- tional surface with passive resonators, Opt. Lett.46, 4025 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Mandal and E

    I. Mandal and E. J. Bergholtz, Symmetry and higher- order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 186601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Delplace, T

    P. Delplace, T. Yoshida, and Y. Hatsugai, Symmetry- protected multifold exceptional points and their topologi- cal characterization, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 186602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Sayyad and F

    S. Sayyad and F. K. Kunst, Realizing exceptional points of any order in the presence of symmetry, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023130 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Kaltsas, I

    D. Kaltsas, I. Komis, and K. G. Makris, Higher order exceptional points in infinite lattices, Opt. Lett.47, 4447 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Kullig, D

    J. Kullig, D. Grom, S. Klembt, and J. Wiersig, Higher- order exceptional points in waveguide-coupled microcavi- ties: perturbation induced frequency splitting and mode patterns, Photon. Res.11, A54 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [54]

    D. D. Smith, H. Chang, K. A. Fuller, A. T. Rosen- berger, and R. W. Boyd, Coupled-resonator-induced transparency, Phys. Rev. A69, 063804 (2004)

    work page 2004

  54. [55]

    Waks and J

    E. Waks and J. Vuckovic, Dipole induced transparency in drop-filter cavity-waveguide systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 153601 (2006)

    work page 2006

  55. [56]

    Wiersig, Petermann factors and phase rigidities near exceptional points, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Petermann factors and phase rigidities near exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033042 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [57]

    Schomerus, Eigenvalue sensitivity from eigenstate geometry near and beyond arbitrary-order exceptional points, Phys

    H. Schomerus, Eigenvalue sensitivity from eigenstate geometry near and beyond arbitrary-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013044 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [58]

    W. Suh, Z. Wang, and S. Fan, Temporal coupled-mode theory and the presence of non-orthogonal modes in loss- less multimode cavities, IEEE J. Quantum Electron.40, 1511 (2004)

    work page 2004

  58. [59]

    Takata, N

    K. Takata, N. Roberts, A. Shinya, and M. Notomi, Imag- inary couplings in non-Hermitian coupled-mode theory: Effects on exceptional points of optical resonators, Phys. Rev. A105, 013523 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [60]

    Akahane, T

    Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda, High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crys- tal, Nature425, 944 (2003)

    work page 2003

  60. [61]

    Matsuo, A

    S. Matsuo, A. Shinya, T. Kakitsuka, K. Nozaki, T. Segawa, T. Sato, Y. Kawaguchi, and M. Notomi, High-speed ultracompact buried heterostructure photonic- crystal laser with 13 fJ of energy consumed per bit trans- mitted, Nat. Photon.4, 648 (2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [62]

    Takata and M

    K. Takata and M. Notomi,PT-symmetric coupled- resonator waveguide based on buried heterostructure nanocavities, Phys. Rev. Applied7, 054023 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [63]

    D. K. Cheng,Field and Wave Electromagnetics, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, 1989)

    work page 1989

  63. [64]

    Yariv, Y

    A. Yariv, Y. Xu, R. K. Lee, and A. Scherer, Coupled- resonator optical waveguide: a proposal and analysis, Opt. Lett.24, 711 (1999)

    work page 1999

  64. [65]

    Schomerus, Fundamental constraints on the observ- ability of non-Hermitian effects in passive systems, Phys

    H. Schomerus, Fundamental constraints on the observ- ability of non-Hermitian effects in passive systems, Phys. Rev. A106, 063509 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [66]

    Wiersig, Response strengths of open systems at excep- tional points, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Response strengths of open systems at excep- tional points, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023121 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [67]

    H.-Z. Chen, T. Liu, H.-Y. Luan, R.-J. Liu, X.-Y. Wang, X.-F. Zhu, Y.-B. Li, Z.-M. Gu, S.-J. Liang, H. Gao, L. Lu, L. Ge, S. Zhang, J. Zhu, and R.-M. Ma, Revealing the missing dimension at an exceptional point, Nat. Phys.16, 571 (2020)

    work page 2020

  67. [68]

    Hashemi, K

    A. Hashemi, K. Busch, D. N. Christodoulides, S. K. 15 Ozdemir, and R. El-Ganainy, Linear response theory of open systems with exceptional points, Nat. Commun.13, 3281 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [69]

    Bai, T.-R

    K. Bai, T.-R. Liu, L. Fang, J.-Z. Li, C. Lin, D. Wan, and M. Xiao, Observation of nonlinear exceptional points with a complete basis in dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 073802 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [70]

    Imamura, S

    R. Imamura, S. Fujii, A. Nakashima, and T. Tanabe, Ex- ceptional point proximity-driven mode-locking in coupled microresonators, Opt. Express32, 22280 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [71]

    Deng and M

    H. Deng and M. Khajavikhan, Parity–time symmetric optical neural networks, Optica8, 1328 (2021). Acknowledgments We thank Shota Kita and Hisashi Sumikura for fruitful discussion.Funding:This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI under Grant Number JP20H05641.Author contributions:K.T. conceived the idea, developed the theoretical framework, performed the anal...

    work page 2021

  71. [72]

    Miyake,Linear Algebra: From the beginnings to the Jordan normal forms(Springer Singapore, 2022)

    T. Miyake,Linear Algebra: From the beginnings to the Jordan normal forms(Springer Singapore, 2022)

    work page 2022

  72. [73]

    Bossart and R

    A. Bossart and R. Fleury, Non-Hermitian time evolution: From static to parametric instability, Phys. Rev. A104, 042225 (2021)

    work page 2021

  73. [74]

    A. Pick, B. Zhen, O. D. Miller, C. W. Hsu, F. Hernandez, A. W. Rodriguez, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, and S. G. Johnson, General theory of spontaneous emission near exceptional points, Opt. Express25, 12325 (2017). 23 1 5 10 14 1 5 10 14 1 5 10 14 1 5 10 14 Column Row 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Row 0 1 2 3 4 ...

    work page 2017