pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.01738 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Hopf symmetry protected topological phases in the vicinity of spin orders

Grgur Palle This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 11:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords Hopf termsymmetry protected topological phasesspin ordersspin-Hall conductanceSU(2) symmetrytwo-dimensional metalstopological theta terms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hopf terms emerge in two-dimensional metals near spin orders when magnetic and loop-current orders fluctuate, realizing symmetry-protected topological phases with quantized spin-Hall conductance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that Hopf terms, topological theta terms linked to anyons and the spin quantum Hall effect, can arise in two-dimensional metals without spin-orbit coupling. Near spin-ordered phases, order parameters maintain finite amplitude but fluctuate in orientation. When both magnetic and spin loop-current orders fluctuate together, the system enters a Hopf symmetry protected topological phase. This phase stays gapped in the bulk, supports chiral gapless edge states, and shows quantized spin-Hall conductance while remaining protected by unbroken SU(2) spin rotation symmetry. The work also proves that the theta angle must be quantized to multiples of pi in non-relativistic systems, ruling out anyonic skyrmions.

Core claim

When both a magnetic and a spin loop-current order parameter fluctuate in the system, the phase is governed by the Hopf term and realizes a Hopf symmetry protected topological phase. This phase is protected by the unbroken SU(2) spin rotation symmetry, is gapped in the bulk, has chiral gapless edge states, and its spin-Hall conductance is quantized. The paper also provides an elementary proof that the theta angle of the Hopf term must be quantized to multiples of pi in non-relativistic systems, thereby precluding anyonic skyrmions in condensed matter systems.

What carries the argument

The Hopf term, a topological theta term generated when both magnetic and spin loop-current order parameters fluctuate simultaneously near spin orders.

Load-bearing premise

Spin-like order parameters have finite amplitude but fluctuating orientation, and both magnetic and spin loop-current orders are simultaneously present and fluctuating.

What would settle it

Measurement of quantized spin-Hall conductance or detection of chiral gapless edge states in a lattice model with coexisting fluctuating magnetic and spin loop-current orders but no spin-orbit coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.01738 by Grgur Palle.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic temperature T vs. tuning parameter p phase diagram of a crossing between a magnetic and spin loop-current insulator in 2+1D. Due to Hohenberg-Mermin￾Wagner’s theorem [18, 19], the magnetic (dark red) and spin loop-current (dark blue) phases, which break the SO(3) spin rotation symmetry, only set in at T = 0. At finite T, the cor￾responding order parameters nˆ and nˆ ′ , respectively, fluctuate, a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An example of a field configuration nˆ(x) that has a unit Hopf number QHopf = +1. Everywhere outside of the lightly blue-shaded torus, nˆ(x) points along +eˆ3 to within an angle of π/3. Within the torus, the thick lines denote regions where nˆ(x) is oriented along the directions indicated by the legend. One way of interpreting this field configuration is as the creation of a skyrmion–anti-skyrmion pair tha… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Partition of compactified spacetime S 1 τ × S2 r into V1 = V ′ 1 −∆ (red region) and V2 = V ′ 2 +∆ (blue and purple re￾gions). Since spacetime is periodic in imaginary time τ ≡ x 0 , which corresponds to height in the figure, the drawn cylinders represent toruses. Here ∆ is the volume change under the de￾formation Vn → V ′ n. A12 = ∂V1 = −∂V2, A ′ 12 = ∂V ′ 1 = −∂V ′ 2 , and Σ are 2D surfaces, whereas L12,… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A square lattice with Q = (π, π) antiferromagnetic ordering. The t arrows indicate the hoppings of the kinetic part of the Hamiltonian. The g (g ′ ) arrows indicate the mo￾mentum dependence of the coupling to nˆ (nˆ ′ ). After ordering, the induced hoppings related to g and g ′ acquire additional signs that depend on the colors of the sites. but at the expense of breaking the 90◦ rotation symme￾try. The Ch… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Hopf terms are topological theta terms that are associated with a host of interesting physics, including anyons, statistical transmutation, chiral edge states, and the spin quantum Hall effect. Here, we show that Hopf terms can appear in two-dimensional metals without spin-orbit coupling in the vicinity of spin-ordered phases. In their vicinity, their spin-like order parameters have a finite amplitude, but fluctuating orientation. When both a magnetic and a spin loop-current order parameter fluctuate in the system, we show that the phase is governed by the Hopf term and realizes a Hopf symmetry protected topological phase. This phase is protected by the unbroken $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ spin rotation symmetry, is gapped in the bulk, has chiral gapless edge states, and its spin-Hall conductance is quantized. Lattice models that realize this phase are introduced. In addition, we provide an elementary proof that the $\theta$ angle of the Hopf term must be quantized to multiples of $\pi$ in non-relativistic systems, thereby precluding anyonic skyrmions in condensed matter systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that Hopf terms appear in two-dimensional metals without spin-orbit coupling near spin-ordered phases, where spin-like order parameters have finite amplitude but fluctuating orientation. When both a magnetic order parameter and a spin loop-current order parameter fluctuate simultaneously, the low-energy theory is governed by the Hopf term, realizing a Hopf symmetry-protected topological phase protected by unbroken SU(2) spin rotation symmetry. This phase is gapped in the bulk, supports chiral gapless edge states, and exhibits quantized spin-Hall conductance. Concrete lattice models are introduced to realize the phase, and an elementary proof is provided that the Hopf term's θ angle must be quantized to integer multiples of π in non-relativistic systems, precluding anyonic skyrmions.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the result would identify a mechanism for realizing Hopf SPT phases and quantized transport in non-relativistic 2D systems near conventional spin orders without requiring spin-orbit coupling. The quantization proof would strengthen constraints on possible statistics in condensed-matter settings, and the lattice models would offer testable platforms for numerical or experimental exploration of these phases.

major comments (2)
  1. [Effective action derivation (near abstract and model sections)] The central claim that coexistence of fluctuating magnetic and spin loop-current orders generates a dominant Hopf term with θ = nπ relies on integrating out fermions or performing a gradient expansion; the manuscript must supply the explicit leading-order cross term in the effective action (likely in the section deriving the low-energy theory from the lattice models) to confirm the Hopf invariant appears and dominates without additional tuning.
  2. [Quantization proof section] The elementary proof that θ is quantized to multiples of π in non-relativistic systems is stated in the abstract but requires the full steps to be shown; it must be verified that the proof does not implicitly assume the very form of the Hopf term it seeks to constrain and that it applies directly to the lattice models with finite-amplitude but fluctuating orders.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Lattice models section] Notation for the order parameters and the precise definition of the spin loop-current operator should be clarified with explicit expressions to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas where additional detail will strengthen the presentation. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and explicit derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Effective action derivation (near abstract and model sections)] The central claim that coexistence of fluctuating magnetic and spin loop-current orders generates a dominant Hopf term with θ = nπ relies on integrating out fermions or performing a gradient expansion; the manuscript must supply the explicit leading-order cross term in the effective action (likely in the section deriving the low-energy theory from the lattice models) to confirm the Hopf invariant appears and dominates without additional tuning.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the leading-order cross term is essential to rigorously establish the dominance of the Hopf term. In the revised manuscript we will add the full calculation of the effective action obtained by integrating out the fermions from the lattice models. This will explicitly display the cross term between the magnetic and spin loop-current order parameters that generates the Hopf invariant at leading order in the gradient expansion, confirming that it appears without additional tuning. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Quantization proof section] The elementary proof that θ is quantized to multiples of π in non-relativistic systems is stated in the abstract but requires the full steps to be shown; it must be verified that the proof does not implicitly assume the very form of the Hopf term it seeks to constrain and that it applies directly to the lattice models with finite-amplitude but fluctuating orders.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. While the proof is already present in the manuscript, we acknowledge that the intermediate steps can be expanded for greater clarity. In the revision we will present the complete derivation, beginning from the general structure of the non-relativistic effective action and the topological constraints imposed by SU(2) invariance, without presupposing the Hopf term itself. We will also add a paragraph explicitly connecting the proof to the lattice models, showing that the finite-amplitude but fluctuating order parameters satisfy the assumptions used in the quantization argument. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation builds effective Hopf term from explicit lattice models and assumptions

full rationale

The paper constructs lattice models with coexisting finite-amplitude but orientation-fluctuating magnetic and spin loop-current orders, then derives the governing Hopf term and SPT properties from integrating out fermions under unbroken SU(2). The quantization of θ to integer multiples of π is presented via an elementary proof specific to non-relativistic systems. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the input assumptions, no self-citations are invoked for uniqueness or ansatz, and the central claims remain independent of the fitted or renamed inputs. The result follows from the stated model definitions and gradient expansion without tautological equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Limited information available from abstract only; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are described. The work relies on standard assumptions of effective field theory near ordered phases.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Unbroken SU(2) spin rotation symmetry protects the phase
    Stated directly as the protecting symmetry for the topological phase.
  • domain assumption Effective description by Hopf term when both order parameters fluctuate
    Central to realizing the SPT phase in the vicinity of spin orders.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5706 in / 1431 out tokens · 64089 ms · 2026-05-18T11:06:31.265066+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Theˆn0 andˆn′ 0 surface integrals in Eq

    For sufficiently smooth and regular field configurationsˆn(x), Link[γℓ(ˆn0), γℓ′(ˆn′ 0)]is singular only at isolated points, i.e., on a set of measure zero. Theˆn0 andˆn′ 0 surface integrals in Eq. (A5) may thus be eliminated. The result is Eq. (4), subject to the condition thatˆn0 andˆn′ 0 ̸=ˆn0 are regular. Appendix B: Properties of theSU(2)andCP 1 para...

    work page

  2. [2]

    F.WilczekandA.Zee,Linkingnumbers, spin, andstatis- tics of solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 2250 (1983)

    work page 1983

  3. [3]

    Wu and A

    Y.-S. Wu and A. Zee, Comments on the Hopf lagrangian and fractional statistics of solitons, Phys. Lett. B147, 325 (1984)

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    J. M. Leinaas and J. Myrheim, On the theory of identical particles, Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996)37, 1 (1977)

    work page 1971

  5. [5]

    G. A. Goldin, R. Menikoff, and D. H. Sharp, Particle statistics from induced representations of a local current group, J. Math. Phys.21, 650 (1980)

    work page 1980

  6. [6]

    G. A. Goldin, R. Menikoff, and D. H. Sharp, Represen- tations of a local current algebra in nonsimply connected space and the Aharonov–Bohm effect, J. Math. Phys.22, 1664 (1981)

    work page 1981

  7. [7]

    Wilczek, Magnetic flux, angular momentum, and statistics, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Magnetic flux, angular momentum, and statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1144 (1982)

    work page 1982

  8. [8]

    Wilczek, Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin parti- cles, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin parti- cles, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 957 (1982)

    work page 1982

  9. [9]

    A. P. Polychronakos, Topological mass quantization and parity violation in 2+1 dimensional QED, Nucl. Phys. B 281, 241 (1987)

    work page 1987

  10. [10]

    I. J. R. Aitchison and N. E. Mavromatos, Quantization of the Hopf coefficient in effective gauge theories of doped Mott insulators, Mod. Phys. Lett. A04, 521 (1989). 14

    work page 1989

  11. [11]

    Wen, A note on spin of Skyrmions in the (2+1)-D O(3) non–linearσmodel, Commun

    J. Wen, A note on spin of Skyrmions in the (2+1)-D O(3) non–linearσmodel, Commun. Theor. Phys.16, 111 (1991)

    work page 1991

  12. [12]

    J. A. de Azcárraga, J. M. Izquierdo, and W. J. Za- krzewski, Models with Hopf terms, J. Math. Phys.33, 1272 (1992)

    work page 1992

  13. [13]

    J. C. Baez, M. S. Ody, and W. Richter, Topological as- pects of spin and statistics in nonlinear sigma models, J. Math. Phys.36, 247 (1995)

    work page 1995

  14. [14]

    Bralić, C

    N. Bralić, C. Fosco, and F. Schaposnik, On the quanti- zation of the Abelian Chern-Simons coefficient at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B383, 199 (1996)

    work page 1996

  15. [15]

    Liu and X.-G

    Z.-X. Liu and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry-protected quantum spin Hall phases in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 067205 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topo- logical order, Phys. Rev. B80, 155131 (2009)

    work page 2009

  17. [17]

    Senthil, Symmetry-protected topological phases of quantum matter, Annu

    T. Senthil, Symmetry-protected topological phases of quantum matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 299 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Xu and A

    C. Xu and A. W. W. Ludwig, Nonperturbative effects of a topological theta term on principal chiral nonlinear sigma models in2 + 1dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 200405 (2013)

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    P. C. Hohenberg, Existence of long-range order in one and two dimensions, Phys. Rev.158, 383 (1967)

    work page 1967

  20. [20]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of ferromag- netism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1133 (1966)

    work page 1966

  21. [21]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Nonlinear field theory of large-spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets: Semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy-axis Néel state, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1153 (1983)

    work page 1983

  22. [22]

    Haldane, Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnet: Identification with the O(3) nonlinear sigma model, Phys

    F. Haldane, Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnet: Identification with the O(3) nonlinear sigma model, Phys. Lett. A93, 464 (1983)

    work page 1983

  23. [23]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Ground state properties of antifer- romagnetic chains with unrestricted spin: Integer spin chains as realisations of the O(3) non-linear sigma model, arXiv:1612.00076[cond-mat.other](2016)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Affleck, Quantum spin chains and the Haldane gap, J

    I. Affleck, Quantum spin chains and the Haldane gap, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter1, 3047 (1989)

    work page 1989

  25. [25]

    Dzyaloshinskii, A

    I. Dzyaloshinskii, A. Polyakov, and P. Wiegmann, Neu- tral fermions in paramagnetic insulators, Phys. Lett. A 127, 112 (1988)

    work page 1988

  26. [26]

    X. G. Wen and A. Zee, Spin waves and topological terms in the mean-field theory of two-dimensional ferromagnets and antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1025 (1988)

    work page 1988

  27. [27]

    Dombre and N

    T. Dombre and N. Read, Absence of the Hopf invariant in the long-wavelength action of two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B38, 7181 (1988)

    work page 1988

  28. [28]

    Fradkin and M

    E. Fradkin and M. Stone, Topological terms in one- and two-dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B38, 7215 (1988)

    work page 1988

  29. [29]

    F. D. M. Haldane, O(3) nonlinearσmodel and the topo- logical distinction between integer- and half-integer-spin antiferromagnets in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1029 (1988)

    work page 1988

  30. [30]

    L. B. Ioffe and A. I. Larkin, Effective action of a two- dimensional antiferromagnet, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B02, 203 (1988)

    work page 1988

  31. [31]

    Dombre and N

    T. Dombre and N. Read, Nonlinearσmodels for trian- gular quantum antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B39, 6797 (1989)

    work page 1989

  32. [32]

    J. C. Baez, A. R. Bishop, and R. Dandoloff, On the Hopf term in a two-dimensionalσmodel for antiferromagnets, Mod. Phys. Lett. B05, 2003 (1991)

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    Balakrishnan, A

    R. Balakrishnan, A. R. Bishop, and R. Dandoloff, Gauge freedom, anholonomy, and Hopf index of a three- dimensional unit vector field, Phys. Rev. B47, 5438 (1993)

    work page 1993

  34. [34]

    Villain-Guillot and R

    S. Villain-Guillot and R. Dandoloff, On the angular mo- mentum density of a two-dimensional quantum Heisen- berg antiferromagnet, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.31, 5401 (1998)

    work page 1998

  35. [35]

    G. E. Volovik and V. M. Yakovenko, Fractional charge, spin and statistics of solitons in superfluid3He film, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter1, 5263 (1989)

    work page 1989

  36. [36]

    K. Moon, H. Mori, K. Yang, S. M. Girvin, A. H. Mac- Donald, L. Zheng, D. Yoshioka, and S.-C. Zhang, Sponta- neous interlayer coherence in double-layer quantum Hall systems: Charged vortices and Kosterlitz-Thouless phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B51, 5138 (1995)

    work page 1995

  37. [37]

    S. V. Iordanskii, Hopf term in the action for vor- tices/skyrmions with odd filling of Landau levels, JETP Letters66, 188 (1997)

    work page 1997

  38. [38]

    Apel and Y

    W. Apel and Y. A. Bychkov, Hopf term and the effec- tive Lagrangian for the Skyrmions in a two-dimensional electron gas at smallgfactor, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2188 (1997)

    work page 1997

  39. [39]

    R.Ray,QuantumHallferromagnets: Inducedtopological term and electromagnetic interactions, Phys. Rev. B60, 14154 (1999)

    work page 1999

  40. [40]

    Sengupta and V

    K. Sengupta and V. M. Yakovenko, Hopf invariant for long-wavelength skyrmions in quantum Hall systems for integer and fractional fillings, Phys. Rev. B62, 4586 (2000)

    work page 2000

  41. [41]

    V. M. Yakovenko, Chern-Simons terms andnfield in Hal- dane’s model for the quantum Hall effect without Landau levels, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 251 (1990)

    work page 1990

  42. [42]

    V. M. Yakovenko, Quantum Hall effect in quasi-one- dimensional conductors, Phys. Rev. B43, 11353 (1991)

    work page 1991

  43. [43]

    Hlousek, D

    Z. Hlousek, D. Sénéchal, and S.-H. H. Tye, Induced Hopf term in the nonlinearσmodel, Phys. Rev. D41, 3773 (1990)

    work page 1990

  44. [44]

    A. G. Abanov, Hopf term induced by fermions, Phys. Lett. B492, 321 (2000)

    work page 2000

  45. [45]

    A. G. Abanov and P. B. Wiegmann, On the correspon- dence between fermionic number and statistics of soli- tons, J. High Energy Phys.2001(10), 030

    work page 2001

  46. [46]

    Abanov and P

    A. Abanov and P. Wiegmann, Theta-terms in nonlinear sigma-models, Nucl. Phys. B570, 685 (2000)

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    A. G. Abanov and P. B. Wiegmann, Chiral nonlinear σmodels as models for topological superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1319 (2001)

    work page 2001

  48. [48]

    Y. Ran, P. Hosur, and A. Vishwanath, Fermionic Hopf solitons and Berry phase in topological surface supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B84, 184501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    Grover and T

    T. Grover and T. Senthil, Topological spin Hall states, charged Skyrmions, and superconductivity in two dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 156804 (2008)

    work page 2008

  50. [50]

    Yue and Z.-X

    Y.-G. Yue and Z.-X. Liu, Realization of the topological Hopf term in two-dimensional lattice models, Phys. Rev. B107, 045130 (2023). 15

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Y.-G. Yue, S. Yang, Z.-X. Liu, and Y. Chen, Universal rule for topological Hopf term via Dirac-spin coupling, arXiv:2503.13239[cond-mat.str-el](2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. D. Simons,Condensed Matter Field Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    Hopf, Über die Abbildungen der dreidimensionalen SphäreaufdieKugelfläche,MathematischeAnnalen104, 637 (1931)

    H. Hopf, Über die Abbildungen der dreidimensionalen SphäreaufdieKugelfläche,MathematischeAnnalen104, 637 (1931)

    work page 1931

  54. [54]

    G. L. Naber,Topology, Geometry and Gauge fields: In- teractions(Springer New York, NY, 2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nat. Rev. Mater.2, 17031 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Chern and J

    S.-S. Chern and J. Simons, Characteristic forms and ge- ometric invariants, Ann. Math.99, 48 (1974)

    work page 1974

  57. [57]

    Baez and J

    J. Baez and J. P. Muniain,Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity(World Scientific, 1994)

    work page 1994

  58. [58]

    Alvarez, Topological quantization and cohomology, Commun

    O. Alvarez, Topological quantization and cohomology, Commun. Math. Phys.100, 279 (1985)

    work page 1985

  59. [59]

    C. F. Valenti and M. Lax, Classical theory of a rigid magnetic continuum, Phys. Rev. B16, 4936 (1977)

    work page 1977

  60. [60]

    Jevicki and N

    A. Jevicki and N. Papanicolaou, Semi-classical spectrum of the continuous Heisenberg spin chain, Ann. Phys.120, 107 (1979)

    work page 1979

  61. [61]

    J. R. Klauder, Path integrals and stationary-phase ap- proximations, Phys. Rev. D19, 2349 (1979)

    work page 1979

  62. [62]

    Abanov, Topology, geometry and quantum interfer- ence in condensed matter physics, inTopology and Con- densed Matter Physics, edited by S

    A. Abanov, Topology, geometry and quantum interfer- ence in condensed matter physics, inTopology and Con- densed Matter Physics, edited by S. M. Bhattacharjee, M. Mj, and A. Bandyopadhyay (Springer Singapore, Sin- gapore, 2017) pp. 281–331

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- metries, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    work page 2010

  65. [65]

    Witten, Non-abelian bosonization in two dimensions, Commun

    E. Witten, Non-abelian bosonization in two dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys.92, 455 (1984)

    work page 1984

  66. [66]

    Knizhnik and A

    V. Knizhnik and A. Zamolodchikov, Current algebra and Wess-Zumino model in two dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 247, 83 (1984)

    work page 1984

  67. [67]

    P. M. Philippe Francesco and D. Sénéchal,Conformal Field Theory(Springer New York, NY, 1997)

    work page 1997

  68. [68]

    Gibertini, M

    M. Gibertini, M. Koperski, A. F. Morpurgo, and K. S. Novoselov, Magnetic 2D materials and heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol.14, 408 (2019)

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    Tokura, K

    Y. Tokura, K. Yasuda, and A. Tsukazaki, Magnetic topo- logical insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 126 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    G. V. Dunne, Aspects of Chern-Simons theory, inAs- pects topologiques de la physique en basse dimension. Topological aspects of low dimensional systems, edited by A. Comtet, T. Jolicœur, S. Ouvry, and F. David (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999) pp. 177–263

    work page 1999

  71. [71]

    Salcedo, The induced Chern–Simons term at finite temperature, Phys

    L. Salcedo, The induced Chern–Simons term at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B530, 244 (2002)

    work page 2002

  72. [72]

    Deser, L

    S. Deser, L. Griguolo, and D. Seminara, Gauge invari- ance, finite temperature, and parity anomaly inD= 3, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1976 (1997)

    work page 1976

  73. [73]

    C.D.Fosco, G.L.Rossini,andF.A.Schaposnik,Induced parity-breaking term at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1980 (1997); Erratum: Induced parity-breaking term at finite temperature [Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1980 (1997)], Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 4296 (1997)

    work page 1980