Pith. sign in

REVIEW 47 references

Conformal dimension bounds, Pontryagin sphere boundaries, and algebraic fibering of right-angled Coxeter groups

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Branching graphs split Coxeter groups into infinitely many types

arxiv 2510.03430 v2 pith:ULTJMJUO submitted 2025-10-03 math.GR

Christopher H. Cashen , Pallavi Dani , Kevin Schreve , Emily Stark This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.GR MSC 20F6520F5557M0730L1051E24
keywords right-angledCoxetergroupshyperbolicconformaldimensionquasi-isometryclassificationPontryaginspherealgebraicfiberingvirtualcohomologicalroundtrees
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a local graph-theoretic condition, (n,m)-branching, that controls how the Gromov boundary of a hyperbolic right-angled Coxeter group behaves: any graph with this condition defines a group whose boundary has conformal dimension at least 1 + log n / log(3m−7). The proof works by embedding a combinatorial round tree into the group's cube complex with vertical branching n and horizontal branching at most 3m−7, then applying known bounds that turn round-tree parameters into conformal dimension estimates. From this, the authors obtain two families of results: hyperbolic right-angled Coxeter groups with Pontryagin sphere boundary whose conformal dimensions tend to infinity, which means infinitely many quasi-isometry classes; and, for every dimension n ≥ 2, infinitely many quasi-isometry classes of virtually algebraically fibered hyperbolic right-angled Coxeter groups of virtual cohomological dimension n. The significance is that conformal dimension—a quasisymmetry invariant of the boundary—is used to separate quasi-isometry classes within families that were previously not known to contain infinitely many.

What carries the argument

The key object is the combinatorial round tree, a 2-complex built from a nested sequence of disks that branch n-fold in the vertical direction while each disk meets at most H new disks in the next level; here H = 3m−7. The (n,m)-branching condition on the defining graph supplies, at every vertex of the outer edge path of the current disk, n distinct cycles of squares of length at most m that share exactly the current segment and whose union is an induced subgraph of the defining graph. This is precisely what makes the growing subcomplex locally convex in the cube complex, so it is a quasiconvex round tree. The count 3m−7 is the worst-case number of new squares that a single square can meet w

What would settle it

A concrete test: for a small (n,m)-branching graph such as the Heawood graph, explicitly construct the first two stages of the round tree described in the paper and verify that each link of the new subcomplex is an induced subgraph of the defining graph. If any link contains an induced 4-cycle or an unwanted edge that breaks convexity, the lower bound would fail for that graph. Likewise, a computer search over finite graphs of girth 5 could look for one that cannot be embedded as an induced subgraph of any flag-no-square triangulation of a closed orientable surface; the existence of such a gra

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the (n,m)-branching condition, which requires every vertex to have degree at least n+1 and every induced edge or two-edge segment to be extendable to n cycles of length between 5 and m whose pairwise intersection is exactly the segment and whose union is induced, forces the conformal dimension of the boundary of the hyperbolic right-angled Coxeter group WΓ to be at least 1 + log n / log(3m−7). The proof constructs a combinatorial round tree as a convex subcomplex of the cube complex associated to WΓ, with vertical branching n and horizontal branching at most 3m−7; the branching condition is exactly what is needed to keep the subcomplex locally convex while new squar

Load-bearing premise

The proof depends on the unproved claim that any girth-at-least-5 graph embeds as an induced subgraph of a flag-no-square triangulation of a closed orientable surface, together with the local convexity checks in the round-tree construction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For m fixed and n growing, the sequence of (n,m)-branching graphs yields hyperbolic right-angled Coxeter groups whose boundary conformal dimension grows without bound, hence infinitely many quasi-isometry classes.
  • Embedding these graphs as induced subgraphs of flag-no-square surface triangulations gives infinitely many quasi-isometry classes of hyperbolic right-angled Coxeter groups with Pontryagin sphere boundary.
  • For every virtual cohomological dimension n ≥ 2, there are infinitely many quasi-isometry classes of virtually algebraically fibered hyperbolic right-angled Coxeter groups.
  • The (n,m)-branching condition also forces geometric consequences: such graphs have girth at least 5, are inseparable for n ≥ 2, and are nonplanar for n ≥ 3, so the boundary of the group is a planar Sierpinski carpet or a Menger curve depending on the degree of branching and planarity.
  • For each fixed n, the lower bound 1 + log n / log(3m−7) weakens as m grows, so the families with the strongest control (smallest m, such as the hexagon-based examples with m = 6) give the best bounds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The horizontal branching count 3m−7 comes from a worst-case analysis of how a square meets the outer edge path; a sharper count for specific families—for instance, when all cycles are hexagons—might lower H and thus raise the conformal dimension lower bound for the same graphs.
  • The surface-embedding lemma is only sketched in the paper: the proof shows how to get the graph as a subcomplex of a triangulation but does not explicitly justify that the triangulation can be made flag-no-square while preserving the graph as an induced subcomplex. If that gap cannot be filled, the Pontryagin-sphere family would still be plausible but would need a different construction.
  • The fibering upgrade works by making the group a lattice in a thick building with a prescribed underlying Coxeter group; this suggests a general recipe—any hyperbolic right-angled group family that can be thickened to large multiplicity with fixed virtual cohomological dimension will automatically contain infinitely many quasi-isometry classes of virtually fibered groups.
  • Because the branching condition is purely local and the round tree is quasiconvex, the conformal dimension lower bound applies not only to the whole group but to any supergroup obtained by a quasi-isometric embedding that respects the tree; this could transfer the bounds to other classes of groups containing such Coxeter subgroups.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 4.8 is a substantive graph-to-metric derivation via Mackay's external round-tree theorem, and the later applications use independent external results.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. Theorem 4.8 lower-bounds Confdim(∂WΓ) by 1 + log n / log(3m − 7) whenever Γ satisfies the (n,m)-branching condition of Definition 4.3. The parameters n and m are inputs to the graph-theoretic hypothesis; they are not fitted constants obtained from conformal-dimension data. Construction 4.9 proves that such a Γ admits a combinatorial round tree with vertical branching n and horizontal branching at most 3m − 7, and Theorem 4.8 then applies Mackay's Theorem 4.2, an external result, to the embedded round tree. The count 3m − 7 is derived from the length bound on the cycles H_i in Definition 4.3, not imposed in order to force the displayed lower bound. The applications also use independent external results: LMSSW's thickening construction, Kielak's fibering theorem, Bourdon's building conformal-dimension computations, and Fischer's theorem identifying Pontryagin sphere boundaries. No step of the paper reduces, by its own equations or by self-citation, a predicted quantity to an input or a fitted value. Self-citations to [26] and [44] are contextual rather than load-bearing. The main weakness is not circularity: Lemma 5.3's proof is only sketched and does not explicitly establish the full flag-no-square and induced-subgraph conclusions at that point, so it is a possible completeness/correctness gap, not a circular reduction, since Theorem 5.1's conclusion is not assumed as an input of that argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on standard external theorems (Moussong, Mackay, Haglund-Wise, Kielak, Davis-Dymara-Januszkiewicz-Okun, Bourdon, Fischer, Dirac) and on the new Definition 4.3. No numerical constant is fitted to data, and no new entity is postulated; the only novel 'object' is the graph condition itself, which plays the role of a hypothesis rather than a free parameter.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Moussong's hyperbolicity criterion: WΓ is hyperbolic iff Γ has no induced squares
    Used in Lemma 2.3(1); the branching condition implies girth >= 5 (Lemma 4.4), so WΓ is hyperbolic.
  • standard math Mackay's combinatorial round tree theorem (Theorem 7.2 in [37]): q.i. embedding of a round tree with vertical branching V and horizontal branching H gives Confdim >= 1 + log V/log H
    The engine of Theorem 4.8; the constructed round tree has V=n and H=3m-7.
  • standard math Haglund-Wise local-to-global convexity lemma (Lemma 2.11 in [30]): induced sublinks imply convex subcomplexes
    Used repeatedly in Construction 4.9 to ensure A0 and the attached strips form a convex subcomplex.
  • standard math Kielak's fibering theorem: virtually RFRS group with vanishing first L2-Betti number has a finite-index subgroup that algebraically fibers
    Used in Theorem 3.1 to pass from vanishing b1^(2) to virtual algebraic fibering.
  • standard math Davis's computation of H*(W,RW) and the Davis-Dymara-Januszkiewicz-Okun weighted L2-cohomology theory imply b1^(2)=0 for sufficiently thick buildings over one-ended Coxeter groups
    Used in Theorem 3.1 to verify the hypothesis of Kielak's theorem.
  • domain assumption Fischer's theorem: if L is a flag triangulation of a closed orientable surface of genus >= 1, the visual boundary of the Davis complex of W_L is the Pontryagin sphere
    Used in Theorem 5.1; the surface triangulations produced by Lemma 5.3 have positive genus because they contain non-planar branching graphs.
  • standard math Dirac's rigid-circuit theorem: a non-complete graph with no separating clique contains an induced (full) cycle of length >= 4
    Used in Theorem 3.1 to extract a full cycle from Th1(Xn), along which a special subgroup with (Z/2)^N vertex groups sits.
  • standard math Bourdon's conformal dimension formula for Fuchsian buildings: over a fixed polygon, the boundary conformal dimension grows without bound with the thickness of the building
    Used in Theorem 3.1 to show Confdim(WThN(Xn)) -> infinity as N -> infinity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Conformal dimension bounds, Pontryagin sphere boundaries, and algebraic fibering of right-angled Coxeter groups." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ULTJMJUO

@misc{pith2026251003430,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Conformal dimension bounds, Pontryagin sphere boundaries, and algebraic fibering of right-angled Coxeter groups},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ULTJMJUO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.03430}
}
abstract

We introduce a graph-theoretic condition, called $(n,m)$--branching, that ensures a combinatorial round tree with controlled branching parameters can be quasi-isometrically embedded in the Davis complex of the right-angled Coxeter group defined by the graph. This construction yields a lower bound on the conformal dimension of the boundary of such a hyperbolic group. We exhibit numerous families of graphs with this property, including many 1-dimensional spherical buildings. We prove an embedding result, showing that under mild hypotheses a flag-no-square graph embeds as an induced subgraph in a flag-no-square triangulation of a closed surface. We use this to embed our branching graphs into graphs presenting hyperbolic right-angled Coxeter groups with Pontryagin sphere boundary. We conclude there are examples of such groups with conformal dimension tending to infinity, and hence, there are infinitely many quasi-isometry classes within this family. We use conformal dimension to show that recent work of Lafont--Minemyer--Sorcar--Stover--Wells can be upgraded to conclude that for every $n \geq 2$ there exist infinitely many quasi-isometry classes of hyperbolic right-angled Coxeter groups that virtually algebraically fiber and have virtual cohomological dimension $n$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.03430 by the authors.

Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. An illustration of the (3, 6)–branching condition. The condition ensures that certain subgraphs, drawn with thickened edges, can be extended to contain induced 6-cycles that intersect only in the original thickened subgraph. Theorem 4.2. [37, Theorem 7.2] Let X be a hyperbolic polygonal 2-complex, and let A be a combina￾torial round tree with vertical branching V ≥ 2 and horizontal branching H ≥ 2. Suppose that A(1)… view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. The initial steps of the round tree construction with (2, 6)–branching. The initial subcomplex A0 consists of two squares incident to the marked vertex. The outer edge path is drawn in blue. At the first blue edge we attach two new squares, colored red and green. At the first interior vertex of the blue path we add four more red squares such that the five red squares plus the square from A0 make a 6–cycle of squares… view at source ↗
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. The replacement simplices for the absolute and relative subdivisions. Suppose C is an induced 4-cycle in X′ . Then C is not contained in L since L is flag-no-square. Suppose that C contains a new vertex in the interior of a 2-simplex σ of X. Then at least 3 of the vertices of C are contained in σ. If all vertices of C are in σ we are done since each replacement 2-simplex is flag-no-square and full in X′ . Otherwise,… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Hexagon H(i, j) containing segment u w v. Consider the hexagons H(i, i) for i ∈ Fq. Their pairwise intersection is P, and S i∈Fq H(i, i) is an induced subgraph by Theorem 6.1. Now suppose u v is a single edge of Pq. Up to the action of Aut(Pq) we may assume u = ⟨e1⟩ …
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.2. Figure 6.2: Hexagon H(i, j, k) containing edge u v. Suppose that i1 ̸= i2 and j1 ̸= j2, and consider hexagons of the form H(i1, j1, k1) and H(i2, j2, k2). By Theorem 6.1, the only possibility for H(i1, j1, k1) ∪ H(i2, j2, k2) not to be an induced subgraph is if, in the notation …
Figure 6.3
Figure 6.3. Figure 6.3: A pair of independent hexagons in Tp,m sharing one edge. When n > 2 we make different choices. Block B0 has t–many neighbors, one Point from each of the Parts. Choose any n < t − 1 of them, distinct from each other and from (0, 0), and assume, up to renumbering that …
Figure 6.4
Figure 6.4. Figure 6.4: n–many independent hexagons in Tp,m when n > 2. Now suppose the induced path P has length two. This case is easier: the union is always induced, by Theorem 6.1, so one only needs to find enough hexagons. This is easy because any choice of 3 Points from distinct Parts…
Figure 6.5
Figure 6.5. Figure 6.5: Hexagon Hi in Bq with base edge (0, 0) − [0, 0]. Checking that there are many hexagons for the case that the base is a segment of length 2 is easy, and, as in previous cases, we do not need to choose very carefully to avoid the union being non-induced, since this is …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Akin,Manifold phenomena in the theory of polyhedra, Trans

    E. Akin,Manifold phenomena in the theory of polyhedra, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.143(1969), e413, 473

    1969

  2. [2]

    Araujo-Pardo and D

    G. Araujo-Pardo and D. Leemans,Edge-girth-regular graphs arising from biaffine planes and Suzuki groups, Discrete Math.345(2022), no. 10, Paper No. 112991, 10

    2022

  3. [3]

    T. Beth, D. Jungnickel, and H. Lenz,Design theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986

    1986

  4. [4]

    Bounds and X

    J. Bounds and X. Xie,Quasi-isometric rigidity of a class of right-angled Coxeter groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 148(2020), no. 2, 553–568

    2020

  5. [5]

    Bourdon,Immeubles hyperboliques, dimension conforme et rigidité de Mostow, Geom

    M. Bourdon,Immeubles hyperboliques, dimension conforme et rigidité de Mostow, Geom. Funct. Anal.7(1997), no. 2, 245–268

    1997

  6. [6]

    Bourdon,Au bord de certains polyèdres hyperboliques, Ann

    M. Bourdon,Au bord de certains polyèdres hyperboliques, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)45(1995), no. 1, 119–141

    1995

  7. [7]

    Bourdon,Structure conforme au bord et flot géodésique d’unCAT(−1)-espace, Enseign

    M. Bourdon,Structure conforme au bord et flot géodésique d’unCAT(−1)-espace, Enseign. Math. (2)41(1995), no. 1-2, 63–102

    1995

  8. [8]

    Bourdon and B

    M. Bourdon and B. Kleiner,Some applications ofℓp-cohomology to boundaries of Gromov hyperbolic spaces, Groups Geom. Dyn.9(2015), no. 2, 435–478

    2015

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    M. R. Bridson and A. Haefliger,Metric spaces of non-positive curvature, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wis- senschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 319, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999

    1999

  2. [10]

    Buyalo and V

    S. Buyalo and V. Schroeder,Elements of asymptotic geometry, EMS Monogr. Math., European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2007

    2007

  3. [11]

    Caprace,Buildings with isolated subspaces and relatively hyperbolic Coxeter groups, Innov

    P.-E. Caprace,Buildings with isolated subspaces and relatively hyperbolic Coxeter groups, Innov. Incidence Geom. 10(2009), 15–31

    2009

  4. [12]

    Chinen and T

    N. Chinen and T. Hosaka,Hyperbolic right-angled Coxeter groups with boundaries as a Sierpiński carpet and a Menger curve, Topology Appl.260(2019), 70–85

    2019

  5. [13]

    Dani,The large-scale geometry of right-angled Coxeter groups, Handbook of group actions

    P. Dani,The large-scale geometry of right-angled Coxeter groups, Handbook of group actions. V, Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM), vol. 48, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, [2020]©2020, pp. 107–141

    2020

  6. [14]

    P. Dani, M. Haulmark, and G. Walsh,Right-angled Coxeter groups with non-planar boundary, Groups Geom. Dyn. 17(2023), no. 1, 127–155

    2023

  7. [15]

    Danielski,Right-angled Coxeter groups with Menger curve boundary, Bull

    D. Danielski,Right-angled Coxeter groups with Menger curve boundary, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc.54(2022), no. 3, 977–995

    2022

  8. [16]

    Danielski, M

    D. Danielski, M. Kapovich, and J. Świątkowski,Complete characterizations of hyperbolic Coxeter groups with Sierpiński curve boundary and with Menger curve boundary, Fund. Math.267(2024), 117–128

    2024

  9. [17]

    Daverman and T

    R. Daverman and T. Thickstun,Degree one, monotone self maps of the Pontryagin sphere are near homeomorphisms, Pacific J. Math303(2019), no. 1, e93, 132

    2019

  10. [18]

    M. W. Davis,Buildings are CAT(0), Geometry and cohomology in group theory (Durham, 1994), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 252, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 108–123

    1994

  11. [19]

    M. W. Davis,The geometry and topology of Coxeter groups, London Math. Soc. Monogr. Ser., vol. 32, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008. CONFORMAL DIMENSION, PONTRYAGIN BOUNDARIES, AND ALGEBRAIC FIBERING OF RACGS 21

    2008

  12. [20]

    M. W. Davis, J. Dymara, T. Januszkiewicz, J. Meier, and B. Okun,Compactly supported cohomology of buildings, Comment. Math. Helv.85(2010), no. 3, 551–582

    2010

  13. [21]

    M. W. Davis, J. Dymarya, T. Januszkiewicz, and B. Okun,WeightedL2-cohomology of Coxeter groups, Geom. Topol.11(2007), no. 1, 47–138

    2007

  14. [22]

    G. A. Dirac,On rigid circuit graphs, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg25(1961), 197–262

    1961

  15. [23]

    Douba, G.-S

    S. Douba, G.-S. Lee, L. Marquis, and L. Ruffoni,Convex cocompact groups in real hyperbolic spaces with limit set a Pontryagin sphere, preprint (2025),arXiv:2502.09470v2

    2025

  16. [24]

    A. N. Dranishnikov,Boundaries of Coxeter groups and simplicial complexes with given links, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 137(1999), no. 2, 139–151

    1999

  17. [25]

    Feit and G

    W. Feit and G. Higman,The nonexistence of certain generalized polygons, J. Algebra1(1964), e114, 131

    1964

  18. [26]

    Field, R

    E. Field, R. Gupta, R. Lyman, and E. Stark,Conformal dimension bounds for certain Coxeter group Bowditch boundaries, preprint,arXiv:2504.12404

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Fischer,Boundaries of right-angled Coxeter groups with manifold nerves, Topology42(2003), no

    H. Fischer,Boundaries of right-angled Coxeter groups with manifold nerves, Topology42(2003), no. 2, 423–446

    2003

  20. [28]

    Frost,Round trees and conformal dimension in random groups: low density to high density, preprint, arXiv:2204.05165

    J. Frost,Round trees and conformal dimension in random groups: low density to high density, preprint, arXiv:2204.05165

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Gromov,Asymptotic invariants of infinite groups, Geometric group theory, Vol

    M. Gromov,Asymptotic invariants of infinite groups, Geometric group theory, Vol. 2 (Sussex, 1991), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 182, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993, pp. 1–295

    1991

  22. [30]

    Haglund and D

    F. Haglund and D. T. Wise,Special cube complexes, Geom. Funct. Anal.17(2008), no. 5, 1551–1620

    2008

  23. [31]

    Hoda and J

    N. Hoda and J. Świątkowski,Trees of graphs as boundaries of hyperbolic groups, preprint (2025),arXiv:2312.15827

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Jakobsche,Homogeneous cohomology manifolds which are inverse limits, Fund

    W. Jakobsche,Homogeneous cohomology manifolds which are inverse limits, Fund. Math.137(1991), no. 2, 81–95

    1991

  25. [33]

    Jankiewicz, S

    K. Jankiewicz, S. Norin, and D. T. Wise,Virtually fibering right-angled Coxeter groups, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu20 (2021), no. 3, 957–987

    2021

  26. [34]

    Kielak,Residually finite rationally solvable groups and virtual fibring, J

    D. Kielak,Residually finite rationally solvable groups and virtual fibring, J. Amer. Math. Soc.33(2020), no. 2, 451–486

    2020

  27. [35]

    Lafont, B

    J.-F. Lafont, B. Minemyer, G. Sorcar, M. Stover, and J. Wells,High-dimensional hyperbolic Coxeter groups that virtually fiber, Math. Ann. (in press)

  28. [36]

    J. M. Mackay,Conformal dimension and random groups, Geom. Funct. Anal.22(2012), no. 1, 213–239

    2012

  29. [37]

    J. M. Mackay,Conformal dimension via subcomplexes for small cancellation and random groups, Math. Ann.364 (2016), no. 3-4, 937–982

    2016

  30. [38]

    J. M. Mackay and J. T. Tyson,Conformal dimension, Univ. Lecture Ser., vol. 54, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010, Theory and application

    2010

  31. [39]

    Moussong,Hyperbolic Coxeter groups, Ph.D

    G. Moussong,Hyperbolic Coxeter groups, Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State, 1988, p. 55

    1988

  32. [40]

    Osajda,A construction of hyperbolic Coxeter groups, Comment

    D. Osajda,A construction of hyperbolic Coxeter groups, Comment. Math. Helv.88(2013), no. 2, 353–367

    2013

  33. [41]

    Pansu,Dimension conforme et sphère à l’infini des variétés à courbure négative, Ann

    P. Pansu,Dimension conforme et sphère à l’infini des variétés à courbure négative, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I Math.14(1989), no. 2, 177–212

    1989

  34. [42]

    Ronan,Lectures on buildings, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2009, Updated and revised

    M. Ronan,Lectures on buildings, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2009, Updated and revised

    2009

  35. [43]

    Schesler and M

    E. Schesler and M. C. B. Zaremsky,Random subcomplexes of finite buildings, and fibering of commutator subgroups of right-angled Coxeter groups, J. Topol.16(2023), no. 1, 20–56

    2023

  36. [44]

    Stark,Visual metrics on boundaries of hyperbolic spaces, preprint,arXiv:2506.10108

    E. Stark,Visual metrics on boundaries of hyperbolic spaces, preprint,arXiv:2506.10108

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Świątkowski,Hyperbolic Coxeter groups with Sierpiński carpet boundary, Bull

    J. Świątkowski,Hyperbolic Coxeter groups with Sierpiński carpet boundary, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc.48(2016), no. 4, 708–716

    2016

  38. [46]

    Świątkowski,Trees of manifolds as boundaries of spaces and groups, Geom

    J. Świątkowski,Trees of manifolds as boundaries of spaces and groups, Geom. Topol.24(2020), no. 2, 593–622

    2020

  39. [47]

    Xie,Quasi-isometric rigidity of Fuchsian buildings, Topology45(2006), no

    X. Xie,Quasi-isometric rigidity of Fuchsian buildings, Topology45(2006), no. 1, 101–169. TU Wien, Institute of Discrete Mathematics and Geometry, Wiedener Hauptstrasse 8-10, 1040 Vienna, Austria, 0000-0002-6340-469X Email address:christopher.cashen@tuwien.ac.at Department of M...

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.