Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 137 references

Generalized hyperbolicity for diffeomorphisms of Banach spaces

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a generalized (C,λ)-structure — a stable/unstable splitting that may be discontinuous and is invariant only by inclusion — is sufficient for the principal dynamical consequences of hyperbolicity in Banach spaces: Lipsc

desk verdict A new inclusion-only hyperbolicity framework for Banach diffeomorphisms that buys the standard consequences under reflexivity—and the abstract fails to say so. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.05499 v3 pith:QOVAPLC7 submitted 2025-10-07 math.DS math.FA

Sergey Tikhomirov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.FA MSC 37D0537D2037C5046B10
keywords generalizedhyperbolicityBanachspacesLipschitzshadowingperiodicchainrecurrenceC1-robustnessstructuralstabilitydiscontinuoussplitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces generalized (C,λ)-structure for C^1 diffeomorphisms of Banach spaces, weakening hyperbolicity in two ways: the stable/unstable splitting may be discontinuous, and the invariance conditions are inclusions rather than equalities. The central claim is that this weaker structure still forces the main hyperbolic consequences: finite Lipschitz shadowing in any Banach space; full Lipschitz shadowing, periodic shadowing, density of periodic points in the chain-recurrent set, and C^1-robustness in reflexive spaces; and, under extra continuity or constancy assumptions, semi-structural and structural stability. If correct, this shows that the essential mechanism behind shadowing and stability is the uniform exponential contraction/expansion along the two subspaces, not the continuity of the splitting or equality of the invariant bundles. The paper also provides examples — a nonlinear weighted shift, a product of Morse-Smale maps, and a pushforward of a vector field — that satisfy the new structure but lie outside previously known frameworks.

What carries the argument

The central object is the generalized (C,λ)-structure: a family of bounded projections P_x, Q_x with P_x+Q_x=Id and uniform norms, for which the stable and unstable subspaces E^s_x=P_xB and E^u_x=Q_xB satisfy the inclusion invariance Df(x)E^s_x ⊆ E^s_{f(x)} and Df^{-1}(x)E^u_x ⊆ E^u_{f^{-1}(x)}, together with exponential estimates |Df^n(x)v^s| ≤ Cλ^n|v^s| and |Df^{-n}(x)v^u| ≤ Cλ^n|v^u|. The load-bearing technical tool is the bounded solution property for inhomogeneous linear equations v_{k+1}=A_k v_k + w_{k+1}; the paper proves that the sequence of derivatives along any trajectory of a diffeomorphism with generalized (C,λ)-structure has this property, that the property is robust under small

What would settle it

Construct a non-reflexive Banach space B and a C^1 diffeomorphism f satisfying generalized (C,λ)-structure and conditions (4)–(7) that admits an infinite pseudotrajectory with errors tending to zero but no true trajectory within a uniform Lipschitz distance. Such an example would show that Theorem 2's reflexivity hypothesis is essential; the paper's own Example 2 on l∞ is a candidate test case, but the author verifies shadowing there by coordinate-wise reasoning.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core discovery is that a generalized hyperbolic structure for nonlinear diffeomorphisms of Banach spaces — defined by a splitting with uniformly bounded projections, inclusion-only invariance under Df and Df^{-1}, and exponential contraction/expansion estimates, with no continuity required — implies Lipschitz shadowing (finite always, infinite under reflexivity), Lipschitz periodic shadowing, density of periodic points in the chain recurrent set, and C^1-robustness of the structure. The proofs avoid fixed point theorems on spaces of orbits by working with inhomogeneous linear equations along pseudotrajectories and an inductive shadowing construction; reflexivity enters only to pa

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Banach space is reflexive (or, for the finite-shadowing and semi-structural results, that the derivative is globally bounded and uniformly continuous); if reflexivity fails, the argument that finite-interval shadowing with a uniform constant extends to the whole line collapses, and Theorems 2–5 are unproved outside the special example.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, then the Lipschitz shadowing property — that any approximate trajectory with small errors is close to a true trajectory — holds for all diffeomorphisms with generalized (C,λ)-structure, with no continuity of the splitting needed.
  • Periodic orbits are dense in the chain-recurrent set, giving an infinite-dimensional analogue of the closing lemma / spectral decomposition for Axiom A systems.
  • The structure is C^1-robust: small C^1 perturbations again admit generalized (C,λ)-structure, with slightly worsened constants.
  • With uniformly continuous splitting, the diffeomorphism is two-sided semi-conjugate to each small perturbation; with constant stable/unstable subspaces, this upgrades to full structural stability.
  • The results apply to examples inaccessible to previous hyperbolicity theories, such as nonlinear shifts and infinite products of Morse-Smale maps, and the structure is preserved under conjugacy by diffeomorphisms with bounded derivative.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reflexivity assumption in Theorems 2–5 may be unnecessary; the paper itself notes that the non-reflexive example l∞ satisfies Lipschitz shadowing by a separate coordinate-wise argument, and the author states a belief that reflexivity is not essential. A natural testable extension is to prove or disprove Theorem 2 for arbitrary Banach spaces.
  • If the bounded solution property on finite intervals turns out to be equivalent to the strong bounded solution property in Banach spaces — a question the paper explicitly raises — then the shadowing and robustness results would generalize to non-reflexive spaces, and continuous selection theorems would likely play a role.
  • The framework points toward extensions to semigroups and semiflows in Banach spaces, where the inclusion condition (CL2) aligns naturally with nested spaces of solutions; the author flags this direction, noting that unbounded generators are a key obstacle.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a notion of generalized (C,λ)-structure for C^1 diffeomorphisms of Banach spaces. The structure allows a splitting into closed subspaces whose projections are uniformly bounded but not assumed continuous, and whose invariance is only one-sided (inclusions rather than equalities). The main results are: finite Lipschitz shadowing in arbitrary Banach spaces (Theorem 1); Lipschitz shadowing, Lipschitz periodic shadowing, density of periodic points in the chain-recurrent set, and C^1-robustness of the structure under the additional assumption that the Banach space is reflexive (Theorems 2–5); semi-structural stability under a uniformly continuous splitting (Theorem 6); and structural stability in a constant-splitting case (Theorem 7). The proofs use a Perron-sum construction for inhomogeneous linear equations, a nested-convex-set argument to pass from finite to infinite intervals, and graph-transform arguments for robustness. Several examples illustrate the definitions, including a weighted shift, an infinite product of one-dimensional Morse–Smale maps, and a pushforward operator.

Significance. If the main results are correct, this is a substantial contribution: it extends the hyperbolic paradigm to noncompact infinite-dimensional phase spaces while allowing discontinuous and inclusion-only invariant splittings, and it provides a Banach-space analogue of the Axiom A + strong transversality picture. The core shadowing theorems are proved in considerable detail, with explicit constants and a clean use of Smulian's nested-convex-set property. The paper also contains useful examples and openly discusses open problems and limitations. However, the advertised scope is wider than what is proved: Theorems 2–5 require reflexivity, and the semi-structural stability section contains a genuine proof gap. The result is therefore promising and likely repairable, but the manuscript as it stands needs revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §2 (Theorems 2–5)] The abstract and the introductory bullet list claim that, for C^1 diffeomorphisms of the whole Banach space satisfying (4)–(7), the paper establishes Lipschitz shadowing, periodic shadowing, density of periodic points, and C^1-robustness. Theorems 2–5, however, explicitly require B to be reflexive; Lemma 4, which is the only place reflexivity is used, is not available in non-reflexive spaces. The non-reflexive case is only illustrated by the special l^∞ example. Please restrict the abstract and the summary of results to the reflexive assumption, or clearly separate the statements that hold in arbitrary Banach spaces.
  2. [§8, Lemma 10 (proof of (B1)–(B2))] The proof of Lemma 10 uses the assertion that, for any fixed N, one can choose δ such that |β^n(x)−α^n(x)|≤δ_1 for n∈[1,N] uniformly in x, and similarly for negative iterates. This does not follow from condition (72) for arbitrary homeomorphisms α,β: C^0 closeness of α and β on the whole space does not imply C^0 closeness of their iterates without uniform continuity or Lipschitz bounds. In the intended application α=f and β=g do satisfy global Lipschitz estimates via (4)–(5), so the gap is repairable, but the lemma as stated is not proved. The statement should be amended (or the proof supplemented) with the needed regularity assumption.
  3. [§5.3, Lemma 6 and §8, Lemma 10] The unstable-side constructions are delegated to 'similarly': the construction of H^u_k and the proof of estimate (51) in Lemma 6, and the analogous construction of H^u_x in Lemma 10. Because the inclusion-only invariance makes the unstable side not an exact time-reversal of the stable side (the spaces F_k and the graph-transform target are involved), the asymmetry is real and the details are needed to rule out hidden loss of contraction or invertibility. In addition, the projection formula in (52) appears to contain an index error: the right composition should use T_k^{-1}, not T_{k+1}^{-1}. Please provide the full unstable-side argument and correct the formula.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Definition 14, (C-CL2)] The claimed equivalences are incorrect. A(x)E^s_x ⊆ E^s_{α(x)} is equivalent to Q(α(x))A(x)P_x = 0, not to Q(α(x))A(x) = A(x)Q(x); the latter equality expresses invariance of E^u under A, which is not assumed. Similarly, A^{-1}(x)E^u_{α(x)} ⊆ E^u_x is not equivalent to P(x)A^{-1}(x) = A^{-1}(x)P(α(x)). The proofs use only the inclusion form, so this is not load-bearing, but the definition should be corrected.
  2. [§6.2, proof of Theorem 2] In the paragraph after Lemma 3, the text says 'By Theorem 2, for any finite interval I ...' but the finite shadowing result being invoked is Theorem 1, not Theorem 2.
  3. [§8, proof of Theorem 6, Step 2] There are typos in the fixed-point argument for h_2: equation (92) should use O_g rather than O_f, and later 'O_f ◦ G_g' should be 'O_g ◦ G_g'.
  4. [Example 2, p=∞ case] The assertion that for p=∞ small C^1 perturbations also satisfy generalized (C,λ)-structure is plausible but only sketched. Since the paper explicitly notes that the reflexivity-based proof does not apply, this statement should be formulated as a proposition with proof or as a conjecture.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: theorems are deductions from the proposed definition; reflexivity is an explicit hypothesis, not a hidden input.

full rationale

The paper's advertised results are derived, not assumed: Lipschitz shadowing, periodic shadowing, periodic-point density and C^1-robustness are proved from the definition of generalized (C,λ)-structure plus explicit regularity bounds (4)-(7) and, where needed, reflexivity of B. The crucial finite-to-infinite step (Lemma 4) is transparently identified as the only place reflexivity is used, and both the abstract and Section 4 state this condition; this is an honest hypothesis, not a fitted or smuggled input. The main theorems are self-contained with proofs included (e.g., the bounded solution property in Lemma 2, the robustness Lemma 6, and the shadowing constructions in Sections 6-7). The prior (C,λ)-structure theory from [106] is used as a benchmark and motivation, not as a load-bearing step for the Banach-space results. Self-citations to the author's earlier work (e.g., [92, 130, 132]) occur only as proof techniques, with the needed arguments either reproduced or standard; no central claim reduces to an unverified self-citation. The main discrepancy is stylistic: the abstract's first paragraph omits the reflexivity assumption for infinite shadowing and robustness, whereas the theorem statements in the body are explicit. This is a correctness-precision issue about assumptions, not circularity, since no conclusion is equivalent to its hypothesis by construction and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Under the hard rules, that discrepancy does not warrant a circularity flag. Hence the honest finding is a score of 1: minor presentational self-citation, but the derivation is essentially self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is pure mathematics: the only new object is the definition of generalized (C,λ)-structure and its associated projections/subspaces, which are the hypothesis rather than ad hoc entities introduced to force a conclusion. The free parameters C, λ are part of the input definition. The main axioms are standard Banach-space theorems plus the stated global regularity assumptions.

free parameters (2)
  • C
    Constant bounding the norms of the projections P_x, Q_x in the generalized (C,λ)-structure (CL1). Existence is part of the hypothesis; the theorems are uniform in C.
  • λ
    Contraction rate in the exponential estimates (CL3); any λ∈(0,1) is allowed. Assumed in the definition, not fitted to data.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Reflexivity of B and the nested-convex-set theorem (Lemma 1, after Smulian [125])
    Used in Lemma 4 to pass from finite-interval to whole-line bounded solution property; the paper states this is the only place reflexivity enters (Section 4).
  • domain assumption Global boundedness and uniform continuity of Df (conditions (4)–(7))
    Assumed throughout for all main theorems to control the nonlinear remainder r(|v|); this restricts the class of admissible diffeomorphisms of the whole space.
  • domain assumption Existence of a uniformly bounded splitting with exponential estimates (Definition 2, CL1–CL3)
    This is the central hypothesis of all theorems; the results are conditional on a map admitting such a structure.
  • standard math Axiom of Choice
    Used in the proof of Theorem 5 to choose a representative point on each orbit of the perturbed diffeomorphism g; explicitly flagged in Remark 10.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generalized hyperbolicity for diffeomorphisms of Banach spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QOVAPLC7

@misc{pith2026251005499,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generalized hyperbolicity for diffeomorphisms of Banach spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QOVAPLC7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.05499}
}
abstract

We introduce generalized hyperbolicity for nonlinear dynamics in Banach spaces. The definition allows the stable/unstable splitting to be discontinuous and requires only inclusions, rather than equalities, in the invariance conditions for both subspaces. On smooth compact manifolds, generalized hyperbolicity is equivalent to Axiom~A and the strong transversality condition, providing a finite-dimensional calibration of the proposed Banach-space theory. For $C^1$-diffeomorphisms of the whole Banach space such that $Df$ and $D(f^{-1})$ are globally bounded and $Df$ is uniformly continuous, we establish the principal dynamical consequences of generalized hyperbolicity: Lipschitz shadowing, density of periodic points in the chain-recurrent set, and robustness under perturbations small in the uniform $C^1$ distance. The shadowing result requires no continuity of the splitting, and shadowing trajectories need not be unique. Under the additional assumption that the splitting is uniformly continuous, we prove semi-structural stability. If, in addition, the subspace $E^s_x\oplus (Df(x))^{-1}E^u_{f(x)}$ is independent of $x$, we obtain structural stability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

137 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [67]

    Lani-Wayda

    B. Lani-Wayda. Hyperbolic sets, shadowing and persistence for noninvertible mappings in Banach spaces. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series vol. 334, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 1995

    1995

  2. [127]

    Steinlein, H.-O

    H. Steinlein, H.-O. Walther. Hyperbolic sets, transversal homoclinic trajectories, and symbolic dynam- ics forC 1-maps in banach spaces. J. Dyn. Differ. Equations, 2 (1990), 325-365

    1990

  3. [1]

    D. V. Anosov.On a class of invariant sets of smooth dynamical systems.Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Nonlinear Oscillators (Kiev, 1970). Vol. 2. Mathematical Institute of the Ukranian Academy of Science, Kiev, 1970, pp. 39–45

    1970

  4. [2]

    Apushkinskaya, S

    D. Apushkinskaya, S. Repin, S. Tikhomirov. A shadowing approach to aposteriori estimates for non- stable parabolic problems. Work in progress

  5. [3]

    J. M. Arrieta, A. N. Carvalho, C. R. Takaessu Jr.Shadowing for Infinite Dimensional Dynamical Systems.arXiv:2502.08315. (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  6. [4]

    Arrieta, A

    J. Arrieta, A. Carvalho, J. Hale.A damped hyperbolic equation with critical exponent.Commun. Partial Differ. Equations. 17 (1992), 841-866

    1992

  7. [5]

    Avila.Dynamics of Renormalization Operators.In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM 2010), Vol

    A. Avila.Dynamics of Renormalization Operators.In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM 2010), Vol. I, pp. 154–175. World Scientific (2011)

    2010

  8. [6]

    Avila, M

    A. Avila, M. Lyubich.The full renormalization horseshoe for unimodal maps of higher degree: expo- nential contraction along hybrid classes.Publications math´ ematiques de l’IH ´ES 114, 171–223 (2011)

    2011

Show all 137 references
  1. [7]

    Shadowing for infinite dimensional dynamics and exponential trichotomies

    L Backes, D Dragiˇ cevi´ c. Shadowing for infinite dimensional dynamics and exponential trichotomies. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A, Math. 151 (2021), 863-884

    2021

  2. [8]

    R. G. Bartle, L. M. Graves.Mappings between function spaces.Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 72 (1952), 400-413

    1952

  3. [9]

    Barreira, D

    L. Barreira, D. Dragiˇ cevi´ c, C. Valls. Admissibility and hyperbolicity. Springer, 2018

    2018

  4. [10]

    Bayart, E

    F. Bayart, E. Matheron. Dynamics of Linear Operators (Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 179). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009

    2009

  5. [11]

    Bernardes.On nested sequences of convex sets in Banach spaces.J

    N. Bernardes.On nested sequences of convex sets in Banach spaces.J. Math. Anal. Appl. 389 (2012), 558-561. 41

    2012

  6. [12]

    N. C. Bernardes Jr, A. Bonilla, V. M¨ uller, A. Peris.Distributional chaos for linear operators.J. Funct. Anal. 265 (2013), 2143-2163

    2013

  7. [13]

    N. C. Bernardes Jr., A. Bonilla, A. Peris, X. Wu.Distributional chaos for operators on Banach spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 459 (2018), 797-821

    2018

  8. [14]

    N. C. Bernardes Jr., B. M. Caraballo, U. B. Darji, V. V. F´ avaro, A. Peris.Generalized hyperbolicity, stability and expansivity for operators on locally convex spaces.J. Funct. Anal. 288 (2025), 110696

    2025

  9. [15]

    Bernardes, P

    N. Bernardes, P. Cirilo, U. Darji, A. Messaoudi, E. Pujals.Expansivity and shadowing in linear dy- namics.J. Math. Anal. Appl. 461 (2018) 796–816

    2018

  10. [16]

    Bernardes Jr., F

    N. Bernardes Jr., F. Mart ´ ınez-Gim´ enez, F. Rodenas.On Notions of Expansivity for Operators on Locally Convex Spaces.arXiv:2509.12410 (2025)

    2025

  11. [17]

    Bernardes, A

    N. Bernardes, A. Messaoudi.A generalized Grobman-Hartman theorem.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 148 (2020), 4351-4360

    2020

  12. [18]

    N. C. Bernardes Jr., A. Messaoudi.Shadowing and structural stability for operators.Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst. 41 (2021), 961-980

    2021

  13. [19]

    Bernardes, A

    N. Bernardes, A. Peris.On shadowing and chain recurrence in linear dynamics.Adv. Math. 441 (2024), 109539

    2024

  14. [20]

    C. M. Blazquez.Transverse Homoclinic Orbits in Periodically Perturbed Parabolic Equations.Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 10 (1986), 1277–1291

    1986

  15. [21]

    Boffetta, S

    G. Boffetta, S. Musacchio.Dimensional effects in Rayleigh-Taylor mixing, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 380 (2022), 20210084

    2022

  16. [22]

    J. M. Borwein, A. L. Dontchev.On the Bartle–Graves Theorem.Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 131 (2003), 2553–2560

    2003

  17. [23]

    R. Bowen. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms. Lect. Notes Math. 470, Springer, Berlin, 1975

    1975

  18. [24]

    Carvalho, J

    A. Carvalho, J. Langa, J. Robinson, Attractors for infinite-dimensional non-autonomous dynamical systems. Vol. 182. Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

    2012

  19. [25]

    de Carvalho, M

    A. de Carvalho, M. Lyubich, M. Martens, Renormalization in the H´ enon Family, I: Universality but Non-Rigidity. J. Stat. Phys. 121 (2005), 611–669

    2005

  20. [26]

    Chicone, Y

    C. Chicone, Y. Latushkin. Evolution Semigroups in Dynamical Systems and Differential Equations. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 70. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999

    1999

  21. [27]

    S. Chow, X. Lin, K. Palmer.A shadowing lemma with applications to semilinear parabolic equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20, 547-557 (1989)

    1989

  22. [28]

    Cirilo, B

    P. Cirilo, B. Gollobit, E. Pujals.Dynamics of generalized hyperbolic linear operators.Adv. Math. 387 (2021): 107830

    2021

  23. [29]

    Coullet, C

    P. Coullet, C. Tresser,It´ erations d’endomorphismes et groupe de renormalisation.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. A–B 287 (1978), 577–580

    1978

  24. [30]

    W. A. Coppel. Dichotomies in stability theory. Lect. Notes Math. 629, Springer, Berlin, 1978 42

    1978

  25. [31]

    Crovisier, M

    S. Crovisier, M. Lyubich, E. Pujals, J. Yang, A Priori Bounds for H´ enon-like Renormalization. arXiv:2411.13624 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Diamond, P

    P. Diamond, P. Kloeden, V. Kozyakin, A. Pokrovskii. Semi-Hyperbolicity and Bi-Shadowing. American Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 2012

    2012

  27. [33]

    Diekmann, S

    O. Diekmann, S. A. van Gils, S. M. Verduyn Lunel, H.-O. Walther. Delay Equations: Functional-, Complex-, and Nonlinear Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995

    1995

  28. [34]

    J. Diestel. Geometry of Banach Spaces – Selected Topics. Lect. Notes Math. 485, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg, 1975

    1975

  29. [35]

    Engel, R

    K.-J. Engel, R. Nagel. One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 2000. (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 194)

    2000

  30. [36]

    Fiedler, B

    B. Fiedler, B. Sandstede, A. Scheel, C. Wulff.Bifurcation from relative equilibria of noncompact group actions: skew products, meanders, and drifts.Doc. Math. 1 (1996), 479-505

    1996

  31. [37]

    Fiedler, D

    B. Fiedler, D. Turaev.Normal Forms, Resonances, and Meandering Tip Motions near Relative Equi- libria of Euclidean Group Actions.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 145 (1998), 129–159

    1998

  32. [38]

    Fisher, B

    T. Fisher, B. Hasselblatt. Hyperbolic Flows. Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS Press), Berlin, 2019

    2019

  33. [39]

    Foias, G

    C. Foias, G. Sell, R. Temam.Inertial manifolds for nonlinear evolutionary equations.J. Differ. Equa- tions. 73 (1988), 309-353

    1988

  34. [40]

    Gan.The star systemsX ∗ and a proof of theC 1 Ω-stability conjecture for flows, J

    S. Gan.The star systemsX ∗ and a proof of theC 1 Ω-stability conjecture for flows, J. Differ. Equations. 163(2000), 1-17

    2000

  35. [41]

    Gan.A generalized shadowing lemma.Discrete Contin

    S. Gan.A generalized shadowing lemma.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., vol. 8 (2002), 627-632

    2002

  36. [42]

    S. Gan, M. Li, S. Tikhomirov,Oriented Shadowing Property andΩ-Stability for Vector Fields.J. Dyn. Differ. Equations, 28 (2016), 225-237

    2016

  37. [43]

    S. Gan, L. Wen,Nonsingular star flows satisfy Axiom A and the no-cycle condition, Invent. Math. 164 (2006), 279–315

    2006

  38. [44]

    S. D. Glyzin, A. Y. Kolesov, N. K. Rozov.Expansive endomorphisms on the infinite-dimensional torus. Funct. Anal. Appl. 54 (2020), 241-256

    2020

  39. [45]

    S. D. Glyzin, A. Y. Kolesov, N. K. Rozov.One class of structurally stable endomorphisms on an infinite-dimensional torus.Differ. Equations 56 (2020), 1382-1386

    2020

  40. [46]

    S. D. Glyzin, A. Y. Kolesov, N. K. Rozov.On a class of Anosov diffeomorphisms on the infinite- dimensional torus.Izv. Math. 85 (2021), 177-227

    2021

  41. [47]

    S. D. Glyzin, A. Y. Kolesov, N. K. Rozov.On the Existence and Stability of an Infinite-Dimensional Invariant Torus.Math. Notes 109 (2021), 534-550

    2021

  42. [48]

    S. D. Glyzin, A. Y. Kolesov.A hyperbolicity criterion for a class of diffeomorphisms of an infinite- dimensional torus.Mat. Sb. 213 (2022), 50-95

    2022

  43. [49]

    S. D. Glyzin, A. Y. Kolesov.Dynamical systems on an infinite-dimensional torus: Fundamentals of hyperbolic theory.Tr. Mosk. Mat. Obs 84 (2023), 55-116. 43

    2023

  44. [50]

    S. D. Glyzin, A. Y. Kolesov.Topologically Mixing Diffeomorphisms on the Infinite-Dimensional Torus. Math. Notes 113 (2023), 859-863

    2023

  45. [51]

    S. D. Glyzin, A. Y. Kolesov.On Some Properties of the Shift on an Infinite-Dimensional Torus.Differ. Equations 59 (2023), 867-879

    2023

  46. [52]

    S. D. Glyzin, A. Y. Kolesov.Cone criterion on an infinite-dimensional torus.Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Mat. 88 (2024), 82-117

    2024

  47. [53]

    Godefroy, J

    G. Godefroy, J. H. Shapiro. Operators with dense, invariant, cyclic vector manifolds. J. Funct. Anal. 98 (1991), 229–269

    1991

  48. [54]

    Grosse-Erdmann, A

    K.-G. Grosse-Erdmann, A. Peris Manguillot. Linear Chaos (Universitext). Springer, London, 2011

    2011

  49. [55]

    Guckenheimer, R

    J. Guckenheimer, R. F. Williams,Structural stability of Lorenz attractors, Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes ´Etud. Sci., 50 (1979), 59–72

    1979

  50. [56]

    J. K. Hale, S. M. Verduyn Lunel. Introduction to Functional Differential Equations. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993

    1993

  51. [57]

    Hayashi,Connecting invariant manifolds and the solution of theC 1 stability andΩ-stability conjec- tures for flows, Ann

    S. Hayashi,Connecting invariant manifolds and the solution of theC 1 stability andΩ-stability conjec- tures for flows, Ann. of Math. (2), 145 (1997), 81-137

    1997

  52. [58]

    D. Henry. Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations. Lect. Notes Math. 840, Springer- Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 1981

    1981

  53. [59]

    Henry.Exponential dichotomies, the shadowing lemma and homoclinic orbits in Banach spaces

    D. Henry.Exponential dichotomies, the shadowing lemma and homoclinic orbits in Banach spaces. Resenhas do Instituto de Matem´ atica e Estat ´ ıstica da Universidade de S˜ ao Paulo, 1 (1994), 381-401

    1994

  54. [60]

    Hochs, A.J

    P. Hochs, A.J. Roberts,Normal forms and invariant manifolds for nonlinear, non-autonomous PDEs, viewed as ODEs in infinite dimensions. J. Differ. Equations, 267 (2019), 7263-7312

    2019

  55. [61]

    B. Hou, G. Tian, S. Zhu. Approximation of chaotic operators. J. Operator Theory 67 (2012), 469–493

    2012

  56. [62]

    N. T. Huy, N. V. Minh.Exponential dichotomy of difference equations and applications to evolution equations on the half-line.Comput. Math. Appl., 42 (2001), 301-311

    2001

  57. [63]

    Jolly.Explicit construction of an inertial manifold for a reaction diffusion equation.J

    M. Jolly.Explicit construction of an inertial manifold for a reaction diffusion equation.J. Differ. Equa- tions, 78 (1989), 220-261

    1989

  58. [64]

    Katok, B

    A. Katok, B. Hasselblatt. Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Vol. 54. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    1995

  59. [65]

    Latushkin, T

    Y. Latushkin, T. Randolph.Dichotomy of differential equations on Banach spaces and an algebra of weighted translation operators.Integral Equations and Operator Theory 23 (1995), 472-500

    1995

  60. [66]

    Latushkin, T

    Y. Latushkin, T. Randolph, R. Schnaubelt.Exponential dichotomy and mild solutions of nonau- tonomous equations in Banach spaces.J. Dyn. Differ. Equations, 10 (1998), 489–510

    1998

  61. [68]

    Lani-Wayda.Persistence of Poincar´ e mappings in functional differential equations (with application to structural stability of complicated behavior).J

    B. Lani-Wayda.Persistence of Poincar´ e mappings in functional differential equations (with application to structural stability of complicated behavior).J. Dyn. Diff. Equat. 7 (1995) 1–71. 44

    1995

  62. [69]

    Lani-Wayda.Erratic solutions of simple delay equations.Trans

    B. Lani-Wayda.Erratic solutions of simple delay equations.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 351 (1999), 901- 945

    1999

  63. [70]

    Charles Li

    Y. Charles Li. Chaos In Partial Differential Equations. International Press., 2004

    2004

  64. [71]

    Li,Orbital shadowing and stability for vector fields.J

    M. Li,Orbital shadowing and stability for vector fields.J. Differ. Equations, 269 (2020), 1360-1382

    2020

  65. [72]

    Li.Chaos and Shadowing Lemma for Autonomous Systems of Infinite Dimensions.Journal of Dy- namics and Differential Equations 15, 699–730 (2003)

    Y. Li.Chaos and Shadowing Lemma for Autonomous Systems of Infinite Dimensions.Journal of Dy- namics and Differential Equations 15, 699–730 (2003)

    2003

  66. [73]

    Lian, L.-S

    Z. Lian, L.-S. Young. Lyapunov exponents, periodic orbits, and horseshoes for semiflows on Hilbert spaces. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (2012), 637-665

    2012

  67. [74]

    de la Llave.Invariant manifolds associated to nonresonant spectral subspaces.J

    R. de la Llave.Invariant manifolds associated to nonresonant spectral subspaces.J. Stat. Phys., 87 (1997), 211–249

    1997

  68. [75]

    de la Llave.A Smooth Center Manifold Theorem which Applies to Some Ill-Posed Partial Differential Equations with Unbounded Nonlinearities.J

    R. de la Llave.A Smooth Center Manifold Theorem which Applies to Some Ill-Posed Partial Differential Equations with Unbounded Nonlinearities.J. Dyn. Diff. Equat. 21, 371–415 (2009)

    2009

  69. [76]

    Lomonaco,Parabolic-like mappings.Ergodic Theory Dyn

    L. Lomonaco,Parabolic-like mappings.Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst. 35 (2015), 2171–2197

    2015

  70. [77]

    A. Lunardi. Analytic Semigroups and Optimal Regularity in Parabolic Problems. Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 1995

    1995

  71. [78]

    Lyubich.Feigenbaum–Coullet–Tresser universality and Milnor’s Hairiness Conjecture.Ann

    M. Lyubich.Feigenbaum–Coullet–Tresser universality and Milnor’s Hairiness Conjecture.Ann. Math. (2), 149 (1999), 319–420

    1999

  72. [79]

    Lyubich, M

    M. Lyubich, M. Martens.Renormalization in the H´ enon Family, II: The Heteroclinic Web.Invent. Math., 186 (2011), 115–189

    2011

  73. [80]

    Lyubich, M

    M. Lyubich, M. Martens.Probabilistic Universality in Two-Dimensional Dynamics.Commun. Math. Phys., 383 (2021), 1295–1359

    2021

  74. [81]

    A. A. Mailybaev, A. Raibekas.Spontaneous stochasticity and renormalization group in discrete multi- scale dynamics.Commun. Math. Phys., 401 (2023), 2643-2671

    2023

  75. [82]

    A. A. Mailybaev, A. Raibekas.Spontaneously stochastic Arnold’s cat.Arnold Math. J., 9 (2023), 339- 357

    2023

  76. [83]

    A. D. Maizel. On stability of solutions of systems of differential equations. Ural. Politehn. Inst. Trudy, 51:20–50, 1954

    1954

  77. [84]

    Mart ´ ınez-Gimenez, P

    F. Mart ´ ınez-Gimenez, P. Oprocha, A. Peris. Distributional chaos for operators with full scrambled sets. Math. Z. 274 (2013), 603–612

    2013

  78. [85]

    Ma˜ n´ e.Characterizations of AS diffeomorphisms.Geometry and Topology, Lect

    R. Ma˜ n´ e.Characterizations of AS diffeomorphisms.Geometry and Topology, Lect. Notes Math. 597, p. 389–394. Springer, Berlin, 1977

    1977

  79. [86]

    Ma˜ n´ e.An ergodic closing lemma.Ann

    R. Ma˜ n´ e.An ergodic closing lemma.Ann. Math., 116 (1982), 503-540

    1982

  80. [87]

    Ma˜ n´ e.A proof of theC 1 stability conjecture.Publications Math´ ematiques de l’IH ´ES, 66 (1987), 161-210

    R. Ma˜ n´ e.A proof of theC 1 stability conjecture.Publications Math´ ematiques de l’IH ´ES, 66 (1987), 161-210

    1987

  81. [88]

    Menon, F

    G. Menon, F. Otto.Dynamic scaling in miscible viscous fingering, Comm. Math. Phys., 257 (2005), 303–317. 45

    2005

  82. [89]

    Messerschmidt.A Pointwise Lipschitz Selection Theorem.Set-Valued Var

    M. Messerschmidt.A Pointwise Lipschitz Selection Theorem.Set-Valued Var. Anal., 27 (2019), 223– 240

    2019

  83. [90]

    Michael.Continuous selections

    E. Michael.Continuous selections. I.Ann. Math., 63 (1956), 361–382

    1956

  84. [91]

    Michael.Continuous selections

    E. Michael.Continuous selections. II.Ann. Math., 64 (1956), 562–580

    1956

  85. [92]

    Monakov, S

    G. Monakov, S. Tikhomirov.Probabilistic shadowing in linear skew products.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 45 (2025), 391–409

    2025

  86. [93]

    C. A. Morales, M. J. Pac ´ ıfico, E. R. Pujals,Robust transitive singular sets for3-flows are partially hyperbolic attractors or repellers.Ann. Math. (2) 160 (2004), 375–432

    2004

  87. [94]

    Murakami.Oriented and Standard Shadowing Properties for Topological Flows.Tokyo J

    S. Murakami.Oriented and Standard Shadowing Properties for Topological Flows.Tokyo J. Math. 46 (2023) 381-400,

    2023

  88. [95]

    A. V. Osipov, S. Yu. Pilyugin, S. B. Tikhomirov.Periodic shadowing andΩ-stability.Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 15 (2010), 404-417

    2010

  89. [96]

    Palis.On the local structure of hyperbolic points in Banach spaces.An

    J. Palis.On the local structure of hyperbolic points in Banach spaces.An. Acad. Brasil. Ci. 40 (1968), 263–266

    1968

  90. [97]

    K. J. Palmer.Exponential dichotomies and transversal homoclinic points.J. Differ. Equations, 55 (1984), 225–256

    1984

  91. [98]

    K. J. Palmer.Exponential dichotomies and Fredholm operators.Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 104 (1988), 149–156

    1988

  92. [99]

    K.J. Palmer. Exponential dichotomies, the shadowing lemma and transversal homoclinic points. Dy- namics reported. Wiesbaden: Vieweg-Teubner Verlag, 1988. 265-306

    1988

  93. [100]

    K. Palmer. Shadowing in Dynamical Systems. Theory and Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000

    2000

  94. [101]

    K. J. Palmer, S. Yu. Pilyugin, S. Tikhomirov.Lipschitz shadowing and structural stability of flows.J. Differ. Equations 252 (2012), 1723-1747

    2012

  95. [102]

    A. Pazy. Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations. Springer, New York, 1983

    1983

  96. [103]

    Petrova, S

    Yu. Petrova, S. Tikhomirov, Ya. Efendiev.Propagating terrace in a two-tubes model of gravitational fingering.SIAM J. Math. Anal. 57 (2025), 30-64

    2025

  97. [104]

    Pilyugin.Shadowing in structurally stable flows.J

    S.Yu. Pilyugin.Shadowing in structurally stable flows.J. Differ. Equations, 140 (1997), 238–265

    1997

  98. [105]

    S. Yu. Pilyugin. Shadowing in dynamical systems. Springer, 2006

    2006

  99. [106]

    Yu Pilyugin.Generalizations of the notion of hyperbolicity.J

    S. Yu Pilyugin.Generalizations of the notion of hyperbolicity.J. Difference Equ. Appl. 12 (2006), 271–282

    2006

  100. [107]

    S. Yu. Pilyugin, K. Sakai. Shadowing and Hyperbolicity. Lect. Notes Math. 2193. Springer, Cham, 2017

    2017

  101. [108]

    S. Yu. Pilyugin, S. Tikhomirov.Sets of vector fields with various properties of shadowing of pseudo- trajectories.Dokl. Math. 422 (2008), 30-31. 46

    2008

  102. [109]

    S. Yu. Pilyugin.Variational shadowing.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Ser. B, 14 (2010), 733–737

    2010

  103. [110]

    S. Yu. Pilyugin, S. Tikhomirov.Lipschitz shadowing implies structural stability.Nonlinearity, 23 (2010), 2509-2515

    2010

  104. [111]

    S. Yu. Pilyugin, S. Tikhomirov.Vector fields with the oriented shadowing property.J. Differ. Equations, 248 (2010), 1345-1375

    2010

  105. [112]

    Pliss.Uniformly bounded solutions of linear systems of differential equations.Differentsialnye Uravneniya, 13 (1977), 883–891

    V.A. Pliss.Uniformly bounded solutions of linear systems of differential equations.Differentsialnye Uravneniya, 13 (1977), 883–891

    1977

  106. [113]

    Pliss.Sets of linear systems of differential equations with uniformly bounded solutions.Differ- entsialnye Uravneniya, 16 (1980), 1599–1616

    V.A. Pliss.Sets of linear systems of differential equations with uniformly bounded solutions.Differ- entsialnye Uravneniya, 16 (1980), 1599–1616

    1980

  107. [114]

    Pokutnyi.Weak chaos in difference equations.arXiv:2310.08220 (2023)

    O. Pokutnyi.Weak chaos in difference equations.arXiv:2310.08220 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  108. [115]

    P. A. Priezzhev, V. A. Priezzhev, S. B. Tikhomirov.Probabilistic shadowing for pseudotrajectories with decreasing errors.J. Math. Sci., 281 (2024), p142

    2024

  109. [116]

    Ragazzo.Chaos and integrability in a nonlinear wave equation.J

    C. Ragazzo.Chaos and integrability in a nonlinear wave equation.J. Dyn. Differ. Equations, 6 (1994), 227-244

    1994

  110. [117]

    J. W. Robbin.A structural stability theorem.Ann. Math., 94 (1971), 447–493

    1971

  111. [118]

    Robinson,Structural stability of vector fields, Ann

    C. Robinson,Structural stability of vector fields, Ann. Math. (2), 99 (1974), 154–175

    1974

  112. [119]

    Robinson.Structural stability ofC 1 diffeomorphisms.J

    C. Robinson.Structural stability ofC 1 diffeomorphisms.J. Differ. Equations, 22 (1976), 28-73

    1976

  113. [120]

    Robinson

    J. Robinson. Infinite-dimensional dynamical systems: an introduction to dissipative parabolic PDEs and the theory of global attractors. Cambridge University Press, 2001

    2001

  114. [121]

    Robinson.Computing inertial manifolds.Discrete Contin

    J. Robinson.Computing inertial manifolds.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 8 (2002), 815-834

    2002

  115. [122]

    W. Rudin. Functional Analysis. 2nd ed., McGraw–Hill, New York, 1991

    1991

  116. [123]

    G. R. Sell, Y. You. Dynamics of evolutionary equations. Springer Science & Business Media Vol. 143 (2013)

    2013

  117. [124]

    Slyusarchuk.Exponential dichotomy of solutions of discrete systems.Ukrain

    V. Slyusarchuk.Exponential dichotomy of solutions of discrete systems.Ukrain. Mat. Zh., 35 (1983), 109–115

    1983

  118. [125]

    Smulian.On the principle of inclusion in the space of the type (B).Mat

    V.L. Smulian.On the principle of inclusion in the space of the type (B).Mat. Sb. (N.S.), 5 (1939), 317–328

    1939

  119. [126]

    Steinlein, H

    H. Steinlein, H. Walther. Hyperbolic Sets and Shadowing for Noninvertible Maps. Advanced Topics in the Theory of Dynamical Systems, Academic Press, Boston, MA (1989), 219–234

    1989

  120. [128]

    Sullivan.Bounds, Quadratic Differentials, and Renormalization Conjectures.American Mathemat- ical Society Centennial Publications, Vol

    D. Sullivan.Bounds, Quadratic Differentials, and Renormalization Conjectures.American Mathemat- ical Society Centennial Publications, Vol. II: Mathematics into the 21st Century (1988 Centennial Symposium). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1992, pp. 417–466. 47

    1988

  121. [129]

    Tikhomirov.Interiors of sets of vector fields with shadowing corresponding to certain classes of reparameterizations.Vestn

    S. Tikhomirov.Interiors of sets of vector fields with shadowing corresponding to certain classes of reparameterizations.Vestn. St. Petersbg. Univ., Math., 41 (2008), 360-366

    2008

  122. [130]

    Tikhomirov.H¨ older shadowing on finite intervals.Ergodic Theory Dyn

    S. Tikhomirov.H¨ older shadowing on finite intervals.Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst., 35 (2015), 2000-2016

    2015

  123. [131]

    Tikhomirov.An example of a vector field with the oriented shadowing property.J

    S. Tikhomirov.An example of a vector field with the oriented shadowing property.J. Dyn. Control Syst., 21 (2015), 643-654

    2015

  124. [132]

    Tikhomirov.Shadowing in linear skew products.J

    S. Tikhomirov.Shadowing in linear skew products.J. Math. Sci., 209 (2015), 979-987

    2015

  125. [133]

    Todorov.Generalizations of analogs of theorems of Maizel and Pliss and their application in shadowing theory.Discrete Contin

    D. Todorov.Generalizations of analogs of theorems of Maizel and Pliss and their application in shadowing theory.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 33 (2013), 4187-4205

    2013

  126. [134]

    Wen,On theC 1 stability conjecture for flows, J

    L. Wen,On theC 1 stability conjecture for flows, J. Differ. Equations, 129 (1996), 334–357

    1996

  127. [135]

    Wen,Differentiable Dynamical Systems: An Introduction to Structural Stability and Hyperbolicity, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol

    L. Wen,Differentiable Dynamical Systems: An Introduction to Structural Stability and Hyperbolicity, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 173, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2016

    2016

  128. [136]

    Yanchuk, M

    S. Yanchuk, M. Wolfrum, T. Pereira, D. Turaev.Absolute stability and absolute hyperbolicity in systems with discrete time-delays.J. Differ. Equations 318 (2022), 323-343

    2022

  129. [137]

    W. Zeng. Exponential Dichotomies and Transversal Homoclinic Orbits in Degenerate Cases. J. Dyn. Diff. Eq., 7 (1995), 521–548. 48

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.