pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.05831 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-07 · 🌊 nlin.AO · math.DS· nlin.CD· physics.soc-ph

Phase locking and multistability in the topological Kuramoto model on cell complexes

Iva Ba\v{c}i\'c , Michael T. Schaub , J\"urgen Kurths , Dirk Witthaut This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 09:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.AO math.DSnlin.CDphysics.soc-ph
keywords topological Kuramoto modelcell complexesphase lockingmultistabilitywinding numbershigher-order interactionssynchronization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Phase-locked states in the topological Kuramoto model on cell complexes are organized by winding numbers on generalized independent cycles, with multistability arising only when boundaries contain at least five elements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the Kuramoto model to cell complexes to capture higher-order interactions among oscillators of any dimension. It introduces topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions that identify every possible phase-locked configuration by the way oscillator phases wind around independent cycles in the complex. Examples with rings, Platonic solids, and simplices reveal a sharp geometric threshold: any boundary with fewer than five cells supports only a single locked state, while larger boundaries permit multiple stable windings. Independent winding numbers on boundaries of different dimensions then produce cascades of multistable states that propagate across the entire structure. These results tie the collective behavior of the oscillators directly to the topology and boundary structure of the underlying cell complex.

Core claim

The topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions characterize all phase-locked states of the topological Kuramoto model on cell complexes. These states are organized by winding numbers associated with generalized independent cycles. Using rings, Platonic solids, and regular simplices, the authors establish that boundaries must have at least five elements for multistability to arise and that independent winding numbers associated with lower- and higher-dimensional boundaries generate cascades of multistability across dimensions.

What carries the argument

Topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions that express phase-locked states through winding numbers on generalized independent cycles of the cell complex.

If this is right

  • Phase locking on cell complexes is completely determined by the choice of independent cycles and their winding numbers.
  • Multistability appears only when every relevant boundary contains at least five cells.
  • Independent winding numbers on boundaries of successive dimensions produce chained multistable regimes.
  • The framework applies uniformly to simplicial complexes and more general cell complexes.
  • Collective dynamics become predictable from the combinatorial topology alone once the winding numbers are fixed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The five-element threshold may limit multistability in biological or engineered networks whose higher-order cells are small, such as certain neural motifs or communication graphs.
  • The same winding-number construction could be used to design oscillator networks with prescribed numbers of stable synchronization patterns by choosing the cell-complex topology in advance.
  • Extending the model to weighted or directed cell complexes would test whether the multistability cascades survive when the underlying geometry is no longer regular.

Load-bearing premise

The topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions are assumed to exhaustively characterize all phase-locked states without additional dynamical constraints from the embedding or metric of the cell complex.

What would settle it

A numerical simulation or experiment on a cell complex whose boundary has only four elements that nevertheless exhibits multistable phase-locked states not predicted by the winding numbers would falsify the universal rule.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.05831 by Dirk Witthaut, Iva Ba\v{c}i\'c, J\"urgen Kurths, Michael T. Schaub.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Note that whenever there is one stable solution, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Higher-order interactions fundamentally shape collective dynamics in oscillator networks. The topological Kuramoto model captures these effects by extending synchronization models to include interactions between cells of arbitrary dimension within simplicial and cell complexes. We introduce the topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions to characterize all phase-locked states of the topological Kuramoto model. These states are organized by winding numbers associated with generalized independent cycles, which quantify how phases wind around these cycles. Using rings, Platonic solids, and regular simplices as illustrative examples, we uncover a universal rule: boundaries must have at least five elements for multistability to arise. We further find that independent winding numbers associated with lower- and higher-dimensional boundaries generate cascades of multistability across dimensions. These results show how the topology and boundary structure of cell complexes influence phase locking and multistability, and provide a general framework for collective dynamics on cell complexes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to introduce the topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions that characterize all phase-locked states of the topological Kuramoto model on cell complexes. These states are organized by winding numbers associated with generalized independent cycles. Using examples of rings, Platonic solids, and regular simplices, the authors report a universal rule that boundaries must have at least five elements for multistability to arise, and that independent winding numbers on lower- and higher-dimensional boundaries generate cascades of multistability across dimensions.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work is significant for supplying a topology-driven, parameter-free framework that links boundary structure directly to multistability in higher-order oscillator networks. The organization of equilibria by winding numbers on generalized cycles offers a systematic way to classify collective states on simplicial and cell complexes, extending classical Kuramoto theory beyond graphs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction of topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions] The topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions are asserted to exhaustively characterize all phase-locked states. However, the underlying Kuramoto dynamics on a cell complex are generally weighted by edge/face lengths or embedding geometry; the manuscript provides no argument or test showing that these weights do not produce additional equilibria outside the reported winding-number organization. This assumption is load-bearing for the universal multistability rule.
  2. [Examples (rings, Platonic solids, simplices)] All concrete examples (rings, Platonic solids, regular simplices) employ uniform metrics. The claim that boundaries require at least five elements for multistability therefore rests on regular cases; the paper should examine at least one non-uniform or weighted complex to verify whether extra phase-locked states appear that violate the reported cross-dimensional cascades.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could more explicitly separate the model definition from the new Kirchhoff conditions and the multistability rule.
  2. [Notation and definitions] Notation for generalized cycles and associated winding numbers would benefit from an explicit example equation showing their computation on a higher-dimensional boundary.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction of topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions] The topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions are asserted to exhaustively characterize all phase-locked states. However, the underlying Kuramoto dynamics on a cell complex are generally weighted by edge/face lengths or embedding geometry; the manuscript provides no argument or test showing that these weights do not produce additional equilibria outside the reported winding-number organization. This assumption is load-bearing for the universal multistability rule.

    Authors: The topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions follow directly from setting the right-hand side of the topological Kuramoto equations to zero. Because the equations are written in terms of the coboundary operator, the resulting algebraic conditions on the phase differences are satisfied precisely when the net weighted sine contributions around every cycle vanish. The winding numbers label the distinct integer homology classes of these cycles; this labeling is a topological feature and therefore persists for arbitrary positive weights. We acknowledge that the current text does not spell out this generality explicitly nor supply a weighted numerical check. In the revised manuscript we will add a short general argument (in the main text or an appendix) showing that every equilibrium must obey the Kirchhoff conditions and is therefore organized by the winding numbers, together with one explicit numerical example on a weighted ring or simplicial complex confirming that no extraneous equilibria appear. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Examples (rings, Platonic solids, simplices)] All concrete examples (rings, Platonic solids, regular simplices) employ uniform metrics. The claim that boundaries require at least five elements for multistability therefore rests on regular cases; the paper should examine at least one non-uniform or weighted complex to verify whether extra phase-locked states appear that violate the reported cross-dimensional cascades.

    Authors: We agree that the illustrative examples were chosen with uniform metrics for clarity. To test robustness we will insert a new subsection containing a non-uniform example (a ring with heterogeneous edge lengths, or a simplicial complex with perturbed face weights). In this example we will compute the admissible winding-number combinations, locate the corresponding equilibria, and verify that multistability still requires boundaries of size at least five and that the cross-dimensional cascades remain intact. Any minor quantitative shifts will be reported and discussed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation of multistability rule from topological conditions

full rationale

The paper introduces the topological nonlinear Kirchhoff conditions as a characterization of phase-locked states in the topological Kuramoto model on cell complexes, then derives the universal rule that boundaries require at least five elements for multistability along with cascades generated by independent winding numbers on lower- and higher-dimensional boundaries. This follows from direct analysis of the model equations applied to explicit examples including rings, Platonic solids, and regular simplices. No step reduces the claimed results to a fitted parameter, self-citation loop, or input by construction; the findings emerge from the topological structure without presupposing the multistability threshold or cascade behavior.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard definition of cell complexes and the extension of the Kuramoto model to higher-order simplicial interactions; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The topological Kuramoto model on cell complexes is well-defined by extending pairwise phase interactions to arbitrary-dimensional cells.
    Invoked as the starting point for deriving the Kirchhoff conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5702 in / 1153 out tokens · 27498 ms · 2026-05-18T09:29:12.199793+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Parametrize the set of solutions candidates as(16) while taking into account the constraints|ψ[±]| ≤1

    work page

  2. [2]

    Choose a partitionS [n+1] =S • [n+1] ∪S ◦ [n+1] and S[n−1] =S • [n−1] ∪S ◦ [n−1]

    work page

  3. [3]

    Find the solutions of the set of equations(22)where z[±] is a vector of integers

    work page

  4. [4]

    We briefly discuss three important aspects of this al- gorithmic approach to phase locking

    Check the stability from the JacobianJif necessary via Eq.(10). We briefly discuss three important aspects of this al- gorithmic approach to phase locking. First, phase locked states withS ◦ =∅are always linearly stable and as such are especially relevant for applications. States with S◦ ̸=∅are typically, but not always unstable. In fact, we will demonstr...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Hence, the set of solutions candidates (16) is given by ψ[+] =ψ [+] sp ,ψ [−] =ψ [−] sp +K −1

    is spanned by the harmonic vector1. Hence, the set of solutions candidates (16) is given by ψ[+] =ψ [+] sp ,ψ [−] =ψ [−] sp +K −1

    work page

  6. [6]

    1ζ [−].(24) The phase conditions (22) reduce to 1⊤ f [n−1](ψ[−]) = 2πz [−].(25) We start by exploring the fully symmetric case when ω= 0, due to whichψ [+] = 0andψ [−] sp = 0. In Fig. 3 we plot the expression1 ⊤ f [n−1](ψ[−])/(2π)as a func- tion of the parameterζ [−], for each of the partitions S[0] =S •

    work page

  7. [7]

    Since there are six elements that can either be•or◦, we obtain 64 different partitions ofS[0]

    ∪S ◦ [0]. Since there are six elements that can either be•or◦, we obtain 64 different partitions ofS[0]. Due to symmetry, these 64 curves in Fig. 3 are grouped according to the 7 different multiset permutations (i.e. fixed size of both partitions). Phase locked states are found where the curves cross an integer value. All of the partitions, except those w...

    work page

  8. [8]

    = [5,6], withω= (0,0,0,0,+ω 0,−ω 0). We plot the phase conditions (25) divided by2πas a function ofζ[−] 6 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 [ ] 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 1 f0( [ ])/(2 ) 0 = 0.00 0 = 0.50 0 = 1.00 0 = 1.35 0 = 1.70 0 = 1.304 0 = 1.318 0 = 1.329 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.02 1.307 1.311 1.315 1.319 1.323 1.327 0 ...

    work page

  9. [9]

    =∅(solid lines) andS◦

    work page

  10. [10]

    Filled (empty) symbols mark stable (unstable) solutions

    = [5,6](dashed lines) at selected values ofω0 in ω= (0,0,0,0, ω 0,−ω 0). Filled (empty) symbols mark stable (unstable) solutions. The number of intersections with inte- ger values decreases asω0 increases, i.e. phase locked states gradually disappear. The inset highlights a narrow interval of ω0 whereS ◦

    work page

  11. [11]

    = [5,6]crosses zero twice, producing one sta- ble and one unstable solution, whileS◦

    work page

  12. [12]

    Bottom row: Dependence of the corresponding phase- locked states onω0

    =∅does not cross it. Bottom row: Dependence of the corresponding phase- locked states onω0. The stable solutionS◦

    work page

  13. [13]

    =∅(orange line) vanishes nearω 0 ≈1.309, giving rise to the stable solution S◦

    work page

  14. [14]

    Stable and unstable (dashed blue line) solutions ofS◦

    = [5,6](solid blue line). Stable and unstable (dashed blue line) solutions ofS◦

    work page

  15. [15]

    for chosenω0 values in Fig

    = [5,6]annihilate in a saddle-node bifurcation nearω 0 ≈1.327. for chosenω0 values in Fig. 4. As before, we find that the former partitioning always gives rise to stable solutions, while the latter typically yields unstable ones. However, nearthebifurcationpoint, thephase-lockedstateS ◦

    work page

  16. [16]

    Increasing ω0 further, the stableS ◦

    = [5,6]without losing stability. Increasing ω0 further, the stableS ◦

    work page

  17. [17]

    = [5,6]solution annihilates with another unstableS ◦

    work page

  18. [18]

    This scenario is shown in the bottom panel of Fig

    = [5,6]solution in a saddle- node bifurcation. This scenario is shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 4. Finally, letusgeneralizeourresulttopolygonalfacesof arbitrary size. We consider only the all-normal partitions S•

    work page

  19. [19]

    If the ring size iss=N [0] = N[1] ≥3, the number of stable phased-locked solutions 5 10 15 20 25 30 Ring size s 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15Nstable Simulation 1 + 2 s 1 4 FIG

    =S [0] withω= 0. If the ring size iss=N [0] = N[1] ≥3, the number of stable phased-locked solutions 5 10 15 20 25 30 Ring size s 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15Nstable Simulation 1 + 2 s 1 4 FIG. 5.Dependence of the number of stable phase-locked states on ring size.The number of stable solutionsN stable as a function of ring sizesin an all-normal partitioned ring. Sym...

    work page

  20. [20]

    Moreover, we once again setω=0 as our default study case

    =S [0]. Moreover, we once again setω=0 as our default study case. The boundary matrices are given in [53]. Following algorithm 1 we first parametrize the set of solution candidates. We find that the kernels of the boundary operators are one-dimensional and spanned by the vectors1of appropriate dimension. Forω= 0, K[n] = diag(1 N[0])andK [n+1] = diag(1 N[2...

    work page

  21. [21]

    For definiteness, we once again setω= 0and all couplings to unity

    =S [0], for all viablen values for simplexes up to 5 dimensions. For definiteness, we once again setω= 0and all couplings to unity. The explicit form of the boundary operators and the kernel matrices are given in [53]. Our results are summarized in Fig. 8. Note that whenever there is one stable solution, it refers to the trivial solution with winding numb...

    work page

  22. [22]

    Pikovsky, M

    A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths,Synchroniza- tion: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences(Cam- bridge University Press, 2001)

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    Dörfler and F

    F. Dörfler and F. Bullo, Synchronization in complex net- works of phase oscillators: A survey, Automatica50, 1539 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Y. Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, inInternational symposium on mathematical problems in theoretical physics: January 23–29, 1975, kyoto university, kyoto/Japan(Springer,

    work page 1975

  25. [25]

    J. A. Acebrón, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. Pérez Vicente, F. Ri- tort, and R. Spigler, The kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena, Reviews of modern physics77, 137 (2005)

    work page 2005

  26. [26]

    S.H.Strogatz,Fromkuramototocrawford: exploringthe onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscil- lators, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena143, 1 (2000)

    work page 2000

  27. [27]

    F. A. Rodrigues, T. K. D. Peron, P. Ji, and J. Kurths, The kuramoto model in complex networks, Physics Re- ports610, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Manik, M

    D. Manik, M. Timme, and D. Witthaut, Cycle flows and multistability in oscillatory networks, Chaos: An In- terdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science27, 083123 (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Delabays, T

    R. Delabays, T. Coletta, and P. Jacquod, Multistability of phase-locking and topological winding numbers in lo- cally coupled kuramoto models on single-loop networks, Journal of Mathematical Physics57, 032701 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Jafarpour, E

    S. Jafarpour, E. Y. Huang, K. D. Smith, and F. Bullo, Flow and elastic networks on then-torus: Geometry, analysis, and computation, SIAM Review64, 59 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Hellmann, P

    F. Hellmann, P. Schultz, P. Jaros, R. Levchenko, T. Kap- itaniak, J. Kurths, and Y. Maistrenko, Network-induced multistability through lossy coupling and exotic solitary states, Nature communications11, 592 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Breakspear, S

    M. Breakspear, S. Heitmann, and A. Daffertshofer, Gen- erativemodelsofcorticaloscillations: neurobiologicalim- plications of the Kuramoto model, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience4, 190 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    A. E. Sizemore, C. Giusti, A. Kahn, J. M. Vettel, R. F. Betzel, and D. S. Bassett, Cliques and cavities in the human connectome, Journal of Computational Neuro- science44, 115 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Giusti, R

    C. Giusti, R. Ghrist, and D. S. Bassett, Two’s company, three (or more) is a simplex: Algebraic-topological tools for understanding higher-order structure in neural data, Journal of Computational Neuroscience41, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Andjelković, B

    M. Andjelković, B. Tadić, and R. Melnik, The topology of higher-order complexes associated with brain hubs in human connectomes, Scientific Reports10, 17320 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Nixon, E

    M. Nixon, E. Ronen, A. A. Friesem, and N. Davidson, Observing geometric frustration with thousands of cou- pled lasers, Physical Review Letters110, 184102 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Estrada and G

    E. Estrada and G. J. Ross, Centralities in simplicial complexes. applications to protein interaction networks, Journal of Theoretical Biology438, 46 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    A. P. Millán, H. Sun, L. Giambagli, R. Muolo, T. Car- letti, J. J. Torres, F. Radicchi, J. Kurths, and G. Bian- coni, Topology shapes dynamics of higher-order net- works, Nature Physics21, 353 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Battiston, G

    F. Battiston, G. Cencetti, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, M. Lu- cas, A. Patania, J.-G. Young, and G. Petri, Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics, Physics reports874, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Battiston, E

    F. Battiston, E. Amico, A. Barrat, G. Bianconi, G. Fer- raz de Arruda, B. Franceschiello, I. Iacopini, S. Kéfi, V. Latora, Y. Moreno,et al., The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems, Nature Physics17, 1093 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Bianconi,Higher-Order Networks: An Introduction to Simplicial Complexes(Cambridge University Press, 2021)

    G. Bianconi,Higher-Order Networks: An Introduction to Simplicial Complexes(Cambridge University Press, 2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Mulder and G

    D. Mulder and G. Bianconi, Network geometry and com- 12 plexity, Journal of Statistical Physics173, 783 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    C. Bick, T. Gross, H. A. Harrington, and M. T. Schaub, What are higher-order networks?, SIAM Review65, 686 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Iacopini, G

    I. Iacopini, G. Petri, A. Barrat, and V. Latora, Simplicial models of social contagion, Nature Communications10, 2485 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Santoro, F

    A. Santoro, F. Battiston, M. Lucas, G. Petri, and E. Am- ico, Higher-order connectomics of human brain function reveals local topological signatures of task decoding, in- dividual identification, and behavior, Nature Communi- cations15, 10244 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Zhang, M

    Y. Zhang, M. Lucas, and F. Battiston, Higher-order in- teractions shape collective dynamics differently in hy- pergraphs and simplicial complexes, Nature Communi- cations14, 1605 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Horak, S

    D. Horak, S. Maletić, and M. Rajković, Persistent homol- ogy of complex networks, Journal of Statistical Mechan- ics: Theory and Experiment2009, P03034 (2009)

    work page 2009

  48. [48]

    Petri, M

    G. Petri, M. Scolamiero, I. Donato, and F. Vaccarino, Topological strata of weighted complex networks, PLoS One8, e66506 (2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Petri, P

    G. Petri, P. Expert, F. Turkheimer, R. L. Carhart-Harris, D. Nutt, P. J. Hellyer, and F. Vaccarino, Homological scaffolds of brain functional networks, Journal of The Royal Society Interface11, 20140873 (2014)

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    Z. Wu, G. Menichetti, C. Rahmede, and G. Bianconi, Emergent complex network geometry, Scientific Reports 5, 10073 (2015)

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    Andjelković, B

    M. Andjelković, B. Tadić, M. Mitrović Dankulov, M. Ra- jković, and R. Melnik, Topology of innovation spaces in theknowledgenetworksemergingthroughquestions-and- answers, PLOS ONE11, e0154655 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Calmon, S

    L. Calmon, S. Krishnagopal, and G. Biancon, Local dirac synchronization on networks, Chaos33, 033117 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Calmon, J

    L. Calmon, J. G. Restrepo, J. J. Torres, and G. Bian- coni, Dirac synchronization is rhythmic and explosive, Communications Physics5, 253 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Calmon, M

    L. Calmon, M. T. Schauband, and G. Bianconi, Dirac signal processing of higher-order topological signals, New Journal of Physics25, 093013 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    A. P. Millán, J. J. Torres, and G. Bianconi, Explosive higher-orderkuramotodynamicsonsimplicialcomplexes, Physical Review Letters124, 218301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Ghorbanchian, J

    R. Ghorbanchian, J. G. Restrepo, J. J. Torres, and G. Bianconi, Higher-order simplicial synchronization of coupled topological signals, Communications Physics4, 120 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Nurisso, A

    M. Nurisso, A. Arnaudon, M. Lucas, R. L. Peach, P. Ex- pert, F. Vaccarino, and G. Petri, A unified framework for simplicial kuramoto models, Chaos34, 053118 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    P. S. Skardal and A. Arenas, Higher order interactions in complex networks of phase oscillators promote abrupt synchronization switching, Communications Physics3, 218 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Lucas, G

    M. Lucas, G. Cencetti, and F. Battiston, Multiorder laplacian for synchronization in higher-order networks, Physical Review Research2, 033410 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    Carletti, L

    T. Carletti, L. Giambagli, and G. Bianconi, Global topo- logical synchronization on simplicial and cell complexes, Physical review letters130, 187401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    P. S. Skardal and A. Arenas, Abrupt desynchronization and extensive multistability in globally coupled oscillator simplexes, Physical Review Letters122, 248301 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    DeVille, Consensus on simplicial complexes: Re- sults on stability and synchronization, Chaos31, 023137 (2021)

    L. DeVille, Consensus on simplicial complexes: Re- sults on stability and synchronization, Chaos31, 023137 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    L. V. Gambuzza, F. D. Patti, L. Gallo, S. Lepri, M. Ro- mance, R. Criado, M. Frasca, V. Latora, and S. Boc- caletti, Stability of synchronization in simplicial com- plexes, Nature Communications12, 1255 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Parastesh, M

    F. Parastesh, M. Mehrabbeik, K. Rajagopal, S. Jafari, M. Perc, C. I. del Genio, and S. Boccaletti, Synchro- nization stability in simplicial complexes of near-identical systems, Physical Review Research7, 033039 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Hoppe, V

    J. Hoppe, V. P. Grande, and M. T. Schaub, Don’t be afraid of cell complexes! an introduction from an applied perspective, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09726 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    T. M. Roddenberry, M. T. Schaub, and M. Hajij, Sig- nal processing on cell complexes, inIEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)(2022) pp. 8852–8856

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Giambagli, L

    L. Giambagli, L. Calmon, R. Muolo, T. Carletti, and G. Bianconi, Diffusion-driven instability of topological signals coupled by the dirac operator, Physical Review E106, 064314 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Barbarossa and S

    S. Barbarossa and S. Sardellitti, Topological signal pro- cessing over simplicial complexes, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing68, 2992 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [69]

    S. H. Strogatz,Nonlinear dynamics and chaos with stu- dent solutions manual: With applications to physics, bi- ology, chemistry, and engineering(CRC press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    Manik, D

    D. Manik, D. Witthaut, B. Schäfer, M. Matthiae, A. Sorge, M. Rohden, E. Katifori, and M. Timme, Supply networks: Instabilities without overload, The European Physical Journal Special Topics223, 2527 (2014)

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    Hartmann, P

    C. Hartmann, P. C. Böttcher, D. Gross, and D. Wit- thaut, Synchronized states of power grids and oscillator networks by convex optimization, PRX energy3, 043004 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Bačić, C

    I. Bačić, C. Hartmann, P. C. Böttcher, D. Gross, A. Be- nigni, and D. Witthaut, Existence of phase-cohesive solutions of the lossless power-flow equations, TechRxiv Preprint DOI:10.36227/techrxiv.174611978.89382822/ (2025)

    work page doi:10.36227/techrxiv.174611978.89382822/ 2025

  73. [73]

    Symmetry breaking in minimum dissipation networks

    A. Parameswaran, I. Bačić, A. Benigni, and D. Witthaut, Symmetry breaking in minimum dissipation networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24818 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Bačić, Topological kuramoto model on cell complexes, https://github.com/ibfzj/topological-kuramoto/ (2025)

    I. Bačić, Topological kuramoto model on cell complexes, https://github.com/ibfzj/topological-kuramoto/ (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Zhang, G

    M. Zhang, G. S. Wiederhecker, S. Manipatruni, A. Barnard, P. McEuen, and M. Lipson, Synchroniza- tion of micromechanical oscillators using light, Physical Review Letters109, 233906 (2012)

    work page 2012

  76. [76]

    A. E. Motter, S. A. Myers, M. Anghel, and T. Nishikawa, Spontaneous synchrony in power-grid networks, Nature Physics9, 191 (2013)

    work page 2013

  77. [77]

    Olfati-Saber, J

    R. Olfati-Saber, J. A. Fax, and R. M. Murray, Consen- sus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems, Proceedings of the IEEE95, 215 (2007)

    work page 2007