pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.10877 · v1 · pith:CMRH3MPXnew · submitted 2025-10-13 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

USA Tariffs Effect: Machine Learning Insights into the Stock Market

Mridul Patel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords US tariffsAustralian stock marketS&P/ASX 200machine learning regressiontariff impactpredictive accuracystock performance
0
0 comments X

The pith

Machine learning regression models evaluate US tariff impacts on the S&P/ASX 200 index.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies how US tariffs announced and implemented in April 2025 influenced the Australian stock market. It focuses on the S&P/ASX 200 index using data spanning late January to late July 2025. Exploratory data analysis first maps out the fluctuations tied to tariff dates. Machine learning regression models then measure the tariffs' effect on stock performance. A side-by-side comparison checks which models deliver the best accuracy and stability when tracking these market shifts.

Core claim

The paper claims that machine learning-based regression models, applied to stock index data around the tariff announcement and implementation, can evaluate the impact on stock performance and allow a comparative assessment of their predictive accuracy and robustness in capturing tariff-related market responses.

What carries the argument

Machine learning regression models with comparative assessment for predictive accuracy on tariff-period stock data

If this is right

  • Certain regression models will prove more robust than others at quantifying tariff-driven index changes.
  • The approach distinguishes announcement effects from actual implementation effects on the index.
  • Model comparisons identify which techniques best handle short-term market volatility linked to policy shifts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same regression framework could be tested on other national indices to check if tariff response patterns generalize.
  • Adding macroeconomic controls such as interest rates might sharpen the isolation of tariff signals in future runs.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen time window and selected regression models can isolate tariff effects from other market-moving events without major confounding variables or data issues.

What would settle it

Check whether the models' predicted stock movements align closely with actual S&P/ASX 200 changes specifically around the April 2 2025 tariff dates but diverge in non-tariff control periods.

read the original abstract

The imposition of tariffs by President Trump during his second term had far-reaching consequences for global markets, including Australia. This study investigates how both the announcement and subsequent implementation of these tariffs, specifically on 02-Apr-2025, affected the Australian stock market, focusing on the S\&P/ASX 200 index over the period from 21-Jan-2025 to 25-Jul-2025. To accurately capture the significance and behavior of market fluctuations, the exploratory data analysis (EDA) techniques are applied. Furthermore, the impact of tariffs on stock performance is evaluated using machine learning-based regression models. A comparative assessment of these models is conducted to determine their predictive accuracy and robustness in capturing tariff-related market responses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the effects of US tariffs announced and implemented on 02-Apr-2025 on the S&P/ASX 200 index over 21-Jan-2025 to 25-Jul-2025. It applies exploratory data analysis (EDA) followed by machine learning regression models to evaluate impacts on stock performance, with a comparative assessment of the models' predictive accuracy and robustness in capturing tariff-related responses.

Significance. If the central results hold after addressing methodological gaps, the work offers a timely application of ML regression techniques to a specific policy event in financial markets. The focused time window around the tariff date and the comparative model evaluation are constructive elements. However, the current lack of model specifications and controls for confounding events substantially limits the ability to draw robust conclusions about tariff impacts.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methodology] Methodology section: No model specifications, hyperparameters, feature sets (e.g., whether a tariff dummy, lags, or technical indicators are used), performance metrics (RMSE, R², error bars), or data-handling details (train/test split, preprocessing) are provided. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the regressions actually isolate or capture tariff-related responses rather than fitting noise or other market factors.
  2. [Results] Results/Discussion section: The chosen window contains multiple contemporaneous macro events (RBA decisions, global equity moves, commodity shocks). The manuscript does not describe any controls, difference-in-differences design, or additional features to separate tariff effects from confounders. Standard ML regression optimizes predictive fit, not causal attribution; this omission is load-bearing for the claim that the models evaluate the 'impact' of the tariffs.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'machine learning-based regression models' is too vague; listing the specific algorithms considered would improve immediate clarity.
  2. [Introduction] Introduction: Adding citations to prior event-study literature on tariffs or policy announcements in equity markets would better situate the contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed feedback on our manuscript investigating the effects of US tariffs on the S&P/ASX 200 index. We have reviewed the comments carefully and provide point-by-point responses below, indicating the revisions we will implement to improve methodological transparency and address concerns about confounding factors.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methodology] Methodology section: No model specifications, hyperparameters, feature sets (e.g., whether a tariff dummy, lags, or technical indicators are used), performance metrics (RMSE, R², error bars), or data-handling details (train/test split, preprocessing) are provided. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the regressions actually isolate or capture tariff-related responses rather than fitting noise or other market factors.

    Authors: We agree that these details were omitted from the original submission and are necessary for reproducibility and proper evaluation. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the Methodology section to include full model specifications, selected hyperparameters, the complete feature sets (explicitly noting the inclusion of a tariff dummy variable, lags, and technical indicators), performance metrics such as RMSE and R² with error bars, and data-handling procedures including train/test splits and preprocessing steps. These additions will clarify the models' design and their relation to tariff-related market responses. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results/Discussion section: The chosen window contains multiple contemporaneous macro events (RBA decisions, global equity moves, commodity shocks). The manuscript does not describe any controls, difference-in-differences design, or additional features to separate tariff effects from confounders. Standard ML regression optimizes predictive fit, not causal attribution; this omission is load-bearing for the claim that the models evaluate the 'impact' of the tariffs.

    Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this point and the presence of multiple macro events within the study window. Our analysis centers on the predictive performance and robustness of ML regression models in capturing observed market responses around the tariff date, supported by EDA, rather than a formal causal identification strategy. In the revision, we will expand the Results and Discussion sections to explicitly discuss potential confounders and their possible influence on the findings. We will add a dedicated limitations paragraph clarifying that the models assess associations and predictive fit rather than causal impacts. Where data permit, we will incorporate additional control features to better contextualize the results. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; standard ML regression on market data

full rationale

The paper applies exploratory data analysis followed by machine learning regression models to assess tariff impacts on S&P/ASX 200 returns over the stated window, then compares model accuracies. No equations, derivations, or self-citations appear in the provided abstract or description that reduce any reported prediction or impact measure to fitted parameters on the same data by construction. The methodology relies on external market observations and standard regression techniques without self-definitional loops, uniqueness theorems imported from prior work, or renaming of known results as novel unification. The central claims therefore remain independent of the inputs rather than forced by them.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5639 in / 1164 out tokens · 25285 ms · 2026-05-21T20:56:32.077350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    HTTP Mailbox - Asynchronous RESTful Communication

    Altman NS (1992) An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. The American Statistician 46(3):175–185, DOI 10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879 1992

  2. [2]

    In: Handbook of Economic Forecasting, vol 1, Elsevier, pp 777–878, DOI 10.1016/S1574-0706(05) 01015-3

    Andersen TG, Bollerslev T, Diebold FX (2006) Volatility and correlation forecasting. In: Handbook of Economic Forecasting, vol 1, Elsevier, pp 777–878, DOI 10.1016/S1574-0706(05) 01015-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s1574-0706(05 2006

  3. [3]

    URL https://www2.asx.com.au, accessed: July 2025

    ASX Limited (2025) S&p/asx 200 historical data. URL https://www2.asx.com.au, accessed: July 2025

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Journal of Big Data 10(1):9

    Ayitey Junior M, Appiahene P, Appiah O, Bombie CN (2023) Forex market forecasting using machine learning: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Big Data 10(1):9

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    (2024) Comparative analysis of deep learning models for stock price prediction in the indian market

    Barua M, Kumar T, Raj K, et al. (2024) Comparative analysis of deep learning models for stock price prediction in the indian market. FinTech 3(4):551–568

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Neural Information Process- ing—Letters and Reviews 11(10):203–224

    Basak D, Pal S, Patranabis DC (2007) Support vector regression. Neural Information Process- ing—Letters and Reviews 11(10):203–224

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Journal of Econo- metrics 31(3):307–327, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1

    Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econo- metrics 31(3):307–327, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1 1986

  8. [8]

    Some pac-bayesian theorems,

    Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1):5–32, DOI 10.1023/A: 1010933404324

    work page doi:10.1023/a: 2001

  9. [9]

    Cambridge University Press, DOI 10.1017/9781108524872

    Brooks C (2019) Introductory Econometrics for Finance, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, DOI 10.1017/9781108524872

    work page doi:10.1017/9781108524872 2019

  10. [10]

    Expert Systems with Applications 156:113464, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113464

    Bustos O, Pomares-Quimbaya A (2020) Stock market movement forecast: A systematic review. Expert Systems with Applications 156:113464, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113464

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113464 2020

  11. [11]

    IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 13(1):21–27, DOI 10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964

    Cover TM, Hart PE (1967) Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 13(1):21–27, DOI 10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964

    work page doi:10.1109/tit.1967.1053964 1967

  12. [12]

    Draper N, Smith H (1998) Applied Regression Analysis. Wiley

    work page 1998

  13. [13]

    Econometrica 50(4):987–1007, DOI 10.2307/1912773

    Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of united kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50(4):987–1007, DOI 10.2307/1912773

    work page doi:10.2307/1912773 1982

  14. [14]

    The Review of Financial Studies 33(5):2223–2273, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhaa009

    Gu S, Kelly B, Xiu D (2020) Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. The Review of Financial Studies 33(5):2223–2273, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhaa009

    work page doi:10.1093/rfs/hhaa009 2020

  15. [15]

    Hansen PR, Lunde A (2005) A forecast comparison of volatility models: Does anything beat a garch(1,1)? Journal of Applied Econometrics 20(7):873–889, DOI 10.1002/jae.800

    work page doi:10.1002/jae.800 2005

  16. [16]

    Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 59(6):1767–1781

    Hu Y, Guo H, Huang W, Xu Y (2023) Yield forecasting by machine learning algorithm: Evidence from china’s a-share market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 59(6):1767–1781

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    OTexts, URL https: //otexts.com/fpp3/

    Hyndman R, Athanasopoulos G (2018) Forecasting: Principles and Practice. OTexts, URL https: //otexts.com/fpp3/

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 698:405–414, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-8633-5 42

    Kumar K, Haider MT (2021) Blended computation of machine learning with the recurrent neural network for intra-day stock market movement prediction using a multi-level classifier. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 698:405–414, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-8633-5 42

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8633-5 2021

  19. [19]

    R News 2(3):18–22

    Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomforest. R News 2(3):18–22

    work page 2002

  20. [20]

    Procedia Computer Science 191:123–130, DOI 10

    Mehta A, Pandya S, Kotecha K (2021) Integrating sentiment analysis with deep learning models to enhance stock market prediction accuracy. Procedia Computer Science 191:123–130, DOI 10. 1016/j.procs.2021.07.015

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    John Wiley & Sons

    Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2012) Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. John Wiley & Sons

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Entropy 22(8):840

    Nabipour M, Nayyeri P, Jabani H, Mosavi A, Salwana E, S S (2020) Deep learning for stock market prediction. Entropy 22(8):840

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Noble WS (2006) What is a support vector machine? Nature Biotechnology 24(12):1565–1567

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    Artificial Intelligence Review 53(4):3007–3057, DOI 10

    Nti IK, Adekoya AF, Weyori BA (2020) A systematic review of fundamental and technical analysis of stock market predictions. Artificial Intelligence Review 53(4):3007–3057, DOI 10. 1007/s10462-019-09754-z 13

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Students’ Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS), IEEE, pp 1–7

    Somkunwar R, Rao J, Varvante N (2024) Stock value prediction accuracy enhancement using cnn and multiple linear regression for nifty. In: 2024 IEEE International Students’ Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS), IEEE, pp 1–7

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    International Journal of Financial Studies 11(3):94

    Sonkavde G, Dharrao DS, Bongale AM, Deokate ST, Doreswamy D, Bhat SK (2023) Forecasting stock market prices using machine learning and deep learning models: A systematic review, performance analysis and discussion of implications. International Journal of Financial Studies 11(3):94

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    URL https://www.spglobal

    S&P Dow Jones Indices (2025) S&p 500 historical market data. URL https://www.spglobal. com/spdji/en/indices/equity/sp-500/, accessed: July 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Wiley, DOI 10.1002/9780470644553

    Tsay RS (2010) Analysis of Financial Time Series, 3rd edn. Wiley, DOI 10.1002/9780470644553

    work page doi:10.1002/9780470644553 2010

  29. [29]

    Springer, DOI 10.1007/ 978-1-4757-2440-0

    Vapnik VN (1995) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, DOI 10.1007/ 978-1-4757-2440-0

    work page 1995

  30. [30]

    In: The AI Revolution: Driving Business Innovation and Research: Volume 2, Springer Nature Switzerland, pp 219–232

    Velmurugan R, Abey J, Nomran N (2024) Forecasting stock market prices through real- time stock data utilizing deep learning techniques. In: The AI Revolution: Driving Business Innovation and Research: Volume 2, Springer Nature Switzerland, pp 219–232

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Procedia Computer Science 167:599–606, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.326

    Vijh M, Chandola D, Tikkiwal VA, Kumar A (2020) Stock closing price prediction using machine learning techniques. Procedia Computer Science 167:599–606, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.326

    work page doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.326 2020

  32. [32]

    Willmott C (1985) Advantages of the mean absolute error (mae) over the root mean square error (rmse) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research 30:79–82 6 Appendix Table 1: Australian Stock Market Data Date Open High Low Close Date Open High Low Close 25-07-25 8,674.9 8,683.8 8,658.2 8,666.9 28-04-25 7,973.6 8,051.8 7,970.5 7,997.1 24-07-25 ...

    work page 1985