pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.13126 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-15 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · physics.app-ph

Compact Continuous Cold Atomic Beam from a Single Cell with 3D Cooling and Ultra-low Light Shift

Sheng-Zhe Wang , Qian-Lan Cai , Zhi-Xin Meng , Yi-Cheng Deng , Yan-Ying Feng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 06:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph physics.app-ph
keywords cold atomic beamoptical molassesmagneto-optical trapRaman-Ramsey interferometrylight shiftcontinuous atomic sourceatomic clocks
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single vacuum cell produces a continuous beam of cold atoms cooled in three dimensions while keeping light-induced frequency shifts below 1 Hz.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes a compact atomic source that merges a two-dimensional magneto-optical trap with an off-axis moving optical molasses inside one 50 mm region to create a steady cold-atom beam. Custom in-vacuum mirrors and a narrow output aperture allow the beam to exit while minimizing unwanted light. The beam reaches high flux with low temperatures in all directions and a velocity that can be adjusted between 5 and 20 m/s. Continuous Raman-Ramsey interferometry over 100 mm separation confirms the light shift remains as small as -0.51 Hz with high fringe contrast. Such a source would simplify the design of portable atomic clocks and interferometers by removing the need for separate chambers and reducing aliasing noise.

Core claim

By integrating an off-axis moving optical molasses with a two-dimensional magneto-optical trap in a single 50 mm interaction region using custom in-vacuum mirrors and a 0.8 mm output aperture, the source achieves simultaneous 3D cooling of a continuous atomic beam with flux up to 4.9(5)×10^9 atoms/s, transverse temperature 94(5) μK, longitudinal temperature down to 231(65) μK, mean velocity tunable from 5 to 20 m/s, and a verified light shift of only -0.51(4) Hz with 90.85(30)% fringe contrast in Raman-Ramsey interferometry at 100 mm separation.

What carries the argument

Reflective geometry for off-axis optical molasses beams realized through custom in-vacuum mirrors and a small output aperture that suppresses stray light and fluorescence leakage.

If this is right

  • Atomic beam devices can operate continuously from one compact cell instead of requiring separate source and cooling regions.
  • Interferometers using this beam experience reduced aliasing noise and longer effective interrogation times due to the low decoherence.
  • Portable clocks and sensors gain tunable beam velocity and three-dimensional cooling without added system complexity.
  • Field applications achieve higher accuracy because the light shift remains below 1 Hz during continuous operation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mirror-and-aperture approach could be scaled to other laser-cooled beam experiments to shrink overall vacuum volume while preserving low background light.
  • Pairing this source with existing compact interferometer designs might extend coherence times enough to improve mobile clock stability by a measurable factor.
  • Varying the atomic species or operating at higher mean velocities would test whether the ultra-low light shift holds across different experimental parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The custom in-vacuum mirrors and 0.8 mm output aperture successfully suppress stray light and fluorescence leakage enough to achieve the reported ultra-low light shift.

What would settle it

Repeating the continuous Raman-Ramsey interferometry at a doubled separation of 200 mm and checking whether the measured light shift stays near -0.5 Hz or rises substantially from residual scattered light.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.13126 by Qian-Lan Cai, Sheng-Zhe Wang, Yan-Ying Feng, Yi-Cheng Deng, Zhi-Xin Meng.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Simulated longitudinal temperature of a 2D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Principles of (a) a classical MOT-based single-cell [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (b) shows the simulated dependence of leaked op￾tical power and decoherence rate on da. Reducing da suppresses both quantities. A 0.8 mm aperture isolates most stray light and fluorescence, limiting the decoher￾ence rate to 5.34 s−1 while maintaining a low transverse temperature of 62.8 µK and a flux of 6.1 × 109 atoms/s at a mean velocity of 11.5 m/s and a cooling length of lc = 50 mm. In the meantime, th… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Apparatus schematic. (a) Vacuum cell containing the 2D MOT and the off-axis moving OM. Directions of the laser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Longitudinal velocity distribution measured over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Mean atom velocity as a function of the moving [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Continuous spatial-domain Raman–Ramsey inter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Raman transition spectrum at a Rabi phase of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Continuous Raman–Ramsey fringe contrast as functions of (a) atomic flux, (b) MOT power, (c) probe power, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. (a) Central portion of the Raman–Ramsey fringe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report a compact single-cell source of a continuous cold-atom beam with three-dimensional (3D) cooling. By integrating an off-axis moving optical molasses (OM) with a two-dimensional magneto-optical trap (MOT), we achieve simultaneous 3D cooling within a 50 mm interaction region. The source delivers a continuous flux up to 4.9(5)x10^9 atoms/s, with a transverse temperature of 94(5) microK, a longitudinal temperature as low as 231(65) microK, and a tunable mean velocity between 5 and 20 m/s. Custom in-vacuum mirrors integrate the reflective geometry for the off-axis OM beams with a 0.8 mm output aperture, ensuring stable alignment while suppressing stray light and fluorescence leakage. Ultra-low light shift and decoherence are verified via continuous Raman-Ramsey interferometry, yielding a light shift of -0.51(4)Hz and a typical fringe contrast of 90.85(30)% at a Raman separation of 100 mm (interrogation time of 8.70 ms). This compact continuous cold-atom beam source constitutes a practical building block for atomic-beam clocks and interferometers, enabling reduced aliasing noise together with improved sensitivity and accuracy for field applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the experimental realization of a compact single-cell continuous cold atomic beam source achieving 3D cooling via integration of an off-axis moving optical molasses with a 2D MOT in a 50 mm interaction region. It claims a maximum flux of 4.9(5)×10^9 atoms/s, transverse temperature of 94(5) μK, longitudinal temperature as low as 231(65) μK, tunable mean velocity 5–20 m/s, and ultra-low light shift of −0.51(4) Hz with 90.85(30)% fringe contrast, verified by continuous Raman-Ramsey interferometry at 100 mm separation (8.70 ms interrogation time). Custom in-vacuum mirrors and a 0.8 mm output aperture are stated to enable stable alignment while suppressing stray light and fluorescence leakage. The source is presented as a practical building block for atomic-beam clocks and interferometers to reduce aliasing noise and improve sensitivity/accuracy in field applications.

Significance. If the performance metrics hold, this represents a useful engineering advance in compact continuous cold-atom sources. The reported high flux, low 3D temperatures, velocity tunability, and especially the low light shift with high contrast in a continuous Raman-Ramsey setup at 100 mm could directly benefit portable atomic clocks and interferometers by mitigating aliasing and improving accuracy. The single-cell reflective geometry with integrated suppression is a notable practical feature. Quantitative results with uncertainties indicate systematic experimental characterization.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results (Raman-Ramsey interferometry)] Results section on Raman-Ramsey interferometry and light-shift measurement: The central claim of an ultra-low light shift of −0.51(4) Hz (with 90.85(30)% contrast) is attributed to stray-light/fluorescence suppression by the custom in-vacuum mirrors and 0.8 mm output aperture. However, no control data—such as residual photon rates with/without the aperture, background fluorescence measurements, or light-shift values versus aperture size—are provided to establish that the observed shift arises from the design rather than residual light at the interrogation zone. This is load-bearing for the 'ultra-low light shift' advantage claimed for clocks and interferometers.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The flux is written as '4.9(5)x10^9'; adopt consistent scientific notation '4.9(5) × 10^9' for improved readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the light-shift results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Results section on Raman-Ramsey interferometry and light-shift measurement: The central claim of an ultra-low light shift of −0.51(4) Hz (with 90.85(30)% contrast) is attributed to stray-light/fluorescence suppression by the custom in-vacuum mirrors and 0.8 mm output aperture. However, no control data—such as residual photon rates with/without the aperture, background fluorescence measurements, or light-shift values versus aperture size—are provided to establish that the observed shift arises from the design rather than residual light at the interrogation zone. This is load-bearing for the 'ultra-low light shift' advantage claimed for clocks and interferometers.

    Authors: We agree that explicit control measurements would further substantiate the link between the observed light shift and the stray-light suppression provided by the in-vacuum mirrors and 0.8 mm aperture. In the revised manuscript we add (i) measured background fluorescence levels at the interrogation zone with the aperture in place, (ii) an estimate of residual photon scattering rate derived from the known fluorescence yield, solid angle subtended by the aperture, and mirror reflectivity, and (iii) a simple model showing that the measured shift of −0.51(4) Hz is consistent with the expected residual intensity after suppression. We also note that the 90.85(30)% fringe contrast at 8.70 ms interrogation time itself constitutes direct evidence of low decoherence from stray light. Light-shift data versus aperture size are not available because the aperture is an integral part of the fixed mirror assembly; performing such a scan would require a new apparatus. The primary verification of the ultra-low shift therefore remains the Raman-Ramsey measurement itself. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Experimental light-shift values as a function of aperture size cannot be provided without constructing a new apparatus with a variable aperture.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental apparatus and measurement report

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental report on building and characterizing a single-cell continuous cold-atom beam source. Reported quantities (flux of 4.9(5)×10^9 atoms/s, temperatures, tunable velocity, light shift of -0.51(4) Hz, and fringe contrast) are obtained from direct measurements using the described hardware and Raman-Ramsey interferometry. No derivation chain, predictive equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps appear; the design choices (in-vacuum mirrors, 0.8 mm aperture) are presented as engineering solutions whose performance is validated by the measurements themselves rather than by any closed logical loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; performance metrics are reported as direct experimental outcomes using standard laser-cooling methods.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5780 in / 1228 out tokens · 40144 ms · 2026-05-18T06:58:46.695941+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Devenoges, A

    L. Devenoges, A. Stefanov, A. Joyet, P. Thomann, and G. D. Domenico, Improvement of the frequency stability below the Dick limit with a continuous atomic fountain clock, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr.59, 211 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Y. Feng, H. Xue, X. Wang, S. Chen, and Z. Zhou, Obser- vation of Ramsey fringes using stimulated Raman transi- tions in a laser-cooled continuous rubidium atomic beam, Appl. Phys. B118, 139 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    J. D. Elgin, T. P. Heavner, J. Kitching, E. A. Donley, J. Denney, and E. A. Salim, A cold-atom beam clock based on coherent population trapping, Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 033503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    H. Xue, Y. Feng, S. Chen, X. Wang, X. Yan, Z. Jiang, and Z. Zhou, A continuous cold atomic beam interferometer, J. Appl. Phys.117, 094901 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    J. M. Kwolek and A. T. Black, Continuous Sub-Doppler- Cooled Atomic Beam Interferometer for Inertial Sensing, Phys. Rev. Appl.17, 024061 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Meng, P.-Q

    Z.-X. Meng, P.-Q. Yan, S.-Z. Wang, X.-J. Li, H.-B. Xue, and Y.-Y. Feng, Closed-loop Dual-atom-interferometer Inertial Sensor with Continuous Cold Atomic Beams, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 034050 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Schmiedmayer, R

    J. Schmiedmayer, R. Folman, and T. Calarco, Quantum information processing with neutral atoms on an atom chip, J. Mod. Opt.49, 1375 (2002)

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    R. E. Behringer, V. Natarajan, and G. Timp, Laser fo- cused atomic deposition: A new lithography tool, Appl. Phys. Lett.68, 1034 (1996)

    work page 1996

  9. [9]

    C.-C. Chen, R. Gonz´ alez Escudero, J. Min´ aˇ r, B. Pasquiou, S. Bennetts, and F. Schreck, Contin- uous Bose-Einstein condensation, Nature606, 683 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Domenico, G

    G. Domenico, G. Mileti, and P. Thomann, Pump-probe spectroscopy and velocimetry of cold atoms in a slow beam, Phys. Rev. A64, 043408 (2001)

    work page 2001

  11. [11]

    G. J. Dick, inProceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Pre- cise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Applications and Planning Meeting(Naval Observatory, Redondo Beach, CA, 1987) p.16

    work page 1987

  12. [12]

    W. D. Phillips and H. Metcalf, Laser Deceleration of an Atomic Beam, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 596 (1982)

    work page 1982

  13. [13]

    Ertmer, R

    W. Ertmer, R. Blatt, J. L. Hall, and M. Zhu, Laser Ma- nipulation of Atomic Beam Velocities: Demonstration of Stopped Atoms and Velocity Reversal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 996 (1985)

    work page 1985

  14. [14]

    M. Zhu, C. W. Oates, and J. L. Hall, Continuous High- Flux Monovelocity Atomic Beam Based on a Broadband Laser-Cooling Technique, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 46 (1991)

    work page 1991

  15. [15]

    Ketterle, A

    W. Ketterle, A. Martin, M. A. Joffe, and D. E. Pritchard, Slowing and Cooling Atoms in Isotropic Laser Light, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2483 (1992)

    work page 1992

  16. [16]

    T. L. Gustavson, P. Bouyer, and M. A. Kasevich, Preci- sion Rotation Measurements with an Atom Interferome- ter Gyroscope, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2046 (1997)

    work page 2046

  17. [17]

    Yan, W.-C

    P.-Q. Yan, W.-C. Jia, S.-Z. Wang, and Y.-Y. Feng, A continuous dual-axis atomic interferometric inertial sen- sor (2023), arXiv:2311.16557

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    T. Sato, N. Nishimura, N. Kaku, S. Otabe, T. Kawasaki, T. Hosoya, and M. Kozuma, Closed-Loop Measurements in an Atom-Interferometer Gyroscope with Compen- sation for Velocity-Dependent Phase Dispersion, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 044001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Z. T. Lu, K. L. Corwin, M. J. Renn, M. H. Anderson, E. A. Cornell, and C. E. Wieman, Low-Velocity Intense Source of Atoms from a Magneto-Optical Trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3331 (1996)

    work page 1996

  20. [20]

    Wang and W

    H. Wang and W. F. Buell, Velocity-tunable 9 magneto-optical-trap-based cold Cs atomic beam, J.Opt.Soc.Am.B20, 2025 (2003)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Wang, Y.-Y

    X.-J. Wang, Y.-Y. Feng, H.-B. Xue, Z.-Y. Zhou, and W.- D. Zhang, A cold 87 Rb atomic beam, Chin. Phys. B20, 126701 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    Schoser, A

    J. Schoser, A. Bat¨ ar, R. L¨ ow, V. Schweikhard, A. Grabowski, Yu. B. Ovchinnikov, and T. Pfau, Intense source of cold Rb atoms from a pure two-dimensional magneto-optical trap, Phys. Rev. A66, 023410 (2002)

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    J. R. Kellogg, D. Schlippert, J. M. Kohel, R. J. Thomp- son, D. C. Aveline, and N. Yu, A compact high-efficiency cold atom beam source, Appl. Phys. B109, 61 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Dieckmann, R

    K. Dieckmann, R. J. C. Spreeuw, M. Weidem¨ uller, and J. T. M. Walraven, Two-dimensional magneto-optical trap as a source of slow atoms, Phys. Rev. A58, 3891 (1998)

    work page 1998

  25. [25]

    J. J. Arlt, O. Marag` o, S. Webster, S. Hopkins, and C. J. Foot, A pyramidal magneto-optical trap as a source of slow atoms, Opt. Commun.157, 303 (1998)

    work page 1998

  26. [26]

    Camposeo, A

    A. Camposeo, A. Piombini, F. Cervelli, F. Tantussi, F. Fuso, and E. Arimondo, A cold cesium atomic beam produced out of a pyramidal funnel, Opt. Commun.200, 231 (2001)

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    J. M. Kohel, J. Ramirez-Serrano, R. J. Thompson, L. Maleki, J. L. Bliss, and K. G. Libbrecht, Gener- ation of an intense cold-atom beam from a pyrami- dal magneto-optical trap: Experiment and simulation, J.Opt.Soc.Am.B20, 1161 (2003)

    work page 2003

  28. [28]

    W. Xie, Q. Wang, X. He, S. Fang, Z. Yuan, X. Qi, and X. Chen, A cold cesium beam source based on a two- dimensional magneto-optical trap, AIP Advances12, 075124 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    S. J. Park, J. Noh, and J. Mun, Cold atomic beam from a two-dimensional magneto-optical trap with two-color pushing laser beams, Opt. Commun.285, 3950 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    S. Wang, Z. Meng, P. Yan, Y. Liu, and Y. Feng, Contin- uous cold rubidium atomic beam with enhanced flux and tunable velocity, Opt. Express32, 9116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Weyers, E

    S. Weyers, E. Aucouturier, C. Valentin, and N. Dimarcq, A continuous beam of cold cesium atoms extracted from a two-dimensional magneto-optical trap, Opt. Commun. 143, 30 (1997)

    work page 1997

  32. [32]

    Berthoud, A

    P. Berthoud, A. Joyet, G. Dudle, N. Sagna, and P. Thomann, A continuous beam of slow, cold cesium atoms magnetically extracted from a 2D magneto-optical trap, Europhys. Lett. (EPL)41, 141 (1998)

    work page 1998

  33. [33]

    Berthoud, E

    P. Berthoud, E. Fretel, and P. Thomann, Bright, slow, and continuous beam of laser-cooled cesium atoms, Phys. Rev. A60, R4241 (1999)

    work page 1999

  34. [34]

    Dutta, D

    I. Dutta, D. Savoie, B. Fang, B. Venon, C. L. Gar- rido Alzar, R. Geiger, and A. Landragin, Continuous Cold-Atom Inertial Sensor with 1 nrad/sec Rotation Sta- bility, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 183003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Savoie, M

    D. Savoie, M. Altorio, B. Fang, L. A. Sidorenkov, R. Geiger, and A. Landragin, Interleaved atom inter- ferometry for high-sensitivity inertial measurements, Sci. Adv.4, eaau7948 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Huang, X.-S

    J.-Q. Huang, X.-S. Yan, , C.-F. Wu, J.-W. Zhang, and W. Li-Jun, Intense source of cold cesium atoms based on a two-dimensional magneto–optical trap with inde- pendent axial cooling and pushing, Chin. Phys. B25, 063701 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    G. D. Domenico, L. Devenoges, A. Joyet, A. Stefanov, and P. Thomann, Uncertainty evaluation of the continu- ous cesium fountain frequency standard FOCS-2, in2011 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control and the European Frequency and Time Forum (FCS) Proceedings(2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    J. M. Kwolek, C. T. Fancher, M. Bashkansky, and A. T. Black, Three-Dimensional Cooling of an Atom-Beam Source for High-Contrast Atom Interferometry, Phys. Rev. Appl.13, 044057 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    A. T. Black, J. M. Kwolek, C. T. Fancher, and M. Bashkansky, Decoherence and Dynamics in Con- tinuous 3D-Cooled Atom Interferometry, in Proc. SPIE 11296, Optical, OptoAtomic, and Entanglement- Enhanced Precision Metrology II, 1129607 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    F. A. Narducci, A. T. Black, and J. H. Burke, Ad- vances toward fieldable atom interferometers, Advances in Physics: X7, 1946426 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    P. D. Lett, W. D. Phillips, S. L. Rolston, C. E. Tanner, R. N. Watts, and C. I. Westbrook, Optical molasses, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B.6, 2084 (1989)

    work page 2084

  42. [42]

    Kasevich, D

    M. Kasevich, D. S. Weiss, E. Riis, K. Moler, S. Kasapi, and S. Chu, Atomic Velocity Selection Using Stimulated Raman Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 2297 (1991)

    work page 1991

  43. [43]

    Moler, D

    K. Moler, D. S. Weiss, M. Kasevich, and S. Chu, The- oretical analysis of velocity-selective Raman transitions, Phys. Rev. A45, 342 (1992)

    work page 1992

  44. [44]

    G. S. Pati, F. K. Fatemi, M. Bashkansky, and S. M. Shahriar, Optical Ramsey Interference and Its Perfor- mance in D1 Line Excitation in Rubidium Vapor for Im- plementation of a Vapor Cell Clock, in Proc. SPIE 7949, Advances in Slow and Fast Light IV, 794910 (2011)

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    X. Wu, Z. Pagel, B. S. Malek, T. H. Nguyen, F. Zi, D. S. Scheirer, and H. M¨ uller, Gravity surveys using a mobile atom interferometer, Sci. Adv.5, eaax0800 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Abdel Hafiz, R

    M. Abdel Hafiz, R. Vicarini, N. Passilly, C. E. Calosso, V. Maurice, J. Pollock, A. Taichenachev, V. Yudin, J. Kitching, and R. Boudot, Protocol for Light-Shift Compensation in a Continuous-Wave Microcell Atomic Clock, Phys. Rev. Appl.14, 034015 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Tricot, D

    F. Tricot, D. H. Phung, M. Lours, S. Gu´ erandel, and E. de Clercq, Power stabilization of a diode laser with an acousto-optic modulator, Rev. Sci. Instrum.89, 113112 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    S. E. Hamann, D. L. Haycock, G. Klose, P. H. Pax, I. H. Deutsch, and P. S. Jessen, Resolved-Sideband Ra- man Cooling to the Ground State of an Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 4149 (1998)

    work page 1998

  49. [49]

    Mashimo, M

    T. Mashimo, M. Abe, and S. Tojo, Effective trapping of cold atoms using dipole and radiative forces in an optical trap, Phys. Rev. A100, 063426 (2019)

    work page 2019