pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.13146 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-15 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Scalable Generalized Meta-Spanners Enabling Parallel Multitasking Optical Manipulation

Tianyue Li , Wenyu Gao , Boyan Fu , Tianhua Shao , Yuchao Fu , Siarhei Zavatski , Jeeban Kumar Nayak , Shaohui Yan
show 7 more authors
Xiaohao Xu Shuming Wang Baoli Yao Zhenlin Wang Shining Zhu Olivier J. F. Martin C. T. Chan
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 06:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords metasurfacesoptical manipulationmeta-spannerscomplex-amplitude modulationparallel multitaskingparticle dynamicsreconfigurable opticsoptical tweezers
0
0 comments X

The pith

Metasurface-based generalized meta-spanners generate lens-free customizable optical fields for parallel multitasking optical manipulation by suppressing diffractive losses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces generalized optical meta-spanners using metasurfaces to sculpt light for contactless particle control. By modulating both amplitude and phase of light, it produces stable optical fields that allow multiple manipulation tasks at once, like varying the force along the beam path and creating arrays of spanners in a plane. This approach avoids the need for additional lenses and reduces losses from diffraction that plague traditional methods using donut-shaped light beams. The system allows reconfiguration by changing light polarization, enabling robust control over many particles simultaneously. This advances optical manipulation toward compact devices for applications like moving cells or delivering drugs.

Core claim

Relying on complex-amplitude modulation, this platform generates lens-free, customizable optical fields that suppress diffractive losses. As a result, several advanced functionalities are simultaneously achieved, including longitudinally varying manipulation and in-plane spanner arrays, which outperforms the same operations realized by conventional donut-shaped orbital flows. The particle dynamics is reconfigurable simply by switching the input and output polarizations, facilitating robust multi-channel control.

What carries the argument

Generalized optical meta-spanners (GOMSs) realized on metasurfaces through complex-amplitude modulation to produce customizable, lens-free optical fields for particle trapping.

If this is right

  • Longitudinally varying manipulation and in-plane spanner arrays can be achieved simultaneously.
  • These operations outperform the same tasks performed with conventional donut-shaped orbital flows.
  • Particle dynamics can be reconfigured by switching input and output polarizations for multi-channel control.
  • Both single-particle dynamics and parallel manipulation of particle ensembles show exceptional stability.
  • The ultracompact platform scales to a much larger number of optical spanners.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integration into microfluidic chips could enable automated high-throughput cell handling without bulky external optics.
  • Polarization-based reconfiguration may support adaptive manipulation in changing biological samples.
  • Larger arrays could enable new experiments in cell-level biomechanics by controlling many particles independently.
  • The approach might combine with other metasurface functions to create hybrid devices for sensing and manipulation.

Load-bearing premise

The metasurface can be designed and fabricated to realize the required complex-amplitude modulation that simultaneously suppresses diffractive losses and produces stable, reconfigurable particle dynamics across multiple channels without additional lenses or post-processing corrections.

What would settle it

If fabricated metasurfaces exhibit high diffractive losses or fail to produce stable, reconfigurable particle trajectories in lens-free setups, the central performance claims would not hold.

read the original abstract

Optical manipulation techniques offer exceptional contactless control but are fundamentally limited in their ability to perform parallel multitasking. To achieve high-density, versatile manipulation with subwavelength photonic devices, it is essential to sculpt light fields in multiple dimensions. Here, we overcome this challenge by introducing generalized optical meta-spanners (GOMSs) based on metasurfaces. Relying on complex-amplitude modulation, this platform generates lens-free, customizable optical fields that suppress diffractive losses. As a result, several advanced functionalities are simultaneously achieved, including longitudinally varying manipulation and in-plane spanner arrays, which outperforms the same operations realized by conventional donut-shaped orbital flows. Furthermore, the particle dynamics is reconfigurable simply by switching the input and output polarizations, facilitating robust multi-channel control. We experimentally validate the proposed approach by demonstrating single-particle dynamics and the parallel manipulation of particle ensembles, revealing exceptional stability for multitasking operations. These results demonstrate an ultracompact platform scalable to a much larger number of optical spanners, advancing metadevices from wavefront sculptors to particle manipulators. We envision that the GOMS will catalyze innovations in cross-disciplinary fields such as targeted drug delivery and cell-level biomechanics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces generalized optical meta-spanners (GOMSs) realized with metasurfaces that employ complex-amplitude modulation to generate lens-free, customizable optical fields. These fields are claimed to suppress diffractive losses while enabling multiple advanced functionalities simultaneously, including longitudinally varying particle manipulation, in-plane spanner arrays, and polarization-reconfigurable multi-channel control. The platform is asserted to outperform conventional donut-shaped orbital flows, with experimental demonstrations of single-particle dynamics and parallel manipulation of particle ensembles showing exceptional stability, positioning the device as a scalable ultracompact platform for optical manipulation.

Significance. If the experimental claims hold with quantitative support, this work would advance metasurface-based optical tweezers from wavefront sculpting to practical particle manipulators, offering an ultracompact, lens-free route to high-density parallel multitasking. The polarization-reconfigurability and claimed loss suppression could enable new applications in targeted drug delivery and cell biomechanics. The manuscript provides experimental validation of multi-particle operations, which is a positive step toward scalable metadevices.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Experimental Results] Abstract and Experimental Results section: The central claim that complex-amplitude modulation 'suppresses diffractive losses' and enables stable multi-channel dynamics 'without additional lenses or post-processing corrections' is load-bearing for the outperformance assertion, yet the provided description lacks quantitative metrics such as measured power throughput, trap stiffness values with error bars, or direct side-by-side comparisons against conventional donut-shaped beams.
  2. [Design and Methods] Design and Methods section: The assumption that metasurface unit cells achieve independent, high-efficiency amplitude and phase control with low crosstalk across channels must be supported by explicit efficiency spectra or crosstalk measurements at the operating wavelength; metasurface literature indicates that true complex-amplitude modulation often involves trade-offs that can reintroduce diffraction or reduce stability, and these must be quantified to substantiate the lens-free suppression claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract uses the term 'generalized optical meta-spanners (GOMSs)' without a concise definition of what 'generalized' adds beyond standard meta-spanners; a brief clarification in the introduction would improve readability.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the experimental particle trajectories should include scale bars, time stamps, and explicit statements of input/output polarization states to allow readers to assess the reconfigurability claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects that require additional quantitative support to strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment point by point below and have incorporated revisions to provide the requested metrics and characterizations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Experimental Results] Abstract and Experimental Results section: The central claim that complex-amplitude modulation 'suppresses diffractive losses' and enables stable multi-channel dynamics 'without additional lenses or post-processing corrections' is load-bearing for the outperformance assertion, yet the provided description lacks quantitative metrics such as measured power throughput, trap stiffness values with error bars, or direct side-by-side comparisons against conventional donut-shaped beams.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative metrics are necessary to rigorously support the claims of diffractive loss suppression and outperformance relative to conventional donut-shaped orbital flows. In the revised manuscript, we have added measured power throughput values, trap stiffness data with error bars for both the GOMS platform and conventional beams, and a direct side-by-side comparison in the Experimental Results section and Supplementary Information. These additions substantiate the stability and multitasking advantages while preserving the lens-free operation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Design and Methods] Design and Methods section: The assumption that metasurface unit cells achieve independent, high-efficiency amplitude and phase control with low crosstalk across channels must be supported by explicit efficiency spectra or crosstalk measurements at the operating wavelength; metasurface literature indicates that true complex-amplitude modulation often involves trade-offs that can reintroduce diffraction or reduce stability, and these must be quantified to substantiate the lens-free suppression claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need to quantify the metasurface unit cell performance to address potential trade-offs in complex-amplitude modulation. The revised Design and Methods section now includes explicit efficiency spectra and crosstalk measurements at the operating wavelength, obtained through both full-wave simulations and experimental characterization. These data confirm independent amplitude and phase control with low crosstalk, thereby supporting the lens-free suppression of diffractive losses and overall device stability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on metasurface design and experimental validation of field sculpting

full rationale

The paper introduces generalized optical meta-spanners via metasurface-based complex-amplitude modulation to generate lens-free fields. Functionalities such as longitudinally varying manipulation and polarization-reconfigurable multi-channel control are presented as outcomes of this design, validated through single-particle and ensemble experiments showing stability. No derivation reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, no self-citation forms a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in; the central results derive from independent device physics and measured particle trajectories rather than re-expressing the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the domain assumption that metasurfaces can deliver complex-amplitude control sufficient to suppress diffractive losses while maintaining stable particle trajectories; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Metasurfaces can achieve complex-amplitude modulation that suppresses diffractive losses for lens-free optical fields
    Invoked when describing the platform that generates customizable fields outperforming conventional donut-shaped flows.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5797 in / 1218 out tokens · 32963 ms · 2026-05-18T06:57:20.849886+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    National Laboratory of Solid -State Microstructures, School of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China

    work page

  2. [2]

    Department of Physics, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China

    work page

  3. [3]

    State Key Laboratory of Ultrafast Optical Science and Technology, Xi’an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710119, China

    work page

  4. [4]

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    work page

  5. [5]

    Nanophotonics and Metrology Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland

    work page

  6. [6]

    †These authors are contributed equally: T

    Institute for Advanced Study, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China. †These authors are contributed equally: T. Li, W. Gao, B. Fu *Correspondence: xuxiaohao@opt.ac.cn; wangshuming@nju.edu.cn; yaobl@opt.ac.cn; phchan@ust.hk 2 Abstract Optical manipulation techniques offer exceptional contactless control but are fu...

    work page

  7. [7]

    When the beam is emitted along the optical axis , the cylindrical coordinates 6 in k-space can be approximated as (∆𝑘, 𝜃′, 𝑘𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃𝑡) ≈ (∆𝑘, 𝜃′, 𝑘)

    The modulated intensity 𝐼0 ′ in k-space and the original intensity 𝐼0 in real space are related by the conservation of optical power 𝐼0 ′∆𝑘𝑑(∆𝑘)𝑑𝜃′ = 𝐼0𝑟𝑑𝑟𝑑𝜃 in ray-optics approximation. When the beam is emitted along the optical axis , the cylindrical coordinates 6 in k-space can be approximated as (∆𝑘, 𝜃′, 𝑘𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃𝑡) ≈ (∆𝑘, 𝜃′, 𝑘). Consequently, for any cl...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Here, the phase difference δ governs the polarization state of both the incident and transmitted beams (see Supporting Information Note 1 for a full derivation)

    𝑒𝑖2𝜃 cos ( 𝛿 2) ]. Here, the phase difference δ governs the polarization state of both the incident and transmitted beams (see Supporting Information Note 1 for a full derivation). To implement three independent GOV channels simultaneously, we decompose the overall Jones matrix as 𝐽 = 𝐽̃1 + 𝐽̃2 , where 𝐽̃1(𝑥𝑖, 𝑦𝑖, 𝜃𝑖) and 𝐽̃2(𝑥𝑗, 𝑦𝑗, 𝜃𝑗) correspond to two...

    work page 2048

  9. [9]

    Trapping of Atoms by Resonance Radiation Pressure

    Ashkin A. Trapping of Atoms by Resonance Radiation Pressure. Physical Review Letters 1978; 40: 729-732

    work page 1978

  10. [10]

    Ashkin, J

    A. Ashkin, J. M. Dziedzic, J. E. Bjorkholm, et al. Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Optics Letters 1986; 11: 288-290

    work page 1986

  11. [11]

    Roadmap for optical tweezers

    V olpe G, Maragò OM, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H, et al. Roadmap for optical tweezers. Journal of Physics: Photonics 2023; 5: 022501

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Classical Electrodynamics (1962)

    Jackson JD. Classical Electrodynamics (1962)

    work page 1962

  13. [13]

    Focused plasmonic trapping of metallic particles

    Min C, Shen Z, Shen J, et al. Focused plasmonic trapping of metallic particles. Nature Communications 2013; 4: 2891

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Optical tweeze-sectioning microscopy for 3D imagingand manipulation of suspended cells

    Li X, Dan D, Zavatski S , et al. Optical tweeze-sectioning microscopy for 3D imagingand manipulation of suspended cells. Science Advances 2025; 11: eadx3900

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Optical pulling at macroscopic distances

    Li X, Chen J, Lin Z, et al. Optical pulling at macroscopic distances. Science Advances 2019; 5: eaau7814

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Optical pulling forces and their applications

    Li H, Cao Y , Zhou L-M, et al. Optical pulling forces and their applications. Advances in Optics and Photonics 2020; 12: 288-366

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Ultra-long-range optical pulling with an optical nanofibre

    Zhang J, Liu K, Wang P, et al. Ultra-long-range optical pulling with an optical nanofibre. Nature Communications 2025; 16: 7424

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Non-Hermitian non-equipartition theory for trapped particles

    Li X, Cao Y , Ng J. Non-Hermitian non-equipartition theory for trapped particles. Nature Communications 2024; 15: 1963

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Creating stable trapping force and switchable optical torque with tunable phase of light

    Nan F, Li X, Zhang S, et al. Creating stable trapping force and switchable optical torque with tunable phase of light. Science Advances 2022; 8: eadd6664

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Persistent and responsive collective motion with adaptive time delay

    Chen Z, Zheng Y . Persistent and responsive collective motion with adaptive time delay. Science Advances 2024; 10: eadk3914

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Opto-thermophoretic assembly of colloidal matter

    Lin L, Zhang J, Peng X, et al. Opto-thermophoretic assembly of colloidal matter. Science Advances 2017; 3: e1700458

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Nobel Lecture: Laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms

    Phillips WD. Nobel Lecture: Laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms. Reviews of Modern Physics 1998; 70: 721- 741

    work page 1998

  23. [23]

    Three-dimensional viscous confinement and cooling of atoms by resonance radiation pressure

    Chu S, Hollberg L, Bjorkholm JE , et al. Three-dimensional viscous confinement and cooling of atoms by resonance radiation pressure. Physical Review Letters 1985; 55: 48-51

    work page 1985

  24. [24]

    Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre- Gaussian laser modes

    Allen L, Beijersbergen MW, Spreeuw RJ, et al. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre- Gaussian laser modes. Physical Review A 1992; 45: 8185-8189

    work page 1992

  25. [25]

    Optical tweezers and spanners

    Miles Padgett, Allen L. Optical tweezers and spanners. Physics world 1997; 10: 35

    work page 1997

  26. [26]

    Tweezers with a twist

    Padgett M, Bowman R. Tweezers with a twist. Nature Photonics 2011; 5: 343-348

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Time-varying 3D optical torque via a single beam

    Wu YJ, Zhuang JH, Yu PP, et al. Time-varying 3D optical torque via a single beam. Nature Communications 2025; 16: 593

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Scattering forces from the curl of the spin angular momentum of a light field

    Ruffner DB, Grier DG. Comment on "Scattering forces from the curl of the spin angular momentum of a light field". Physical Review Letters 2013; 111: 059301

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Scattering forces from the curl of the spin angular momentum of a light field

    Albaladejo S, Marques MI, Laroche M, et al. Scattering forces from the curl of the spin angular momentum of a light field. Physical Review Letters 2009; 102: 113602

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    Optical forces arising from phase gradients

    Roichman Y , Sun B, Roichman Y, et al. Optical forces arising from phase gradients. Physical Review Letters 2008; 100: 013602

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    Theory of Optical Trapping by an Optical V ortex Beam

    Ng J, Lin Z, Chan CT. Theory of Optical Trapping by an Optical V ortex Beam. Physical Review Letters 2010; 104: 103601

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    Unidirectional chiral scattering from single enantiomeric plasmonic nanoparticles

    Xie Y , Krasavin A V , Roth DJ, et al. Unidirectional chiral scattering from single enantiomeric plasmonic nanoparticles. Nature Communications 2025; 16: 1125

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Spin–orbit interactions of light

    Bliokh KY , Rodríguez-Fortuño FJ, Nori F, et al. Spin–orbit interactions of light. Nature Photonics 2015; 9: 796-808. 24

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Multidimensional phase singularities in nanophotonics

    Ni J, Huang C, Zhou LM, et al. Multidimensional phase singularities in nanophotonics. Science 2021; 374: eabj0039

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Observation of high-order imaginary Poynting momentum optomechanics in structured light

    Zhou Y , Xu X, Zhang Y, et al. Observation of high-order imaginary Poynting momentum optomechanics in structured light. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2022; 119: e2209721119

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Torsion pendulum driven by the angular momentum of light: Beth’s legacy continues

    Brasselet E. Torsion pendulum driven by the angular momentum of light: Beth’s legacy continues. Advanced Photonics 2023; 5: 034003

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Ultrasensitive torque detection with an optically levitated nanorotor

    Ahn J, Xu Z, Bang J, et al. Ultrasensitive torque detection with an optically levitated nanorotor. Nature Nanotechnology 2020; 15: 89-93

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Levitodynamics: Levitation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum

    Gonzalez -Ballestero C, Aspelmeyer M, Novotny L , et al. Levitodynamics: Levitation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum. Science 2021; 374: eabg3027

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Photo-actuation of liquids for light-driven microfluidics: state of the art and perspectives

    Baigl D. Photo-actuation of liquids for light-driven microfluidics: state of the art and perspectives. Lab Chip 2012; 12: 3637-3653

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    Helical-wavefront laser beams produced with a spiral phaseplate

    Beijersbergen MW, Coerwinkel RPC, Kristensen M , et al. Helical-wavefront laser beams produced with a spiral phaseplate. Optics Communications 1994; 112: 321-327

    work page 1994

  41. [41]

    Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media

    Marrucci L, Manzo C, Paparo D. Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media. Physical Review Letters 2006; 96: 163905

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities

    Shen Y , Wang X, Xie Z, et al. Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities. Light: Science & Applications 2019; 8: 90

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Highly efficient vortex generation at the nanoscale

    Chen Q, Qu G, Yin J, et al. Highly efficient vortex generation at the nanoscale. Nature Nanotechnology 2024; 19: 1000- 1006

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Arbitrary spin-to–orbital angular momentum conversion of light

    Devlin RC, Ambrosio A, Rubin NA , et al. Arbitrary spin-to–orbital angular momentum conversion of light. Science 2017; 358: 896–901

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Generation and Conversion Dynamics of Dual Bessel Beams with a Photonic Spin-Dependent Dielectric Metasurface

    Li T, Li X, Yan S, et al. Generation and Conversion Dynamics of Dual Bessel Beams with a Photonic Spin-Dependent Dielectric Metasurface. Physical Review Applied 2021; 15: 014059

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Structuring total angular momentum of light along the propagation direction with polarization-controlled meta-optics

    Dorrah AH, Rubin NA, Tamagnone M , et al. Structuring total angular momentum of light along the propagation direction with polarization-controlled meta-optics. Nature Communications 2021; 12: 6249

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Rotatum of light

    Dorrah AH, Palmieri A, Li L, et al. Rotatum of light. Science Advances 2025; 11: eadr9092

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Longitudinal field controls vector vortex beams in anisotropic epsilon -near-zero metamaterials

    Aita V , Roth DJ, Zaleska A, et al. Longitudinal field controls vector vortex beams in anisotropic epsilon -near-zero metamaterials. Nature Communications 2025; 16: 3807

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Longitudinally variable 3D optical polarization structures

    Li Y , Ansari MA, Ahmed H, et al. Longitudinally variable 3D optical polarization structures. Science Advances 2023; 9: eadj6675

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Spin‐Selective Trifunctional Metasurfaces for Deforming Versatile Nondiffractive Beams along the Optical Trajectory

    Li T, Chen Y , Fu B, et al. Spin‐Selective Trifunctional Metasurfaces for Deforming Versatile Nondiffractive Beams along the Optical Trajectory. Laser & Photonics Reviews 2024; 18: 2301372

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Roadmap for Optical Metasurfaces

    Kuznetsov AI, Brongersma ML, Yao J, et al. Roadmap for Optical Metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 2024; 11: 816-865

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    All-dielectric silicon metalens for two-dimensional particle manipulation in optical tweezers

    Chantakit T, Schlickriede C, Sain B, et al. All-dielectric silicon metalens for two-dimensional particle manipulation in optical tweezers. Photonics Research 2020; 8: 1435-1440

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    Integrating the optical tweezers and spanner onto an individual single -layer metasurface

    Li T, Xu X, Fu B , et al. Integrating the optical tweezers and spanner onto an individual single -layer metasurface. Photonics Research 2021; 9: 1062-1068

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    A spatial-frequency patching metasurface enabling super -capacity perfect vector vortex beams

    Yu Z, Gao X, Yao J , et al. A spatial-frequency patching metasurface enabling super -capacity perfect vector vortex beams. eLight 2024; 4: 21

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Shaping caustics into propagation-invariant light

    Zannotti A, Denz C, Alonso MA, et al. Shaping caustics into propagation-invariant light. Nature Communications 2020; 11: 3597

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Multiplexed Generation of Generalized V ortex Beams with On‐Demand Intensity Profiles Based on Metasurfaces

    Zhang X, Huang L, Zhao R , et al. Multiplexed Generation of Generalized V ortex Beams with On‐Demand Intensity Profiles Based on Metasurfaces. Laser & Photonics Reviews 2021; 16: 2100451

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Basis function approach for diffractive pattern generation with Dammann vortex 25 metasurfaces

    Zhang X, Huang L, Zhao R , et al. Basis function approach for diffractive pattern generation with Dammann vortex 25 metasurfaces. Science Advances 2022; 8: eabp8073

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Arbitrary engineering of spatial caustics with 3D -printed metasurfaces

    Zhou X, Wang H, Liu S , et al. Arbitrary engineering of spatial caustics with 3D -printed metasurfaces. Nature Communications 2024; 15: 3719

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Teich MC. Fundamentals of Photonics (1991)

    work page 1991

  60. [60]

    Flat optics with designer metasurfaces

    Yu N, Capasso F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nature Materials 2014; 13: 139-150

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Miniaturized high-efficiency snapshot polarimetric stereoscopic imaging

    Fu B, Zhou X, Li T, et al. Miniaturized high-efficiency snapshot polarimetric stereoscopic imaging. Optica 2025; 12: 391-398

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Chip-scale metaphotonic singularities: topological, dynamical, and practical aspects

    Li T, Liu M, Hou J , et al. Chip-scale metaphotonic singularities: topological, dynamical, and practical aspects. Chip 2024; 3: 100109

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Metasurface‐Integrated Pattern‐Preserved Fiber Mode Separator

    Xu H, Li T, Gao G , et al. Metasurface‐Integrated Pattern‐Preserved Fiber Mode Separator. Advanced Functional Materials 2025: 2505081

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Ultrahigh numerical aperture meta-fibre for flexible optical trapping

    Plidschun M, Ren H, Kim J, et al. Ultrahigh numerical aperture meta-fibre for flexible optical trapping. Light: Science & Applications 2021; 10: 57

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    A topological fluctuation theorem

    Mahault B, Tang E, Golestanian R. A topological fluctuation theorem. Nature Communications 2022; 13: 3036

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Photonic metamaterial analogue of a continuous time crystal

    Liu T, Ou J -Y , MacDonald KF, et al. Photonic metamaterial analogue of a continuous time crystal. Nature Physics 2023; 19: 986-991

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Synchronization of optically self - assembled nanorotors

    Cui X, Mylnikov V , Johansson P, et al. Synchronization of optically self - assembled nanorotors. Science Advances 2024; 10: eadn3485

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Multiple-spot parallel processing for laser micronanofabrication

    Kato J-i, Takeyasu N, Adachi Y, et al. Multiple-spot parallel processing for laser micronanofabrication. Applied Physics Letters 2005; 86: 044102

    work page 2005