pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.14195 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-16 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.plasm-ph

Flying focus with arbitrary directionality for spatiotemporal control of laser pulses

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 06:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.plasm-ph
keywords flying focuslaser pulsediffractive opticsspatiotemporal controlholographic encodingplasma opticschirped pulsearbitrary focal trajectory
0
0 comments X

The pith

A chirped laser pulse diffracted by a lens and grating creates a focal point that moves both along and across the beam path.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to make the focal point of a laser pulse travel in directions not limited to the beam's forward motion. By using a diffractive lens combined with a grating on a chirped pulse, the direction and speed of the focus can be adjusted through the lens focal length, grating period, and chirp amount. This matters for applications that need the intense light spot to follow specific paths in space and time, such as accelerating particles or generating radiation in new ways. Simulations confirm the approach works in a holographic setup using plasma for high-power use.

Core claim

A chirped laser pulse focused and diffracted by a diffractive lens and grating creates a focal point that can move both along and transverse to the propagation direction, with direction and velocity controlled by focal length, grating period, and chirp. This is demonstrated in simulations for a holographic configuration in gas or plasma using two off-axis pump beams.

What carries the argument

The diffractive lens and grating that together encode a chromatic phase pattern on the chirped pulse to produce arbitrary focal trajectories.

If this is right

  • Control over focal motion in two dimensions enables new setups for laser wakefield acceleration of ions.
  • Nonlinear Thomson scattering can occur with the focus moving transversely to the propagation direction.
  • Surface-plasmon emission of THz radiation becomes possible with tailored focal paths.
  • Tunable velocity and direction support optimized interactions in high-power laser experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining this with additional optical elements could allow fully three-dimensional control over the focal trajectory.
  • Low-power tests with solid-state optics could validate the concept before high-power plasma implementations.
  • This approach might extend to other wave phenomena where phase control is used to steer focal points.

Load-bearing premise

The phase pattern imprinted by the diffractive lens and grating is not distorted when encoded holographically by two off-axis pump beams in a gas or plasma.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the actual path of the laser focus in the plasma holographic setup does not match the trajectory predicted by the ideal diffractive lens and grating calculation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.14195 by Devdigvijay Singh, John P. Palastro, Lavonne S. Mack, Matthew R. Edwards, Sida Cao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of a flying focus with arbitrary directionality. (a) A chirped pulse propagates through a chromatic lens and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Design space for an arbitrary-directionality flying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Focal location relative to the central wavelength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. PIC simulation of a two-dimensional flying focus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Flying focus techniques produce laser pulses whose focal points travel at arbitrary, controllable velocities. While this flexibility can enhance a broad range of laser-based applications, existing techniques constrain the motion of the focal point to the propagation direction of the pulse. Here, we introduce a flying focus configuration that decouples the motion of the focus from the propagation direction. A chirped laser pulse focused and diffracted by a diffractive lens and grating creates a focal point that can move both along and transverse to the propagation direction. The focal length of the lens, grating period, and chirp can be tuned to control the direction and velocity of the focus. Simulations demonstrate this control for a holographic configuration suited to high-power pulses, in which two off-axis pump beams with different focal lengths encode the equivalent phase of a chromatic lens and grating in a gas or plasma. For low-power pulses, conventional solid-state or adaptive optics can be used instead. Multi-dimensional control over the focal trajectory enables new configurations for applications, including laser wakefield acceleration of ions, nonlinear Thomson scattering, and surface-plasmon emission of THz radiation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a flying focus technique that decouples focal-point motion from the laser propagation direction. A chirped pulse is focused and diffracted by a diffractive lens plus grating; the focal length, grating period, and chirp are tuned to set arbitrary direction and velocity of the focus. Simulations are presented for a holographic realization in which two off-axis pump beams encode the combined quadratic-plus-linear phase in a gas or plasma, enabling high-power operation; conventional optics are suggested for low-power cases. The work claims this multi-dimensional control opens new configurations for laser wakefield acceleration of ions, nonlinear Thomson scattering, and THz surface-plasmon emission.

Significance. If the result holds, the ability to prescribe arbitrary focal trajectories (including transverse components) would meaningfully extend existing flying-focus methods and enable previously inaccessible spatiotemporal laser-plasma configurations. The holographic encoding approach for high-power pulses is a practical contribution, provided the phase imprint remains faithful.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulations section] Simulations section (and associated figures): the manuscript states that simulations demonstrate control for the holographic configuration, yet provides no indication that the plasma response was modeled with ionization, Kerr nonlinearity, or pump depletion. These effects would render the effective focal length and grating period position-dependent, directly undermining the linear mapping from chirp to focal velocity and direction that supports the central claim of arbitrary trajectory control.
  2. [Results and discussion] Results and discussion: no quantitative error bars, RMS deviation from the ideal diffractive trajectory, or comparison against analytic limits are reported for the simulated focal paths. Without these metrics it is not possible to judge how faithfully the holographic implementation reproduces the claimed directionality and velocity control.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would be clearer if it explicitly stated the range of velocities and angles demonstrated in the simulations.
  2. Notation for the chirp parameter and grating period should be defined once in the main text and used consistently in all figures and equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments, which have helped us clarify key aspects of the simulations and strengthen the quantitative presentation of the results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Simulations section] Simulations section (and associated figures): the manuscript states that simulations demonstrate control for the holographic configuration, yet provides no indication that the plasma response was modeled with ionization, Kerr nonlinearity, or pump depletion. These effects would render the effective focal length and grating period position-dependent, directly undermining the linear mapping from chirp to focal velocity and direction that supports the central claim of arbitrary trajectory control.

    Authors: We agree that ionization, Kerr nonlinearity, and pump depletion are important for a complete high-power plasma simulation and could introduce position dependence in the effective focal length and grating period. The simulations in the manuscript model the linear propagation of the chirped pulse under the assumption that the combined quadratic-plus-linear phase is faithfully imprinted by the two off-axis pump beams. This assumption holds in the regime where the probe intensity remains below the threshold for significant nonlinear plasma response during the short interaction time. We have revised the Simulations section to explicitly state this modeling assumption and added a brief discussion of the validity conditions (e.g., low probe intensity relative to the pump). A full nonlinear plasma simulation lies beyond the present scope but is noted as future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results and discussion] Results and discussion: no quantitative error bars, RMS deviation from the ideal diffractive trajectory, or comparison against analytic limits are reported for the simulated focal paths. Without these metrics it is not possible to judge how faithfully the holographic implementation reproduces the claimed directionality and velocity control.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. In the revised manuscript we have added error bars to the extracted focal trajectories that reflect numerical grid resolution and fitting uncertainty. We now also report the RMS deviation of each simulated path from the ideal analytic trajectory (derived from the input focal length, grating period, and chirp) and include a direct overlay comparison in the figures. These quantitative metrics confirm that the holographic implementation reproduces the expected direction and velocity to within a few percent under the stated assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies standard diffraction to new geometry

full rationale

The paper derives focal trajectory control from conventional wave optics: quadratic phase of a diffractive lens plus linear phase of a grating, applied to a chirped pulse, using standard dispersion and diffraction relations. No equations reduce by construction to fitted inputs or self-definitions. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work are required for the central claim. Simulations are invoked only to illustrate the ideal case; the mathematical mapping from lens focal length, grating period, and chirp to direction/velocity remains independent and externally verifiable via Fourier optics. This is the expected non-finding for a paper whose core result is a geometric reconfiguration of known principles.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The configuration rests on standard paraxial diffraction and linear dispersion; the holographic realization assumes that two pump beams can imprint the required phase without introducing uncontrolled nonlinearities or density perturbations.

free parameters (3)
  • focal length of diffractive lens
    Chosen to set the longitudinal velocity component; appears as a tunable design parameter rather than a fitted constant.
  • grating period
    Sets the transverse velocity component; selected by the experimenter.
  • chirp parameter
    Controls the temporal spread of frequencies and therefore the speed along the chosen trajectory.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The diffractive lens and grating produce a purely linear phase ramp in the transverse direction and a quadratic phase in the longitudinal direction with no higher-order aberrations.
    Invoked when the focal trajectory is stated to be exactly controllable by the three parameters.
  • domain assumption The holographic pump beams write an equivalent phase pattern into the plasma without significant self-phase modulation or hydrodynamic evolution during the pulse.
    Required for the high-power version described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5737 in / 1510 out tokens · 29177 ms · 2026-05-18T06:53:56.508117+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1 −50 0 50 t [fs] λ/λ 0 Z, Y [µm] Z Y 0 200 400

    9 1 1. 1 −50 0 50 t [fs] λ/λ 0 Z, Y [µm] Z Y 0 200 400

  2. [2]

    98 1 t [fs] λ/λ 0 I/I max (a) (b) (c) FIG. 4. PIC simulation of a two-dimensional flying focus produced by focusing and diffracting a chirped laser pulse with a combined plasma zone plate and grating. (a) The pulse intensity at three different times, corresponding to the moments at which light at different wavelengths reach focus, showing that the focal s...

  3. [3]

    L. A. Hall and A. F. Abouraddy, Free-space group- velocity dispersion induced in space-time wave packets by v-shaped spectra, Phys. Rev. A104, 013505 (2021)

  4. [4]

    Yessenov, L

    M. Yessenov, L. A. Hall, K. L. Schepler, and A. F. Abouraddy, Space-time wave packets, Adv. Opt. Pho- tonics14, 455 (2022)

  5. [5]

    Zhan, Spatiotemporal sculpturing of light: a tutorial, Adv

    Q. Zhan, Spatiotemporal sculpturing of light: a tutorial, Adv. Opt. Photonics16, 163 (2024)

  6. [6]

    Piccardo, M

    M. Piccardo, M. O. Cernaianu, J. P. Palastro, A. Arefiev, C. Thaury, J. Vieira, D. H. Froula, and V. Malka, Trends in relativistic laser–matter interaction: the promises of structured light, Optica12, 732 (2025)

  7. [7]

    H. E. Kondakci and A. F. Abouraddy, Optical space- time wave packets having arbitrary group velocities in free space, Nat. Commun.10, 929 (2019)

  8. [8]

    Li and J

    Z. Li and J. Kawanaka, Velocity and acceleration freely tunable straight-line propagation light bullet, Sci. Rep. 10, 11481 (2020)

  9. [9]

    Yessenov, B

    M. Yessenov, B. Bhaduri, P. J. Delfyett, and A. F. Abouraddy, Free-space optical delay line using space- time wave packets, Nat. Commun.11, 5782 (2020)

  10. [10]

    Li and J

    Z. Li and J. Kawanaka, Optical wave-packet with nearly- programmable group velocities, Commun. Phys.3, 211 (2020)

  11. [11]

    Yessenov and A

    M. Yessenov and A. F. Abouraddy, Accelerating and de- celerating space-time optical wave packets in free space, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 233901 (2020)

  12. [12]

    L. A. Hall, M. Yessenov, and A. F. Abouraddy, Arbitrar- ily accelerating space-time wave packets, Opt. Lett.47, 694 (2022)

  13. [13]

    Z. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Leng, and R. Li, Investigat- ing group-velocity-tunable propagation-invariant optical wave-packets, Sci. Rep.12, 16102 (2022)

  14. [14]

    X. Su, K. Zou, H. Zhou, H. Song, Y. Wang, R. Zeng, Z. Jiang, Y. Duan, M. Karpov, T. J. Kippenberg,et al., Temporally and longitudinally tailored dynamic space- time wave packets, Opt. Express32, 26653 (2024)

  15. [15]

    X. Su, K. Zou, Y. Wang, M. Yessenov, H. Zhou, H. Song, W. Ko, R. Zeng, A. Alhaddad, M. Ramakrishnan,et al., Space-time wave packets in multimode optical fibers with controlled dynamic motions and tunable group velocities, Nat. Commun.16, 2027 (2025)

  16. [16]

    A. M. Shaltout, K. G. Lagoudakis, J. van de Groep, S. J. Kim, J. Vučković, V. M. Shalaev, and M. L. Brongersma, Spatiotemporal light control with frequency-gradient metasurfaces, Science365, 374 (2019)

  17. [17]

    Piccardo, M

    M. Piccardo, M. de Oliveira, A. Toma, V. Aglieri, A. Forbes, and A. Ambrosio, Vortex laser arrays with topologicalchargecontrolandself-healingofdefects,Nat. Photonics16, 359 (2022)

  18. [18]

    Piccardo, M

    M. Piccardo, M. de Oliveira, V. R. Policht, M. Russo, B. Ardini, M. Corti, G. Valentini, J. Vieira, C. Man- zoni, G. Cerullo,et al., Broadband control of topological– spectral correlations in space–time beams, Nat. Photon- ics17, 822 (2023)

  19. [19]

    Franco, Ó

    E. Franco, Ó. Martínez-Matos, and J. A. Rodrigo, Curve- shaped ultrashort laser pulses with programmable spa- tiotemporal behavior, Optica10, 379 (2023)

  20. [20]

    Y. Shen, H. Wang, and S. Fan, Free-space topological optical textures: tutorial, Adv. Opt. Photonics17, 295 (2025)

  21. [21]

    Vettenburg, H

    T. Vettenburg, H. I. Dalgarno, J. Nylk, C. Coll-Lladó, D. E. Ferrier, T. Čižmár, F. J. Gunn-Moore, and K. Dho- lakia, Light-sheet microscopy using an Airy beam, Nat. Methods11, 541 (2014)

  22. [22]

    Piksarv, D

    P. Piksarv, D. Marti, T. Le, A. Unterhuber, L. H. Forbes, M. R. Andrews, A. Stingl, W. Drexler, P. E. Andersen, and K. Dholakia, Integrated single-and two-photon light sheet microscopy using accelerating beams, Sci. Rep.7, 1435 (2017)

  23. [23]

    S. Wang, X. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Simultaneous Airy beam generation for both surface plasmon polaritons and transmittedwavebasedonmetasurface,Opt.Express25, 23589 (2017)

  24. [24]

    Bor and B

    Z. Bor and B. Racz, Group velocity dispersion in prisms and its application to pulse compression and travelling- wave excitation, Opt. Commun.54, 165 (1985). 8

  25. [25]

    Hebling, G

    J. Hebling, G. Almasi, I. Z. Kozma, and J. Kuhl, Velocity matching by pulse front tilting for large-area THz-pulse generation, Opt. Express10, 1161 (2002)

  26. [26]

    P. S. Nugraha, G. Krizsán, C. Lombosi, L. Pálfalvi, G. Tóth, G. Almási, J. A. Fülöp, and J. Hebling, Demon- strationofatilted-pulse-frontpumpedplane-parallelslab terahertz source, Opt. Lett.44, 1023 (2019)

  27. [27]

    L. Wang, G. Tóth, J. Hebling, and F. Kärtner, Tilted- pulse-front schemes for terahertz generation, Laser Pho- tonics Rev.14, 2000021 (2020)

  28. [28]

    Q. Cao, P. Zheng, and Q. Zhan, Vectorial sculpturing of spatiotemporal wavepackets, APL Photonics7(2022)

  29. [29]

    Vincenti and F

    H. Vincenti and F. Quéré, Attosecond lighthouses: how to use spatiotemporally coupled light fields to generate isolated attosecond pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 113904 (2012)

  30. [30]

    Sainte-Marie, O

    A. Sainte-Marie, O. Gobert, and F. Quere, Controlling the velocity of ultrashort light pulses in vacuum through spatio-temporal couplings, Optica4, 1298 (2017)

  31. [31]

    D. H. Froula, D. Turnbull, A. S. Davies, T. J. Kessler, D. Haberberger, J. P. Palastro, S.-W. Bahk, I. A. Begi- shev, R. Boni, S. Bucht,et al., Spatiotemporal control of laser intensity, Nat. Photonics12, 262 (2018)

  32. [32]

    Franke, D

    P. Franke, D. Turnbull, J. Katz, J. P. Palastro, I. A. Begishev, J. Bromage, J. L. Shaw, R. Boni, and D. H. Froula, Measurement and control of large diameter ion- ization waves of arbitrary velocity, Opt. Express27, 31978 (2019)

  33. [33]

    S. W. Jolly, O. Gobert, A. Jeandet, and F. Quéré, Con- trolling the velocity of a femtosecond laser pulse using refractive lenses, Opt. Express28, 4888 (2020)

  34. [34]

    Caizergues, S

    C. Caizergues, S. Smartsev, V. Malka, and C. Thaury, Phase-locked laser-wakefield electron acceleration, Nat. Photonics14, 475 (2020)

  35. [35]

    Palastro, J

    J. Palastro, J. Shaw, P. Franke, D. Ramsey, T. Simpson, andD.Froula,Dephasinglesslaserwakefieldacceleration, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 134802 (2020)

  36. [36]

    Ambat, J

    M. Ambat, J. Shaw, J. Pigeon, K. Miller, T. Simpson, D. Froula, and J. P. Palastro, Programmable-trajectory ultrafast flying focus pulses, Opt. Express31, 31354 (2023)

  37. [37]

    T. T. Simpson, D. Ramsey, P. Franke, N. Vafaei- Najafabadi, D.Turnbull, D.H.Froula,andJ.P.Palastro, Nonlinear spatiotemporal control of laser intensity, Opt. Express28, 38516 (2020)

  38. [38]

    T. T. Simpson, D. Ramsey, P. Franke, K. Weichman, M. V. Ambat, D. Turnbull, D. H. Froula, and J. P. Palas- tro, Spatiotemporal control of laser intensity through cross-phase modulation, Opt. Express30, 9878 (2022)

  39. [39]

    Pigeon, P

    J. Pigeon, P. Franke, M. Lim Pac Chong, J. Katz, R. Boni, C. Dorrer, J. P. Palastro, and D. Froula, Ul- trabroadband flying-focus using an axiparabola-echelon pair, Opt. Express32, 576 (2023)

  40. [40]

    Liberman, R

    A. Liberman, R. Lahaye, S. Smartsev, S. Tata, S. Benra- cassa, A.Golovanov, E.Levine, C.Thaury,andV.Malka, Use of spatiotemporal couplings and an axiparabola to control the velocity of peak intensity, Opt. Lett.49, 814 (2024)

  41. [41]

    D. Li, K. Miller, J. Pierce, W. Mori, A. G. Thomas, and J.Palastro,Spatiotemporalcontrolofhigh-intensitylaser pulses with a plasma lens, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013272 (2024)

  42. [42]

    P.-F. Geng, M. Chen, and Z.-M. Sheng, Efficient muon acceleration in laser wakefields driven by single or com- bined laser pulses, Phys. Plasmas31(2024)

  43. [43]

    Turnbull, S

    D. Turnbull, S. Bucht, A. Davies, D. Haberberger, T. Kessler, J. Shaw, and D. Froula, Raman amplifica- tion with a flying focus, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 024801 (2018)

  44. [44]

    Z. Wu, Y. Zuo, Z. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Mu, X. Wang, B. Hu, J. Su, Z. Li, X. Wei,et al., Self-compression of stimulated Raman backscattering by a flying focus, Phys. Rev. E106, 035209 (2022)

  45. [45]

    Howard, D

    A. Howard, D. Turnbull, A. Davies, P. Franke, D. Froula, and J. Palastro, Photon acceleration in a flying focus, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 124801 (2019)

  46. [46]

    Ramsey, B

    D. Ramsey, B. Malaca, A. Di Piazza, M. Formanek, P. Franke, D. H. Froula, M. Pardal, T. T. Simpson, J. Vieira, K. Weichman, and J. P. Palastro, Nonlinear thomson scattering with ponderomotive control, Phys. Rev. E105, 065201 (2022)

  47. [47]

    Kabacinski, E

    A. Kabacinski, E. Oliva, F. Tissandier, J. Gautier, M. Kozlová, J.-P. Goddet, I. A. Andriyash, C. Thaury, P. Zeitoun, and S. Sebban, Spatio-temporal couplings for controlling group velocity in longitudinally pumped seeded soft x-ray lasers, Nat. Photonics17, 354 (2023)

  48. [48]

    H. Ye, Y. Gu, Q. Fan, X. Zhang, S. Wang, F. Tan, J. Zhang, Y. Yang, Y. Yan, J. Wen, Y. Wu, W. Lu, W. Huang, and W. Zhou, Enhanced thomson scattering x-ray sources with flying focus laser pulse, AIP Advances 13, 035330 (2023)

  49. [49]

    T. T. Simpson, J. J. Pigeon, M. V. Ambat, K. G. Miller, D. Ramsey, K. Weichman, D. H. Froula, and J. P. Palas- tro, Spatiotemporal control of two-color terahertz gener- ation, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013041 (2024)

  50. [50]

    S. Fu, B. Groussin, Y. Liu, A. Mysyrowicz, V. Tikhonchuk, and A. Houard, Steering laser-produced THz radiation in air with superluminal ionization fronts, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 045001 (2025)

  51. [51]

    Formanek, D

    M. Formanek, D. Ramsey, J. P. Palastro, and A. Di Pi- azza, Radiation reaction enhancement in flying focus pulses, Phys. Rev. A105, L020203 (2022)

  52. [52]

    Jin and B

    B. Jin and B. Shen, Enhancement of vacuum birefrin- gence with pump laser of flying focus, Phys. Rev. A107, 062213 (2023)

  53. [53]

    Formanek, J

    M. Formanek, J. P. Palastro, D. Ramsey, S. Weber, and A. Di Piazza, Signatures of vacuum birefringence in low- power flying focus pulses, Phys. Rev. D109, 056009 (2024)

  54. [54]

    Z. Gong, S. Cao, J. P. Palastro, and M. R. Edwards, Laser wakefield acceleration of ions with a transverse fly- ing focus, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 265002 (2024)

  55. [55]

    Michel, L

    P. Michel, L. Lancia, A. Oudin, E. Kur, C. Riconda, K. Ou, V. M. Perez-Ramirez, J. Lee, and M. R. Edwards, Photochemically induced acousto-optics in gases, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 024014 (2024)

  56. [56]

    Edwards, V

    M. Edwards, V. Munirov, A. Singh, N. Fasano, E. Kur, N. Lemos, J. Mikhailova, J. Wurtele, and P. Michel, Holographic plasma lenses, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 065003 (2022)

  57. [57]

    M. R. Edwards and P. Michel, Plasma transmission grat- ings for compression of high-intensity laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Appl.18(2022)

  58. [58]

    Michine and H

    Y. Michine and H. Yoneda, Ultra high damage threshold opticsforhighpowerlasers,Commun.Phys.3,24(2020)

  59. [59]

    Palastro, D

    J. Palastro, D. Turnbull, S.-W. Bahk, R. Follett, J. Shaw, D. Haberberger, J. Bromage, and D. Froula, Ionization waves of arbitrary velocity driven by a flying focus, Phys. 9 Rev. A97, 033835 (2018)

  60. [60]

    T. D. Arber, K. Bennett, C. S. Brady, A. Lawrence- Douglas, M. G. Ramsay, N. J. Sircombe, P. Gillies, R. G. Evans, H. Schmitz, A. R. Bell, and C. P. Ridgers, Con- temporary particle-in-cell approach to laser-plasma mod- elling, Plasma Phys. Contr. F.57, 113001 (2015)

  61. [61]

    M. G. Moharam and L. Young, Criterion for Bragg and Raman-Nath diffraction regimes, Appl. Opt.17, 1757 (1978)

  62. [62]

    Sheng, J

    Z.-M. Sheng, J. Zhang, and D. Umstadter, Plasma den- sity gratings induced by intersecting laser pulses in un- derdense plasmas, Appl. Phys. B77, 673 (2003)

  63. [63]

    Lehmann and K

    G. Lehmann and K. H. Spatschek, Transient plasma pho- tonic crystals for high-power lasers, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 225002 (2016)