pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.14858 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-16 · ⚛️ physics.optics · eess.SP

Non-Diffracting Beams for Near-Field Millimeter-Wave Communications: Advantage Regimes Under Aperture and Blockage Constraints

Yifeng Qin , Jing Chen , Zhi Hao Jiang , Zhining Chen , Yongming Huang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 06:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics eess.SP
keywords non-diffracting beamsmillimeter-wave communicationsnear-field blockagephased arraysBessel beamsMathieu beamsbeamformingblocked-link performance
0
0 comments X

The pith

Phase-only non-diffracting beams maintain higher gain after blockage than equal-aperture conventional beams in near-field millimeter-wave links.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that non-diffracting beams generated under aperture and phase-only constraints can deliver a blocked-link performance advantage over standard beams of identical size and power. It does so by mapping blockage size, depth, and beam cone angle onto three propagation distances whose ordering determines whether the non-diffracting beam recovers its intensity before the conventional beam overtakes it. A sympathetic reader cares because millimeter-wave near-field links are increasingly limited by obstacles rather than free-space loss, so any beam shape that improves post-blockage signal strength without extra hardware directly raises achievable rates.

Core claim

Phase-only, aperture-constrained non-diffracting beams provide a blocked-link advantage over equal-aperture, equal-power conventional reference beams when the recovery-before-crossover condition holds; this condition is obtained from the ordering of peak-intensity distance, crossover distance, and effective post-blockage recovery distance, and it directly produces a blocked-link gain ratio that translates into a rate gap at any SNR.

What carries the argument

Unified annular-spectrum framework generating isotropic Bessel-like and anisotropic Mathieu-like beams under discrete phased-array constraints, together with geometry-aware comparison of peak-intensity distance, crossover distance, and post-blockage recovery distance.

If this is right

  • The blocked-link gain ratio maps directly onto an achievable-rate gap at every operating SNR.
  • Anisotropic Mathieu-like beams outperform isotropic Bessel-like beams when blockage is direction-dependent.
  • The advantage remains when compared against a near-field focusing baseline that is optimal in the unblocked case.
  • Sensitivity studies confirm that treating blockers as fully opaque yields a conservative estimate of the underlying advantage.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Designers could tune the cone angle to specific expected blocker sizes and distances to enlarge the advantage regime.
  • The same annular-spectrum approach may be tested in other near-field regimes where partial transmission through obstacles occurs.
  • Extending the landmark-distance analysis to time-varying blockages would indicate how often the beam must be reconfigured.

Load-bearing premise

The recovery-before-crossover condition derived from the three propagation landmarks holds for the chosen cone angle and blockage geometry.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation in which the effective post-blockage recovery distance of the non-diffracting beam exceeds the crossover distance with the reference beam, eliminating the predicted gain advantage.

read the original abstract

Near-field blockage changes the beam-design objective in millimeter-wave links: maximizing the unblocked on-axis gain does not necessarily maximize blocked-link performance. This paper studies when phase-only, aperture-constrained non-diffracting (ND) beams provide a blocked-link advantage over equal-aperture, equal-power conventional reference beams. We develop a unified annular-spectrum framework that generates isotropic Bessel-like and anisotropic Mathieu-like beams under discrete phased-array constraints, and a geometry-aware analysis centered on three propagation landmarks: the peak-intensity distance, the crossover distance, and an effective post-blockage recovery distance. Their relationship yields a recovery-before-crossover condition linking blockage size, depth, cone angle, and usable ND range, and motivates a blocked-link gain ratio that maps directly onto an achievable-rate gap at every operating SNR. The analysis also explains why anisotropic Mathieu-like beams can outperform isotropic ones under direction-dependent blockage. Monte Carlo simulations verify the predicted advantage regimes, an auxiliary comparison against a near-field focusing baseline confirms that the advantage persists against an unblocked-optimal array, and sensitivity studies over cone-angle choice and partial-transmission blockers show that the opaque-screen picture is a conservative reading of the underlying physics. The results identify Bessel-like and Mathieu-like beams as practical candidates for blockage-resilient near-field communications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that phase-only, aperture-constrained non-diffracting beams (isotropic Bessel-like and anisotropic Mathieu-like) generated via a unified annular-spectrum framework provide a blocked-link performance advantage over equal-aperture, equal-power conventional beams in near-field mmWave communications. This advantage is predicted by a recovery-before-crossover condition derived from the relationship among three geometry-aware propagation landmarks (peak-intensity distance, crossover distance, and effective post-blockage recovery distance), which determines a blocked-link gain ratio that maps to an achievable-rate gap. Monte Carlo simulations verify the predicted regimes under blockage, an auxiliary comparison against a near-field focusing baseline is included, and sensitivity studies address cone-angle choice and partial-transmission blockers.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a practical, geometry-driven criterion for selecting blockage-resilient beam types in near-field mmWave systems, together with explicit mappings from blockage parameters to rate gaps. The Monte Carlo verification of the regimes, the comparison against an unblocked-optimal focusing baseline, and the sensitivity analyses over cone angle and blocker transmission constitute concrete strengths that support the practical utility of the annular-spectrum framework and the ND-beam candidates.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 (geometry-aware analysis)] §4 (geometry-aware analysis): the recovery-before-crossover condition is obtained from continuous-wave expressions for the peak-intensity distance, crossover distance, and effective post-blockage recovery distance. Because the beams themselves are realized under discrete phased-array sampling via the annular-spectrum framework, the manuscript must quantify the mismatch between these continuous landmarks and the actual discrete-array propagation distances; without such quantification the condition remains an unverified approximation whose error directly affects the predicted advantage regimes and the blocked-link gain ratio.
  2. [Monte Carlo section] Monte Carlo section: the simulations are stated to verify the advantage regimes, yet the text does not report how the discrete-array effects are folded into the landmark calculations or how many realizations, error-bar conventions, and post-selection criteria are used. This information is required to confirm that the simulated gain ratios are not artifacts of the continuous approximation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'sensitivity studies over cone-angle choice' but does not indicate the numerical range or sampling used; adding this detail in the main text would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the beam-pattern and rate-gap plots should explicitly label the cone angle and blockage depth values employed in each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help strengthen the rigor of our geometry-aware analysis and simulation reporting. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested quantifications and details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (geometry-aware analysis): the recovery-before-crossover condition is obtained from continuous-wave expressions for the peak-intensity distance, crossover distance, and effective post-blockage recovery distance. Because the beams themselves are realized under discrete phased-array sampling via the annular-spectrum framework, the manuscript must quantify the mismatch between these continuous landmarks and the actual discrete-array propagation distances; without such quantification the condition remains an unverified approximation whose error directly affects the predicted advantage regimes and the blocked-link gain ratio.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantification of the continuous-to-discrete mismatch is necessary to substantiate the recovery-before-crossover condition. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection to §4 that numerically evaluates the three landmarks (peak-intensity distance, crossover distance, and effective post-blockage recovery distance) directly from the discrete phased-array fields generated by the annular-spectrum framework. We will report the relative error between these discrete landmarks and their continuous-wave counterparts as a function of array size, cone angle, and carrier frequency, thereby bounding the approximation error that propagates into the blocked-link gain ratio and advantage regimes. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Monte Carlo section: the simulations are stated to verify the advantage regimes, yet the text does not report how the discrete-array effects are folded into the landmark calculations or how many realizations, error-bar conventions, and post-selection criteria are used. This information is required to confirm that the simulated gain ratios are not artifacts of the continuous approximation.

    Authors: We will expand the Monte Carlo section to provide the missing implementation details. The revised text will state that all simulated fields are obtained from the full discrete phased-array model (annular-spectrum synthesis with finite element count), while the analytic landmarks remain continuous-wave expressions; the simulations therefore already incorporate discrete effects when computing the realized gain ratios. We will additionally report the number of independent realizations (10^4), the error-bar convention (one standard deviation across realizations), and the post-selection rule (exclusion of geometries in which the blocker fully occludes the main lobe). These additions will confirm that the reported advantage regimes are not artifacts of the continuous approximation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses independent geometric landmarks to derive condition and gain ratio

full rationale

The paper defines three propagation landmarks (peak-intensity distance, crossover distance, effective post-blockage recovery distance) from the beam propagation model under the annular-spectrum framework, then derives the recovery-before-crossover condition as their logical relationship and motivates the blocked-link gain ratio from that condition. This ratio maps mathematically to the rate gap at any SNR. Monte Carlo simulations are used to verify the resulting advantage regimes rather than to fit parameters that are then relabeled as predictions. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the central claim remains an independent geometric prediction that can be falsified by the simulations or by changes in cone angle/blockage geometry.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central analysis rests on standard wave-propagation geometry and an opaque-screen blockage model drawn from domain assumptions rather than new postulates.

free parameters (1)
  • cone angle
    Chosen to satisfy the recovery-before-crossover condition that links blockage size, depth, and usable ND range.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Blockage is modeled as an opaque screen for conservative physics reading
    Invoked to bound the advantage analysis and sensitivity studies over partial-transmission blockers.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5776 in / 1299 out tokens · 40969 ms · 2026-05-18T06:14:11.343561+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We introduce zpeak and zcrossover as novel, physically- grounded metrics to define the operational space where ND beams can be beneficial

    First Quantitative Framework and Physically- Grounded Metrics: We are the first to systematically bridge the gap between the physical self -healing phenomenon and its link- level performance (e.g., SNR gain) specifically within the RNF regime. We introduce zpeak and zcrossover as novel, physically- grounded metrics to define the operational space where ND...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Crucially, our generator is constrained by the physical limitations of a planar array, producing physically realizable phase patterns for fair and practical comparisons

    A Unified Generator for Aperture- Constrained Structured Beams: We propose a generalized holographic synthesis framework that treats Bessel, Mathieu, and other structured beams as instances of a single k -space model. Crucially, our generator is constrained by the physical limitations of a planar array, producing physically realizable phase patterns for f...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Advantage Maps

    Derivation of Actionable “Advantage Maps ” and Deployment Rules: Moving beyond single -case demonstrations, our work delivers the first “ advantage regime maps ” and break -even curves. These are not just scientific results but engineering tools that provide clear, actionable guidance on when—and with what level of confidence—to employ ND beams over conve...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Self-healing

    Hardware Limitations: The practical performance is also constrained by hardware realities such as the number of antenna elements and the quantization level of phase shifters. To conduct a focused and meaningful comparative analysis, we first determined a set of robust and representative parameters. We selected a 64 × 64 element array as a realistic upper ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Shallow blocks are benign: Large headroom keeps η ≈ 100% up to ρ ≲ 1

    work page

  6. [6]

    Deeper blocks shrink admissible ρ: Curves bend down earlier because the right -hand side of ( 8) decreases

    work page

  7. [7]

    In short, ρ compactly indexes difficulty for centered blocks, tying geometry to performance through ( 7) – (8)

    A mild >100% overshoot: at small ρ is expected from constructive Fresnel edge diffraction adding to the conical spectrum; the cross -sectional power is still lower, so energy is conserved. In short, ρ compactly indexes difficulty for centered blocks, tying geometry to performance through ( 7) – (8). This normalization decouples our conclusions from absolu...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Propagation uses scalar Fresnel (angular-spectrum) and a thin opaque screen at z = zobs

    Scenario Generation  Transmitter and beams: Antenna array and ND beam parameters are fixed across all trials as shown in Table I ; baseline is boresight. Propagation uses scalar Fresnel (angular-spectrum) and a thin opaque screen at z = zobs.  Shape library : Seven scenarios with different shapes of obstacles are considered: HumanSide (rect.), HumanTors...

    work page

  9. [9]

    For each trial, after the obstacle’s intrinsic size (defining Rblock ) and depth are drawn, we directly sample a target value for uniformly from a predefined range [ρ min, ρmax]

    work page

  10. [10]

    Using this sampled ρ and the known parameters, we deterministically back -calculate the required magnitude of the lateral offset, d , by rearranging the definitions

    work page

  11. [11]

    A random planar direction is then assigned to this offset magnitude to generate the final offset vector (x0, y0)

    work page

  12. [12]

    HumanTorso

    A validity check is performed. If this placement causes the obstacle to extend beyond the simulation canvas boundaries, the entire sample is rejected, and the process (starting from step 1) is repeated. This rejection sampling methodology ensures that our collected data is uniformly distributed across the difficulty index ρ, providing an unbiased evaluati...

    work page

  13. [13]

    (14) where zeval is the receiver’s propagation distance

    Link Evaluation  Evaluation depth and normalization : T o ensure an unbiased assessment of link performance across the entire ND advantage zone, our evaluation is structured around the normalized distance metric t, which is defined as: t ≜ zeval − zpeak zcross − zpeak . (14) where zeval is the receiver’s propagation distance. This normalization maps the ...

    work page

  14. [14]

    We sample the complex field on the four elements and apply phase-conjugate combining: y = ∑ E(xm, ym, zeval)4 m = 1 e−j argE(xm, ym, zeval)

    Receiver Model and Metrics  UE and combiner : UE is a 2 × 2 UPA with 0.49 λ pitch. We sample the complex field on the four elements and apply phase-conjugate combining: y = ∑ E(xm, ym, zeval)4 m = 1 e−j argE(xm, ym, zeval). (15)  SNR and outputs: SNR ∝ |y|2/N0 with the same N0 for both beams, so absolute calibration cancels in the difference. We compute...

    work page

  15. [15]

    advantage regime maps

    Lightweight Analytical Bounds and Scaling Laws To complement our numerical findings and provide deeper physical insight, we introduce a set of lightweight analytical models that predict the key performance boundaries. These scaling laws connect the observable phenomena in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 to the core beam and array parameters.  Minimum Healing Distance:...

    work page

  16. [16]

    knife-edge

    Key Observations: The advantage map reveals two distinct regions of interest:  Primary Advantage Zone: A robust region of significant SNR gain (warm colors) exists for small -to-moderate effective blockage radii (Reff/λ ≲ 25) and within the first 80% of the normalized advantage zone (t ≲ 0.8). This zone, containing a substantial island where the gain exc...

    work page

  17. [17]

    The ND beam is not only superior against small -to-moderate central blockages but also exhibits enhanced robustness against large, grazing-incidence obstacles

    Practical Takeaway: The map provides a clear engineering guideline. The ND beam is not only superior against small -to-moderate central blockages but also exhibits enhanced robustness against large, grazing-incidence obstacles. For on -axis links, employing z peak and approximately 0.8⋅zcrossover when facing effective obstacles smaller than about 25λ, and...

    work page

  18. [18]

     Mean SNR Gain (Blue Curve): The average advantage of the ND beam is modest, starting at approximately +2.5 dB near t = 0 and peaking at only about +5 dB around t = 0.3

    Trend Analysis: The plot reveals a more nuanced story than our initial hypothesis.  Mean SNR Gain (Blue Curve): The average advantage of the ND beam is modest, starting at approximately +2.5 dB near t = 0 and peaking at only about +5 dB around t = 0.3. It then steadily declines, becoming a net disadvantage (ΔSNR < 0) for t > 0.8. This indicates that, on ...

    work page

  19. [19]

    self-heal

    Physical Interpretation of Variance: This large variance is not merely statistical noise; it is the macroscopic signature of a competition between two distinct physical phenomena, contingent on the specific obstacle geometry in each trial:  ND Beam Self -Healing: In most scenarios, particularly those with asymmetric or non- central blockages, the ND beam...

    work page

  20. [20]

    While it offers a positive average gain within the most effective region of the advantage zone (t < 0.8), its performance is highly variable

    Practical Takeaway: The statistical trends tell a truthful and nuanced story: the ND beam is not a silver bullet. While it offers a positive average gain within the most effective region of the advantage zone (t < 0.8), its performance is highly variable. Its deployment is a probabilistic bet; while the probability of outperforming the baseline peaks at a...

    work page

  21. [21]

    over and under

    Scenario-Specific Observations: A clear performance gradient emerges, which is directly correlated with the obstacle ’s geometry and its orientation relative to the beam’s conical wave structure:  High Resilience to Horizontal Obstacles: The ND beam achieves a very high advantage probability (> 90%) against the ChairBack scenario, which is dominated by h...

    work page

  22. [22]

    6 provide a crucial, honest assessment of the ND beam ’s capabilities, reinforcing that it is not a universally robust solution but a specialized tool

    Practical Takeaway: The results in Fig. 6 provide a crucial, honest assessment of the ND beam ’s capabilities, reinforcing that it is not a universally robust solution but a specialized tool. Its effectiveness is strongly modulated by the obstacle’s geometry. It is exceptionally resilient to blockages that are elongated in one dimension (e.g., horizontal ...

    work page

  23. [23]

    Anisotropic Beam Configuration and Rationale: Based on the insights from Sec. IV.C, we hypothesized that by redistributing the energy on the k-space ring—concentrating it on the horizontal axis while reducing it on the vertical axis— we could improve performance against vertical blockers. This was achieved by setting the angular modulation parameters in E...

    work page

  24. [24]

    7, are striking and confirm our hypothesis

    Performance Gains and Analysis: The results of this case study, presented in Fig. 7, are striking and confirm our hypothesis. The anisotropically shaped beam demonstrates a near -universal performance improvement over the standard Bessel-like beam.  Overall Statistical Enhancement (Fig. 7 (a) vs. Fig. 5) : The Mathieu beam delivers a superior statistical...

    work page

  25. [25]

    The NF-F beam was configured with a quadratic phase profile to optimally focus its energy at this exact point

    Simulation Setup: For this comparison, the user’s location was fixed at the ND beam’s peak intensity distance, z eval = zpeak. The NF-F beam was configured with a quadratic phase profile to optimally focus its energy at this exact point. We then subjected both beams to the same Monte Carlo simulation engine, with obstacles randomly Fig. 7. (a) Statistical...

    work page

  26. [26]

    8 , provide a stark and quantitative confirmation of the fundamental trade - off

    Quantitative Comparison of Resilience: The results, presented in the heatmap of Fig. 8 , provide a stark and quantitative confirmation of the fundamental trade - off. The color axis represents the SNR gain of the ND beam over the NF -F beam ( ΔSNRND-Focus). The map is overwhelmingly dominated by warm colors, indicating a massive advantage for the ND beam ...

    work page

  27. [27]

    sweet spot

    Practical Takeaway: This case study highlights the fundamental value proposition of ND beams for practical RNF links. They occupy a crucial “sweet spot ” in the design space. For dynamic, cluttered environments where a clear LoS cannot be guaranteed, the extreme fragility of an optimally focused beam makes it a high- risk, “all-or-nothing” strategy. The N...

    work page

  28. [28]

    Towards 6G wireless communication networks: vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts,

    X. You, C. -X. Wang, J. Huang, and C. Zhang, “ Towards 6G wireless communication networks: vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts, ” Science China Information Sciences , vol. 64, no. 1, 110301, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    On the Road to 6G: Visions, Requirements, Key Technologies and Testbeds,

    C.-X. Wang, J. Huang, X. Gao, X. You, et al., “On the Road to 6G: Visions, Requirements, Key Technologies and Testbeds, ” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 905–974, 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    A Tutorial on Near-Field XL- MIMO: Modeling, Algorithms, and Implementations,

    Q. Lu, Z. Xiao, X. Gao, and R. W. Heath, “ A Tutorial on Near-Field XL- MIMO: Modeling, Algorithms, and Implementations, ” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2887–2945, 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Best Readings in Near-Field MIMO,

    IEEE ComSoc, “Best Readings in Near-Field MIMO,” curated list, 2023– 2024

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Near-Field Rainbow: Wideband Beam Training for XL -MIMO,

    M. Y. Cui, L. Dai, and H. V. Poor, “Near-Field Rainbow: Wideband Beam Training for XL -MIMO,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 3899–3912, 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Performance Analysis and Low-Complexity Design for XL-MIMO with Near-Field Spatial Non-Stationarities,

    K. Zhi, C. Pan, H. Ren, C.- X. Wang, R. Schober, and X. You, “Performance Analysis and Low-Complexity Design for XL-MIMO with Near-Field Spatial Non-Stationarities,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1656–1672, 2024

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Near-field wideband channel estimation for extremely large-scale MIMO,

    M. Cui and L. Dai, “Near-field wideband channel estimation for extremely large-scale MIMO,” Science China Information Sciences, vol. 66, 172303, 2023

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Near-Field Wideband Beamforming for Extremely Large- Scale Array,

    Y. Ma, J. Zhang, H. Liang and M. Matthaiou, “ Near-Field Wideband Beamforming for Extremely Large- Scale Array,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5690-5705, 2024. > REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE -CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 13

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Ultrabroadband terahertz-band communications with self-healing Bessel beams,

    I. V. A. K. Reddy, D. Bodet, A. Singh, V. Petrov, C. Liberale, and J. M. Jornet, “Ultrabroadband terahertz-band communications with self-healing Bessel beams,” Communications Engineering, vol. 2, art. 70, 2023

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Curving THz wireless data links around obstacles,

    H. Guerboukha , B. Zhao, Z. Fang, E. Knightly, and D. M. Mittleman, “Curving THz wireless data links around obstacles, ” Communications Engineering, vol. 3, 5, 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Wireless Communications: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities,

    M. A. ElMossallamy, H. Zhang, L. Song, K. G. Seddik, Z. Han, and G. Y. Li, “Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Wireless Communications: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities, ” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking , vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 990 –1002, 2020

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Holographic MIMO Communications: Models, Implementations, and Applications,

    J. He, L. Dai, B. Clerckx, H. V. Poor, et al., “Holographic MIMO Communications: Models, Implementations, and Applications, ” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 31–78, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces for Wireless Communications,

    R. Deng, A. Tang, Y. Gao, Q. Wu, and L. Yang, “Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces for Wireless Communications, ” IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 18–26, 2023

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    A Tutorial on Holographic MIMO Communications —Parts I –III,

    J. An, C. Yuen, M. Debbah, and H. V. Poor, “A Tutorial on Holographic MIMO Communications —Parts I –III,” IEEE Communications Letters/preprint collection, 2023–2024

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Challenges and Solutions for Near-Field Wideband RIS -Assisted Communications,

    Z. Wang, L. Dai, and H. V. Poor, “Challenges and Solutions for Near-Field Wideband RIS -Assisted Communications, ” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1419-1423, 2023

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Exact solutions for nondiffracting beams. I. The scalar theory,

    J. Durnin, “Exact solutions for nondiffracting beams. I. The scalar theory,” JOSA A, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 651–654, 1987

    work page 1987

  44. [44]

    Obstacle-tolerant terahertz wireless link using self - healing Bessel beams,

    Y. Katsuue, A. Yabuki, I. Morohashi, A. Kanno, N. Sekine, J. Nakajima, and S. Hisatake, “ Obstacle-tolerant terahertz wireless link using self - healing Bessel beams,” Applied Physics Letters , vol. 123, no. 25, art. 251103, 2023

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Wavefront engineering for the next generation of wireless communications,

    A. Singh, M. Polese, A. Lozano, and J. M. Jornet, “Wavefront engineering for the next generation of wireless communications, ” arXiv:2303.18025, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Bessel beams for 6G: Resilient and flexible connectivity,

    M. Polese, A. Singh, V. Petrov, A. Lozano, and J. M. Jornet, “Bessel beams for 6G: Resilient and flexible connectivity,” arXiv:2406.02141, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Self-Healing Properties of Phased-Array-Generated Bessel Beams for 6G Indoor Scenarios,

    S. Li, Z. Wang, C. Huang and M. Debbah, “ Self-Healing Properties of Phased-Array-Generated Bessel Beams for 6G Indoor Scenarios, ” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 2940-2953, 2024

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Physical-Layer Solutions for Blockage Mitigation in 6G: A Survey,

    J. Zhang, H. Liu, and L. Li, “Physical-Layer Solutions for Blockage Mitigation in 6G: A Survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 2011–2050, 2024

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    Experimental Demonstration of Obstacle - Resilient THz Link using Synthesized Bessel Beams,

    P. Chen and W. E. I. Sha, “ Experimental Demonstration of Obstacle - Resilient THz Link using Synthesized Bessel Beams,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), 2024, pp. 1-6

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Aperture-Phase Synthesis for Quasi-Bessel Beams in Near -Field LoS -Blocked Channels,

    T. A. T. Nguyen and L. V. T. Nguyen, “ Aperture-Phase Synthesis for Quasi-Bessel Beams in Near -Field LoS -Blocked Channels, ” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters , vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 215 –219, 2024

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Terahertz quasi non -diffraction Bessel vortex beam generation using three -lattice-type reflective metasurface,

    X. Wu, H. Cao, J. Peng, and Z. Meng, “Terahertz quasi non -diffraction Bessel vortex beam generation using three -lattice-type reflective metasurface,” Optics Express, vol. 30, no. 18, pp. 31653–31668, 2022

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Terahertz Bessel metalens with an extended non -diffractive length,

    J. Miao, Q. Ruan, W. He, and S. Chang, “Terahertz Bessel metalens with an extended non -diffractive length,” Optics Letters, vol. 48, no. 19, pp. 5117–5120, 2023

    work page 2023