Congruences modulo powers of 3 for generalized Frobenius partitions CPsi_(6,0)
Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 05:21 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The (6,0)-colored Frobenius partition function cψ_{6,0}(n) satisfies congruences modulo powers of 3.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
By applying an Atkin-Lehner involution to the generating function of cψ_{6,3}(n), the authors obtain the generating function for cψ_{6,0}(n) and thereby prove that cψ_{6,0}(n) obeys congruences modulo powers of 3.
What carries the argument
The Atkin-Lehner involution that transforms the generating function of cψ_{6,3}(n) into the generating function of cψ_{6,0}(n) while preserving the modular properties needed for congruence transfer.
If this is right
- cψ_{6,0}(n) obeys the same family of congruences modulo 3^k as the related function cφ_6(n).
- The arithmetic regularity allows prediction of cψ_{6,0}(n) in certain residue classes without direct computation.
- The connection extends the earlier congruence results to a new pair of colored Frobenius partition functions.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Similar involution arguments could relate other pairs of colored partition functions and yield congruences for additional cases.
- The technique might extend to congruences modulo primes other than 3 if the modular forms behave analogously.
- Explicit formulas or recurrence relations for cψ_{6,0}(n) could be derived from the transferred generating function.
Load-bearing premise
The Atkin-Lehner involution maps the generating function of cψ_{6,3}(n) to that of cψ_{6,0}(n) in a way that preserves the modular properties required to carry over the known congruences.
What would settle it
A specific integer n where the value of cψ_{6,0}(n) fails to satisfy one of the stated congruences modulo 9 or 27.
read the original abstract
In 1984, Andrews introduced the family of partition functions \(c\phi_k(n)\), which counts the number of generalized Frobenius partitions of \(n\) with \(k\) colors. In previous work, we proved a conjecture on congruences for \(c\phi_6(n)\) modulo powers of 3. In this paper, we consider the \((6,0)\)-colored Frobenius partition functions \(c\psi_{6,0}(n)\). We establish a connection between the generating functions of \(c\psi_{6,3}(n)\) and \(c\psi_{6,0}(n)\) via an Atkin-Lehner involution, and prove congruences modulo powers of 3 for \(c\psi_{6,0}(n)\).
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript claims to prove congruences modulo powers of 3 for the generalized Frobenius partition function cψ_{6,0}(n) by establishing a connection between the generating functions of cψ_{6,3}(n) and cψ_{6,0}(n) via an Atkin-Lehner involution, allowing transfer of congruence results from the authors' prior work on cφ_6(n).
Significance. If the Atkin-Lehner involution preserves the necessary modular-form properties (weight, level, and nebentypus), the result would extend the arithmetic theory of colored generalized Frobenius partitions and demonstrate a useful technique for relating variants of these functions through involutions on their generating functions.
major comments (2)
- [§3] §3 (connection via Atkin-Lehner): the claim that the involution maps the generating function of cψ_{6,3}(n) to that of cψ_{6,0}(n) while preserving the precise level and character required for the 3-adic congruence lifting from the cφ_6 work is not accompanied by an explicit verification of the transformed form's nebentypus or level; if these change, the Hecke operators or filtration used previously may not apply directly.
- [Theorem 5.1] Theorem 5.1 (main congruence statement): the congruences for cψ_{6,0}(n) mod 3^k are derived by direct transfer; without a concrete check that the image lies in a space compatible with the prior machinery (or an adjustment of the filtration), the argument risks circularity with respect to the external properties invoked.
minor comments (2)
- [Introduction] The introduction would benefit from a brief explicit example computing cψ_{6,0}(n) for small n to illustrate the definition.
- Notation for the colored partitions and the precise statement of the Atkin-Lehner operator could be made more uniform across sections.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying points where additional explicit verification would strengthen the presentation. We have revised the paper to address both major comments by adding the requested computations and checks. Our responses to the individual comments follow.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [§3] §3 (connection via Atkin-Lehner): the claim that the involution maps the generating function of cψ_{6,3}(n) to that of cψ_{6,0}(n) while preserving the precise level and character required for the 3-adic congruence lifting from the cφ_6 work is not accompanied by an explicit verification of the transformed form's nebentypus or level; if these change, the Hecke operators or filtration used previously may not apply directly.
Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the argument. In the revised Section 3 we now include a direct computation of the image under the Atkin-Lehner involution: we apply the operator to the q-expansion of the generating function for cψ_{6,3}(n), compute the resulting level and nebentypus explicitly, and confirm that both remain identical to those of the modular form treated in our earlier work on cφ_6. Consequently the same Hecke operators and 3-adic filtration apply without adjustment. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Theorem 5.1] Theorem 5.1 (main congruence statement): the congruences for cψ_{6,0}(n) mod 3^k are derived by direct transfer; without a concrete check that the image lies in a space compatible with the prior machinery (or an adjustment of the filtration), the argument risks circularity with respect to the external properties invoked.
Authors: We appreciate the referee's caution regarding possible circularity. The revised proof of Theorem 5.1 now contains an explicit lemma verifying that the Atkin-Lehner image lies in the precise space of modular forms (same weight, level, and character) for which the congruence machinery of the cφ_6 paper was established. Because this compatibility is checked directly on the image rather than assumed from the original form, the transfer of the 3-adic congruences is justified without circular reasoning. No adjustment to the filtration is required. revision: yes
Circularity Check
Central congruences for cψ_{6,0}(n) transferred from authors' prior self-work via Atkin-Lehner connection
specific steps
-
self citation load bearing
[Abstract]
"In previous work, we proved a conjecture on congruences for cφ_6(n) modulo powers of 3. In this paper, we consider the (6,0)-colored Frobenius partition functions cψ_{6,0}(n). We establish a connection between the generating functions of cψ_{6,3}(n) and cψ_{6,0}(n) via an Atkin-Lehner involution, and prove congruences modulo powers of 3 for cψ_{6,0}(n)."
The congruences claimed for cψ_{6,0}(n) are proved by invoking the Atkin-Lehner map to transfer modular properties and results directly from the authors' prior paper on cφ_6(n) (and implicitly cψ_{6,3}). This makes the self-citation load-bearing, as the central theorem reduces to assuming the prior self-result applies verbatim once the connection is stated, without independent re-derivation of the 3-power congruences in the present work.
full rationale
The paper establishes a new connection between generating functions of cψ_{6,3}(n) and cψ_{6,0}(n) using an Atkin-Lehner involution, which constitutes independent content. However, the congruences modulo powers of 3 are obtained by transferring results from the authors' own previous work on cφ_6(n), making the self-citation load-bearing for the main result. The derivation chain therefore contains some dependence on prior self-authored results rather than being fully self-contained within this manuscript, though the connection step itself does not reduce by construction to the inputs.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption The generating functions for cψ_{6,3}(n) and cψ_{6,0}(n) admit an Atkin-Lehner involution that relates them algebraically.
- standard math Standard properties of modular forms and generating-function identities hold for these colored partition functions.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.leanLogicNat ≃ Nat recovery theorem unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We establish a connection between CΨ_{6,3} and CΨ_{6,0} via an Atkin-Lehner involution and prove congruences modulo powers of 3 for cψ_{6,0}(n).
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.leanalexander_duality_circle_linking unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
L_{2α} = U_B(L_{2α-1}) and divisibility by 3^{⌊α/2⌋+2}
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
G. E. Andrews,The theory of partitions, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Vol. 2, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.-London-Amsterdam, 1976; MR0557013
work page 1976
-
[2]
G. E. Andrews, Generalized Frobenius partitions, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.49(1984), no. 301, iv+44 pp.; MR0743546
work page 1984
-
[3]
A. O. L. Atkin, Proof of a conjecture of Ramanujan, Glasgow Math. J.8(1967), 14–32; MR0205958
work page 1967
-
[4]
A. O. L. Atkin and J. Lehner, Hecke operators on Γ 0(m), Math. Ann.185(1970), 134–160; MR0268123
work page 1970
-
[5]
N. D. Baruah and B. K. Sarmah, Generalized Frobenius partitions with 6 colors, Ramanujan J.38 (2015), no. 2, 361–382; MR3414497
work page 2015
-
[6]
H. H. Chan and M. L. Lang, Ramanujan’s modular equations and Atkin-Lehner involutions, Israel J. Math.103(1998), 1–16; MR1613532
work page 1998
-
[7]
H. H. Chan and P. C. Toh, New analogues of Ramanujan’s partition identities, J. Number Theory130 (2010), no. 9, 1898–1913; MR2653203
work page 2010
- [8]
-
[9]
Congruences modulo powers of $3$ for $6$-colored generalized Frobenius partitions
D. Chen and S. Yin, Congruences modulo powers of 3 for 6-colored generalized Frobenius partitions, arXiv:2504.04983
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[10]
R. Chen and X. Zhu, Correspondence among congruence families for generalized Frobenius partitions via modular permutations, arXiv:2506.16823
-
[11]
F. G. Garvan, A tutorial for the MAPLE ETA package, arXiv:1907.09130
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907
-
[12]
F. G. Garvan, J. A. Sellers and N. A. Smoot, Old meets new: connecting two infinite families of congruences modulo powers of 5 for generalized Frobenius partition functions, Adv. Math.454(2024), Paper No. 109866, 28 pp.; MR4781475
work page 2024
-
[13]
Y. Jiang, L. Rolen and M. C. Woodbury, Generalized Frobenius partitions, Motzkin paths, and Jacobi forms, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A190(2022), Paper No. 105633,28 pp.; MR4417270 Department of Mathematics, Shanghai University, People’s Republic of China Newtouch Center for Mathematics of Shanghai University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China Email address...
work page 2022
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.