pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.24879 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-28 · 🧬 q-bio.QM · physics.med-ph

General Microstructure Factor Analysis of Diffusion MRI in Gray-Matter Predicts Cognitive Scores

Lucas Z. Brito , Ryan P. Cabeen , David H. Laidlaw This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 03:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.QM physics.med-ph
keywords diffusion MRIgray matterNODDIprincipal component analysiscognitive scoresmicrostructureisotropic volume fractionHuman Connectome Project
0
0 comments X

The pith

A global factor from gray-matter isotropic volume fraction, extracted via PCA on NODDI parameters, correlates with cognitive scores for reading, vocabulary, and fluidity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that principal component analysis applied to region-averaged NODDI parameters from diffusion MRI can capture general patterns of gray-matter microstructure across individuals. The component tied to isotropic volume fraction accounts for substantial inter-individual differences and shows significant correlations with specific NIH Toolbox cognitive measures, especially reading and vocabulary performance along with cognitive fluidity. This global approach yields complementary markers of structure-function relationships that go beyond traditional region-by-region analyses. A sympathetic reader would care because it suggests a simple, whole-brain summary of gray-matter properties could serve as an exploratory biomarker for studying cognition at the population level.

Core claim

Using data from the Human Connectome Project Young Adult study, the authors average NODDI parameters across gray-matter regions and apply PCA to derive general microstructure factors. The factor derived from isotropic volume fraction explains substantial variability and correlates significantly with NIH Toolbox scores for reading, vocabulary, and cognitive fluidity. The work shows that these PCA-based global indicators provide markers of structure-function relationships that extend beyond localized region-specific analyses and may function as population-level exploratory biomarkers for cognition and cortical organization.

What carries the argument

Principal component analysis on region-averaged NODDI parameters, where the isotropic volume fraction component acts as the primary carrier of the correlation to cognitive scores.

If this is right

  • Global gray-matter patterns summarized by a few PCA factors can serve as markers that complement region-specific diffusion analyses.
  • The isotropic volume fraction factor in particular relates to performance on reading, vocabulary, and cognitive fluidity tasks.
  • Such general microstructure factors offer a way to study population-level links between brain structure and cognitive function.
  • These factors may help explore cortical organization without requiring detailed localization of effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The prominence of isotropic volume fraction suggests that extracellular or free-water content in gray matter may play a role in supporting certain cognitive abilities.
  • Applying the same PCA-derived factor to datasets from older adults or clinical populations could test whether it tracks changes in cognition over time or in disease.
  • This global-factor approach might integrate with other modalities such as functional MRI to examine how microstructure patterns align with network-level activity.

Load-bearing premise

That the principal components extracted from averaged NODDI parameters in the HCP dataset reflect genuine global gray-matter microstructure patterns linked to cognition rather than confounds such as motion, age, or scanner effects.

What would settle it

Re-running the PCA after regressing out age, head motion, and scanner variables from the NODDI parameters and checking whether the correlation between the isotropic volume fraction factor and the cognitive scores remains statistically significant.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.24879 by David H. Laidlaw, Lucas Z. Brito, Ryan P. Cabeen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We study the relationship between global trends in NODDI gray-matter mi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distribution of mean per-region microstrucutural values across subjects. Ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: General factor weights corresponding to the first principal components of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Scree plots for the PCA analysis of the mean microstructural parameters for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Lines of best fit for each of the significant trends observed. The dependent axis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revealed important insights into white matter microstructure, but its application to gray matter remains comparatively less explored. Here, we investigate whether global patterns of gray-matter microstructure can be captured through neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) and whether such patterns are predictive of cognitive performance. Using diffusion MRI and behavioral data from the Human Connectome Project Young Adult study, we derive region averaged NODDI parameters and apply principal component analysis (PCA) to construct general gray-matter microstructure factors. We find that the factor derived from isotropic volume fraction explained substantial inter-individual variability and was significantly correlated with specific cognitive scores collected from the NIH Toolbox. In particular, the isotropic volume fraction factor is linked to reading and vocabulary performance and to cognitive fluidity. Our findings demonstrate that PCA-based global indicators of gray-matter microstructure provide complementary markers of structure-function relationships, extending beyond region-specific analyses. Our results suggest that general microstructure factors may serve as population-level exploratory biomarkers for studying cognition and cortical organization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that principal component analysis of region-averaged NODDI parameters (particularly isotropic volume fraction, f_iso) derived from gray-matter diffusion MRI in the HCP Young Adult cohort produces general microstructure factors. The leading f_iso factor accounts for substantial inter-individual variance and correlates significantly with NIH Toolbox scores for reading, vocabulary, and cognitive fluidity, positioning these factors as complementary global biomarkers for structure-function relationships that extend beyond region-specific analyses.

Significance. If the reported associations prove robust to standard confounds, the work would provide a data-driven method for extracting population-level gray-matter microstructure signatures predictive of cognition, potentially useful as exploratory biomarkers in large-scale studies of cortical organization.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract/Results] Abstract/Results: The reported correlations between the f_iso-derived factor and cognitive scores provide no information on post-exclusion sample size, multiple-comparison correction, effect sizes (e.g., Pearson r or R²), or inclusion of covariates such as age, sex, education, or head-motion metrics (mean framewise displacement). Because residual motion in HCP data is known to affect both NODDI parameters and cognitive performance, the absence of these controls makes it impossible to determine whether the factor captures microstructure variation independent of artifacts.
  2. [Methods] Methods: The PCA is applied directly to region-averaged NODDI parameters without reported checks for whether the first component reflects spatially specific patterns versus global or scanner-related effects; explicit examination of factor loadings or spatial maps is needed to support the claim of 'general' gray-matter microstructure factors.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Adding the numerical correlation coefficients and exact p-values would allow readers to gauge effect magnitude immediately.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which have helped us clarify the robustness and interpretation of our findings. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to incorporate the suggested details and analyses.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract/Results] Abstract/Results: The reported correlations between the f_iso-derived factor and cognitive scores provide no information on post-exclusion sample size, multiple-comparison correction, effect sizes (e.g., Pearson r or R²), or inclusion of covariates such as age, sex, education, or head-motion metrics (mean framewise displacement). Because residual motion in HCP data is known to affect both NODDI parameters and cognitive performance, the absence of these controls makes it impossible to determine whether the factor captures microstructure variation independent of artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that these statistical details and controls are essential for assessing the validity of the reported associations. In the revised manuscript, we now report the post-exclusion sample size (N=1,065), apply FDR correction for multiple comparisons across the tested cognitive scores, provide Pearson r and R² effect sizes, and include age, sex, education level, and mean framewise displacement as covariates in partial correlation models. Updated results in the Abstract and Results sections show that the key associations with reading, vocabulary, and cognitive fluidity remain significant after these controls. A new supplementary table compares correlations with and without covariates to demonstrate independence from motion and demographic confounds. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods: The PCA is applied directly to region-averaged NODDI parameters without reported checks for whether the first component reflects spatially specific patterns versus global or scanner-related effects; explicit examination of factor loadings or spatial maps is needed to support the claim of 'general' gray-matter microstructure factors.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important suggestion to strengthen the characterization of the components. In the revised Methods and Results, we now include the factor loadings for the leading principal component of f_iso across all gray-matter regions, along with spatial maps of the component scores. These analyses reveal relatively uniform loadings across cortical and subcortical gray-matter areas, consistent with a general rather than spatially specific or scanner-related pattern. We have also added a supplementary figure comparing the observed eigenvalue spectrum to that from permuted data to confirm the first component exceeds chance levels. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Data-driven PCA on NODDI parameters followed by independent correlation exhibits no circularity

full rationale

The derivation consists of computing region-averaged NODDI parameters from HCP diffusion MRI, applying PCA to obtain general gray-matter microstructure factors, and then performing post-hoc correlations of those factors against separate NIH Toolbox cognitive scores. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs: the factors are extracted from the diffusion data alone, and the cognitive associations are evaluated on independent behavioral measurements without any self-referential definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. The chain is therefore self-contained and externally falsifiable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions of the NODDI biophysical model for diffusion signal decomposition and on the validity of PCA for extracting global factors from regional averages; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond these established tools.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption NODDI model accurately decomposes diffusion signal into intra-neurite, extra-neurite, and isotropic compartments in gray matter
    Invoked when deriving region-averaged NODDI parameters from raw diffusion MRI data
  • domain assumption Principal component analysis on regional averages yields interpretable global microstructure factors
    Central to constructing the reported factors from the parameter maps

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1251 out tokens · 22366 ms · 2026-05-18T03:24:14.379357+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We derive region averaged NODDI parameters and apply principal component analysis (PCA) to construct general gray-matter microstructure factors... the factor derived from isotropic volume fraction explained substantial inter-individual variability and was significantly correlated with specific cognitive scores

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jones, Diffusion MRI, Oxford University Press, 2010

    D. Jones, Diffusion MRI, Oxford University Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    J. A. Silva-Rudberg, A. P. Mecca, Diffusion imaging of gray matter microstructure in alzheimer’s disease, Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 101 (2024) 437–439. URL:https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-240673. doi:10.3233/JAD-240673, pMID: 39213077. 15

    work page doi:10.3233/jad-240673 2024

  3. [3]

    Aggarwal, D

    M. Aggarwal, D. W. Nauen, J. C. Troncoso, S. Mori, Probing region- specific microstructure of human cortical areas using high angular and spatial resolution diffusion MRI, Neuroimage 105 (2014) 198–207

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Assaf, Imaging laminar structures in the gray matter with diffusion MRI, Neuroimage 197 (2018) 677–688

    Y. Assaf, Imaging laminar structures in the gray matter with diffusion MRI, Neuroimage 197 (2018) 677–688

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Baratti, A

    C. Baratti, A. S. Barnett, C. Pierpaoli, Comparative MR imaging study of brain maturation in kittens with t1, t2, and the trace of the diffusion tensor, Radiology 210 (1999) 133–142

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    Radhakrishnan, I

    H. Radhakrishnan, I. J. Bennett, C. E. Stark, Higher-order multi-shell diffusionmeasurescomplementtensormetricsandvolumeingraymatter when predicting age and cognition, Neuroimage 253 (2022) 119063

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Venkatesh, S

    A. Venkatesh, S. M. Stark, C. E. Stark, I. J. Bennett, Age- and memory- related differences in hippocampal gray matter integrity are better captured by noddi compared to single-tensor diffusion imag- ing, Neurobiology of Aging 96 (2020) 12–21. URL:https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197458020302608. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiol...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.08.004 2020

  8. [8]

    Radhakrishnan, S

    H. Radhakrishnan, S. M. Stark, C. E. L. Stark, Microstructural al- terations in hippocampal subfields mediate age-related memory decline in humans, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Volume 12 - 2020 (2020). URL:https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aging-neuroscienc e/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00094. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2020.0 0094

    work page doi:10.3389/fnagi.2020.00094 2020

  9. [9]

    Colgan, B

    N. Colgan, B. Siow, J. M. O’Callaghan, I. F. Harrison, J. A. Wells, H. E. Holmes, O. Ismail, S. Richardson, D. C. Alexander, E. C. Collins, E. M. Fisher, R. Johnson, A. J. Schwarz, Z. Ahmed, M. J. O’Neill, T. K. Murray, H. Zhang, M. F. Lythgoe, Application of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) to a tau pathology model of alzheimer’...

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    K. M. Lynch, R. P. Cabeen, A. W. Toga, Spatiotemporal patterns of cortical microstructural maturation in children and adolescents with diffusion MRI, Hum Brain Mapp 45 (2023) e26528. 16

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Palombo, A

    M. Palombo, A. Ianus, M. Guerreri, D. Nunes, D. C. Alexander, N. Shemesh, H. Zhang, Sandi: A compartment-based model for non- invasive apparent soma and neurite imaging by diffusion mri, Neu- roImage 215 (2020) 116835. URL:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1053811920303220. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116835

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116835 2020

  12. [12]

    Zhang, T

    H. Zhang, T. Schneider, C. A. Wheeler-Kingshott, D. C. Alexander, Noddi: Practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imag- ing of the human brain, NeuroImage 61 (2012) 1000–1016. URL:https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811912003

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072 2012

  14. [14]

    L. J. O’Donnell, C.-F. Westin, An introduction to diffusion tensor image analysis, Neurosurg Clin N Am 22 (2011) 185–96, viii

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Basser, J

    P. Basser, J. Mattiello, D. Lebihan, Estimation of the effective self- diffusion tensor from the nmr spin echo, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series B 103 (1994) 247–254. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.co m/science/article/pii/S1064186684710375. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1006/jmrb.1994.1037

    work page doi:10.1006/jmrb.1994.1037 1994

  16. [16]

    P. J. Basser, J. Mattiello, D. LeBihan, MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging, Biophys J 66 (1994) 259–267

    work page 1994

  17. [17]

    Kamiya, M

    K. Kamiya, M. Hori, S. Aoki, NODDI in clinical research, J Neurosci Methods 346 (2020) 108908

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Grussu, T

    F. Grussu, T. Schneider, C. Tur, R. L. Yates, M. Tachrount, A. Ianuş, M. C. Yiannakas, J. Newcombe, H. Zhang, D. C. Alexander, G. C. DeLuca, C. A. M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott, Neurite dispersion: a new marker of multiple sclerosis spinal cord pathology?, Ann Clin Transl Neurol 4 (2017) 663–679

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    K. G. Schilling, V. Janve, Y. Gao, I. Stepniewska, B. A. Landman, A. W. Anderson, Histological validation of diffusion mri fiber orientation distributions and dispersion, NeuroImage 165 (2018) 200–221. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811 917308728. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.0 46. 17

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.0 2018

  20. [20]

    Zhang, L

    J. Zhang, L. Li, R. Ji, D. Shang, X. Wen, J. Hu, Y. Wang, D. Wu, L. Zhang, F. He, X. Ye, B. Luo, NODDI identifies cognitive associ- ations with in vivo microstructural changes in remote cortical regions and thalamocortical pathways in thalamic stroke, Transl Stroke Res 16 (2023) 378–391

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    T. D. Parker, C. F. Slattery, J. Zhang, J. M. Nicholas, R. W. Paterson, A. J. M. Foulkes, I. B. Malone, D. L. Thomas, M. Modat, D. M. Cash, S. J. Crutch, D. C. Alexander, S. Ourselin, N. C. Fox, H. Zhang, J. M. Schott, Cortical microstructure in young onset alzheimer’s disease using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging, Hum Brain Mapp 39 (20...

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Penke, S

    L. Penke, S. M. Maniega, C. Murray, A. J. Gow, M. C. Valdés Hernán- dez, J.D.Clayden, J.M.Starr, J.M.Wardlaw, M.E.Bastin, I.J.Deary, Ageneralfactorofbrainwhitematterintegritypredictsinformationpro- cessing speed in healthy older people, Journal of Neuroscience 30 (2010) 7569–7574. URL:https://www.jneurosci.org/content/30/22/7569. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.155...

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1553-10.2010 2010

  23. [23]

    D. C. Van Essen, S. M. Smith, D. M. Barch, T. E. Behrens, E. Yacoub, K. Ugurbil, The wu-minn human connectome project: An overview, NeuroImage 80 (2013) 62–79. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.co m/science/article/pii/S1053811913005351. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041, mapping the Connectome

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041 2013

  24. [24]

    Moeller, E

    S. Moeller, E. Yacoub, C. Olman, E. Auerbach, J. Strupp, N. Harel, K. Ugurbil, Multiband multislice ge-epi at 7 tesla, with 16-fold acceler- ation using partial parallel imaging with application to high spatial and temporal whole-brain fmri, Magn Reson Med 63 (2010) 1144–1153

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    M. F. Glasser, S. N. Sotiropoulos, J. A. Wilson, T. S. Coalson, B. Fischl, J. L. Andersson, J. Xu, S. Jbabdi, M. Webster, J. R. Polimeni, D. C. Van Essen, M. Jenkinson, WU-Minn HCP Consortium, The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the human connectome project, Neuroimage 80 (2013) 105–124

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    S. N. Sotiropoulos, S. Jbabdi, J. Xu, J. L. Andersson, S. Moeller, E. J. Auerbach, M. F. Glasser, M. Hernandez, G. Sapiro, M. Jenkinson, D. A. Feinberg, E. Yacoub, C. Lenglet, D. C. Van Essen, K. Ugurbil, T. E. J. 18 Behrens, WU-Minn HCP Consortium, Advances in diffusion MRI ac- quisition and processing in the human connectome project, Neuroimage 80 (2013...

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    R. P. Cabeen, A. W. Toga, J. M. Allman, Frontoinsular cortical mi- crostructure is linked to life satisfaction in young adulthood, Brain Imaging Behav. 15 (2021) 2775–2789

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    R. P. Cabeen, F. Sepehrband, A. W. Toga, Rapid and accurate noddi parameter estimation with the spherical mean technique, Proc Interna- tional Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2019 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    R. S. Desikan, F. Ségonne, B. Fischl, B. T. Quinn, B. C. Dickerson, D. Blacker, R. L. Buckner, A. M. Dale, R. P. Maguire, B. T. Hyman, M. S. Albert, R. J. Killiany, An automated labeling system for subdivid- ing the human cerebral cortex on mri scans into gyral based regions of interest, NeuroImage 31 (2006) 968 – 980. URL:http://www.scienced irect.com/sc...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 2006

  30. [30]

    Akshoomoff, J

    N. Akshoomoff, J. L. Beaumont, P. J. Bauer, S. S. Dikmen, R. C. Ger- shon, D.Mungas, J.Slotkin, D.Tulsky, S.Weintraub, P.D.Zelazo, R.K. Heaton, Viii. nih toolbox cognition battery (cb): Composite scores of crystallized, fluid, and overall cognition, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 78 (2013) 119–132. URL:https: //srcd.onlinelibr...

    work page doi:10.1111/mono.12038 2013

  31. [31]

    Acosta-Rodriguez, C

    H. Acosta-Rodriguez, C. Yuan, P. Bobba, A. Stephan, T. Zeevi, A. Mal- hotra, A. T. Tran, S. Kaltenhauser, S. Payabvash, Neuroimaging cor- relates of the nih-toolbox-driven cognitive metrics in children, JIN 23 (2024) 217–null. doi:10.31083/j.jin2312217

    work page doi:10.31083/j.jin2312217 2024

  32. [32]

    S. B. Vos, D. K. Jones, M. A. Viergever, A. Leemans, Partial volume effect as a hidden covariate in dti analyses, NeuroImage 55 (2011) 1566–

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage .2011.01.048

    URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pi i/S1053811911000838. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage .2011.01.048

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage 2011

  34. [34]

    M. A. Lindquist, A. Mejia, Zen and the art of multiple comparisons, Psychosom Med 77 (2015) 114–125. 19

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Benjamini, Y

    Y. Benjamini, Y. Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological) 57 (1995) 289–300

    work page 1995

  36. [36]

    X. Yu, S. A. Przybelski, R. I. Reid, T. G. Lesnick, S. Raghavan, J. Graff- Radford, V. J. Lowe, K. Kantarci, D. S. Knopman, R. C. Petersen, C. R. Jack, Jr, P. Vemuri, NODDI in gray matter is a sensitive marker of aging and early AD changes, Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 16 (2024) e12627

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Cabana, G

    J.-F. Cabana, G. Gilbert, L. Létourneau-Guillon, D. Safi, I. Rouleau, P. Cossette, D. K. Nguyen, Effects of syn1q555x mutation on cortical gray matter microstructure, Human Brain Mapping 39 (2018) 3428– 3448. 20

    work page 2018