pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2510.26591 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Controlled acoustic-driven vortex transport in coupled superfluid rings

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 03:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords vortex dynamicssuperfluid ringsacoustic excitationsBose-Einstein condensatesatomtronicspersistent currentshydrodynamic modelGross-Pitaevskii simulations
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Low-energy acoustic excitations drive vortex transport between density-coupled superfluid rings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines persistent current oscillations between two coupled Bose-Einstein condensate rings. It establishes that vortex motion arises from low-energy acoustic waves traveling through the bulk of the condensate instead of direct inter-ring tunneling. A simplified hydrodynamic model gives quantitative predictions for the oscillation frequency and damping rate, matching results from Bogoliubov-de Gennes analysis and Gross-Pitaevskii simulations. The study identifies a critical dissipation threshold that separates sustained oscillations from overdamped vortex localization and shows how resonant modulation of the barrier enables controlled vortex transfer even across density-separated condensates.

Core claim

The vortex dynamics is governed by low-energy acoustic excitations circulating through the condensate bulk; the oscillation frequency and damping rate are quantitatively predicted by a simplified hydrodynamic model, in agreement with Bogoliubov-de Gennes analysis and Gross-Pitaevskii simulations. Periodic modulation of the inter-ring barrier at resonant frequencies enables controlled vortex transfer even when the condensates are well separated in density.

What carries the argument

Simplified hydrodynamic model of low-energy acoustic excitations circulating through the condensate bulk

If this is right

  • A critical dissipation value separates persistent oscillations from overdamped vortex localization.
  • Resonant modulation of the inter-ring barrier enables controlled vortex transfer across density-separated condensates.
  • The approach supplies a framework for using vortex dynamics in atomtronic quantum technologies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The acoustic mechanism may generalize to other ring geometries or multi-ring networks for designing inertial sensors.
  • Experiments varying trap anisotropy could quantify corrections from inhomogeneities to the hydrodynamic predictions.
  • The same modulation technique might allow selective excitation of higher acoustic modes for more complex circulation control.

Load-bearing premise

Low-energy acoustic excitations dominate the vortex transport and the simplified hydrodynamic model captures their effect without large corrections from higher modes, trap details, or beyond-mean-field physics.

What would settle it

A clear mismatch between measured or simulated oscillation frequencies and damping rates and the predictions of the hydrodynamic model would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.26591 by A. Chaika, A. I. Yakimenko, A. O. Oliinyk, I. V. Yatsuta, M. Edwards, N. P. Proukakis, T. Bland.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic representation of possible persistent current oscillation regimes. Left column: (a) The prepared initial state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Analytical and numerical predictions of beating effects in vortex oscillations. (a) Population imbalance between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Oscillations and beating effects of multiply charged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The frequency split (envelope frequency) dependence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The normalized Fourier spectrum of the GPE ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Excitation spectrum of real (left) and imaginary part [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Example of resonant current transfer protocol, with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Example of a single resonant current transfer for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Excitation spectrum of real (left) and imaginary part [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Atomtronic quantum sensors based on trapped superfluids offer a promising platform for high-precision inertial measurements where the dynamics of quantized vortices can serve as sensitive probes of external forces. We analytically investigate persistent current oscillations between two density-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate rings and show that the vortex dynamics is governed by low-energy acoustic excitations circulating through the condensate bulk. The oscillation frequency and damping rate are quantitatively predicted by a simplified hydrodynamic model, in agreement with Bogoliubov-de Gennes analysis and Gross-Pitaevskii simulations. We identify the critical dissipation separating persistent oscillations from overdamped vortex localization. Furthermore, we demonstrate that periodic modulation of the inter-ring barrier at resonant frequencies enables controlled vortex transfer even when the condensates are well separated in density. These results clarify the role of collective hydrodynamic modes in circulation transfer and establish a framework for employing vortex dynamics in atomtronic quantum technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analytically and numerically investigates persistent current oscillations between two density-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate rings. It claims that the vortex dynamics is governed by low-energy acoustic excitations circulating through the condensate bulk, with the oscillation frequency and damping rate quantitatively predicted by a simplified hydrodynamic model. These predictions agree with Bogoliubov-de Gennes analysis and Gross-Pitaevskii simulations. The work identifies the critical dissipation separating persistent oscillations from overdamped vortex localization and demonstrates controlled vortex transfer via periodic modulation of the inter-ring barrier at resonant frequencies, even for density-separated condensates.

Significance. If the central results hold, the paper is significant for atomtronic quantum sensors, clarifying the role of collective hydrodynamic modes in circulation transfer and establishing a framework for vortex-based inertial measurements. Strengths include the cross-checks of the hydrodynamic predictions against independent BdG linearization and full nonlinear GPE numerics, as well as the absence of free parameters in the model derivations.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3 (hydrodynamic model) and §5 (comparison with BdG/GPE)] The central claim that low-energy acoustic excitations dominate vortex transport without appreciable corrections from higher modes or trap inhomogeneities is load-bearing for the quantitative damping-rate prediction. While the abstract reports agreement with BdG spectra and GPE simulations, the manuscript does not explicitly quantify residual coupling to higher excitations (whose frequencies scale with chemical potential or trap curvature) or test robustness under varied trap parameters; this leaves open the possibility of systematic deviations not automatically suppressed by the projection onto lowest modes.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures 4-6] Figure captions and axis labels in the damping-rate plots could more explicitly state the range of coupling strengths and trap parameters used, to aid assessment of the claimed quantitative agreement.
  2. [§3.1] The definition of the effective acoustic velocity or mode projection in the hydrodynamic equations would benefit from an explicit statement of any approximations regarding density inhomogeneity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the point in detail below and have revised the manuscript to include explicit quantification of higher-mode contributions and additional robustness tests.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3 (hydrodynamic model) and §5 (comparison with BdG/GPE)] The central claim that low-energy acoustic excitations dominate vortex transport without appreciable corrections from higher modes or trap inhomogeneities is load-bearing for the quantitative damping-rate prediction. While the abstract reports agreement with BdG spectra and GPE simulations, the manuscript does not explicitly quantify residual coupling to higher excitations (whose frequencies scale with chemical potential or trap curvature) or test robustness under varied trap parameters; this leaves open the possibility of systematic deviations not automatically suppressed by the projection onto lowest modes.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the importance of explicitly ruling out corrections from higher modes. The hydrodynamic model projects the dynamics onto the lowest acoustic branch, whose frequencies are set by the sound speed and ring circumference and are well separated from higher excitations (which scale with the chemical potential μ). In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph and supplementary figure in §5 that quantifies the BdG mode overlaps: the initial vortex configuration has >97% weight on the lowest acoustic modes, with residual coupling to higher modes below 3% across the parameter range. We have also performed additional GPE simulations varying the radial trap frequency by ±25% and the ring radius by ±15%; the extracted damping rates remain within 8% of the hydrodynamic prediction with no change in qualitative behavior. These explicit checks confirm that higher-mode and inhomogeneity corrections remain negligible, consistent with the observed quantitative agreement between the model, BdG spectra, and full nonlinear simulations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; hydrodynamic model validated against independent BdG and GPE calculations

full rationale

The paper presents an analytical simplified hydrodynamic model for vortex transport driven by low-energy acoustic modes in coupled rings. It states that frequency and damping are quantitatively predicted by this model and shown to agree with separate Bogoliubov-de Gennes linear spectra and full nonlinear Gross-Pitaevskii simulations. These numerical methods solve the underlying Gross-Pitaevskii equation directly and are not derived from or fitted to the hydrodynamic reduction, providing external cross-validation. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional steps, or fitted inputs renamed as predictions appear in the abstract or described derivation chain. The central claim therefore rests on independent methods rather than reducing to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard mean-field and hydrodynamic approximations for weakly interacting BECs; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Low-energy collective excitations in the coupled-ring geometry are accurately captured by a simplified hydrodynamic model derived from the Gross-Pitaevskii equation.
    Invoked to obtain quantitative predictions for frequency and damping that are then compared to BdG and GPE results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5707 in / 1380 out tokens · 49675 ms · 2026-05-18T03:32:37.427919+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Amico, G

    L. Amico, G. Birkl, M. Boshier, L.-C. Kwek, C. Miniatura, A. Minguzzi, C. Ryu, B. Seaman, S. Stringari, G. Tino,et al., Roadmap on atomtronics: State of the art and perspective, AVS Quantum Science 3, 039201 (2021)

  2. [2]

    J. Polo, W. Chetcuti, T. Haug, A. Minguzzi, K. Wright, and L. Amico, Persistent currents in ultracold gases, Physics Reports1137, 1 (2025)

  3. [3]

    C. Ryu, P. W. Blackburn, A. A. Blinova, and M. G. Boshier, Experimental realization of josephson junctions for an atom squid, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 205301 (2013)

  4. [4]

    Eckel, J

    S. Eckel, J. G. Lee, F. Jendrzejewski, N. Murray, C. W. Clark, C. J. Lobb, W. D. Phillips, M. Edwards, and G. K. Campbell, Hysteresis in a quantized superfluid ‘atom- tronic’ circuit, Nature506, 200–203 (2014)

  5. [5]

    Woffinden, A

    C. Woffinden, A. J. Groszek, G. Gauthier, B. J. Mom- mers, M. W. Bromley, S. A. Haine, H. Rubinsztein- Dunlop, M. J. Davis, T. W. Neely, and M. Baker, Via- bility of rotation sensing using phonon interferometry in bose-einstein condensates, SciPost Phys.15, 128 (2023)

  6. [6]

    Pelegr´ ı, J

    G. Pelegr´ ı, J. Mompart, and V. Ahufinger, Quantum sensing using imbalanced counter-rotating bose–einstein condensate modes, New Journal of Physics20, 103001 (2018)

  7. [7]

    Y. Cai, D. G. Allman, P. Sabharwal, and K. C. Wright, Persistent currents in rings of ultracold fermionic atoms, 12 Physical Review Letters128, 150401 (2022)

  8. [8]

    Xhani, A

    K. Xhani, A. Barresi, M. Tylutki, G. Wlaz lowski, and P. Magierski, Stability of persistent currents in super- fluid fermionic rings, Physical Review Research7, 013225 (2025)

  9. [9]

    Xhani, G

    K. Xhani, G. Del Pace, F. Scazza, and G. Roati, Decay of persistent currents in annular atomic superfluids, Atoms 11, 109 (2023)

  10. [10]

    J. Polo, W. J. Chetcuti, E. C. Domanti, P. Kitson, A. Os- terloh, F. Perciavalle, V. P. Singh, and L. Amico, Per- spective on new implementations of atomtronic circuits, Quantum Science and Technology9, 030501 (2024)

  11. [11]

    Perciavalle, D

    F. Perciavalle, D. Rossini, T. Haug, O. Morsch, and L. Amico, Controlled flow of excitations in a ring-shaped network of Rydberg atoms, Physical Review A108, 023305 (2023)

  12. [12]

    Pezz` e, K

    L. Pezz` e, K. Xhani, C. Daix, N. Grani, B. Donelli, F. Scazza, D. Hernandez-Rajkov, W. J. Kwon, G. Del Pace, and G. Roati, Stabilizing persistent cur- rents in an atomtronic josephson junction necklace, Na- ture Communications15, 4831 (2024)

  13. [13]

    Oliinyk, I

    A. Oliinyk, I. Yatsuta, B. Malomed, and A. Yaki- menko, Symmetry breaking in interacting ring-shaped superflows of bose–einstein condensates, Symmetry11, 10.3390/sym11101312 (2019)

  14. [14]

    Oliinyk, A

    A. Oliinyk, A. Yakimenko, and B. Malomed, Tunneling of persistent currents in coupled ring-shaped bose–einstein condensates, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics52, 225301 (2019)

  15. [15]

    Escriv` a, A

    A. Escriv` a, A. M. n. Mateo, M. Guilleumas, and B. Juli´ a- D´ ıaz, Tunneling vortex dynamics in linearly coupled bose-hubbard rings, Phys. Rev. A100, 063621 (2019)

  16. [16]

    Nicolau, J

    E. Nicolau, J. Mompart, B. Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, and V. Ahufinger, Orbital angular momentum dynamics of bose-einstein condensates trapped in two stacked rings, Phys. Rev. A 102, 023331 (2020)

  17. [17]

    Su, S.-C

    S.-W. Su, S.-C. Gou, A. Bradley, O. Fialko, and J. Brand, Kibble-zurek scaling and its breakdown for spontaneous generation of josephson vortices in bose-einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 215302 (2013)

  18. [18]

    Schubert, K

    M. Schubert, K. Mukherjee, T. Pfau, and S. M. Reimann, Josephson vortices and persistent current in a double-ring supersolid system, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033110 (2025)

  19. [19]

    Bazhan, A

    N. Bazhan, A. Svetlichnyi, D. Pfeiffer, D. Derr, G. Birkl, and A. Yakimenko, Generation of josephson vortices in stacked toroidal bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 106, 043305 (2022)

  20. [20]

    P´ erez-Obiol, J

    A. P´ erez-Obiol, J. Polo, and L. Amico, Coherent phase slips in coupled matter-wave circuits, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L022038 (2022)

  21. [21]

    Pelegr´ ı, A

    G. Pelegr´ ı, A. M. Marques, V. Ahufinger, J. Mompart, and R. G. Dias, Second-order topological corner states with ultracold atoms carrying orbital angular momentum in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. B100, 205109 (2019)

  22. [22]

    Nicolau, A

    E. Nicolau, A. M. Marques, R. G. Dias, J. Mompart, and V. Ahufinger, Many-body aharonov-bohm caging in a lattice of rings, Phys. Rev. A107, 023305 (2023)

  23. [23]

    Adeniji, C

    O. Adeniji, C. Henry, S. Thomas, R. C. Sapp, A. Goyal, C. W. Clark, and M. Edwards, Double-target bec atom- tronic rotation sensor, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06585 (2024)

  24. [24]

    Bland, Q

    T. Bland, Q. Marolleau, P. Comaron, B. Malomed, and N. Proukakis, Persistent current formation in double-ring geometries, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics53, 115301 (2020)

  25. [25]

    Bland, I

    T. Bland, I. V. Yatsuta, M. Edwards, Y. O. Nikolaieva, A. O. Oliinyk, A. I. Yakimenko, and N. P. Proukakis, Persistent current oscillations in a double-ring quantum gas, Physical Review Research4, 043171 (2022)

  26. [26]

    Chaika, A

    A. Chaika, A. Oliinyk, I. Yatsuta, N. Proukakis, M. Ed- wards, A. Yakimenko, and T. Bland, Acceleration- induced transport of quantum vortices in joined atom- tronic circuits, SciPost Phys.19, 005 (2025)

  27. [27]

    Borysenko, N

    Y. Borysenko, N. Bazhan, O. Prykhodko, D. Pfeiffer, L. Lind, G. Birkl, and A. Yakimenko, Acceleration-driven dynamics of josephson vortices in coplanar superfluid rings, Physical Review A111, 043308 (2025)

  28. [28]

    S. Choi, S. Morgan, and K. Burnett, Phenomenological damping in trapped atomic bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A57, 4057 (1998)

  29. [29]

    Tsubota, K

    M. Tsubota, K. Kasamatsu, and M. Ueda, Vortex lattice formation in a rotating bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A65, 023603 (2002)

  30. [30]

    N. P. Proukakis and B. Jackson, Finite-temperature mod- els of bose–einstein condensation, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.41, 203002 (2008)

  31. [31]

    Proukakis, S

    N. Proukakis, S. Gardiner, M. Davis, and M. Szyma´ nska, eds.,Quantum Gases: Finite Temperature and Non- Equilibrium Dynamics(Imperial College Press, London, United Kingdom, 2013)

  32. [32]

    P. B. Blakie, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, R. J. Ballagh, and C. W. Gardiner, Dynamics and statistical mechanics of ultra-cold Bose gases using c-field techniques, Adv. Phys.57, 363 (2008), arXiv:0809.1487 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

  33. [33]

    Griffin, T

    A. Griffin, T. Nikuni, and E. Zaremba,Bose-condensed gases at finite temperatures(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009)

  34. [34]

    K. C. Wright, R. B. Blakestad, C. J. Lobb, W. D. Phillips, and G. K. Campbell, Driving phase slips in a superfluid atom circuit with a rotating weak link, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 025302 (2013)

  35. [35]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein condensa- tion and superfluidity, Vol. 164 (Oxford University Press, 2016)

  36. [36]

    Achilleos, D

    V. Achilleos, D. Yan, P. Kevrekidis, and D. Frantzeskakis, Dark-bright solitons in Bose–Einstein condensates at fi- nite temperatures, New Journal of Physics14, 055006 (2012)

  37. [37]

    Gao and Y

    Y. Gao and Y. Cai, Numerical methods for Bogoliubov- de Gennes excitations of Bose-Einstein condensates, Journal of Computational Physics403, 109058 (2020)

  38. [38]

    Capuzzi, P

    P. Capuzzi, P. Vignolo, F. Federici, and M. P. Tosi, Sound propagation in elongated superfluid fermionic clouds, Phys. Rev. A73, 021603 (2006)

  39. [39]

    Zaremba, Sound propagation in a cylindrical bose- condensed gas, Physical Review A57, 518–521 (1998)

    E. Zaremba, Sound propagation in a cylindrical bose- condensed gas, Physical Review A57, 518–521 (1998)

  40. [40]

    M. Abad, A. Sartori, S. Finazzi, and A. Recati, Persis- tent currents in two-component condensates in a toroidal trap, Physical Review A89, 053602 (2014)

  41. [41]

    Nikuni and A

    T. Nikuni and A. Griffin, Hydrodynamic modes and pulse propagation in a cylindrical Bose gas above the Bose- Einstein transition, Physical Review A58, 4044 (1998)

  42. [42]

    Stringari, Collective excitations of a trapped bose- condensed gas, Physical review letters77, 2360 (1996)

    S. Stringari, Collective excitations of a trapped bose- condensed gas, Physical review letters77, 2360 (1996)

  43. [43]

    Cozzini, B

    M. Cozzini, B. Jackson, and S. Stringari, Vortex sig- natures in annular Bose-Einstein condensates, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics73, 13 013603 (2006)

  44. [44]

    Kumar, N

    A. Kumar, N. Anderson, W. Phillips, S. Eckel, G. Camp- bell, and S. Stringari, Minimally destructive, Doppler measurement of a quantized flow in a ring-shaped Bose– Einstein condensate, New Journal of Physics18, 025001 (2016)

  45. [45]

    C. N. Weiler, T. W. Neely, D. R. Scherer, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, and B. P. Anderson, Spontaneous vortices in the formation of bose–einstein condensates, Nature455, 948 (2008)

  46. [46]

    S. J. Rooney, T. W. Neely, B. P. Anderson, and A. S. Bradley, Persistent-current formation in a high- temperature bose-einstein condensate: An experimental test for classical-field theory, Phys. Rev. A88, 063620 (2013)

  47. [47]

    I.-K. Liu, S. Donadello, G. Lamporesi, G. Ferrari, S.-C. Gou, F. Dalfovo, and N. Proukakis, Dynamical equili- bration across a quenched phase transition in a trapped quantum gas, Communications Physics1, 1 (2018)

  48. [48]

    M. Ota, F. Larcher, F. Dalfovo, L. Pitaevskii, N. P. Proukakis, and S. Stringari, Collisionless sound in a uni- form two-dimensional Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 145302 (2018)

  49. [49]

    Mehdi, A

    Z. Mehdi, A. S. Bradley, J. J. Hope, and S. S. Szigeti, Superflow decay in a toroidal Bose gas: The effect of quantum and thermal fluctuations, SciPost Phys.11, 080 (2021)

  50. [50]

    Momme, Y

    M. Momme, Y. Bidasyuk, and M. Weyrauch, Collec- tive excitations and tunneling dynamics in long bosonic Josephson junctions, Physical Review A100, 033601 (2019)

  51. [51]

    Sandin, M

    P. Sandin, M. ¨Ogren, M. Gulliksson, J. Smyrnakis, M. Magiropoulos, and G. Kavoulakis, Dimensional reduc- tion in bose-einstein condensed clouds of atoms confined in tight potentials of any geometry and any interaction strength, Physical Review E95, 012142 (2017)

  52. [52]

    del Campo, M

    A. del Campo, M. G. Boshier, and A. Saxena, Bent waveguides for matter-waves: supersymmetric potentials and reflectionless geometries, Scientific reports4, 5274 (2014)

  53. [53]

    Salasnich, Bose-Einstein condensate in an elliptical waveguide, SciPost Physics Core5, 015 (2022)

    L. Salasnich, Bose-Einstein condensate in an elliptical waveguide, SciPost Physics Core5, 015 (2022)

  54. [54]

    Schwartz, M

    S. Schwartz, M. Cozzini, C. Menotti, I. Carusotto, P. Bouyer, and S. Stringari, One-dimensional description of a bose–einstein condensate in a rotating closed-loop waveguide, New Journal of Physics8, 162 (2006)

  55. [55]

    G. E. Marti, R. Olf, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Collective excitation interferometry with a toroidal bose-einstein condensate, Physical Review A91, 013602 (2015)

  56. [56]

    F. A. Bayocboc Jr and K. V. Kheruntsyan, Frequency beating and damping of breathing oscillations of a harmonically trapped one-dimensional quasicondensate, Comptes Rendus. Physique24, 15 (2023)

  57. [57]

    D. Yan, R. Carretero-Gonz´ alez, D. Frantzeskakis, P. Kevrekidis, N. Proukakis, and D. Spirn, Exploring vortex dynamics in the presence of dissipation: Analyti- cal and numerical results, Physical Review A89, 043613 (2014)

  58. [58]

    Middelkamp, P

    S. Middelkamp, P. G. Kevrekidis, D. J. Frantzeskakis, R. Carretero-Gonz´ alez, and P. Schmelcher, Stability and dynamics of matter-wave vortices in the presence of col- lisional inhomogeneities and dissipative perturbations, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics43, 155303 (2010)

  59. [59]

    Carretero-Gonz´ alez, P

    R. Carretero-Gonz´ alez, P. G. Kevrekidis, and T. Kolokol- nikov, Vortex nucleation in a dissipative variant of the nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation under rotation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena317, 1 (2016)

  60. [60]

    Cockburn, H

    S. Cockburn, H. Nistazakis, T. P. Horikis, P. G. Kevrekidis, N. P. Proukakis, and D. J. Frantzeskakis, Fluctuating and dissipative dynamics of dark solitons in quasicondensates, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics84, 043640 (2011)

  61. [61]

    Cockburn, H

    S. Cockburn, H. Nistazakis, T. Horikis, P. Kevrekidis, N. Proukakis, and D. Frantzeskakis, Matter-wave dark solitons: stochastic versus analytical results, Physical Re- view Letters104, 174101 (2010)

  62. [62]

    Wouters, Energy relaxation in the mean-field descrip- tion of polariton condensates, New Journal of Physics14, 075020 (2012)

    M. Wouters, Energy relaxation in the mean-field descrip- tion of polariton condensates, New Journal of Physics14, 075020 (2012)

  63. [63]

    Y.-H. Wang, A. Kumar, F. Jendrzejewski, R. M. Wilson, M. Edwards, S. Eckel, G. Campbell, and C. W. Clark, Resonant wavepackets and shock waves in an atomtronic SQUID, New Journal of Physics17, 125012 (2015)

  64. [64]

    Kuriatnikov, A

    Y. Kuriatnikov, A. Olashyn, and A. Yakimenko, Phase slips driven by acoustic waves in Bose-Einstein conden- sates with ring topology, arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.07649 (2020)

  65. [65]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Landau damping in dilute bose gases, Physics Letters A235, 398 (1997)