Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 44 references

Decentralized Voltage Control of AC Microgrids with Constant Power Loads using Control Barrier Functions

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-18 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A control barrier function yields a nonlinear decentralized law that bounds trajectory errors and enforces voltage constraints in AC microgrids with constant power loads.

desk verdict The paper gives a CBF-based decentralized voltage controller for meshed AC microgrids with time-varying CPLs, backed by analytic tuning rules and stability proofs, though the cascaded modeling step needs extra checks on state dependence. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.02438 v2 submitted 2025-11-04 eess.SY cs.SY

Grigoris Michos , George C. Konstantopoulos This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords decentralizedcontrolvoltageregulationACmicrogridsconstantpowerloadsbarrierfunctionsasymptoticstabilitycascadedsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a decentralized controller for voltage regulation in meshed AC microgrids that have many constant power loads changing over time. The approach models the loads as unknown disturbances and splits the network dynamics into a nominal part without uncertainty and an error part. A control barrier function is used to design a continuous control law with conditions on its parameters that keep the real states close to the ideal ones. The work proves that the closed-loop system is asymptotically stable near an equilibrium and that voltages stay regulated within limits without artificial saturation.

What carries the argument

Control barrier function that generates the continuous-time control law ensuring bounded deviation from the nominal trajectory in the cascaded system.

What would settle it

Observing voltage trajectories that diverge unbounded from the rated value or violate constraints despite the control law being applied with the derived parameter conditions would disprove the stability and regulation claims.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper shows that by reformulating the microgrid model as a cascade of a nominal uncertainty-free subsystem and an error subsystem, and designing a control law via a suitable control barrier function, the distance between true and nominal trajectories remains bounded, the cascaded dynamics are asymptotically stable to an equilibrium set, and the voltages are regulated around the rated value without saturation devices.

Load-bearing premise

The load demand can be accurately represented as a constantly evolving unknown disturbance to enable the cascaded nominal-plus-error structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The voltages converge to a neighborhood of the desired reference vector.
  • The system remains stable under sufficient conditions on the tuning parameters with an estimated region of attraction.
  • Constrained regulation is achieved without using saturation devices or limiters.
  • Bounded operation is maintained for time-varying constant power loads in meshed networks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar barrier-based designs might apply to frequency control or other microgrid objectives.
  • The disturbance modeling could help in handling other uncertainties like renewable generation variations.
  • Real-time hardware-in-the-loop results suggest practical deployability in existing microgrid hardware.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a decentralized nonlinear voltage controller for meshed AC microgrids with time-varying constant power loads. By modeling load demand as a constantly evolving unknown disturbance, the network dynamics are reformulated as a cascaded system consisting of a nominal uncertainty-free subsystem and an error subsystem. A control barrier function is used to derive a continuous-time control law with analytic tuning conditions that bound the distance between true and nominal state trajectories. Under sufficient conditions, asymptotic stability of the cascaded dynamics with respect to an equilibrium set is proven, along with a region-of-attraction estimate. The controller is shown to enforce constrained regulation around a rated voltage without saturation devices. Results are illustrated via simulation and real-time HIL experiments demonstrating bounded operation and convergence.

Significance. If the cascaded modeling and stability arguments hold, the work would provide a meaningful contribution to decentralized voltage control in microgrids by delivering analytic tuning conditions, explicit trajectory bounds, and constraint satisfaction guarantees via CBFs without relying on saturation. The combination of nominal-error separation, region-of-attraction estimate, and HIL validation strengthens the practical relevance for systems with high CPL penetration.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / modeling description] Abstract (modeling paragraph): The reformulation into a cascaded nominal-error structure relies on treating load demand as a purely exogenous, constantly evolving unknown disturbance. For constant power loads the injected current equals P/V, which is a nonlinear function of the local voltage state. This state dependence introduces additional coupling that may prevent an exact separation into uncertainty-free nominal dynamics and an independent error subsystem. The subsequent claims of a bounded distance between true and nominal trajectories (via the CBF) and asymptotic stability of the cascaded system therefore appear to require extra Lipschitz or uniform boundedness assumptions on voltage that are not stated or verified in the modeling step. This assumption is load-bearing for the central bounded-error and stability results.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'analytic conditions on the tuning parameters' are derived and that stability is 'rigorously shown,' yet the provided text does not reference specific theorem or proposition numbers where these derivations appear. Adding explicit cross-references would improve traceability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our work and for the detailed and constructive major comment. We address the point below and propose revisions to strengthen the modeling section.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / modeling description] Abstract (modeling paragraph): The reformulation into a cascaded nominal-error structure relies on treating load demand as a purely exogenous, constantly evolving unknown disturbance. For constant power loads the injected current equals P/V, which is a nonlinear function of the local voltage state. This state dependence introduces additional coupling that may prevent an exact separation into uncertainty-free nominal dynamics and an independent error subsystem. The subsequent claims of a bounded distance between true and nominal trajectories (via the CBF) and asymptotic stability of the cascaded system therefore appear to require extra Lipschitz or uniform boundedness assumptions on voltage that are not stated or verified in the modeling step. This assumption is load-bearing for the central bounded-error and stability results.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's careful scrutiny of the modeling step. The constant-power-load current is indeed i_L = P(t)/V, introducing state dependence. In the manuscript we treat the entire load current as a time-varying exogenous disturbance input (with P(t) unknown and evolving), allowing the network equations to be partitioned exactly into a nominal subsystem (dynamics driven by the control input alone, with zero disturbance) and an error subsystem (whose driving terms include the disturbance and the difference between actual and nominal trajectories). The separation is therefore algebraic and holds without approximation. However, to guarantee that the 1/V nonlinearity remains Lipschitz and to close the bounded-error argument via the CBF, we do rely on voltages remaining in a compact set bounded away from zero. This is a standard and physically justified assumption for AC microgrids; it is implicitly enforced by the CBF constraint that keeps voltages near the rated value. We will explicitly state the voltage boundedness assumption in the revised modeling section, verify that the region-of-attraction estimate is consistent with it, and add a brief Lipschitz argument for the error dynamics. These clarifications do not alter the main theorems but address the referee's concern directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard external theory.

full rationale

The paper models constant-power loads as time-varying disturbances to obtain a cascaded nominal-error structure, then invokes standard control-barrier-function and cascaded-system stability results to bound trajectory distance and prove asymptotic stability. These steps cite established CBF theory and Lyapunov/cascaded-system lemmas rather than reducing any claimed bound or stability result to a parameter fitted inside the paper or to a self-citation whose content is itself unverified. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the analytic conditions on tuning parameters are derived from the external CBF framework and are therefore independent of the paper's own fitted quantities.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the cascaded modelling choice and standard Lyapunov/CBF theory; no new physical entities are introduced and only a small number of tuning parameters appear.

free parameters (1)
  • CBF tuning parameters
    Analytic conditions are derived on these parameters to guarantee bounded error and stability; they are not fitted to data but chosen to satisfy the stated inequalities.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Load demand can be modelled as a constantly evolving unknown disturbance allowing cascaded nominal-error structure
    Invoked in the modelling paragraph of the abstract to enable the subsequent CBF design.
  • standard math Standard CBF and cascaded nonlinear system stability theorems apply
    Used to prove bounded distance and asymptotic stability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Decentralized Voltage Control of AC Microgrids with Constant Power Loads using Control Barrier Functions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2511.02438

@misc{pith2026251102438,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Decentralized Voltage Control of AC Microgrids with Constant Power Loads using Control Barrier Functions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2511.02438}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.02438}
}
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a novel nonlinear decentralized voltage controller for constrained regulation of meshed AC Microgrid networks with high penetration of time-varying constant power loads. Modelling the load demand as a constantly evolving unknown disturbance, the network model is reformulated in a cascaded structure composed of a nominal, \ie uncertainty-free, and an error subsystem. By adopting a suitable control barrier function, we formulate a continuous-time control law and derive analytic conditions on the tuning parameters, such that the distance between the true and the nominal state trajectories is bounded. Under sufficient conditions, we prove asymptotic stability of the cascaded dynamics with respect to an equilibrium set and also provide an estimate of the region of attraction. In addition, it is rigorously shown that the proposed nonlinear control law enforces constrained regulation around a rated voltage value, without the need of saturation devices. The operation of the closed-loop system is illustrated both via simulation and real-time HIL scenarios, demonstrating bounded operation and convergence to a neighbourhood of the desired reference vector.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.02438 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Control diagram of the proposed nodal control law. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Numerical illustration of Lemma 1, for e¯ = 2 V with e¯+ √ e¯ = 3.414 V . Shaded region represents |e| ≤ e V ¯ . considering the states on the boundary of the set, where the respective nodes supply power to the network, i.e. it holds that ∥ei∥ ≥ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of Prop. 1. The “unsafe” region is depicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Single-phase equivalent of the adopted meshed Micro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: HIL setup [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Network true and nominal (dashed) voltage trajectories, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Voltage regulation by conventional droop control. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Injected RMS currents for Nodes (1, 4, 7). HIL 404 device and an interfacing PELab unit from Taraz Technologies, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: CPL Demand for Node 1. 0 2 4 6 0 1 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: CBF values for Node 1. time t = 2s, a nominal reference change occurs with zˆi = {93 97 101 105 109 113 117 121} V , and the network converges to the new equilibrium set. A second reference change happens at t = 4s, where, this time, the provided setpoint to Nodes 1 a…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Control of low-inertia power systems,

    F. D ¨orfler and D. Groß, “Control of low-inertia power systems,”Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 415–445, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Control of parallel connected inverters in standalone ac supply systems,

    M. C. Chandorkar, D. M. Divan, and R. Adapa, “Control of parallel connected inverters in standalone ac supply systems,”IEEE transactions on industry applications, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 136–143, 2002

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    A virtual synchronous machine implementation for distributed control of power converters in smartgrids,

    S. D’Arco, J. A. Suul, and O. B. Fosso, “A virtual synchronous machine implementation for distributed control of power converters in smartgrids,”Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 122, pp. 180–197, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    The effect of transmission-line dynamics on grid-forming dispatchable virtual oscilla- tor control,

    D. Groß, M. Colombino, J.-S. Brouillon, and F. D ¨orfler, “The effect of transmission-line dynamics on grid-forming dispatchable virtual oscilla- tor control,”IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1148–1160, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Distributed direct power sliding-mode control for islanded ac micro- grids,

    C. Alfaro, R. Guzman, L. G. De Vicuna, H. Komurcugil, and H. Martin, “Distributed direct power sliding-mode control for islanded ac micro- grids,”IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 9700–9710, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    A robust control scheme for voltage and reactive power regulation in islanded ac microgrids,

    A. Khan, M. M. Khan, Y . Li, J. Chuanwen, M. U. Shahid, and I. Khan, “A robust control scheme for voltage and reactive power regulation in islanded ac microgrids,”Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 210, p. 108179, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Droop-free distributed control for ac microgrids with precisely regulated voltage variance and admissible voltage profile guarantees,

    S. M. Mohiuddin and J. Qi, “Droop-free distributed control for ac microgrids with precisely regulated voltage variance and admissible voltage profile guarantees,”IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1956–1967, 2019

    work page 1956

  8. [8]

    Understanding small-signal stability of low-inertia systems,

    U. Markovic, O. Stanojev, P. Aristidou, E. Vrettos, D. Callaway, and G. Hug, “Understanding small-signal stability of low-inertia systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 3997–4017, 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Nonlinear stability of complex droop control in converter-based power systems,

    X. He, V . H ¨aberle, I. Suboti ´c, and F. D ¨orfler, “Nonlinear stability of complex droop control in converter-based power systems,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 7, pp. 1327–1332, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    A lyapunov framework for nested dynamical systems on multiple time scales with application to converter-based power systems,

    I. Suboti ´c, D. Groß, M. Colombino, and F. D ¨orfler, “A lyapunov framework for nested dynamical systems on multiple time scales with application to converter-based power systems,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 5909–5924, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Robust two-layer control of dc microgrids with fluctu- ating constant power load demand,

    G. Michos, P. R. Baldivieso-Monasterios, G. C. Konstantopoulos, and P. A. Trodden, “Robust two-layer control of dc microgrids with fluctu- ating constant power load demand,”IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 427–438, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Dynamic tube control for dc microgrids,

    G. Michos, G. C. Konstantopoulos, and P. A. Trodden, “Dynamic tube control for dc microgrids,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    On the voltage stability and network scalability of onboard dc microgrids for hybrid electric aircraft,

    A.-C. Braitor, H. Siguerdidjane, and A. Iovine, “On the voltage stability and network scalability of onboard dc microgrids for hybrid electric aircraft,”IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2024. 12 SUBMITTED FOR PUBLICATION

    2024

  6. [14]

    Adaptive stabilization of uncontrolled rectifier based ac– dc power systems feeding constant power loads,

    K. Areerak, T. Sopapirm, S. Bozhko, C. I. Hill, A. Suyapan, and K. Areerak, “Adaptive stabilization of uncontrolled rectifier based ac– dc power systems feeding constant power loads,”IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 8927–8935, 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    Constant power loads (cpl) with microgrids: Problem defini- tion, stability analysis and compensation techniques,

    M. K. AL-Nussairi, R. Bayindir, S. Padmanaban, L. Mihet-Popa, and P. Siano, “Constant power loads (cpl) with microgrids: Problem defini- tion, stability analysis and compensation techniques,”Energies, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 1656, 2017

    2017

  8. [16]

    Constant power loads in ac distribution systems: An investigation of stability,

    M. Molinas, D. Moltoni, G. Fascendini, J. A. Suul, and T. Undeland, “Constant power loads in ac distribution systems: An investigation of stability,” in2008 IEEE international symposium on industrial electron- ics. IEEE, 2008, pp. 1531–1536

    2008

  9. [17]

    A novel stability criterion of ac power system with constant power load,

    Z. Liu, J. Liu, W. Bao, Y . Zhao, and F. Liu, “A novel stability criterion of ac power system with constant power load,” in2012 Twenty-Seventh Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC). IEEE, 2012, pp. 1946–1950

    2012

  10. [18]

    Investigation on the role of power electronic controlled constant power loads for voltage support in distributed ac systems,

    M. Molinas, D. Moltoni, G. Fascendini, J. Suul, R. Faranda, and T. Undeland, “Investigation on the role of power electronic controlled constant power loads for voltage support in distributed ac systems,” in 2008 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. IEEE, 2008, pp. 3597–3602

    2008

  11. [19]

    Infinity-norm of impedance- based stability criterion for three-phase ac distributed power systems with constant power loads,

    Z. Liu, J. Liu, W. Bao, and Y . Zhao, “Infinity-norm of impedance- based stability criterion for three-phase ac distributed power systems with constant power loads,”IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 3030–3043, 2014

    2014

  12. [20]

    Islanded ac/dc microgrids supervisory control: A novel stochastic optimization ap- proach,

    P. Mansoorhoseini, B. Mozafari, and S. Mohammadi, “Islanded ac/dc microgrids supervisory control: A novel stochastic optimization ap- proach,”Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 209, p. 108028, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Distributed power sharing control for islanded single-/three-phase mi- crogrids with admissible voltage and energy storage constraints,

    J. Zhou, H. Sun, Y . Xu, R. Han, Z. Yi, L. Wang, and J. M. Guerrero, “Distributed power sharing control for islanded single-/three-phase mi- crogrids with admissible voltage and energy storage constraints,”IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 2760–2775, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    K ¨olsch, K

    L. K ¨olsch, K. Wieninger, S. Krebs, and S. Hohmann, “Distributed frequency and voltage control for ac microgrids based on primal- dual gradient dynamics **this work was funded by the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft (dfg, german research foundation)—project number 360464149.”I...

    2020

  15. [23]

    Robust fuzzy model predictive control for voltage regulation in islanded microgrids,

    M. Mottaghizadeh, F. Aminifar, T. Amraee, and M. Sanaye-Pasand, “Robust fuzzy model predictive control for voltage regulation in islanded microgrids,”IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1013–1029, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Novel virtual synchronous generator design with dynamic virtual inertia and bounded frequency, current and voltage characteristics,

    T. E. Kavvathas and G. C. Konstantopoulos, “Novel virtual synchronous generator design with dynamic virtual inertia and bounded frequency, current and voltage characteristics,”IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, pp. 1–14, 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    Control of power converters in ac microgrids,

    J. Rocabert, A. Luna, F. Blaabjerg, and P. Rodriguez, “Control of power converters in ac microgrids,”IEEE transactions on power electronics, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 4734–4749, 2012

    2012

  18. [26]

    Tuning of cascaded controllers for robust grid-forming voltage source converter,

    T. Qoria, F. Gruson, F. Colas, X. Guillaud, M.-S. Debry, and T. Prevost, “Tuning of cascaded controllers for robust grid-forming voltage source converter,” in2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–7

    2018

  19. [27]

    Synchronous instability mechanism of pf droop-controlled voltage source converter caused by current saturation,

    H. Xin, L. Huang, L. Zhang, Z. Wang, and J. Hu, “Synchronous instability mechanism of pf droop-controlled voltage source converter caused by current saturation,”IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 5206–5207, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    Control barrier function based quadratic programs for safety critical systems,

    A. D. Ames, X. Xu, J. W. Grizzle, and P. Tabuada, “Control barrier function based quadratic programs for safety critical systems,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 3861–3876, 2016

    2016

  21. [29]

    Robustness of control barrier functions for safety critical control,

    X. Xu, P. Tabuada, J. W. Grizzle, and A. D. Ames, “Robustness of control barrier functions for safety critical control,”IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 48, no. 27, pp. 54–61, 2015

    2015

  22. [30]

    Fixed-time control of distributed secondary voltage and frequency for microgrids considering state-constrained,

    Z. Wu and H. Cheng, “Fixed-time control of distributed secondary voltage and frequency for microgrids considering state-constrained,” Electrical Engineering, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 2637–2649, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    On resilience guarantees by finite-time robust control barrier functions with application to power inverter networks,

    K. Hassan, D. Selvaratnam, and H. Sandberg, “On resilience guarantees by finite-time robust control barrier functions with application to power inverter networks,”IEEE Open Journal of Control Systems, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Distributed barrier certificates for safe operation of inverter-based microgrids,

    S. Kundu, S. Geng, S. P. Nandanoori, I. A. Hiskens, and K. Kalsi, “Distributed barrier certificates for safe operation of inverter-based microgrids,” in2019 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1042–1047

    2019

  25. [33]

    Unfalsified switching adaptive voltage control for islanded microgrids,

    S. I. Habibi and A. Bidram, “Unfalsified switching adaptive voltage control for islanded microgrids,”IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3394–3407, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    V oltage/frequency regulation with optimal load dispatch in microgrids using smc based distributed cooperative control,

    S. Ullah, L. Khan, I. Sami, and J. Ro, “V oltage/frequency regulation with optimal load dispatch in microgrids using smc based distributed cooperative control,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 64 873–64 889, 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    The theorems of bony and brezis on flow-invariant sets,

    R. Redheffer, “The theorems of bony and brezis on flow-invariant sets,” The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 740–747, 1972

    1972

  28. [36]

    V oltage controlled current source inverters,

    J. Espinoza, G. Joos, and P. Ziogas, “V oltage controlled current source inverters,” inProceedings of the 1992 International Conference on In- dustrial Electronics, Control, Instrumentation, and Automation. IEEE, 1992, pp. 512–517

    1992

  29. [37]

    H. K. Khalil and J. W. Grizzle,Nonlinear systems. Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002, vol. 3

    2002

  30. [38]

    Constrained control for microgrids with constant power loads,

    P. R. Baldivieso-Monasterios and G. C. Konstantopoulos, “Constrained control for microgrids with constant power loads,” in2020 59th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, 2020, pp. 3341– 3346

    2020

  31. [39]

    Extended-optimal- power-flow-based hierarchical control for islanded ac microgrids,

    G. Agundis-Tinajero, N. L. D. Aldana, A. C. Luna, J. Segundo-Ramirez, N. Visairo-Cruz, J. M. Guerrero, and J. C. Vazquez, “Extended-optimal- power-flow-based hierarchical control for islanded ac microgrids,”IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 840–848, 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    Day-ahead op- timal power flow for efficient energy management of urban microgrid,

    J. Arkhangelski, M. Abdou-Tankari, and G. Lefebvre, “Day-ahead op- timal power flow for efficient energy management of urban microgrid,” IEEE transactions on industry applications, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 1285– 1293, 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Control of isolated ac microgrids with constant power loads: A set invariance approach,

    G. Michos, G. C. Konstantopoulos, P. A. Trodden, and V . Kadirka- manathan, “Control of isolated ac microgrids with constant power loads: A set invariance approach,” in2023 31st Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED). IEEE, 2023, pp. 239–244

    2023

  34. [42]

    Axler,Linear algebra done right

    S. Axler,Linear algebra done right. Springer Nature, 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    The quadratic eigenvalue problem,

    F. Tisseur and K. Meerbergen, “The quadratic eigenvalue problem,” SIAM review, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 235–286, 2001

    2001

  36. [44]

    Sepulchre, M

    R. Sepulchre, M. Jankovic, and P. V . Kokotovic,Constructive nonlinear control. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed May 18, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.