Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

A physics-augmented neural network framework for finite strain incompressible viscoelasticity

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a neural-network constitutive model for finite-strain incompressible viscoelasticity that enforces thermodynamics by construction, keeps inelastic flow unimodular, and automatically selects the number of internal viscous

desk verdict Solid theory, credible math, but the extrapolation claims outrun a plane-stress-only validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.02959 v1 pith:AZTTULNW submitted 2025-11-04 cs.CE

Karl A. Kalina , Jörg Brummund , Markus Kästner This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CE MSC 74D1074B2068T07
keywords finitestrainviscoelasticityincompressibilitygeneralizedstandardmaterialsphysics-augmentedneuralnetworksinput-convexexponentialmapintegratorinternalvariableidentificationdata-drivenconstitutivemodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to make learned constitutive models for rubber-like viscoelastic solids that can be trusted outside their training data. It builds the free energy and the dissipation potential as constrained neural networks inside the generalized standard materials framework, so thermodynamic consistency, objectivity, and isotropy hold by construction, and a special projection keeps the inelastic deformation unimodular during evolution. The model is trained directly on deformation–stress histories without prescribing hidden internal variables, using an implicit exponential time integrator, and a gate layer with ℓ_p regularization automatically removes unneeded Maxwell elements; in the examples it reduced five initial elements to two. The authors demonstrate good interpolation and plausible extrapolation on synthetic data and on real acrylic-elastomer uniaxial tests, and show that linearizing the model recovers classical linear viscoelasticity. If the claim holds, data-driven soft-material models can be identified from simple membrane tests while retaining the guarantees of classical continuum mechanics.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a pair of monotonic fully input-convex neural networks (FICNNs) — networks that are convex in their inputs — representing the isochoric free energy and the dual dissipation potential in terms of isotropic invariants. The dissipation potential is built on projected thermodynamic forces that are traceless with respect to the inelastic metric, which keeps the inelastic deformation unimodular throughout the evolution. The evolution equations are integrated with a modified implicit exponential map that preserves both symmetry and unimodularity during Newton iterations. Finally, a trainable gate layer on each Maxwell element, combined with ℓ_p regularization, switches off unused e

What would settle it

Train a PANN exactly as in the paper (uniaxial and equibiaxial plane-stress histories), then run a triaxial test — or a ground-truth simulation — with a prescribed nonzero out-of-plane stretch and compare the predicted full stress tensor, especially the out-of-plane component. If the error is large, the plane-stress-to-3D transfer at the heart of the claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a single physics-augmented neural network can represent finite-strain incompressible viscoelasticity with the same structure as a generalized Maxwell model: a multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient into elastic and inelastic parts, an equilibrium energy plus N non-equilibrium energies, and a dual dissipation potential. The authors assert this is the first such model that combines the multiplicative decomposition, enforced unimodularity of the inelastic part during evolution, general neural-network potentials for both energies and dissipation, training with implicit time integration, and automatic determination of the number of internal variables. T

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that potentials identified from plane-stress uniaxial and equibiaxial tests are the true three-dimensional isotropic potentials, because all empirical validation fixes the pressure-like multiplier by requiring P33=0 and never exercises triaxial confined loading.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Constitutive models for soft inelastic solids can be calibrated from load-path data alone, without measuring or prescribing the hidden inelastic deformation.
  • Physics constraints replace data coverage: the model extrapolates to relaxation, higher stretch rates, larger stretches, and multiaxial in-plane loading from simple uniaxial and equibiaxial calibration data.
  • The number of Maxwell elements (internal variables) becomes a trainable quantity; the data decide model complexity, here reducing five initial elements to two.
  • In the small-strain limit the trained model is guaranteed to match classical incompressible linear viscoelasticity, and its initial shear moduli and viscosities can be read off the network weights.
  • Because the evolution equations are solved implicitly and differentiated through, the same training pipeline applies to arbitrary in-plane deformation histories, not just special load paths.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the paper's empirical validation is confined to plane stress, where the pressure-like multiplier is fixed by requiring the out-of-plane stress to vanish; whether the identified potentials are the true three-dimensional isotropic potentials is untested, so a triaxial confined-loading test would be the decisive next experiment.
  • Editorial inference: the same gating-plus-ℓ_p-regularization strategy could serve as a model-selection tool in other generalized-standard-material settings, such as elastoplasticity or coupled multi-physics problems, whenever only stress–deformation histories are available.
  • Editorial inference: because the small-strain limit gives explicit formulas for initial moduli and viscosities from network weights, a trained PANN could seed or initialize classical phenomenological models, making the neural-network stage an adaptive identification step rather than a black box.
  • Editorial inference: the convexity proof covers a functional basis rather than a minimal integrity basis for the dissipation invariants; alternative invariant sets with the same convexity guarantee might be less redundant and worth exploring for larger networks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a physics-augmented neural network (PANN) framework for finite-strain incompressible viscoelasticity within the generalized standard materials (GSM) setting. A multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient is used, and a specific projection of the thermodynamic forces is introduced to keep the inelastic right Cauchy–Green tensors unimodular during evolution (Theorem 2). The free energy and dual dissipation potential are represented by monotonic fully input-convex neural networks (FICNNs) built on isotropic invariants, guaranteeing thermodynamic consistency, objectivity, and material symmetry by construction. A modified exponential map integrator is proposed and proved exact for constant coefficient tensors while preserving symmetry and unimodularity. Training is performed without prescribing internal variables by differentiating through the implicit time integrator, and a gate layer with ℓ_p regularization automatically prunes unused Maxwell elements. The model is calibrated on synthetic data and on two experimental datasets (VHB 4905 and VHB 4910), with held-out paths used to assess interpolation and extrapolation. The paper also derives the reduction to linear viscoelasticity at small strains.

Significance. If the claims hold, the framework is a meaningful advance in data-driven constitutive modeling: it combines several desirable properties — finite-strain kinematics, exact incompressibility, thermodynamic consistency by construction, objective and isotropic invariant-based potentials, implicit time integration, and automatic selection of the number of internal variables — in one model. The mathematical core is generally carefully developed: the unimodularity theorem, the symmetry/unimodularity properties of the modified exponential integrator, and the convexity of the chosen mixed invariants are supported by explicit proofs. The linearization to linear viscoelasticity is a genuine derivation, not a fitted result. The empirical study includes genuinely held-out load paths, which is a real strength over models evaluated only on calibration data. The main weaknesses are the narrow scope of the experimental validation — all examples are plane-stress membrane states — and some ambiguity in the claim of automatically determining the number of internal variables, since the synthetic ground truth has three Maxwell elements while the trained model retains only two. The paper is suitable for

major comments (2)
  1. [§4, Eqs. (45)–(46)] All empirical validation is performed under the plane-stress closure: F33 is fixed by incompressibility and the pressure-like multiplier is determined from P33=0. This applies also to the multiaxial random walk in Fig. 10, which is still a membrane state with rotations in the 1–2 plane. Consequently, the trained potentials are probed only on the lower-dimensional plane-stress slice of the full three-dimensional invariant domain. The abstract's claim of 'accurate extrapolation behavior' and the contribution statement regarding 'multiaxial deformation states' are therefore demonstrated only within this plane-stress manifold. If the potentials identified from uniaxial/equibiaxial plane-stress data are not the true three-dimensional isotropic potentials, the model would not be predictive under triaxial confined loading or out-of-plane shear. I recommend either adding a synthetic triaxial/con
  2. [§4.1.3, Table 1] The synthetic ground-truth model has three Maxwell elements, but the trained PANN retains only two active Maxwell elements after gate regularization. This discrepancy is not discussed. It may indicate that two nonlinear Maxwell elements suffice for the considered data, in which case the 'automatic determination of the number of internal variables' should be framed as data-driven model selection rather than recovery of the generating model. If the intended claim is stronger, the gate threshold or the gate-loss weight should be revisited in the synthetic example. As written, this is a gap between a stated contribution and the reported empirical result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [General] Several references to the Newton–Raphson algorithm appear as 'Alg. ??'; the algorithm numbering must be fixed.
  2. [Eq. (48)] The normalization factor n_P is not typeset clearly; please clarify whether the denominator is (1/32) times the squared maximum stress or another quantity.
  3. [Figs. 7–12] The comparisons are qualitative. Adding quantitative error measures (e.g., normalized root-mean-square error for calibration and test paths) would make the 'excellent agreement' claims more precise.
  4. [§2.2.3 and Eq. (31)] The derivation of the projected thermodynamic force and the resulting evolution equation is terse. A short index-based derivation of ∂φ*/∂A from Eq. (17) would help readers avoid ambiguity about the contraction order.
  5. [Appendix C] The active-gate criterion in Fig. 13 ('g_α > 0') is inconsistent with the threshold 1e-2 used for switching gates off in §3.3. This should be aligned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: held-out test paths are genuine predictions and the linearization is a mathematical reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The free energy and dual dissipation potentials are explicit FICNN ansatze; stresses follow from them by the Coleman-Noll procedure, the evolution equations follow from the convex dual dissipation potential, and the implicit exponential integrator is proven in the appendices. Training minimizes a stress residual while solving the evolution equations inside the optimizer, and internal variables are never prescribed. The held-out uniaxial, relaxation, rate/stretch-extrapolation, and multiaxial random-walk paths are not used in the loss, so their agreement is a genuine prediction rather than a refit. The reduction to linear viscoelasticity is a Taylor-expansion identity (Eqs. 22-30), not a fitted result. Reading the initial moduli and relaxation times from calibration data is only an initialization (Remark 8) and is subsequently optimized, so it is not a 'prediction' renamed as a result. Several auxiliary properties are borrowed from prior work by the same group ([21], [45], [59], [77], [91])—e.g., zero stress at identity, monotonic FICNN corrections, and the gate layer—but these are parameter-free architecture facts, not uniqueness claims, and they do not by themselves determine the calibrated stress responses; Appendix A proves the convexity needed for thermodynamic consistency. The main caveats are evidentiary rather than circular: all experimental validation uses plane-stress membrane states (Eqs. 45-46), Appendix C reports best-of-five training runs, and Remark 12 notes scatter-limited accuracy for VHB 4910 at lambda_max = 2.5. These limit the strength of the generalization claims but do not make any result equal to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central model is a GSM network whose potentials are neural networks; the scientific content lies in the architecture constraints. Free parameters are the NN weights and gate variables plus regularization hyperparameters tuned on the same data. Assumptions are standard in finite viscoelasticity but are invoked rather than derived. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • FICNN weights and biases (θ_eq, θ_neq, θ_φ*) = not reported
    Network parameters for the equilibrium energy, non-equilibrium energies, and dual dissipation potential are fit to stress data via SLSQP.
  • Gate variables θ_gate (5 initial Maxwell elements) = not reported
    Trainable gate variables determine which Maxwell elements survive; trained with ℓp regularization.
  • w_gate = 5e-3
    Weight of the gate regularization loss, tuned in Appendix C as a trade-off between prediction loss and sparsity.
  • Initial shear modulus μ_av = μ_data/6
    Initialized from the initial slope of the calibration data (Remark 8), affecting the starting point of training.
  • Initial relaxation times ξτ_PANN = (5,10,20,40,80) s
    Data-informed initialization of the relaxation spectrum before training (Remark 8 and Section 4).
  • Gate/regularization hyperparameters γ, ε, δ, p = 1.025, 2.5, 1e-6, 1/4
    Chosen by hand following previous work; they control gate behavior and model sparsity.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The free energy splits into equilibrium and non-equilibrium parts depending only on isochoric invariants of the deformation and inelastic deformation.
    Sect. 2.2.2. This is standard for incompressible finite viscoelasticity but is assumed, not derived.
  • domain assumption Incompressibility J=1 and multiplicative decomposition F=F_e·F_i with a unimodular inelastic part.
    Sect. 2.2.1. The entire framework is built on this kinematic split.
  • domain assumption Generalized standard materials with a convex dual dissipation potential are sufficient for thermodynamic consistency.
    Sect. 2.2.3. The paper notes this is sufficient, not necessary.
  • domain assumption The material is isotropic, so potentials can be expressed in complete invariant sets.
    Sect. 2.2.3 and Eq. (21). Anisotropy is out of scope.
  • domain assumption Plane stress is used to fix the pressure-like Lagrange multiplier p̃.
    Sect. 3.2, Eqs. (45)-(46). All experiments and predictions are interpreted under this closure.
  • domain assumption Monotonic FICNNs can represent the required potentials with sufficient accuracy.
    Sect. 3.1.1-3.1.2. The authors rely on the representational power of convex monotone networks; they mention PICNNs as a more flexible alternative in Remark 7.
  • domain assumption The exponential integrator treats H as constant within a time step.
    Sect. 2.4 and Appendix B. This is a standard numerical integrator assumption for the evolution ODEs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A physics-augmented neural network framework for finite strain incompressible viscoelasticity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AZTTULNW

@misc{pith2026251102959,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A physics-augmented neural network framework for finite strain incompressible viscoelasticity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AZTTULNW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.02959}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a physics-augmented neural network (PANN) framework for finite strain incompressible viscoelasticity within the generalized standard materials theory. The formulation is based on the multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient and enforces unimodularity of the inelastic deformation part throughout the evolution. Invariant-based representations of the free energy and the dual dissipation potential by monotonic and fully input-convex neural networks ensure thermodynamic consistency, objectivity, and material symmetry by construction. The evolution of the internal variables during training is handled by solving the evolution equations using an implicit exponential time integrator. In addition, a trainable gate layer combined with lp regularization automatically identifies the required number of internal variables during training. The PANN is calibrated with synthetic and experimental data, showing excellent agreement for a wide range of deformation rates and different load paths. We also show that the proposed model achieves excellent interpolation as well as plausible and accurate extrapolation behaviors. In addition, we demonstrate consistency of the PANN with linear viscoelasticity by linearization of the full model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.02959 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Visualization of fictitious intermediate configurations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rheological model of an incompressible generalized Maxwell model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Neural network-based potential 𝜓 eq,PANN for the description of the free energy equilibrium part of the finite strain viscoelastic PANN. A monotonic FICNN with skip connections is used, where the network inputs are the invariants I eq = ( ¯𝐼1, ¯𝐼2) of the isochoric right Cauchy-Green deformation 𝑪¯ . The correction term 𝜓 NN(I eq) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Neural network-based potential 𝜉𝜓 neq,PANN for the description of the 𝜉th free energy non-equilibrium part of the finite strain viscoelastic PANN. A monotonic FICNN with skip connections is used, where the network inputs are the invariants 𝜉I neq = ( 𝜉 ¯𝐼 e 1 , 𝜉 ¯𝐼 e …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Neural network-based potential 𝜉𝜙 ∗,PANN for the description of the 𝜉th dual dissipation potential of the finite strain viscoelastic PANN. A monotonic FICNN with skip connections is used, where the network inputs are mixed isotropic invariants 𝜉I 𝜙 ∗ = ( 𝜉𝐼 𝜙 ∗ 1 , 𝜉𝐼 …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic representation of the training process using the constrained optimization problem given in Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Stress responses of the trained PANN model compared to the ground truth model for the three calibration paths: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Stress responses of the trained PANN model compared to the ground truth model for two interpolation test scenarios: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Stress responses of the trained PANN model compared to the ground truth model for two uniaxial loading-unloading test [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Stress responses of the trained PANN model compared to the ground truth model for a multiaxial random walk [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Results of the trained viscoelastic PANN for experimental uniaxial loading-unloading data of VHB 4905 at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Results of the trained viscoelastic PANN for experimental uniaxial loading-unloading data of VHB 4910 from [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Variation of the weight 𝑤 gate for the gate loss term ℒgate: (a) synthetic data set and (b) VHB 4905. The prediction losses are the MSEs of the stresses. The results of the best run out of 5 training runs are shown. have been used for all three NNs (𝜓 NN and 𝜉𝜓 NN wit…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A hierarchy of thermodynamics learning frameworks for inelastic constitutive modeling

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    With identical neural building blocks, dissipation-potential, GSM, and metriplectic models all learn accurate inelastic stress responses; performance differences are modest and dataset-dependent.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997

    Miroslav Šilhavý.The Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Continuous Media. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997. ISBN 978-3-642-08204-7 978-3-662-03389-0. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03389-0

    doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03389-0 1997

  2. [2]

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

    Peter Haupt.Continuum Mechanics and Theory of Materials. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

  3. [3]

    Holzapfel.Nonlinear Solid Mechanics - A Continuum Approach for Engineering

    Gerhard A. Holzapfel.Nonlinear Solid Mechanics - A Continuum Approach for Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2000. ISBN 978-0-471-82319-3

    2000

  4. [4]

    Neural Networks for Con- stitutive Modeling: From Universal Function Approximators to Advanced Models and the Integration of Physics

    Johannes Dornheim, Lukas Morand, Hemanth Janarthanam Nallani, and Dirk Helm. Neural Networks for Con- stitutive Modeling: From Universal Function Approximators to Advanced Models and the Integration of Physics. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, October 2023. ISSN 1886-1784. doi:10.1007/s11831-023- 10009-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11831-023- 2023

  5. [5]

    Fuhg, Govinda Anantha Padmanabha, Nikolaos Bouklas, Bahador Bahmani, WaiChing Sun, Nikolaos N

    Jan N. Fuhg, Govinda Anantha Padmanabha, Nikolaos Bouklas, Bahador Bahmani, WaiChing Sun, Nikolaos N. Vlassis, Moritz Flaschel, Pietro Carrara, and Laura De Lorenzis. A Review on Data-Driven Constitutive Laws for Solids.Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, November 2024. ISSN 1886-1784. doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10196-2

    doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10196-2 2024

  6. [6]

    Ghaboussi, J

    J. Ghaboussi, J. H. Garrett, and X. Wu. Knowledge-Based Modeling of Material Behavior with Neu- ral Networks.Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 117(1):132–153, 1991. ISSN 0733-9399, 1943-7889. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:1(132)

    doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1991)117:1(132 1991

  7. [7]

    Frankel, Reese E

    Ari L. Frankel, Reese E. Jones, and Laura P. Swiler. Tensor Basis Gaussian Process Models of Hyperelastic Materials.Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and Computing, 1(1), 2020. ISSN 2689-3967, 2689-3975. doi:10.1615/.2020033325. 27 A physics-augmented neural network framework for finite strain incompressible viscoelasticityA PREPRINT

    work page doi:10.1615/.2020033325 2020

  8. [8]

    Nathan Ellmer, Rogelio Ortigosa, Jesús Martínez-Frutos, and Antonio J. Gil. Gradient enhanced gaussian process regression for constitutive modelling in finite strain hyperelasticity.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 418:116547, January 2024. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116547

    arXiv 2024

Show all 110 references
  1. [9]

    Versatile data-adaptive hyperelastic energy functions for soft materials.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 430:117208, October 2024

    Simon Wiesheier, Miguel Angel Moreno-Mateos, and Paul Steinmann. Versatile data-adaptive hyperelastic energy functions for soft materials.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 430:117208, October 2024. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117208

    2024

  2. [10]

    Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 381:113852, August 2021

    Moritz Flaschel, Siddhant Kumar, and Laura De Lorenzis. Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 381:113852, August 2021. ISSN 00457825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2021.113852

    2021

  3. [11]

    Automated discovery of generalized standard material models with EUCLID.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 405:115867, February 2023

    Moritz Flaschel, Siddhant Kumar, and Laura De Lorenzis. Automated discovery of generalized standard material models with EUCLID.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 405:115867, February 2023. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115867

    2023

  4. [12]

    Thermodynamically consistent neural network plasticity modeling and discovery of evolution laws.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 180:105416, November 2023

    Knut Andreas Meyer and Fredrik Ekre. Thermodynamically consistent neural network plasticity modeling and discovery of evolution laws.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 180:105416, November 2023. ISSN 0022-5096. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2023.105416

    2023

  5. [13]

    Automatic generation of interpretable hyperelastic material models by symbolic regression.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 124(9): 2093–2104, 2023

    Rasul Abdusalamov, Markus Hillgärtner, and Mikhail Itskov. Automatic generation of interpretable hyperelastic material models by symbolic regression.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 124(9): 2093–2104, 2023. ISSN 1097-0207. doi:10.1002/nme.7203

    doi

  6. [14]

    Bock, Roland C

    Frederic E. Bock, Roland C. Aydin, Christian J. Cyron, Norbert Huber, Surya R. Kalidindi, and Benjamin Klusemann. A Review of the Application of Machine Learning and Data Mining Approaches in Continuum Materials Mechanics.Frontiers in Materials, 6:110, May 2019. ISSN 2296-8016...

    2019

  7. [15]

    A review of artificial neural networks in the constitutive modeling of composite materials.Composites Part B: Engineering, 224:109152, November 2021

    Xin Liu, Su Tian, Fei Tao, and Wenbin Yu. A review of artificial neural networks in the constitutive modeling of composite materials.Composites Part B: Engineering, 224:109152, November 2021. ISSN 13598368. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109152

    2021

  8. [16]

    Raissi, P

    M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G.E. Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations.Journal of Computational Physics, 378:686–707, 2019. ISSN 00219991. doi:10.10...

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Physics informed neural networks for continuum micromechanics.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 393:114790, 2022

    Alexander Henkes, Henning Wessels, and Rolf Mahnken. Physics informed neural networks for continuum micromechanics.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 393:114790, 2022. ISSN 0045-

    2022

  10. [18]

    Kochmann

    Jan-Hendrik Bastek and Dennis M. Kochmann. Physics-Informed Neural Networks for shell struc- tures.European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 97:104849, January 2023. ISSN 0997-7538. doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104849

    2023

  11. [19]

    A mechanics-informed artificial neural network approach in data-driven constitutive modeling.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 123(12): 2738–2759, 2022

    Faisal As’ad, Philip Avery, and Charbel Farhat. A mechanics-informed artificial neural network approach in data-driven constitutive modeling.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 123(12): 2738–2759, 2022. ISSN 1097-0207. doi:10.1002/nme.6957

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    Klein, Rogelio Ortigosa, Jesús Martínez-Frutos, and Oliver Weeger

    Dominik K. Klein, Rogelio Ortigosa, Jesús Martínez-Frutos, and Oliver Weeger. Nonlinear electro-elastic finite element analysis with neural network constitutive models.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 425:116910, May 2024. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cm...

    2024

  13. [21]

    Klein, Karl A

    Lennart Linden, Dominik K. Klein, Karl A. Kalina, Jörg Brummund, Oliver Weeger, and Markus Kästner. Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A guide to enforcing physics.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 179:105363, 2023. ISSN 0022-5096. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2023.105363

    2023

  14. [22]

    Elsayed, Yousef Heider, and Oliver Weeger

    Fadi Aldakheel, Elsayed S. Elsayed, Yousef Heider, and Oliver Weeger. Physics-based machine learning for computational fracture mechanics.Machine Learning for Computational Science and Engineering, 1(1):18, April 2025. ISSN 3005-1436. doi:10.1007/s44379-025-00019-x

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    Physics-based machine learning for fatigue lifetime prediction under non-uniform loading scenarios.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 444:118116, September 2025

    Abedulgader Baktheer and Fadi Aldakheel. Physics-based machine learning for fatigue lifetime prediction under non-uniform loading scenarios.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 444:118116, September 2025. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2025.118116

    2025

  16. [24]

    Kalina, Lennart Linden, Jörg Brummund, and Markus Kästner

    Karl A. Kalina, Lennart Linden, Jörg Brummund, and Markus Kästner. FE ANN: An efficient data-driven multiscale approach based on physics-constrained neural networks and automated data mining.Computational Mechanics, 71:827, 2023. ISSN 1432-0924. doi:10.1007/s00466-022-02260-0

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Thermodynamics-based Artificial Neural Networks for constitutive modeling.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 147:104277, 2021

    Filippo Masi, Ioannis Stefanou, Paolo Vannucci, and Victor Maffi-Berthier. Thermodynamics-based Artificial Neural Networks for constitutive modeling.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 147:104277, 2021. ISSN 0022-5096. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104277. 28 A physics-a...

    2021

  18. [26]

    Kalina, Lennart Linden, Jörg Brummund, Philipp Metsch, and Markus Kästner

    Karl A. Kalina, Lennart Linden, Jörg Brummund, Philipp Metsch, and Markus Kästner. Automated constitutive modeling of isotropic hyperelasticity based on artificial neural networks.Computational Mechanics, 69(1): 213–232, 2022. ISSN 1432-0924. doi:10.1007/s00466-021-02090-6

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    Abdolazizi, Roland C

    Kevin Linka, Markus Hillgärtner, Kian P. Abdolazizi, Roland C. Aydin, Mikhail Itskov, and Christian J. Cyron. Constitutive artificial neural networks: A fast and general approach to predictive data-driven consti- tutive modeling by deep learning.Journal of Computational Physic...

    2021

  20. [28]

    Kalina, Jörg Brummund, and Markus Kästner

    Max Rosenkranz, Karl A. Kalina, Jörg Brummund, and Markus Kästner. A comparative study on different neural network architectures to model inelasticity.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, page nme.7319, 2023. ISSN 0029-5981, 1097-0207. doi:10.1002/nme.7319

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    Physically enhanced training for modeling rate-independent plasticity with feedforward neural networks.Computational Mechanics, April 2023

    Patrick Weber, Werner Wagner, and Steffen Freitag. Physically enhanced training for modeling rate-independent plasticity with feedforward neural networks.Computational Mechanics, April 2023. ISSN 1432-0924. doi:10.1007/s00466-023-02316-9

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    Multiscale modeling of viscoelastic shell structures with artificial neural networks.Computational Mechanics, March 2025

    Jeremy Geiger, Werner Wagner, and Steffen Freitag. Multiscale modeling of viscoelastic shell structures with artificial neural networks.Computational Mechanics, March 2025. ISSN 1432-0924. doi:10.1007/s00466-025- 02613-5

    2025 doi

  23. [31]

    Hamel, Kyle Johnson, Reese Jones, and Nikolaos Bouklas

    Jan Niklas Fuhg, Craig M. Hamel, Kyle Johnson, Reese Jones, and Nikolaos Bouklas. Modular machine learning-based elastoplasticity: Generalization in the context of limited data.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 407:115930, 2023. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016...

    2023

  24. [32]

    Neural integration for constitutive equations using small data.Com- puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 420:116698, February 2024

    Filippo Masi and Itai Einav. Neural integration for constitutive equations using small data.Com- puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 420:116698, February 2024. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116698

    2024

  25. [33]

    Klein, Mauricio Fernández, Robert J

    Dominik K. Klein, Mauricio Fernández, Robert J. Martin, Patrizio Neff, and Oliver Weeger. Polyconvex anisotropic hyperelasticity with neural networks.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, page 104703,

  26. [34]

    NN-EUCLID: Deep-learning hyperelasticity without stress data.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 169:105076, 2022

    Prakash Thakolkaran, Akshay Joshi, Yiwen Zheng, Moritz Flaschel, Laura De Lorenzis, and Siddhant Kumar. NN-EUCLID: Deep-learning hyperelasticity without stress data.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 169:105076, 2022. ISSN 0022-5096. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2022.105076

    2022

  27. [35]

    Fuhg, Nikolaos Bouklas, and Reese E

    Jan N. Fuhg, Nikolaos Bouklas, and Reese E. Jones. Learning hyperelastic anisotropy from data via a tensor basis neural network.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 168:105022, 2022. ISSN 00225096. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2022.105022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Benchmarking physics-informed frameworks for data-driven hyperelasticity.Computational Mechanics, 73(1):49–65, January

    Vahidullah Taç, Kevin Linka, Francisco Sahli-Costabal, Ellen Kuhl, and Adrian Buganza Tepole. Benchmarking physics-informed frameworks for data-driven hyperelasticity.Computational Mechanics, 73(1):49–65, January

  29. [37]

    Physics-constrained symbolic model discovery for polyconvex incom- pressible hyperelastic materials.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, n/a(n/a):e7473,

    Bahador Bahmani and WaiChing Sun. Physics-constrained symbolic model discovery for polyconvex incom- pressible hyperelastic materials.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, n/a(n/a):e7473,

  30. [38]

    Antoine Benady, Emmanuel Baranger, and Ludovic Chamoin. NN-mCRE: A modified constitutive rela- tion error framework for unsupervised learning of nonlinear state laws with physics-augmented neural net- works.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 125(8):e74...

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    Hurtado, and Ellen Kuhl

    Mathias Peirlinck, Kevin Linka, Juan A. Hurtado, and Ellen Kuhl. On automated model discovery and a universal material subroutine for hyperelastic materials.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 418: 116534, January 2024. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116534

    2024

  32. [40]

    Sobolev Training for Neural Networks

    Wojciech M Czarnecki, Simon Osindero, Max Jaderberg, Grzegorz Swirszcz, and Razvan Pascanu. Sobolev Training for Neural Networks. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 4278–4287, 2017

    2017

  33. [41]

    Vlassis, Ran Ma, and WaiChing Sun

    Nikolaos N. Vlassis, Ran Ma, and WaiChing Sun. Geometric deep learning for computational mechanics Part I: Anisotropic hyperelasticity.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 371:113299, 2020. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113299

    2020

  34. [42]

    doi:10.1002/nme.7473

    ISSN 1097-0207. doi:10.1002/nme.7473

    doi

  35. [43]

    Polyconvex neural networks for hyperelastic constitutive models: A rectification approach.Mechanics Research Communications, 125:103993, 2022

    Peiyi Chen and Johann Guilleminot. Polyconvex neural networks for hyperelastic constitutive models: A rectification approach.Mechanics Research Communications, 125:103993, 2022. ISSN 00936413. doi:10.1016/j.mechrescom.2022.103993

    2022

  36. [44]

    Jadoon, Karl A

    Asghar A. Jadoon, Karl A. Kalina, Manuel K. Rausch, Reese Jones, and Jan Niklas Fuhg. Inverse design of anisotropic microstructures using physics-augmented neural networks.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 203:106161, October 2025. ISSN 0022-5096. doi:10.1016/j.j...

    2025

  37. [45]

    Kalina, and Markus Kästner

    Franz Dammaß, Karl A. Kalina, and Markus Kästner. When invariants matter: The role of I1 and I2 in neural network models of incompressible hyperelasticity.Mechanics of Materials, 210:105443, November 2025. ISSN 0167-6636. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2025.105443

    2025

  38. [46]

    Kalina, Philipp Gebhart, Jörg Brummund, Lennart Linden, WaiChing Sun, and Markus Kästner

    Karl A. Kalina, Philipp Gebhart, Jörg Brummund, Lennart Linden, WaiChing Sun, and Markus Kästner. Neural network-based multiscale modeling of finite strain magneto-elasticity with relaxed convexity crite- ria.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 421:116739, M...

    2024

  39. [47]

    Vahidullah Tac, Francisco Sahli Costabal, and Adrian B. Tepole. Data-driven tissue mechanics with polyconvex neural ordinary differential equations.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 398:115248,

  40. [48]

    Number 516 in CISM Courses and Lectures

    Jörg Schröder, Patrizio Neff, and International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, editors.Poly-, Quasi- and Rank-One Convexity in Applied Mechanics: CISM Course on Poly-, Quasi- and Rank-One Convexity in Applied Mechanics, Held in Udine from September 24 to September 28, 2007. N...

    2007

  41. [49]

    Zico Kolter

    Brandon Amos, Lei Xu, and J. Zico Kolter. Input Convex Neural Networks. InProceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 146–155. PMLR, 2017

    2017

  42. [50]

    Klein, Mokarram Hossain, Konstantin Kikinov, Maximilian Kannapinn, Stephan Rudykh, and Antonio J

    Dominik K. Klein, Mokarram Hossain, Konstantin Kikinov, Maximilian Kannapinn, Stephan Rudykh, and Antonio J. Gil. Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A monotonic approach.European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 116:105900, March 2026. ISSN 0997-7538. doi:10.1016/j.euromech...

    2026

  43. [51]

    Russ, Glaucio H

    Harikrishnan Vijayakumaran, Jonathan B. Russ, Glaucio H. Paulino, and Miguel A. Bessa. Consistent machine learning for topology optimization with microstructure-dependent neural network material models.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 196:106015, March 2025. ISS...

    2025

  44. [52]

    Gian-Luca Geuken, Patrick Kurzeja, David Wiedemann, and Jörn Mosler. A novel neural network for isotropic polyconvex hyperelasticity satisfying the universal approximation theorem.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 203:106209, October 2025. ISSN 0022-5096. doi:10....

    2025

  45. [53]

    PhD thesis, Inst

    Vera Ebbing.Design of polyconvex energy functions for all anisotropy classes. PhD thesis, Inst. für Mechanik, Abt. Bauwissenschaften, Essen, 2010

    2010

  46. [54]

    A Hybrid Approach Employing Neural Networks to Simulate the Elasto-Plastic Deformation Behavior of 3D-Foam Structures.Advanced Engineering Materials, n/a(n/a):2100641, 2021

    Alexander Malik, Martin Abendroth, Geralf Hütter, and Bjoern Kiefer. A Hybrid Approach Employing Neural Networks to Simulate the Elasto-Plastic Deformation Behavior of 3D-Foam Structures.Advanced Engineering Materials, n/a(n/a):2100641, 2021. ISSN 1527-2648. doi:10.1002/adem.202100641

    2021 doi

  47. [55]

    Filippo Masi and Ioannis Stefanou. Multiscale modeling of inelastic materials with Thermodynamics-based Artificial Neural Networks (TANN).Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 398:115190, August 2022. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115190

    2022

  48. [56]

    Accounting for plasticity: An extension of inelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks, July 2024

    Birte Boes, Jaan-Willem Simon, and Hagen Holthusen. Accounting for plasticity: An extension of inelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks, July 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    Automated model discovery of finite strain elastoplasticity from uniaxial experiments.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 435: 117653, February 2025

    Asghar Arshad Jadoon, Knut Andreas Meyer, and Jan Niklas Fuhg. Automated model discovery of finite strain elastoplasticity from uniaxial experiments.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 435: 117653, February 2025. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117653

    2025

  50. [58]

    Shenglin Huang, Zequn He, Bryan Chem, and Celia Reina. Variational Onsager Neural Networks (VONNs): A thermodynamics-based variational learning strategy for non-equilibrium PDEs.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 163:104856, June 2022. ISSN 0022-5096. doi:10.1016/...

    2022

  51. [59]

    Vlassis and WaiChing Sun

    Nikolaos N. Vlassis and WaiChing Sun. Sobolev training of thermodynamic-informed neural networks for interpretable elasto-plasticity models with level set hardening.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 377:113695, 2021. ISSN 00457825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2021.113695

    2021

  52. [60]

    Convex neural networks learn generalized standard material models.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 200:106103, July 2025

    Moritz Flaschel, Paul Steinmann, Laura De Lorenzis, and Ellen Kuhl. Convex neural networks learn generalized standard material models.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 200:106103, July 2025. ISSN 0022-5096. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106103. 30 A physics-augmented n...

    2025

  53. [61]

    Rausch, Francisco Sahli Costabal, and Adrian Buganza Tepole

    Vahidullah Taç, Manuel K. Rausch, Francisco Sahli Costabal, and Adrian Buganza Tepole. Data-driven anisotropic finite viscoelasticity using neural ordinary differential equations.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 411:116046, June 2023. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:...

    2023

  54. [62]

    Theory and implementation of inelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 428:117063, August 2024

    Hagen Holthusen, Lukas Lamm, Tim Brepols, Stefanie Reese, and Ellen Kuhl. Theory and implementation of inelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 428:117063, August 2024. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117063

    2024

  55. [63]

    Polyconvex inelastic constitutive artificial neural networks.PAMM, 24(3):e202400032, 2024

    Hagen Holthusen, Lukas Lamm, Tim Brepols, Stefanie Reese, and Ellen Kuhl. Polyconvex inelastic constitutive artificial neural networks.PAMM, 24(3):e202400032, 2024. ISSN 1617-7061. doi:10.1002/pamm.202400032

    2024 doi

  56. [64]

    Hagen Holthusen, Kevin Linka, Ellen Kuhl, and Tim Brepols. A generalized dual potential for inelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks: A JAX implementation at finite strains.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 206:106337, January 2026. ISSN 0022-5096. doi:1...

    2026

  57. [65]

    Kalina, Jörg Brummund, WaiChing Sun, and Markus Kästner

    Max Rosenkranz, Karl A. Kalina, Jörg Brummund, WaiChing Sun, and Markus Kästner. Viscoelasticty with physics-augmented neural networks: Model formulation and training methods without prescribed internal variables.Computational Mechanics, May 2024. ISSN 1432-0924. doi:10.1007/s...

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    Abdolazizi, Kevin Linka, and Christian J

    Kian P. Abdolazizi, Kevin Linka, and Christian J. Cyron. Viscoelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks (vCANNs) – a framework for data-driven anisotropic nonlinear finite viscoelasticity.Journal of Computational Physics, page 112704, December 2023. ISSN 0021-9991. doi:1...

    2023

  59. [67]

    Enhancing nonlinear viscoelastic modeling of elastomers through neural networks: A deep rheological element.Mechanics of Materials, 212:105525, January 2026

    Federico Califano and Jacopo Ciambella. Enhancing nonlinear viscoelastic modeling of elastomers through neural networks: A deep rheological element.Mechanics of Materials, 212:105525, January 2026. ISSN 0167-6636. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2025.105525

    2026

  60. [68]

    A Complement to Neural Networks for Anisotropic Inelasticity at Finite Strains, October 2025

    Hagen Holthusen and Ellen Kuhl. A Complement to Neural Networks for Anisotropic Inelasticity at Finite Strains, October 2025

    2025

  61. [69]

    Thermodynamic relations for high elastic materials.Transactions of the Faraday Society, 57:829–838, 1961

    PJ Flory. Thermodynamic relations for high elastic materials.Transactions of the Faraday Society, 57:829–838, 1961

    1961

  62. [70]

    Yuki Yamakawa, Koichi Hashiguchi, Tomohiro Sasaki, Masaki Higuchi, Kiyoshi Sato, Tadashi Kawai, Tomohiro Machishima, and Takuya Iguchi. Anisotropic subloading surface Cam-clay plasticity model with rotational hardening: Deformation gradient-based formulation for finite strain....

    2021 doi

  63. [71]

    A mechanics-informed neural network framework for data-driven nonlinear viscoelasticity.AIAA SCITECH 2023 forum, 2023

    Faisal As’ad and Charbel Farhat. A mechanics-informed neural network framework for data-driven nonlinear viscoelasticity.AIAA SCITECH 2023 forum, 2023. doi:DOI: 10.2514/6.2023-0949

    2023 doi

  64. [72]

    A theory of finite viscoelasticity and numerical aspects.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 35(26-27):3455–3482, September 1998

    Stefanie Reese and Sanjay Govindjee. A theory of finite viscoelasticity and numerical aspects.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 35(26-27):3455–3482, September 1998. ISSN 00207683. doi:10.1016/S0020- 7683(97)00217-5

    1998 doi

  65. [73]

    J. S. Bergström and M. C. Boyce. Constitutive modeling of the large strain time-dependent behavior of elastomers.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 46(5):931–954, May 1998. ISSN 0022-5096. doi:10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00075-6

    1998 doi

  66. [74]

    On the two-potential constitutive modeling of rubber vis- coelastic materials.Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 344(2):102–112, February 2016

    Aditya Kumar and Oscar Lopez-Pamies. On the two-potential constitutive modeling of rubber vis- coelastic materials.Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 344(2):102–112, February 2016. ISSN 1631-0721. doi:10.1016/j.crme.2015.11.004

    2016 doi

  67. [75]

    Rambausek, D

    M. Rambausek, D. Mukherjee, and K. Danas. A computational framework for magnetically hard and soft viscoelastic magnetorheological elastomers.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 391: 114500, 2022. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2021.114500

    2022

  68. [76]

    Anisotropic evolution of viscous strain in soft biological materials.Mechanics of Materials, 192:104976, May 2024

    Jacopo Ciambella, Giulio Lucci, and Paola Nardinocchi. Anisotropic evolution of viscous strain in soft biological materials.Mechanics of Materials, 192:104976, May 2024. ISSN 0167-6636. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2024.104976

    2024

  69. [77]

    Patrick Le Tallec, Christophe Rahier, and Ahmed Kaiss. Three-dimensional incompressible viscoelasticity in large strains: Formulation and numerical approximation.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 109(3):233–258, November 1993. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/0...

    1993 doi

  70. [78]

    Carlo Sansour, Igor Karšaj, and Jurica Sori´c. On a formulation for anisotropic elastoplasticity at finite strains invariant with respect to the intermediate configuration.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 55(11): 2406–2426, November 2007. ISSN 0022-5096. doi:10....

    2007 doi

  71. [79]

    Coleman and Walter Noll

    Bernard D. Coleman and Walter Noll. The thermodynamics of elastic materials with heat conduction and viscosity.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 13(1):167–178, 1963. ISSN 0003-9527. 31 A physics-augmented neural network framework for finite strain incompressible vis...

    1963

  72. [80]

    Coleman and Morton E

    Bernard D. Coleman and Morton E. Gurtin. Thermodynamics with Internal State Variables.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 47(2):597–613, July 1967. ISSN 0021-9606, 1089-7690. doi:10.1063/1.1711937

    1967 doi

  73. [81]

    Christian Miehe, Björn Kiefer, and Daniele Rosato. An incremental variational formulation of dissipative magnetostriction at the macroscopic continuum level.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 48(13): 1846–1866, June 2011. ISSN 00207683. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.02.011

    2011 doi

  74. [82]

    A finite viscoelastic phase-field model for prediction of crack propagation speed in elastomers.European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 113:105678, September 2025

    Jacopo Ciambella, Giovanni Lancioni, and Nico Stortini. A finite viscoelastic phase-field model for prediction of crack propagation speed in elastomers.European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 113:105678, September 2025. ISSN 0997-7538. doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2025.105678

    2025

  75. [83]

    Kalina, and Markus Kästner

    Franz Dammaß, Karl A. Kalina, and Markus Kästner. Neural networks meet phase-field: A hybrid fracture model.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 440:117937, May 2025. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2025.117937

    2025

  76. [84]

    J. Casey. Approximate kinematical relations in plasticity.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 21(7): 671–682, January 1985. ISSN 0020-7683. doi:10.1016/0020-7683(85)90071-X

    1985 doi

  77. [85]

    E. A. de Souza Neto, D. Peri, and D. R. J. Owen.Computational Methods for Plasticity. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, October 2008. ISBN 978-0-470-69462-6 978-0-470-69452-7. doi:10.1002/9780470694626

    2008 doi

  78. [86]

    Nicholas J. Higham. The Scaling and Squaring Method for the Matrix Exponential Revisited.SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 26(4):1179–1193, January 2005. ISSN 0895-4798. doi:10.1137/04061101X

    2005 doi

  79. [87]

    Nicholas J. Higham. Computing real square roots of a real matrix.Linear Algebra and its Applications, 88–89: 405–430, April 1987. ISSN 0024-3795. doi:10.1016/0024-3795(87)90118-2

    1987 doi

  80. [88]

    Klein, Fabian J

    Dominik K. Klein, Fabian J. Roth, Iman Valizadeh, and Oliver Weeger. Parametrized polyconvex hyperelasticity with physics-augmented neural networks.Data-Centric Engineering, 4:e25, January 2023. ISSN 2632-6736. doi:10.1017/dce.2023.21

    2023 doi

  81. [89]

    J. P. Boehler. On Irreducible Representations for Isotropic Scalar Functions.ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 57(6):323–327, 1977. ISSN 1521-4001. doi:10.1002/zamm.19770570608

    1977 doi

  82. [90]

    Polyconvexity of generalized polynomial-type hyperelastic strain energy functions for near-incompressibility.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 40(11):2767–2791, 2003

    Stefan Hartmann and Patrizio Neff. Polyconvexity of generalized polynomial-type hyperelastic strain energy functions for near-incompressibility.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 40(11):2767–2791, 2003. ISSN 00207683. doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00086-6

    2003 doi

  83. [91]

    Kalina, Jörg Brummund, WaiChing Sun, and Markus Kästner

    Karl A. Kalina, Jörg Brummund, WaiChing Sun, and Markus Kästner. Neural networks meet anisotropic hyperelasticity: A framework based on generalized structure tensors and isotropic tensor functions.Com- puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 437:117725, March 2025....

    2025

  84. [92]

    PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 2007

    Ercan Gürses.Aspects of Energy Minimization in Solid Mechanics: Evolution of Inelastic Microstructures and Crack Propagation. PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 2007

    2007

  85. [93]

    Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021

    Stefan Kollmannsberger, Davide D’Angella, Moritz Jokeit, and Leon Herrmann.Deep Learning in Computational Mechanics: An Introductory Course, volume 977 ofStudies in Computational Intelligence. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021. ISBN 978-3-030-76586-6 978-3-030-7658...

    2021 doi

  86. [94]

    Thomas Seidl, Reese E

    Ryan Yan, D. Thomas Seidl, Reese E. Jones, and Panayiotis Papadopoulos. A direct-adjoint approach for material point model calibration with application to plasticity.Computational Materials Science, 255:113885, June 2025. ISSN 0927-0256. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2025.113885

    2025

  87. [95]

    John M. Ball. Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 63(4):337–403, 1976. ISSN 1432-0673. doi:10.1007/BF00279992

    1976 doi

  88. [96]

    Kalina, and Markus Kästner

    Alexandra Otto, Max Rosenkranz, Karl A. Kalina, and Markus Kästner. Data-Driven Inverse Design of Spinodoid Architected Materials.GAMM-Mitteilungen, 48(4):e70008, 2025. ISSN 1522-2608. doi:10.1002/gamm.70008

    2025 doi

  89. [97]

    Franz Dammaß, Dennis Schab, Harald Rohm, and Markus Kästner. Rate- and temperature-dependent ductile-to- brittle fracture transition: Experimental investigation and phase-field analysis for toffee.Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 297:109878, February 2024. ISSN 0013-7944. doi:1...

    2024

  90. [98]

    On thermo-viscoelastic experimental characterization and numerical modelling of VHB polymer.International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 118:103263, January 2020

    Zisheng Liao, Mokarram Hossain, Xiaohu Yao, Markus Mehnert, and Paul Steinmann. On thermo-viscoelastic experimental characterization and numerical modelling of VHB polymer.International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 118:103263, January 2020. ISSN 0020-7462. doi:10.1016/j.ij...

    2020

  91. [99]

    Experimental study and numerical modelling of VHB 4910 polymer.Computational Materials Science, 59:65–74, June 2012

    Mokarram Hossain, Duc Khoi Vu, and Paul Steinmann. Experimental study and numerical modelling of VHB 4910 polymer.Computational Materials Science, 59:65–74, June 2012. ISSN 0927-0256. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.027. 32 A physics-augmented neural network framework for fini...

    2012 doi

  92. [100]

    Jan Niklas Fuhg, Reese Edward Jones, and Nikolaos Bouklas. Extreme sparsification of physics-augmented neural networks for interpretable model discovery in mechanics.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 426:116973, June 2024. ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma...

    2024

  93. [101]

    McCulloch, Skyler R

    Jeremy A. McCulloch, Skyler R. St. Pierre, Kevin Linka, and Ellen Kuhl. On sparse regression, Lp-regularization, and automated model discovery.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 125(14):e7481,

  94. [102]

    doi:10.1002/nme.7481

    ISSN 1097-0207. doi:10.1002/nme.7481

    doi

  95. [103]

    Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2023

    Shahab Sahraee and Peter Wriggers.Tensor Calculus and Differential Geometry for Engineers: With Solved Exer- cises. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2023. ISBN 978-3-031-33952-3 978-3-031-33953-0. doi:10.1007/978- 3-031-33953-0. 33

    2023 doi

  96. [108]

    Kalina, Jörg Brummund, Brain Riemer, and Markus Kästner

    Lennart Linden, Karl A. Kalina, Jörg Brummund, Brain Riemer, and Markus Kästner. A dual-stage constitutive modeling framework based on finite strain data-driven identification and physics-augmented neural networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 447:118...

    2025

  97. [109]

    Incompressible rubber thermoelasticity: A neural network approach

    Martin Zlati ´c and Marko ˇCanadija. Incompressible rubber thermoelasticity: A neural network approach. Computational Mechanics, 71(5):895–916, 2023. ISSN 1432-0924. doi:10.1007/s00466-023-02278-y

    2023 doi

  98. [2000]

    ISBN 978-3-662-04109-3

  99. [2021]

    doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104703

    ISSN 00225096. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104703

    2021

  100. [2022]

    doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115248

    ISSN 0045-7825. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115248. 29 A physics-augmented neural network framework for finite strain incompressible viscoelasticityA PREPRINT

    2022

  101. [2024]

    doi:10.1007/s00466-023-02355-2

    ISSN 1432-0924. doi:10.1007/s00466-023-02355-2

    doi

  102. [7825]

    doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.114790

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.