Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 51 references

Linear Growth of the Vorticity Maximum for Axisymmetric Euler Flows Without Swirl

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the maximum vorticity in a head-on collision of two coaxial vortex rings grows at least linearly on almost every large dyadic interval, with the radial moment at t^{3/2} up to logarithms.

desk verdict A genuine advance in lower bounds for anti-parallel axisymmetric Euler: first super-linear radial-moment growth and linear-on-large-sets vorticity maximum, with an argument that appears correct despite a display typo. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.03171 v4 pith:GHAR5RWW submitted 2025-11-05 math.AP

Daomin Cao , Junhong Fan , Guolin Qin This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3176B47
keywords axisymmetricEulerequationsvortexstretchinganti-parallelvorticityvortex-ringcollisionradial-momentgrowthmixedmomentsmaximumt^{4/3}conjecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies inviscid, swirl-free axisymmetric flows of an ideal fluid — the geometry of two coaxial vortex rings moving toward each other. It proves that the radial moment of the vorticity, a measure of how far vorticity has been carried outward, grows at least like t^{3/2} (up to logarithms), and that the maximum vorticity itself reaches the linear scale t on an arbitrarily large fraction of every sufficiently large dyadic time interval. For initial data that are vortex patches, this vorticity maximum is exactly the outer radius of the patch. If correct, this is the first lower bound on the radial moment with polynomial exponent greater than one, and it supplies the strongest known evidence that vortex stretching in this class proceeds without saturation. The mechanism is a pair of monotone 'mixed' moments that convert conservation of kinetic energy into quantitative radial escape and axial compression.

What carries the argument

The argument hinges on two new monotone moments of the vorticity distribution in the upper half-plane. The first, with weight Phi(r,z)=integral_0^z sqrt(r^2+s^2) ds, is non-increasing and gives sup_t integral rz(-omega) < infinity, which forces escaping vorticity to lie near the symmetry plane. The second, with weight Psi = lambda_0 Phi + z * rho/arsinh(rho), is also monotone and its dissipation D(t) controls both independent meridional velocity components with specific radius-dependent weights; the universal constants in this control follow from a determinant positivity condition (lambda_0 >= 2 + sup Theta(rho)) and a logarithmic-kernel estimate. The energy localization then proceeds throug

What would settle it

Run a high-resolution numerical simulation of the inviscid head-on collision of two equal, opposite axisymmetric vortex rings with the paper's sign data, and measure the Lebesgue time measure in each dyadic window [T,2T] during which the maximum vorticity exceeds cT for a fixed small c. The theorem predicts this fraction is at least 1-eta for every eta if the window is large (T>=T_eta); a persistent deficit, say a fraction below 1/2 at all large T, would falsify the linear-growth claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within the class of compactly supported, odd-in-z, sign-definite axisymmetric swirl-free Euler data, the paper proves the pointwise-in-time lower bound P(t)[log(2+t)]^{5/2}/(1+t)^{3/2} -> infinity for the radial moment P(t), and consequently ||Omega(t)||_{L^inf}[log(2+t)]^{5/4}/(1+t)^{3/4} -> infinity. More sharply, for every 0<eta<1 there are c_eta>0 and T_eta>1 such that for all T>=T_eta the set of times t in [T,2T] with the vorticity maximum at least c_eta t has measure at least (1-eta)T; for vortex patches the vorticity maximum equals the support radius. The proof also gives a quantitative energetic picture: on a density-one set of times, a vorticity truncation carrying arbitrarily close

Load-bearing premise

For the proof to work, one fixed constant lambda_0 must make a certain 2x2 dissipation matrix positive definite at every radius, so that the dissipation integral is finite in time; if the worst-case ratio ever escapes control, the energy-localization step fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The radial moment P(t) grows faster than t/log t, the previous best, and (up to logarithms) at the rate t^{3/2}; the vorticity maximum grows at least at the t^{3/4} rate in the full-time pointwise sense.
  • On a proportion 1-eta of every large dyadic interval the vorticity maximum is at least c_eta t; for vortex patches this is a statement about the outer radius of the transported patch.
  • Every vorticity L^p norm, uniformly in 1<=p<=infinity, grows: inf_p ||Omega(t)||_p [log(2+t)]^{25/12}/(1+t)^{1/4} -> infinity, upgrading the previous t^{1/4} liminf phenomenon to a pointwise-in-time statement up to logarithms.
  • The proof yields a quantitative Eulerian form of the collision picture: the part of the vorticity generating almost all the kinetic energy is simultaneously at large radius and in a shrinking neighborhood of the collision plane, on a density-one set of times.
  • No patch assumption or regularity of the patch boundary is needed; the same estimates hold for all compactly supported initial data in the class.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The t^{4/3} conjecture remains unproven, but this linear-on-most-times result narrows the range of possible scalings: the true exponent for the vorticity maximum, if it exists, lies between 1 and 4/3. A natural next step would be to construct initial data that push the linear support estimate toward t^{4/3} by concentrating energy at a slowly growing radius.
  • The mixed-moment coercivity is general enough that the same two-weight mechanism may apply to other symmetric fluid models (e.g., axisymmetric MHD or two-and-a-half-dimensional flows) where radial transport plays the role of stretching; the exterior harmonic projection lemma is symmetry-agnostic.
  • The logarithmic factors are tied to the L^1-integrability of the dissipation D; if the exceptional set could be made to decay exponentially instead of merely o(T), the t^{3/2} moment bound might improve to t^{3/2} without logs, and one might test numerically whether the true radial moment in head-on collisions has clean t^{3/2} scaling.
  • A numerical check of the near-far decomposition would be valuable: for a simulated head-on collision, track the time spent with ||Omega||_inf >= c t in dyadic windows; the theorem predicts this fraction approaches 1-eta for any prescribed eta, which is a sharp, testable signature of the mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies long-time vortex stretching for three-dimensional axisymmetric Euler flows without swirl in the anti-parallel class. It introduces two monotone mixed moments: one with weight Φ(r,z)=∫_0^z √(r²+s²)ds, yielding a uniform bound on ∫ rz[-ω], and one with the logarithmically weighted multiplier Ψ=λ₀Φ+zϱ/arsinhϱ, whose dissipation controls both spherical velocity components with scale-dependent weights. These tools are combined with positive-kernel energy estimates, an exterior harmonic-regularity estimate, and a dyadic-in-time argument. The main results are: P(t) grows at least like t^{3/2}/(log t)^{5/2}; the support radius R_ω(t) is at least linear on a (1-η) fraction of every large dyadic interval; for unit-strength relative-vorticity patches the vorticity maximum, equal to the outer radius, has the same linear growth on a large proportion of dyadic intervals and a full-time t^{3/4}/(log t)^{5/4} lower bound; and L^p vorticity norms grow for all 1≤p≤∞. The proof is explicit and does not use the previously essential vertical moment Z.

Significance. If the advertised results stand, this is a substantial advance on the lower-bound side of Childress's t^{4/3} conjecture. In particular, it gives the first radial-moment lower bound with polynomial exponent greater than one, and the first linear-scale radial support growth for this class. The method is new: the two mixed moments convert conservation of kinetic energy into radial escape, and the exterior harmonic estimate transfers exterior velocity energy to exterior vorticity. The constants are universal or data-dependent, and the logarithmic exponents are forced by the estimates rather than fitted. The external dependencies are clearly identified, and the key algebraic and analytic steps are checkable. The main limitation is secondary: the p<2 patch family relies on the external upper bound of Egamberganov–Yao, but the core linear-growth theorem does not depend on it.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (3.72)] The displayed logarithmic exponent in (3.72) appears to be a typo. The preceding line correctly factors the lower bound as (R_T/2)^{1-s_T/p}(log T)^{-s_T/p}, which gives (log T)^{1/(2p)-2}, not (log T)^{2-1/(2p)}. The subsequent proof of (1.28) uses the corrected exponent, so the error is local and does not affect the theorem.
  2. [§3.4, around (3.59)] The justification of the bound (r̄r)^{(1-2a_T)/2}(z ̄z)^{a_T} ≤ R^{1-4a_T}[(rz)(r̄ ̄z)]^{a_T} is abbreviated. The reader must divide by (z ̄z)^{a_T} and then use (r̄r)^{1/2-2a_T} ≤ R^{1-4a_T}, which follows from r ̄r ≥ R² and 1/2-2a_T<0. Adding this line would improve readability.
  3. [Proposition 3.3 / (3.18)] The asymptotic expansion of Θ(ϱ) at infinity is presented very tersely. Since boundedness of Θ is the load-bearing point for the choice of λ₀, a short derivation of Θ = 1 - 1/ℓ + O(ℓ^{-2}) from the displayed formulas for w, d_g, and g' would be helpful.
  4. [§3.3, Step 3 of Proposition 3.6] In the estimate (3.40), the factor ∫ rη_H is obtained after absorbing a factor m₀ into the constant. This is correct, but the absorption is not stated. A brief remark would prevent confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central two-moment derivation is self-contained, and the external results cited are independent and do not contain the target lower bounds.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The main lower-bound results are obtained from a new pair of mixed moments (1.30), (3.7), whose dissipation is computed from the multiplier identity (3.1) rather than assumed. Proposition 3.3 establishes coercivity of the quadratic form via the determinant computation (3.21), with the constant λ0 chosen from the boundedness of Θ(ϱ), verified by the expansions (3.17)–(3.18); this is an analytic estimate, not a fitted parameter, and it does not presuppose the growth of P(t) or Rω(t). The exterior harmonic decay lemma (3.29), the logarithmic kernel estimate (2.27) proved in Lemma 2.1, the positive kernel bounds (2.19) and (2.22), and the near–far decomposition of Lemma 3.7 are all proved in the paper from the Biot–Savart law and the conserved energy. No step renames a fitted input as a prediction: all constants are absolute or depend on the initial data through conserved quantities, and the logarithmic exponents are produced explicitly by the estimates. The cited prior works—Choi–Jeong [12], Gustafson–Miller–Tsai [32], Egamberganov–Yao [25], Lim–Jeong [38], and Danchin [16]—are authored by other groups; none is a self-citation, and none of those results contains the three-halves radial-moment lower bound or the linear support estimate. The external upper bound from [25, Theorem 1.1] is used only for the secondary patch family (1.27a), not for the central moment or linear-scale conclusions. The paper also includes an explicit limitations remark (Remark 3.8) stating that the argument does not improve the logarithmic powers; this is an honest statement of scope, not circularity. The only defect identified by the skeptic is a display typo in (3.72) in the logarithmic exponent, which does not affect the validity of the argument or its independence from the conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof is a derivation from the Euler equations and prior external theorems; it introduces no new physical entities or fitted parameters. The only hand-chosen constant, lambda_0, is a universal proof constant without data-dependent tuning. All cited external results are independent of the target lower bounds.

free parameters (1)
  • lambda_0 = universal constant, no data
    Chosen in Proposition 3.3 as lambda_0 >= 2 + sup Theta(rho) to make the second-mixed-moment dissipation positive definite. Not fitted to data; any sufficiently large universal constant works.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Danchin's global well-posedness for axisymmetric no-swirl flows with omega_0, omega_0/r in L^1 cap L^inf [16]
    Invoked in Section 1.1 and used throughout to justify the solution class, transport properties, and velocity regularity.
  • domain assumption Egamberganov-Yao axis identity P'(t) = integral_0^inf r u_r(r,0,t)^2 dr and upper bound P(t) <= C(1+t)^2 [25]
    External theorems reproduced in Section 2.1; the upper bound is used in Lemma 2.1, Prop 3.6 and Lemma 3.7 to control log P(t).
  • domain assumption Two-sided and near-far kernel estimates from Gustafson-Miller-Tsai [32]: (2.7), (2.19)-(2.22)
    Used to link kinetic energy of vorticity truncations to the positive kernels K and e; constants are universal.
  • domain assumption Radial-velocity estimate ||u_r||_{L^inf} <= C ||u||_{L^2}^{1/3} ||omega/r||_{L^inf}^{1/2} ||r Omega||_{L^1}^{1/6} from Lim-Jeong [38, Prop A.1]
    Used in Theorem 1.3 to convert radial-moment growth into L^p vorticity growth.
  • domain assumption Upper bound ||Omega(t)||_{L^inf} <= C(1+t)^{4/3} from Egamberganov-Yao [25, Thm 1.1]
    Used only in Theorem 1.4 for the 1<=p<2 patch family (1.27a). External preprint dependency.
  • standard math DiPerna-Lions renormalized transport theory for rough patch boundaries [19]
    Justifies transport of patch indicators with rough boundary and conservation of support volume.
  • standard math Spherical-harmonic expansion of harmonic gradients outside balls with vanishing monopole
    Lemma 3.5's exterior L^2 estimate C^{-3/2} relies on this standard expansion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Linear Growth of the Vorticity Maximum for Axisymmetric Euler Flows Without Swirl." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GHAR5RWW

@misc{pith2026251103171,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Linear Growth of the Vorticity Maximum for Axisymmetric Euler Flows Without Swirl},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GHAR5RWW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.03171}
}
abstract

We study long-time vortex stretching for three-dimensional axisymmetric Euler flows without swirl in the anti-parallel class associated with the head-on collision of two coaxial vortex rings. This geometry motivated Childress's \(t^{4/3}\) conjecture for the vorticity maximum in the full axisymmetric no-swirl class [S.~Childress, \emph{Physica D} \textbf{237} (2008), 1921--1925]. For unit-strength relative-vorticity patches in this class, we prove that the outer radius, which is exactly the vorticity maximum, reaches the linear scale on an arbitrarily large fixed proportion of every sufficiently large dyadic interval: for every \(0<\eta<1\), there exist \(c_\eta>0\) and \(T_\eta>1\) such that \[ \left| \left\{t\in[T,2T]: \mathcal R_\omega(t) =\|\boldsymbol\Omega(t)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb R^3)} \ge c_\eta t \right\} \right|\ge(1-\eta)T \qquad(T\ge T_\eta). \] The same estimate for \(\mathcal R_\omega(t)\) holds for all data considered below. For every nontrivial compactly supported initial datum in this class that is odd in \(z\) and non-positive for \(z>0\), we also prove \[ \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{P(t)[\log(2+t)]^{5/2}}{(1+t)^{3/2}} =+\infty. \] To the best of our knowledge, this is the first radial-moment lower bound with exponent greater than one. For unit-strength patches, the same moment bound also yields the full-time estimate \[ \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{\|\boldsymbol\Omega(t)\|_{L^\infty(\mathbb R^3)} [\log(2+t)]^{5/4}}{(1+t)^{3/4}} =+\infty. \] For general data, we further obtain a quantitative Eulerian form of simultaneous radial escape and collision. The proof uses two monotone mixed moments, a compactly supported multiplier, and an exterior \(L^2\) estimate for the velocity generated by interior vorticity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.03171 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Reflected-point geometry for the positive kernels. Panel (b) illustrates the near–far decomposition introduced below. Let f be any bounded, compactly supported, nonnegative measurable function on Π+. Denote by f odd its odd extension in z, let uf be the Biot–Savart velocity generated by −f oddeθ, and set E(f) = 1 2 ∥uf ∥ 2 L2(R3) . The vector field −f oddeθ is divergence-free in the sense of distributions and belong… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. The localization argument first transfers the exterior velocity energy to vorticity at large cylindrical radius and then places the energy-generating part in a shrinking neighborhood of the symmetry plane. In panel (b), the two signs come from odd reflection across z = 0. The arrows describe radial escape and approach to z = 0, not tracked particle trajectories, and the shaded layer marks the vorticity truncation ra… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The localization argument transfers the energy of the full velocity outside BC0RT to {ϱ > RT , r > RT /2}, after removing the interior part and the high axial cap. For every s > R, this series and its gradient converge in the exterior Dirichlet space on {|x| > s}. For s > R, orthogonality gives Z |x|>s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    K. Abe, K. Choi, I.-J. Jeong, Y.-J. Sim, and K. Woo,Existence and stability of Sadovskii vortices: from patch to smooth vortices, preprint, arXiv:2507.00910 (2025, revised 2026); arXiv:2507.00910

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Abidi, T

    H. Abidi, T. Hmidi, and S. Keraani,On the global well-posedness for the axisymmetric Euler equations, Math. Ann.347(2010), no. 1, 15–41; doi:10.1007/s00208-009-0425-6

    doi:10.1007/s00208-009-0425-6 2010

  3. [3]

    W. Ao, Y. Liu, and J. Wei,Clustered travelling vortex rings to the axisymmetric three-dimensional incom- pressible Euler flows, Physica D434(2022), Paper No. 133258; doi:10.1016/j.physd.2022.133258

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Bang and A

    J. Bang and A. Cheskidov,Sharp ill-posedness of the Euler equations in Lorentz spaces, preprint, arXiv:2605.16502 (2026); arXiv:2605.16502

    arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    J. T. Beale, T. Kato, and A. Majda,Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations, Comm. Math. Phys.94(1984), no. 1, 61–66; doi:10.1007/BF01212349

    doi:10.1007/bf01212349 1984

  6. [6]

    Butt` a, G

    P. Butt` a, G. Cavallaro, and C. Marchioro,Leapfrogging vortex rings as scaling limit of Euler equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal.57(2025), no. 1, 789–824; doi:10.1137/24M1642391

    doi:10.1137/24m1642391 2025

  7. [7]

    J. Chen,Asymptotically self-similar blowup for 3D incompressible Euler with C 1,1/3− velocity II: 3D profiles, blowup, and limiting behavior, preprint, arXiv:2605.15130 (2026); arXiv:2605.15130

    arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    S. Childress,Models of vorticity growth in Euler flows I: axisymmetric flow without swirl, and II: almost 2-D dynamics, AML Reports 05-07 and 06-07, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 2007

    2007

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Childress,Growth of anti-parallel vorticity in Euler flows, Physica D237(2008), no

    S. Childress,Growth of anti-parallel vorticity in Euler flows, Physica D237(2008), no. 14–17, 1921–1925; doi:10.1016/j.physd.2008.02.028

    2008 doi

  2. [10]

    Childress, A

    S. Childress, A. D. Gilbert, and P. Valiant,Eroding dipoles and vorticity growth for Euler flows in R3: axisymmetric flow without swirl, J. Fluid Mech.805(2016), 1–30; doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.573

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Choi and I.-J

    K. Choi and I.-J. Jeong,Filamentation near Hill’s vortex, Comm. Partial Differential Equations48(2023), no. 1, 54–85; doi:10.1080/03605302.2022.2139721

    2023

  4. [12]

    Choi and I.-J

    K. Choi and I.-J. Jeong,On vortex stretching for anti-parallel axisymmetric flows, Amer. J. Math.147(2025), no. 5, 1251–1284; doi:10.1353/ajm.2025.a971091

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    Choi, I.-J

    K. Choi, I.-J. Jeong, and Y.-J. Sim,On existence of Sadovskii vortex patch: a touching pair of symmetric counter-rotating uniform vortices, Ann. PDE11(2025), Paper No. 18; doi:10.1007/s40818-025-00212-4

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    Chu, C.-T

    C.-C. Chu, C.-T. Wang, C.-C. Chang, R.-Y. Chang, and W.-T. Chang,Head-on collision of two coaxial vortex rings: experiment and computation, J. Fluid Mech.296(1995), 39–71; doi:10.1017/S0022112095002060

    1995 doi

  7. [15]

    C´ ordoba, L

    D. C´ ordoba, L. Mart ´ ınez-Zoroa, and F. Zheng,Finite time singularities to the 3D incompressible Euler equations for solutions in C ∞(R3 \ {0}) ∩C 1,α ∩L 2, Ann. PDE11(2025), Paper No. 19; doi:10.1007/s40818- 025-00214-2

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    Danchin,Axisymmetric incompressible flows with bounded vorticity, Russian Math

    R. Danchin,Axisymmetric incompressible flows with bounded vorticity, Russian Math. Surveys62(2007), no. 3, 475–496; doi:10.1070/RM2007v062n03ABEH004412

    2007 doi

  9. [17]

    Danchin,On perfect fluids with bounded vorticity, C

    R. Danchin,On perfect fluids with bounded vorticity, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris345(2007), no. 7, 391–394; doi:10.1016/j.crma.2007.09.002

    2007 doi

  10. [18]

    D´ avila, M

    J. D´ avila, M. del Pino, M. Musso, and J. Wei,Leapfrogging vortex rings for the three-dimensional incompressible Euler equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.77(2024), no. 10, 3843–3957; doi:10.1002/cpa.22199

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    R. J. DiPerna and P.-L. Lions,Ordinary differential equations, transport theory and Sobolev spaces, Invent. Math.98(1989), no. 3, 511–547; doi:10.1007/BF01393835

    1989 doi

  12. [20]

    Do,On vorticity gradient growth for the axisymmetric 3D Euler equations without swirl, Arch

    T. Do,On vorticity gradient growth for the axisymmetric 3D Euler equations without swirl, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.234(2019), no. 1, 181–209; doi:10.1007/s00205-019-01388-3

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Donati, L

    M. Donati, L. E. Hientzsch, C. Lacave, and E. Miot,On the dynamics of leapfrogging vortex rings, preprint, arXiv:2503.21604 (2025); arXiv:2503.21604

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    T. D. Drivas and T. M. Elgindi,Singularity formation in the incompressible Euler equation in finite and infinite time, EMS Surv. Math. Sci.10(2023), no. 1, 1–100; doi:10.4171/EMSS/66

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    F. W. Dyson,The potential of an anchor ring, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A184(1893), 43–95; doi:10.1098/rsta.1893.0002

  16. [24]

    Egamberganov and D

    K. Egamberganov and D. Lim,On the upper bound for the vorticity growth of bi-rotational Euler flows without swirl, preprint, arXiv:2607.27560 (2026); arXiv:2607.27560

    2026 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Egamberganov and Y

    K. Egamberganov and Y. Yao,Growth estimates for axisymmetric Euler equations without swirl, preprint, arXiv:2512.13456 (2025); arXiv:2512.13456. LINEAR GROWTH OF THE VORTICITY MAXIMUM 35

    2025

  18. [26]

    T. M. Elgindi,Finite-time singularity formation for C 1,α solutions to the incompressible Euler equations on R3, Ann. of Math. (2)194(2021), no. 3, 647–727; doi:10.4007/annals.2021.194.3.2

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    T. M. Elgindi, T.-E. Ghoul, and N. Masmoudi,On the stability of self-similar blow-up for C 1,α so- lutions to the incompressible Euler equations on R3, Camb. J. Math.9(2021), no. 4, 1035–1075; doi:10.4310/CJM.2021.v9.n4.a4

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    Feng and V

    H. Feng and V. ˇSver´ ak,On the Cauchy problem for axi-symmetric vortex rings, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 215(2015), no. 1, 89–123; doi:10.1007/s00205-014-0775-4

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    Gallay and V

    T. Gallay and V. ˇSver´ ak,Vanishing viscosity limit for axisymmetric vortex rings, Invent. Math.237(2024), no. 1, 275–348; doi:10.1007/s00222-024-01261-5

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Gamblin and X

    P. Gamblin and X. Saint Raymond,On three-dimensional vortex patches, Bull. Soc. Math. France123(1995), no. 3, 375–424; doi:10.24033/bsmf.2265

    1995 doi

  23. [31]

    Guan, Z.-J

    H. Guan, Z.-J. Wei, E. R. Rasolkova, and C.-J. Wu,Numerical simulations of two coaxial vortex rings head-on collision, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech.8(2016), no. 4, 616–647; doi:10.4208/aamm.2014.m829

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    Gustafson, E

    S. Gustafson, E. Miller, and T.-P. Tsai,Growth rates for anti-parallel vortex tube Euler flows in three and higher dimensions, J. Math. Fluid Mech.28(2026), no. 1, Paper No. 19; doi:10.1007/s00021-026-01001-0

    2026 doi

  25. [33]

    Guo, I.-J

    D. Guo, I.-J. Jeong, and L. Zhao,Global dynamics of a single vortex ring, preprint, arXiv:2602.20131 (2026); arXiv:2602.20131

    2026

  26. [34]

    Huang and J

    D. Huang and J. Tong,Steady contiguous vortex-patch dipole solutions of the 2D incompressible Euler equation, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.249(2025), Paper No. 46; doi:10.1007/s00205-025-02113-z

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    Q. Jiu, J. Liu, and D. Niu,Global existence of weak solutions to the incompressible axisymmetric Euler equations without swirl, J. Nonlinear Sci.31(2021), Paper No. 36; doi:10.1007/s00332-021-09687-4

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    Kambe and T

    T. Kambe and T. Minota,Acoustic wave radiated by head-on collision of two vortex rings, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A386(1983), no. 1791, 277–308; doi:10.1098/rspa.1983.0037

    1983

  29. [37]

    Kiselev,Small scales and singularity formation in fluid dynamics, inProceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Rio de Janeiro 2018

    A. Kiselev,Small scales and singularity formation in fluid dynamics, inProceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Rio de Janeiro 2018. Vol. III. Invited Lectures, World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ, 2018, pp. 2363–2390; arXiv:1807.00184

    2018 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Lim and I.-J

    D. Lim and I.-J. Jeong,On the optimal rate of vortex stretching for axisymmetric Euler flows without swirl, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.249(2025), Paper No. 32; doi:10.1007/s00205-025-02103-1

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    T. T. Lim and T. B. Nickels,Instability and reconnection in the head-on collision of two vortex rings, Nature 357(1992), 225–227; doi:10.1038/357225a0

    1992 doi

  32. [40]

    Majda,Vorticity and the mathematical theory of incompressible fluid flow, Comm

    A. Majda,Vorticity and the mathematical theory of incompressible fluid flow, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.39 (1986), suppl., S187–S220; doi:10.1002/cpa.3160390711

    1986 doi

  33. [41]

    A. J. Majda and A. L. Bertozzi,Vorticity and Incompressible Flow, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    2002

  34. [42]

    Nobili and C

    C. Nobili and C. Seis,Renormalization and energy conservation for axisymmetric fluid flows, Math. Ann. 382(2022), no. 1–2, 1–36; doi:10.1007/s00208-020-02050-0

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    Saint Raymond,Remarks on axisymmetric solutions of the incompressible Euler system, Comm

    X. Saint Raymond,Remarks on axisymmetric solutions of the incompressible Euler system, Comm. Partial Differential Equations19(1994), no. 1–2, 321–334; doi:10.1080/03605309408821018

    1994 doi

  36. [44]

    Serfati,R´ egularit´ e stratifi´ ee et ´ equation d’Euler 3D ` a temps grand, C

    P. Serfati,R´ egularit´ e stratifi´ ee et ´ equation d’Euler 3D ` a temps grand, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math.318 (1994), no. 10, 925–928

    1994

  37. [45]

    F. Shao, D. Wei, P. Zhang, and Z. Zhang,Self-similar blow-up solutions of d-dimensional incompressible Euler equations withC 1,(1−2/d)− velocity, preprint, arXiv:2605.19716 (2026); arXiv:2605.19716

    2026 arXiv

  38. [46]

    F. Shao, D. Wei, and Z. Zhang,Global regularity of axisymmetric Euler equations without swirl in higher dimensions, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.)42(2026), no. 3, 663–679; doi:10.1007/s10114-026-5110-0

    2026 doi

  39. [47]

    Shariff and A

    K. Shariff and A. Leonard,Vortex rings, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.24(1992), 235–279; doi:10.1146/ annurev.fl.24.010192.001315

    1992

  40. [48]

    Shirota and T

    T. Shirota and T. Yanagisawa,Note on global existence for axially symmetric solutions of the Euler system, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci.70(1994), no. 10, 299–304; doi:10.3792/pjaa.70.299

    1994 doi

  41. [49]

    Shkoller,Incompressible Euler blowup at the C 1,1/3 threshold, preprint, arXiv:2603.10945 (2026); arXiv:2603.10945

    S. Shkoller,Incompressible Euler blowup at the C 1,1/3 threshold, preprint, arXiv:2603.10945 (2026); arXiv:2603.10945

    2026 arXiv

  42. [50]

    S. K. Stanaway, K. Shariff, and F. Hussain,Head-on collision of viscous vortex rings, inStudying Turbulence Using Numerical Simulation Databases, 2: Proceedings of the 1988 Summer Program, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, 1988, pp. 287–309

    1988

  43. [51]

    M. R. Ukhovskii and V. I. Iudovich,Axially symmetric flows of ideal and viscous fluids filling the whole space, J. Appl. Math. Mech.32(1968), no. 1, 52–62; doi:10.1016/0021-8928(68)90147-0. 36 DAOMIN CAO, JUNHONG F AN, AND GUOLIN QIN State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Scienc...

    1968 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.