pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.04284 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-06 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

General properties of the RABBITT at parity mixing conditions

Maria M. Popova , Sergei N. Yudin , Alexei N. Grum-Grzhimailo , Elena V. Gryzlova This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 00:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords RABBITTparity mixingphotoelectron angular distributionssymmetry violationfree-electron lasertwo-sideband interferenceneonpulse reconstruction
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a two-sideband RABBITT setup with even and odd harmonics, parity mixing produces symmetry violations in photoelectron angular distributions that differ from those seen in other schemes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the general properties of RABBITT when a free-electron laser generates a comb of alternating even and odd harmonics separated by three times the seed frequency. This creates two sidebands between main lines instead of one, enabling parity mixing where electrons of opposite parities reach the same final energy and interfere. Interference from this mixing appears only in angle-resolved measurements as violations of symmetry in the photoelectron angular distributions. The authors examine these effects across different polarization geometries and identify a crucial difference in the symmetry properties compared with traditional parity-mixing photoionization. Illustrative calculations for neon with typical modern-facility pulses also explore whether the angle-resolved data could reconstruct the driving pulse's temporal profile.

Core claim

In the two-sideband RABBITT scheme enabled by even and odd harmonics, parity mixing produces interference that breaks symmetries in the angle-resolved photoelectron angular distributions in a manner distinct from the symmetry patterns found in other photoionization processes that allow parity mixing.

What carries the argument

Two-sideband interference under parity-mixing conditions, which generates observable symmetry violations in angle-resolved photoelectron angular distributions for specified polarization geometries.

If this is right

  • Symmetry violations appear specifically in angle-resolved distributions for the polarization geometries examined.
  • The pattern of these violations differs from patterns in single-sideband RABBITT or other parity-mixing processes.
  • Angle-resolved measurements in neon can in principle recover the temporal profile of the driving pulse.
  • The effects remain observable with pulse parameters typical of current free-electron laser facilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The distinct symmetry signature may enable cleaner separation of pulse characterization from atomic response in experiments.
  • Similar two-sideband setups could be tested on other rare-gas targets to map how the symmetry difference scales with atomic number.
  • Extension to molecular targets would test whether the reported symmetry distinction survives when additional rotational degrees of freedom are present.

Load-bearing premise

The two-sideband interference under parity mixing conditions produces observable and distinct symmetry violations in angle-resolved photoelectron angular distributions for the considered polarization geometries and neon target.

What would settle it

If angle-resolved photoelectron angular distributions measured in the two-sideband RABBITT geometry exhibit exactly the same symmetry properties as those in conventional parity-mixing schemes without the reported crucial difference, the central claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.04284 by Alexei N. Grum-Grzhimailo, Elena V. Gryzlova, Maria M. Popova, Sergei N. Yudin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) The scheme of the 2-SB RABBITT for linearly ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Scheme ‘ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The scheme of the 2-SB RABBITT for ‘ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Population of states of different magnetic quan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Linearly polarized fields in the perpendicular direc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The asymmetry of electron emitted in the upper and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Parity mixing in photoionization, i.e. when emitted electrons have different parities but the same energy, causes interference observable only in angle-resolved measurements. The interference typically manifests as a symmetry violation in the photoelectron angular distributions. The traditional, based on HHG, RABBITT scheme with high-order harmonics separated by twice the seed field energy, precludes parity mixing. On the contrary, a free-electron laser provides a possibility to generate even harmonics. Using triple the fundamental frequency as a seed, one obtains a comb of alternating even and odd harmonics, separated by three times the initial frequency [Nature 578, 386-391 (2020)] (2-SB RABBITT). In this setup, there are two sidebands between the main photoelectron lines, versus one in the traditional scheme. In the paper, we examine the general properties of a two-sideband scheme and analyze the symmetry breakdown of photoelectron angular distributions for various polarization geometries of the incident pulse. We found a crucial difference in symmetries between 2-SB RABBITT and other photoionization schemes with parity mixing. Illustrative calculations are carried out for neon with pulse parameters typical for modern facilities. The possibility to reconstruct the temporal profile of the pulse from the angle-resolved measurements is discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes general properties of the two-sideband (2-SB) RABBITT scheme under parity-mixing conditions, enabled by FELs that generate alternating even and odd harmonics separated by 3ω. It derives the relevant interference terms absent in traditional single-sideband RABBITT, examines how these terms break forward-backward or left-right symmetry in photoelectron angular distributions across multiple polarization geometries, presents illustrative neon calculations with facility-typical parameters, and discusses reconstruction of the pulse temporal profile from angle-resolved data. The central claim is a crucial difference in symmetries relative to other photoionization schemes that permit parity mixing.

Significance. If the derived cross terms and resulting symmetry violations hold, the work identifies a structurally distinct interference mechanism in 2-SB RABBITT that is directly traceable to the two-sideband structure and even/odd harmonic alternation. This could open new routes for probing parity mixing and attosecond pulse characterization at FEL facilities. The explicit construction of the interference terms, rather than parameter fitting, is a strength.

major comments (1)
  1. The symmetry analysis relies on tracking additional cross terms between even and odd harmonics; however, the manuscript does not provide the explicit angular-distribution expressions (or the relevant section/equation) that demonstrate how these terms produce observable violations distinct from single-sideband or conventional parity-mixing schemes. Adding these expressions would make the 'crucial difference' claim directly verifiable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment. We address the point raised below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The symmetry analysis relies on tracking additional cross terms between even and odd harmonics; however, the manuscript does not provide the explicit angular-distribution expressions (or the relevant section/equation) that demonstrate how these terms produce observable violations distinct from single-sideband or conventional parity-mixing schemes. Adding these expressions would make the 'crucial difference' claim directly verifiable.

    Authors: We agree that making the explicit angular-distribution expressions more prominent would improve verifiability of the symmetry distinctions. The interference cross terms between even and odd harmonics are derived in Section 3 and enter the general photoelectron angular distribution via Eq. (12). Their role in breaking forward-backward and left-right symmetries is then analyzed for the polarization geometries in Section 4. To directly address the referee's suggestion, we will add the fully expanded angular-distribution formulas (including the parity-mixing cross terms) for the principal geometries in the revised manuscript, together with a short comparison to the corresponding single-sideband expressions. This addition will render the distinct symmetry violations explicit and traceable to the two-sideband structure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper's central derivation consists of an explicit symmetry analysis of photoelectron angular distributions in the 2-SB RABBITT scheme, constructed from the two-sideband interference terms that arise when even and odd harmonics are separated by 3ω. These cross terms between different-parity harmonics are absent in traditional single-sideband RABBITT and are tracked directly through the polarization geometries and neon target calculations. The manuscript relies on standard photoionization interference theory and the cited external Nature reference for the 2-SB setup itself; no predictions reduce to parameters fitted inside the paper, no equations are self-definitional, and no load-bearing steps depend on self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems. The illustrative calculations visualize the symmetry violations rather than defining them, leaving the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are described. The work rests on established quantum-mechanical treatment of photoionization and RABBITT interference.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanical description of two-photon interference and parity selection rules in photoionization
    Invoked implicitly when discussing parity mixing and angular distributions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5540 in / 1351 out tokens · 46319 ms · 2026-05-18T00:24:59.873705+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In order to observe the IR field phase dependence of the photoelectron spectrum, one needs the inter- ference of the pathways originating from different mainlines. The absorption of one IR photon from N-th ML brings an electron to the continuum at (N+1)-th SB, while the emission of one IR photon from the subsequent (N+3)-th ML brings an elec- tron to the ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Angle-integrated spectra do not depend on the IR field phase as all the IR phase-dependent interfer- ence terms are vanished due to parity conservation

    work page

  3. [3]

    On the contrary, the interference of two- and three- order amplitudes (absorption of one IR photon from N-th ML and emission of two IR photons from (N+3)-th ML bring an electron to the continuum at (N+1)-th SB), observable in the angle-resolved spectra, depends on the IR delay

    work page

  4. [4]

    Any allowed oscillations in the angle-resolved spectra occur on triple 3ω ir frequency (‘e−i(ωt+ϕ)(ei(ωt+ϕ)ei(ωt+ϕ))∗’) instead of the double 2ωir in conventional 1-SB RABBITT

    work page

  5. [5]

    =0 𝜙!"=𝜋4 𝜙!

    The contributions to the angle-resolved spectra which inherited symmetries from the electromag- netic field (k= 0,2,4. . .) do not depend on IR field phase, while contributions that violate the symme- try (k= 1,3,5. . .) do depend. Unlike the case of 4 1-SB scheme, where the interfering terms are even and their ratios to angle-integrated photoionization p...

    work page

  6. [6]

    P. K. Maroju, C. Grazioli, M. Di Fraia, M. Moioli, D. Er- tel, H. Ahmadi, O. Plekan, P. Finetti, E. Allaria, L. Gi- annessi, G. De Ninno, C. Spezzani, G. Penco, S. Spamp- inati, A. Demidovich, M. B. Danailov, R. Borghes, G. Kourousias, C. E. Sanches Dos Reis, F. Bill´ e, A. A. Lutman, R. J. Squibb, R. Feifel, P. Carpeggiani, M. Re- duzzi, T. Mazza, M. Mey...

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Ritchie, Theory of the angular distribution of pho- toelectrons ejected from optically active molecules and molecular negative ions, Phys

    B. Ritchie, Theory of the angular distribution of pho- toelectrons ejected from optically active molecules and molecular negative ions, Phys. Rev. A13, 1411 (1976)

    work page 1976

  8. [8]

    Fano, Spin orientation of photoelectrons ejected by circularly polarized light, Phys

    U. Fano, Spin orientation of photoelectrons ejected by circularly polarized light, Phys. Rev.178, 131 (1969)

    work page 1969

  9. [9]

    Lewenstein, P

    M. Lewenstein, P. Balcou, M. Y. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Phys. Rev. A49, 2117 (1994)

    work page 1994

  10. [10]

    V. V. Strelkov, V. T. Platonenko, A. F. Sterzhantov, and M. Y. Ryabikin, Attosecond electromagnetic pulses: generation, measurement, and application. generation of high-order harmonics of an intense laser field for attosec- ond pulse production, Physics-Uspekhi59, 425 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Callegari, A

    C. Callegari, A. N. Grum-Grzhimailo, K. L. Ishikawa, K. C. Prince, G. Sansone, and K. Ueda, Atomic, molec- ular and optical physics applications of longitudinally coherent and narrow bandwidth free-electron lasers, Physics Reports904, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Allaria, B

    E. Allaria, B. Diviacco, C. Callegari, P. Finetti, B. Mahieu, J. Viefhaus, M. Zangrando, G. De Ninno, G. Lambert, E. Ferrari, J. Buck, M. Ilchen, B. Vodungbo, N. Mahne, C. Svetina, C. Spezzani, S. Di Mitri, G. Penco, M. Trov´ o, W. M. Fawley, P. R. Rebernik, D. Gau- thier, C. Grazioli, M. Coreno, B. Ressel, A. Kivim¨ aki, T. Mazza, L. Glaser, F. Scholz, J...

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    von Korff Schmising, D

    C. von Korff Schmising, D. Weder, T. Noll, B. Pfau, M. Hennecke, C. Str¨ uber, I. Radu, M. Schneider, S. Staeck, C. M. G¨ unther, J. L¨ uning, A. e. d. Merhe, J. Buck, G. Hartmann, J. Viefhaus, R. Treusch, and S. Eisebitt, Generating circularly polarized radiation in the extreme ultraviolet spectral range at the free-electron laser flash, Review of Scient...

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    O. Kfir, P. Grychtol, E. Turgut, R. Knut, D. Zusin, D. Popmintchev, T. Popmintchev, H. Nembach, J. M. Shaw, A. Fleischer, H. Kapteyn, M. Murnane, and O. Co- hen, Generation of bright phase-matched circularly- polarized extreme ultraviolet high harmonics, Nature Photonics9, 99 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Mahieu, S

    B. Mahieu, S. Stremoukhov, D. Gauthier, C. Spez- zani, C. Alves, B. Vodungbo, P. Zeitoun, V. Malka, G. De Ninno, and G. Lambert, Control of ellipticity in high-order harmonic generation driven by two linearly polarized fields, Phys. Rev. A97, 043857 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    M. A. Khokhlova, M. Y. Emelin, M. Y. Ryabikin, and V. V. Strelkov, Polarization control of quasimonochro- matic xuv light produced via resonant high-order har- monic generation, Phys. Rev. A103, 043114 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Emelin and M

    M. Emelin and M. Ryabikin, High-ellipticity resonant below-threshold harmonic generation by a helium atom driven by a moderately intense elliptically polarized laser field., Opt Quant Electron57, 434 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    A. N. Grum-Grzhimailo, E. V. Gryzlova, E. I. Starosel- skaya, J. Venzke, and K. Bartschat, Interfering one- photon and two-photon ionization by femtosecond vuv pulses in the region of an intermediate resonance, Phys. Rev. A91, 063418 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    K. C. Prince, E. Allaria, C. Callegari, R. Cucini, G. D. Ninno, S. D. Mitri, and ithers, Coherent control with a short-wavelength free-electron laser, Nat. Photonics10, 176 (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    M. V. Frolov, N. L. Manakov, A. A. Silaev, and N. V. Vvedenskii, Analytic description of high-order harmonic generation by atoms in a two-color laser field, Phys. Rev. A81, 063407 (2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    C. A. Mancuso, D. D. Hickstein, K. M. Dorney, J. L. Ellis, E. Hasovi´ c, R. Knut, P. Grychtol, C. Gentry, M. Gopalakrishnan, D. Zusin, F. J. Dollar, X.-M. Tong, D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, W. Becker, H. C. Kapteyn, and M. M. Murnane, Controlling electron-ion rescattering in two- color circularly polarized femtosecond laser fields, Phys. Rev. A93, 053406 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Douguet, A

    N. Douguet, A. N. Grum-Grzhimailo, E. V. Gryzlova, E. I. Staroselskaya, J. Venzke, and K. Bartschat, Photo- electron angular distributions in bichromatic atomic ion- ization induced by circularly polarized vuv femtosecond pulses, Phys. Rev. A93, 033402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    E. V. Gryzlova, M. M. Popova, A. N. Grum-Grzhimailo, E. I. Staroselskaya, N. Douguet, and K. Bartschat, Co- herent control of the photoelectron angular distribution in ionization of neon by a circularly polarized bichromatic field in the resonance region, Phys. Rev. A100, 063417 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    A. S. Jaˇ sarevi´ c, E. Hasovi´ c, and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, High- order above-threshold ionization using a bi-elliptic or- thogonal two-color laser field with optimal field parame- ters, Atoms11, 10.3390/atoms11060091 (2023)

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms11060091 2023

  25. [25]

    Gebre, S

    Y. Gebre, S. Walker, and A. Becker, Photoelectron spec- tra in circularly and elliptically polarized laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A109, 023120 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Itatani, F

    J. Itatani, F. Qu´ er´ e, G. L. Yudin, M. Y. Ivanov, F. Krausz, and P. B. Corkum, Attosecond streak cam- era, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 173903 (2002)

    work page 2002

  27. [27]

    V´ eniard, R

    V. V´ eniard, R. Ta¨ ıeb, and A. Maquet, Phase dependence of (n+ 1)-color (n >1) ir-uv photoionization of atoms with higher harmonics, Phys. Rev. A54, 721 (1996)

    work page 1996

  28. [28]

    P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Aug´ e, P. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation, Science292, 1689 (2001), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1059413

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1059413 2001

  29. [29]

    Smirnova, Y

    O. Smirnova, Y. Mairesse, S. Patchkovskii, N. Dudovich, D. Villeneuve, P. Corkum, and M. Y. Ivanov, High harmonic interferometry of multi-electron dynamics in molecules, Nature460, 972 (2009)

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    Moioli, M

    M. Moioli, M. M. Popova, K. R. Hamilton, D. Ertel, D. Busto, I. Makos, M. D. Kiselev, S. N. Yudin, H. Ah- madi, C. D. Schr¨ oter, T. Pfeifer, R. Moshammer, E. V. Gryzlova, A. N. Grum-Grzhimailo, K. Bartschat, and G. Sansone, Role of intermediate resonances in attosec- ond photoelectron interferometry in neon, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023034 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    D. You, K. Ueda, E. V. Gryzlova, A. N. Grum- Grzhimailo, M. M. Popova, E. I. Staroselskaya, O. Tugs, Y. Orimo, T. Sato, K. L. Ishikawa, P. A. Carpeg- giani, T. Csizmadia, M. F¨ ule, G. Sansone, P. K. Maroju, A. D’Elia, T. Mazza, M. Meyer, C. Callegari, M. Di Fraia, O. Plekan, R. Richter, L. Giannessi, E. Al- laria, G. De Ninno, M. Trov` o, L. Badano, B. D...

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Bharti, D

    D. Bharti, D. Atri-Schuller, G. Menning, K. R. Hamilton, R. Moshammer, T. Pfeifer, N. Douguet, K. Bartschat, and A. Harth, Decomposition of the transition phase in multi-sideband schemes for reconstruction of attosecond beating by interference of two-photon transitions, Phys. Rev. A103, 022834 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    T. Fan, P. Grychtol, R. Knut, C. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, D. D. Hickstein, D. Zusin, C. Gentry, F. J. Dollar, C. A. Mancuso, C. W. Hogle, O. Kfir, D. Legut, K. Carva, J. L. Ellis, K. M. Dorney, C. Chen, O. G. Shpyrko, E. E. Fullerton, O. Cohen, P. M. Oppe- neer, D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, A. Becker, A. A. Jaro´ n-Becker, T. Popmintchev, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Ka...

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1519666112 2015

  34. [34]

    Barreau, K

    L. Barreau, K. Veyrinas, V. Gruson, S. J.Weber, T. Au- guste, J.-F. Hergott, F. Lepetit, B. Carr´ e, J.-C. Houver, D. Dowek, and P. Sali` eres, Nat. Commun.9, 4727 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Villeneuve, P

    D. Villeneuve, P. Hockett, M. Vrakking, and H. Niikura, Coherent imaging of an attosecond electron wave packet, Science356, 1150 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Donsa, N

    S. Donsa, N. Douguet, J. Burgd¨ orfer, I. Bˇ rezinov´ a, and L. Argenti, Circular holographic ionization-phase meter, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 133203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Barth and O

    I. Barth and O. Smirnova, Spin-polarized electrons pro- duced by strong-field ionization, Phys. Rev. A.88, 013401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    Hartung, F

    A. Hartung, F. Morales, M. Kunitski, K. Hen- richs, A. Laucke, M. Richter, T. Jahnke, A. Kalinin, M. Sch¨ offler, L. P. H. Schmidt, M. Ivanov, O. Smirnova, and D. Reinhard, Electron spin polarization in strong- field ionization of xenon atoms, Nat. Photonics10, 526 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Possibility of introducing spin into at- toscience with spin-polarized electrons produced by a 11 bichromatic circularly polarized laser field, Phys. Rev. A93, 051402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    E. V. Gryzlova, M. M. Popova, and A. N. Grum- Grzhimailo, Spin polarization of photoelectrons in bichromatic extreme-ultraviolet atomic ionization, Phys. Rev. A102, 053116 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    R. E. Goetz, C. P. Koch, and L. Greenman, Perfect con- trol of photoelectron anisotropy for randomly oriented ensembles of molecules by xuv rempi and polarization shaping, The Journal of Chemical Physics151, 074106 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Atomic and molecular processes in a strong bicircular laser field, Atoms6(2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    M. M. Popova, E. V. Gryzlova, M. D. Kiselev, and A. N. Grum-Grzhimailo, Ionization of atoms by a bichromatic fields ofω+2ωmultiple frequencies with arbitrary polar- ization, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 135, 58–72 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Hockett, Angle-resolved RABBITT: theory and nu- merics, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Op- tical Physics50, 154002 (2017)

    P. Hockett, Angle-resolved RABBITT: theory and nu- merics, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Op- tical Physics50, 154002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    D. I. R. Boll and O. A. Foj´ on, Attosecond polarization control in atomic RABBITT-like experiments assisted by a circularly polarized laser, J. Phys. B50(2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    A. S. Kheifets and Z. Xu, Polarization control of RAB- BITT in noble gas atoms, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics56, 155601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    M. M. Popova, E. V. Gryzlova, S. N. Yudin, and A. N. Grum-Grzhimailo, Advantages of polarization control in rabbitt, Phys. Rev. A111, 033105 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Popova, S

    M. Popova, S. Yudin, E. Gryzlova, M. Kiselev, and A. Grum-Grzhimailo, Attosecond interferometry involv- ing discrete states, Journal of Experimental and Theo- retical Physics136, 259 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    V. V. Balashov, A. N. Grum-Grzhimailo, and N. M. Kabachnik,Polarization and Correlation Phenomena in Atomic Collisions: A Practical Theory Course(Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 2000)

    work page 2000

  50. [50]

    Froese Fischer, T

    C. Froese Fischer, T. Brage, and P. J¨ onsson,Computa- tional Atomic Structure. An MCHF Approach(Bristol, Institute of Physics Publishing, 1997)

    work page 1997

  51. [51]

    Mercouris, Y

    T. Mercouris, Y. Komninos, S. Dionissopoulou, and C. A. Nicolaides, Effects on observables of the singularity in the multiphoton free - free dipole matrix elements, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics29, L13 (1996)

    work page 1996

  52. [52]

    T. K. G.A. Korn,MATHEMATICAL HANDBOOK, sec- ond, extended and revised edition(McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, San Francisco, Toronto, London, Sydney, 1968)

    work page 1968

  53. [53]

    Busto, J

    D. Busto, J. Vinbladh, S. Zhong, M. Isinger, S. Nandi, S. Maclot, P. Johnsson, M. Gisselbrecht, A. L’Huillier, E. Lindroth, and J. M. Dahlstr¨ om, Fano’s propensity rule in angle-resolved attosecond pump-probe photoion- ization, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 133201 (2019)

    work page 2019