pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.07355 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-10 · ✦ hep-lat

Scale setting of SU(N) Yang--Mills theory, topology and large-N volume independence

Claudio Bonanno , Jorge Luis Dasilva Gol\'an , Margarita Garc\'ia P\'erez , Massimo D'Elia , Andrea Giorgieri This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 23:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat
keywords SU(N) Yang-Millsgradient flowlarge-N limittopological freezingtwisted boundary conditionsvolume independencescale settinglattice gauge theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Twisted boundary conditions and parallel tempering enable accurate gradient-flow scale setting in SU(N) Yang-Mills down to lattice spacings of 0.025 fm for N=3,5,8 and the large-N limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets the scale in SU(N) Yang-Mills theories for several values of N and in the large-N limit by using gradient flow on ensembles generated with twisted boundary conditions and the Parallel Tempering on Boundary Conditions algorithm. This combination overcomes topological freezing that normally prevents ergodic sampling at fine lattice spacings and simultaneously exploits large-N volume reduction to suppress finite-volume effects. A reader would care because reliable scale setting at fine spacings is a prerequisite for controlled continuum extrapolations and for extracting the large-N Lambda parameter via step scaling. The work quantifies the size of remaining finite-size systematics tied to topology and demonstrates that they behave as expected from volume independence at large N.

Core claim

We determine the gradient-flow scales t0 and w0 for SU(N) Yang-Mills with N=3,5,8 and extrapolate to large N, reaching lattice spacings as fine as approximately 0.025 fm for every N studied. Twisted boundary conditions implement large-N volume reduction while the Parallel Tempering on Boundary Conditions algorithm eliminates topological freezing, allowing ergodic sampling in a regime previously inaccessible. Finite-size systematics associated with topological freezing are estimated precisely, and the expected suppression of finite-volume effects from large-N twisted volume reduction is observed.

What carries the argument

The combination of twisted boundary conditions, which realizes large-N volume independence, and the Parallel Tempering on Boundary Conditions algorithm, which restores ergodicity by exchanging configurations across topological sectors.

If this is right

  • Gradient-flow scales can be determined with controlled errors down to lattice spacings of 0.025 fm for all explored N.
  • Finite-size effects from topological freezing can be quantified and shown to diminish as expected under large-N volume reduction.
  • The setup provides a practical route to step-scaling computations of the large-N Lambda parameter.
  • Volume independence at large N allows reliable results on modest physical volumes once the twist is imposed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the observed volume independence persists at still finer spacings, the computational cost of large-N studies of other observables could be reduced by working on smaller lattices.
  • The same algorithmic combination might be tested on theories with dynamical fermions to reach the large-N limit of full QCD.
  • Discrepancies between different scale-setting methods at 0.025 fm would point to residual lattice artifacts that must be understood before continuum extrapolations.

Load-bearing premise

The Parallel Tempering on Boundary Conditions algorithm together with twisted boundaries removes topological freezing and finite-volume systematics without introducing uncontrolled new biases even at the finest lattice spacings reached.

What would settle it

An independent determination of the same gradient-flow scales at a approximately 0.025 fm that disagrees beyond quoted uncertainties, or direct observation of persistent topological freezing in the generated ensembles, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.07355 by Andrea Giorgieri, Claudio Bonanno, Jorge Luis Dasilva Gol\'an, Margarita Garc\'ia P\'erez, Massimo D'Elia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: we indeed see that N2Aˆ(N) has a finite large-N limit, in agreement with our expectations. In the same figure we also show the exponential decay constant M, which turns out to not depend significantly on N, and to be of the same order of magnitude of the Yang–Mills mass gap. Indeed, for the large-N limit of M = √ 8t0m we find: M∞ = √ 8t0m∞ = 2.31(42). (39) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: , the reduction of finite-volume effects achieved thanks to TBCs over PBCs for the scale t0. With TBCs and for a short size ls ≃ √ 8t0 ∼ 0.475 fm, t0 exhibits a ∼ 10% deviation from the asymptotic value for SU(3), which is reduced to ∼ 2% for SU(8). In the case of PBCs instead, deviations by 50 − 100% are obtained for all N at ls ≃ √ 8t0. Asymptotically, boundary conditions do not matter anymore, and the t… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We set the scale of SU($N$) Yang--Mills theories for $N=3,5,8$ and in the large-$N$ limit via gradient flow, as a first step towards the computation of the large-$N$ $\Lambda$-parameter using step scaling. We adopt twisted boundary conditions to achieve large-$N$ volume reduction and the Parallel Tempering on Boundary Conditions algorithm to tame topological freezing. This setup allows accurate determinations of the gradient-flow scales down to lattice spacings as fine as $\sim 0.025$ fm for all the explored values of $N$, a regime that has never been reached with ergodic algorithms. Moreover, we are able to precisely estimate the finite-size systematics related to topological freezing, and to show the suppression of finite-volume effects expected by virtue of large-$N$ twisted volume reduction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports scale setting in SU(N) Yang-Mills theory for N=3,5,8 and the large-N limit using gradient flow. Twisted boundary conditions are used to realize large-N volume reduction, while the Parallel Tempering on Boundary Conditions algorithm is employed to suppress topological freezing. The central claims are that this combination permits accurate gradient-flow scale determinations down to a≈0.025 fm (a regime previously inaccessible with ergodic algorithms), that finite-size systematics associated with topological freezing can be precisely quantified, and that finite-volume effects are suppressed as expected from large-N twisted volume reduction.

Significance. If the sampling remains unbiased, the work is significant for large-N studies because it extends the reachable lattice spacings for higher-N Yang-Mills theories, providing a practical route toward step-scaling determinations of the large-N Λ-parameter. The successful deployment of PTBC together with twisted boundaries constitutes a concrete technical advance that addresses the long-standing topological-freezing barrier in fine-lattice simulations.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (algorithm validation): The assertion that PTBC plus twisted boundaries fully eliminates topological bias at a≈0.025 fm rests on indirect estimators (topological charge histories and swap acceptance rates). No direct cross-check against an independent ergodic reference (open boundaries or multi-level methods) is reported at the finest spacing; without such a comparison the quoted scale values could still carry an undetected systematic.
  2. [Table 3] Table 3 (scale results): The error budgets listed for the gradient-flow scales at the finest lattice spacings do not include a dedicated contribution from possible residual topological freezing. Because this is the load-bearing assumption for the accuracy claim, an explicit upper bound or sensitivity test is required.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the scales are 'accurate' but supplies neither numerical values nor error estimates; adding a brief quantitative summary would improve immediate readability.
  2. [§3] Notation for the gradient-flow scales (t0, w0, etc.) is introduced without an explicit equation reference in the first results section; a single equation defining each scale would remove ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below and indicate the revisions we will make to improve the clarity and robustness of our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (algorithm validation): The assertion that PTBC plus twisted boundaries fully eliminates topological bias at a≈0.025 fm rests on indirect estimators (topological charge histories and swap acceptance rates). No direct cross-check against an independent ergodic reference (open boundaries or multi-level methods) is reported at the finest spacing; without such a comparison the quoted scale values could still carry an undetected systematic.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's concern that a direct cross-check against an independent ergodic method at a≈0.025 fm is not reported. Performing such a comparison for N=5 and N=8 at the finest spacing is computationally prohibitive with present resources. The manuscript instead relies on indirect but quantitative indicators: topological charge histories that exhibit frequent tunneling and PTBC swap acceptance rates that remain high across all ensembles, including the finest ones. These are supplemented by our estimates of finite-size systematics associated with topological freezing. We will revise §4 to expand the discussion of the reliability of these indirect estimators, include a quantitative bound on possible residual bias derived from the measured autocorrelation times of the topological charge, and explicitly state the limitations of the current validation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Table 3] Table 3 (scale results): The error budgets listed for the gradient-flow scales at the finest lattice spacings do not include a dedicated contribution from possible residual topological freezing. Because this is the load-bearing assumption for the accuracy claim, an explicit upper bound or sensitivity test is required.

    Authors: We agree that the error budgets in Table 3 should contain an explicit term for possible residual topological freezing at the finest spacings. Although the manuscript already quantifies finite-size systematics related to topological freezing in the text, this contribution was not folded into the tabulated uncertainties. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated systematic uncertainty to the error budgets of Table 3, obtained via a sensitivity test that examines the variation of the gradient-flow scales when configurations are partitioned according to topological charge. This will make the accuracy claim fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct lattice measurements

full rationale

The paper reports direct numerical computations of gradient-flow scales (t0, w0) on SU(N) lattices using PTBC + twisted BC. No load-bearing step derives a target quantity from a fitted parameter or prior self-result by construction; the scales are extracted from the flow equation applied to simulated configurations. The work is self-contained as a computational measurement campaign against external physical units, with no renaming of known results or ansatz smuggling via citation chains. Minor self-citations (if present) are not load-bearing for the central scale determinations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard lattice gauge theory assumptions plus the effectiveness of the chosen algorithms for volume reduction and topology control; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gradient flow provides a reliable scale-setting observable independent of the specific flow time chosen within a window.
    Invoked implicitly when reporting scales down to 0.025 fm.
  • domain assumption Twisted boundary conditions achieve large-N volume independence for the quantities measured.
    Stated as enabling the volume reduction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5467 in / 1253 out tokens · 26536 ms · 2026-05-17T23:51:28.290988+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    = 1 10 = 0.1,(9) φ′(t′

    work page

  2. [2]

    Finally, to study the effect of topology on the scale set- ting, we will also compute all the scales obtained when the flow is projected into the sector with topological chargeQ= 0

    = 1 20 = 0.05,(10) and tdφ′(t) dt t=w ′2 0 = 1 10 = 0.1.(11) where φ′(t)≡ 1 N ⟨t2E(t)⟩.(12) These definitions, adopted in twisted-reduced models whereN∼ O(10 2 −10 3) is so large thatN 2 −1≃N 2, define scales with a finite large-Nlimit too, but only co- incide with the previous ones forN= 3. Finally, to study the effect of topology on the scale set- ting,...

    work page

  3. [3]

    For the physical replica (i.e., the one on which observables are computed) c(0) = 1, so the defect has no effect and links enjoy PBCs

    Links that crossDorthogonally (i.e., temporal links) are multiplied by a real factorc(r). For the physical replica (i.e., the one on which observables are computed) c(0) = 1, so the defect has no effect and links enjoy PBCs. The other replicas interpolate between periodic and open boundary conditions on the defect:c(N r −1) = 0 for the last replica and 0<...

    work page

  4. [4]

    We find t0/t′ 0 = 1.1433(42) andt ′ 1/t′ 0 = 0.3744(11), in good agree- ment with TEK resultst 0/t′ 0 = 1.140(3) andt ′ 1/t′ 0 = 0.3953(125)

    These can be compared with the same quanti- ties recently obtained within the Twisted Eguchi–Kawaii (TEK) model [55–57] in the large-Nlimit. We find t0/t′ 0 = 1.1433(42) andt ′ 1/t′ 0 = 0.3744(11), in good agree- ment with TEK resultst 0/t′ 0 = 1.140(3) andt ′ 1/t′ 0 = 0.3953(125). Finally, let us conclude our discussion by using our scale-setting results...

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update

    R. Alibertiet al., Phys. Rept.1143, 1 (2025), arXiv:2505.21476 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    M. D. Brida, R. H¨ ollwieser, F. Knechtli, T. Ko- rzec, A. Ramos, S. Sint, and R. Sommer, (2025), arXiv:2501.06633 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Infinite N phase transitions in continuum Wilson loop operators

    R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, JHEP03(2006), 064, arXiv:hep-th/0601210

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm

    M. Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys.293, 899 (2010), arXiv:0907.5491 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD

    M. L¨ uscher, JHEP08(2010), 071, [Erratum: JHEP 03, 092 (2014)], arXiv:1006.4518 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Continuous smearing of Wilson Loops

    R. Lohmayer and H. Neuberger, PoSLA TTICE2011, 249 (2011), arXiv:1110.3522 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  11. [11]

    Critical slowing down and the gradient flow coupling in the Schr\"odinger functional

    P. Fritzsch, A. Ramos, and F. Stollenwerk, PoSLat- tice2013, 461 (2014), arXiv:1311.7304 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Ramos Martinez and G

    A. Ramos Martinez and G. Catumba, PoSLA T- TICE2022, 383 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Alles, G

    B. Alles, G. Boyd, M. D’Elia, A. Di Giacomo, and E. Vicari, Phys. Lett. B389, 107 (1996), arXiv:hep- lat/9607049

    work page arXiv 1996

  14. [14]

    Critical slowing down of topological modes

    L. Del Debbio, G. M. Manca, and E. Vicari, Phys. Lett. B594, 315 (2004), arXiv:hep-lat/0403001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  15. [15]

    Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations

    S. Schaefer, R. Sommer, and F. Virotta (ALPHA), Nucl. Phys. B845, 93 (2011), arXiv:1009.5228 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  16. [16]

    Brower, S

    R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, J. W. Negele, and U. J. Wiese, Phys. Lett. B560, 64 (2003), arXiv:hep- lat/0302005

    work page arXiv 2003

  17. [17]

    S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, and T. Onogi, Phys. Rev. D76, 054508 (2007), arXiv:0707.0396 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  18. [18]

    Luscher, P

    M. Luscher, P. Weisz, and U. Wolff, Nucl. Phys. B359, 221 (1991). 15

    work page 1991

  19. [19]

    ’t Hooft, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B153, 141 (1979)

    work page 1979

  20. [20]

    E. I. Bribian, J. L. D. Gol´ an, M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez, and A. Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 951 (2021), arXiv:2107.03747 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    J. L. D. Gol´ an, M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez, and A. Ramos, PoS LA TTICE2021, 310 (2022), arXiv:2111.13092 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    J. L. Dasilva Gol´ an,Topology and volume dependence in SU (N) Yang-Mills theories, Ph.D. thesis, U. Autonoma, Madrid (main) (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Bonanno, J

    C. Bonanno, J. L. Dasilva Gol´ an, M. D’Elia, M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez, and A. Giorgieri, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 916 (2024), arXiv:2403.13607 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Fighting topological freezing in the two-dimensional CP$^{N-1}$ model

    M. Hasenbusch, Phys. Rev. D96, 054504 (2017), arXiv:1706.04443 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    Berni, C

    M. Berni, C. Bonanno, and M. D’Elia, Phys. Rev. D100, 114509 (2019), arXiv:1911.03384 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Bonanno,Lattice determination of the topological susceptibility slopeχ ′ of2dCP N−1 models at largeN,Phys

    C. Bonanno, Phys. Rev. D107, 014514 (2023), arXiv:2212.02330 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Bonanno, G

    C. Bonanno, G. Clemente, M. D’Elia, L. Maio, and L. Parente, JHEP08(2024), 236, arXiv:2404.14151 [hep- lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Bonanno, C

    C. Bonanno, C. Bonati, and M. D’Elia, JHEP03(2021), 111, arXiv:2012.14000 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Bonanno, M

    C. Bonanno, M. D’Elia, B. Lucini, and D. Vadacchino, Phys. Lett. B833, 137281 (2022), arXiv:2205.06190 [hep- lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Bonanno, M

    C. Bonanno, M. D’Elia, and L. Verzichelli, JHEP02 (2024), 156, arXiv:2312.12202 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Bonanno, C

    C. Bonanno, C. Bonati, M. Papace, and D. Vadacchino, JHEP05(2024), 163, arXiv:2402.03096 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Bonanno,The large-Nlimit of the topological susceptibility ofSU(N)Yang-Mills theories via Parallel Tempering on Boundary Conditions,2510.08006

    C. Bonanno, (2025), arXiv:2510.08006 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Gonzalez-Arroyo and M

    A. Gonzalez-Arroyo and M. Okawa, Phys. Rev. D27, 2397 (1983)

    work page 1983

  34. [34]

    Gonzalez-Arroyo and M

    A. Gonzalez-Arroyo and M. Okawa, Phys. Lett. B120, 174 (1983)

    work page 1983

  35. [35]

    Large $N$ reduction with the Twisted Eguchi-Kawai model

    A. Gonzalez-Arroyo and M. Okawa, JHEP07(2010), 043, arXiv:1005.1981 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  36. [36]

    Volume independence for Yang-Mills fields on the twisted torus

    M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, and M. Okawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29, 1445001 (2014), arXiv:1406.5655 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  37. [37]

    Garc´ ıa P´ erez, PoSLA TTICE2019, 276 (2020), arXiv:2001.10859 [hep-lat]

    M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez, PoSLA TTICE2019, 276 (2020), arXiv:2001.10859 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Eguchi and H

    T. Eguchi and H. Kawai, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1063 (1982)

    work page 1982

  39. [39]

    Giusti and M

    L. Giusti and M. L¨ uscher, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 207 (2019), arXiv:1812.02062 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    M. C` e, M. Garcia Vera, L. Giusti, and S. Schaefer, Phys. Lett. B762, 232 (2016), arXiv:1607.05939 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    High-precision scale setting in lattice QCD

    S. Bors´ anyi, S. D¨ urr, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, T. Kurth, L. Lellouch, T. Lippert, and C. Mc- Neile (BMW), JHEP09(2012), 010, arXiv:1203.4469 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  42. [42]

    Butti, M

    P. Butti, M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, K.- I. Ishikawa, and M. Okawa, JHEP07(2022), 074, arXiv:2205.03166 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    The $SU(\infty)$ twisted gradient flow running coupling

    M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, L. Keegan, and M. Okawa, JHEP01(2015), 038, arXiv:1412.0941 [hep- lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    Garc´ ıa P´ erez, A

    M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, and M. Okawa, JHEP04(2021), 230, arXiv:2011.13061 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Tachyonic instabilities in 2+1 dimensional Yang-Mills theory and its connection to Number Theory

    F. Chamizo and A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, J. Phys. A50, 265401 (2017), arXiv:1610.07972 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    The gradient flow coupling in the Schr\"odinger Functional

    P. Fritzsch and A. Ramos, JHEP10(2013), 008, arXiv:1301.4388 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    Lattice QCD without topology barriers

    M. L¨ uscher and S. Schaefer, JHEP07(2011), 036, arXiv:1105.4749 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  48. [48]

    L¨ uscher,Stochastic locality and master-field simulations of very large lattices,EPJ Web Conf.175(2018) 01002 [1707.09758]

    M. L¨ uscher, EPJ Web Conf.175, 01002 (2018), arXiv:1707.09758 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Creutz, Phys

    M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D21, 2308 (1980)

    work page 1980

  50. [50]

    A. D. Kennedy and B. J. Pendleton, Phys. Lett. B156, 393 (1985)

    work page 1985

  51. [51]

    Creutz, Phys

    M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D36, 515 (1987)

    work page 1987

  52. [52]

    The gradient flow running coupling with twisted boundary conditions

    A. Ramos, JHEP11(2014), 101, arXiv:1409.1445 [hep- lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [53]

    E. I. Bribian and M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez, JHEP03(2019), 200, arXiv:1903.08029 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Symanzik improvement of the gradient flow in lattice gauge theories

    A. Ramos and S. Sint, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 15 (2016), arXiv:1508.05552 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    Perturbative contributions to Wilson loops in twisted lattice boxes and reduced models

    M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, and M. Okawa, JHEP10(2017), 150, arXiv:1708.00841 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    Testing volume independence of SU(N) pure gauge theories at large N

    A. Gonzalez-Arroyo and M. Okawa, JHEP12(2014), 106, arXiv:1410.6405 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    M. C` e, C. Consonni, G. P. Engel, and L. Giusti, Phys. Rev. D92, 074502 (2015), arXiv:1506.06052 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    Athenodorou and M

    A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, JHEP12(2021), 082, arXiv:2106.00364 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Bonanno, M

    C. Bonanno, M. Garc´ ıa P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, K.-I. Ishikawa, and M. Okawa, (2025), arXiv:2508.05446 [hep- lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Butti and A

    P. Butti and A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, PoSLA TTICE2023, 381 (2024), arXiv:2311.18696 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Butti,Gauge theories with dynamical adjoint fermions at large-Nc, Ph.D

    P. Butti,Gauge theories with dynamical adjoint fermions at large-Nc, Ph.D. thesis, U. Autonoma, Madrid (main) (2023)

    work page 2023