pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.12533 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-16 · 💻 cs.HC

Experiencing the More-than-Human Through Human Augmentation

Botao 'Amber' Hu , Danlin Huang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 22:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords more-than-human designhuman augmentationeco-phenomenologysensory experienceecological empathynonhuman Umweltdesign principlesembodied experience
0
0 comments X

The pith

Repurposing human augmentation technologies creates temporary first-person experiences that approximate nonhuman sensory worlds to build cross-species ecological care.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a design approach called Experiencing the More-than-Human through Human Augmentation that takes technologies normally used to boost human performance and instead applies them to briefly alter human senses. The goal is to let people experience something closer to how other beings such as bats, moles, fungi, or octopuses perceive their surroundings. This is offered as a practical response to the more-than-human turn in design, which asks for greater attentiveness to nonhuman life despite the known limits of human perception. If the approach works, it would give designers concrete ways to cultivate empathy and care that extend beyond human-centered concerns.

Core claim

Grounded in eco-phenomenology and eco-somatics, the paper claims that human augmentation technologies can be repurposed to modulate the human sensorium and generate temporary embodied experiences that approximate nonhuman Umwelten, thereby cultivating ecological awareness, empathy, and care across species boundaries, as shown through seven design principles and five concrete cases including bat-like echolocation, mole-like tactile navigation, fungal network attunement, octopus-like distributed agency, and an AI perspective on urban data.

What carries the argument

The MtHtHA (or >HtH+) design approach, which repurposes human augmentation technologies to create temporary modulations of the human sensorium that approximate nonhuman sensory experiences.

If this is right

  • Seven design principles guide the creation of embodied experiences that approximate specific nonhuman sensory modes.
  • Five implemented cases demonstrate the approach with distinct nonhuman examples such as echolocation and distributed agency.
  • The method opens implications for aesthetics and everyday design practice that include more-than-human considerations.
  • Such experiences are positioned as tools for building empathy that crosses species boundaries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same augmentation method could be adapted for classroom settings to give students direct sensory simulations of local ecosystems.
  • Combining the approach with accessible consumer devices might allow repeated short sessions that reinforce long-term attitude shifts toward conservation.
  • Testing the experiences in group settings could reveal whether shared participation strengthens collective environmental decision-making.

Load-bearing premise

That temporary changes to human senses through augmentation technologies can produce experiences close enough to nonhuman perspectives to genuinely increase ecological awareness, empathy, and care despite the irreducible gap in phenomenal access.

What would settle it

A controlled study measuring whether people who complete one of the proposed augmented experiences show higher ecological empathy or more pro-environmental behavior afterward than people who receive only information about the same nonhuman species.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.12533 by Botao 'Amber' Hu, Danlin Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: More-than-Human through Human Augmentation (MtHtHA, denoted ">HtH+") is a design practice that expands the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: EchoVision is an immersive art experience using a mixed reality handheld mask to simulate bat echolocation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FeltSight is a star-nosed-mole-inspired system combines custom haptic gloves with a mixed reality headset to extend [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FungiSync is a somaesthetic mixed reality participatory ritual performance that embodies participants to experience [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: TentacUs is an artistic movement ritual inspired by the octopus’s decentralized intelligence to explore collective [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: "City of Sparkles" is an interactive VR data visualization where participants embody an artificial life form to explore a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The recent more-than-human turn in design calls for attentiveness to nonhuman beings. Yet -- as Thomas Nagel's famous ``What is it like to be a bat?'' thought experiment highlights -- human experience is constrained by our own sensorium and an irreducible gap in phenomenal access to nonhuman \emph{Umwelten}. Grounded in eco-phenomenology and eco-somatics, this paper proposes \textbf{Experiencing the More-than-Human through Human Augmentation} (MtHtHA, or ``>HtH+''), a design approach that repurposes human augmentation technologies -- typically aimed at enhancing human capabilities for human optimization -- to create temporary, embodied, first-person experiences that modulate the human sensorium to approximate nonhuman sensory experiences, cultivating ecological awareness, empathy, and care across species boundaries. We articulate seven design principles, report five design cases -- EchoVision (bat-like echolocation), FeltSight (star-nosed-mole tactile navigation), FungiSync (fungal network attunement), TentacUs (octopus-like distributed agency), and City of Sparkles (urban data from an AI's perspective) -- and discuss implications for more-than-human aesthetics and design practice.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes Experiencing the More-than-Human through Human Augmentation (MtHtHA or >HtH+), a design approach grounded in eco-phenomenology that repurposes human augmentation technologies to create temporary, embodied, first-person experiences modulating the human sensorium to approximate nonhuman Umwelten. It articulates seven design principles and reports five design cases—EchoVision (bat-like echolocation), FeltSight (star-nosed-mole tactile navigation), FungiSync (fungal network attunement), TentacUs (octopus-like distributed agency), and City of Sparkles (urban data from an AI perspective)—intended to cultivate ecological awareness, empathy, and care across species boundaries while acknowledging the phenomenal gap from Nagel's bat thought experiment.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work could contribute to HCI and more-than-human design by translating philosophical ideas into actionable design principles and concrete cases that leverage augmentation technologies for interspecies empathy. It offers a structured framework that could influence design practice in environmental ethics and aesthetics, provided the transition from sensory modulation to genuine phenomenal effects is demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Design Cases] Design Cases section: The five design cases are described in terms of their technical implementation and intended experiential qualities, yet the manuscript contains no user studies, pre/post measures, control conditions, or empirical data evaluating whether these experiences produce the claimed cultivation of empathy, awareness, or care. This absence directly undermines the central claim that the approach 'cultivates ecological awareness, empathy, and care across species boundaries.'
  2. [Seven Design Principles] Seven Design Principles section: Although the paper invokes Nagel's irreducible gap and proposes seven principles to guide sensorium modulation, it does not articulate a specific mechanism, theoretical bridge, or falsifiable criterion showing how temporary approximation via augmentation converts altered input into cross-species empathy rather than remaining at the level of aesthetic or metaphorical experience. This is load-bearing for the proposal's effectiveness.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction could more explicitly reference prior HCI work on embodiment and empathy to situate the contribution within the existing literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments. We appreciate the recognition of the framework's potential contribution to HCI and more-than-human design. The feedback highlights key areas where the manuscript's scope and claims can be clarified. We address each major comment below and outline revisions to strengthen the paper while remaining faithful to its conceptual nature.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Design Cases] The five design cases are described in terms of their technical implementation and intended experiential qualities, yet the manuscript contains no user studies, pre/post measures, control conditions, or empirical data evaluating whether these experiences produce the claimed cultivation of empathy, awareness, or care. This absence directly undermines the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of empirical evaluation limits the strength of claims about cultivating empathy and care. The design cases are presented as speculative illustrations of the MtHtHA framework rather than as validated prototypes. The manuscript positions the work as a conceptual contribution translating eco-phenomenological ideas into design principles and examples. In revision, we will add a dedicated Limitations and Future Work subsection that explicitly states the current lack of user studies, acknowledges that the cultivation effects remain hypothesized, and proposes concrete directions for empirical evaluation including pre/post measures of ecological awareness and empathy scales with appropriate controls. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Seven Design Principles] Although the paper invokes Nagel's irreducible gap and proposes seven principles to guide sensorium modulation, it does not articulate a specific mechanism, theoretical bridge, or falsifiable criterion showing how temporary approximation via augmentation converts altered input into cross-species empathy rather than remaining at the level of aesthetic or metaphorical experience.

    Authors: The seven principles are intended to function as the operational mechanism, drawing on eco-phenomenology to structure sensorium modulation toward embodied approximation of nonhuman Umwelten. We recognize that the current text could more explicitly connect these principles to a theoretical bridge distinguishing aesthetic experience from empathetic cultivation. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the principles section to detail this bridge, including how principles emphasize reflective first-person engagement and interspecies attentiveness, and we will discuss potential evaluation criteria such as shifts in phenomenological descriptions while acknowledging the inherent challenges of falsifiability for phenomenal experiences noted by Nagel. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; proposal synthesizes external references into new design framework

full rationale

The paper grounds its MtHtHA proposal in Nagel's 'What is it like to be a bat?' thought experiment and established eco-phenomenology/eco-somatics literature, then articulates seven design principles and reports five illustrative design cases (EchoVision, FeltSight, etc.). No equations, parameter fits, or self-authored prior results are invoked to derive the central claim. The cultivation of empathy via sensorium modulation is presented as a forward-looking design hypothesis rather than a quantity derived by construction from the paper's own inputs or citations. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to self-definition or load-bearing self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on philosophical assumptions about sensory gaps and the feasibility of using augmentation for approximation, with the new design approach itself constituting the primary addition beyond prior literature.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Human experience is constrained by our own sensorium with an irreducible gap in phenomenal access to nonhuman Umwelten
    Explicitly invoked via reference to Nagel's bat thought experiment as the core motivation for the proposed approach.
  • ad hoc to paper Repurposing human augmentation technologies can create temporary embodied experiences that approximate nonhuman sensory experiences and cultivate empathy
    This feasibility premise is introduced as the basis of the MtHtHA design approach without independent empirical grounding in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5508 in / 1513 out tokens · 72516 ms · 2026-05-17T22:29:12.532689+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1996.The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-than-Human World

    David Abram. 1996.The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-than-Human World. Pantheon books, New York. 14•Botao ‘Amber’ Hu and Danlin Huang Amir Amedi, William M Stern, Joan A Camprodon, Felix Bermpohl, Lotfi Merabet, Stephen Rotman, Christopher Hemond, Peter Meijer, and Alvaro Pascual-Leone

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1038/nn1912 Paul Bach-Y-Rita, Carter C

    Shape Conveyed by Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution Activates the Lateral Occipital Complex.Nature Neuroscience10, 6 (June 2007), 687–689. doi:10.1038/nn1912 Paul Bach-Y-Rita, Carter C. Collins, Frank A. Saunders, Benjamin White, and Lawrence Scadden

    work page doi:10.1038/nn1912 2007

  3. [3]

    doi:10.1038/221963a0 Karen Barad

    Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection.Nature221, 5184 (March 1969), 963–964. doi:10.1038/221963a0 Karen Barad. 2006.Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822388128 Genevieve Bell, Mark Blythe, and Phoebe Sengers

    work page doi:10.1038/221963a0 1969

  4. [4]

    doi:10.1145/1067860.1067862 Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden

    Making by Making Strange: Defamiliarization and the Design of Domestic Technologies.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction12, 2 (June 2005), 149–173. doi:10.1145/1067860.1067862 Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden

    work page doi:10.1145/1067860.1067862 2005

  5. [5]

    In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Uncomfortable Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Austin Texas USA, 2005–2014. doi:10.1145/2207676. 2208347 Jane Bennett. 2010.Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press. jstor:10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w doi:10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w Charles S. Brown and Ted Toadvine (Eds.). 2003...

    work page doi:10.1145/2207676 2005

  6. [6]

    2012), 31–49

    Connection to Nature: Children’s Affective Attitude Toward Nature.Environment and Behavior44, 1 (Jan. 2012), 31–49. doi:10.1177/0013916510385082 Aykut Coskun, Nazli Cila, Iohanna Nicenboim, Christopher Frauenberger, Ron Wakkary, Marc Hassenzahl, Clara Mancini, Elisa Giaccardi, and Laura Forlano

    work page doi:10.1177/0013916510385082 2012

  7. [7]

    InCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts

    More-than-Human Concepts, Methodologies, and Practices in HCI. InCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–5. doi:10.1145/3491101.3516503 Thomas Doctor, Olaf Witkowski, Elizaveta Solomonova, Bill Duane, and Michael Levin

    work page doi:10.1145/3491101.3516503

  8. [8]

    Biology, Buddhism, and AI: Care as the Driver of Intelligence.Entropy24, 5 (May 2022),

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    2004.Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction(1

    doi:10.3390/e24050710 Paul Dourish. 2004.Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction(1. mit press paperback ed ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. London. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2024.Speculative Everything, With a new preface by the authors: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT press. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2025.Not Here,...

    work page doi:10.3390/e24050710 2004

  10. [10]

    Stranger in the Mirror: Exploring Somatic Defamiliarization.Sociological Theory42, 2 (June 2024), 181–203. doi:10. 1177/07352751241240527 Douglas C Engelbart

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    InAugmented education in the global age

    Augmenting human intellect: A conceptual framework. InAugmented education in the global age. Routledge, 13–29. Arturo Escobar. 2018.Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822371816 Elisa Giaccardi and Johan Redström

    work page doi:10.1215/9780822371816 2018

  12. [12]

    2020), 33–44

    Technology and More-Than-Human Design.Design Issues36, 4 (Sept. 2020), 33–44. doi:10.1162/ desi_a_00612 Elisa Giaccardi, Johan Redström, and Iohanna Nicenboim

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    doi:10.1080/07370024.2024.2353357 Graciela Guerrero, Fernando José Mateus Da Silva, Antonio Fernández-Caballero, and António Pereira

    The Making(s) of More-than-Human Design: Introduction to the Special Issue on More-than-Human Design and HCI.Human–Computer Interaction40, 1-4 (July 2025), 1–16. doi:10.1080/07370024.2024.2353357 Graciela Guerrero, Fernando José Mateus Da Silva, Antonio Fernández-Caballero, and António Pereira

    work page doi:10.1080/07370024.2024.2353357 2025

  14. [14]

    Augmented Humanity: A Systematic Mapping Review.Sensors22, 2 (Jan. 2022),

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Hansell, William Grassie, Russell Blackford, Nick Bostrom, and Jean-Pierre Dupuy (Eds.)

    doi:10.3390/s22020514 Gregory R. Hansell, William Grassie, Russell Blackford, Nick Bostrom, and Jean-Pierre Dupuy (Eds.). 2011.H±: Transhumanism and Its Critics. Metanexus Institute, Philadelphia, PA. Donna J. Haraway. 2016.Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. jstor:10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q doi:10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q F...

    work page doi:10.3390/s22020514 2011

  16. [16]

    2021), 1214–1228

    Developing a Relationship with Nature and Place: The Potential Role of Forest School.Environmental Education Research 27, 8 (Aug. 2021), 1214–1228. doi:10.1080/13504622.2021.1896679 Hossein Hassani, Emmanuel Sirimal Silva, Stephane Unger, Maedeh TajMazinani, and Stephen Mac Feely

    work page doi:10.1080/13504622.2021.1896679 2021

  17. [17]

    doi:10.3390/ai1020008 Andrew J

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Intelligence Augmentation (IA): What Is the Future?AI1, 2 (April 2020), 143–155. doi:10.3390/ai1020008 Andrew J. Hoffman and Lloyd E. Sandelands

    work page doi:10.3390/ai1020008 2020

  18. [18]

    doi:10.1177/1086026605276197 Kristina Höök

    Getting Right with Nature: Anthropocentrism, Ecocentrism, and Theocentrism.Organization & Environment18, 2 (June 2005), 141–162. doi:10.1177/1086026605276197 Kristina Höök. 2018.Designing with the Body: Somaesthetic Interaction Design. The MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/11481.001.0001 Kristina Höök, Steve Benford, Paul Tennent, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Miquel ...

    work page doi:10.1177/1086026605276197 2005

  19. [19]

    2021), 1–36

    Unpacking Non-Dualistic Design: The Soma Design Case.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction28, 6 (Dec. 2021), 1–36. doi:10.1145/3462448 Kristina Höök, Martin P. Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, and Johanna Mercurio

    work page doi:10.1145/3462448 2021

  20. [20]

    InProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Somaesthetic Appreciation Design. InProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 3131–3142. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858583 Designing-with More-than-Human Through Human Augmentation•15 Davor Horvatić and Tomislav Lipic

    work page doi:10.1145/2858036.2858583 2016

  21. [21]

    Human-Centric AI: The Symbiosis of Human and Artificial Intelligence.Entropy23, 3 (March 2021),

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    doi:10.3390/e23030332 Botao Hu, Yang Liu, and Ran Duan

    work page doi:10.3390/e23030332

  23. [23]

    InACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality

    City of Sparkles. InACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality. ACM, Los Angeles California, 1–1. doi:10.1145/3306449.3328815 Botao Amber Hu, Danlin Huang, Yilan Elan Tao, Xiaobo Aaron Hu, and Rem Rungu Lin

    work page doi:10.1145/3306449.3328815 2019

  24. [24]

    EchoVision

    FungiSync: Merging Cyberdelic Mixed Realities. InProceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Immersive Pavilion. ACM, Vancouver British Columbia Canada, 1–2. doi:10.1145/3721245.3734040 Botao Amber Hu, Jiabao Li, Danlin Huang, Jianan Johanna Liu, Xiaobo Aaron Hu, and Yilan Elan Tao. 2024b. Becoming ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3721245.3734040 2024

  25. [25]

    Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices13, 1 (Dec

    Embodying Eco-Consciousness: Somatics, Aesthetic Practices and Social Action. Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices13, 1 (Dec. 2021), 3–8. doi:10.1386/jdsp_00063_2 Eduardo Kohn. 2013.How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. University of California Press. doi:10.1525/9780520956865 Petra Kuppers. 2022.Eco Soma: Pain and Joy in Speculative...

    work page doi:10.1386/jdsp_00063_2 2021

  26. [26]

    Frontiers in Psychology10 (Dec

    The Computational Boundary of a “Self”: Developmental Bioelectricity Drives Multicellularity and Scale-Free Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology10 (Dec. 2019),

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02688 Susan Loh, Marcus Foth, and Yasu Santo

    work page doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02688 2019

  28. [28]

    2024), 103128

    The More-than-Human Turn in Human-Plant Interaction Design: From Utilitarian Object to Living Co-Inhabitant.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies181 (Jan. 2024), 103128. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103128 Clara Mancini

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103128 2024

  29. [29]

    doi:10.1145/1978822.1978836 Marshmallow Laser Feast

    Animal-Computer Interaction: A Manifesto.Interactions18, 4 (July 2011), 69–73. doi:10.1145/1978822.1978836 Marshmallow Laser Feast

    work page doi:10.1145/1978822.1978836 2011

  30. [30]

    https://marshmallowlaserfeast.com/project/in-the-eyes-of-the-animal/

    In the Eyes of the Animal. https://marshmallowlaserfeast.com/project/in-the-eyes-of-the-animal/. Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 2013.Phenomenology of Perception(0 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203720714 Max More and Natasha Vita-More (Eds.). 2013.The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human...

    work page doi:10.4324/9780203720714 2013

  31. [31]

    What Is It Like to Be a Bat?The Philosophical Review83, 4 (Oct. 1974),

    work page 1974

  32. [32]

    jstor:2183914 doi:10.2307/2183914 New Reality Co

    work page doi:10.2307/2183914

  33. [33]

    InDRS2024: Boston

    More-Than-Human Design in Practice. InDRS2024: Boston. doi:10.21606/drs.2024.114 Iohanna Nicenboim, Doenja Oogjes, Heidi Biggs, and Seowoo Nam

    work page doi:10.21606/drs.2024.114 2024

  34. [34]

    doi:10.1080/07370024.2023.2283535 Elisabet M

    Decentering Through Design: Bridging Posthuman Theory with More-than-Human Design Practices.Human–Computer Interaction40, 1-4 (July 2025), 195–220. doi:10.1080/07370024.2023.2283535 Elisabet M. Nilsson, Wolmet Barendregt, Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Anne-Marie Hansen, Daisy Yoo, and Eva Eriksson

    work page doi:10.1080/07370024.2023.2283535 2025

  35. [35]

    InProceedings of the EduCHI 2025: 7th Annual Symposium on HCI Education

    Navigating a New Direction in HCI Education: Challenges of Teaching More-Than-Human Perspectives. InProceedings of the EduCHI 2025: 7th Annual Symposium on HCI Education. ACM, Bloomington IN USA, 1–7. doi:10.1145/3742901.3742907 Elisabet M. Nilsson, Anne-Marie Hansen, Daisy Yoo, Tilde Bekker, Rikke Hagensby Jensen, and Eva Eriksson

    work page doi:10.1145/3742901.3742907 2025

  36. [36]

    InDesigning Interactive Systems Conference

    Teaching for More-than- human Perspectives in Design – A Pedagogical Pattern Mining Workshop. InDesigning Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, IT University of Copenhagen Denmark, 449–452. doi:10.1145/3656156.3658390 Pat Pataranutaporn. 2024.Cyborg Psychology: The Art & Science of Designing Human-AI Systems that Support Human Flourishing. Massachusetts In...

    work page doi:10.1145/3656156.3658390 2024

  37. [37]

    2019), 131–143

    Human Augmentation: Past, Present and Future.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies131 (Nov. 2019), 131–143. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.008 Ismo Rakkolainen

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.008 2019

  38. [38]

    Augmented Human and Transhuman: What Is the Difference?Augmented Human Research11, 1 (Dec. 2026),

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    doi:10.1007/s41133-025-00089-9 Moon Ribas

    work page doi:10.1007/s41133-025-00089-9

  40. [40]

    InModified(1 ed.), Chris Hables Gray, Heidi J

    Waiting for Earthquakes. InModified(1 ed.), Chris Hables Gray, Heidi J. Figueroa-Sarriera, and Steven Mentor (Eds.). Routledge, 193–196. doi:10.4324/9781351107839-25 Melanie Sehgal and Alex Wilkie (Eds.). 2024.More-Than-Human Aesthetics: Venturing Beyond the Bifurcation of Nature(1 ed.). Bristol University Press. jstor:10.2307/jj.9692635 doi:10.2307/jj.96...

    work page doi:10.4324/9781351107839-25 2024

  41. [41]

    2012), 640–652

    Reading with Sounds: Sensory Substitution Selectively Activates the Visual Word Form Area in the Blind.Neuron76, 3 (Nov. 2012), 640–652. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.026 16•Botao ‘Amber’ Hu and Danlin Huang Yiyang Sun, Ziying Chen, La Luo, and Botao Amber Hu

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.026 2012

  42. [42]

    Tentacus

    I Become Tentacle, We Become "Tentacus": A Mixed Reality Ritual for Distributed Bodies and Collective Minds. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2025 XR. ACM, Hong Kong, 1–2. Thomas Thwaites. 2016.GoatMan: How I Took a Holiday from Being Human(first edition ed.). Princeton Architectural Press, New York. Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing. 2015.The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the...

    work page doi:10.1515/9781400873548 2025

  43. [43]

    1993), 71–72

    Hot Topics-Ubiquitous Computing.Computer26, 10 (Oct. 1993), 71–72. doi:10.1109/2.237456 Alex Wilkie and Mike Michael

    work page doi:10.1109/2.237456 1993

  44. [44]

    doi:10.1080/07370024.2023.2283535 Elisabet M

    The Aesthetics of More-than-Human Design: Speculative Energy Briefs for the Chthulucene.Human– Computer Interaction40, 1-4 (July 2025), 104–116. doi:10.1080/07370024.2023.2276392 Kate Wright

    work page doi:10.1080/07370024.2023.2276392 2025

  45. [45]

    doi:10.1215/22011919-3615514

    Becoming-With.Environmental Humanities5, 1 (May 2014), 277–281. doi:10.1215/22011919-3615514

    work page doi:10.1215/22011919-3615514 2014