Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Stability of current-carrying states in hard-core bosons with long-range hopping on a square lattice

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes, within a mean-field treatment, that hard-core bosons with hopping decaying as r^{-α} lose all stable supercurrents at α=3, and that the critical momentum vanishes with the unusual scaling K_c ∝ (α-3)^{1+α-3}.

desk verdict A credible mean-field result on the collapse of stable supercurrents at α=3; the advertised scaling law is not exactly derived and the DI long-wavelength assumption is unshown, but the paper deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.14260 v2 pith:JHTVHZMU submitted 2025-11-18 cond-mat.quant-gas

Yoshihiro Yabuuchi , Ippei Danshita This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords hard-corebosonslong-rangehoppingsupercurrentstabilitydynamicalinstabilityLandauXYmodelmean-fieldtheorysquarelattice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies whether a superfluid can carry a steady current when particles hop between distant sites with an amplitude decaying as a power law in distance, J(r) ∝ r^{-α}. Working with a mean-field description of the equivalent spin-1/2 XY model on a square lattice, it computes the excitation spectrum of a condensate moving with quasi-momentum K and finds the critical K beyond which the flow is Landau-unstable or dynamically unstable. The central result is that these critical quasi-momenta shrink as α decreases and reach zero at α=3, meaning that for α≤3 the Bose-condensed state cannot support a stable supercurrent. Near α=3, the dynamically unstable critical momentum obeys K_c ∝ (α-3)^{1+(α-3)}, an unusual scaling whose exponent is itself α-dependent. The α=3 case is experimentally relevant because Rydberg-atom arrays realize exactly this dipolar decay rate.

What carries the argument

The central object is the excitation spectrum ω_α(q,K) of the Bose-condensed state, obtained by linearizing the mean-field equations of motion around the steady state φ_j = -K·r_j. Its threshold for dynamical instability is set by the inflection point of the single-particle band ε_α(K) = -(1-n)J γ_α(K), where γ_α(K)=Σ_{l≠0} (a/|r_l|)^α e^{iK·r_l} is the lattice sum encoding the long-range hopping. The paper evaluates γ_α(K) in the continuum limit for small K, using a Bessel-function integral, to extract the scaling of the effective mass m* near α=3.

What would settle it

Compute the excitation spectrum ω_α(q,K) numerically for α just above 3 (say, α=3.05) and locate the wavevector q at which Im ω first becomes nonzero as K increases. If that q is not arbitrarily small but finite, the inflection-point criterion is wrong. Experimentally, prepare a phase twist K in a Rydberg-atom XY simulator at α=3 and measure the lifetime of the winding; the mean-field prediction is decay for any K>0.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within the mean-field theory, the stability of the current-carrying state is governed by the convexity of the single-particle energy band ε_α(K). For a current along x, the band becomes fully convex at α=3; at that point the effective mass m* = (∂²ε_α/∂K²)^{-1} changes sign at K=0, so the sound velocity is imaginary and the condensate is dynamically unstable for any K>0. The paper derives this from the excitation spectrum ω_α(q,K) and shows analytically, using the continuum form of the lattice sum γ_α(K), that the critical momentum vanishes as K_c ∝ Δ^{1+Δ} with Δ=α-3. It also finds that the Landau-instability critical momentum vanishes at the same α, and that the group velocity at K→0 becom

Load-bearing premise

The central conclusion rests on identifying the onset of dynamical instability with the inflection point of the single-particle band ε_α(K), an identification the paper says is numerically confirmed but does not show; if the first unstable modes have finite wavelength, the scaling and the vanishing at α=3 would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For α≤3 the mean-field theory predicts that no stable supercurrent exists: any nonzero quasi-momentum is either Landau- or dynamically unstable, and at α=3 the flow is unstable for arbitrarily small K.
  • In Rydberg-atom arrays, where the dipolar exchange gives α=3, this implies that persistent current states should be absent or very fragile in the ideal hard-core boson model.
  • In the nearest-neighbor limit α→∞ the known critical momentum K_c a=π/2 is recovered, so the result reduces to the standard optical-lattice case.
  • The scaling K_c ∝ Δ^{1+Δ} with Δ=α-3 shows that the critical exponent itself depends on the distance to the critical point, a signature of long-range hopping not present in short-range models.
  • The single-particle band picture predicts negative effective mass in the dynamically unstable region, with imaginary sound velocity, so density perturbations grow exponentially.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A clean falsifier of the mean-field result would be a time-resolved quench experiment in a Rydberg array: prepare a condensate with a small phase twist K at α=3 and watch for decay of the winding; the model predicts even the smallest K is dynamically unstable.
  • The same continuum-integral argument used here should apply to other power-law exponents and geometries; whether the vanishing point shifts away from α=3 on a non-square lattice is an immediate extension.
  • If quantum fluctuations beyond mean field are included, a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless-type analysis could change the conclusion at finite temperature, especially for α≥4 where mean-field order is forbidden.
  • The Landau-instability threshold also vanishes at α=3, so the suppression of stable flow is not an artifact of a single instability mechanism; both criteria point the same way within this approximation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the stability of current-carrying Bose-condensed states in the hard-core Bose-Hubbard model on a square lattice with power-law hopping ∝ r^{-α}. Using the mapping to the spin-1/2 XY model and a product-state mean-field ansatz, the authors derive a closed-form excitation spectrum (Eq. 29), compute Landau and dynamical instability thresholds as functions of α and filling n, and report that the critical quasi-momentum K_c vanishes at α=3. Near α=3 they claim the scaling K_c ∝ Δ^{1+Δ} with Δ=α-3. The central qualitative message is that no stable supercurrent exists for α≤3 within this mean-field treatment, which would include the Rydberg-array case α=3.

Significance. If correct, the vanishing of the supercurrent stability window at α=3 is a clean and experimentally relevant result, and the analytic excitation spectrum is a useful reference for future work. The K=0 limit correctly reproduces earlier spectra, which is a valuable check. The paper is concise and the mean-field derivation is transparent. However, the advertised Δ-dependent scaling law is not derived as stated, and the identification of the dynamical-instability threshold with the single-particle inflection point rests on an unshown numerical assertion. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's headline claims, but they are fixable within the manuscript's scope.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV.C, Eq. (33)] Solving m*^{-1}=0 with the expansion in Eq. (32) does not give K_ca ∝ Δ^{1+Δ} with a constant prefactor. The inflection condition ∂²γ/∂K²=0 yields, for Δ=α-3>0, K_ca = [2A(1+Δ)Δ(1-Δ)]^{1/(1-Δ)} up to the O(η^4) terms. This is not a pure power law: the prefactor depends on Δ, and the local exponent is 1/(1-Δ)=1+Δ+O(Δ²). The abstract and introduction present K_c ∝ Δ^{1+Δ} as the exact scaling form and emphasize a Δ-dependent exponent. The statement is only true asymptotically to leading logarithmic accuracy. Please derive and state the full expression, or explicitly label the result as the leading behavior with local exponent 1+Δ.
  2. [Sec. IV.B, sentence after Eq. (31)] The identification of K_ca with the inflection point of the single-particle band is load-bearing for Eq. (33) and for the conclusion K_c=0 at α=3. The paper states 'Since we numerically confirm that DI ... is caused by normal modes with long wavelength', but no such confirmation is shown. Equation (29) implies that infinitesimal-q modes become dynamically unstable when γ''(K)>0 for q along the current direction, but it does not exclude a finite-q instability for smaller K. If a finite-q mode goes unstable first, the threshold is set by the q-dependent radicand, not by ∂²γ/∂K². Please provide the promised q-resolved numerical evidence (for example, Im ω as a function of q for K values just below and above threshold) or give an analytic argument that the first unstable mode always has q→0.
  3. [Eq. (32)] The continuum expansion for γ_α(K) contains an apparent sign error and an inconsistent treatment of the 2π factor. At η=0, the displayed result gives γ_α(0) ≈ -2π/(α-2) < 0, whereas Eq. (25) gives γ_α(0)=β_α>0. The constant term should be +2π/(α-2). Additionally, the 2π from the angular integration is dropped in the second equality and reinserted in the third. The inflection condition is insensitive to the constant sign, so the final condition is not affected, but the equation as written cannot be verified and needs to be corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 5] The proportionality constants in both analytical curves are fixed by a single data point at α=3.05. Please state the number of independent numerical points and the range over which the comparison is made; with a single normalization point the test mainly checks the shape, not the absolute value.
  2. [Sec. V] Typo: 'quasi-momemta' should be 'quasi-momenta'.
  3. [Fig. 4] The labels 'ω=5', 'ω=3' in the figure appear to denote the decay exponent α, not the frequency. Please use a consistent notation.
  4. [Eq. (29)] It would help the reader if the small-q expansion of Eq. (29) were shown explicitly, since it makes the long-wavelength criterion γ''(K)>0 apparent and would partially replace the unshown numerical confirmation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central K_c(alpha) and scaling claims are derived from the explicit mean-field spectrum and band-curvature asymptotics; the only minor self-citation and one-point prefactor normalization are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central assertions are not circular by construction. The DI critical momentum is defined from the full mean-field excitation spectrum Eq. (29) as the smallest K at which Im[omega] becomes nonzero, and the K=0 limit is checked against Refs. [45,46]. The vanishing at alpha=3 and the scaling form near alpha=3 come from the continuum asymptotics of the band gamma_alpha(K), Eq. (32), not from the fit. The only numerical calibration is the overall constant in Fig. 5: 'The proportionality constants in both analytical curves are fixed so that they reproduce the numerical value of K_c a at alpha=3.05.' This tests the exponent, not the functional form, so it is a mild normalization rather than a fitted prediction. The mean-field method follows Ref. [32], which is co-authored by I. Danshita, but only as a procedural template; the linearized equations are rederived in the paper and the nearest-neighbor limit is benchmarked against external works [20,25,26,28]. Thus Ref. [32] is not load-bearing. I also flag two non-circular correctness concerns, per the reviewing rule: (i) Sec. IV.B asserts 'Since we numerically confirm that DI of the current-carrying state is caused by normal modes with long wavelength, the inflection point of epsilon_alpha(K) corresponds to the critical quasi-momentum' without displaying that numerical confirmation; if the first unstable mode has finite q, the m*^{-1}=0 identification and Eq. (33) would not follow. This is an omitted justification, not a circular reduction. (ii) The quoted result K_c a proportional to Delta^{1+Delta} may not follow from Eq. (32) under the stated small-K inflection-point condition; that would be an internal-consistency or correctness issue, not circularity. Because no step in the derivation reduces to its own input, the appropriate score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. Its main load-bearing assumptions are the mean-field approximation, the identification of DI with band curvature, and the continuum approximation of the long-range hopping near α=3. The only fitted quantity is the scaling prefactor used for visual comparison.

free parameters (1)
  • Scaling prefactor C_K = fixed to match numerical K_c at α=3.05
    In Fig. 5, the proportionality constants in both analytical curves are chosen to reproduce the numerical value at α=3.05. This is a fitted constant used to test the functional form, not a parameter of the model.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Mean-field approximation: the wavefunction is a product state over sites (Eq. 5).
    Used throughout to derive the energy, phase diagram, and excitation spectrum. Mean-field is uncontrolled in 2D, especially near the Mermin-Wagner regime, and the paper itself notes its limits for α≥4 at T>0.
  • ad hoc to paper Dynamical instability is equivalent to the zero of the inverse effective mass (inflection point of ε(K)).
    Stated in Sec. IV.C: 'Since we numerically confirm that DI ... is caused by normal modes with long wavelength, the inflection point ... corresponds to the critical quasi-momentum.' The numerical confirmation is not shown, making this a load-bearing assumption for the scaling analysis.
  • domain assumption The lattice sum γα(K) can be replaced by its continuum integral for small K with the expansion of Eq. (32).
    The scaling law relies on this expansion, which ignores lattice anisotropies and uses a lower cutoff at r=a. The non-analytic term is robust, but the analytic coefficients depend on the cutoff and could affect the prefactor.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stability of current-carrying states in hard-core bosons with long-range hopping on a square lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JHTVHZMU

@misc{pith2026251114260,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stability of current-carrying states in hard-core bosons with long-range hopping on a square lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JHTVHZMU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.14260}
}
abstract

We investigate the stability of current-carrying states with quasi-momentum $K$ in the Bose-condensed phase of the hard-core Bose-Hubbard model on a square lattice, where particles transfer between two sites separated by distance $r$ with hopping amplitude decaying algebraically with $r$ as $\propto r^{-\alpha}$. Using a mean-field theory, we analyze the excitation spectrum and determine the critical quasi-momenta associated with Landau and dynamical instabilities. We find that the long-range hopping suppresses the critical quasi-momenta and makes them vanish at $\alpha=3$. Near $\alpha=3$, we show that the critical quasi-momentum $K_{\mathrm{c}}$ for the dynamical instability exhibits the scaling behavior $K_\mathrm{c} \propto \Delta^{1+\Delta}$ with $\Delta=\alpha-3$, where the scaling exponent explicitly depends on $\Delta$, as a consequence of the long-range nature of the hopping.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.14260 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows the critical field (h/J) c as a function of α. As α decreases, the ordered region expands and (h/J) c diverges at α → 2. It demonstrates that long￾range spin-spin interactions enhance the robustness of the XY ferromagnetic order, which qualitatively agrees with the results of Refs. [38, 44, 45]. In terms of the HCB, this robustness corresponds to an expansion of the region of the Bose-condensed phase for small… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Excitation spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Single-particle energy band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Stability phase diagram of the Bose-condensed state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison between the analytical prediction and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Higgs and Nambu-Goldstone modes in a spin-1 $XY$ model with long-range interactions

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a 2D spin-1 XY model with 1/r^3 interactions, the Higgs mode disperses linearly and its Beliaev damping is strongly suppressed near the quantum critical point, making it observable.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Kapitza, Viscosity of liquid helium below theλ-point, Nature141, 74 (1938)

    P. Kapitza, Viscosity of liquid helium below theλ-point, Nature141, 74 (1938)

    1938

  2. [2]

    J. F. Allen and A. D. Misener, Flow of liquid helium ii, Nature141, 75 (1938)

    1938

  3. [3]

    B. V. Svistunov, E. Babaev, and N. Prokof’ev, Superfluid states of matter (CRC Press, 2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Bose-einstein condensation and superfluidity (Oxford University Press, 2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    K. B. Davis, M. O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Bose-einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3969 (1995)

    1995

  6. [6]

    M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of bose-einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor, Science269, 198 (1995)

    1995

  7. [7]

    K. W. Madison, F. Chevy, W. Wohlleben, and J. Dal- ibard, Vortex formation in a stirred bose-einstein con- densate, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 806 (2000)

    2000

  8. [8]

    J. R. Abo-Shaeer, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, and W. Ket- terle, Observation of vortex lattices in bose-einstein con- densates, Science292, 476 (2001)

    2001

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Chauveau, C

    G. Chauveau, C. Maury, F. Rabec, C. Heintze, G. Brochier, S. Nascimbene, J. Dalibard, J. Beugnon, S. M. Roccuzzo, and S. Stringari, Superfluid fraction in an interacting spatially modulated bose-einstein conden- sate, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 226003 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Ramanathan, K

    A. Ramanathan, K. C. Wright, S. R. Muniz, M. Zelan, W. T. Hill, C. J. Lobb, K. Helmerson, W. D. Phillips, and G. K. Campbell, Superflow in a toroidal bose-einstein condensate: An atom circuit with a tunable weak link, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 130401 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    K. C. Wright, R. B. Blakestad, C. J. Lobb, W. D. Phillips, and G. K. Campbell, Driving phase slips in a superfluid atom circuit with a rotating weak link, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 025302 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    Raman, M

    C. Raman, M. K¨ ohl, R. Onofrio, D. S. Durfee, C. E. Kuklewicz, Z. Hadzibabic, and W. Ketterle, Evidence for a critical velocity in a bose-einstein condensed gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2502 (1999)

    1999

  5. [13]

    Desbuquois, L

    R. Desbuquois, L. Chomaz, T. Yefsah, J. L´ eonard, J. Beugnon, C. Weitenberg, and J. Dalibard, Superfluid behaviour of a two-dimensional bose gas, Nature Physics 8, 645 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    F. S. Cataliotti, S. Burger, C. Fort, P. Maddaloni, F. Mi- nardi, A. Trombettoni, A. Smerzi, and M. Inguscio, Josephson junction arrays with bose-einstein conden- sates, Science293, 843 (2001)

    2001

  7. [15]

    Burger, F

    S. Burger, F. S. Cataliotti, C. Fort, F. Minardi, M. Ingus- cio, M. L. Chiofalo, and M. P. Tosi, Superfluid and dissi- pative dynamics of a bose-einstein condensate in a peri- odic optical potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 4447 (2001)

    2001

  8. [16]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415, 39 (2002)

    2002

  9. [17]

    Fallani, L

    L. Fallani, L. De Sarlo, J. E. Lye, M. Modugno, R. Saers, C. Fort, and M. Inguscio, Observation of dynamical in- stability for a bose-einstein condensate in a moving 1d optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 140406 (2004)

    2004

  10. [18]

    De Sarlo, L

    L. De Sarlo, L. Fallani, J. E. Lye, M. Modugno, R. Saers, C. Fort, and M. Inguscio, Unstable regimes for a bose- einstein condensate in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 72, 013603 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    C. D. Fertig, K. M. O’Hara, J. H. Huckans, S. L. Rol- ston, W. D. Phillips, and J. V. Porto, Strongly inhibited transport of a degenerate 1d bose gas in a lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 120403 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    J. Mun, P. Medley, G. K. Campbell, L. G. Marcassa, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Phase diagram for a bose-einstein condensate moving in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 150604 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    McKay, M

    D. McKay, M. White, M. Pasienski, and B. De- Marco, Phase-slip-induced dissipation in an atomic bose– hubbard system, Nature453, 76 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Haller, R

    E. Haller, R. Hart, M. J. Mark, J. G. Danzl, L. Re- ichs¨ ollner, M. Gustavsson, M. Dalmonte, G. Pupillo, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Pinning quantum phase transition for a lut- tinger liquid of strongly interacting bosons, Nature466, 597 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Gadway, D

    B. Gadway, D. Pertot, J. Reeves, M. Vogt, and D. Schneble, Glassy behavior in a binary atomic mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 145306 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Tanzi, S

    L. Tanzi, S. Scaffidi Abbate, F. Cataldini, L. Gori, 8 E. Lucioni, M. Inguscio, G. Modugno, and C. D’Errico, Velocity-dependent quantum phase slips in 1d atomic su- perfluids, Scientific Reports6, 25965 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Smerzi, A

    A. Smerzi, A. Trombettoni, P. G. Kevrekidis, and A. R. Bishop, Dynamical superfluid-insulator transition in a chain of weakly coupled bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 170402 (2002)

    2002

  18. [26]

    Wu and Q

    B. Wu and Q. Niu, Superfluidity of bose-einstein con- densate in an optical lattice: Landau-zener tunnelling and dynamical instability, New Journal of Physics5, 104 (2003)

    2003

  19. [27]

    Altman, A

    E. Altman, A. Polkovnikov, E. Demler, B. I. Halperin, and M. D. Lukin, Superfluid-insulator transition in a moving system of interacting bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 020402 (2005)

    2005

  20. [28]

    Polkovnikov, E

    A. Polkovnikov, E. Altman, E. Demler, B. Halperin, and M. D. Lukin, Decay of superfluid currents in a moving system of strongly interacting bosons, Phys. Rev. A71, 063613 (2005)

    2005

  21. [29]

    Konabe and T

    S. Konabe and T. Nikuni, Instability of a superfluid bose gas induced by a locked thermal gas in an optical lat- tice, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Opti- cal Physics39, S101 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    Iigaya, S

    K. Iigaya, S. Konabe, I. Danshita, and T. Nikuni, Lan- dau damping: Instability mechanism of superfluid bose gases moving in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A74, 053611 (2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    Snoek and W

    M. Snoek and W. Hofstetter, Two-dimensional dynamics of ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A76, 051603 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Danshita and D

    I. Danshita and D. Yamamoto, Critical velocity of flowing supersolids of dipolar bose gases in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A82, 013645 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    Yamamoto and I

    D. Yamamoto and I. Danshita, Stability of superflow in supersolid phases of lattice bosons with dipole-dipole in- teraction, Journal of Physics: Conference Series273, 012020 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Saito, I

    T. Saito, I. Danshita, T. Ozaki, and T. Nikuni, Detecting the superfluid critical momentum of bose gases in opti- cal lattices through dipole oscillations, Phys. Rev. A86, 023623 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Jaksch, C

    D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3108 (1998)

    1998

  28. [36]

    M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B40, 546 (1989)

    1989

  29. [37]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. We- ber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with rydberg atoms, Science365, 775 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V. S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee,et al., Continuous symmetry breaking in a two-dimensional rydberg array, Nature616, 691 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    C. Chen, G. Emperauger, G. Bornet, F. Caleca, B. G´ ely, M. Bintz, S. Chatterjee, V. Liu, D. Barredo, N. Y. Yao, T. Lahaye, F. Mezzacapo, T. Roscilde, and A. Browaeys, Spectroscopy of elementary excitations from quench dy- namics in a dipolar xy rydberg simulator, Science389, ...

    2025

  32. [40]

    Richerme, Z.-X

    P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss-Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions, Nature 511, 198 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    Jurcevic, B

    P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Quasiparticle engineering and entanglement propagation in a quantum many-body sys- tem, Nature511, 202 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    Kotibhaskar, C.-Y

    N. Kotibhaskar, C.-Y. Shih, S. Motlakunta, A. Vogliano, L. Hahn, Y.-T. Chen, and R. Islam, Programmable xy- type couplings through parallel spin-dependent forces on the same trapped ion motional modes, Physical Review Research6, 033038 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Matsubara and H

    T. Matsubara and H. Matsuda, A lattice model of liquid helium, i, Progress of Theoretical Physics16, 569 (1956)

    1956

  36. [44]

    J. R. de Sousa, Phase diagram in the quantum xy model with long-range interactions, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems43, 93 (2005)

    2005

  37. [45]

    Peter, S

    D. Peter, S. M¨ uller, S. Wessel, and H. P. B¨ uchler, Anoma- lous behavior of spin systems with dipolar interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 025303 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    O. K. Diessel, S. Diehl, N. Defenu, A. Rosch, and A. Chiocchetta, Generalized higgs mechanism in long- range-interacting quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033038 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Bruno, Absence of spontaneous magnetic order at nonzero temperature in one- and two-dimensional heisen- berg andXYsystems with long-range interactions, Phys

    P. Bruno, Absence of spontaneous magnetic order at nonzero temperature in one- and two-dimensional heisen- berg andXYsystems with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 137203 (2001)

    2001

  40. [48]

    van Oosten, P

    D. van Oosten, P. van der Straten, and H. T. C. Stoof, Quantum phases in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A63, 053601 (2001)

    2001

  41. [49]

    Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions, Physics World 12, 33 (1999)

    S. Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions, Physics World 12, 33 (1999)

    1999

  42. [50]

    Kr¨ amer, C

    M. Kr¨ amer, C. Menotti, L. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Bose-einstein condensates in 1d optical lattices, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal D - Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics27, 247 (2003)

    2003

  43. [51]

    Gupta, G

    T. Gupta, G. Masella, F. Mattiotti, N. V. Prokof’ev, and G. Pupillo, Scale-invariant phase transition of disordered bosons in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B111, L020503 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.