Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Multiphoton ionization with three-dimensional light fields

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bichromatic non-collinear 3D light fields create free-electron angular momentum wave packets in potassium, unlocking every dipole transition in multiphoton ionization.

desk verdict First experimental 3D-vectorial-field MPI with clean PMD fingerprints across five configurations, but the m-decomposition rests on a truncated partial-wave model that skips a potentially relevant p-wave channel. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.19290 v1 pith:CGZETHW6 submitted 2025-11-24 physics.atom-ph

Darius Köhnke , Hans-Christian Ahlswede , Tim Bayer , Matthias Wollenhaupt This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords multiphotonionizationthree-dimensionallightfieldspolarizationshapingphotoelectronmomentumdistributionscoherentcontrolspin-orbitwavepacketsvelocity-mapimagingREMPI
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first experimental creation of free-electron angular momentum wave packets through atomic multiphoton ionization driven by bichromatic three-dimensional (3D) polarization-tailored light. By superposing two non-collinear pulses of different colors, the field gains components along all spatial axes, giving access to every dipole transition Δm = 0, ±1. The measured photoelectron momentum distributions match simulations of coherent superpositions of partial waves spanning all m = −3 to +3, demonstrating control that planar polarization fields cannot provide. The same scheme is used as a 3D pump–probe to image spin–orbit wave packet precession in the potassium 3d fine structure doublet. If correct, the approach provides a practical route to chiral-sensitive light–matter interactions and ultrafast spectroscopy with fully controlled 3D fields.

What carries the argument

The central object is the non-collinear bichromatic 3D field: two polarization-shaped pulses of different colors intersect at 45°, producing electric-field components along all three spatial axes. In the spherical basis its transverse parts drive σ± transitions and the longitudinal part drives π transitions, so all dipole selection rules Δm = 0, ±1 are active. The (2+1) REMPI pathway (two red photons plus one blue photon) is resonantly enhanced by the potassium 3d state, generating a low-energy photoelectron wave packet whose partial-wave expansion ψ(N)(ε,Ω) = Σ_m a_{N,m}(ε) Y_{N,m}(Ω) is directly compared to measured momentum distributions.

What would settle it

Measure the photoelectron spectrum across the 0.05 eV region with high energy resolution: any additional peaks between the single-color signals would indicate competing mixing pathways. Alternatively, repeat the measurement with the blue wavelength tuned off the 3d resonance; a significant change in the low-energy PMD would show that the resonant pathway is not the sole contributor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors establish that a 3D light field formed by the non-collinear overlap of two polarization-shaped fs pulses, one red (929 nm) and one blue (720 nm), drives (2+1) resonance-enhanced multiphoton ionization of potassium through a pathway that accesses all seven magnetic sublevel continua |f,m⟩ (m = −3,...,+3). The low-energy photoelectron wave packet at ε ≈ 0.05 eV is shown, via velocity-map imaging and comparison with simulations, to be a coherent superposition of partial waves whose m-decomposition depends on the polarization configuration (PLP, COCP, CRCP, RLBC, RCBL). This full access to Δm = 0, ±1 selection rules, impossible with planar fields, is the paper's central discovery. In

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation of the low-energy signal as a pure (2+1) REMPI wave packet depends on the two-red-one-blue pathway dominating the region of interest; if other pathways contribute significantly, the extracted m-distributions would be contaminated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All magnetic sublevels of the continuum can be populated and coherently superposed, so photoelectron wave packets with full angular momentum content are experimentally accessible.
  • The non-collinear pump–probe geometry images spin–orbit dynamics with directional sensitivity, as demonstrated by the time-evolving PMDs over one 14.45 ps precession period.
  • The scheme extends to other atoms and molecules, providing a platform for chiral-sensitive light–matter interactions and symmetry-breaking excitation.
  • Reference single-color measurements and simulations confirm that the observed low-energy PMDs originate from the two-red-one-blue pathway, enabling background-free detection.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same 3D-field geometry could be used to create chiral photoelectron wave packets in atoms without chiral targets, offering a testbed for chiroptical effects in the continuum.
  • Detuning the blue wavelength away from the 3d resonance would weaken the REMPI enhancement; comparing PMDs at several detunings could confirm the dominance assumption and quantify any background contamination.
  • Full 3D reconstruction of the photoelectron distributions, which the paper notes will require emerging 3D imaging techniques, would allow direct extraction of the a_{N,m}(ε) amplitudes rather than inference from 2D projections.
  • Extending the pulse shaper to more than two colors could generate 3D fields with richer symmetry, potentially enabling control of higher-order angular momentum moments of the photoelectron distribution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments on multiphoton ionization of potassium with bichromatic three-dimensional (3D) light fields produced by the non-collinear superposition of two polarization-shaped pulses of different colors. The authors measure photoelectron momentum distributions (PMDs) via velocity-map imaging for five polarization configurations of the 3D field and focus on a low-energy region attributed to a (2+1) REMPI pathway through the potassium 3d state. They claim that the 3D field unlocks all dipole selection rules Δm=0,±1, enabling coherent superposition states spanning all seven |f,m⟩ continua, and demonstrate a pump-probe application that images spin-orbit wave packet dynamics in the 3d fine-structure doublet. The experimental setup and the observed configuration-dependent PMD structures are qualitatively compelling, and the paper provides a plausible demonstration of a new coherent-control capability. However, the quantitative support for the central claims is incomplete, and the partial-wave model used to analyze the data omits physically allowed lower-l continuum channels without justification.

Significance. If the claims are substantiated, this work represents a significant experimental advance: the first shaper-based realization of fully controllable 3D vectorial femtosecond fields for atomic multiphoton ionization. The non-collinear superposition approach is versatile and could enable the experimental implementation of recently proposed enantio-sensitive schemes. The observation of 3D-structured PMDs that vary systematically with the field configuration is a valuable result in itself. Nevertheless, the load-bearing evidence for the specific claim that all seven |f,m⟩ continua are accessed rests on a truncated partial-wave analysis whose validity is not established. The paper currently lacks the quantitative rigor needed to support its strongest conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (2) and Fig. 3] The model assumes the (2+1) REMPI photoelectron wave packet is a pure f-wave superposition (l=N=3). However, one-photon ionization from the 3d intermediate state also allows l=1 continuum channels. At the ROI center ε_3D=0.05 eV, Wigner threshold laws strongly suppress l=3 relative to l=1, so the p-wave may be non-negligible or dominant. Fano's propensity rule [37] is a qualitative tendency, not a rigorous equality, and its applicability to a resonant two-photon excitation plus one-photon ionization path is not established. Because the simulations and the m-amplitude extraction use the same truncated basis, the agreement between measured and simulated PMDs cannot validate the truncation. The authors should include l=1 partial waves in the expansion or provide quantitative evidence, e.g., from a full calculation or energy-dependent measurements, that the p-wave contribution is negligible
  2. [Fig. 3 insets and 'Analysis of the measured PMDs'] The procedure for extracting the m-amplitudes a_{N,m}(ε) from the VMI images is not described. No error bars, no goodness-of-fit metrics, and no discussion of the sensitivity of the decomposition to noise or to the choice of basis are provided. The statement of 'excellent agreement' is therefore not quantitatively supported. Since the m-decomposition is the central evidence for the claim of full 3D coherent control, the paper should detail the fitting algorithm, report uncertainties (including systematic uncertainties from the partial-wave truncation), and assess the robustness of the extracted m-distributions.
  3. [Fig. 4 and pump-probe discussion] The time-resolved PMDs in the spin-orbit wave packet experiment are interpreted qualitatively. The identification of the evolution from |3d,0⟩ to |3d,±1⟩ relies on visual similarity of the PMD shapes to the static results. Without quantitative comparison to a model of the expected time-dependent m-distributions, or at least error estimates on the measured distributions, the claim that the dynamics are 'mapped' into the continuum is not fully established. This application section would benefit from a more quantitative analysis, e.g., extracting the time-dependent m-amplitudes and comparing to the expected precession period.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] Typographical errors and formatting issues: '3dfine' should be '3d fine'; 'the the characteristic' in the paragraph on Fig. 4; the author line contains multiple 'and' and misplaced asterisks; 'K¨ ohnke' and 'Ahlswede' have encoding artifacts.
  2. [Fig. 2] The spatial images in panel (b) lack scale bars or axis labels, making it difficult to judge the overlap region. The text mentions 'bright spot' but does not indicate the intensity scale.
  3. [RLBC/RCBL paragraph] The sentence 'In our 2+1 REMPI scheme, a single ionization pathway is strongly enhanced, allowing us to choose a suitable reference frame such that a single |3d, m⟩-state is excited by the red pulse' is confusing. It is not clear whether 'single ionization pathway' refers to the resonant (2+1) path or to a single bound-state sublevel; please rephrase for clarity.
  4. [Coordinate frames] The paper switches between the 'common reference frame' (bisector of propagation axes) and the 'reference frame aligned with the red pulse' for RLBC/RCBL. The transformation between these frames and its effect on the m-decomposition are not specified. Define both frames mathematically and explain how the plotted m-distributions are obtained in each case.
  5. [Energy calibration] The calibration of the VMI energy scale and the determination of the ROI center at 0.05 eV are not described. A brief description or a reference to the methods in [38] would help the reader assess the separation of the (2+1) REMPI signal from single-color backgrounds.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The m-decomposition is read out of the same Eq. (2) that generated the simulated PMDs; its 'validation' is a consistency check, not an independent test.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Results section, Fig. 3 paragraph (p. 3)]
    "The second row shows the measured VMI images within the ROI, which are compared to simulated photoelectron projections (third row) and the corresponding 3D PMDs (fourth row) obtained from Eq. (2). The close agreement across all five configurations validates our model and provides the basis for a more detailed analysis. The bar plot insets next to the 3D PMDs display the m-partial wave amplitudes (cf. Eq. (2)) in the common reference frame defined by the z-axis oriented along the bisector of the two propagation axes."

    Equation (2) defines the simulated PMD as a superposition with unknown coefficients a_{N,m}(ε). The paper gives no independent route for these coefficients; the same equation is used to generate the simulated ROI images and to read out the m-partial wave amplitudes shown in the insets. If a_{N,m} are adjusted to match the measured ROI images, the agreement is built in, and the insets are a restatement of the fit, not an independent validation. Consequently 'close agreement ... validates our model' and 'the m-decompositions demonstrate that all target states are accessed' reduce to the assumption that Eq. (2) with the chosen amplitudes describes the data.

  2. other [Theory paragraph introducing Eq. (2), p. 2]
    "According to Fano’s propensity rule [37], the total photoelectron wave function for N-photon ionization from the l = 0 ground state is expressed as a superposition of angular momentum partial waves ψ(N) (ε,Ω) = sum_{m=-N}^{N} a_{N,m}(ε) Y_{N,m}(Ω)."

    Fano’s rule is a propensity for l=N dominance, not an exact angular-momentum selection rule. For the resonant (2+1) pathway the blue photon ionizes a 3d state, so a p-wave (l=1) continuum is dipole allowed and, near threshold, often favored by Wigner scaling. By truncating to Y_{3,m} alone, the model presupposes that the continuum is purely f; the extracted m-distribution then cannot independently establish the paper’s central claim that 'all seven |f,m⟩ continua' are accessed. The citation does not supply the truncation; the truncation is an input, not a derived result.

full rationale

The paper’s central observable is the m-decomposition of the low-energy ROI. The only stated procedure for obtaining it is Eq. (2): the same expansion is used to generate the simulated 2D projections/3D PMDs and to define the inset m-amplitudes. Because the amplitudes a_{N,m} are the free parameters of that expansion, and the manuscript reports no independent, parameter-free calculation of them, the close agreement between measurement and simulation does not validate the m-decomposition; it is a consistency check on a fit. This is the main circular element. The second issue is the justification of Eq. (2) itself: Fano’s propensity rule is cited as if it proved l = N is the only partial wave, but for the resonant (2+1) pathway the final one-photon ionization of the 3d state permits l = 1 as well as l = 3. Thus the model’s basis set already contains the conclusion that all accessed continua are |f,m⟩. The diversity of shapes across five configurations and the standard dipole selection rules give independent content to the experiment, so this is not a complete collapse: the 3D geometry genuinely creates the field components that make Δm = 0,±1 available, and the five data sets are not all trivially the same. The self-citations ([15], [33], [38], [41]) concern apparatus and a previously used SOWP analysis; they are not used as a uniqueness theorem and do not by themselves make the argument circular. Score 6 reflects a partial circularity: the headline claim about m-access and the validating simulations share the same fitted expansion.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central interpretation depends on a handful of assumptions. The most consequential is that the measured PMDs are faithfully described by a coherent partial-wave superposition (Eq. 2) with amplitudes that are at least partly fitted to the data; this introduces free parameters. The dipole selection rules and the 3d resonance enhancement are standard but load-bearing domain assumptions. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Partial-wave amplitudes a_{N,m}(ε) = not stated (bar plot only)
    The simulations shown in Fig. 3 are generated from Eq. (2); the m-amplitudes are not derived from first principles and likely fitted to reproduce the measured VMI images, making them free parameters per configuration.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Fano partial-wave expansion (Eq. 2): N-photon ionization from an l=0 ground state yields a superposition of partial waves with angular momentum N.
    Invoked as the basis for simulating PMDs and extracting m-decompositions.
  • domain assumption Dipole approximation and selection rules Δm = 0, ±1 for the transverse (σ±) and longitudinal (π) field components.
    Used to argue that 3D fields unlock all magnetic sublevels; standard in atomic physics but essential to the interpretation.
  • domain assumption The (2+1) REMPI pathway via the potassium 3d state dominates the low-energy ROI and single-color signals are background-free.
    Stated in the text; if this fails, the measured PMDs are attributed to the wrong ionization pathway.
  • domain assumption VMI images of the ROI are 2D projections of a coherent superposition wave packet described by Eq. (2).
    The comparison between measured VMI images and simulated projections assumes this model is the correct description of the electron wave packet.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiphoton ionization with three-dimensional light fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CGZETHW6

@misc{pith2026251119290,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiphoton ionization with three-dimensional light fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CGZETHW6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.19290}
}
abstract

We report the first observation of free-electron angular momentum wave packets generated by atomic multiphoton ionization with bichromatic three-dimensional (3D) polarization-tailored ultrashort laser fields. These fields, created by the non-collinear superposition of two polarization-shaped pulses of different colors from a supercontinuum polarization pulse shaper, provide electric-field components along all spatial directions. The resulting photoelectron momentum distributions, recorded via velocity map imaging, demonstrate full 3D coherent control of electronic superposition states extending beyond the constraints of planar polarization fields by unlocking all dipole selection rules $\Delta m = 0,\pm1$. As an application, 3D pump-probe fields are used to image previously unobserved photoelectron wave packets mapping spin-orbit dynamics of the potassium $3d$ fine structure doublet. Our shaper-based approach establishes a route to fully controllable 3D light fields for chiral-sensitive light-matter interactions and ultrafast spectroscopy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.19290 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Simplified (left) and detailed (right) bichromatic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Measured optical spectra. (b) VMI images [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. First row: 3D fields for the PLP, COCP, CRCP, RLBC and RCBL configuration. Second row: Measured VMI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time series of VMI images from the non-collinear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references

  1. [41]

    Bayer, D

    T. Bayer, D. Gr¨ afing, S. Kerbstadt, D. Pengel, K. Eick- hoff, L. Englert, and M. Wollenhaupt, Time-resolved 3D imaging of ultrafast spin-orbit wave packet dynamics, New J. Phys.21, 033001 (2019)

    2019

  2. [37]

    Fano, Propensity rules – an analytical approach, Phys

    U. Fano, Propensity rules – an analytical approach, Phys. Rev. A32, 617 (1985)

    1985

  3. [1]

    S. A. Rice and M. Zhao,Optical Control of Molecular Dynamics(Wiley, New York, 2000)

    2000

  4. [2]

    Shapiro and P

    M. Shapiro and P. Brumer,Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes, Vol. 1 (John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2003)

    2003

  5. [3]

    Goswami, Optical pulse shaping approaches to coher- ent control, Phys

    D. Goswami, Optical pulse shaping approaches to coher- ent control, Phys. Rep.374, 385 (2003)

    2003

  6. [4]

    Tannor,Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A Time-Dependent Perspective(University Science Books, Sausalito, 2007)

    D. Tannor,Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A Time-Dependent Perspective(University Science Books, Sausalito, 2007)

    2007

  7. [5]

    Rubinsztein-Dunlop, A

    H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, A. Forbes, M. V. Berry, M. R. Dennis, D. L. Andrews, M. Mansuripur, C. Denz, C. Alp- mann, P. Banzer, and T. Bauer, Roadmap on structured light, Journal of Optics19, 013001 (2016)

    2016

  8. [6]

    Y. Shen, X. Wang, Z. Xie, C. Min, X. Fu, Q. Liu, M. Gong, and X. Yuan, Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities, Light: Science & Applications8, 1 (2019)

    2019

Show all 41 references
  1. [7]

    Forbes, M

    A. Forbes, M. de Oliveira, and M. R. Dennis, Structured light, Nature Photonics15, 253 (2021)

    2021

  2. [8]

    A. M. Weiner, Ultrafast optical pulse shaping: A tutorial review, Opt. Comm.284, 3669 (2011)

    2011

  3. [9]

    Monmayrant, S

    A. Monmayrant, S. Weber, and B. Chatel, A newcomer’s guide to ultrashort pulse shaping and characterization, J. Phys. B43, 103001 (2010)

    2010

  4. [10]

    K¨ ohler, M

    J. K¨ ohler, M. Wollenhaupt, T. Bayer, C. Sarpe, and T. Baumert, Zeptosecond precision pulse shaping, Opt. Express19, 11638 (2011)

    2011

  5. [11]

    A. M. Weiner, Femtosecond pulse shaping using spatial light modulators, Rev. Sci. Instrum.71, 1929 (2000)

    1929

  6. [12]

    Brixner, G

    T. Brixner, G. Krampert, T. Pfeifer, R. Selle, G. Ger- ber, M. Wollenhaupt, O. Graefe, C. Horn, D. Liese, and T. Baumert, Quantum control by ultrafast polarization shaping, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 208301 (2004)

    2004

  7. [13]

    Dudovich, D

    N. Dudovich, D. Oron, and Y. Silberberg, Quantum con- trol of the angular momentum distribution in multipho- ton absorption processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 103003 (2004)

    2004

  8. [14]

    Manzoni, O

    C. Manzoni, O. D. M¨ ucke, G. Cirmi, S. Fang, J. Moses, S.-W. Huang, K.-H. Hong, G. Cerullo, and F. X. K¨ art- ner, Coherent pulse synthesis: towards sub-cycle optical waveforms, Laser Photonics Rev.9, 129 (2015)

    2015

  9. [15]

    Kerbstadt, D

    S. Kerbstadt, D. Timmer, L. Englert, T. Bayer, and M. Wollenhaupt, Ultrashort polarization-tailored bichro- matic fields from a CEP-stable white light supercontin- uum, Opt. Express25, 12518 (2017)

    2017

  10. [16]

    Ivanov and E

    M. Ivanov and E. Pisanty, High-harmonic generation: Taking control of polarization, Nat. Photon.8, 501 (2014)

    2014

  11. [17]

    Bauer, P

    T. Bauer, P. Banzer, E. Karimi, S. Orlov, A. Rubano, L. Marrucci, E. Santamato, R. W. Boyd, and G. Leuchs, Observation of optical polarization m¨ obius strips, Science 347, 964 (2015)

    2015

  12. [18]

    Ayuso, A

    D. Ayuso, A. F. Ordonez, M. Ivanov, and O. Smirnova, Ultrafast optical rotation in chiral molecules with ultra- short and tightly focused beams, Optica8, 1243 (2021)

    2021

  13. [19]

    S. A. J. Druet and J.-P. E. Taran, Cars spectroscopy, Prog. Quant. Electr.7, 1 (1981)

    1981

  14. [20]

    Cerullo, A

    G. Cerullo, A. Baltuska, O. D. M¨ ucke, and C. Vozzi, Few- 6 optical-cycle light pulses with passive carrier-envelope phase stabilization, Laser Photonics Rev.5, 323 (2011)

    2011

  15. [21]

    D. D. Hickstein, F. J. Dollar, P. Grychtol, J. L. El- lis, R. Knut, C. Hernandez-Garcia, D. Zusin, C. Gen- try, J. M. Shaw, T. T. Fan, K. M. Dorney, A. Becker, A. Jaron-Becker, H. C. Kapteyn, M. M. Murnane, and C. G. Durfee, Non-collinear generation of angularly iso- lated cir...

    2015

  16. [22]

    Ayuso, O

    D. Ayuso, O. Neufeld, A. F. Ordonez, P. Decleva, G. Lerner, O. Cohen, M. Ivanov, and O. Smirnova, Syn- thetic chiral light for efficient control of chiral light- matter interaction, Nat. Phot.13, 866 (2019)

    2019

  17. [23]

    Neufeld, D

    O. Neufeld, D. Ayuso, P. Decleva, M. Y. Ivanov, O. Smirnova, and O. Cohen, Ultrasensitive chiral spec- troscopy by dynamical symmetry breaking in high har- monic generation, Phys. Rev. X9, 031002 (2019)

    2019

  18. [24]

    Wanie, E

    V. Wanie, E. Bloch, E. P. M ˚ ansson, L. Colaizzi, S. Ryabchuk, K. Saraswathula, A. F. Ordonez, D. Ayuso, O. Smirnova, A. Trabattoni, V. Blanchet, N. Ben Amor, M.-C. Heitz, Y. Mairesse, B. Pons, and F. Calegari, Capturing electron-driven chiral dynamics in uv-excited molecules...

    2024

  19. [25]

    Sparling and D

    C. Sparling and D. Townsend, Two decades of imaging photoelectron circular dichroism: from first principles to future perspectives, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.27, 2888 (2025)

    2025

  20. [26]

    Ayuso, A

    D. Ayuso, A. F. Ordonez, and O. Smirnova, Ultrafast chirality: the road to efficient chiral measurements, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.24, 26962 (2022)

    2022

  21. [27]

    Neufeld, H

    O. Neufeld, H. H¨ ubener, A. Rubio, and U. De Giovannini, Strong chiral dichroism and enantiopurification in above- threshold ionization with locally chiral light, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L032006 (2021)

    2021

  22. [28]

    Habibovi´ c, K

    D. Habibovi´ c, K. R. Hamilton, O. Neufeld, and L. Rego, Emerging tailored light sources for studying chirality and symmetry, Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 663 (2024)

    2024

  23. [29]

    A. F. Ordonez and O. Smirnova, Propensity rules in pho- toelectron circular dichroism in chiral molecules. i. chiral hydrogen, Phys. Rev. A99, 043416 (2019)

    2019

  24. [30]

    Mayer, S

    N. Mayer, S. Patchkovskii, F. Morales, M. Ivanov, and O. Smirnova, Imprinting chirality on atoms using syn- thetic chiral light fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 243201 (2022)

    2022

  25. [31]

    G. P. Katsoulis, Z. Dube, P. B. Corkum, A. Staudte, and A. Emmanouilidou, Momentum scalar triple product as a measure of chirality in electron ionization dynamics of strongly driven atoms, Phys. Rev. A106, 043109 (2022)

    2022

  26. [32]

    Geyer, J

    A. Geyer, J. Stindl, I. Dwojak, M. Hofmann, N. An- ders, P. Roth, P. Daum, J. Kruse, S. Jacob, S. Gurevich, N. Wong, M. S. Sch¨ offler, L. P. H. Schmidt, T. Jahnke, M. Kunitski, R. D¨ orner, and S. Eckart, Chiral electron momentum distribution upon strong-field ionization of a...

    2025

  27. [33]

    K¨ ohnke, K

    D. K¨ ohnke, K. Eickhoff, T. Bayer, and M. Wollenhaupt, Multichromatic supercontinuum polarization shaping ap- plied to photoelectron holography, New J. Phys.25, 123025 (2023)

    2023

  28. [34]

    A. T. J. B. Eppink and D. H. Parker, Velocity map imag- ing of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses: Appli- cation in photoelectron and photofragment ion imaging of molecular oxygen, Rev. Sci. Instrum.68, 3477 (1997)

    1997

  29. [35]

    Y. Chen, D. Haase, J. Manz, H. Wang, and Y. Yang, From chiral laser pulses to femto- and attosecond elec- tronic chirality flips in achiral molecules, Nat. Commun. 15, 565 (2024)

    2024

  30. [36]

    Davino, E

    M. Davino, E. McManus, P.-H. Tran, V.-H. Hoang, A. F. Ord´ o˜ nez, G. Gibson, T. Saule, A.-T. Le, and C. A. Trallero-Herrero, Symmetries in three-dimensional photoelectron momentum spectroscopy as precursory methods for dichroic and enantiosensitive measurements, Phys. Rev. Ap...

    2025

  31. [38]

    Kerbstadt, K

    S. Kerbstadt, K. Eickhoff, T. Bayer, and M. Wollen- haupt, Odd electron wave packets from cycloidal ultra- short laser fields, Nat. Comm.10, 658 (2019)

    2019

  32. [39]

    Davino, E

    M. Davino, E. McManus, N. G. Helming, C. Cheng, G. Moˇ gol, Z. Rodnova, G. Harrison, K. Watson, T. Weinacht, G. N. Gibson, T. Saule, and C. A. Trallero- Herrero, A plano-convex thick-lens velocity map imag- ing apparatus for direct, high resolution 3d momentum measurements of ...

    2023

  33. [40]

    Zamith, M

    S. Zamith, M. A. Bouchene, E. Sokell, C. Nicole, V. Blanchet, and B. Girard, Observation of the oscilla- tion of an angular wavepacket, Eur. Phys. J. D12, 255 (2000)

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.