pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.01515 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-01 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Rci-Q: an improved QED correction model for the GRASP2018 package

Karol Kozio{\l} This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords QED correctionsradiative potentialself-energyvacuum polarizationatomic energy levelsfinite nucleusmany-electron atoms
0
0 comments X

The pith

An extension to the GRASP2018 package adds new prefactors and terms to improve quantum electrodynamics corrections for atomic energy levels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the Rci-Q package as an update to the GRASP2018 suite for estimating QED corrections to energy levels in many-electron atoms. It builds on the Flambaum-Ginges radiative potential to approximate the leading self-energy correction. New fitting prefactors are provided to parameterize this potential more effectively. The model incorporates a correction to the self-energy that accounts for the finite size of the nucleus. It also implements the Wichmann-Kroll contribution to the vacuum polarization potential. These changes target greater accuracy in theoretical atomic spectra.

Core claim

The paper establishes that new fitting prefactors for the radiative potential, combined with finite-nucleus self-energy corrections and the Wichmann-Kroll vacuum polarization term, form an improved model for QED effects within the Rci-Q extension of GRASP2018.

What carries the argument

The Flambaum-Ginges radiative potential, now parameterized with new fitting prefactors and extended by finite-nucleus self-energy and Wichmann-Kroll vacuum polarization terms to approximate leading QED corrections.

Load-bearing premise

The updated radiative potential with new prefactors stays accurate for many-electron atoms after the finite-nucleus and Wichmann-Kroll additions are included.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of predicted versus measured transition energies in a heavy element such as uranium or lead where QED shifts are large and precisely known would show whether the updated corrections reduce or increase discrepancies.

read the original abstract

The Rci-Q package is an extension to the GRASP2018 suite, improving the model of estimating the quantum-electrodynamics corrections to the energy levels. The Flambaum-Ginges radiative potential method is used to estimate the leading self-energy correction to electron energy in many electron atoms. The new fitting prefactors to parameterize radiative potential are presented. The correction to self-energy originating from finite nucleus size is included. The Wichmann-Kroll part of the vacuum polarization potential is also implemented.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Rci-Q package as an extension to GRASP2018 for improved modeling of QED corrections to energy levels in many-electron atoms. It updates the Flambaum-Ginges radiative potential using newly determined fitting prefactors, incorporates the self-energy correction due to finite nuclear size, and implements the Wichmann-Kroll contribution to the vacuum polarization potential.

Significance. If validated with quantitative benchmarks, the work would provide a more complete QED framework for relativistic atomic calculations, addressing omissions in prior implementations of the radiative potential and vacuum polarization. The explicit inclusion of finite-nucleus self-energy and Wichmann-Kroll terms adds physical content that could reduce systematic errors in high-precision spectroscopy applications.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The central claim that the new fitting prefactors yield an 'improved' QED model is not accompanied by any numerical validation, such as comparisons of transition energies or level shifts before and after the updates against experiment or independent high-precision QED calculations. This omission is load-bearing because the prefactors are explicitly fitted quantities, and without before/after error metrics it is impossible to distinguish genuine improvement from parameter adjustment.
  2. Abstract and implementation description: The fitting procedure for the new prefactors is not described, including the specific atoms or states used, the target data set, or the optimization method. This information is required to assess whether the prefactors remain accurate for systems outside the fitting set and to evaluate the risk that the model reduces to an ad-hoc parameterization rather than a first-principles advance.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would be strengthened by a brief statement of the magnitude of the corrections or the atoms used for fitting, even if full tables appear later in the manuscript.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional validation and details on the fitting procedure.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The central claim that the new fitting prefactors yield an 'improved' QED model is not accompanied by any numerical validation, such as comparisons of transition energies or level shifts before and after the updates against experiment or independent high-precision QED calculations. This omission is load-bearing because the prefactors are explicitly fitted quantities, and without before/after error metrics it is impossible to distinguish genuine improvement from parameter adjustment.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative benchmarks are required to substantiate the improvement from the updated prefactors. The revised manuscript will include direct comparisons of energy levels and transition energies computed with the original and new prefactors, benchmarked against experimental data and independent high-precision QED results for representative atomic systems. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Abstract and implementation description: The fitting procedure for the new prefactors is not described, including the specific atoms or states used, the target data set, or the optimization method. This information is required to assess whether the prefactors remain accurate for systems outside the fitting set and to evaluate the risk that the model reduces to an ad-hoc parameterization rather than a first-principles advance.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a full description of the fitting procedure is essential for reproducibility and to evaluate transferability. The revised manuscript will include an expanded section specifying the atoms and states used in the fit, the reference dataset, and the optimization method. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model improvements are explicit additions and parameterizations

full rationale

The paper presents Rci-Q as a software extension to GRASP2018 that adopts the Flambaum-Ginges radiative potential with newly fitted prefactors, adds a finite-nucleus correction to the self-energy, and implements the Wichmann-Kroll vacuum polarization term. These elements are described as direct inclusions and parameter adjustments rather than any claimed first-principles derivation whose output reduces to the inputs by construction. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or self-citation chains are invoked in the provided text that would force the central claims to be equivalent to the fitting data or prior results. The improvements can be assessed against external benchmarks or experiments independently of the fitting procedure itself, making the work self-contained for its stated purpose of model extension.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on the validity of the Flambaum-Ginges approximation for self-energy, standard QED perturbative ordering, and the assumption that fitted prefactors transfer across atomic systems.

free parameters (1)
  • new fitting prefactors for radiative potential
    Explicitly stated as newly presented parameters used to scale the Flambaum-Ginges potential.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Flambaum-Ginges radiative potential approximates the leading self-energy correction in many-electron atoms
    Central method invoked in the abstract for estimating QED corrections.
  • domain assumption Finite-nucleus size correction to self-energy can be added independently to the radiative potential
    Included without further justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5370 in / 1308 out tokens · 105186 ms · 2026-05-17T03:28:19.176233+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C.FroeseFischer,G.Gaigalas,P.Jönsson,J.Bieroń,GRASP2018—AFortran95versionoftheGeneralRelativisticAtomic StructurePackage,ComputerPhysicsCommunications237(2019)184–187.doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.10.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.10.032 2019

  2. [2]

    Kozioł, G

    K. Kozioł, G. A. Aucar, QED effects on individual atomic orbital energies, The Journal of Chemical Physics 148 (13) (2018)134101.doi:10.1063/1.5026193

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5026193 2018

  3. [3]

    J.A.Lowe,C.T.Chantler,I.P.Grant,Self-energyscreeningapproximationsinmulti-electronatoms,RadiationPhysics andChemistry85(2013)118–123.doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.01.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.01.004 2013

  4. [4]

    Masset, R

    T. Nguyen, J. Lowe, T. Pham, I. Grant, C. Chantler, Electron self-energy corrections using the Welton concept for atomicstructurecalculations,RadiationPhysicsandChemistry204(November2022)(2023)110644. doi:10.1016/j. radphyschem.2022.110644

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2023

  5. [5]

    V.Shabaev,I.Tupitsyn,V.Yerokhin,QEDMOD:FortranprogramforcalculatingthemodelLamb-shiftoperator,Computer PhysicsCommunications189(2015)175–181.doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.12.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.12.002 2015

  6. [7]

    QED radiative corrections and many-body effects in atoms: vacuum polarization and binding energy shifts in alkali metals

    J.S.M.Ginges,J.C.Berengut,QEDradiativecorrectionsandmany-bodyeffectsinatoms: Vacuumpolarizationand bindingenergyshiftsinalkalimetals,JournalofPhysicsB:Atomic,MolecularandOpticalPhysics49(9)(2016)095001. arXiv:1511.01459,doi:10.1088/0953-4075/49/9/095001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0953-4075/49/9/095001 2016

  7. [8]

    E.Kahl,J.C.Berengut,Ambit: Aprogrammeforhigh-precisionrelativisticatomicstructurecalculations,Computer PhysicsCommunications238(2019)232–243.doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.12.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.12.014 2019

  8. [9]

    T.Saue,L.Visscher,H.J.Aa.Jensen,R.Bast,A.S.P.Gomes,I.A.Aucar,V.Bakken,J.Brandejs,C.Chibueze,J.Creutzberg, K.G.Dyall,S.Dubillard,U.Ekström,E.Eliav,T.Enevoldsen,E.Faßhauer,T.Fleig,O.Fossgaard,K.J.Gaul,L.Halbert,E.D. Hedegård,T.Helgaker,B.Helmich-Paris,J.Henriksson,M.vanHorn,M.Iliaš,Ch.R.Jacob,S.Knecht,S.Komorovský, O.Kullie,J.K.Lærdahl,C.V.Larsen,Y.S.Lee,N....

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.14833106 2025

  9. [10]

    Thierfelder, P

    C. Thierfelder, P. Schwerdtfeger, Quantum electrodynamic corrections for the valence shell in heavy many-electron atoms,PhysicalReviewA82(6)(2010)062503.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.062503

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.82.062503 2010

  10. [11]

    thesis,MasseyUniversity,Albany,NewZealand(2022).arXiv:10179/17634

    M.Piibeleht,NumericalinvestigationsoftheDiracequationandboundstatequantumelectrodynamicsinatoms,Ph.D. thesis,MasseyUniversity,Albany,NewZealand(2022).arXiv:10179/17634

    work page 2022

  11. [12]

    Janke, A

    K. Janke, A. E. Wedenig, P. Schwerdtfeger, K. Gaul, R. Berger, Quantum electrodynamic corrections for molecules: Vacuum polarization and electron self-energy in a two-component relativistic framework, The Journal of Chemical Physics162(10)(2025)104111.arXiv:2411.08213,doi:10.1063/5.0252409

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0252409 2025

  12. [13]

    P.J.Mohr,Self-energycorrectiontoone-electronenergylevelsinastrongCoulombfield,PhysicalReviewA46(7)(1992) 4421–4424.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.46.4421

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.46.4421 1992

  13. [14]

    V.A.Yerokhin,Z.Harman,C.H.Keitel,One-loopelectronself-energywithacceleratedpartial-waveexpansioninthe Coulombgauge,PhysicalReviewA111(1)(2025)012802.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.111.012802

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.111.012802 2025

  14. [15]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.45.2727

    P.J.Mohr,Y.-K.Kim,Self-energyofexcitedstatesinastrongCoulombfield,PhysicalReviewA45(5)(1992)2727–2735. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.45.2727

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.45.2727 1992

  15. [16]

    É.-O.LeBigot,P.Indelicato,P.J.Mohr,QEDself-energycontributiontohighlyexcitedatomicstates,PhysicalReviewA 64(5)(2001)052508.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.64.052508

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052508 2001

  16. [17]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.012507

    V.A.Yerokhin,Nuclear-sizecorrectiontotheLambshiftofone-electronatoms,PhysicalReviewA83(1)(2011)012507. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.012507

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.83.012507 2011

  17. [18]

    V. M. Shabaev, I. I. Tupitsyn, V. A. Yerokhin, Model operator approach to the Lamb shift calculations in relativistic many-electronatoms,PhysicalReviewA88(1)(2013)012513. arXiv:1305.6333, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.012513

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.88.012513 2013

  18. [19]

    doi:10.1088/0953-4075/24/3/012

    A.G.Fainshtein,N.L.Manakov,A.A.Nekipelov,VacuumpolarizationbyaCoulombfield.Analyticalapproximation of the polarization potential, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 24 (3) (1991) 559–569. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/24/3/012

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/24/3/012 1991

  19. [20]

    A.N.Artemyev,V.M.Shabaev,V.A.Yerokhin,G.Plunien,G.Soff,QEDcalculationofthen=1andn=2energylevelsin He-likeions,PhysicalReviewA71(6)(2005)062104.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062104

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.71.062104 2005

  20. [21]

    D.R.Plante,W.R.Johnson,J.Sapirstein,Relativisticall-ordermany-bodycalculationsofthen=1andn=2statesof heliumlikeions,PhysicalReviewA49(5)(1994)3519–3530.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.49.3519

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.49.3519 1994

  21. [22]

    E. V. Aglitskii, E. P. Ivanova, S. A. Panin, U. I. Safronova, S. I. Ulityn, L. A. Vainshtein, J.-F. Wyart, Investigation of 11 thespectraofdipole2-3transitionsinNe-likeions(Z=36-92),PhysicaScripta40(5)(1989)601–609. doi:10.1088/ 0031-8949/40/5/006

    work page 1989

  22. [23]

    Beiersdorfer, M

    P. Beiersdorfer, M. Bitter, S. Von Goeler, K. W. Hill, Experimental study of the x-ray transitions in the heliumlike isoelectronicsequence,PhysicalReviewA40(1)(1989)150–157.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.40.150

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.40.150 1989

  23. [24]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.032508

    K.Kubiček,P.H.Mokler,V.Mäckel,J.Ullrich,J.R.C.López-Urrutia,Transitionenergymeasurementsinhydrogenlike andheliumlikeionsstronglysupportingbound-stateQEDcalculations,PhysicalReviewA90(3)(2014)032508. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.032508

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.032508 2014

  24. [25]

    J. P. Briand, M. Tavernier, R. Marrus, J.-P. Desclaux, High-precision spectroscopic study of heliumlike iron, Physical ReviewA29(6)(1984)3143–3149.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.29.3143

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.29.3143 1984

  25. [26]

    J.K.Rudolph,S.Bernitt,S.W.Epp,R.Steinbrügge,C.Beilmann,G.V.Brown,S.Eberle,A.Graf,Z.Harman,N.Hell, M.Leutenegger, A.Müller, K.Schlage, H.-C.Wille, H.Yavaş, J.Ullrich, J.R.CrespoLópez-Urrutia, X-RayResonant Photoexcitation: LinewidthsandEnergiesofK 𝛼TransitionsinHighlyChargedFeIons,PhysicalReviewLetters111(10) (2013)103002.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.103002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.103002 2013

  26. [27]

    Indelicato, J

    P. Indelicato, J. P. Briand, M. Tavernier, D. Liesen, Experimental study of relativistic correlations and QED effects in heliumlikeKryptonions,ZeitschriftfürPhysikDAtoms,MoleculesandClusters2(3)(1986)249–250. doi:10.1007/ BF01429081

    work page 1986

  27. [28]

    K.Widmann,P.Beiersdorfer,V.Decaux,M.L.Bitter,MeasurementsoftheK 𝛼transitionenergiesofheliumlikekrypton, PhysicalReviewA53(4)(1996)2200–2205.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2200

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2200 1996

  28. [29]

    S. W. Epp, R. Steinbrügge, S. Bernitt, J. K. Rudolph, C. Beilmann, H. Bekker, A. Müller, O. O. Versolato, H.-C. Wille, H.Yavaş,J.Ullrich,J.R.CrespoLópez-Urrutia,Single-photonexcitationofK 𝛼inheliumlikeKr34+: Resultssupporting quantumelectrodynamicspredictions,PhysicalReviewA92(2)(2015)020502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.92.020502

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.020502 2015

  29. [30]

    doi: 10.1007/BF02117207

    J.P.Briand,P.Indelicato,M.Tavernier,O.Gorceix,D.Liesen,H.F.Beyer,B.Liu,A.Warczak,J.-P.Desclaux,Observation ofhydrogenlikeandheliumlikekryptonspectra,ZeitschriftfürPhysikA:AtomsandNuclei318(1)(1984)1–5. doi: 10.1007/BF02117207

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02117207 1984

  30. [31]

    J.P.Briand,P.Indelicato,A.Simionovici,V.SanVicente,D.Liesen,D.Dietrich,SpectroscopicStudyofHydrogenlike andHeliumlikeXenonIons,EurophysicsLetters(EPL)9(3)(1989)225.doi:10.1209/0295-5075/9/3/007

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/9/3/007 1989

  31. [32]

    D.B.Thorn,M.F.Gu,G.V.Brown,P.Beiersdorfer,F.S.Porter,C.A.Kilbourne,R.L.Kelley,PrecisionMeasurement oftheK-ShellSpectrumfromHighlyChargedXenonwithanArrayofX-RayCalorimeters,PhysicalReviewLetters 103(16)(2009)163001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.163001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.163001 2009

  32. [33]

    Physical Review Letters 85(10), 2200–2203 (2000)

    J.P.Briand,P.Chevallier,P.Indelicato,K.P.Ziock,D.D.Dietrich,Observationandmeasurementofn=2 →n=1transitions ofhydrogenlikeandheliumlikeuranium,PhysicalReviewLetters65(22)(1990)2761–2764. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 65.2761

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 1990

  33. [34]

    J. H. Lupton, D. D. Dietrich, C. J. Hailey, R. E. Stewart, K. P. Ziock, Measurements of the ground-state Lamb shift andelectron-correlationeffectsinhydrogenlikeandheliumlikeuranium,PhysicalReviewA50(3)(1994)2150–2154. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.50.2150

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.50.2150 1994

  34. [35]

    P.Indelicato,QEDtestswithhighlychargedions,JournalofPhysicsB:Atomic,MolecularandOpticalPhysics52(23) (2019)232001.arXiv:1909.06274,doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ab42c9

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ab42c9 2019

  35. [36]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.98.020502

    M.C.Li,R.Si,T.Brage,R.Hutton,Y.M.Zou,ProposalofhighlyaccuratetestsofBreitandQEDeffectsinthegroundstate 2p5oftheF-likeisoelectronicsequence,PhysicalReviewA98(2)(2018)020502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.98.020502

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.020502 2018

  36. [37]

    Physical Review A33(5), 2913–2927 (1986)

    A.V.Volotka,M.Bilal,R.Beerwerth,X.Ma,Th.Stöhlker,S.Fritzsche,QEDradiativecorrectionstothe2P1/2-2P3/2fine structureinfluorinelikeions,PhysicalReviewA100(1)(2019)010502. arXiv:1907.07913, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA. 100.010502

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva 2019

  37. [38]

    V.M.Shabaev,I.I.Tupitsyn,M.Y.Kaygorodov,Y.S.Kozhedub,A.V.Malyshev,D.V.Mironova,QEDcorrectionstothe 2P1/2-2P3/2finestructureinfluorinelikeions: ModelLamb-shift-operatorapproach,PhysicalReviewA101(5)(2020) 052502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.101.052502

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.101.052502 2020

  38. [39]

    Jönsson, G

    P. Jönsson, G. Gaigalas, C. F. Fischer, J. Bieroń, I. P. Grant, T. Brage, J. Ekman, M. Godefroid, J. Grumer, J. Li, W. Li, GRASPManualforUsers,Atoms11(4)(2023)68.doi:10.3390/atoms11040068. 12

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms11040068 2023