Unsupervised and Supervised Algorithms for Identification of Sample Pixels in FTIR Images
Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:18 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Three unsupervised and supervised algorithms accurately identify sample pixels versus background in FTIR images of biological tissues.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The authors present three algorithms using unsupervised and supervised approaches that accurately predict sample and background pixels in FTIR images, with the supervised method enabling automatic detection for improved FTIR signal processing.
What carries the argument
Unsupervised and supervised classification algorithms that separate pixels based on their spectral signatures in FTIR images.
If this is right
- Accurate pixel identification enables more effective feature extraction from FTIR images.
- The supervised approach allows for automatic detection without manual intervention.
- These methods provide robust solutions for sample pixel detection in FTIR imaging.
- Improved pre-processing contributes to better analysis of morphological and pathological alterations in biological tissues.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Similar algorithms might apply to other label-free spectroscopic imaging methods beyond FTIR.
- Automation could facilitate larger-scale studies of tissue samples in pathology research.
- Integration with real-time scanning devices could support on-the-fly analysis during experiments.
Load-bearing premise
FTIR images have sufficiently distinct spectral signatures between sample and background pixels that allow reliable separation by the algorithms without extra tuning.
What would settle it
Application of the algorithms to FTIR images where sample and background pixels have overlapping or similar spectral features, measuring if prediction accuracy significantly decreases.
Figures
read the original abstract
Mid-InfraRed spectroscopy is a promising label-free technique that can offer insights into morphological and pathological alterations in biological tissues at the molecular level. Owing to the development of the Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) spectrometer, combined with scanning devices, FTIR images can be produced by simultaneously acquiring spectral data from multiple spatial points, generating comprehensive chemical maps. In the data pre-processing, the identification of the sample pixels, with the background pixels excluded, is important for further effective feature extraction in FTIR images. Here, we present three algorithms realized in unsupervised and supervised approaches for the identification of the sample pixels. The algorithms demonstrate accurate prediction results of the sample and background pixels, and the supervised method further enables the automatic detection. These findings highlight thorough and robust solutions to the sample pixels detection problem in FTIR images, contributing to the FTIR signal processing and future research with FTIR images.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript presents three algorithms realized in unsupervised and supervised approaches for identifying sample pixels versus background pixels in FTIR images of biological tissues. The central claim is that these algorithms achieve accurate prediction of sample and background pixels, with the supervised method additionally enabling automatic detection, thereby providing robust solutions for pre-processing FTIR data to support feature extraction.
Significance. If the performance claims hold under quantitative scrutiny, the work addresses a practical bottleneck in FTIR hyperspectral imaging for label-free biomedical analysis. Unsupervised methods could be especially useful where labeled training data are limited, while the supervised component offers automation potential. This could improve reproducibility in chemical mapping workflows, though the absence of metrics limits assessment of real-world impact.
major comments (1)
- [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that 'the algorithms demonstrate accurate prediction results' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, error analysis, validation procedures, or baseline comparisons (e.g., against standard clustering or classification methods). This is load-bearing for the central empirical claim and prevents evaluation of whether the methods reliably separate pixels based on distinct spectral signatures.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and constructive comments, which highlight important areas for strengthening the empirical support in our work. We address the major comment point by point below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that 'the algorithms demonstrate accurate prediction results' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, error analysis, validation procedures, or baseline comparisons (e.g., against standard clustering or classification methods). This is load-bearing for the central empirical claim and prevents evaluation of whether the methods reliably separate pixels based on distinct spectral signatures.
Authors: We agree that the abstract claim would be more robust with explicit quantitative support. The manuscript presents visual results and qualitative demonstrations of pixel identification in FTIR images of biological tissues, showing clear separation based on spectral features for both unsupervised and supervised variants. However, to directly address this concern and enable proper evaluation, we will revise the abstract to reference specific performance metrics from our experiments. We will also add a dedicated quantitative evaluation subsection in the results, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores, along with error analysis, cross-validation details, and direct comparisons to baselines such as k-means clustering (unsupervised) and support vector machines (supervised). These additions will substantiate the reliability of the spectral-signature-based separation. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity detected
full rationale
The paper presents three algorithms (unsupervised and supervised) for identifying sample versus background pixels in FTIR images and reports that they achieve accurate empirical results on the task. No derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are described that reduce a claimed prediction or result to the input data by construction. The central claim rests on the observed performance of the algorithms rather than any self-referential definition or load-bearing self-citation, making the work self-contained against external benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption FTIR images exhibit distinguishable spectral features between sample tissue and background regions
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Benex K Babu, Murali Manohar Yadav, Shantanu Singh, and Vijay Kumar Yadav. Fuel forensics: recent advance- ments in profiling of adulterated fuels by atr-ftir spectroscopy and chemometric approaches.Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 312:124049, 2024
work page 2024
-
[2]
Bo Deng, Lingfen Rao, and Lucia Rodriguez-Freire. Evaluation and optimization of ftir spectroscopy to quantify pha production by municipal wastewater sludge.Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 312:124012, 2024
work page 2024
-
[3]
Jiang Zhu, Wei Wei, Bo Chen, Ping Tang, Xiangyu Zhao, and Chongzhao Wu. Surface-enhanced infrared absorption sensor incorporating liquid galinstan with three-dimensional metagratings.Acs Photonics, 11(5):1857– 1865, 2024
work page 2024
-
[4]
Michael Pilling and Peter Gardner. Fundamental developments in infrared spectroscopic imaging for biomedical applications.Chemical Society reviews, 45(7):1935–1957, 2016
work page 1935
-
[5]
Warda Boutegrabet, Dominique Guenot, Olivier Bouché, Camille Boulagnon-Rombi, Aude Marchal Bressenot, Olivier Piot, and Cyril Gobinet. Automatic identification of paraffin pixels on ftir images acquired on ffpe human samples.Analytical Chemistry, 93(8):3750–3761, 2021
work page 2021
-
[6]
Norbert Bergner, Bernd FM Romeike, Rupert Reichart, Rolf Kalff, Christoph Krafft, and Jürgen Popp. Tumor margin identification and prediction of the primary tumor from brain metastases using ftir imaging and support vector machines.Analyst, 138(14):3983–3990, 2013
work page 2013
-
[7]
Characterization of human breast cancer tissues by infrared imaging.Analyst, 141(2):606–619, 2016
Magali Verdonck, Amandine Denayer, Benjamin Delvaux, Soizic Garaud, Roland De Wind, Christine Desmedt, Christos Sotiriou, Karen Willard-Gallo, and Erik Goormaghtigh. Characterization of human breast cancer tissues by infrared imaging.Analyst, 141(2):606–619, 2016
work page 2016
-
[8]
Mohamed HM Ali, Salman M Toor, Fazle Rakib, Raghvendra Mall, Ehsan Ullah, Kamal Mroue, Prasanna R Kolatkar, Khalid Al-Saad, and Eyad Elkord. Investigation of the effect of pd-l1 blockade on triple negative breast cancer cells using fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.V accines, 7(3):109, 2019
work page 2019
-
[9]
Mohamed H Ali, Fazle Rakib, Khalid Al-Saad, Rafif Al-Saady, Fiona M Lyng, and Erik Goormaghtigh. A simple model for cell type recognition using 2d-correlation analysis of ftir images from breast cancer tissue.Journal of Molecular Structure, 1163:472–479, 2018. 10 APREPRINT
work page 2018
-
[10]
Jayakrupakar Nallala, Charles Jeynes, Sarah Saunders, Neil Smart, Gavin Lloyd, Leah Riley, Debbie Salmon, and Nick Stone. Characterization of colorectal mucus using infrared spectroscopy: a potential target for bowel cancer screening and diagnosis.Laboratory Investigation, 100(8):1102–1110, 2020
work page 2020
-
[11]
Cai Li Song and Sergei G Kazarian. Micro atr-ftir spectroscopic imaging of colon biopsies with a large area ge crystal.Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 228:117695, 2020
work page 2020
-
[12]
Jingzhu Shao, Xiangyu Zhao, Ping Tang, Bo Chen, Borui Xu, Han Lu, Zhen Qin, and Chongzhao Wu. Label-free investigation of infected acute pyelonephritis tissue by ftir microspectroscopy with unsupervised and supervised analytical methods.Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 321:124753, 2024
work page 2024
-
[13]
Vishal K Varma, Andre Kajdacsy-Balla, Sanjeev K Akkina, Suman Setty, and Michael J Walsh. A label-free approach by infrared spectroscopic imaging for interrogating the biochemistry of diabetic nephropathy progression. Kidney international, 89(5):1153–1159, 2016
work page 2016
-
[14]
Sumedha Liyanage and Noureddine Abidi. Fourier transform infrared applications to investigate induced bio- chemical changes in liver.Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, 55(9-10):840–872, 2020
work page 2020
-
[15]
Xien Yang, Quanhong Ou, Kai Qian, Jianru Yang, Zhixun Bai, Weiye Yang, Youming Shi, and Gang Liu. Diagnosis of lung cancer by atr-ftir spectroscopy and chemometrics.Frontiers in Oncology, 11:753791, 2021
work page 2021
-
[16]
Huanyu Li, Jun Wang, Xiaoyun Li, Xianhong Zhu, Shaomei Guo, Hongluan Wang, Jie Yu, Xiaoqun Ye, and Fan He. Comparison of serum from lung cancer patients and from patients with benign lung nodule using ftir spectroscopy.Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 306:123596, 2024
work page 2024
-
[17]
Richard Lindtner, Alexander Wurm, Katrin Kugel, Julia Kühn, David Putzer, Rohit Arora, Débora Cristina Coraça-Huber, Philipp Zelger, Michael Schirmer, Jovan Badzoka, et al. Comparison of mid-infrared handheld and benchtop spectrometers to detect staphylococcus epidermidis in bone grafts.Bioengineering, 10(9):1018, 2023
work page 2023
-
[18]
Lei Li, Xiaoning Bi, Hengzi Sun, Simiao Liu, Mei Yu, Ying Zhang, Shifu Weng, Limin Yang, Yanan Bao, Jinguang Wu, et al. Characterization of ovarian cancer cells and tissues by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.Journal of ovarian research, 11(1):64, 2018
work page 2018
-
[19]
Xu Zhang, Fan Yu, Jie Li, Dongliang Song, Heping Li, Kaige Wang, Qingli He, and Shuang Wang. Investigation on the cancer invasion and metastasis of skin squamous cell carcinoma by raman spectroscopy.Molecules, 24(11):2059, 2019
work page 2059
-
[20]
João Paulo da Silva Queiroz, Breno Pupin, Tanmoy Tapobrata Bhattacharjee, Miyuki Uno, Roger Chammas, Marco Aurelio Vamondes Kulcsar, and Renata de Azevedo Canevari. Expression data of fos and jun genes and ftir spectra provide diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma.Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 304:123305, 2024
work page 2024
-
[21]
Elodie Ly, Olivier Piot, Rolf Wolthuis, Anne Durlach, Philipe Bernard, and Michel Manfait. Combination of ftir spectral imaging and chemometrics for tumour detection from paraffin-embedded biopsies.Analyst, 133(2):197–205, 2008
work page 2008
-
[22]
Nils Kristian Afseth and Achim Kohler. Extended multiplicative signal correction in vibrational spectroscopy, a tutorial.Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 117:92–99, 2012. 11
work page 2012
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.