Mixing at the Batchelor Scale for White-In-Time Flows

Dennis Chemnitz; Robin Chemnitz

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 30 references

Mixing at the Batchelor Scale for White-In-Time Flows

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A four-mode white-in-time shear flow verifies the Batchelor scale conjecture.

desk verdict A clean Itô-calculus lower bound for a white-in-time four-mode model, genuinely new; the Batchelor-scale verification hinges on an external theorem from GY25 whose hypotheses are asserted but not checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.04297 v2 pith:IOQJZZ4F submitted 2025-12-03 math.PR math.APmath.DS

Robin Chemnitz , Dennis Chemnitz This is my paper

classification math.PRmath.APmath.DS MSC 60H1535Q3537H15

keywords Batchelorscalewhite-in-timeflowspassivescalarmixingenhanceddissipationFouriermodesstochasticadvection-diffusionrateshearflow

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that for a passive scalar advected on the two-dimensional torus by a white-in-time velocity field built from four shear modes, the mass in the four lowest Fourier modes can leave those modes at most exponentially fast, uniformly as the diffusivity vanishes. Specifically, the limsup decay rate is bounded below by -(2π)²(1/2+κ). Combined with an existing uniform upper bound, this shows the exponential dissipation rate stays of order one, so tracer filaments shrink like the square root of the diffusivity — exactly the Batchelor scale. The same argument works on the three-dimensional torus with twelve shear modes, and without diffusion it pins the exponential mixing rate γ_s up to a constant: γ_s ≍ 1∧s. The authors present this as the first passive scalar model for which the Batchelor scale conjecture can be verified.

What carries the argument

The engine is the Fourier representation of the SPDE. Writing the real and imaginary parts of the four innermost modes as a vector X(t), the deterministic part is dX = −γX dt plus a noise term πA(t)dW, with γ=(2π)²(1/2+κ) and a matrix A(t) assembled from neighboring Fourier modes. Applying the change-of-variables formula of stochastic calculus to λ_t = log‖X(t)‖ yields a drift term that is nonnegative because A has block form with two orthogonally equivalent blocks: the sum of squares of the entries of A is at least twice the square of its operator norm. The log norm therefore cannot drift downward faster than −γt, and the martingale part, time-changed to a Brownian motion, cannot decay at a

What would settle it

Run the four-mode SPDE numerically for very small κ (including κ=0) with a fixed nonzero initial condition and compute limsup_{t→∞} (1/t) log‖Π_{≤1}f_t‖. If any realization produced a value strictly below −(2π)²(1/2+κ), the theorem would be false. Separately, checking whether the four shear fields satisfy the conditions of the cited uniform upper-bound theorem would settle whether the Batchelor-scale verification is complete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the SPDE df_t = κΔf_t dt − Σ σ_i·∇f_t ∘ dW^i_t with shear fields σ₁=(sin2πy,0), σ₂=(cos2πy,0), σ₃=(0,sin2πx), σ₄=(0,cos2πx), the projection onto the four innermost Fourier modes satisfies limsup_{t→∞} (1/t) log‖Π_{≤1}f_t‖_{L²} ≥ −(2π)²(1/2+κ) almost surely for every nonzero initial condition. Because this lower bound is uniform as κ→0, it supplies the missing estimate on the exponential dissipation rate λ_κ. Together with a companion upper bound for the same model, it forces λ_κ to be of order one and the filamentation length ℓ(f_t) to scale like √κ, verifying the Batchelor scale conjecture. In the zero-diffusivity case the same lower bound yields a matching upper bound on the H^s→H^{-s}

Load-bearing premise

The Batchelor-scale conclusion requires that the four shear modes satisfy the hypotheses of a cited companion theorem that supplies the matching upper bound; the paper proves the lower bound but does not reprove that theorem, so if the shear modes fail those hypotheses the verification is incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every κ≥0, the exponential dissipation rate satisfies −(2π)²(1/2+κ) ≤ λ_κ < 0, so as κ→0 the rate stays bounded away from both zero and minus infinity; the Batchelor-scale filament length ℓ ∼ √κ follows.
For the pure transport equation with κ=0, the mixing rate γ_s is determined up to a constant: γ_s ≍ 1∧s, growing linearly for small s and saturating for large s.
The verification is not two-dimensional: the same lower bound, dissemination-rate bound, and mixing-rate equivalence hold on the three-dimensional torus with twelve shear modes.
The lower bound is valid for every nonzero mean-free initial condition, not just initial data already carrying mass in the lowest modes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The mechanism — low-mode mass cannot escape faster than a fixed exponential rate because the noise-coupling matrix has a universal block structure — suggests that any finite collection of shear modes with the same algebraic coupling will yield analogous uniform lower bounds; adding higher harmonics is a natural testable extension.
The paper treats the matching upper bound as a black box supplied by a companion theorem; re-deriving that bound directly for the four shear fields would make the Batchelor-scale verification fully self-contained.
The exact equivalence γ_s ≍ 1∧s may be a general signature of shear-dominated exponentially mixing flows; if so, measuring the large-s mixing rate gives a proxy for whether a turbulent model falls in the Batchelor regime.
Because the argument relies on the memoryless, white-in-time structure of the noise, extending the result to correlated-in-time or deterministic shear flows would require a new martingale technique; the present proof delineates the reach of the stochastic-calculus route.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

Know this paper for one thing: it proves a uniform-in-κ lower bound on the low-mode Fourier mass for the white-in-time four-mode shear model, and from that derives λ_κ ≥ −(2π)²(1/2+κ). That is a real result, not present in earlier literature. HPSRY24 had κ-dependent lower bounds for Navier–Stokes; this is a different mechanism, exploiting the degenerate structure of four shear modes. The core calculation is clean and checks out: the SDE for the low-mode projection has a diffusion matrix with two orthogonally equivalent blocks, so the log-norm drift is nonnegative; the DDS time-change argument rules out a negative linear drift for the martingale; Lemma 3.2 extends to all nonzero initial data via a connectedness argument on Fourier modes. The 3D extension is structurally identical.

Where I would press: the headline claim that this verifies the Batchelor scale for the model is a conjunction of the new lower bound with the upper bound limsup_{κ→0} λ_κ < 0 from [GY25, Theorem 6.2]. The authors assert in one sentence that their shear modes satisfy its hypotheses but do not reproduce them. If that assertion fails, the verification is incomplete—though Theorem 2.1 would still stand. Similarly, Corollary 2.3's small-s lower bound comes from GY25, not from this paper. The Fourier SDE (18) is stated without proof; the authors call it elementary, and it is, but it underpins everything, so a referee should ask for the derivation. I also noticed a sign inconsistency in (18)'s W² and W⁴ terms relative to (1), which looks fixable by redefining those Brownian motions; it does not affect the drift nonnegativity.

None of this undermines the internal mathematics as far as I can verify. The paper is honest that this is a toy model—white-in-time, fixed four modes—not the Navier–Stokes equation, and it does not overclaim generalization. It is a serious proof-of-concept.

Who should read it: anyone working on Batchelor-regime dissipation or mixing rates for passive scalars. It deserves a serious referee; the main request should be to supply the missing derivation and explicitly verify the GY25 hypotheses. I would take it as a conditional accept if those two boxes are ticked.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Stratonovich SPDE for passive scalar advection-diffusion on the two-dimensional torus driven by four white-in-time shear modes. Its main theorem, Theorem 2.1, gives an almost-sure lower bound on the limsup decay rate of the L² norm of the projection onto the four lowest nonzero Fourier modes: this rate is at least -(2π)²(1/2+κ), uniformly in κ≥0. From this the authors obtain, for every f0∈L²₀\{0}, a uniform-in-κ lower bound λ^κ ≥ -(2π)²(1/2+κ) on the dissipation rate. Combined with an upper bound imported from Gess and Yaroslavtsev [GY25], this is claimed to verify the Batchelor scale conjecture for this four-mode model. The paper also characterizes the zero-diffusion mixing rate, showing γ_s ∼ 1∧s, and extends the construction to a twelve-mode three-dimensional model.

Significance. If the external input is valid, this is a conceptually important result: it provides the first rigorous verification of Batchelor-type scaling for a white-in-time passive scalar model. The internal proof is clean and largely self-contained: Itô calculus reduces the problem to a four-dimensional linear SDE for the lowest modes, the drift is shown to be non-negative via a matrix inequality, and a Dambis–Dubins–Schwarz time change prevents the martingale term from decaying linearly. The constants are explicit and no parameters are fitted. The extension to three dimensions is plausible and adds to the paper's value. The main caveat is that the upper bound and part of the mixing-rate statement are not proved here but are imported from [GY25]; the manuscript must make the applicability of that external theorem fully checkable.

major comments (1)

[Sections 2 and 2.2] The paper's headline verification is a conjunction of Theorem 2.1 with [GY25, Theorem 6.2], which supplies the upper bound limsup_{κ→0} λ^κ<0, the exponential-mixing statement, and the small-s linear lower bound used in Corollary 2.3. The manuscript only asserts in one sentence that [GY25, Theorem 6.2] applies to the shear fields (2) and (17). The hypotheses of that theorem are not stated, and their verification is not given. If the four or twelve shear modes fail any condition of [GY25, Theorem 6.2] — for instance a nondegeneracy or regularity condition — then the Batchelor-scale verification reduces to a one-sided estimate and Corollaries 2.2 and 2.3 are not established. This is load-bearing and needs to be fixed: state the full hypotheses of the external theorem and check them explicitly for both models.

minor comments (4)

[Equation (18), Proposition 3.1] The dW¹ and dW³ terms in the Fourier SDE (18) have the opposite sign from those obtained directly from (1). This is harmless because W¹ and W³ can be replaced by their negatives, but the sign convention should be stated explicitly so that (18) is consistent with (1).
[Section 3.1, after (19)] The sentence 'The variable λ_t is non-positive' is not correct for unnormalized initial data; the projection norm can exceed 1. The subsequent argument only needs λ_t to be finite before τ∞, so this does not affect the proof, but the wording should be corrected, e.g. by assuming ∥f0∥_{L²}=1 without loss of generality.
[Section 3.3] In the three-dimensional proof, γ is defined as γ:=-(2π)²(1+κ), but the drift is written as -γX and the final lower bound is -γ=-(2π)²(1+κ). The sign is inconsistent; γ should be defined as (2π)²(1+κ). Also, the displayed limsup is written as log∥Π≤1 f0∥; it should be ∥Π≤1 f_t∥.
[Throughout] There are several typographical issues: 'Punchon-Smith' should be 'Punshon-Smith', 'Yaroslatsev' should be 'Yaroslavtsev', 'Tomasso' should be 'Tommaso', and at the end of Section 3.1 the projection is misprinted as Π≥1 instead of Π≤1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the lower bound is derived from the model SDE with no fitted parameters, and the upper bound is an independent external result.

full rationale

The claimed lower bound is not an input renamed as a prediction. Theorem 2.1 is proved from the explicit Fourier SDE (18) via Itô's formula on log||X||^2; the constant gamma = (2*pi)^2(1/2+kappa) is the computed drift of the low modes, and the nonnegativity of the Itô correction mu(t) is shown from the Frobenius/operator norm structure of A(t). No parameter is fitted to the dissipation rate or to the low-mode mass, and the proof does not presuppose the conjectured bound. Corollary 2.2 is a direct consequence of ||f_t|| >= ||Pi_{<=1} f_t||. The matching upper bound limsup_{kappa->0} lambda_kappa < 0 is imported from [GY25, Thm 6.2], an independent prior work by different authors; although the paper does not reproduce its hypotheses or verify them in detail for the four shear modes, this is an external-support dependency rather than circularity. Corollary 2.3 combines an internally proved lower bound with the external exponential-mixing result of [GY25]; the interpolation argument is standard and does not assume its conclusion. There are no load-bearing self-citations, no fitted quantity is called a prediction, and no self-authored uniqueness theorem is invoked. Any concern about the applicability of [GY25, Thm 6.2] is a correctness/verification caveat, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities. The model constants (2π)² and 1/2 arise from the shear normalization and the Stratonovich–Itô correction. The central lower-bound proof is self-contained apart from standard stochastic calculus; the paper's headline verification imports the matching upper bound from [GY25].

assumptions (5)

standard math Kunita's stochastic-flow theorem provides existence and regularity of solutions to the Lagrangian SDE (26) and the transport SPDE (25).
Appendix A constructs weak-in-space solutions ft=f0∘(φ^0,t)^{-1} and uses flow regularity.
standard math Multiplicative ergodic theorem (Oseledets–Ruelle) makes λκ a deterministic top Lyapunov exponent.
Section 1.1 defines λκ and uses it to talk about almost-sure dissipation rates.
domain assumption [GY25, Theorem 6.2] gives the upper bound limsup_{κ→0} λκ<0 for the 4-mode and 12-mode models, and γ_s≳s for small s.
This is the upper half of the Batchelor verification and the small-s lower bound in Corollary 2.3; not reproved in the paper.
standard math Baxendale's bound on sup |D_x φ^{-1}| with finite expectation (Bax89, Prop. 2.1) and Kingman's subadditive ergodic theorem define Λ and justify Proposition A.1.
Used to prove the upper bound γ_s≤sΛ.
standard math Dambis–Dubins–Schwarz theorem for continuous local martingales.
Used in §3.1 to conclude the martingale term M_t cannot decay at a linear rate.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mixing at the Batchelor Scale for White-In-Time Flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IOQJZZ4F

@misc{pith2026251204297,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mixing at the Batchelor Scale for White-In-Time Flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IOQJZZ4F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.04297}
}

read the original abstract

We consider the mixing properties of solutions to the advection-diffusion equation of a white-in-time velocity field on the 2-dimensional torus with four forced modes. As the diffusivity parameter goes to zero, we show that the almost-sure exponential dissipation rate stays bounded from below. Together with the corresponding upper bound established by Gess and Yaroslavtsev, this constitutes an example of a velocity field for which the Batchelor scale conjecture can be verified. In addition, we characterize the exponential mixing rate without diffusion of this system. Our results are not restricted to two dimensions, and we construct a three-dimensional white-in-time velocity field with the same properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.04297 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Fourier modes ˆfk,l(t) of the solution ft to (9). The inner modes with k 2 + l 2 = 1 are drawn as solid dots while all other modes are drawn as hollow dots. The arrows indicate which modes interact via the transport term; see Proposition 3.1. Proposition 3.1. The evolution of the Fourier coefficients fbk,l(t) ∈ C is given by dfbk,l(t) = −(2π) 2 1 2 + κ (k 2 + l 2 )fbk,l(t)dt + π k [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

[1]

Lectures on elliptic boundary value problems , volume 369

Shmuel Agmon. Lectures on elliptic boundary value problems , volume 369. American Mathematical Soc., 2010

2010
[2]

The role of chaotic orbits in the determination of power spectra of passive scalars

Thomas M Antonsen Jr, Zhencan Fan, Edward Ott, and E Garcia-Lopez. The role of chaotic orbits in the determination of power spectra of passive scalars. Physics of Fluids , 8(11):3094--3104, 1996

1996
[3]

Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid part 1

George K Batchelor. Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid part 1. general discussion and the case of small conductivity. Journal of fluid mechanics , 5(1):113--133, 1959

1959
[4]

Lyapunov exponents and relative entropy for a stochastic flow of diffeomorphisms

Peter H Baxendale. Lyapunov exponents and relative entropy for a stochastic flow of diffeomorphisms. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 81(4):521--554, 1989

1989
[5]

Almost-sure enhanced dissipation and uniform-in-diffusivity exponential mixing for advection--diffusion by stochastic N avier-- S tokes

Jacob Bedrossian, Alex Blumenthal, and Sam Punshon-Smith. Almost-sure enhanced dissipation and uniform-in-diffusivity exponential mixing for advection--diffusion by stochastic N avier-- S tokes. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 179(3):777--834, 2021

2021
[6]

L agrangian chaos and scalar advection in stochastic fluid mechanics

Jacob Bedrossian, Alex Blumenthal, and Sam Punshon-Smith. L agrangian chaos and scalar advection in stochastic fluid mechanics. Journal of the European Mathematical Society , 24(6):1893--1990, 2022

1990
[7]

Almost-sure exponential mixing of passive scalars by the stochastic N avier-- S tokes equations

Jacob Bedrossian, Alex Blumenthal, and Samuel Punshon-Smith. Almost-sure exponential mixing of passive scalars by the stochastic N avier-- S tokes equations. The Annals of Probability , 50(1):241--303, 2022

2022
[8]

The B atchelor spectrum of passive scalar turbulence in stochastic fluid mechanics at fixed R eynolds number

Jacob Bedrossian, Alex Blumenthal, and Samuel Punshon-Smith. The B atchelor spectrum of passive scalar turbulence in stochastic fluid mechanics at fixed R eynolds number. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 75(6):1237--1291, 2022

2022

Show all 30 references

[9]

Exponential mixing for random dynamical systems and an example of pierrehumbert

Alex Blumenthal, Michele Coti Zelati, and Rishabh S Gvalani. Exponential mixing for random dynamical systems and an example of pierrehumbert. The Annals of Probability , 51(4):1559--1601, 2023

2023
[10]

Large deviations and stochastic flows of diffeomorphisms

Peter H Baxendale and Daniel W Stroock. Large deviations and stochastic flows of diffeomorphisms. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 80(2):169--215, 1988

1988
[11]

Exponential scalar mixing for the 2d navier--stokes equations with degenerate stochastic forcing

William Cooperman and Keefer Rowan. Exponential scalar mixing for the 2d navier--stokes equations with degenerate stochastic forcing. Inventiones mathematicae , pages 1--97, 2025

2025
[12]

F ourier mass lower bounds for B atchelor-regime passive scalars

William Cooperman and Keefer Rowan. F ourier mass lower bounds for B atchelor-regime passive scalars. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05885 , 2025

2025 arXiv
[13]

Expanding on average diffeomorphisms of surfaces: exponential mixing

Jonathan DeWitt and Dmitry Dolgopyat. Expanding on average diffeomorphisms of surfaces: exponential mixing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08445 , 2024

2024 arXiv
[14]

Sample path properties of the stochastic flows

Dmitry Dolgopyat, Vadim Kaloshin, and Leonid Koralov. Sample path properties of the stochastic flows. The Annals of Probability , 32(1A):1--27, 2004

2004
[15]

Turbulence: the legacy of AN K olmogorov

Uriel Frisch and Andre Nikolaevich Kolmogorov. Turbulence: the legacy of AN K olmogorov . Cambridge university press, 1995

1995
[16]

Stabilization by transport noise and enhanced dissipation in the K raichnan model

Benjamin Gess and Ivan Yaroslavtsev. Stabilization by transport noise and enhanced dissipation in the K raichnan model. Journal of Evolution Equations , 25(2):42, 2025

2025
[17]

Lower bounds on the top L yapunov exponent for linear pdes driven by the 2d stochastic N avier- S tokes equations

Martin Hairer, Sam Punshon-Smith, Tommaso Rosati, and Jaeyun Yi. Lower bounds on the top L yapunov exponent for linear pdes driven by the 2d stochastic N avier- S tokes equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10419 , 2024

2024 arXiv
[18]

John F. C. Kingman. The ergodic theory of subadditive stochastic processes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) , 30(3):499--510, 1968

1968
[19]

The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large R eynolds numbers

Andrei Nikolaevich Kolmogorov. The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large R eynolds numbers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences , 434(1890):9--13, 1991

1991
[20]

Two different rapid decorrelation in time limits for turbulent diffusion

Peter R Kramer. Two different rapid decorrelation in time limits for turbulent diffusion. Journal of statistical physics , 110(1):87--136, 2003

2003
[21]

Stochastic differential equations and stochastic flows of diffeomorphisms

Hiroshi Kunita. Stochastic differential equations and stochastic flows of diffeomorphisms. In Ecole d' \'e t \'e de probabilit \'e s de Saint-Flour XII-1982 , pages 143--303. Springer, 2006

1982
[22]

Diffusion-limited mixing by incompressible flows

Christopher J Miles and Charles R Doering. Diffusion-limited mixing by incompressible flows. Nonlinearity , 31(5):2346, 2018

2018
[23]

A shell model for optimal mixing

Christopher J Miles and Charles R Doering. A shell model for optimal mixing. Journal of Nonlinear Science , 28(6):2153--2186, 2018

2018
[24]

Exponential mixing by random cellular flows

V \' ctor Navarro-Fern \'a ndez and Christian Seis. Exponential mixing by random cellular flows. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17273 , 2025

2025 arXiv
[25]

A multiplicative ergodic theorem, L yapunov characteristic numbers for dynamical systems

Valery Iustinovich Oseledec. A multiplicative ergodic theorem, L yapunov characteristic numbers for dynamical systems. Transactions of the Moscow Mathematical Society , 19:197--231, 1968

1968
[26]

On anomalous diffusion in the kraichnan model and correlated-in-time variants

Keefer Rowan. On anomalous diffusion in the kraichnan model and correlated-in-time variants. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 248(5):93, 2024

2024
[27]

Superexponential dissipation enhancement on T^d

Keefer Rowan. Superexponential dissipation enhancement on T^d . arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.02081 , 2025

2025 arXiv
[28]

Characteristic exponents and invariant manifolds in hilbert space

David Ruelle. Characteristic exponents and invariant manifolds in hilbert space. Annals of Mathematics , pages 243--290, 1982

1982
[29]

Continuous martingales and B rownian motion , volume 293 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]

Daniel Revuz and Marc Yor. Continuous martingales and B rownian motion , volume 293 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, third edition, 1999

1999
[30]

Statistically self-similar mixing by gaussian random fields

Michele Coti Zelati, Theodore D Drivas, and Rishabh S Gvalani. Statistically self-similar mixing by gaussian random fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15744 , 2023

2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Lectures on elliptic boundary value problems , volume 369

Shmuel Agmon. Lectures on elliptic boundary value problems , volume 369. American Mathematical Soc., 2010

2010

[2] [2]

The role of chaotic orbits in the determination of power spectra of passive scalars

Thomas M Antonsen Jr, Zhencan Fan, Edward Ott, and E Garcia-Lopez. The role of chaotic orbits in the determination of power spectra of passive scalars. Physics of Fluids , 8(11):3094--3104, 1996

1996

[3] [3]

Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid part 1

George K Batchelor. Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid part 1. general discussion and the case of small conductivity. Journal of fluid mechanics , 5(1):113--133, 1959

1959

[4] [4]

Lyapunov exponents and relative entropy for a stochastic flow of diffeomorphisms

Peter H Baxendale. Lyapunov exponents and relative entropy for a stochastic flow of diffeomorphisms. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 81(4):521--554, 1989

1989

[5] [5]

Almost-sure enhanced dissipation and uniform-in-diffusivity exponential mixing for advection--diffusion by stochastic N avier-- S tokes

Jacob Bedrossian, Alex Blumenthal, and Sam Punshon-Smith. Almost-sure enhanced dissipation and uniform-in-diffusivity exponential mixing for advection--diffusion by stochastic N avier-- S tokes. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 179(3):777--834, 2021

2021

[6] [6]

L agrangian chaos and scalar advection in stochastic fluid mechanics

Jacob Bedrossian, Alex Blumenthal, and Sam Punshon-Smith. L agrangian chaos and scalar advection in stochastic fluid mechanics. Journal of the European Mathematical Society , 24(6):1893--1990, 2022

1990

[7] [7]

Almost-sure exponential mixing of passive scalars by the stochastic N avier-- S tokes equations

Jacob Bedrossian, Alex Blumenthal, and Samuel Punshon-Smith. Almost-sure exponential mixing of passive scalars by the stochastic N avier-- S tokes equations. The Annals of Probability , 50(1):241--303, 2022

2022

[8] [8]

The B atchelor spectrum of passive scalar turbulence in stochastic fluid mechanics at fixed R eynolds number

Jacob Bedrossian, Alex Blumenthal, and Samuel Punshon-Smith. The B atchelor spectrum of passive scalar turbulence in stochastic fluid mechanics at fixed R eynolds number. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 75(6):1237--1291, 2022

2022