pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.04788 · v1 · submitted 2025-12-04 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph · physics.plasm-ph

High-repetition-rate, all-reflective optical guiding and electron acceleration in helium using an off-axis axicon

Ji\v{r}\'i \v{S}i\v{s}ma , Michal Nevrkla , Filip Vitha , Sebastian Lorenz , Illia Zymak , Al\v{z}b\v{e}ta \v{S}p\'adov\'a , Andrea Koll\'arov\'a , Mat\v{e}j Jech
show 12 more authors
Alexandr Jan\v{c}\'arek Davorin Peceli Carlo M. Lazzarini Leonardo V. N. Goncalves Gabriele M. Grittani Sergei V. Bulanov Jaron E. Shrock Ela Rockafellow Ari J. Sloss Bo Miao Scott W. Hancock Howard M. Milchberg
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 01:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph physics.plasm-ph
keywords laser wakefield accelerationplasma channeloff-axis axiconhigh repetition ratehelium plasmaself-waveguidingelectron accelerationoptical guiding
0
0 comments X

The pith

An all-reflective off-axis axicon setup creates stable self-waveguiding in a 20 cm helium plasma channel for electron acceleration approaching 5 GeV at 0.2 Hz.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how a novel all-reflective optical system with an off-axis axicon can guide intense laser pulses inside a helium plasma channel without any changes to the driving laser. This produces a 20 cm long stable channel that accelerates electrons to energies near 5 GeV while running at 0.2 Hz for full acceleration shots and up to 3.3 Hz for guiding tests. The approach uses self-waveguiding so the laser maintains its focus over long distances, leading to more consistent beam pointing and higher energy gain. A reader would care because the method keeps the setup compact and single-laser, removing a major barrier to using plasma accelerators at existing user facilities.

Core claim

By employing self-waveguiding in a 20 cm plasma channel in helium, we achieved stable acceleration of electron beams to energies approaching 5 GeV. A novel all-reflective optical setup, including an off-axis reflective axicon, enabled efficient acceleration at 0.2 Hz and guiding at repetition rates up to 3.3 Hz. This compact single laser, single compressor implementation of plasma channels for electron acceleration stabilizes electron pointing and enhances energy gain without requiring modifications to the laser system.

What carries the argument

The off-axis reflective axicon that forms a plasma channel in which self-waveguiding keeps the laser pulse focused over 20 cm in helium.

If this is right

  • Electron beam pointing becomes more stable during acceleration.
  • Energy gain increases compared with unguided or differently guided shots.
  • The same single-laser compressor can support both guiding tests at 3.3 Hz and full acceleration at 0.2 Hz.
  • No hardware changes to the driving laser are needed, allowing easier adoption at other facilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Facilities could test whether the same axicon design works with other gases or pulse lengths to reach higher energies.
  • Thermal management in the all-reflective path might allow even higher repetition rates if beam quality holds.
  • The approach could be combined with existing diagnostic tools to map how channel length affects final electron spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The self-waveguiding stays stable and the reported electron energies are accurate under the high-repetition-rate conditions with the all-reflective setup.

What would settle it

Repeated shots at 0.2 Hz that show electron energies consistently below 4 GeV or large shot-to-shot pointing fluctuations would disprove the claim of stable near-5 GeV acceleration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.04788 by Alexandr Jan\v{c}\'arek, Al\v{z}b\v{e}ta \v{S}p\'adov\'a, Andrea Koll\'arov\'a, Ari J. Sloss, Bo Miao, Carlo M. Lazzarini, Davorin Peceli, Ela Rockafellow, Filip Vitha, Gabriele M. Grittani, Howard M. Milchberg, Illia Zymak, Jaron E. Shrock, Ji\v{r}\'i \v{S}i\v{s}ma, Leonardo V. N. Goncalves, Mat\v{e}j Jech, Michal Nevrkla, Scott W. Hancock, Sebastian Lorenz, Sergei V. Bulanov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Experimental setup overview. The laser beam enters the auxiliary chamber from the left and is reflected by mirror M1. Two pick-off mirrors split small portions of the pulse to form the channel-forming and probe beams, while the main pulse continues as the LWFA drive beam. The channel-forming beam is routed through the auxiliary chamber and directed into the interaction chamber toward the off-axis axicon (O… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic layout of the interaction chamber setup for the self-waveguided LWFA experiment. (a) The final section of the optical system is shown, starting from mirror BM3, where the channel-forming (Bessel) beam enters the chamber, and including all subsequent mirrors BM3–BM7, the periscope, attenuator (half-wave plate, λ/2, and thin-film polarizer, TFP), and delay-line mirrors leading to the off-axis axico… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Simulations of laser beam wavefront splitting and focal spot. (a) Wavefront of the LWFA driver beam after the pick-offs at the off-axis parabola (OAP). (b) Wavefront of the channel-forming beam after 12 m of free-space propagation at the axicon surface. (c) Focal spot of the LWFA driver beam (a) on target [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Laser beam measurements. (a) Low-power focal￾spot image and corresponding analysis. (b) Laser pulse characterization using SPIDER measurement. HAPLS laser parameters to compare with the measured focal spots and to estimate the energy distribution in each pulse. Additionally, we simulated the free-space propagation of the Bessel beam to study diffraction-induced distortions after ap￾proximately 12 m of prop… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Guiding overview illustrating the interaction between the LWFA drive beam and the channel-forming beam, with the plasma column (yellow) highlighted between the focal plane and the waveguide exit plane above a 20 cm gas jet. (a) High￾power focal-spot diagnostic image taken through the gas sheet during active guiding, used for online alignment monitoring. (b) High-power focal spot in vacuum, recorded using t… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: High-repetition-rate guiding overview illustrating the setup used with a 3 cm slit nozzle. (a) Guided-mode profile. The lines show the region used to construct the time-evolution plot (b). (b) Evolution of the guided mode in approximately 20 minutes of operation at 3.3 Hz. Each shot is represented by a line-averaged intensity profile taken from the fixed region centered on the guided mode, as indicated in … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Selection of normalized high-energy electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present recent results on high-power guiding and laser wakefield acceleration (LWFA) in the ELBA beamline at ELI Beamlines, using the L3-HAPLS laser system (13 J, 30 fs, 0.2 Hz). By employing self-waveguiding in a 20 cm plasma channel in helium, we achieved stable acceleration of electron beams to energies approaching 5 GeV. A novel all-reflective optical setup, including an off-axis reflective axicon, enabled efficient acceleration at 0.2 Hz and guiding at repetition rates up to 3.3 Hz. This compact single laser, single compressor implementation of plasma channels for electron acceleration stabilizes electron pointing and enhances energy gain without requiring modifications to the laser system, paving the way for broader adoption of the technology across user facilities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental results from the ELBA beamline at ELI Beamlines using the L3-HAPLS laser (13 J, 30 fs pulses at 0.2 Hz). Employing self-waveguiding in a 20 cm helium plasma channel with a novel all-reflective optical setup that includes an off-axis reflective axicon, the authors claim stable acceleration of electron beams to energies approaching 5 GeV, with guiding demonstrated at repetition rates up to 3.3 Hz. The setup is presented as a compact, single-laser implementation that stabilizes electron pointing and enhances energy gain without requiring laser-system modifications.

Significance. If the central experimental claims are supported by robust diagnostics, this work would be significant for demonstrating a practical route to high-repetition-rate LWFA in long plasma channels using all-reflective optics. It directly addresses key barriers to adoption at user facilities by showing stable operation at 0.2 Hz without custom laser modifications, potentially enabling broader use of plasma-based accelerators.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section on electron spectra and plasma channel] The central claim of stable acceleration to ~5 GeV over 20 cm (stated in the abstract and results) is load-bearing on the persistence of self-waveguiding and accurate energy measurement. No quantitative diagnostics are referenced that confirm channel uniformity, such as side-view plasma emission profiles or transmitted laser mode images over the full length at 0.2 Hz; without these, it is not possible to rule out wake degradation or spectrometer offsets from beam divergence.
  2. [Experimental setup and diagnostics] The abstract and setup description state that the off-axis axicon enables efficient acceleration at 0.2 Hz, but the manuscript does not provide raw spectrometer traces with field calibration or pointing jitter statistics that would verify the reported energies are free of systematic shifts under the high-repetition-rate conditions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Notation for laser parameters (e.g., pulse energy and duration) is clear in the abstract but should be consistently repeated with error bars in the methods section for reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for any plasma or electron beam images should explicitly state the repetition rate and number of shots averaged to allow assessment of stability claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We have addressed the major comments regarding supporting diagnostics for the self-waveguiding and energy measurements point by point below, with revisions planned where they strengthen the presentation of the results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section on electron spectra and plasma channel] The central claim of stable acceleration to ~5 GeV over 20 cm (stated in the abstract and results) is load-bearing on the persistence of self-waveguiding and accurate energy measurement. No quantitative diagnostics are referenced that confirm channel uniformity, such as side-view plasma emission profiles or transmitted laser mode images over the full length at 0.2 Hz; without these, it is not possible to rule out wake degradation or spectrometer offsets from beam divergence.

    Authors: We agree that direct quantitative diagnostics of channel uniformity would provide stronger support for the persistence of self-waveguiding and help exclude wake degradation or spectrometer offsets. The manuscript reports consistent electron beam energies approaching 5 GeV and stable pointing across multiple shots at 0.2 Hz, which are consistent with sustained guiding in the 20 cm helium channel. To address this concern explicitly, we will add side-view plasma emission profiles and transmitted laser mode images over the full channel length in the revised results section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental setup and diagnostics] The abstract and setup description state that the off-axis axicon enables efficient acceleration at 0.2 Hz, but the manuscript does not provide raw spectrometer traces with field calibration or pointing jitter statistics that would verify the reported energies are free of systematic shifts under the high-repetition-rate conditions.

    Authors: The manuscript presents calibrated electron spectra and energy measurements obtained at the 0.2 Hz repetition rate of the L3-HAPLS laser. To increase transparency and directly address potential systematic shifts, we will include representative raw spectrometer traces with field calibration details together with pointing jitter statistics in a revised figure or supplementary information. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration rests on measurements, not derivations or self-referential fits

full rationale

This is an experimental paper reporting laser wakefield acceleration results in a helium plasma channel using an all-reflective axicon setup. The abstract and provided text describe physical outcomes (stable electron beams to ~5 GeV, guiding at 0.2-3.3 Hz) obtained via direct diagnostics on the ELBA beamline. No equations, ansatze, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The central claim is externally falsifiable through spectrometer traces, plasma imaging, and repetition-rate data, making the result self-contained against external benchmarks rather than internally defined.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an experimental result that rests on standard laser-plasma physics assumptions rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of laser wakefield acceleration and plasma channel formation in helium hold under the reported conditions.
    The paper invokes established LWFA physics to interpret the observed electron acceleration and guiding.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5579 in / 1128 out tokens · 49600 ms · 2026-05-17T01:47:36.215568+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tajima and J

    T. Tajima and J. M. Dawson. Laser electron accelerator.Phys. Rev. Lett., 43:267–270, Jul 1979. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.267. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.267

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.267 1979

  2. [2]

    Galletti, R

    M. Galletti, R. Assmann, M. E. Couprie, M. Ferrario, L. Giannessi, A. Irman, R. Pompili, and W. Wang. Prospects for free-electron lasers powered by plasma- wakefield-accelerated beams.Nature Photonics, 18 (8):780–791, 2024. doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01474-3. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-024-01474-3. High-rep all-reflective optical guiding and LWFA in h...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01474-3 2024

  3. [3]

    W. Wang, K. Feng, L. Ke, C. Yu, Y . Xu, R. Qi, Y . Chen, Z. Qin, Z. Zhang, M. Fang, J. Liu, K. Jiang, H. Wang, C. Wang, X. Yang, F. Wu, Y . Leng, J. Liu, R. Li, and Z. Xu. Free-electron lasing at 27 nanometres based on a laser wakefield accelerator.Nature, 595(7868):516–520,

    work page

  4. [4]

    URL https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03678-x

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03678-x. URL https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03678-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03678-x

  5. [5]

    Andr ´e, I

    T. Andr ´e, I. A. Andriyash, A. Loulergue, M. Labat, E. Roussel, A. Ghaith, M. Khojoyan, C. Thaury, M. Vall ´eau, F. Briquez, F. Marteau, K. Tavakoli, P. N’Gotta, Y . Dietrich, G. Lambert, V . Malka, C. Ben- abderrahmane, J. V ´et´eran, L. Chapuis, T. El Ajjouri, M. Sebdaoui, N. Hubert, O. Marcouill ´e, P. Berteaud, N. Leclercq, M. El Ajjouri, P. Rommelu ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03776-x

    doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03776-x. URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03776-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03776-x

  7. [7]

    Sarri, W

    G. Sarri, W. Schumaker, A. Di Piazza, M. Vargas, B. Dromey, M. E. Dieckmann, V . Chvykov, A. Mak- simchuk, V . Yanovsky, Z. H. He, B. X. Hou, J. A. Nees, A. G. R. Thomas, C. H. Keitel, M. Zepf, and K. Krushelnick. Table-top laser-based source of femtosecond, collimated, ultrarelativistic positron beams.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:255002, Jun 2013. doi:10.1103/P...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.255002 2013

  8. [8]

    Sarri, K

    G. Sarri, K. Poder, J. M. Cole, W. Schumaker, A. Di Piazza, B. Reville, T. Dzelzainis, D. Doria, L. A. Gizzi, G. Grittani, S. Kar, C. H. Keitel, K. Krushelnick, S. Kuschel, S. P. D. Mangles, Z. Najmudin, N. Shukla, L. O. Silva, D. Symes, A. G. R. Thomas, M. Vargas, J. Vieira, and M. Zepf. Generation of neutral and high-density electron–positron pair plasm...

    work page

  9. [9]

    URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms7747

    doi:10.1038/ncomms7747. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms7747

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms7747

  10. [10]

    Corde, K

    S. Corde, K. Ta Phuoc, G. Lambert, R. Fitour, V . Malka, A. Rousse, A. Beck, and E. Lefebvre. Femtosecond x rays from laser-plasma accelerators.Rev. Mod. Phys., 85:1–48, Jan 2013. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.85. 1

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.1 2013

  11. [11]

    W. Yan, C. Fruhling, G. Golovin, D. Haden, J. Luo, P. Zhang, B. Zhao, J. Zhang, C. Liu, M. Chen, S. Chen, S. Banerjee, and D. Umstadter. High-order multiphoton thomson scattering.Nature Photonics, 11(8):514–520,

    work page

  12. [12]

    URL https://doi

    doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.100. URL https://doi. org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.100

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.100 2017

  13. [13]

    Mirzaie, C

    M. Mirzaie, C. I. Hojbota, D. Y . Kim, V . B. Pathak, T. G. Pak, C. M. Kim, H. W. Lee, J. W. Yoon, S. K. Lee, Y . J. Rhee, M. Vranic, ´O. Amaro, K. Y . Kim, J. H. Sung, and C. H. Nam. All-optical nonlinear compton scattering performed with a multi-petawatt laser.Nature Photonics, 18(11):1212–1217, 2024. doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01550-8. URL https://doi.org/...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01550-8 2024

  14. [14]

    J. M. Cole, K. T. Behm, E. Gerstmayr, T. G. Blackburn, J. C. Wood, C. D. Baird, M. J. Duff, C. Harvey, A. Ilderton, A. S. Joglekar, K. Krushelnick, S. Kuschel, M. Marklund, P. McKenna, C. D. Murphy, K. Poder, C. P. Ridgers, G. M. Samarin, G. Sarri, D. R. Symes, A. G. R. Thomas, J. Warwick, M. Zepf, Z. Najmudin, and S. P. D. Mangles. Experimental evidence ...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.011020 2018

  15. [15]

    Dreesen, J

    W. Dreesen, J. A. Green, M. Browder, J. Wood, D. Schwellenbach, T. Ditmire, G. Tiwari, and C. Wagner. Detection of petawatt laser-induced muon source for rapid high-z material detection. pages 1–6,

    work page

  16. [16]

    doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.2014.7431088

    work page doi:10.1109/nssmic.2014.7431088 2014

  17. [17]

    Zhang, L

    F. Zhang, L. Deng, Y . Ge, J. Wen, B. Cui, K. Feng, H. Wang, C. Wu, Z. Pan, H. Liu, Z. Deng, Z. Zhang, L. Chen, D. Yan, L. Shan, Z. Yuan, C. Tian, J. Qian, J. Zhu, Y . Xu, Y . Yu, X. Zhang, L. Yang, W. Zhou, Y . Gu, W. Wang, Y . Leng, Z. Sun, and R. Li. Proof- of-principle demonstration of muon production with an ultrashort high-intensity laser.Nature Phy...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02872-2 2025

  18. [18]

    Terzani, S

    D. Terzani, S. Kisyov, S. Greenberg, L. Le Pottier, M. Mironova, A. Picksley, J. Stackhouse, Hai-En Tsai, R. Li, E. Rockafellow, B. Miao, J. E. Shrock, T. Heim, M. Garcia-Sciveres, C. Benedetti, J. Valentine, H. M. Milchberg, K. Nakamura, A. J. Gonsalves, J. van Tilborg, C. B. Schroeder, E. Esarey, and C. G. R. Geddes. Measurement of directional muon beam...

    work page doi:10.1103/kxjr-h7zs 2025

  19. [19]

    Poder, M

    K. Poder, M. Tamburini, G. Sarri, A. Di Piazza, S. Kuschel, C. D. Baird, K. Behm, S. Bohlen, J. M. Cole, D. J. Corvan, M. Duff, E. Gerstmayr, C. H. Keitel, K. Krushelnick, S. P. D. Mangles, P. McKenna, C. D. Murphy, Z. Najmudin, C. P. Ridgers, G. M. Samarin, D. R. Symes, A. G. R. Thomas, J. Warwick, and M. Zepf. Experimental signatures of the quantum natu...

    work page

  20. [20]

    URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031004

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031004. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031004

  21. [21]

    Gonoskov, T

    A. Gonoskov, T. G. Blackburn, M. Marklund, and S. S. Bulanov. Charged particle motion and radiation in strong electromagnetic fields. Rev. Mod. Phys., 94:045001, Oct 2022. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045001. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045001

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.045001 2022

  22. [22]

    Br ¨ummer, A

    T. Br ¨ummer, A. Debus, R. Pausch, J. Osterhoff, and F. Gr ¨uner. Design study for a compact laser- driven source for medical x-ray fluorescence imaging. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 23:031601, Mar 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.031601. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams. 23.031601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.23.031601 2020

  23. [23]

    Labate, D

    L. Labate, D. Palla, D. Panetta, F. Avella, F. Baffigi, F. Brandi, F. Di Martino, L. Fulgentini, A. Giulietti, P. K ¨oster, D. Terzani, P. Tomassini, C. Traino, and L. A. Gizzi. Toward an effective use of laser-driven very high energy electrons for radiotherapy: Feasibility assessment of multi-field and intensity modulation irradiation schemes.Scientific ...

    work page

  24. [24]

    URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74256-w

    doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74256-w. URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74256-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74256-w

  25. [25]

    Degiovanni, W

    A. Degiovanni, W. Wuensch, and J. Giner Navarro. Comparison of the conditioning of high gradient accelerating structures.Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 19:032001, Mar 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.032001. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams. 19.032001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.19.032001 2016

  26. [26]

    W. P. Leemans, B. Nagler, A. J. Gonsalves, Cs. T ´oth, K. Nakamura, C. G. R. Geddes, E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder, and S. M. Hooker. Gev electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator.Nature Physics, 2(10): 696–699, 2006. doi:10.1038/nphys418. URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/nphys418

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys418 2006

  27. [27]

    C. E. Clayton, J. E. Ralph, F. Albert, R. A. Fonseca, S. H. Glenzer, C. Joshi, W. Lu, K. A. Marsh, S. F. Martins, W. B. Mori, A. Pak, F. S. Tsung, B. B. Pollock, J. S. Ross, L. O. Silva, and D. H. Froula. Self-guided laser wakefield acceleration beyond 1 gev using ionization-induced injection.Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:105003, Sep 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.105003 2010

  28. [28]

    B. Miao, J. E. Shrock, L. Feder, R. C. Hollinger, J. Morrison, R. Nedbailo, A. Picksley, H. Song, S. Wang, J. J. Rocca, and H. M. Milchberg. Multi- gev electron bunches from an all-optical laser wakefield accelerator.Phys. Rev. X, 12:031038, Sep 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031038. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031038

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.031038 2022

  29. [29]

    Aniculaesei, T

    C. Aniculaesei, T. Ha, S. Yoffe, L. Labun, S. Milton, E. McCary, M. M. Spinks, H. J. Quevedo, O. Z. Labun, R. Sain, A. Hannasch, R. Zgadzaj, I. Pagano, J. A. Franco-Altamirano, M. L. Ringuette, E. Gaul, S. V . Luedtke, G. Tiwari, B. Ersfeld, E. Brunetti, H. Ruhl, T. Ditmire, S. Bruce, M. E. Donovan, M. C. Downer, D. A. Jaroszynski, and B. M. Hegelich. The...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0161687 2023

  30. [30]

    C. B. Schroeder, E. Esarey, C. G. R. Geddes, C. Benedetti, and W. P. Leemans. Physics considerations for laser-plasma linear colliders. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 13:101301, Oct 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.13.101301. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.13.101301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevstab.13.101301 2010

  31. [31]

    H. T. Kim, K. H. Pae, H. J. Cha, I J. Kim, T. J. Yu, J. H. Sung, S. K. Lee, T. M. Jeong, and J. Lee. Enhancement of electron energy to the multi-gev regime by a dual- stage laser-wakefield accelerator pumped by petawatt laser pulses.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:165002, Oct 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.165002. URL https:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLet...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.165002 2013

  32. [32]

    Morozov, A

    A. Morozov, A. Goltsov, Q. Chen, M. Scully, and S. Suckewer. Ionization assisted self-guiding of femtosecond laser pulses.Physics of Plas- mas, 25(5):053110, 05 2018. ISSN 1070-664X. doi:10.1063/1.5021795. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1. 5021795

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5021795 2018

  33. [33]

    Lemos, L

    N. Lemos, L. Cardoso, J. Geada, G. Figueira, F. Albert, and J. M. Dias. Guiding of laser pulses in plasma waveguides created by linearly-polarized femtosecond laser pulses.Scientific Reports, 8(1):3165, 2018. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21392-z. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-018-21392-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21392-z 2018

  34. [34]

    R. J. Shalloo, C. Arran, L. Corner, J. Holloway, J. Jonnerby, R. Walczak, H. M. Milchberg, and S. M. Hooker. Hydrodynamic optical-field-ionized plasma channels.Phys. Rev. E, 97:053203, May 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.97.053203. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.053203

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.97.053203 2018

  35. [35]

    Smartsev, C

    S. Smartsev, C. Caizergues, K. Oubrerie, J. Gautier, J.-P. Goddet, A. Tafzi, K. Ta Phuoc, V . Malka, and C. Thaury. Axiparabola: a long-focal-depth, high-resolution mirror for broadband high-intensity lasers.Opt. Lett., 44(14):3414–3417, Jul 2019. doi:10.1364/OL.44.003414. URL https://opg.optica. org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-44-14-3414

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.44.003414 2019

  36. [36]

    R. J. Shalloo, C. Arran, A. Picksley, A. von Boetticher, L. Corner, J. Holloway, G. Hine, J. Jonnerby, H. M. Milchberg, C. Thornton, R. Walczak, and S. M. Hooker. Low-density hydrodynamic optical-field- ionized plasma channels generated with an axicon High-rep all-reflective optical guiding and LWFA in helium with an off-axis axicon11 lens.Phys. Rev. Acce...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.22.041302 2019

  37. [37]

    B. Miao, L. Feder, J. E. Shrock, A. Goffin, and H. M. Milchberg. Optical guiding in meter-scale plasma waveguides.Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:074801, Aug 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.074801. URL https:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.074801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.074801 2020

  38. [38]

    Feder, B

    L. Feder, B. Miao, J. E. Shrock, A. Goffin, and H. M. Milchberg. Self-waveguiding of relativistic laser pulses in neutral gas channels.Phys. Rev. Res., 2:043173, Nov

    work page

  39. [39]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043173. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2. 043173

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043173

  40. [40]

    Picksley, A

    A. Picksley, A. Alejo, J. Cowley, N. Bourgeois, L. Corner, L. Feder, J. Holloway, H. Jones, J. Jonnerby, H. M. Milchberg, L. R. Reid, A. J. Ross, R. Walczak, and S. M. Hooker. Guiding of high-intensity laser pulses in 100-mm-long hydrodynamic optical-field-ionized plasma channels. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 23:081303, Aug 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.23.081303 2020

  41. [41]

    Picksley, A

    A. Picksley, A. Alejo, R. J. Shalloo, C. Ar- ran, A. von Boetticher, L. Corner, J. A. Hol- loway, J. Jonnerby, O. Jakobsson, C. Thornton, R. Walczak, and S. M. Hooker. Meter-scale conditioned hydrodynamic optical-field-ionized plasma channels.Phys. Rev. E, 102:053201, Nov 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.053201. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev...

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.102.053201 2020

  42. [42]

    J. E. Shrock, B. Miao, L. Feder, and H. M. Milchberg. Meter-scale plasma waveguides for multi-gev laser wakefield acceleration.Physics of Plasmas, 29(7):073101, 07 2022. ISSN 1070-664X. doi:10.1063/5.0097214. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0097214

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0097214 2022

  43. [43]

    J. E. Shrock, E. Rockafellow, B. Miao, M. Le, R. C. Hollinger, S. Wang, A. J. Gonsalves, A. Picksley, J. J. Rocca, and H. M. Milchberg. Guided mode evolution and ionization injection in meter-scale multi-gev laser wakefield accelerators.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:045002, Jul 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.045002. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.045002 2024

  44. [44]

    Rockafellow, B

    E. Rockafellow, B. Miao, J. E. Shrock, A. Sloss, M. S. Le, S. W. Hancock, S. Zahedpour, R. C. Hollinger, S. Wang, J. King, P. Zhang, J. ˇSiˇsma, G. M. Grittani, R. Versaci, D. F. Gordon, G. J. Williams, B. A. Reagan, J. J. Rocca, and H. M. Milchberg. Development of a high charge 10 gev laser electron accelerator.Physics of Plasmas, 32(5):053102, 05 2025. ...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0265640 2025

  45. [45]

    Picksley, J

    A. Picksley, J. Stackhouse, C. Benedetti, K. Nakamura, H. E. Tsai, R. Li, B. Miao, J. E. Shrock, E. Rockafellow, H. M. Milchberg, C. B. Schroeder, J. van Tilborg, E. Esarey, C. G. R. Geddes, and A. J. Gonsalves. Matched guiding and controlled injection in dark- current-free, 10-gev-class, channel-guided laser-plasma accelerators.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:2550...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.255001 2024

  46. [46]

    B. Miao, E. Rockafellow, J. E. Shrock, S. W. Hancock, D. Gordon, and H. M. Milchberg. Benchmarking of hydrodynamic plasma waveguides for multi-gev laser-driven electron acceleration. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 27:081302, Aug 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.27.081302. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams. 27.081302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.27.081302 2024

  47. [47]

    N. A. Bobrova, A. A. Esaulov, J.-I. Sakai, P. V . Sasorov, D. J. Spence, A. Butler, S. M. Hooker, and S. V . Bulanov. Simulations of a hydrogen-filled capillary discharge waveguide.Phys. Rev. E, 65:016407, Dec

    work page

  48. [48]

    URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.016407

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.65.016407. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.016407

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.65.016407

  49. [49]

    Butler, D

    A. Butler, D. J. Spence, and S. M. Hooker. Guiding of high-intensity laser pulses with a hydrogen-filled capillary discharge waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:185003, Oct 2002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.185003. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.185003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.185003 2002

  50. [50]

    Karsch, J

    S. Karsch, J. Osterhoff, A. Popp, T. P. Rowlands-Rees, Z. Major, M. Fuchs, B. Marx, R. H ¨orlein, K. Schmid, L. Veisz, S. Becker, U. Schramm, B. Hidding, G. Pretzler, D. Habs, F. Gr ¨uner, F. Krausz, and S. M. Hooker. Gev-scale electron acceleration in a gas-filled capillary discharge waveguide.New Journal of Physics, 9(11):415, nov 2007. doi:10.1088/1367...

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/11/415 2007

  51. [51]

    T. P. Rowlands-Rees, C. Kamperidis, S. Kneip, A. J. Gonsalves, S. P. D. Mangles, J. G. Gallacher, E. Brunetti, T. Ibbotson, C. D. Murphy, P. S. Foster, M. J. V . Streeter, F. Budde, P. A. Norreys, D. A. Jaroszynski, K. Krushelnick, Z. Najmudin, and S. M. Hooker. Laser-driven acceleration of electrons in a partially ionized plasma chan- nel.Phys. Rev. Lett...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.105005 2008

  52. [52]

    A. J. Gonsalves, K. Nakamura, J. Daniels, C. Benedetti, C. Pieronek, T. C. H. de Raadt, S. Steinke, J. H. Bin, S. S. Bulanov, J. van Tilborg, C. G. R. Geddes, C. B. Schroeder, Cs. T ´oth, E. Esarey, K. Swanson, L. Fan-Chiang, G. Bagdasarov, N. Bobrova, V . Gasilov, 12 J. ˇSiˇ sma et al. G. Korn, P. Sasorov, and W. P. Leemans. Petawatt laser guiding and el...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.084801 2019

  53. [53]

    Tripathi, B

    N. Tripathi, B. Miao, A. Sloss, E. Rockafellow, J. E. Shrock, S. W. Hancock, and H. M. Milch- berg. Longitudinal shaping of plasma waveguides using diffractive axicons for laser wakefield accel- eration.Opt. Lett., 50(10):3441–3444, May 2025. doi:10.1364/OL.561318. URL https://opg.optica.org/ol/ abstract.cfm?URI=ol-50-10-3441

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.561318 2025

  54. [54]

    C. G. Durfee and H. M. Milchberg. Light pipe for high intensity laser pulses.Phys. Rev. Lett., 71:2409–2412, Oct 1993. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2409. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2409

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.2409 1993

  55. [55]

    C. G. Durfee, J. Lynch, and H. M. Milchberg. Development of a plasma waveguide for high-intensity laser pulses.Phys. Rev. E, 51:2368–2389, Mar 1995. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.51.2368. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.2368

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.51.2368 1995

  56. [56]

    Lorenz, G

    S. Lorenz, G. Grittani, E. Chacon-Golcher, C. M. Lazzarini, J. Limpouch, F. Nawaz, M. Nevrkla, L. Vilanova, and T. Levato. Characterization of supersonic and subsonic gas targets for laser wakefield electron acceleration experiments.Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 4(1):015401, 01 2019. ISSN 2468-2047. doi:10.1063/1.5081509. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5081509 2019

  57. [57]

    B. Miao, J. E. Shrock, E. Rockafellow, A. J. Sloss, and H. M. Milchberg. Meter-scale supersonic gas jets for multi-gev laser-plasma accelerators.Review of Scientific Instruments, 96(4):043003, 04 2025. ISSN 0034-6748. doi:10.1063/5.0248959. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0248959

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0248959 2025

  58. [58]

    C. V . Pieronek, A. J. Gonsalves, C. Benedetti, S. S. Bulanov, J. van Tilborg, J. H. Bin, K. K. Swanson, J. Daniels, G. A. Bagdasarov, N. A. Bobrova, V . A. Gasilov, G. Korn, P. V . Sasorov, C. G. R. Geddes, C. B. Schroeder, W. P. Leemans, and E. Esarey. Laser-heated capillary discharge waveguides as tunable structures for laser-plasma acceleration.Physic...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0014961 2020

  59. [59]

    B. Miao, L. Feder, J. E. Shrock, and H. M. Milchberg. Phase front retrieval and correction of bessel beams.Opt. Express, 30(7):11360–11371, Mar 2022. doi:10.1364/OE.454796. URL https://opg.optica.org/ oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-30-7-11360

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.454796 2022

  60. [60]

    Turner, S

    M. Turner, S. S. Bulanov, C. Benedetti, A. J. Gonsalves, W. P. Leemans, K. Nakamura, J. van Tilborg, C. B. Schroeder, C. G. R. Geddes, and E. Esarey. Strong-field qed experiments using the bella pw laser dual beamlines. The European Physical Journal D, 76(11):205, 2022. doi:10.1140/epjd/s10053-022-00535-y. URL https:// doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-022-00535-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/s10053-022-00535-y 2022

  61. [61]

    Boucher, J

    P. Boucher, J. Del Hoyo, C. Billet, O. Pinel, G. Labroille, and F. Courvoisier. Generation of high conical angle bessel-gauss beams with reflective axicons.Appl. Opt., 57(23):6725–6728, Aug 2018. doi:10.1364/AO.57.006725. URL https://opg.optica. org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-57-23-6725

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.57.006725 2018

  62. [62]

    P. B. Corkum, N. H. Burnett, and F. Brunel. Above-threshold ionization in the long-wavelength limit.Phys. Rev. Lett., 62:1259–1262, Mar 1989. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1259. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1259

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.1259 1989

  63. [63]

    X. M. Tong and C. D. Lin. Empirical formula for static field ionization rates of atoms and molecules by lasers in the barrier-suppression regime.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 38(15):2593, jul 2005. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/38/15/001. URL https: //doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/38/15/001

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/38/15/001 2005

  64. [64]

    Alejo, J

    A. Alejo, J. Cowley, A. Picksley, R. Walczak, and S. M. Hooker. Demonstration of kilohertz operation of hydrodynamic optical-field-ionized plasma channels. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 25:011301, Jan 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.25.011301. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams. 25.011301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.25.011301 2022

  65. [65]

    C. M. Lazzarini, L. V . Goncalves, G. M. Grittani, S. Lorenz, M. Nevrkla, P. Valenta, T. Levato, S. V . Bulanov, and G. Korn. Electron acceleration at eli-beamlines: Towards high-energy and high- repetition rate accelerators.International Jour- nal of Modern Physics A, 34(34):1943010, 2019. doi:10.1142/S0217751X19430103. URL https://doi. org/10.1142/S0217...

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x19430103 2019

  66. [66]

    Willemsen, U

    T. Willemsen, U. Chaulagain, I. Havl´ıˇckov´a, S. Borneis, W. Ebert, H. Ehlers, M. Gauch, . Groß, D. Kramer, T. Laˇstoviˇcka, J. Nejdl, B. Rus, K. Schrader, T. Tolenis, F. Vanˇek, P. K. Velpula, and S. Weber. Large area ion beam sputtered dielectric ultrafast mirrors for petawatt laser beamlines.Opt. Express, 30(4):6129–6141, Feb

    work page

  67. [67]

    URL https://opg.optica

    doi:10.1364/OE.452249. URL https://opg.optica. org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-30-4-6129

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.452249

  68. [68]

    J. M. Auerbach and V . P. Karpenko. Serrated- aperture apodizers for high-energy laser systems.Appl. Opt., 33(15):3179–3183, May

    work page

  69. [69]

    URL https: //opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-33-15-3179

    doi:10.1364/AO.33.003179. URL https: //opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-33-15-3179

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.33.003179

  70. [70]

    Iaconis and I

    C. Iaconis and I. A. Walmsley. Spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction of ultrashort optical pulses.Opt. Lett., 23(10):792–794, May 1998. doi:10.1364/OL.23.000792. URL https: //opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-23-10-792. High-rep all-reflective optical guiding and LWFA in helium with an off-axis axicon13

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.23.000792 1998

  71. [71]

    T. M. Antonsen, Jr. and P. Mora. Leaky channel stabilization of intense laser pulses in tenuous plas- mas.Phys. Rev. Lett., 74:4440–4443, May 1995. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4440. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4440

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4440 1995

  72. [72]

    T. R. Clark and H. M. Milchberg. Optical mode structure of the plasma waveguide.Phys. Rev. E, 61:1954–1965, Feb 2000. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.61.1954. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.61.1954

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.61.1954 1954