pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.06322 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Kitaev Meets Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki: Competing Quantum Disorder in Spin-3/2 Honeycomb Systems

Sogen Ikegami , Kiyu Fukui , Rico Pohle , Yukitoshi Motome This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 01:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords Kitaev quantum spin liquidAKLT valence bond solidhoneycomb latticespin-3/2exact diagonalizationquantum fluctuationsquantum disordered phases
0
0 comments X

The pith

In an S=3/2 honeycomb spin model, full quantum fluctuations melt classically predicted noncoplanar orders into an entangled phase linking Kitaev and AKLT states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a spin-3/2 model on the honeycomb lattice whose interactions interpolate continuously between the Kitaev quantum spin liquid and the AKLT valence bond solid. Classical and semi-classical treatments find noncoplanar magnetic orders competing with a collinear Néel state. Exact diagonalization that includes all quantum fluctuations shows these ordered phases disappear, leaving a state with strongly suppressed spin correlations and higher entanglement entropy. The work shows how competition between two distinct quantum-disordered limits can produce an extended entangled regime stabilized by fluctuations.

Core claim

In the S=3/2 honeycomb spin model that interpolates between Kitaev and AKLT interactions, the noncoplanar orders predicted by classical and semi-classical frameworks prove fragile; once full quantum fluctuations are restored through exact diagonalization, they melt into a quantum-entangled state characterized by suppressed spin correlations and enhanced entanglement entropy over the entire parameter range.

What carries the argument

The interpolation parameter between Kitaev anisotropic exchange and AKLT biquadratic terms, whose ground states are compared via exact diagonalization on finite clusters to expose the fragility of semi-classical orders.

If this is right

  • The phase diagram is dominated by a single broad quantum-entangled region rather than multiple distinct ordered phases.
  • Spin correlations stay short-ranged for all interpolation strengths between the Kitaev and AKLT limits.
  • Entanglement entropy rises in the intermediate regime where classical orders are destroyed.
  • The Kitaev liquid and AKLT solid remain stable at the endpoints but connect through this intervening entangled state.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar melting of semi-classical order may occur in other lattice geometries or spin values when two different quantum-disordered phases are interpolated.
  • Candidate materials with S=3/2 honeycomb moments could be probed for the predicted suppression of magnetic Bragg peaks alongside large entanglement signatures.
  • Tensor-network or infinite-size methods would provide a direct test of whether the entangled phase survives without order in the thermodynamic limit.

Load-bearing premise

Finite-cluster exact diagonalization results reliably signal the absence of long-range order in the thermodynamic limit for all values of the interpolation parameter.

What would settle it

Observation of Bragg peaks or finite staggered magnetization in larger-scale simulations or in a physical S=3/2 honeycomb material would falsify the claim that the ordered phases melt completely.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.06322 by Kiyu Fukui, Rico Pohle, Sogen Ikegami, Yukitoshi Motome.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (b). Small EE indicates that the classical and semi-classical approaches are good approximations, while large EE signals significant quantum entanglement be￾yond these approximations. For 0.25 ≲ ξ ≲ 0.75, S(q)/N exhibits strong intensi￾ties corresponding to the FM and zigzag orders, and the relatively small EE supports that the classical and semi-classical results in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: presents the momentum dependence of S(q)/N for several ξ values within this competing regime, for N = 8 (upper panels) and N = 12 (lower panels). At the FM Kitaev point (ξ = 0.75), S(q)/N exhibits no pronounced peaks for either cluster, consistent with the Kitaev QSL. At the AKLT point (ξ = 1.0), peaks appear at the Γ′ points, but their intensities diminish from N = 8 to 12—a hallmark of short-range AFM co… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate an S=3/2 quantum spin model on a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice that continuously interpolates between two paradigmatic quantum disordered states with distinct entanglement structures: the Kitaev quantum spin liquid and the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki (AKLT) valence bond solid. Combining classical, semi-classical, and exact diagonalization approaches, we map out the ground-state phase diagram and elucidate the role of quantum fluctuations across the entire parameter range. While classical and semi-classical frameworks predict noncoplanar orders competing with a collinear N\'eel state, we find these phases to be fragile: once full quantum fluctuations are included, they melt into a quantum-entangled state characterized by suppressed spin correlations and enhanced entanglement entropy. Our findings highlight how competition between qualitatively different quantum disordered phases provides a fertile playground for unconventional phases emerging from their interplay and quantum fluctuations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies an S=3/2 quantum spin model on the honeycomb lattice that interpolates between the Kitaev quantum spin liquid and the AKLT valence bond solid. Combining classical, semi-classical, and exact diagonalization methods, it maps the ground-state phase diagram and argues that classical and semi-classical predictions of competing noncoplanar orders and a collinear Néel state are fragile; full quantum fluctuations melt these orders into a quantum-entangled disordered phase marked by suppressed spin correlations and enhanced entanglement entropy.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work demonstrates how competition between two distinct quantum disordered phases (Kitaev QSL and AKLT VBS) can stabilize unconventional entangled states via quantum fluctuations in S=3/2 systems. The multi-method strategy, including numerical exploration of an explicitly defined interpolated Hamiltonian, offers a concrete example of phase fragility in frustrated magnets.

major comments (1)
  1. [Exact diagonalization results and phase diagram section] The central claim that classical/semi-classical orders melt under full quantum fluctuations rests on exact diagonalization results showing suppressed spin correlations and enhanced entanglement entropy. For S=3/2 on the honeycomb lattice the Hilbert space restricts clusters to small sizes (typically N≤24), and the manuscript provides no finite-size scaling of the structure factor, Binder cumulants, or order parameters to the thermodynamic limit; the observed suppression could therefore reflect finite-size rounding rather than true absence of long-range order across the interpolation range.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that classical and semi-classical frameworks predict noncoplanar orders but does not reference the specific classical energy minimization or spin-wave calculation details that would allow direct comparison with the ED data.
  2. [Model definition] Notation for the interpolation parameter and the precise form of the Hamiltonian (e.g., the relative weighting of Kitaev and AKLT terms) should be defined explicitly in the main text with an equation number for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment on the exact diagonalization analysis. We address the concern regarding finite-size effects below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that classical/semi-classical orders melt under full quantum fluctuations rests on exact diagonalization results showing suppressed spin correlations and enhanced entanglement entropy. For S=3/2 on the honeycomb lattice the Hilbert space restricts clusters to small sizes (typically N≤24), and the manuscript provides no finite-size scaling of the structure factor, Binder cumulants, or order parameters to the thermodynamic limit; the observed suppression could therefore reflect finite-size rounding rather than true absence of long-range order across the interpolation range.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's point on the challenges of finite-size scaling for S=3/2 systems. The Hilbert space dimension of 4^N indeed restricts accessible clusters to N≤24. In the manuscript we report results for multiple cluster sizes up to this limit, where spin correlations remain suppressed and entanglement entropy is enhanced with no growing signatures of order. We agree that a full extrapolation to the thermodynamic limit via structure factors or Binder cumulants is not provided and is not feasible with current ED resources. We will revise the manuscript to add an explicit discussion of these finite-size limitations and the consistency of trends within the studied sizes, while noting that the multi-method approach (including classical and semi-classical results) provides complementary support for the fragility of the ordered phases. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A complete finite-size scaling analysis to the thermodynamic limit for the S=3/2 honeycomb model using exact diagonalization, due to prohibitive growth of the Hilbert space beyond N=24.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation rests on independent numerical methods applied to explicitly defined interpolated Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper defines an interpolated Hamiltonian between the Kitaev and AKLT limits on the S=3/2 honeycomb lattice, then applies separate classical, semiclassical, and exact-diagonalization calculations to extract spin correlations, structure factors, and entanglement entropy. The central claim—that noncoplanar and Néel orders predicted classically become fragile and melt into a quantum-entangled state—is obtained directly from these computations on finite clusters rather than by any self-referential definition, fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No uniqueness theorems, ansatzes smuggled via prior author work, or renaming of known results are used to force the outcome; the numerical evidence is self-contained against the model's explicit parameters.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum spin models and established numerical techniques applied to an interpolated Hamiltonian; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • interpolation parameter
    A continuous tuning parameter connects the Kitaev and AKLT limits and is used to map the phase diagram across the full range.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard S=3/2 quantum spin Hamiltonian on the honeycomb lattice with Kitaev and AKLT-type interactions.
    The model is defined as continuously interpolating between the two paradigmatic states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5467 in / 1306 out tokens · 91423 ms · 2026-05-17T01:28:46.853745+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 016502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum spin liquid states, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 025003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    X. G. WEN, TOPOLOGICAL ORDERS IN RIGID STATES, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B04, 239 (1990)

    work page 1990

  5. [5]

    X. G. Wen and Q. Niu, Ground-state degeneracy of the fractional quantum Hall states in the presence of a random potential and on high-genus Riemann surfaces, Phys. Rev. B41, 9377 (1990)

    work page 1990

  6. [6]

    Dennis, A

    E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, Topo- logical quantum memory, J. Math. Phys.43, 4452 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys.303, 2 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Vidal, J

    G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, Entangle- ment in Quantum Critical Phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227902 (2003)

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann. Phys.321, 2 (2006)

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological Entanglement En- tropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110404 (2006)

    work page 2006

  11. [11]

    Levin and X.-G

    M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Detecting Topological Order in a Ground State Wave Function, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110405 (2006)

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mater

    P. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mater. Res. Bull.8, 153 (1973)

    work page 1973

  14. [14]

    Kalmeyer and R

    V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, Equivalence of the resonating-valence-bond and fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2095 (1987)

    work page 2095

  15. [15]

    D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity and the Quantum Hard-Core Dimer Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2376 (1988)

    work page 1988

  16. [16]

    X. G. Wen, Vacuum degeneracy of chiral spin states in compactified space, Phys. Rev. B40, 7387 (1989)

    work page 1989

  17. [17]

    X. G. Wen, Mean-field theory of spin-liquid states with finite energy gap and topological orders, Phys. Rev. B 44, 2664 (1991)

    work page 1991

  18. [18]

    J. Nasu, M. Udagawa, and Y. Motome, Vaporization of Kitaev Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 197205 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Hwang, Anyon condensation and confinement transi- tion in a Kitaev spin liquid bilayer, Phys

    K. Hwang, Anyon condensation and confinement transi- tion in a Kitaev spin liquid bilayer, Phys. Rev. B109, 134412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rig- orous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 799 (1987)

    work page 1987

  21. [21]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Valence bond ground states in isotropic quantum antiferromag- nets, Commun. Math. Phys.115, 477 (1988)

    work page 1988

  22. [22]

    Kennedy, E

    T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, A two- dimensional isotropic quantum antiferromagnet with unique disordered ground state, J. Stat. Phys.53, 383 (1988)

    work page 1988

  23. [23]

    Baskaran, S

    G. Baskaran, S. Mandal, and R. Shankar, Exact Results for Spin Dynamics and Fractionalization in the Kitaev Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 247201 (2007)

    work page 2007

  24. [24]

    Baskaran, D

    G. Baskaran, D. Sen, and R. Shankar, Spin-SKitaev model: Classical ground states, order from disorder, and exact correlation functions, Phys. Rev. B78, 115116 (2008)

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    Ma,Z 2 Spin Liquids in the Higher Spin-SKitaev Hon- eycomb Model: An Exact DeconfinedZ 2 Gauge Struc- ture in a Nonintegrable Model, Phys

    H. Ma,Z 2 Spin Liquids in the Higher Spin-SKitaev Hon- eycomb Model: An Exact DeconfinedZ 2 Gauge Struc- ture in a Nonintegrable Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 156701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Wang and A

    F. Wang and A. Vishwanath, Z 2 spin-orbital liquid state in the square lattice Kugel-Khomskii model, Phys. Rev. B80, 064413 (2009)

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Yao, S.-C

    H. Yao, S.-C. Zhang, and S. A. Kivelson, Algebraic Spin Liquid in an Exactly Solvable Spin Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 217202 (2009)

    work page 2009

  28. [28]

    H.-K. Jin, W. M. H. Natori, F. Pollmann, and J. Knolle, Unveiling theS= 3/2 Kitaev honeycomb spin liquids, Nat. Commun.13, 3813 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    W. M. H. Natori, H.-K. Jin, and J. Knolle, Quantum liq- uids of theS= 3 2 Kitaev honeycomb and related Kugel- Khomskii models, Phys. Rev. B108, 075111 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Huang, X

    C.-Y. Huang, X. Chen, and F.-L. Lin, Symmetry- protected quantum state renormalization, Phys. Rev. B 88, 205124 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    T.-C. Wei, I. Affleck, and R. Raussendorf, Affleck- Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki State on a Honeycomb Lattice is a Universal Quantum Computational Resource, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 070501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Miyake, Quantum computational capability of a 2D valence bond solid phase, Ann

    A. Miyake, Quantum computational capability of a 2D valence bond solid phase, Ann. Phys.326, 1656 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    T.-C. Wei, P. Haghnegahdar, and R. Raussendorf, Hy- brid valence-bond states for universal quantum compu- tation, Phys. Rev. A90, 042333 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    A. J. Raja and R. Ganesh, The Kitaev-AKLT model, arXiv:2510.12880 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    A. M. Perelomov, Coherent states for arbitrary Lie group, Commun. Math. Phys.26, 222 (1972)

    work page 1972

  36. [36]

    Gnutzmann and M

    S. Gnutzmann and M. Kus, Coherent states and the classical limit on irreducible representations, J. Phys. A, Math. Gen.31, 9871 (1998)

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    Nemoto, Generalized coherent states forSU(n) sys- tems, J

    K. Nemoto, Generalized coherent states forSU(n) sys- tems, J. Phys. A, Math. Gen.33, 3493 (2000)

    work page 2000

  38. [38]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. Sachdev, Some features of the phase dia- gram of the square lattice SU(N) antiferromagnet, Nucl. 6 Phys. B316, 609 (1989)

    work page 1989

  39. [39]

    E. M. Stoudenmire, S. Trebst, and L. Balents, Quadrupo- lar correlations and spin freezing inS= 1 triangular lat- tice antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B79, 214436 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Zhang and C

    H. Zhang and C. D. Batista, Classical spin dynamics based on SU(n) coherent states, Phys. Rev. B104, 104409 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Pohle, N

    R. Pohle, N. Shannon, and Y. Motome, Spin nematics meet spin liquids: Exotic quantum phases in the spin- 1 bilinear-biquadratic model with Kitaev interactions, Phys. Rev. B107, L140403 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Iwazaki, H

    R. Iwazaki, H. Shinaoka, and S. Hoshino, Material-based analysis of spin-orbital Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 108, L241108 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Pohle, Y

    R. Pohle, Y. Motome, T. Tadano, and S. Hoshino, Electron-phonon coupled Langevin dynamics for Mott in- sulators, arXiv:2507.19764 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, arXiv:1412.6980 (2017)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. Van- derPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, JAX: com- posable transformations of Python+NumPy programs (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Babuschkin, K

    DeepMind, I. Babuschkin, K. Baumli, A. Bell, S. Bhu- patiraju, J. Bruce, P. Buchlovsky, D. Budden, T. Cai, A. Clark, I. Danihelka, A. Dedieu, C. Fantacci, J. God- win, C. Jones, R. Hemsley, T. Hennigan, M. Hes- sel, S. Hou, S. Kapturowski, T. Keck, I. Kemaev, M. King, M. Kunesch, L. Martens, H. Merzic, V. Miku- lik, T. Norman, G. Papamakarios, J. Quan, R....

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    See Supplemental Material for additional notes on de- tails of methods, spin structures of noncoplanar orders, generalized spin-wave analysis, and effect of anisotropy

    work page

  48. [48]

    Momoi, K

    T. Momoi, K. Kubo, and K. Niki, Possible Chiral Phase Transition in Two-Dimensional Solid 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 2081 (1997)

    work page 2081

  49. [49]

    Akagi and Y

    Y. Akagi and Y. Motome, Spin Chirality Ordering and Anomalous Hall Effect in the Ferromagnetic Kondo Lat- tice Model on a Triangular Lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 083711 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Messio, C

    L. Messio, C. Lhuillier, and G. Misguich, Lattice symme- tries and regular magnetic orders in classical frustrated antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B83, 184401 (2011)

    work page 2011

  51. [51]

    Pohle, N

    R. Pohle, N. Shannon, and Y. Motome, Eight-color chiral spin liquid in theS= 1 bilinear-biquadratic model with Kitaev interactions, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033077 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    R. A. Muniz, Y. Kato, and C. D. Batista, Generalized spin-wave theory: Application to the bilinear-biquadratic model, Prog. theor. exp. phys.2014, 083I01 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Fukui, Y

    K. Fukui, Y. Kato, J. Nasu, and Y. Motome, Ground- state phase diagram of spin-SKitaev-Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. B106, 174416 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Georgiou, I

    M. Georgiou, I. Rousochatzakis, D. J. J. Farnell, J. Richter, and R. F. Bishop, Spin-SKitaev-Heisenberg model on the honeycomb lattice: A high-order treatment via the many-body coupled cluster method, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033168 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Liu, T.-L

    G.-X. Liu, T.-L. Wang, and Y.-F. Jiang, Quantum phase diagram of the extended spin-3/2 Kitaev-Heisenberg model: A DMRG study, arXiv:2503.24246 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Wang and Z.-X

    J. Wang and Z.-X. Liu, Effect of ring-exchange interac- tions in the extended Kitaev honeycomb model, Phys. Rev. B108, 014437 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Jin and Y

    J.-T. Jin and Y. Zhou, Effective field theory for triple-Q magnetic orders on a hexagonal lattice, arXiv:2503.18649 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Hickey, L

    C. Hickey, L. Cincio, Z. Papi´ c, and A. Paramekanti, Emergence of chiral spin liquids via quantum melting of noncoplanar magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. B96, 115115 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Oliviero, J

    F. Oliviero, J. A. Sobral, E. C. Andrade, and R. G. Pereira, Noncoplanar magnetic orders and gapless chiral spin liquid on the kagome lattice with staggered scalar spin chirality, SciPost Phys.13, 050 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Yao and S

    H. Yao and S. A. Kivelson, Exact Chiral Spin Liquid with Non-Abelian Anyons, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 247203 (2007)

    work page 2007

  61. [61]

    Nasu and Y

    J. Nasu and Y. Motome, Thermodynamics of Chiral Spin Liquids with Abelian and Non-Abelian Anyons, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 087203 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    d’Ornellas and J

    P. d’Ornellas and J. Knolle, Kitaev-Heisenberg model on the star lattice: From chiral Majorana fermions to chiral triplons, Phys. Rev. B109, 094421 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    C. Xu, J. Feng, H. Xiang, and L. Bellaiche, Interplay between Kitaev interaction and single ion anisotropy in ferromagnetic CrI 3 and CrGeTe 3 monolayers, npj Com- put. Mater.4, 57 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    M. Kim, P. Kumaravadivel, J. Birkbeck, W. Kuang, S. G. Xu, D. G. Hopkinson, J. Knolle, P. A. McClarty, A. I. Berdyugin, M. Ben Shalom, R. V. Gorbachev, S. J. Haigh, S. Liu, J. H. Edgar, K. S. Novoselov, I. V. Grig- orieva, and A. K. Geim, Micromagnetometry of two- dimensional ferromagnets, Nat. Electron.2, 457 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    I. Lee, F. G. Utermohlen, D. Weber, K. Hwang, C. Zhang, J. van Tol, J. E. Goldberger, N. Trivedi, and P. C. Hammel, Fundamental Spin Interactions Underly- ing the Magnetic Anisotropy in the Kitaev Ferromagnet CrI3, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 017201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    P. P. Stavropoulos, X. Liu, and H.-Y. Kee, Magnetic anisotropy in spin-3/2 with heavy ligand in honeycomb Mott insulators: Application to CrI 3, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013216 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Koch-Janusz, D

    M. Koch-Janusz, D. I. Khomskii, and E. Sela, Affleck- Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki State on a Honeycomb Lattice fromt 2g Orbitals, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 247204 (2015). 1 Supplemental Material for Kitaev Meets AKLT: Competing Quantum Disorder in Spin-3/2 Honeycomb Systems Sogen Ikegami1, Kiyu Fukui2, Rico Pohle 3, and Yukitoshi Motome 1 1Department of Applied Physic...

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    In small clusters with high symmetry, ED calculations often yield a ground state that is a cat state, i.e., a su- perposition of symmetry-related degenerate states. This 4 1.02.0 0.0!(#)%⁄ !0.000.250.500.751.00(AFM Kitaev)(FM Kitaev)(AKLT) (AKLT) 1.02.0 0.0!(#)%⁄ ΓΓ′X′M′XM'!=1.01 '!=1.05 2.52.01.51.00.50.0 !(#)%⁄ '!=1.01'!=1.05'!=1.00'=0.30 '=0.76 (b) (a)...

    work page