Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 58 references

Equiaffine immersions and pseudo-Riemannian space forms

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Every non-degenerate equiaffine immersion, via the conormal map, yields horizontal φ-anti-invariant immersions into S^{n,n+1} and H^{n+1,n}; these are maximal exactly when the dual immersion is a proper affine sphere.

desk verdict The σ± correspondence is genuinely useful, but the boundary-at-infinity application has a projective-limit flaw that sinks Lemma 4.3 and Theorem E as stated. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.09569 v2 pith:HFZPDGHM submitted 2025-12-10 math.DG math.GTmath.SG

Nicholas Rungi This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.GTmath.SG MSC 53A1553C4253C5053C43
keywords equiaffineimmersionconormalmappseudo-Riemannianspaceformspara-complexhyperbolicpara-SasakimetricproperaffinespheremaximalsubmanifoldBlaschkelift
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes an explicit bridge between affine differential geometry of hypersurfaces in R^{n+1} and pseudo-Riemannian geometry of neutral signature (n+1, n+1). Starting from any non-degenerate equiaffine immersion (f, ξ) with invertible shape operator, it builds two immersions σ+ and σ− from the pair (ξ, ν) formed by the transverse vector field and the conormal map; these land in the pseudosphere S^{n,n+1} and the pseudohyperbolic space H^{n+1,n}, are horizontal and φ-anti-invariant for the para-Sasaki structure, and their induced metrics coincide with the affine metric of the dual immersion. Projecting to the para-complex hyperbolic space H^n_τ turns them into Lagrangian immersions, and the construction is reversible on simply connected domains. The paper's central equivalence is that these immersions are maximal exactly when the conormal map is a proper affine sphere, which yields new existence and uniqueness results for maximal submanifolds with prescribed boundary at infinity, as well as a proof that the Blaschke lift of a hyperbolic affine sphere into the symmetric space of SL(n+1,R) is harmonic.

What carries the argument

The central object is the pair (ξ,ν) built from an equiaffine immersion: ξ is the transverse (affine normal) vector field and ν is the conormal map into the dual space. The neutral bilinear form ġ and the R-action (v,φ) ↦ (e^t v, e^{−t}φ) make H^{n+1,n} a principal R-bundle over the para-Kähler para-complex hyperbolic space H^n_τ; the para-Sasaki metric comes from this bundle. The equivalence between maximality and proper affine spheres is carried by the identification of the mean curvature of σ− with the trace of the Pick tensor of the dual immersion, and the inverse construction is governed by the closed 1-form α(X)=ν_*(X)(f), whose exactness on simply connected domains selects the horizon

What would settle it

For n=1, take an affine curve that is not a proper affine sphere (for instance a parabola in R^2), and compute the geodesic curvature of the induced curve σ−(t) = (−ξ(t), ν(t)) in H^{2,1} ≅ AdS3 using the structure equations. Nonzero curvature at any point would confirm Corollary B; identically zero curvature on a non-affine-sphere curve would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

With the bilinear form ġ((v,φ),(w,ψ)) = ½(φ(w)+ψ(v)), the pair σ−(p) = (−ξ_p, ν_p) lies in the quadric ġ = −1, namely H^{n+1,n}, and σ+ = (ξ,ν) lies in the unit quadric. The paper proves that these are immersions, horizontal with respect to the contact distribution, and φ-anti-invariant with respect to the para-complex structure; the induced metric equals the affine metric of the dual immersion ν. The mean curvature of σ− is, up to a constant, the trace of the Pick tensor of ν, so maximality is equivalent to ν being a proper affine sphere. Conversely, on a simply connected M, every non-degenerate Lagrangian immersion into H^n_τ admits a unique (up to constants) horizontal lift whose induced

Load-bearing premise

The paper relies on the deep theorem that every properly convex domain in real projective space is asymptotic to a unique complete hyperbolic affine sphere; if that existence or the equivalence between properness and completeness of the Blaschke metric failed, the boundary-at-infinity results would collapse, though the core σ± correspondence would still stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every non-degenerate equiaffine immersion with det(S)≠0 produces a horizontal, φ-anti-invariant immersion into S^{n,n+1} or H^{n+1,n} whose induced metric is the dual affine metric; maximality of this immersion is equivalent to the conormal map being a proper affine sphere.
  • On simply connected manifolds, non-degenerate Lagrangian immersions into the para-complex hyperbolic space H^n_τ are in bijection, up to homothety, with dual pairs of proper affine spheres; the horizontal lift is selected by an exact 1-form.
  • For any properly convex Ω ⊂ RP^n there exists an n-dimensional spacelike maximal complete submanifold in H^{n+1,n} with boundary at infinity the hyperplane boundary set Λ_Ω, unique up to the R-action; if Ω is strictly convex, the boundary is parametrized by ∂Ω.
  • The Blaschke lift of a hyperbolic affine sphere into the symmetric space of SL(n+1,R) is harmonic for every n ≥ 2, and composing with the inclusion into the symmetric space of SO0(n+1,n+1) preserves harmonicity.
  • The construction recovers known examples in n=1 (geodesics in AdS3, Barbot's flat maximal surfaces) and n=2 (Collier–Toulisse alternating holomorphic curves), showing the correspondence generalizes them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference — The correspondence suggests a transfer principle: affine differential invariants (Pick tensor, shape operator, affine metric) translate into extrinsic invariants (second fundamental form, mean curvature) of submanifolds in neutral-signature space forms, potentially allowing existence theorems to be imported in either direction beyond the cases treated here.
  • Editorial inference — The equivariant version of the boundary theorem, under a discrete subgroup preserving Ω, should produce Anosov representations of the group into SO0(n+1,n+1) with boundary maps exactly the hyperplane boundary sets; this would connect the construction to known higher Teichmüller spaces and is a natural next step not taken in the paper.
  • Editorial inference — The harmonicity of the Blaschke lift likely extends to equivariant settings where the affine sphere is only locally defined, giving harmonic maps from convex projective manifolds into symmetric spaces; this could be tested by checking the tension field in a closed example.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an explicit correspondence between non-degenerate equiaffine immersions (f, ξ) in R^{n+1} and immersions σ_± = (±ξ, ν) into the neutral-signature quadrics S^{n,n+1} and H^{n+1,n}. The main results of §3 are: σ_± is horizontal and φ-anti-invariant, its induced metric equals the dual affine metric, its mean curvature is controlled by the trace of the dual Pick tensor, and it is maximal exactly when the conormal map ν is a proper affine sphere. The paper then gives an inverse construction: from a non-degenerate Lagrangian immersion of a simply connected M into the para-complex hyperbolic space H^n_τ it produces a horizontal lift and dual centroaffine immersions. Two applications are developed: a boundary-at-infinity problem for maximal spacelike n-submanifolds in the projective model ̂H^{n+1,n} associated with properly convex sets Ω ⊂ RP^n, and a proof that Labourie's Blaschke lift of a hyperbolic affine sphere is harmonic in all dimensions, with a variant into the symmetric space of SO_0(n+1,n+1).

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a new and fairly explicit bridge between affine differential geometry and pseudo-Riemannian space forms, including a one-parameter family construction, a converse for Lagrangian immersions, and new examples of maximal submanifolds whose dimension is not the dimension of the positive part of the ambient space. The computations in §3 are detailed and internally consistent: Lemma 3.7, Theorem 3.13, and the harmonic-map argument in §4.2 are supported by explicit formulas and cited external facts. The inverse theorem and the harmonicity of the Blaschke lift are substantial contributions. However, the boundary-at-infinity application, Theorem 4.5, rests on a projective-limit argument that is not valid as written, and the boundary set in Definition 4.1 is not scale-invariant; these issues affect the advertised first application.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, Lemma 4.3] The proof equates ∂∞σ_− with {[v, φ_v] : v ∈ ∂C(Ω), φ_v supporting at v}. It defines f_∞ = lim f(p_k)/||f(p_k)|| and ν_∞ = lim ν(p_k)/||ν(p_k)|| and then asserts that [−f_∞, ν_∞] is a projective limit of the pairs (−f(p_k), ν(p_k)). This is not valid: a projective limit in P(V) requires a single scalar normalization of the pair, while separate normalizations change the projective class unless ||ν(p_k)||/||f(p_k)|| converges to a positive finite limit. The concrete Calabi/Ţiţeica example in Section 3.4.3 gives boundary points of the form [0, (1,0,0)] ∈ ∂∞σ_− even though 0 ∉ ∂C(Ω). Thus the equality in Lemma 4.3 fails as stated, and Theorem 4.5's boundary identification is not established.
  2. [§4.1, Definition 4.1] The hyperplane boundary set Λ_Ω is not a well-defined subset of P(V). For a point v ∈ ∂C(Ω), a supporting functional φ_v is determined only up to a non-zero scalar, and [v, φ_v] changes under independent rescalings: [λv, μφ_v] = [v, μλ^{-1}φ_v]. Since φ_v(v)=0, one cannot normalize using φ_v(v)=1. The manuscript gives no convention fixing the ratio, so the set Λ_Ω (and hence the statement of Theorem 4.5) is not well-defined. This is a load-bearing issue for the whole boundary application, although it does not affect the core correspondence of §3.
  3. [§4.1, Theorem 4.5] The uniqueness statement is not proved. The proof shows that all rescaled immersions σ_t^- = (−e^t f, e^{-t}ν) have the same boundary and that the hyperbolic affine sphere asymptotic to C_+(Ω) is unique up to homothety. That only establishes uniqueness among the constructed examples. It does not rule out another n-dimensional spacelike maximal horizontal φ-anti-invariant submanifold with the same boundary but not arising from a hyperbolic affine sphere. If uniqueness is intended in the full class stated in the theorem, an additional argument is required.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §1.2] The abstract states the first application as existence/uniqueness of a maximal Lagrangian submanifold in H^n_τ, while Theorem 4.5 and the introduction's description state it for H^{n+1,n} with boundary Λ_Ω. Please reconcile these formulations.
  2. [§2.2, Theorem 2.15] The statement says 'properly convex subset Ω ⊂ R^{n+1}', but the surrounding discussion concerns Ω ⊂ RP^n. This appears to be a typo and should be corrected.
  3. [§4.2.3, Eq. (24)] The notation X^† is used for the h-metric dual 1-form of X, but this is not defined at that point. Please add a definition or a reference to the preceding paragraph.
  4. [§4.1, Definition 4.1] The phrase 'φ_v supporting hyperplane at v' is ambiguous for v on the boundary of the cone: a supporting hyperplane in projective space corresponds to a linear functional with ker φ_v containing v, i.e. φ_v(v)=0. This fact is used later but should be stated explicitly, especially since it creates the normalization problem noted above.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central construction, maximality criteria, inverse problem, and harmonic-map application are derived from explicit computations and external theorems; the only self-citations are incidental identifications.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain. The central object σ− = (−ξ, ν) is defined explicitly from an equiaffine immersion and its conormal, and the induced metric is computed directly from the affine structure equations (Theorem 3.5). The maximality criterion (Corollary 3.8) follows from a concrete mean-curvature computation in Lemma 3.7 together with the external characterization of proper affine spheres cited as Proposition 2.7; the paper does not define maximality in terms of affine spheres nor fit a parameter to the conclusion. The inverse problem (Theorems 3.13 and Corollary 3.14) constructs a horizontal lift via a closed 1-form on a simply connected manifold and then checks duality by direct computation; it does not assume the desired affine-sphere result. The boundary theorem (Theorem 4.5) rests on the external Cheng–Yau/Gigena/Sasaki/Li existence and uniqueness of hyperbolic affine spheres, and Lemma 4.3 attempts to verify the boundary by projective limits rather than postulating it. The harmonic Blaschke lift (Theorem 4.13) is proved by computing the tension field in terms of the Pick tensor and using Lemma 2.9, which is proved in the paper. No parameter is fitted to data and no prediction reduces by construction to an input. The self-citations [RT24, RT25] are used only to identify the para-complex hyperbolic space and its curvature; they are not load-bearing for the main correspondence. The possible boundary-normalization issue in Lemma 4.3 flagged by a skeptical reading is a mathematical correctness concern, not a circularity, and it does not affect the independent derivation in Section 3.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's derivations rest on standard affine differential geometry and on two deep external theorems: the Cheng–Yau–Gigena existence of hyperbolic affine spheres asymptotic to prescribed cones, and the Benoist–Hulin characterization of proper affine spheres. No free parameters are fitted, and no new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Standard structure equations, conormal map properties and dual connections for equiaffine immersions (Nomizu–Sasaki [NS94])
    Used throughout §2.1–§3 to define σ± and compute induced metrics and curvatures.
  • standard math Proper affine spheres are characterized by the vanishing trace of the Pick tensor (Proposition 2.7, Benoist–Hulin [BH13, Lemma 4.4])
    Essential for Corollary 3.8 and the maximality equivalence.
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness, for every properly convex Ω ⊂ RP^n, of a hyperbolic affine sphere asymptotic to ∂C+(Ω) with complete Blaschke metric (Theorem 2.15, Cheng–Yau, Gigena, Sasaki, Li)
    Load-bearing for the boundary problem (Theorem 4.5) and for the harmonic map theorem.
  • domain assumption The conormal map of a hyperbolic affine sphere is again a hyperbolic affine sphere and is an isometry of the affine metrics (Shirokov–Shirokov/Gigena, as cited in §2.2)
    Used in Lemma 4.3 to identify the boundary at infinity with supporting hyperplanes.
  • domain assumption H^n_τ is the para-Kähler quotient of S^{n,n+1} or H^{n+1,n} by the diagonal SO0(1,1)-action, with the stated para-complex structure (Proposition 3.10, [Tre19, RT24])
    The para-Kähler base structure is used for the Lagrangian and inverse constructions; the para-Sasaki metric itself is built in Appendix B.
  • standard math For a Blaschke immersion with det(S)≠0, the tensor T(X,Y,Z,W)=h((∇^h_X A)(Y)Z,W) is totally symmetric iff the immersion is a proper affine sphere (Lemma 2.8, [NS94])
    Used in the proof of Theorem 4.13 to conclude the tension of the Blaschke lift vanishes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Equiaffine immersions and pseudo-Riemannian space forms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HFZPDGHM

@misc{pith2026251209569,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Equiaffine immersions and pseudo-Riemannian space forms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HFZPDGHM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.09569}
}
abstract

We introduce an explicit construction that produces immersions into the pseudosphere $\mathbb{S}^{n,n+1}$ and the pseudohyperbolic space $\mathbb{H}^{n+1,n}$ starting from equiaffine immersions in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, and conversely. We describe how these immersions interact with a para-Sasaki metric defined on $\mathbb{H}^{n+1,n}$ via a principal $\mathbb{R}$-bundle structure over a para-K\"ahler manifold $\mathbb H_\tau^n$, called the para-complex hyperbolic space. In the case where the immersion in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ is an $n$-dimensional hyperbolic affine sphere, we obtain spacelike maximal immersions in $\mathbb{H}^{n+1,n}$ that satisfy a transversality condition with respect to the principal $\mathbb{R}$-bundle structure. As a first application, given a strictly convex subset $\Omega \subset \mathbb{RP}^n$, we define a boundary set $\overline{\Lambda}_\Omega$ in the partial flag variety of lines and hyperplanes in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, and prove the existence and uniqueness of a spacelike, Lagrangian, maximal $n$-submanifold in $\mathbb H^n_\tau$ with boundary $\overline{\Lambda}_\Omega$. We also discuss its implications in the case of $\mathbb H^{n+1,n}$. As a second application, we show that the Blaschke lift of the hyperbolic affine sphere, introduced by Labourie for $n=2$, into the symmetric space of $\mathrm{SL}(n+1,\mathbb{R})$ is a harmonic map.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Cosmological time versus cmc time in spacetimes of constant curvature

    Lars Andersson, Thierry Barbot, Fran c ois B \'e guin, and Abdelghani Zeghib. Cosmological time versus cmc time in spacetimes of constant curvature. Asian Journal of Mathematics , 16(1):37--88, 2012

    2012

  2. [2]

    Minimal submanifolds in pseudo-Riemannian geometry

    Henri Anciaux. Minimal submanifolds in pseudo-Riemannian geometry . World Scientific, 2011

    2011

  3. [3]

    Deformations of fuchsian ads representations are quasi-fuchsian

    Thierry Barbot. Deformations of fuchsian ads representations are quasi-fuchsian. Journal of Differential Geometry , 101(1):1--46, 2015

    2015

  4. [4]

    Convexes divisibles I

    Yves Benoist. Convexes divisibles I . Comptes Rendus de l'Acad \'e mie des Sciences-Series I-Mathematics , 332(5):387--390, 2001

    2001

  5. [5]

    Convexes divisibles II

    Yves Benoist. Convexes divisibles II . Duke Mathematical Journal , 120(1), 2003

    2003

  6. [6]

    Convexes divisibles III

    Yves Benoist. Convexes divisibles III . Annales scientifiques de l’ecole normale sup \'e rieure , 38(5):793--832, 2005

    2005

  7. [7]

    Convexes divisibles IV

    Yves Benoist. Convexes divisibles IV . Invent. math , 164(2):249--278, 2006

    2006

  8. [8]

    Einstein manifolds

    Arthur L Besse. Einstein manifolds . Springer, 2007

    2007

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Cubic differentials and finite volume convex projective surfaces

    Yves Benoist and Dominique Hulin. Cubic differentials and finite volume convex projective surfaces. Geometry & Topology , 17(1):595--620, 2013

    2013

  2. [10]

    H ^ p,q -convex cocompactness and higher higher T eichm\"uller spaces

    Jonas Beyrer and Fanny Kassel. H ^ p,q -convex cocompactness and higher higher T eichm\"uller spaces. arXiv:2305.15031 (to appear in: GAFA) , 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Maximal surfaces and the universal teichm \"u ller space

    Francesco Bonsante and Jean-Marc Schlenker. Maximal surfaces and the universal teichm \"u ller space. Inventiones mathematicae , 182(2):279--333, 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    Anti-de sitter geometry and T eichm \"u ller theory

    Francesco Bonsante and Andrea Seppi. Anti-de sitter geometry and T eichm \"u ller theory. In the tradition of Thurston: Geometry and topology , pages 545--643, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Complete affine hyperspheres I

    Eugenio Calabi. Complete affine hyperspheres I . In Instituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica Symposia Mathematica , volume 10, pages 19--38, 1972

    1972

  6. [14]

    Anosov representations: Informal lecture notes, 2021

    Richard Canary. Anosov representations: Informal lecture notes, 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    On convex projective manifolds and cusps

    Daryl Cooper, DD Long, and Stephan Tillmann. On convex projective manifolds and cusps. Advances in Mathematics , 277:181--251, 2015

    2015

  8. [16]

    Special geometry of euclidean supersymmetry 1

    Vicente Cort \'e s, Christoph Mayer, Thomas Mohaupt, and Frank Saueressig. Special geometry of euclidean supersymmetry 1. V ectormultiplets. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2004(03):028, 2004

    2004

  9. [17]

    James Cockle. I I I . O n a new imaginary in algebra. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science , 34(226):37--47, 1849

  10. [18]

    Holomorphic curves in the 6-pseudosphere and cyclic surfaces

    Brian Collier and J \'e r \'e my Toulisse. Holomorphic curves in the 6-pseudosphere and cyclic surfaces. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 377(09):6465--6514, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    The geometry of maximal representations of surface groups into SO _0(2,n)

    Brian Collier, Nicolas Tholozan, and J\' e r\' e my Toulisse. The geometry of maximal representations of surface groups into SO _0(2,n) . Duke Math. J. , 168(15):2873--2949, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    On the regularity of the M onge- A mp \`e re equation det ( ^2 u x_i x_j )= f (x, u)

    Shiu-Yuen Cheng and Shing-Tung Yau. On the regularity of the M onge- A mp \`e re equation det ( ^2 u x_i x_j )= f (x, u) . Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 30(1):41--68, 1977

    1977

  13. [21]

    Complete affine hypersurfaces

    Shiu-Yuen Cheng and Shing-Tung Yau. Complete affine hypersurfaces. P art i. T he completeness of affine metrics. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 39(6):839--866, 1986

    1986

  14. [22]

    Convex cocompactness in pseudo- R iemannian hyperbolic spaces

    Jeffrey Danciger, Fran c ois Gu \'e ritaud, and Fanny Kassel. Convex cocompactness in pseudo- R iemannian hyperbolic spaces. Geometriae Dedicata , 192(1):87--126, 2018

    2018

  15. [23]

    Half-dimensional immersions into the para-complex projective space and R uh-- V ilms type theorems

    Josef F Dorfmeister, Roland Hildebrand, and Shimpei Kobayashi. Half-dimensional immersions into the para-complex projective space and R uh-- V ilms type theorems. Results in Mathematics , 79(7):245, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Locally homogeneous axiom a flows II : geometric structures for A nosov subgroups

    Benjamin Delarue, Daniel Monclair, and Andrew Sanders. Locally homogeneous axiom a flows II : geometric structures for A nosov subgroups. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.20195 , 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    Conjugate connections and R adon's theorem in affine differential geometry

    Franki Dillen, Katsumi Nomizu, and Luc Vranken. Conjugate connections and R adon's theorem in affine differential geometry. Monatshefte f \"u r Mathematik , 109(3):221--235, 1990

    1990

  18. [26]

    On the G auss map of equivariant immersions in hyperbolic space

    Christian El Emam and Andrea Seppi. On the G auss map of equivariant immersions in hyperbolic space. Journal of topology , 15(1):238--301, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Selected topics in harmonic maps , volume 50

    James Eells and Luc Lemaire. Selected topics in harmonic maps , volume 50. American Mathematical Soc., 1983

    1983

  20. [28]

    Harmonic mappings of R iemannian manifolds

    James Eells and Joseph H Sampson. Harmonic mappings of R iemannian manifolds. American journal of mathematics , 86(1):109--160, 1964

    1964

  21. [29]

    Integral invariants of convex cones

    Salvador Gigena. Integral invariants of convex cones. Journal of Differential Geometry , 13(2):191--222, 1978

    1978

  22. [30]

    On a conjecture by E

    Salvador Gigena. On a conjecture by E . C alabi. Geometriae Dedicata , 11(4):387--396, 1981

    1981

  23. [31]

    Anosov representations: domains of discontinuity and applications

    Olivier Guichard and Anna Wienhard. Anosov representations: domains of discontinuity and applications. Inventiones mathematicae , 190(2):357--438, 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    Some notes on differentiable manifolds with almost contact structures

    Yoji Hatakeyama. Some notes on differentiable manifolds with almost contact structures. Tohoku Mathematical Journal, Second Series , 15(2):176--181, 1963

    1963

  25. [33]

    Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces , volume 80

    Sigurdur Helgason. Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces , volume 80. Academic press, 1979

    1979

  26. [34]

    The cross-ratio manifold: a model of centro-affine geometry

    Roland Hildebrand. The cross-ratio manifold: a model of centro-affine geometry. International Electronic Journal of Geometry , 4(2):32--62, 2011

    2011

  27. [35]

    Half-dimensional immersions in para- K \"a hler manifolds

    Roland Hildebrand. Half-dimensional immersions in para- K \"a hler manifolds. International Electronic Journal of Geometry , 4(2):85--113, 2011

    2011

  28. [36]

    Anti-invariant submanifolds of a S asakian space form

    Ikuo Ishihara. Anti-invariant submanifolds of a S asakian space form. Kodai Mathematical Journal , 2(2):171--186, 1979

    1979

  29. [37]

    Flat projective structures on surfaces and cubic holomorphic differentials

    Fran c ois Labourie. Flat projective structures on surfaces and cubic holomorphic differentials. Pure Appl. Math. Q. , 3(4, Special Issue: In honor of Grigory Margulis. Part 1):1057--1099, 2007

    2007

  30. [38]

    Cyclic surfaces and H itchin components in rank 2

    Fran c ois Labourie. Cyclic surfaces and H itchin components in rank 2. Annals of Mathematics , 185(1):1--58, 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    Calabi conjecture on hyperbolic affine hyperspheres

    An-Min Li. Calabi conjecture on hyperbolic affine hyperspheres. Mathematische Zeitschrift , 203(1):483--491, 1990

    1990

  32. [40]

    Calabi conjecture on hyperbolic affine hyperspheres (2)

    An-Min Li. Calabi conjecture on hyperbolic affine hyperspheres (2). Mathematische Annalen , 293(1):485--493, 1992

    1992

  33. [41]

    Para-sasakian -symmetric spaces

    Eugenia Loiudice. Para-sasakian -symmetric spaces. Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry , 67(1):4, 2025

    2025

  34. [42]

    Global affine differential geometry of hypersurfaces

    An-Min Li, Udo Simon, Guosong Zhao, and Zejun Hu. Global affine differential geometry of hypersurfaces . de Gruyter, 2015

    2015

  35. [43]

    Quasicircles and quasiperiodic surfaces in pseudo-hyperbolic spaces

    Fran c ois Labourie and J \'e r \'e my Toulisse. Quasicircles and quasiperiodic surfaces in pseudo-hyperbolic spaces. Inventiones mathematicae , pages 1--88, 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    Plateau problems for maximal surfaces in pseudo-hyperbolic space

    Fran c ois Labourie, J \'e r \'e my Toulisse, and Michael Wolf. Plateau problems for maximal surfaces in pseudo-hyperbolic space. Annales Scientifiques de lEcole Normale Sup \'e rieure , 57(2), 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Introduction to symplectic topology , volume 27

    Dusa McDuff and Dietmar Salamon. Introduction to symplectic topology , volume 27. Oxford University Press, 2017

    2017

  38. [46]

    Rigidity for complete maximal spacelike submanifolds in pseudo-hyperbolic space

    Alex Moriani and Enrico Trebeschi. Rigidity for complete maximal spacelike submanifolds in pseudo-hyperbolic space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10352 , 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    Affine differential geometry: geometry of affine immersions

    Katsumi Nomizu and Takeshi Sasaki. Affine differential geometry: geometry of affine immersions . Cambridge university press, 1994

    1994

  40. [48]

    Regular domains and surfaces of constant gaussian curvature in 3-dimensional affine space

    Xin Nie and Andrea Seppi. Regular domains and surfaces of constant gaussian curvature in 3-dimensional affine space. Analysis & PDE , 15(3):643--697, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Complex L agrangian minimal surfaces, bi-complex H iggs bundles and SL(3, C ) -quasi- F uchsian representations

    Nicholas Rungi and Andrea Tamburelli. Complex L agrangian minimal surfaces, bi-complex H iggs bundles and SL(3, C ) -quasi- F uchsian representations. arXiv:2406.14945 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Para-complex geometry and cyclic H iggs bundles

    Nicholas Rungi and Andrea Tamburelli. Para-complex geometry and cyclic H iggs bundles. arXiv:2503.01615 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Hyperbolic affine hyperspheres

    Takeshi Sasaki. Hyperbolic affine hyperspheres. Nagoya Mathematical Journal , 77:107--123, 1980

    1980

  44. [52]

    Affine differentialgeometrie

    Petr Alekseevich Shirokov and Aleksandr Petrovich Shirokov. Affine differentialgeometrie. Teubner , 1962

    1962

  45. [53]

    On complete maximal submanifolds in pseudo-hyperbolic space

    Andrea Seppi, Graham Smith, and J \'e r \'e my Toulisse. On complete maximal submanifolds in pseudo-hyperbolic space. arXiv:2305.15103 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Steve J. Trettel. Families of geometries, real algebras, and transitions . University of California, Santa Barbara, 2019

    2019

  47. [55]

    Constant mean curvature hypersurfaces in anti-de sitter space

    Enrico Trebeschi. Constant mean curvature hypersurfaces in anti-de sitter space. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2024(9):8026--8066, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    Centroaffine differential geometry and its relations to horizontal submanifolds

    Luc Vrancken. Centroaffine differential geometry and its relations to horizontal submanifolds. Banach Center Publications , 57(1):21--28, 2002

    2002

  49. [57]

    Anti-invariant submanifolds of S asakian space forms I

    Kentaro Yano and Masahiro Kon. Anti-invariant submanifolds of S asakian space forms I . Tohoku Mathematical Journal, Second Series , 29(1):9--23, 1977

    1977

  50. [58]

    Canonical connections on paracontact manifolds

    Simeon Zamkovoy. Canonical connections on paracontact manifolds. Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry , 36(1):37--60, 2009

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.