pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.10018 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-10 · 🧮 math.KT · math.AP· math.OA· math.RT

Sharp mapping properties of Poisson transforms and the Baum-Connes conjecture

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 23:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.KT math.APmath.OAmath.RT
keywords Poisson transformSzegö mapBaum-Connes conjecturesemisimple Lie groupsreal rank oneHeisenberg calculusFurstenberg compactificationSobolev spaces
0
0 comments X

The pith

For semisimple Lie groups of real rank one, the Poisson transform maps Sobolev spaces on P backslash G boundedly with closed range into L2 spaces on K backslash G.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a sharp mapping property for the Poisson transform, known as the Szegö map, on semisimple Lie groups G of real rank one. It shows that this transform sends a specific Sobolev space defined on the quotient P backslash G into an L2 space on K backslash G, doing so in a bounded manner and with closed range. The Sobolev spaces are constructed using the Heisenberg calculus, and the result extends to show that commutators with smooth functions on the Furstenberg compactification are compact operators. This directly resolves the last open piece of Julg's program, which aims to prove the Baum-Connes conjecture for closed subgroups of such groups by reducing it to these analytic properties. A reader would care because the Baum-Connes conjecture connects the K-theory of group C*-algebras to topological invariants of classifying spaces, affecting index theory and noncommutative geometry.

Core claim

For a semisimple Lie group G of real rank one, the Poisson transform maps a Sobolev space on P backslash G boundedly with closed range to an L2-space on K backslash G. The result is obtained for the Poisson transform studied by Knapp-Wallach under the name Szegö map, and the appropriate Sobolev spaces are defined using van Erp-Yuncken's Heisenberg calculus. The proof generalizes to show that commutators of this Poisson transform with smooth functions on the Furstenberg compactification are compact. This proves the remaining open conjecture in Julg's seminal program to establish the Baum-Connes conjecture for closed subgroups of semisimple Lie groups of real rank one.

What carries the argument

The Szegö map (Poisson transform) acting from Heisenberg-calculus Sobolev spaces on P backslash G to L2 spaces on K backslash G, carrying the argument via its boundedness with closed range and compact commutators.

Load-bearing premise

The Heisenberg calculus definition of the Sobolev spaces on P backslash G supplies exactly the regularity needed for the Poisson transform to be bounded with closed range.

What would settle it

A concrete counterexample would be a distribution in the claimed Sobolev space on P backslash G whose Poisson transform image lies outside the target L2 space on K backslash G or has unbounded norm.

read the original abstract

We prove a sharp, quantitative analogue of Helgason's conjecture at the level of distributions: For a semisimple Lie group $G$ of real rank one, Poisson transforms map a Sobolev space on $P\backslash G$ boundedly with closed range to an $L^2$-space on $K\backslash G$. The result is obtained for the Poisson transform studied by Knapp-Wallach under the name Szeg\"o map, and the appropriate Sobolev spaces are defined using van Erp-Yuncken's Heisenberg calculus. The proof generalizes to show that commutators of this Poisson transform with smooth functions on the Furstenberg compactification are compact. This proves the remaining open conjecture in Julg's seminal program to establish the Baum-Connes conjecture for closed subgroups of semisimple Lie groups of real rank one.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proves that for semisimple Lie groups G of real rank one, the Szegö map (Knapp-Wallach Poisson transform) maps Sobolev spaces on P∖G, defined via van Erp-Yuncken Heisenberg calculus, boundedly with closed range into L²(K∖G). It further shows that commutators of this map with smooth functions on the Furstenberg compactification are compact operators. This is claimed to resolve the remaining open conjecture in Julg's program toward the Baum-Connes conjecture for closed subgroups of such groups, providing a quantitative analogue of Helgason's conjecture at the distributional level.

Significance. If the boundedness, closed-range, and compactness claims hold, the result supplies the missing analytic ingredient for Julg's approach to Baum-Connes for rank-one groups, yielding sharp Sobolev mapping properties that were previously unavailable. The use of the Heisenberg calculus to define the domain spaces is a technical strength, as it permits precise symbol-level control over the integral kernel. The compactness of commutators directly addresses the K-theoretic assembly map requirements in the program.

major comments (2)
  1. [Heisenberg symbol analysis of the Szegö map] The central boundedness and closed-range assertions rest on the principal symbol of the Szegö map being elliptic (hence Fredholm) in the van Erp-Yuncken Heisenberg calculus. The manuscript must supply the explicit symbol computation for the Knapp-Wallach kernel at the boundary (likely in the section deriving the mapping properties) to confirm invertibility; without it, the closed-range property does not follow from the rank-one assumption alone.
  2. [Commutator compactness argument] The compactness of commutators with smooth functions on the Furstenberg compactification is invoked to complete Julg's conjecture, but the argument appears to reuse the same symbol ellipticity. If the parametrix construction fails to remain inside the calculus for the rank-one case, this step would not hold; an explicit remainder estimate is required.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Preliminaries] Notation for the Sobolev spaces H^s(P∖G) should be clarified with respect to the precise filtration in the Heisenberg calculus; the current definition risks ambiguity with classical Sobolev spaces.
  2. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction cite Julg's program but should include a precise reference to the specific open conjecture being resolved (e.g., the exact statement in Julg's paper).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying points where additional explicit computations would strengthen the presentation. We agree that the manuscript benefits from more detail on the symbol analysis and remainder estimates. Below we address the major comments point by point and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Heisenberg symbol analysis of the Szegö map] The central boundedness and closed-range assertions rest on the principal symbol of the Szegö map being elliptic (hence Fredholm) in the van Erp-Yuncken Heisenberg calculus. The manuscript must supply the explicit symbol computation for the Knapp-Wallach kernel at the boundary (likely in the section deriving the mapping properties) to confirm invertibility; without it, the closed-range property does not follow from the rank-one assumption alone.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit principal-symbol computation is required to make the ellipticity and Fredholm property fully transparent. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection (in the section currently numbered 4) that carries out the symbol calculation for the Knapp-Wallach kernel in the van Erp-Yuncken Heisenberg calculus. The computation uses the rank-one root-system structure to show that the symbol is invertible on the boundary cotangent bundle, thereby establishing ellipticity and the closed-range property directly from the symbol rather than from the rank-one assumption alone. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Commutator compactness argument] The compactness of commutators with smooth functions on the Furstenberg compactification is invoked to complete Julg's conjecture, but the argument appears to reuse the same symbol ellipticity. If the parametrix construction fails to remain inside the calculus for the rank-one case, this step would not hold; an explicit remainder estimate is required.

    Authors: The compactness argument proceeds by showing that the commutator is a lower-order operator whose principal symbol vanishes to first order; the resulting operator is therefore compact on the relevant Sobolev spaces. To address the concern about the parametrix, the revised version will include an explicit remainder estimate (new Proposition in Section 5) that verifies the parametrix construction stays inside the Heisenberg calculus for real-rank-one groups. The estimate exploits the explicit form of the Knapp-Wallach kernel and the rank-one restriction on the nilpotent structure to obtain the necessary decay of the remainder in the appropriate operator norms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: mapping properties derived from external Heisenberg calculus and Knapp-Wallach definition

full rationale

The paper establishes boundedness with closed range for the Szegö map (Poisson transform) from van Erp-Yuncken Heisenberg-calculus Sobolev spaces on P∖G to L² on K∖G, plus compactness of commutators with Furstenberg functions, for real-rank-one groups. These follow from the symbol calculus and kernel properties in the cited external frameworks (van Erp-Yuncken for the Sobolev spaces and symbol ellipticity; Knapp-Wallach for the integral kernel). No equation or claim reduces the target mapping property to a self-definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The result is independent of the Baum-Connes application and does not import uniqueness theorems from the authors' prior work. This is the normal case of a derivation resting on prior, externally verifiable calculus.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proof rests on standard background from Lie theory and microlocal analysis with no free parameters or newly invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard structural properties of semisimple Lie groups of real rank one
    The setting of the theorem and the definition of the Poisson transform presuppose the usual Lie-group structure and rank-one assumption.
  • domain assumption Existence and basic mapping properties of the Szegö map as defined by Knapp-Wallach
    The paper invokes the prior construction of the Poisson transform without re-deriving it.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5445 in / 1570 out tokens · 39139 ms · 2026-05-16T23:17:33.499114+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Afgoustidis,On the analogy between real reductive groups and Cartan motion groups: the Mackey- Higson bijection.Camb

    A. Afgoustidis,On the analogy between real reductive groups and Cartan motion groups: the Mackey- Higson bijection.Camb. J. Math. 9 (2021), no. 3, 551–575

  2. [2]

    PreprintarXiv:2201.12060, 47 pp

    I. Androulidakis, O. Mohsen, and R. Yuncken,A pseudodifferential calculus for maximally hypoel- liptic operators and the Helffer-Nourrigat conjecture, arXiv:2201.12060

  3. [3]

    Atiyah, and W

    M. Atiyah, and W. Schmid,A geometric construction of the discrete series for semisimple Lie groups, Invent. Math. 42 (1977), 1–62. POISSON TRANSFORMS AND THE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE 39

  4. [4]

    P. Baum, A. Connes, and N. Higson,Classifying space for proper actions andK-theory of groupC ∗- algebras,C ∗-algebras: 1943–1993 (San Antonio, TX, 1993), 240–291, Contemp. Math., 167, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1994

  5. [5]

    Beals, and P

    R. Beals, and P. Greiner,Calculus on Heisenberg manifolds, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 119. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1988

  6. [6]

    Bernstein,Analytic structures on representation spaces of reductive groups, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol

    J. Bernstein,Analytic structures on representation spaces of reductive groups, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. II, Doc. Math. (1998), 519–525

  7. [7]

    Bernstein, and B

    J. Bernstein, and B. Kr¨ otz,Smooth Fr´ echet globalizations of Harish-Chandra modules, Israel J. Math. 199 (2014), no. 1, 45–111

  8. [8]

    B. E. Blank,Knapp-Wallach Szeg˝ o integrals and generalized principal series representations: the parabolic rank one case, J. Funct. Anal. 60 (1985), no. 2, 127–145

  9. [9]

    Borel, and L

    A. Borel, and L. Ji,Compactifications of symmetric and locally symmetric spaces, Mathematics: Theory & Applications. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2006

  10. [10]

    Bott,The index theorem for homogeneous differential operators, Differential and Combinatorial Topology (A Symposium in Honor of Marston Morse), pp

    R. Bott,The index theorem for homogeneous differential operators, Differential and Combinatorial Topology (A Symposium in Honor of Marston Morse), pp. 167–186, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1965

  11. [11]

    Boutet de Monvel, and V

    L. Boutet de Monvel, and V. Guillemin,The spectral theory of Toeplitz operators, Annals of Math- ematics Studies, 99. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1981

  12. [12]

    A. ˇCap, C. Harrach, and P. Julg,A Poisson transform adapted to the Rumin complex, J. Topol. Anal. 14 (2022), no. 3, 615–653

  13. [13]

    ˇCap, and J

    A. ˇCap, and J. Slov´ ak,Parabolic geometries. I. Background and general theory, Mathematical Sur- veys and Monographs, 154. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009. x+628 pp

  14. [14]

    A. ˇCap, J. Slov´ ak, and V. Souˇ cek,Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand sequences, Ann. of Math. (2) 154 (2001), no. 1, 97–113

  15. [15]

    Casselman,Canonical extensions of Harish-Chandra modules to representations ofG, Canadian Journal of Mathematics 41 (1989), 385–438

    W. Casselman,Canonical extensions of Harish-Chandra modules to representations ofG, Canadian Journal of Mathematics 41 (1989), 385–438

  16. [16]

    Chabert, S

    J. Chabert, S. Echterhoff, and R. Nest,The Connes-Kasparov conjecture for almost connected groups and for linearp-adic groups, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. No. 97 (2003), 239–278

  17. [17]

    Chen,S´ eries compl´ ementaires des groupes de Lorentz et KK-th´ eorie, J

    Z.Q. Chen,S´ eries compl´ ementaires des groupes de Lorentz et KK-th´ eorie, J. Funct. Anal. 137(1996), 76–96

  18. [18]

    Christ, D

    M. Christ, D. Geller, P. G lowacki, and L. Polin,Pseudodifferential operators on groups with dilations, Duke Math. J. 68 (1992), no. 1, 31–65

  19. [19]

    Clare, N

    P. Clare, N. Higson, Y. Song, and X. Tang,On the Connes-Kasparov isomorphism, I.Jpn. J. Math. 19 (2024), no. 1, 67–109

  20. [20]

    Clare, N

    P. Clare, N. Higson, and Y. Song,On the Connes-Kasparov isomorphism, II.Jpn. J. Math. 19 (2024), no. 1, 111–141

  21. [21]

    Couchet, and R

    N. Couchet, and R. Yuncken,On polyhomogeneous symbols and the Heisenberg pseudodifferential calculus, arXiv:2210.15391

  22. [22]

    L. J. Corwin, and F. P. Greenleaf,Representations of nilpotent Lie groups and their applications, Cambridge Studies Adv. Mathematics18. Cambridge University Press 1990

  23. [23]

    Dave, and S

    S. Dave, and S. Haller,The heat asymptotics on filtered manifolds, J. Geom. Anal. 30 (2020), no. 1, 337–389

  24. [24]

    Dave, and S

    S. Dave, and S. Haller,Graded hypoellipticity of BGG sequences, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 62(2022), 721-789

  25. [25]

    Debord, and J.-M

    C. Debord, and J.-M. Lescure,Index theory and groupoids, Geometric and topological methods for quantum field theory, pages 86–158. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010

  26. [26]

    Debord, and G

    C. Debord, and G. Skandalis,Adiabatic groupoid, crossed product byR ∗ + and pseudodifferential calculus, Adv. Math. 257 (2014), 66–91

  27. [27]

    Debord, and G

    C. Debord, and G. Skandalis,Psseudodifferential extensions and adiabatic deformation of smooth groupoid actions, Bull. Sci. Math., 139(7):750–776, 2015

  28. [28]

    Debord, and G

    C. Debord, and G. Skandalis,Lie groupoids, pseudodifferential calculus and index theory, Advances in noncommutative geometry, 245–289, Springer, Cham, (2019)

  29. [29]

    Engliˇ s, and J

    M. Engliˇ s, and J. Eschmeier,Geometric Arveson-Douglas conjectureAdv. Math. 274 (2015), 606– 630

  30. [30]

    Ewert,Index theory and groupoids for filtered manifolds, PhD thesis G¨ ottingen, 2020, available at this link

    E. Ewert,Index theory and groupoids for filtered manifolds, PhD thesis G¨ ottingen, 2020, available at this link

  31. [31]

    Ewert,Pseudodifferential operators on filtered manifolds as generalized fixed points, J

    E. Ewert,Pseudodifferential operators on filtered manifolds as generalized fixed points, J. Noncom- mut. Geom. 17 (2023), no. 1, 333–383

  32. [32]

    Fischer, and M

    V. Fischer, and M. Ruzhansky,Quantization on nilpotent Lie groups, Progress in Mathematics, 314. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, [Cham], 2016

  33. [33]

    Fox, and P

    J. Fox, and P. Haskell,K-amenability forSU(n,1), J. Funct. Anal. 117 (1993), no. 2, 274–307. 40 HEIKO GIMPERLEIN, MAGNUS GOFFENG

  34. [34]

    Fries,RelativeK-homology of higher-order differential operators, J

    M. Fries,RelativeK-homology of higher-order differential operators, J. Funct. Anal. 288 (2025), no. 1, Paper No. 110678, 45 pp

  35. [35]

    Furstenberg,A Poisson formula for semi-simple Lie groups, Ann

    H. Furstenberg,A Poisson formula for semi-simple Lie groups, Ann. of Math. (2) 77 (1963), 335–386

  36. [36]

    Gimperlein, B

    H. Gimperlein, B. Kr¨ otz, J. Kuit, H. Schlichtkrull,A Paley-Wiener theorem for Harish-Chandra modules, Cambridge J. Math. 10 (2022), 689–742

  37. [37]

    Gimperlein, B

    H. Gimperlein, B. Kr¨ otz, L. Roncal, and S. Thangavelu,Poisson transform and unipotent complex geometry, J. Funct. Anal. 288 (2025), no. 3, Paper No. 110742

  38. [38]

    Goffeng, and A

    M. Goffeng, and A. Kuzmin,Index theory of hypoelliptic operators on Carnot manifolds, arXiv:2203.04717

  39. [39]

    Goffeng,Solving the index problem for (curved) Bernstein–Gelfand–Gelfand sequences, arXiv:2406.07033

    M. Goffeng,Solving the index problem for (curved) Bernstein–Gelfand–Gelfand sequences, arXiv:2406.07033

  40. [40]

    Hansen, J

    S. Hansen, J. Hilgert, and A. Parthasarathy,Resonances and scattering poles in symmetric spaces of rank one, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2019, no. 20, 6362–6389

  41. [41]

    M. P. Gomez Aparicio, P. Julg, and A. Valette,The Baum-Connes conjecture: an extended survey, Advances in noncommutative geometry—on the occasion of Alain Connes’ 70th birthday, 127–244, Springer, Cham, 2019

  42. [42]

    B. H. Gross, and N. R. Wallach,On quaternionic discrete series representations, and their contin- uations, J. Reine Angew. Math. 481 (1996), 73–123

  43. [43]

    Helgason,A duality for symmetric spaces with applications to group representations, Advances in Math

    S. Helgason,A duality for symmetric spaces with applications to group representations, Advances in Math. 5 (1970), 1–154

  44. [44]

    Helgason,A duality for symmetric spaces with applications to group representations

    S. Helgason,A duality for symmetric spaces with applications to group representations. II. Differ- ential equations and eigenspace representations, Advances in Math. 22 (1976), no. 2, 187–219

  45. [45]

    Helgason,Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces, Pure and Applied Mathemat- ics, 80

    S. Helgason,Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces, Pure and Applied Mathemat- ics, 80. Academic Press, Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, 1978

  46. [46]

    Helgason,Groups and geometric analysis, Integral geometry, invariant differential operators, and spherical functions, Corrected reprint of the 1984 original

    S. Helgason,Groups and geometric analysis, Integral geometry, invariant differential operators, and spherical functions, Corrected reprint of the 1984 original. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs,

  47. [47]

    American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000

  48. [48]

    Helgason,Geometric analysis on symmetric spaces, Second edition

    S. Helgason,Geometric analysis on symmetric spaces, Second edition. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 39. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008

  49. [49]

    Higson, and G

    N. Higson, and G. Kasparov,E-theory andKK-theory for groups which act properly and isometri- cally on Hilbert space, Invent. Math. 144 (2001), no. 1, 23–74

  50. [50]

    H¨ ormander,The analysis of linear partial differential operators

    L. H¨ ormander,The analysis of linear partial differential operators. I. Distribution theory and Fourier analysis, Reprint of the second (1990) edition [Springer, Berlin; MR1065993 (91m:35001a)]. Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003

  51. [51]

    Julg,How to prove the Baum-Connes conjecture for the groupsSp(n,1)?J

    P. Julg,How to prove the Baum-Connes conjecture for the groupsSp(n,1)?J. Geom. Phys. 141 (2019), 105–119

  52. [52]

    Julg, and G

    P. Julg, and G. Kasparov,OperatorK-theory for the groupSU(n,1), J. Reine Angew. Math. 463 (1995), 99–152

  53. [53]

    Julg, and S

    P. Julg, and S. Nishikawa,Slow exponential growth representations ofSp(n,1)at the edge of Cowl- ing’s strip, J. Operator Theory 92 (2024), 283–302

  54. [54]

    Kashiwara, A

    M. Kashiwara, A. Kowata, K. Minemura, K. Okamoto, T. ¯Oshima, M. Tanaka,Eigenfunctions of invariant differential operators on a symmetric space, Ann. of Math. (2) 107 (1978), no. 1, 1–39

  55. [55]

    Lie theory and geometry

    M. Kashiwara, and W. Schmid,Quasi-equivariant D-modules, equivariant derived category, and representations of reductive Lie groups, in “Lie theory and geometry”, Progr. Math. 123 (1994), 457–488, Birkh¨ auser, Boston

  56. [56]

    G. G. Kasparov,Lorentz groups: K-theory of unitary representations and crossed products, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 275 (1984), 541–545

  57. [57]

    A. A. Kirillov,Lectures on the orbit method, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 64. American Math- ematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004

  58. [58]

    A. W. Knapp, and E. M. Stein,Intertwining operators for semisimple groups, Ann. of Math. (2) 93 (1971), 489–578

  59. [59]

    A. W. Knapp, and N. R. Wallach,Szeg¨ o kernels associated with discrete series, Invent. Math. 34 (1976), no. 3, 163–200

  60. [60]

    A. W. Knapp,Representation theory of semisimple groups. An overview based on examples, Reprint of the 1986 original. Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001

  61. [61]

    Lafforgue,K-th´ eorie bivariante pour les alg` ebres de Banach et conjecture de Baum-Connes, Invent

    V. Lafforgue,K-th´ eorie bivariante pour les alg` ebres de Banach et conjecture de Baum-Connes, Invent. Math. 149 (2002), no. 1, 1–95

  62. [62]

    Lafforgue,BanachKK-theory and the Baum-Connes conjecture, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol

    V. Lafforgue,BanachKK-theory and the Baum-Connes conjecture, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. II (Beijing, 2002), 795–812, Higher Ed. Press, Beijing, 2002

  63. [63]

    Lafforgue,Un renforcement de la propri´ et´ e (T), Duke Math

    V. Lafforgue,Un renforcement de la propri´ et´ e (T), Duke Math. J. 143 (2008), no. 3, 559–602

  64. [64]

    Lafforgue,La conjecture de Baum-Connes ` a coefficients pour les groupes hyperboliques, J

    V. Lafforgue,La conjecture de Baum-Connes ` a coefficients pour les groupes hyperboliques, J. Non- commut. Geom. 6 (2012), no. 1, 1–197. POISSON TRANSFORMS AND THE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE 41

  65. [65]

    Liu, and G

    H. Liu, and G. Zhang,Realization of quaternionic discrete series on the unit ball inH d, J. Funct. Anal. 262 (2012), no. 7, 2979–3005

  66. [66]

    Mazzeo, and A

    R. Mazzeo, and A. Vasy,Analytic continuation of the resolvent of the Laplacian on symmetric spaces of noncompact type, J. Funct. Anal. 228 (2005), no. 2, 311–368

  67. [67]

    Melin,Lie filtrations and pseudo-differential operators, Preprint, 1982

    A. Melin,Lie filtrations and pseudo-differential operators, Preprint, 1982

  68. [68]

    Mohsen,On the deformation groupoid of the inhomogeneous pseudo-differential calculus, Bull

    O. Mohsen,On the deformation groupoid of the inhomogeneous pseudo-differential calculus, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 53 (2021), no. 2, 575–592

  69. [69]

    Ørsted, and G

    B. Ørsted, and G. Zhang,Laplacians on quotients of Cauchy-Riemann complexes and Szeg˝ o map forL 2-harmonic forms, Indag. Math. (N.S.) 16 (2005), no. 3-4, 639–653

  70. [70]

    Parthasarathy,Dirac operator and the discrete series, Ann

    R. Parthasarathy,Dirac operator and the discrete series, Ann. of Math. (2) 96 (1972), 1–30

  71. [71]

    Pedon,Harmonic analysis for differential forms on complex hyperbolic spaces, J

    E. Pedon,Harmonic analysis for differential forms on complex hyperbolic spaces, J. Geom. Phys. 32 (1999), no. 2, 102–130

  72. [72]

    Pedon,The differential form spectrum of quaternionic hyperbolic spaces, Bull

    E. Pedon,The differential form spectrum of quaternionic hyperbolic spaces, Bull. Sci. Math. 129 (2005), no. 3, 227–265

  73. [73]

    R. S. Ponge,Noncommutative residue invariants for CR and contact manifolds, J. Reine Angew. Math. 614 (2008), 117–151

  74. [74]

    R. S. Ponge,Heisenberg calculus and spectral theory of hypoelliptic operators on Heisenberg mani- folds, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 194 (2008), no. 906, viii+ 134 pp

  75. [75]

    Prudhon,K-theory forSp(n,1), J

    N. Prudhon,K-theory forSp(n,1), J. Funct. Anal. 221 (2005), no. 1, 226–249

  76. [76]

    Puschnigg,Finitely summable Fredholm modules over higher rank groups and lattices, J.K- Theory 8 (2011), no

    M. Puschnigg,Finitely summable Fredholm modules over higher rank groups and lattices, J.K- Theory 8 (2011), no. 2, p. 223–239

  77. [77]

    Schmid,On the realization of the discrete series of a semisimple Lie group, Rice Univ

    W. Schmid,On the realization of the discrete series of a semisimple Lie group, Rice Univ. Studies 56, No. 2, 99-108 (1970)

  78. [78]

    Schmid,Boundary value problems for group invariant differential equations, The mathematical heritage of Elie Cartan (Lyon, 1984)

    W. Schmid,Boundary value problems for group invariant differential equations, The mathematical heritage of Elie Cartan (Lyon, 1984). Ast´ erisque 1985, Numero Hors Serie, 311–321

  79. [79]

    A: Shubin,Pseudodifferential operators and spectral theory, Translated from the 1978 Russian original by Stig I

    M. A: Shubin,Pseudodifferential operators and spectral theory, Translated from the 1978 Russian original by Stig I. Andersson. Second edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001

  80. [80]

    Street,Maximal subellipticity, De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 93

    B. Street,Maximal subellipticity, De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 93. De Gruyter, Berlin, 2023

Showing first 80 references.