Search for the decays X(3872)to K_(S)⁰K^(pm)π^(mp) and K^*(892)bar{K} at BESIII
Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:56 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
No significant signals are observed for the X(3872) decaying into K_S^0 K^± π^∓ or K^*(892) K-bar.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Using a 10.9 fb^{-1} data sample, no significant signal is observed for X(3872) → K_S^0 K^± π^∓ or X(3872) → K^*(892) K-bar. Upper limits are set at the 90% confidence level on the relative branching fractions B[X(3872)→K_S^0 K^± π^∓]/B[X(3872)→π^+ π^- J/ψ] < 0.07 and B[X(3872)→K^*(892) K-bar]/B[X(3872)→π^+ π^- J/ψ] < 0.10. Upper limits on the product of production cross section and branching fraction are also given at each energy point.
What carries the argument
Invariant-mass reconstruction of the K_S^0 K^± π^∓ and K^*(892) K-bar final states in events where the X(3872) is produced radiatively in e^+ e^- collisions, with signal extraction performed by comparing observed yields against expected background shapes.
If this is right
- The branching fraction for X(3872) to K_S^0 K^± π^∓ is at most 7 percent of the branching fraction to π^+ π^- J/ψ.
- The branching fraction for X(3872) to K^*(892) K-bar is at most 10 percent of the branching fraction to π^+ π^- J/ψ.
- Upper limits on the product of the radiative production cross section and each branching fraction are provided at every scanned center-of-mass energy.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- These limits can be compared against predictions from different models of the X(3872) internal structure to see which allow sizable strange-quark content.
- Future higher-luminosity runs could tighten the limits further or reveal a signal if the true branching fractions sit just below the current bounds.
- The absence of signal constrains the possible coupling of the X(3872) to strange mesons relative to its known non-strange decays.
Load-bearing premise
The shapes of backgrounds and the detector efficiencies for the selected final states are modeled without large unaccounted systematic biases.
What would settle it
A statistically significant excess (above 5 sigma) appearing at the X(3872) mass in either the K_S^0 K^± π^∓ or K^*(892) K-bar invariant-mass distribution would falsify the reported absence of signal.
Figures
read the original abstract
Using a 10.9 fb$^{-1}$ data sample collected by the BESIII detector at center-of-mass energies from 4.16 to 4.34 GeV, we search for the charmless decays $X(3872) \to K_{S}^{0}K^{\pm}\pi^{\mp}$ and $K^*(892)\bar{K}$, where the $X(3872)$ is produced via the radiative process $e^+e^- \to \gamma X(3872)$. No significant signal is observed. We set upper limits on the relative branching fractions $\mathcal{B}[X(3872)\to K_S K^{\pm} \pi^{\mp}]/\mathcal{B}[X(3872)\to\pi^+\pi^- J/\psi] <0.07$ and $\mathcal{B}[X(3872)\to K^* (892)\bar{K}]/\mathcal{B}[X(3872)\to \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi] <0.10$ at the 90$\%$ confidence level. Additionally, upper limits on the product of the cross section $\sigma[e^+e^-\to\gamma X(3872)]$ and the branching fractions $\mathcal{B}[X(3872)\to K_{S}^{0}K^{\pm}\pi^{\mp}]$ and $\mathcal{B}[X(3872)\to K^*(892)\bar{K}]$ are reported at each energy point. In all cases, $K^*(892)\bar{K}$ refers to the sum of the modes $K^*(892)^+K^{-}+\text{c.c.}$ and $K^*(892)^0\bar{K}^0+\text{c.c.}$, where c.c. denotes the corresponding charge-conjugate modes.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports a search for the charmless decays X(3872) → K_S^0 K^± π^∓ and X(3872) → K*(892) K-bar (sum of charged and neutral modes) using 10.9 fb^{-1} of e^+e^- data collected by BESIII at √s = 4.16–4.34 GeV, with X(3872) produced via radiative return. No significant signal is observed in the reconstructed invariant-mass spectra. Upper limits are set on the relative branching fractions B[X(3872)→K_S^0 K^± π^∓]/B[X(3872)→π^+π^- J/ψ] < 0.07 and B[X(3872)→K*(892) K-bar]/B[X(3872)→π^+π^- J/ψ] < 0.10 at 90% CL. Limits on the product σ(e^+e^- → γ X(3872)) × B are also reported at each energy point.
Significance. If the upper limits hold, the result constrains models of the X(3872) internal structure by limiting possible charmless decay widths, which are expected to differ between molecular, tetraquark, and hybrid interpretations. The analysis employs standard statistical procedures for setting 90% CL limits on null results with a well-defined data sample, providing reproducible constraints that can be directly compared to theoretical predictions.
minor comments (3)
- The abstract and summary state that background shape and detector efficiency are modeled, but the manuscript should explicitly state the functional form used for the background (e.g., polynomial order or ARGUS function) and the method for efficiency determination (MC simulation with data-driven corrections) in the relevant analysis section to allow independent verification of the quoted limits.
- Table or figure presenting the fit results should include the number of observed events, expected background, and signal yield (or upper limit) for each mode and energy point to make the null-result claim fully transparent.
- The systematic uncertainty evaluation for the efficiency ratio and background normalization should be summarized in a dedicated table, even if the total is small, to quantify the robustness of the 90% CL limits.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the recognition of its significance for constraining X(3872) models, and the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report.
Circularity Check
No circularity: standard experimental upper limits from data counts
full rationale
The paper performs a search for rare decays using 10.9 fb^{-1} of e+e- collision data. Event yields are extracted from invariant-mass distributions via unbinned maximum-likelihood fits to data; efficiencies are determined from Monte Carlo simulation of signal and background processes. Upper limits at 90% CL are computed from the observed (consistent-with-zero) signal yields using standard frequentist or Bayesian procedures. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the target data and then relabeled as a prediction; no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that defines the final result; the derivation chain consists solely of direct statistical inference from the recorded events and detector response modeling. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity score.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Poisson statistics govern event counting and background fluctuations in the signal region.
- domain assumption Detector efficiency and acceptance are correctly estimated from simulation for the chosen final states.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
S. K. Choiet al.[Belle Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262001 (2003)
work page 2003
-
[2]
Acostaet al.[CDF Collaboration], Phys
D. Acostaet al.[CDF Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 072001 (2004)
work page 2004
-
[3]
V . M. Abazovet al.[D0 Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 162002 (2004)
work page 2004
-
[4]
Aubertet al.[BaBar Collaboration], Phys
B. Aubertet al.[BaBar Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D71, 071103 (2005). 11
work page 2005
-
[5]
Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], Phys
R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 222001 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[6]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 092001 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[7]
Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], Phys
S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[8]
Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], Phys
R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D92, 011102 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[9]
Aushevet al.[Belle Collaboration], Phys
T. Aushevet al.[Belle Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D81, 031103 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[10]
Aubertet al.[BaBar Collaboration], Phys
B. Aubertet al.[BaBar Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D77, 011102 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[11]
Hirataet al.[Belle Collaboration], Phys
H. Hirataet al.[Belle Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D107, 112011 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[12]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 242001 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[13]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 232002 (2019)
work page 2019
- [14]
-
[15]
E. J. Eichten, K. Lane and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. D69, 094019 (2004)
work page 2004
- [16]
-
[17]
F. E. Close and P. R. Page, Phys. Lett. B578, 119-123 (2004)
work page 2004
-
[18]
S. Fleming, M. Kusunoki, T. Mehen and U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. D76, 034006 (2007)
work page 2007
- [19]
- [20]
-
[21]
R. D. Matheus, S. Narison, M. Nielsen and J. M. Richard, Phys. Rev. D75, 014005 (2007)
work page 2007
-
[22]
Y . S. Kalashnikova, Phys. Rev. D72, 034010 (2005)
work page 2005
- [23]
- [24]
-
[25]
J. P. Leeset al.[BaBar Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D95, 072007 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[26]
Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], Phys
R. Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D108, 032010 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[27]
Ablikimet al.[BES Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BES Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D74, 072001 (2006)
work page 2006
-
[28]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D110, 012007 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[29]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D96, 111102 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[30]
Yan Wang, Qi Wu, Gang Li, Wen-Hua Qin, Xiao-Hai Liu, Chun-Sheng An, and Ju-Jun Xie, Phys. Rev. D106, 074015 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[31]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Nucl
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A614, 345-399 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[32]
C. H. Yuet al., Proceedings of IPAC2016, Busan, Korea, 2016
work page 2016
-
[33]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Chin
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Chin. Phys. C44, 040001 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[34]
X. Liet al., Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods1, 13 (2017); Y . X. Guoet al., Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods1, 15 (2017); P. Caoet al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A953, 163053 (2020)
work page 2017
-
[35]
Agostinelliet al.[GEANT4 Collaboration], Nucl
S. Agostinelliet al.[GEANT4 Collaboration], Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506, 250 (2003)
work page 2003
- [36]
-
[37]
D. J. Lange, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462, 152 (2001); R. G. Ping, Chin. Phys. C32, 599 (2008)
work page 2001
-
[38]
E. Barberio, B. van Eijk and Z. Was, Comput. Phys. Commun. 66, 115 (1991)
work page 1991
-
[39]
J. C. Chen, G. S. Huang, X. R. Qi, D. H. Zhang and Y . S. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D62, 034003 (2000); R. L. Yang, R. G. Ping and H. Chen, Chin. Phys. Lett.31, 061301 (2014)
work page 2000
-
[40]
Il- ten, S.Mrenna, S.Prestel, C.O.Rasmussen, and P.Z.Skands, Comput
T.Sjöstrand, S.Ask, J.R.Christiansen, R.Corke, N.Desai, P. Il- ten, S.Mrenna, S.Prestel, C.O.Rasmussen, and P.Z.Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun.191, 159 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[41]
C. Rover, C. Messenger and R. Prix, doi:10.5170/CERN-2011- 006.158
-
[42]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Chin
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Chin. Phys. C46, 113002 (2022)
work page 2022
- [43]
-
[44]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D96, 012001 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[45]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D83, 112005 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[46]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D99, 112010 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[47]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D87, 012002 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[48]
W. Sun, T. Liu, M. Jing, L. Wang, B. Zhong and W. Song, Front. Phys. (Beijing)16, 64501 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[49]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D109, L071101 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[50]
Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys
M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D109, L011102 (2024)
work page 2024
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.